Excellent work Pete. After dismantling nl25 be cool to see you progress through nl50,100 and as high as you like. Zoom or reg games, nothing better than Pete Clark playing cards
Glad to see the series seems to working well Pete! Another way to gain some unique page views, and more eyes on your course, would be to target specific concepts. Could probably go as simple as you like to avoid giving away too much content for free (opening ranges, pot odds, equity & fold equity etc) all pretty solid long life content.
I appreciate your hard work and the knowledge you share in these videos Pete! Great content, great format, and I learn a lot. Thank you so much for sharing your poker wisdom!
These videos are definitely great. Are there any specific rules you would additionally apply to NL2 or NL5 where players are going to be calling stations a lot and 3 betting is much rarer?
The logical follow up to this is: 3bet more often or stronger yourself (depending on the rec), bluff less in spots where people are not going to fold (i.e. A high boards) and go super thin for value!
"geometric" is maybe not the best word to describe the sizing, but it's not totally off either. You're choosing bet sizes such that the pot sizes on the remaining streets form a geometric sequence (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression). In other words, the ratios between the pots on successive streets are equal.
also, as you mentioned, it's probably not super-important to know or use for real-life poker strategy, but I think you can derive that it's an optimal bet size in a toy game where you are perfectly polarized (nuts or air) and your opponent has only bluff catchers.
only thing i would disagree with iun practice is always folding to the big overshoves like the last hand with AQo, I would say in my microstakes pool, players who do this are often holding complete air. I find players try too hard to get called with their value hands and are scared to bet huge, or occasionally are jamming vulnerable hands like said. I see this all the time with random gutshots or flush draws.
crazy how low views you get when this is the best poker content for genuinely progressing
aw man. MORE OF THIS. Effin gold af. love it.
love this format looking forward for ep3 !
Excellent work Pete. After dismantling nl25 be cool to see you progress through nl50,100 and as high as you like. Zoom or reg games, nothing better than Pete Clark playing cards
Love this format Pete - this is incredibly high value content to be giving away for free. Lucky viewers! 😎
Glad to see the series seems to working well Pete! Another way to gain some unique page views, and more eyes on your course, would be to target specific concepts. Could probably go as simple as you like to avoid giving away too much content for free (opening ranges, pot odds, equity & fold equity etc) all pretty solid long life content.
I appreciate your hard work and the knowledge you share in these videos Pete! Great content, great format, and I learn a lot. Thank you so much for sharing your poker wisdom!
Really like this format and thanks for the video.
Love your teaching style 👌🏼
great vid, more like this at 50nl would be awesome as well!
These videos are definitely great. Are there any specific rules you would additionally apply to NL2 or NL5 where players are going to be calling stations a lot and 3 betting is much rarer?
The logical follow up to this is: 3bet more often or stronger yourself (depending on the rec), bluff less in spots where people are not going to fold (i.e. A high boards) and go super thin for value!
"geometric" is maybe not the best word to describe the sizing, but it's not totally off either. You're choosing bet sizes such that the pot sizes on the remaining streets form a geometric sequence (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression). In other words, the ratios between the pots on successive streets are equal.
also, as you mentioned, it's probably not super-important to know or use for real-life poker strategy, but I think you can derive that it's an optimal bet size in a toy game where you are perfectly polarized (nuts or air) and your opponent has only bluff catchers.
Great content once more! Clear and usefull concepts
Great format. Thanks pete!
Great format! Thank you!
Nice! thanks for the gold content! subscribed
Great stuff Pete!
priceless! thank you Pete
I do love the series
Thanks for the video!
How do I reach you directly and get coaching?
Check description :)
Rule #5 is a good one the players are too passive on the river 💯
NL2 my friend would be great 😁
good video
Nice
nice
only thing i would disagree with iun practice is always folding to the big overshoves like the last hand with AQo, I would say in my microstakes pool, players who do this are often holding complete air. I find players try too hard to get called with their value hands and are scared to bet huge, or occasionally are jamming vulnerable hands like said. I see this all the time with random gutshots or flush draws.
PETE TEH GOAT. for the algo
Just bad plays, to create weak players.
Hahaha just worst first edvice 🤣 cbet with everything. Just for donks. 👎
Ikr that is some extremely outdated advice