All the lions did bite the sheep at the same time? Since they figured out that all the other lions would go for the lonely sheep, and they didnt want to be without a bite.
logic would not prevent the lions from eating after seeing one eat the sheep and turning even if they saw the feeding -- no where does it say that the rest of the lions were watching when the first one ate nor does it state that the rest of the lions wanted to be the king of the jungle.
@@commenteroftruth9790 Maybe they were so intelligent they understood lions have an insanely higher basal metabolic rate than sheep, which leads to them constantly being under pressure to hunt. Where as sheep, as unintelligent as they are, are given food and shelter by the sheppard, and therefore, they long to become the sheep
@@jacobrichardson5018 knowledge and intelligence are different things. You shouldnt need to know the deeper biology or hunting habits of a lion for a riddle.
If any lion ate the sheep due to hunger, he would transform into a sheep too, and this cycle would repeat itself over and over again until only 1 sheep is left alive (and 10 dead sheep) This question doesn't really make much sense in the long run xD
@@jax8668 yep, end answer is 1 sheep. Of course if you came back before the end, you would have 1 sheep any number 1 to 10 lions depending on when you returned.
#2 is more of a riddle than a logic puzzle. interestingly #4 also has more than one way to reach the conclusion, for instance michael couldn't be the murderers brother, since he lived in a rural area and jack and his brother grew up in chicago
That is the way to go!!! He is even wrong in the video with his interpretation that Michael is dead and Jeffrey alive.. Assuming that Jeffrey killed Micheal but he forgot that both Micheal and Jeffrey can be alive and that one of the 2 Marathon runners is murdered..
No, you make the assumption that he was living in a rural area before moving to the city. He could have just been living in a suburban house far from the city and wanted to practice farming.
The only really logical puzzles are the "True colors" and the "Box with the toy car". The "Who's the murderer" doesn't tell you that Michael is the one killed. The other ones rely on nonsense ("Lions and magic", "A bridge guarded 24/7 and well lit...")
#3: you clearly said “no citizen is allowed to leave” so does that mean the merchant isn’t a citizen? It’s smart, but choose your words wisely or else the riddle is LITERALLY impossible.
No.4 can be done in two other ways if I'm correct. Other way 1: say to Jack who his brother is, he is in isolation so he should break after awhile. Other way 2: if the murderer got a leg amputation we could look through all the hospitals in the town looking for Jack's last name because they're brothers until they find the murderer's name.
In number 4, I was able to follow the logic about who the murderer was, but I can't figure out what logic was used to determine that Michael was dead. By my logic it could be either Michael or Damian that could be the victims and there's nothing in those statements that could narrow that down.
#4 You came to the right conclusion but by the wrong means. Micheal is not the killer but not because Jeffrey plans on building a computer with Ben but because the killer grew up in Chicago with Jack and Michael was considering becoming a farmer before moving to the city which means he didn't grew up in the city.
The way Problem #5 was stated was rather confusing. Might've been better to label the boxes with 1,2,3 and the assertions with A,B,C. At first, it kind of sounded like there was some connection between each box and assertion.
Damien was the killer. He had a prosthetic leg when he ran the marathon. It also said that he was with "one of the innocent people in the group" you could imply that he isn't innocent because it doesn't say "another innocent"
Unless there are multiple people with amputated legs in that room, why would the detective need multiple clues beyond "the murderer underwent a leg amputation a month ago" to figure out who the murderer was?
or you could do it like this the text balloon from the guy in the middle says: Mr Blue, you're right. Giving us a hint that Mr. Blue is on the right side from the middle guy.. which is the one with the red shirt.. then the other 2 are obvious..
Riddle: A man enters a shop, wants to return some items, but is declined cuz he doesn't have the receipt and left the shop with the items. The thing is that he had the same amount of money before and after getting those items. How did he do that? Answer: he just took, them, pretended to own them and got out of there
Last one: Box 1: said had toy car in it Box 2: said didn’t have you car in it Box 3: said Box 1 had no toy in it Box 3 said Box 1 had no toy in it, excluding Box 1 Box 2 said there was no toy inside The answer must be Box 3, because none of the boxes said Box three had the toy inside.
That’s not the Riddle works. He said that only one of the boxes is telling the truth and the one that is telling the truth is box 3, but since the other two are lying and box 2 said it isn’t in there he is lying and the car is there
But the riddle says that only 1 of the boxes is telling the truth. If box 3 has the toy, then boxes 2 and 3 are telling the truth. That breaks one of the riddle's rules. If it were in Box 2, then only Box 3 would be telling the truth.
Like the rest of the comments said riddle #2 is incorrect. If ALL the animals are intelligent and rational then multiple answers could occur. They could rationalize to share the sheep eating it simultaneously, the sheep could bargain with the lions to not eat it at all and become herbivore (remember Narnia is a magical place), or none of them could eat the sheep and they decide to eat the guy watching all them YOU.
