Trial for romance novelist and accused murderer Nancy Brophy continues | Day 6 afternoon session
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 апр 2022
- Nancy Brophy is accused of shooting and killing her husband, Dan Brophy, at the Oregon Culinary Institute in 2018. In the afternoon session of Day 6 of the trial, the state continued to call witnesses to the stand.
Full story: www.kgw.com/article/news/crim...
Subscribe: / kgwnews8
Watch the latest KGW newscast: www.kgw.com/watch
Get the KGW app: kgw.com/appredirect 
Развлечения
It would be really great if this trial had a Playlist to keep everything together for those of us that work during the day!
#Playlistplease
A sociopath would take the stand, much like a perpetrator would defend itself. She loves this attention. She is smug and really staring at the witnesses in a horribly accusatory way. I think she wrote her own fantasy in books and thought she was so smart. If you don't sob at much of those first witnesses, something is seriously wrong.
Yes...
Like Jodi Arias 😈
Play the lady analyst at 0.75 speed in order to make sense of what she's saying and avoid a headache. You're welcome :P
GREED IS A SIN! HE APPEARED TO BE A WONDERFUL HUSBAND, BROTHER, FATHER, FRIEND, SON, R.I.P.!❤
His weakness was difficulty in choosing a good woman. So sad for a genuinely great man.
Yes, is it strange that Dans mom is sitting on defense side of courtroom?
@@byBeauxARTFULIVINGI think she ended up sitting behind Nancy so that Nancy couldn't keep staring at her as she did on other days. 😄
Anyone else think it really odd that a few weeks before this Mr Brophy sustained a cut on his hand due to “the shower glass shattering ? What drew my attention was when Mrs B said, “he’s having a bad week” after describing this incident whilst being told of her husbands death, and then saying “ oh that sounds bad or inappropriate” or something like that. Too right love, that’s the point I thought guilty as hell, and then I thought, was the shower shattering planned ? I mean I’ve never heard of anything like that happening ever. If she testifies I’d roast her on that comment and then questioning her re the shower incident.
Good catch @debs440606 She also took Dan on a cruise, and she'd happened to mention that murder on a cruise (as far as I remember, in her AMZN profile) might be the way to go. IIRC the cruise was after she had bought the first batch of insurance policies. I think she had tried murder before...
@@sleuththewild really ! That’s spooky. It’s like she can’t blur the borders between fantasy and reality. She’s just so cold it’s chilling!
@@Debs440606 Exactly. Crampton Brophy thinks her fantasies can be real. The murder was to make them so.
I thought the same thing. ...was she doing dry runs of attempting to murder him?
@@BeachButterfly22 I think she had many scenarios she might have tried....trip along a cliff on one of their romantic getaways (Monterey), overboard on the mystery cruise... The cut on his hand strikes me that she went after him with one of his chef's knives; the shattered shower door, maybe she pushed him; the "leak"; the kitchen up in flames....
She is guilty. Or... she lied about where she was... and then circled around Dan's work while someone else was murdering him.
Shawn Overstreet is doing a great job. I’ve been watching this trial every day. He’s painting a damning picture of what happened that morning. It is NOT normal to have that many life insurance policies . It was laughable that Maxfield in her opening statement said Nancy was a strong believer in life insurance, as if that is a believable reason for Nancy to have so many policies on her husband. Nancy really thought she came up with a genius way to get away with murdering her husband because of all the “research” she’s done for her writing
And Dan’s parents were not interested in life ins - Jack said no one would profit from their death. It’s so odd Dan would sign a policy application but that’s Management’s influence
I don’t believe Dan had to sign the policies.
@@sleuththewild If the insurance policy is for yourself, you must sign the application form. NB wrote at least one policy, so it’s possible she could have forged his signature.
@@hoppy6141 my insurance man told me I could have an insurance policy on anyone, even my next door neighbor as long as I paid the premium! My husband & I were separated at the time,& he was a heavy drinker, crazy driver, careless living!! Insurance man said I need to get a policy on him if I could at all afford it!
