Stephen Meyer's book The Signature in the Cell lays the final nail in the coffin of Darwinian macro-evolution. It makes me angry to know that a failed hypothesis is taught as fact in our schools. We must take up the fight again for the sake of intellectual honesty.
Sassy they are desperate. They need something against God. This ridiculous theory is the only thing they have. But their strategy is to make it so complicated that the masses don’t understand so they just blindly follow
Sassy... but, but, but, didn't you hear what "savior" of the world, the activist had to say? You're just one of those stupid people that need Darwinism beating into your thick head. You don't deserve to have your own thoughts. Only special people, like him, deserve to carry on and represent the human race.
It doesn't need to debunk macro evolution.. Because there is no such thing as biological evolution micro macro or otherwise.... Evolution is a religion of metaphysical naturalism and a fairytale.. good website for you! www.evolutionfairytale.com
The one thing that is so obvious to me is our ability to communicate reason and understand words sentences and ideas. That is an extremely complex thing for the brain to do. But he has the problem. The brain doesn't do that. It's the spirit of man that Job talked about. The ability to speak reason etc is a spiritual entity within us. It is a part that God gave us from him. Because understanding language reason ideas is on a divine level.
"Evolution is not fiction like Mother Goose where the cow jumps over the moon. A cow can jump a low fence so Mother Goose is straight forward fantasy that children enjoy. Inverted Mother Goose would be the moon jumping over the cow. That kind of inverted fantasy is what evolution is, the exact opposite of reality." Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo
My college biology teacher showed us those embryo drawings as an example of evolution. When you ask? Surely that must have been decades ago since they were known to be fraudulent a hundred years ago. Nope. It was in 2015 in college of all places.
I really love all your content. Have been a huge fan of Stephen Meyer and Michael Behe especially. Keep up your good works. May God support you all in your work.
It just occurred to me and that all the other types of Life on this planet, that are supposedly of equal value as humans, must have their own opinions. Are there any Facebook pages, or other social media platforms where we can talk to some of these equally valuable life forms? Surely, they should be allowed to speak for themselves.
A few months ago I worked with some great people on the Theory of Evolution. I will not lie and say that I did not enjoy it. I have a Degree in Environmental Biology and I am working on another degree in Neuroscience. I love science and while I lack the "senses divinitatus" that theist have, I admit that the standard story of evolution has massive holes. But if you speak out you will be called an idiot or risk losing your job. I do not reject evolution, I reject the versions taught in schools today. But most people tend to just parrot what they hear without actually being scientists themselves.
Darwin was a kooky character. he comes up with a theory to try and disprove God, (fails of course) but not without some casualties along the way. but then in his autobiography writes that "i believes that the universe was created by a mind similar to that of Man's, and for that i deserves to be called a theist." and some how this inconsistent wacko is praised as a great scientist.
When persisting in unbelief and godlessness the logical and reasonable argument will be avoided due to blinded thinking. Unbelief after all is alike addiction and sickness, and getting out of it by our own is not easy. God must help or we go astray.
Your correct that an idea having negative repercussions does not make the idea wrong , but when the idea is wrong and causes repercussions , then it's not right.
I'm a retired biologist and believe it or not in my college days it was an atheist evolutionist, the late Lynn Margulis that turned me off of Darwin. It was her insistence that Neo-Darwinism's processes could not have made the innovations that we see that took place like why would a kidney/liver evolve? Not by mutations nor Natural Selection, so she developed her Endosymbiosis Theory. I thought she was the first to come up with the pithy saying that Natural Selection only explains the survival of the fittest and not the arrival of the fittest. It had been used many years before in the late 19th Century though, but I got her point that the way Natural Selection is talked about you'd think it was magical and could create all the wonders we see in the biological world. With harmful mutations to help it along of course.
I’m a retired MD and in my pre-med days, the prevailing assumption of professors was abiogenesis/phylogenetic tree of life paradigm. As I studied pre-med and medical school, I could see how insane that paradigm is. There are interdependencies in cellular and physiological processes that make it impossible that Magic Molecules could have “created themselves”so as to interdependently work together to obtain energy, break down energy, maintain homeostasis, etc. As “they say”, it’s chicken-egg problems from top to bottom! Without a cell membrane you can’t get organelles grouped together; but you can’t get a cell membrane without organelles; you can’t get organelles without DNA; you can’t get DNA without proteins; you can’t get proteins without DNA and organelles. It’s crazy! We are created. Simple as that.