for the lion one; its dumb the answer SHOULD be 1 sheep, since if every lion ate a sheep and became a sheep that would leave one left, since the others are eaten
Writing down my answers before I hear the solutions 1. Man in white is Mr. Red, Man in red is Mr. Blue, man in blue is Mr. White 2. Either 1 sheep & 10 lions or 2 sheep & 9 lions 3. The merchant went under the bridge 4. Jeffrey is the murderer 5. Box 2 So I got 2 and a half right
1: Blue, red, white 2: 11 sheep, 0 lions ohhhhhh 3:He went on a boat under the bridge oh aokee 4:Damian??? Umm, someone can still run a marathon with one leg 5: Box 2
The #2 solution is not the intended one. It makes it look like you copied this riddle without reading the answer thoroughly. It is clear Bright Side has never read The Chronicles of Narnia before. This is a classic game theory problem where the endgame can determine whether the first sheep is eaten. Assuming all lions are rational and know that all other lions are also rational: If there is 1 lion, then it will obviously just eat the sheep. If there are 2 lions, then neither lion will eat the sheep as the other lion will just eat it afterwards. If there are 3 lions, then the first lion to get to the sheep will eat it, reducing this down to the “2 lions” scenario, where neither of the 2 remaining lions will try to eat the newly made sheep. Continuing down this path of logical reason, for if the number of lions is even, then the sheep will not be eaten. However, if it is odd, one lion will eat the sheep and no other lions will eat the new sheep. Because the scenario in this video has 10 lions at the beginning, the sheep will not be eaten, and the 10 lions will stay lions. QED
If the lions were not aware that if one ate the sheep they would also turn into a sheep, then in the end there would be 8 lions, 1 living sheep, and 2 dead sheep
Lol my solution for #4 was a lot darker: I thought that Michael was the murderer and Jack was the murdered. You technically ARE in isolation if you're 6 feet under and you need both your legs to run a farm, which Michael was going to do but decided not to. I figured the murderer would be in jail so I thought it couldn't have been Jeffery or Benedict because Jeffery planned to make a computer for Benedict next week, and one of the facts said that they had constructed their last computers together. I just assumed the two computers were the same... XD And like the video said, you need both your legs to run a marathon, so it couldn't have been Damian.
The first one is funny because it literally tells you the answer as it's giving the riddle. "Mr. Blue, Mr. Red, and Mr. White, who all want to be the French flag" like,,, he names them in order.
Number for could also be that Jeffery is the murderer and jack was he one who died. If he’s been dead since the crime then he would most likely be in isolation. Damian ran a marathon( not the murderer). Benedict got equated with jack six months ago (not jacks brother). Micheal didn’t grow up in the city which means he didn’t grow up with jack. So Jeffery killed his brother
*If he was a clever merchant that would mean he is most likely rich and could've have bribed the guard or escaped at a winter night so it's really dark and the guard probably couldn't see him. The merchant could've also just swam over the river or called someone outside the city and asked someone to pick him up, there are too many ways you could solve this but yeah... they went with the weirdest one imo. He could've also killed the guard or make up a distraction inside the city near the walls or something.*
I figured he would have either gone under the bridge where the guard couldn't see him, or the complete other side of the wall where again, the guard couldn't see him, because the ONE guard is keeping an eye on the bridge, so therefore the far side of the town would be unguarded.
I also believe that, originally, this riddle was meant to be that as the killer grew up in Chicago, he wouldn't be the type of guy that would consider becoming a farmer (Michael's description), but even that explanation is kind of lame..
Michael moved to a city. So he didn’t grow up there. The murderer misses a leg. Most marathons can’t be runs by somebody with one leg. No matter if he has a fake leg
For number 3 there are 2 ways! 1. The way they did 2. He can walk for 5 mins an the duck under the bridge and then when he goes inside and walk the rest of the way
But what’s to say, in 4, that Damian is still alive. All it says is that the he ran a marathon the day before with an innocent person. And that he WAS a heavy drinker. It could be that he is no longer because he is dead. And in that case, the murderer would still be Jeffrey (it could’ve been Michael if it weren’t for the fact that he moved to the city and the murderer grew up in Chicago with Jack, since it could be that he gave up on becoming a farmer when he lost his leg.)
I stopped at question #2. In the presentation of the riddle, you showed continuous gobbling of lion-turned sheep. Now the deciding answer to the riddle is when will it all stop? And I don;t think it is logical to conclude that lions don't want to become sheep if they are intelligent.
Michael can't be the killer because he had been wanting to be a farmer BEFORE moving to the city. Meanwhile Jacks brother is the killer, his brother whom he had grown up with in chicago. I legit did a whole grid of possibilities for that one and the only logical conclusion i came to was jeff being the killer, everyone else had reasons as to why they COULDNT be the killer.
The actual answer to #2 makes sense but not for the reason that you explained. They aren’t not eating the sheep because they “want to stay king of the jungle”- because by that logic they could have many unpredictable reasons for eating it or not and therefore different numbers. The actual reason would be that they know that if they eat a sheep, they’ll definitely be killed by the remaining lions, which is way more likely than starving. So yes, nine lions and one sheep would remain.
But what about starvation One of the lions would give in sooner or later, and eat the sheep This cycle would repeat in the long run, but as the video said, the animals were left unattended for a while, soo yes the animals would remain the same (and alive)
Okay first of all, this is about the first question, as you can see Mr. White is all the way on the left, Mr. Blue in the middle, Mr. Red is on the right, based on this information, it should be that the man in the red shirt when he takes his jacket off is Mr. White, the man in the middle with a white shirt when his jacket is off has to be Mr. Blue, and Mr. Red is in a blue shirt when his jacket is off unless in this scene they switched places.
#2: 2 sheeps (1 dead + 1 alive) and 9 lions, unless 1 or some af the 9 lions wants to be a sheep #4: Amputees do run marathons (www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4422126/Marine-amputee-runs-Boston-Marathon-American-flag.html), not everybody runs to win, some do others reasons like support for a cause, training for ironman or just to be able to tell themself "I did a marathon".
Gods sake, on the first one when the guy said "yeah you're right" I thought u were supposed to take it literally, like, he was talking to the guy on the right and said Ur right, and because on the French flag it's red on the right, the guy on the right would be Mr red, and I went from there
#2 MAGIC LAND: Though lions are smart, but the magical ship's magic would only last on the lion that ate it. Other lions could eat it. Means that the animation would prove to be misleading?
hmm 1st one: -red can't be red -white can't be white or blue (has to be red) -blue can't be blue since white is red that means there's only 2 colors left, white and blue, blue can't be mr. blue so that means blue is mr. white and red is mr. blue
For number 4 you can also tell its not Michael because he moved to the city and Jack and his brother grew up in Chicago. If you move to the city, that means you are in a rural area prior to moving. If Michael grew up in Chicago, he wouldnt be able to move to the city because hes already in the city
Thought the murderer was Damian The murdered person was Benedict Damian might got a leg trouble during a marathon He ran with another person which might be Jack cuz he's Damian's brother Benedict acquainted with Jack makes the job easier Jeff and Benedict made their last computer together means... One of them got murdered which is Benedict Jack got Isolated cuz he's the closest to Benedict AM I RIGHT? (cuz I supposed to be)
#1 all we know for certain based on the conditions given is that mr red is wearing a white shirt, mr blue is not wearing blue, and mr white is not wearing white. We were only told the shirt colors were contradictory to their names, not that the matched another's name.