I imagine nb would strongly believe in life insurance,she was selling insurance so would stand to profit!! And having it, especially multiple policies on Dan she would profit big time!! Then get big money for their property!!
I'm on the cell phone data expert. Look at the defense. Suddenly, both of them have pulled away from the defendant, sitting back close to each other, creating a space between them and Nancy, who is sitting really forward in her seat. I swear, she's gathering information for another book, and she's also staring harshly at the witness.
I think that witness is the least likely to be bothered, both because she has no personal connection with Nancy, because her personality is loud, and also because she's all analysis and numbers. The poor other witnesses...even the woman cop.
So she goes out of her way to buy a buildable gun. But orders it online leaving a trace. Then drives all over town thinking she wouldn’t be caught. She probably thought she was smart. Nope.
Man the volume is terrible!!
She can clearly be seen driving the vehicle when it stopped at a junction at the beginning of the montage.
I got annoyed with the defense bringing up her right to remain silent but even more so annoyed with the prosecution never addressing it appropriately. The correct response is that there’s a difference between someone remaining silent and someone actively engaging police to mislead them. She should be charged with obstruction of justice.
I wish I knew more about their house fire.
Please post DAY 2 of trial. Thank you
KGW seems not to have recorded it for some reason.
Day 2 was not streamed by any media outlet
Agree…I looked all over for day 2 and found nothing
Kabby,
Day 2 is news of the trial.
If you want to watch it,
Trype in...
Day 2 of the Romance Novelist Murder Trial
It should take you to it.
I can hardly hear it!
She researched the weapon, went to the gun show, handled the weapon at the gun show, purchased the weapon fie a significant amount of money and all of a sudden she didn't like guns or want it in the house?? LOL
For someone who doesn't like guns and supposedly never shot one she hit her target in perfect center mass.
Day 2 can be found on the Court TV website.
This phone expert Kayla talks like a valley girl, totally
Playlist, thats my only thing I have to search for parts. Please if you are covering this make it easier.
She was smart enough to leave her phone at home
But not smart enough to know she would be seen on camera. True rookie move.
It’s so odd, we’re in 2022 and the volume of this entire trial is all over the place. They know it’s gonna be recorded, so why in the world isn’t it better? They could’ve hired me, a layperson, and I’d manage to do a better job…
Crampton Brophy moves towards prosecution witnesses while they are being cross-examined. She also stares at them all the time. Trying to intimidate. I'm surprised her attorney hasn't told her to stop it, because it's not a good look if you're trying to seem innocent, but maybe she doesn't listen to her attorney.
I’m surprised she’s taking the stand. She does not have a likable countenance based on police interview and behavior during trial.
@@catherinearmstrong388 I agree. Plus, Crampton Brophy talks and talks and talks. That might not work for her, either, especially since all that talk seems intended to mislead investigators. Watch her try to use the same strategy on the jury.
I’ve never seen a witness box that close to a defendant. Bizarre
Here's where "nancy talks too much" like her character in story" -- when she is given a ride home -- what do you think?
Can you believe defense will have her testify?! I can’t imagine what might come out of her mouth.
Guilty af.
Juror #8, and why do say that this early?
Come on sound guy turn up the volume already. We shouldn't have to strain or put on headphones to hear this already
The cell data chick needs to dial it down a few notches geez Louise
The last witness..her frying voice...can t stand it
Me neither, it's doing my head in. Why do people do that, do they think it's attractive or something??
I honestly think that many young women who grew up trying to emulate the horrible Kardashians got it from there. I can’t listen to it AT ALL.
Audio quality is bad and the "screen" setup is mmmh not sure of the software computer programs used BUT really bad!
Where is the footage from day 2? All I can find are a couple of short clips.
For some reason, KGW did not have complete coverage of day two. KOIN had some coverage.
It wasn't streamed for any outlet
Oh lord the phone testimony …. Rather watch paint dry
Personally I would have taken a picture of her in the same position that she was seen on video
I miss a mobile camera and zoom ins.