I love the series. I have concerns with the widely accepted idea amongst christian thinkers that man has an eternal soul and a hell of fire These are extremely popular and conflicting doctrines in churches but which receive no support from Bible revelations and are medieval theology. The Bible is very clear to say that God only is immortal and that man is an indivisible being. Instead of desembodied destinies the Bible presents the Resurection of the last days. No where it says dead people are in the glory upon dying. Hell. sheol in Hebrew means grave and not an eternal place of torment. Something absurdly contrary with any conceivable punishments. Instead the Bible says to believe so that they will not PERISH. and this is all portrayed in the Bible Instead modern Christianity thru these very strange twisting of the Bible has made it even harder for others to believe.
I think I saw some issues told on this video on that documentary movie Expelled: No intelligence Allowed done by Ben Stein. The issue that third right had a secret project genome using Darwin’s theory of evolution to contribute to it. By the way great video.
I dont know mr, i listened to the whole presentation and i am intrigued by this “intelligent design” idea but i am still firm on atheism and evolution theory.
This video is eye-opening!! Thank you for your work. What is the intelligent design stand on the head skulls of the primates that evolutionists conclude evolve into human skulls. Are the dating methods wrong for the skulls? Are they really showing progression over time? Are the intelligent design biologists working on this?
Forever "grateful" to great Leslie Nielsen for being in my brain 'till the day I die. Surely you understand what I mean "stop calling me Shirley" no matter the time or place. Funerals included. The man ruined me forever.
Hey I caught you on another video. I’m also a retired MD. It seems to me that MDs have a more “humanist” view of the same biological processes that PhDs study, and it’s easier for MDs to “see” just how impossible it is that abiogenesis/phylogenetic tree of life is a true paradigm. Maybe it’s because we are looking at the trees but also see the forest; whereas PhDs only look at the trees. Maybe it’s the multidisciplinary aspect of Medicine that makes us see the exquisite interdependencies of all organs and physiological systems that make an evolutionary hypothesis impossible. What good is a retina without a cerebral cortex? What good is a cornea without a lens? What good is a single cranial nucleus three unless you have it working in concert with four and six and the pupils and the extra ocular muscles?! How could things evolve stepwise?! How could you evolve into an electron transport chain stepwise?! Or the Kreb’s cycle?! I don’t understand atheist materialist scientific worldview at all if you have studied these things! Thoughts?!
I'm 18 seconds in and I just wanna say....it wasn't Charles Darwin's corrosive idea. It was James Hutton's corrosive idea. Then Charles Lyell took over and Charles Darwin went forward with what he "learned" from Hutton and Lyel. So put the blame where blame belongs! Darwin is just a "stooge".
Here's the difference, the theories that we ourselves try and develop that show how we got here, can and will evolve over time. But these theories have evidence that is observable and tangible. So in 2020, we might not have a full scope of how humans have evolved on earth, but there is nothing that is saying we have to. There is no timeline to try and figure it all out. These theories change and evolve just like cell phones, cars, computers. But the idea that god created all this is stagnant. We can't do anything with that but just leave that right where it is. It isn't testable or observable. So if your satisfied by that statement that god created ALL THIS, then just live with that. But others who want more answers will try and search and develop those answers with or without god.
Just semantics perhaps but doesn't the word "selection" in "natural selection" necessarily imply the ability to make one choice over another in the supposed "intent" to increase the chance of survival? If so does it not stand to reason that to make a choice requires the ability to make it as a result of a conscious act of volition and thus intelligence? If things in nature adjust and change by this mechanism then it stands to reason that things cannot be a coincidence. What came first "The chicken or the Egg"? If nature could speak to us in our own language we would be amazed I am sure.
People do not have souls that survive death that is a pagan belief Genesis 3:19 ) In the sweat of your face you will eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken. For dust you are and to dust you will return.”