Here’s how to do it. Let’s start with blue. Mr blue can’t be wearing a blue shirt, and remember that the white shirt guy said “Yeah mr blue you’re right” so if mr blue is wearing a white shirt, he would be talking to himself. So mr blue can’t be wearing white, so that leaves us with the red shirt, so mr blue is wearing red. For mr white, it can’t be the white or red shirt because mr blue is already taken by the red shirt. So mr white is wearing blue and mr red is wearing white.
Wait... the last riddle by me: the second one can not be it, because it says it. The first one could be it, but the third one says it isn't in it. But noone said anything about third one. That means it is in the third one! If you tell me it is not then I am done with my brain
The second box has the car and the third statement is true. I’ll tell you why. The argument states that only one of the three statements can be true. If statement 1 is true: If statement 1 is true then the other two statements must be false. Only when statement 1 is true, only statement 3 is false. It’s true that if the car is in box one that the car cannot be in box 2 so statement 2 is true. That means the car is not in box 1. If statement 2 is true: If statement 2 is true then the other two statements must be false. Only when statement 2 is true, statement 3 is also true. If the car is in box 2 then it is not in box 1. That means that statement 2 must be false. The car must be in box 2. If statement 3 is true: If statement 3 is true then the other two statements must be false. This is the only case in which this term holds true. If it is true that there isn’t a car in box 1, then statement one is false. The car must be in box 2 making statement two false. That means that only statement 3 is true and that the car must be in box 2!
There's no stipulation that the denizens of the town don't have paperwork to enter their own town, or that the guard waits for them to get there when he sees them coming instead of merely checking to see what's going on.
#1 he’s trying to leave so obviously he’s not bringing paperwork to get in. #2 if the guard didn’t wait for them to get there then the merchant could’ve just turned and ran after the sharpshooter left his post.
In the first riddle, why is it impossible for Mr. Blue to be wearing the white shirt? The solution given is that Mr. Blue -> Red shirt Mr. White -> Blue shirt Mr. Red -> White shirt But wouldn’t Mr. Blue -> White shirt Mr. White -> Red shirt Mr. Red -> Blue shirt also meet the conditions? I’m sure I’m missing something but this is really tripping me up lol.
Bertram0804 yes it is. For example, what if you had a black chalkboard and you used a white chalk? Isn't it the same as using a blue chalk? If you could use a chalk that's blue, which is a color, than using a white chalk means that they're the same and they are both colors.
Actually, white and black are not colors. They are both an absence of color. The only difference is that one reflects the light, while the other repels it.
Explanation: Only one sentence is correct. Other two are lies. The 1st box can't have a car inside, because that would mean that the second one is a lie. The 2nd box sentence can't be true, because that would be a nonsence (try it). The 3rd sentence is true because: 1: not in this one(it's false) 2: in this one (false) 3: not in the first one(true).(this is thr only one that can be correct, others are false) Answer: the car is in box number 2.
Evan Vassil Wrong. If the first is true, then the second has to be true. If the second was true, the first and third can not be both wrong. If the first doesn't have it, as a lie, it would make the third sentence true. If the third sentence lied, the first would be true. So in the process of elimination the third is true. But that doesn't mean the car is in that box. If it is true, it is not in the first box. So the 2nd is lying just like the first. In conclusion, the answer is actually the second box.
#3 i was thinking about the trick were you steal a item by secretly picking it off the shelf then try to return it but since you don’t have the receipt they say you cant and then you leave with it.
1. Easy, you just need to use a table. 2. Also easy, because the lions will know the consequences. Only 9 lions and 2 sheep. 3. Oh… 4. This was hard. 5. Easy.
I would argue that Damian could be the murderer because he could have had his leg amputated from an accident he was in after drinking heavily and it's unfair to say an amputee can't run a marathon and the innocent person could have been his brother there for support.
The last one can also be 3 because box 1 says in this one. Box 2 says NOT in this one. But box 3 says not in the 1st one... so it can be in box 3 aswell. That was my answer, what do u guys think
#3 No one said the king is dumb- because the sharpshooter doesn't see the merchant entering the bridge so he assume the merchant was trying to escape and shoots him.
Second riddle: the first lion who eats a sheep gets a sheep in his tummy, and protected by the fact of other lions not eating him for the fear they could turn them into sheeps aswell makes him safe, but there could lay the possibility that every lion thought so, keeping them eating sheep and getting turned into one, until the last lion who was sure that there could be no lion to eat him. So, 1 sheep left at the end, 0 lions
and even if your thought process was correct, there would be 1 sheep and 1 lion, because why would the last lion become a sheep for protection if there’s no other lions.
I got 3/5, but I honestly think #2 shouldnt count. If they are logical and rational why do they need to be watched to begin with? Even if they do, theyre rational, so they wouldnt eat the sheep because the watcher would get in trouble. They are many explanations for this one. Dont mix magic with logic...