I'm shocked the prosecution didn't get the detaed coverage records for the phones
Is there a video of Nancy brophy’s police interview?
No just audio
Fantasy Cellmates: This POS, Nancy, Anthony Todt and Darrell Brooks. With 24/7 video feed for our viewing pleasure.
Just as a sidenote...
The quality of sound & picture is awful.
Whoever the camera guy was needs ti check what he's recording.
Having the camera on the placard behind or continually on the same photo for many minutes is very off putting.
Why not do a split screen.
This case isn't old, it's not like the technology isn't available.
Struggling to keep going with this 🤷♀️
Ms. Maxfield please don’t put your hands in the pockets of your man suit when addressing the judge it’s disrespectful
She was trying to give the impression of being a big ovary-d kind of lawyer. Ya know, kinda showing the judge who's what.🤣🤣🤣
Whew!, Sorry to be so silly but those two defense attys really caricatured themselves throughout this trial.😅 I enjoyed your observations on their tomfoolery.😅😊
Sweet vocal fryyyyyyyyyyyy..
Although things have changed with the building, would have been better to have taken the JURY to the area?
I find that female officers voice annoying! Is she talking through her nose?!😣
“Kinda”…how does Overstreet think this is a proper word to ask a question with?
his reason for not doing more - "he was in shock" police are not meant to be in shock but are meant to be impartial gatherers of anything and everything. the second they saw her van, she became a suspect and their duty as gatherers of evidence should overshadow any personal feelings or emotion, they should have swabbed her, got her clothing, and got a search warrant for her house and truck....instead they can now imply her guilt but not prove it.
The police did a good job. I think they know how to go about their work.
True that comment from the detective struck me as odd too detectives are supposed to be able to compartmentalise their feelings and emotions so as not to let their feelings effect their investigation what surprised me even more no one questioned the detective further on this from either side especially the defence
It’s odd you don’t can’t attribute a feeling of shock to a police officer. I’d be shocked to have had an interview with the widow and nothing said about being in the vicinity of the murder and immediately be presented with evidence that her actions as described were not accurate. It goes to how the two detectives had no suspicion of her guilt.
@@ASHES234 police officers are just humans with a difficult job. They are not robots without emotions. On top of that they are always being hassled for not having compassion for people. So when they do and end up shocked that they murdered someone, they get hassled for that too. They are humans, just like us.
@@awright119021 yes with the power to kill u an put you in jail. Also qualified immunity in a great union that protects there ass when they mess up
Did u see the cop that park on train tracks with a woman hand cuff an she was hit by a train
So im a day behind and just coming up on the witness stand is Kelsey guay. If Nancy’s cell phone pings anywhere near the OCI school she is screwed and stupid. Come on people if you are going to commit a crime leave your phone at home!
She did leave her phone at home. That was covered in the testimony on day six.
@@GH-oi2jf yeah I’m listening to it now.
@@GH-oi2jf not sure what the point of her testimony is?
@@WhatInTheHellWisconsin - To establish where her phone was and whether it was being used at the critical times.
Leaving your phone at home can be just as damning
This data geek talks too fast.😳
What bothers me is that she uses “data” as a singular.
@@barbaragrove6097 I came here to find out if anyone else was annoyed. She's awful.
Takes her forever to get to the point.
Well well well looks like MS crime writer boo booed
Isn’t it about time to take off those damn masks??
More interesting is that Crampton-Brophy tried to get out of jail 2 years ago, arguing that she was in imminent likelihood of death from COVID. Now, in a courtroom where masks are required for protection against COVID, she has decided not to wear one. She is making clear she doesn't give a rip about rules and regulations. Not a good look if you want to argue you're law-abiding.
It's past time
No
Have you noticed that the only person not wearing a mask, apart from the person testifying, is the defendant? I hope she's not carrying the bug and passes it on to a vulnerable person or someone who lives with one.
covid is stil running rampant so no. but im sure you got your MD from Facebook university right