Aryan-Vedic Shastras are superior to Western Science. Those who dwell beyond the Indus know all that we know, have known for far longer, and know more than we know. They know more than our secular scientists can know, for their Shastras are informed by spiritual philosophies that span the Theistic to a-Theistic without reduction to material dogma. And yet, our secular atheists worship Kali, sacrificing to her on a scale that would embarrass the Aztecs. The de-constructionists are right, up to a point: moral order and value are social constructs, whatever the underlying philosophy or even divine inspiration. Man has no value, but what he can hold in mutuality within a polity, culture or faith, and to those beyond the marches of his polity, culture and faith. Then is his value measured by the value in which he holds others.
13:15 the title of the Book is "God is not Great" not "Why God is not Great". Christopher Hitchens may have been an ass, but he was telling the truth. Theres nothing with wrong with hoping that Heaven exists, but there is no evidence for it.
What evidence are you looking for when talking about another dimension or plain of existence? Don't talk about proof or evidence when talking about something that exists beyond the natural.
billy kidd ummmmmmmm, a baby is a body inside a body so what you are saying doesnt make sense........also a baby is made by TWO people, not one........so your other point is invalid also, man you are making us pro-choice look so stupid when you completely miss the obvious........it has to make sense to gain any traction, stop repeating the same brain dead statements
Stephen Meyer's book The Signature in the Cell lays the final nail in the coffin of Darwinian macro-evolution.
It makes me angry to know that a failed hypothesis is taught as fact in our schools. We must take up the fight again for the sake of intellectual honesty.
Sassy they are desperate. They need something against God. This ridiculous theory is the only thing they have. But their strategy is to make it so complicated that the masses don’t understand so they just blindly follow
Signature in the cell really doesn't really make any attempt to debunk macr-evolution though...
Sassy... but, but, but, didn't you hear what "savior" of the world, the activist had to say? You're just one of those stupid people that need Darwinism beating into your thick head. You don't deserve to have your own thoughts. Only special people, like him, deserve to carry on and represent the human race.
It doesn't need to debunk macro evolution.. Because there is no such thing as biological evolution micro macro or otherwise.... Evolution is a religion of metaphysical naturalism and a fairytale.. good website for you! www.evolutionfairytale.com
@@DarkchocolateDX There is no evidence for macro-evolution, so there is nothing to debunk.
Thank you for guiding people towards the TRUTH, it is highly needed now
The one thing that is so obvious to me is our ability to communicate reason and understand words sentences and ideas. That is an extremely complex thing for the brain to do. But he has the problem. The brain doesn't do that. It's the spirit of man that Job talked about. The ability to speak reason etc is a spiritual entity within us. It is a part that God gave us from him. Because understanding language reason ideas is on a divine level.
This is so sad. How did people let these things happen? Do we ever know what’s going on under our noses?
It is obvious from the examples given that Darwin's ideas were from Satan. The idea being to destroy God's creation.
I've always been thinking🤔 about stuff like this thanks for speaking out John West this video was Amazing 😁
"Evolution is not fiction like Mother Goose where the cow jumps over the moon. A cow can jump a low fence so Mother Goose is straight forward fantasy that children enjoy. Inverted Mother Goose would be the moon jumping over the cow. That kind of inverted fantasy is what evolution is, the exact opposite of reality." Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo
"Corrosive" is actually the correct word.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Excellent video. Thank you Discovery.
My college biology teacher showed us those embryo drawings as an example of evolution. When you ask? Surely that must have been decades ago since they were known to be fraudulent a hundred years ago. Nope. It was in 2015 in college of all places.
I really love all your content. Have been a huge fan of Stephen Meyer and Michael Behe especially. Keep up your good works. May God support you all in your work.
Great points to ponder
It just occurred to me and that all the other types of Life on this planet, that are supposedly of equal value as humans, must have their own opinions. Are there any Facebook pages, or other social media platforms where we can talk to some of these equally valuable life forms? Surely, they should be allowed to speak for themselves.
You can draw a direct line from Darwin to Hitler.
A few months ago I worked with some great people on the Theory of Evolution. I will not lie and say that I did not enjoy it. I have a Degree in Environmental Biology and I am working on another degree in Neuroscience. I love science and while I lack the "senses divinitatus" that theist have, I admit that the standard story of evolution has massive holes. But if you speak out you will be called an idiot or risk losing your job. I do not reject evolution, I reject the versions taught in schools today. But most people tend to just parrot what they hear without actually being scientists themselves.