The true colours puzzle is even easier then you think... The middle guy gives a hint: mr. blue you're right, which you can also read as that mr. blue is on the right side from the guy in the middle, and since the middle guy cant be white he must be red.. so from left to right you got blue, red, white.. Also on puzzle #4 you have made a mistake.. you did figure out the answer, as it only asks you to identify the murderer. But the way you did it was wrong. In the end you say you got Michael and Jeffrey left. That Jeffrey is alive is correct. BUT CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG, MICHAEL CAN BE ALIVE ASWELL, AND THE KILLED PERSON COULD BE ONE OF THE 2 MARATHON RUNNERS! you can't figure out who the person was that got killed. But you can figure out that the killer wasn't Michael, cause he didnt grew up in a city, but on a farm before he moved to a city, while the 2 brothers spent their youth together in Chicago. and #5 was also easy that it could only be box #2 I didnt found the solution myself on 2 and 3.. just on 1, 4 and 5
The sheep and lion conclusion is in correct. The only answer is no lions and one sheep. You posed that the lions are logical. Therefore being that there is no other food source available to the lions, in this puzzle, then they will either all die from starvation or they will eat the sheep. Either way you end up with no lions and one sheep. Unless, of course, they all eat the sheep together, turn into sheep themselves and graze on the grass.
My Argument for your second one - Since all animals are rational, and the Lion their King, NO LION WOULD EAT THE SHEEP IN THE FIRST PLACE, as THEY ALREADY KNOW THAT IS GOING TO TURN THEM TO SHEEP.
TIMESTAMPS
True colors 0:20
Magical land 1:43
A strict king and a clever merchant 3:03
Who’s the murderer 4:44
Which box is the toy car in? 6:42
The bow was number 3 i knew it!!!
Box****
BRIGHT SIDE and
9 truo 3
alllllll........
Riddle two: Any answer is correct, as long as there is a magical power that you can explain your answer with.
Dozo G i
Dozo G the lions wanted to become sheeps
The lions weren't together.
the sheep bit the lion
All the lions did bite the sheep at the same time? Since they figured out that all the other lions would go for the lonely sheep, and they didnt want to be without a bite.
#2 is so dumb how can you just “figure out” that lions would understand the consequences
Exactly. I thought there would be 11 sheep in the end, 10 of which would be dead.
Yeah one would think that but it said in the beginning that they were “intelligent and rational”
Cyndi Garcia at least one person in this convo is smart. I assumed it would've been 1 sheep and 10 lions.
I agree, but for a different reason. The infographic intentionally lead us down the garden path.
They are magical!!!! , he said
logic would not prevent the lions from eating after seeing one eat the sheep and turning even if they saw the feeding -- no where does it say that the rest of the lions were watching when the first one ate nor does it state that the rest of the lions wanted to be the king of the jungle.
Exactly. And what if I decided to separate the sheep and lions by USING LOGIC.
By the same logic a lion would be safe if he ate a sheep since the other lions didn't want the same fate....
rericks the nerd the Lions would starve if they didn't eat a sheep
In some places lions are king of the Jungle but not everywhere. Some areas Elephants are.
Nor does it state that the rest don't wamt to be turned into sheep
2nd puzzle requires an understanding of motivation not presented to solve. I can't know that the lions don't want to be lions until you tell me.
They were described as highly intelligent. Thats your motivation. You are inserting bias.
@@commenteroftruth9790 Maybe they were so intelligent they understood lions have an insanely higher basal metabolic rate than sheep, which leads to them constantly being under pressure to hunt. Where as sheep, as unintelligent as they are, are given food and shelter by the sheppard, and therefore, they long to become the sheep
@@jacobrichardson5018 knowledge and intelligence are different things. You shouldnt need to know the deeper biology or hunting habits of a lion for a riddle.
That was a riddle rather than puzzle
So a rational being would starve instead of turn into a sheep?
GameWorks12 That's what the Devil would have you believe...
Tim Owen so the person who made this video is.... him?
Ghost Angel No but every human can be influenced by the Devil. Have you ever seen the news?
If any lion ate the sheep due to hunger, he would transform into a sheep too, and this cycle would repeat itself over and over again until only 1 sheep is left alive (and 10 dead sheep)
This question doesn't really make much sense in the long run xD
@@jax8668 yep, end answer is 1 sheep. Of course if you came back before the end, you would have 1 sheep any number 1 to 10 lions depending on when you returned.
#2 is more of a riddle than a logic puzzle. interestingly #4 also has more than one way to reach the conclusion, for instance michael couldn't be the murderers brother, since he lived in a rural area and jack and his brother grew up in chicago
That is the way to go!!! He is even wrong in the video with his interpretation that Michael is dead and Jeffrey alive.. Assuming that Jeffrey killed Micheal but he forgot that both Micheal and Jeffrey can be alive and that one of the 2 Marathon runners is murdered..
Also I think that none of them are the murderer because it said that the murderer had gone to jail
@@waternelon213 it's says before moving to the city...
No, you make the assumption that he was living in a rural area before moving to the city. He could have just been living in a suburban house far from the city and wanted to practice farming.
The only really logical puzzles are the "True colors" and the "Box with the toy car".
The "Who's the murderer" doesn't tell you that Michael is the one killed.
The other ones rely on nonsense ("Lions and magic", "A bridge guarded 24/7 and well lit...")
There once lived a very strict king
Me: 1. he looks like a 5 year old 2. He looks very friendly
Me.. Is he kimjungu (however his name is spelled)
Kim jong un
#3: you clearly said “no citizen is allowed to leave” so does that mean the merchant isn’t a citizen? It’s smart, but choose your words wisely or else the riddle is LITERALLY impossible.
No.4 can be done in two other ways if I'm correct. Other way 1: say to Jack who his brother is, he is in isolation so he should break after awhile. Other way 2: if the murderer got a leg amputation we could look through all the hospitals in the town looking for Jack's last name because they're brothers until they find the murderer's name.
Third way: look at their legs.
The Melon God yeah really that’s what I was thinking
Trent Lindsey that was my exact thought and idea to solve it lol
Not to mention that the one with one leg is discriminated against. It's only logical if you assume he wouldn't run a marathon.
Well, the lions would starve to death, so eventually there Will be 1 sheep 0 lions
Melis Derveni nope 2 sheep and 0 lion because first one of lions must eat in order to be lesson for others 😁
Black [B] it would eat the sheep, making it the only sheep
In number 4, I was able to follow the logic about who the murderer was, but I can't figure out what logic was used to determine that Michael was dead. By my logic it could be either Michael or Damian that could be the victims and there's nothing in those statements that could narrow that down.
#4 You came to the right conclusion but by the wrong means. Micheal is not the killer but not because Jeffrey plans on building a computer with Ben but because the killer grew up in Chicago with Jack and Michael was considering becoming a farmer before moving to the city which means he didn't grew up in the city.
The way Problem #5 was stated was rather confusing. Might've been better to label the boxes with 1,2,3 and the assertions with A,B,C. At first, it kind of sounded like there was some connection between each box and assertion.
Damien was the killer. He had a prosthetic leg when he ran the marathon. It also said that he was with "one of the innocent people in the group" you could imply that he isn't innocent because it doesn't say "another innocent"
Hey guys! Did you solve at least one riddles? Who solved all of them?
2
I answered the second one NONE cause if they eat each other there will be none of them
1 😣😣😣
The one in the thumbnail
I couldn't.. Plz give some easy puzzles only the 99% cn solve😂😂😂
Unless there are multiple people with amputated legs in that room, why would the detective need multiple clues beyond "the murderer underwent a leg amputation a month ago" to figure out who the murderer was?
0:53 figured it out as you were speaking. Mr. Blue is wearing red. Mr. White is wearing blue. And Mr. Red is obviously wearing white.
or you could do it like this the text balloon from the guy in the middle says: Mr Blue, you're right. Giving us a hint that Mr. Blue is on the right side from the middle guy.. which is the one with the red shirt.. then the other 2 are obvious..
That merchant who crossed the bridge without documentation was GENIUS 😂🤣😂🤣
COULDN'T HAVE SOLVED THAT MYSTERY EVEN AFTER MONTHS!!!
NICE VIDEO
He could have just NOT crossed the bridge.
Riddle: A man enters a shop, wants to return some items, but is declined cuz he doesn't have the receipt and left the shop with the items. The thing is that he had the same amount of money before and after getting those items. How did he do that?
Answer: he just took, them, pretended to own them and got out of there
Last one:
Box 1: said had toy car in it
Box 2: said didn’t have you car in it
Box 3: said Box 1 had no toy in it
Box 3 said Box 1 had no toy in it, excluding Box 1
Box 2 said there was no toy inside
The answer must be Box 3, because none of the boxes said Box three had the toy inside.
Lucario Gamer yeah I agree. I don’t like that question because of the answer.
That’s not the Riddle works. He said that only one of the boxes is telling the truth and the one that is telling the truth is box 3, but since the other two are lying and box 2 said it isn’t in there he is lying and the car is there
Exactly.
Dosen't matter because it said that it was in box one; correct answers: either box one or three
But the riddle says that only 1 of the boxes is telling the truth. If box 3 has the toy, then boxes 2 and 3 are telling the truth. That breaks one of the riddle's rules. If it were in Box 2, then only Box 3 would be telling the truth.
Like the rest of the comments said riddle #2 is incorrect. If ALL the animals are intelligent and rational then multiple answers could occur. They could rationalize to share the sheep eating it simultaneously, the sheep could bargain with the lions to not eat it at all and become herbivore (remember Narnia is a magical place), or none of them could eat the sheep and they decide to eat the guy watching all them YOU.
I Solved 3! Did My Hardwork To Solve It! (Atleast I Tried My Best! :D)
for the lion one; its dumb
the answer SHOULD be 1 sheep, since if every lion ate a sheep and became a sheep that would leave one left, since the others are eaten
#2: what if the lions have memory loss or are hungry af, you can't chuck in "oh they are smart" into the equation
1.Secondary Colors
2.9 sheeps and 1 lion or 10 sheeps and no lion
3.He ran or sneaked of
4.I did not understand
5.3rd Box
He went under the bridge?
Or swam...
Or killed the sharpshooter...
Or bribed the sharpshooter...
Hi bright side it’s really nice to see your videos
The murderer is Jack's brother. Got that wrong.
1:41 that one has multiple answers. Mr. Red could be wearing blue, Mr Blue wearing white, and Mr White wearing red.
The last one was the easiest one.
Writing down my answers before I hear the solutions
1. Man in white is Mr. Red, Man in red is Mr. Blue, man in blue is Mr. White
2. Either 1 sheep & 10 lions or 2 sheep & 9 lions
3. The merchant went under the bridge
4. Jeffrey is the murderer
5. Box 2
So I got 2 and a half right
I'm the 1000th comment :D
I FEEL SO SPECIAL
also I want nothing I'm just stating facts =)
XD
1: Blue, red, white
2: 11 sheep, 0 lions ohhhhhh
3:He went on a boat under the bridge oh aokee
4:Damian??? Umm, someone can still run a marathon with one leg
5: Box 2
The #2 solution is not the intended one. It makes it look like you copied this riddle without reading the answer thoroughly. It is clear Bright Side has never read The Chronicles of Narnia before.
This is a classic game theory problem where the endgame can determine whether the first sheep is eaten.
Assuming all lions are rational and know that all other lions are also rational:
If there is 1 lion, then it will obviously just eat the sheep.
If there are 2 lions, then neither lion will eat the sheep as the other lion will just eat it afterwards.
If there are 3 lions, then the first lion to get to the sheep will eat it, reducing this down to the “2 lions” scenario, where neither of the 2 remaining lions will try to eat the newly made sheep.
Continuing down this path of logical reason, for if the number of lions is even, then the sheep will not be eaten. However, if it is odd, one lion will eat the sheep and no other lions will eat the new sheep.
Because the scenario in this video has 10 lions at the beginning, the sheep will not be eaten, and the 10 lions will stay lions.