Darwin was a kooky character. he comes up with a theory to try and disprove God, (fails of course) but not without some casualties along the way. but then in his autobiography writes that "i believes that the universe was created by a mind similar to that of Man's, and for that i deserves to be called a theist." and some how this inconsistent wacko is praised as a great scientist.
When persisting in unbelief and godlessness the logical and reasonable argument will be avoided due to blinded thinking. Unbelief after all is alike addiction and sickness, and getting out of it by our own is not easy. God must help or we go astray.
The fact that an idea has negative repercussions does not mean that the idea is wrong.
Your correct that an idea having negative repercussions does not make the idea wrong , but when the
idea is wrong and causes repercussions , then it's not right.
Wow lost for words really
I'm a retired biologist and believe it or not in my college days it was an atheist evolutionist, the late Lynn Margulis that turned me off of Darwin. It was her insistence that Neo-Darwinism's processes could not have made the innovations that we see that took place like why would a kidney/liver evolve? Not by mutations nor Natural Selection, so she developed her Endosymbiosis Theory.
I thought she was the first to come up with the pithy saying that Natural Selection only explains the survival of the fittest and not the arrival of the fittest. It had been used many years before in the late 19th Century though, but I got her point that the way Natural Selection is talked about you'd think it was magical and could create all the wonders we see in the biological world. With harmful mutations to help it along of course.
I’m a retired MD and in my pre-med days, the prevailing assumption of professors was abiogenesis/phylogenetic tree of life paradigm. As I studied pre-med and medical school, I could see how insane that paradigm is. There are interdependencies in cellular and physiological processes that make it impossible that Magic Molecules could have “created themselves”so as to interdependently work together to obtain energy, break down energy, maintain homeostasis, etc.
As “they say”, it’s chicken-egg problems from top to bottom! Without a cell membrane you can’t get organelles grouped together; but you can’t get a cell membrane without organelles; you can’t get organelles without DNA; you can’t get DNA without proteins; you can’t get proteins without DNA and organelles. It’s crazy! We are created. Simple as that.
I also disbelieve that mitochondria are endosymbionts.
'The Truth Will Always Be There, Whether You Believe It Or Not'
I love the series. I have concerns with the widely accepted idea amongst christian thinkers that man has an eternal soul and a hell of fire These are extremely popular and conflicting doctrines in churches but which receive no support from Bible revelations and are medieval theology. The Bible is very clear to say that God only is immortal and that man is an indivisible being. Instead of desembodied destinies the Bible presents the Resurection of the last days. No where it says dead people are in the glory upon dying. Hell. sheol in Hebrew means grave and not an eternal place of torment. Something absurdly contrary with any conceivable punishments. Instead the Bible says to believe so that they will not PERISH. and this is all portrayed in the Bible
Instead modern Christianity thru these very strange twisting of the Bible has made it even harder for others to believe.
I think I saw some issues told on this video on that documentary movie Expelled: No intelligence Allowed done by Ben Stein. The issue that third right had a secret project genome using Darwin’s theory of evolution to contribute to it. By the way great video.
Thanks for this
I dont know mr, i listened to the whole presentation and i am intrigued by this “intelligent design” idea but i am still firm on atheism and evolution theory.
If we aren’t an intelligent design then why does anything man has created even exist. Why do we have institutions for learning?
This video is eye-opening!! Thank you for your work. What is the intelligent design stand on the head skulls of the primates that evolutionists conclude evolve into human skulls. Are the dating methods wrong for the skulls? Are they really showing progression over time? Are the intelligent design biologists working on this?
Forever "grateful" to great Leslie Nielsen for being in my brain 'till the day I die. Surely you understand what I mean "stop calling me Shirley" no matter the time or place. Funerals included. The man ruined me forever.
One word: Beethoven.
Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)
Hey I caught you on another video. I’m also a retired MD. It seems to me that MDs have a more “humanist” view of the same biological processes that PhDs study, and it’s easier for MDs to “see” just how impossible it is that abiogenesis/phylogenetic tree of life is a true paradigm. Maybe it’s because we are looking at the trees but also see the forest; whereas PhDs only look at the trees. Maybe it’s the multidisciplinary aspect of Medicine that makes us see the exquisite interdependencies of all organs and physiological systems that make an evolutionary hypothesis impossible. What good is a retina without a cerebral cortex? What good is a cornea without a lens? What good is a single cranial nucleus three unless you have it working in concert with four and six and the pupils and the extra ocular muscles?! How could things evolve stepwise?! How could you evolve into an electron transport chain stepwise?! Or the Kreb’s cycle?!