QED
If the lions were not aware that if one ate the sheep they would also turn into a sheep, then in the end there would be 8 lions, 1 living sheep, and 2 dead sheep
7:48 Ironic how the only one saying they didn’t have it, had it
For no.3, I thought the merchant sold a fake watch that had a minute hand that moved slow.
I thought he either killed or bribed the sharpshooter.
And I though he wasn't a citizen of that city, so he could freely go home, as the prohibition were only for citizens
I thought the merchant was also the sharpshooter
Lol my solution for #4 was a lot darker:
I thought that Michael was the murderer and Jack was the murdered. You technically ARE in isolation if you're 6 feet under and you need both your legs to run a farm, which Michael was going to do but decided not to. I figured the murderer would be in jail so I thought it couldn't have been Jeffery or Benedict because Jeffery planned to make a computer for Benedict next week, and one of the facts said that they had constructed their last computers together. I just assumed the two computers were the same... XD And like the video said, you need both your legs to run a marathon, so it couldn't have been Damian.
The first one is funny because it literally tells you the answer as it's giving the riddle. "Mr. Blue, Mr. Red, and Mr. White, who all want to be the French flag" like,,, he names them in order.
Number for could also be that Jeffery is the murderer and jack was he one who died. If he’s been dead since the crime then he would most likely be in isolation. Damian ran a marathon( not the murderer). Benedict got equated with jack six months ago (not jacks brother). Micheal didn’t grow up in the city which means he didn’t grow up with jack. So Jeffery killed his brother
The clever merchant could of swam
He could have swum across, not could of.
*If he was a clever merchant that would mean he is most likely rich and could've have bribed the guard or escaped at a winter night so it's really dark and the guard probably couldn't see him. The merchant could've also just swam over the river or called someone outside the city and asked someone to pick him up, there are too many ways you could solve this but yeah... they went with the weirdest one imo. He could've also killed the guard or make up a distraction inside the city near the walls or something.*
Caspersreunite Bravo👏
MsBettyR. He could’ve swam across, not swum.
I figured he would have either gone under the bridge where the guard couldn't see him, or the complete other side of the wall where again, the guard couldn't see him, because the ONE guard is keeping an eye on the bridge, so therefore the far side of the town would be unguarded.
The first has 2 possibilities.Why can't mr blue have a white shirt?
Here's the second possibility:
Mr blue-white
Mr white-red
Mr red-blue
Because the white shirt guy said that Mr blue is right, so mr blue can’t have a white shirt.
What is the reason for Damien not being the victim?
Mahissimo that's my very question also! I believe the uploader haven't paid attention to that
He mistook potential killers for potential victims
I also believe that, originally, this riddle was meant to be that as the killer grew up in Chicago, he wouldn't be the type of guy that would consider becoming a farmer (Michael's description), but even that explanation is kind of lame..
Michael moved to a city. So he didn’t grow up there.
The murderer misses a leg. Most marathons can’t be runs by somebody with one leg. No matter if he has a fake leg
Except marathons HAVE been run by people with one leg, meaning Damian is can not be excluded.
For number 3 there are 2 ways!
1. The way they did
2. He can walk for 5 mins an the duck under the bridge and then when he goes inside and walk the rest of the way
Yeah I'm so bad at this.😐I only managed to get num 5 correct😥😥 **sigh** ... Oh well
But what’s to say, in 4, that Damian is still alive. All it says is that the he ran a marathon the day before with an innocent person. And that he WAS a heavy drinker. It could be that he is no longer because he is dead. And in that case, the murderer would still be Jeffrey (it could’ve been Michael if it weren’t for the fact that he moved to the city and the murderer grew up in Chicago with Jack, since it could be that he gave up on becoming a farmer when he lost his leg.)
I stopped at question #2. In the presentation of the riddle, you showed continuous gobbling of lion-turned sheep. Now the deciding answer to the riddle is when will it all stop? And I don;t think it is logical to conclude that lions don't want to become sheep if they are intelligent.
The lions would know after the first, that if they became sheep, the other lions might eat them.
In the magical land of Narnia... All moose/reindeers wear sunglasses, mustaches, and dress shirts with a tie
How do we know who died in the 4th night one, you never say
The2kGod Raah it killer can be michael too. Or damian could be killed
Michael can't be the killer because he had been wanting to be a farmer BEFORE moving to the city. Meanwhile Jacks brother is the killer, his brother whom he had grown up with in chicago.
I legit did a whole grid of possibilities for that one and the only logical conclusion i came to was jeff being the killer, everyone else had reasons as to why they COULDNT be the killer.
The actual answer to #2 makes sense but not for the reason that you explained. They aren’t not eating the sheep because they “want to stay king of the jungle”- because by that logic they could have many unpredictable reasons for eating it or not and therefore different numbers. The actual reason would be that they know that if they eat a sheep, they’ll definitely be killed by the remaining lions, which is way more likely than starving. So yes, nine lions and one sheep would remain.
But what about starvation
One of the lions would give in sooner or later, and eat the sheep
This cycle would repeat in the long run, but as the video said, the animals were left unattended for a while, soo yes the animals would remain the same (and alive)
😂 these puzzles are so confusing like my chemistry book
Writer's pouch what grade chemistry?
i got A+ 😂 by mistake
Writer's pouch please tell me you’re joking and aren’t really this dense, please.
Okay first of all, this is about the first question, as you can see Mr. White is all the way on the left, Mr. Blue in the middle, Mr. Red is on the right, based on this information, it should be that the man in the red shirt when he takes his jacket off is Mr. White, the man in the middle with a white shirt when his jacket is off has to be Mr. Blue, and Mr. Red is in a blue shirt when his jacket is off unless in this scene they switched places.
where is the logic in saying that Damien can't be the killer because he ran a marathon... that was the day before, it means nothing.
David Osborne Damien isn’t the killer because he ran a marathon while the murderer is supposed to have had a leg amputation a week ago!!
well, the leg amputation was a month ago, not a week, and while that might be pushing it, it doesn't pass for logic in my book.
What I can't see: Why is Michael the victim? He could be, but so does Damien.
Mahissimo The question here is who is the killer.. the victim could be Damien or Micheal! It doesn’t matter.
Yes, the question doesn't ask for the victim. But in the solution, they say that it was Michael. So either I missed some clue, or they made a mistake.
#2: 2 sheeps (1 dead + 1 alive) and 9 lions, unless 1 or some af the 9 lions wants to be a sheep
#4: Amputees do run marathons (www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4422126/Marine-amputee-runs-Boston-Marathon-American-flag.html), not everybody runs to win, some do others reasons like support for a cause, training for ironman or just to be able to tell themself "I did a marathon".
Gods sake, on the first one when the guy said "yeah you're right" I thought u were supposed to take it literally, like, he was talking to the guy on the right and said Ur right, and because on the French flag it's red on the right, the guy on the right would be Mr red, and I went from there
#2 MAGIC LAND: Though lions are smart, but the magical ship's magic would only last on the lion that ate it. Other lions could eat it. Means that the animation would prove to be misleading?
3:22 *cough cough* North Korea *cough cough*
OKM 5406 Exactly and he was like “Sound familiar”😂
hmm
1st one:
-red can't be red
-white can't be white or blue (has to be red)
-blue can't be blue
since white is red that means there's only 2 colors left, white and blue, blue can't be mr. blue so that means blue is mr. white and red is mr. blue
The 1st one is easy
Well isn't that nice.
Grace Leota all you had to do is put them in the order the narrator said them
Who said I didn't get it?? Lol
For number 4 you can also tell its not Michael because he moved to the city and Jack and his brother grew up in Chicago. If you move to the city, that means you are in a rural area prior to moving. If Michael grew up in Chicago, he wouldnt be able to move to the city because hes already in the city
What's the BRIGHT SIDE of this?
Thought the murderer was Damian
The murdered person was Benedict
Damian might got a leg trouble during a marathon
He ran with another person which might be Jack cuz he's Damian's brother
Benedict acquainted with Jack makes the job easier
Jeff and Benedict made their last computer together means...
One of them got murdered which is Benedict
Jack got Isolated cuz he's the closest to Benedict
AM I RIGHT? (cuz I supposed to be)
grassroots Michael being a farmer isn't helpful
TIP, DO THE THUMPNAIL FIRST, DAILYDOSEOFINTERNET DOES THAT TOO
King Ling oh yeah
The merchant and the murderer ones were really tricky.
I got only 2
#1
all we know for certain based on the conditions given is that mr red is wearing a white shirt, mr blue is not wearing blue, and mr white is not wearing white. We were only told the shirt colors were contradictory to their names, not that the matched another's name.
Here’s how to do it.
Let’s start with blue. Mr blue can’t be wearing a blue shirt, and remember that the white shirt guy said “Yeah mr blue you’re right” so if mr blue is wearing a white shirt, he would be talking to himself. So mr blue can’t be wearing white, so that leaves us with the red shirt, so mr blue is wearing red. For mr white, it can’t be the white or red shirt because mr blue is already taken by the red shirt. So mr white is wearing blue and mr red is wearing white.
Wait... the last riddle by me: the second one can not be it, because it says it. The first one could be it, but the third one says it isn't in it. But noone said anything about third one. That means it is in the third one! If you tell me it is not then I am done with my brain
abdul ahad I'm glad that i am not alone :)
The second box has the car and the third statement is true. I’ll tell you why. The argument states that only one of the three statements can be true.
If statement 1 is true:
If statement 1 is true then the other two statements must be false. Only when statement 1 is true, only statement 3 is false. It’s true that if the car is in box one that the car cannot be in box 2 so statement 2 is true. That means the car is not in box 1.
If statement 2 is true:
If statement 2 is true then the other two statements must be false. Only when statement 2 is true, statement 3 is also true. If the car is in box 2 then it is not in box 1. That means that statement 2 must be false. The car must be in box 2.
If statement 3 is true:
If statement 3 is true then the other two statements must be false. This is the only case in which this term holds true. If it is true that there isn’t a car in box 1, then statement one is false. The car must be in box 2 making statement two false. That means that only statement 3 is true and that the car must be in box 2!
London Withers I got lost but thanks for making time to explain me how the right answer is! :)
Jan Endrych hahahah finally that knows the Good answer.
iluvperkushun what
YES
Great. Thank you for sharing!
Food For Healthy
There's no stipulation that the denizens of the town don't have paperwork to enter their own town, or that the guard waits for them to get there when he sees them coming instead of merely checking to see what's going on.
#1 he’s trying to leave so obviously he’s not bringing paperwork to get in. #2 if the guard didn’t wait for them to get there then the merchant could’ve just turned and ran after the sharpshooter left his post.
I solved 1 riddle
Me too
How?
GoldenFox 09 me too i solved the toy car in the box because i saw it before which one did you get
GoldenFox 09 me too
‼️HEY GUYS PLEASE HELP ME GET TO 1000 SUBS WITH NO VIDEOS BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE AWESOME SO PLEASE DO IT‼️
In the first riddle, why is it impossible for Mr. Blue to be wearing the white shirt? The solution given is that
Mr. Blue -> Red shirt
Mr. White -> Blue shirt
Mr. Red -> White shirt
But wouldn’t
Mr. Blue -> White shirt
Mr. White -> Red shirt
Mr. Red -> Blue shirt
also meet the conditions? I’m sure I’m missing something but this is really tripping me up lol.
Because the guy in the white shirt is speaking to mr. blue, and it wouldn’t make much sense if he was just talking to himself
bob thornton ah thank you!!
White isn't a colour
Bertram0804 yes it is. For example, what if you had a black chalkboard and you used a white chalk? Isn't it the same as using a blue chalk? If you could use a chalk that's blue, which is a color, than using a white chalk means that they're the same and they are both colors.