I don’t understand atheist materialist scientific worldview at all if you have studied these things!
Thoughts?!
Michael Denton PhD on 31:31 excellent statement !!!
Natural Law is enough to show we are not like other animals... but all is pointing towards a beginning and a God
Can you add subtitles in Turkish
I'm 18 seconds in and I just wanna say....it wasn't Charles Darwin's corrosive idea. It was James Hutton's corrosive idea. Then Charles Lyell took over and Charles Darwin went forward with what he "learned" from Hutton and Lyel. So put the blame where blame belongs! Darwin is just a "stooge".
Atheists will never accept that their darling Darwin was a racist or allow his statues to be taken down.
Well we have to dislikes by the darwinists
Two
Nagel does not try to refute evolution, and you should've made that apparent; Darwin himself couldn't be considered a "neo-Darwinist".
"The material universe is all there is" unfortunately 96% of it is missing!
Here's the difference, the theories that we ourselves try and develop that show how we got here, can and will evolve over time. But these theories have evidence that is observable and tangible. So in 2020, we might not have a full scope of how humans have evolved on earth, but there is nothing that is saying we have to. There is no timeline to try and figure it all out. These theories change and evolve just like cell phones, cars, computers. But the idea that god created all this is stagnant. We can't do anything with that but just leave that right where it is. It isn't testable or observable. So if your satisfied by that statement that god created ALL THIS, then just live with that. But others who want more answers will try and search and develop those answers with or without god.
Most people define God down to justify their lifestyles.
Just semantics perhaps but doesn't the word "selection" in "natural selection" necessarily imply the ability to make one choice over another in the supposed "intent" to increase the chance of survival? If so does it not stand to reason that to make a choice requires the ability to make it as a result of a conscious act of volition and thus intelligence? If things in nature adjust and change by this mechanism then it stands to reason that things cannot be a coincidence. What came first "The chicken or the Egg"? If nature could speak to us in our own language we would be amazed I am sure.
@@lizd2943 were did the egg come from! Genius!
@@lizd2943 Would you care to elaborate please.
People do not have souls that survive death that is a pagan belief Genesis 3:19 ) In the sweat of your face you will eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken. For dust you are and to dust you will return.”
What inspired you Darwin that day in the falls, is the missing link of your theory. El que tenga oídos...
Aryan-Vedic Shastras are superior to Western Science. Those who dwell beyond the Indus know all that we know, have known for far longer, and know more than we know. They know more than our secular scientists can know, for their Shastras are informed by spiritual philosophies that span the Theistic to a-Theistic without reduction to material dogma.
And yet, our secular atheists worship Kali, sacrificing to her on a scale that would embarrass the Aztecs. The de-constructionists are right, up to a point: moral order and value are social constructs, whatever the underlying philosophy or even divine inspiration. Man has no value, but what he can hold in mutuality within a polity, culture or faith, and to those beyond the marches of his polity, culture and faith. Then is his value measured by the value in which he holds others.
13:15 the title of the Book is "God is not Great" not "Why God is not Great". Christopher Hitchens may have been an ass, but he was telling the truth. Theres nothing with wrong with hoping that Heaven exists, but there is no evidence for it.
What evidence are you looking for when talking about another dimension or plain of existence? Don't talk about proof or evidence when talking about something that exists beyond the natural.
Made me sick to my stomach. Some are misguided, and some are downright evil.
satan swore by god that he would work hard disgrace the honor of human that god gave to adam
If its not your body, you need to back off. Abortion is solely decision of the carrier alone. Everyone else has no opinion.
Sad...that you think murder is justifiable .
billy kidd ummmmmmmm, a baby is a body inside a body so what you are saying doesnt make sense........also a baby is made by TWO people, not one........so your other point is invalid also, man you are making us pro-choice look so stupid when you completely miss the obvious........it has to make sense to gain any traction, stop repeating the same brain dead statements
Use protection, avoid moral dilemmas
The baby is also seperate from the carrrier, in that the baby has its own DNA.