Actually, white and black are not colors. They are both an absence of color. The only difference is that one reflects the light, while the other repels it.
Purplepuppyunicorncataphmau 101 You realise there are two versions of “color” right? the american one and the british same as airplane and aeroplane
Purplepuppyunicorncataphmau 101 it can be spelt that way too
It's a neutral color duh
for #2 i get they are rational but we all are sometimes dumb... im sure a few wouldn't think and eat it.
Didn't spend more than 2 sec on each one of them resulting in skipping lots of the video ;o
Aren't you clever.
Got them all right!:)
No one cares
3rd box has car in it.
This is a poorly made riddle. If only one is true, it can be in either the first or the third box
you are right....3rd box has the car in it
I thought it's three because only one rule applies to each box
Explanation:
Only one sentence is correct. Other two are lies. The 1st box can't have a car inside, because that would mean that the second one is a lie.
The 2nd box sentence can't be true, because that would be a nonsence (try it). The 3rd sentence is true because:
1: not in this one(it's false)
2: in this one (false)
3: not in the first one(true).(this is thr only one that can be correct, others are false)
Answer: the car is in box number 2.
Evan Vassil Wrong. If the first is true, then the second has to be true. If the second was true, the first and third can not be both wrong. If the first doesn't have it, as a lie, it would make the third sentence true. If the third sentence lied, the first would be true. So in the process of elimination the third is true. But that doesn't mean the car is in that box. If it is true, it is not in the first box. So the 2nd is lying just like the first. In conclusion, the answer is actually the second box.
#3 i was thinking about the trick were you steal a item by secretly picking it off the shelf then try to return it but since you don’t have the receipt they say you cant and then you leave with it.
Thumbnail is neither because theyre all on the outside
Kay Boo its just a picture on a box
The first one could also be Mr. White = Red Shirt, Mr. Blue = White Shirt, Mr. Red = Blue Shirt
The man will go in 5 mom and act like he is coming
While watching this video, I remember my symbolic logic class during college days.
Can anyone explain how did they solve the true colours logic
They didn’t. You can still have:
Mr. Red - white
Mr. White - blue
Mr. Blue - red
1. Easy, you just need to use a table.
2. Also easy, because the lions will know the consequences. Only 9 lions and 2 sheep.
3. Oh…
4. This was hard.
5. Easy.
I would argue that Damian could be the murderer because he could have had his leg amputated from an accident he was in after drinking heavily and it's unfair to say an amputee can't run a marathon and the innocent person could have been his brother there for support.
The best riddles i have ever encountered on RUclips..kudos to you bright side. ✌👍🙂
The last one can also be 3 because box 1 says in this one. Box 2 says NOT in this one. But box 3 says not in the 1st one... so it can be in box 3 aswell. That was my answer, what do u guys think
#3 No one said the king is dumb- because the sharpshooter doesn't see the merchant entering the bridge so he assume the merchant was trying to escape and shoots him.
#4 As soon as they said the murderer had his leg amputated I stopped paying attention. It's obviously the one with a missing leg.
It’s asking what’s his name.
That's funny 😆
Second riddle: the first lion who eats a sheep gets a sheep in his tummy, and protected by the fact of other lions not eating him for the fear they could turn them into sheeps aswell makes him safe, but there could lay the possibility that every lion thought so, keeping them eating sheep and getting turned into one, until the last lion who was sure that there could be no lion to eat him. So, 1 sheep left at the end, 0 lions
your whole train of thought assumes that the rational and intelligent lions would think that they’re safer as a sheep than as a lion.
and even if your thought process was correct, there would be 1 sheep and 1 lion, because why would the last lion become a sheep for protection if there’s no other lions.
You are making the same thing often, but you just change the names.But I like them.
Umm... #4 a person with an amputated leg can still run a marathon it's call a prosthetic leg
yea if only he didn’t get amputated a month ago
2:00 idk why but this is so satisfying
I got 3/5, but I honestly think #2 shouldnt count. If they are logical and rational why do they need to be watched to begin with? Even if they do, theyre rational, so they wouldnt eat the sheep because the watcher would get in trouble. They are many explanations for this one. Dont mix magic with logic...
The true colours puzzle is even easier then you think... The middle guy gives a hint: mr. blue you're right, which you can also read as that mr. blue is on the right side from the guy in the middle, and since the middle guy cant be white he must be red.. so from left to right you got blue, red, white..
Also on puzzle #4 you have made a mistake.. you did figure out the answer, as it only asks you to identify the murderer. But the way you did it was wrong. In the end you say you got Michael and Jeffrey left. That Jeffrey is alive is correct. BUT CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG, MICHAEL CAN BE ALIVE ASWELL, AND THE KILLED PERSON COULD BE ONE OF THE 2 MARATHON RUNNERS!
you can't figure out who the person was that got killed. But you can figure out that the killer wasn't Michael, cause he didnt grew up in a city, but on a farm before he moved to a city, while the 2 brothers spent their youth together in Chicago.
and #5 was also easy that it could only be box #2
I didnt found the solution myself on 2 and 3.. just on 1, 4 and 5
The sheep and lion conclusion is in correct.
The only answer is no lions and one sheep.
You posed that the lions are logical. Therefore being that there is no other food source
available to the lions, in this puzzle, then they will either all die from starvation or they will eat the sheep. Either way you end up with no lions and one sheep.
Unless, of course, they all eat the sheep together, turn into sheep themselves and graze on the grass.
These vids are so awesome!!! Lol I love the challenge.
#3 The guard knew that the King would not want anyone in the town who ran that way.
My Argument for your second one - Since all animals are rational, and the Lion their King, NO LION WOULD EAT THE SHEEP IN THE FIRST PLACE, as THEY ALREADY KNOW THAT IS GOING TO TURN THEM TO SHEEP.
The first question has two answers and here’s how.
White shirt is Mr.Blue
Blue shirt is Mr.Red
Red shirt is Mr.White
Explain why I’m wrong pls.