Most of these videos promise much with their shocking headlines but, very few actually deliver. This one makes a genuine attempt to explain things in a rational and logical way, without resorting to regurgitating endless, random facts that explain nothing. One of the better ones I've seen..
Was hoping for Cliff notes on this one because I think about this concept ask the time. I knew this video wasn't going to answer anything. Only makes my faith in a huge being stronger.
I agree. This video, although doesn’t present a lot of new information… it presents it with new creative ways of taking us through it. Cosmology, Theoretic physics and quantum theory are my jam. But the last few years has lacked as far as videos in this format. Given we have been idling for some time with searching for a unified theory, it’s not surprising. But technology moves exponentially quickly, and the webb instrument has shaken things up. I thought this was going to be a snoozer but definitely kept my attention. Well done.
I like how this video is presented. For example the universe is expanding which if you are into this topic you already know . Everything is spreading apart which I always knew and understood but I also knew that the Milky Way and Andromeda are on their way to colliding which I didn’t understand how and this is the first video that explained that gravity even being the weakest force is stronger than the expansion of the universe which kind of makes sense to me because if I am correct in understanding that nothing can move faster than the speed of light because anything with mass cannot move at the speed of light and the universe itself can expand faster than the speed of light because the universe in itself has no mass. I 41:47 know I am greatly over simplifying this topic and I am very bad at communicating my thoughts through writing but does anyone kind of understand the connection I am trying to make between the expansion of the universe being faster than the speed of light and and gravity being strong enough to cancel out that expansion in the case of our galaxy and Andromeda coming together? Again I’m sorry I cannot express my thoughts as clearly as most people can but if anyone kind of comprehends my thought process about this and understands the mechanics of the expanding universe , the power of gravity being able to overcome the expansion and the speed of light being unobtainable by anything with mass I would appreciate being corrected in my way of thinking.
Don't think of it as an "object that is expanding." Think of the universe instead as just the collection of all the things in it. Each pair of things has a relationship with each other that we have named "distance." That's all this is - a relationship. Say your universe had three objects in it. You just have three numbers: distance(a,b), distance(b,c), and distance(c,a). If you had four objects, you'd have six numbers - the pairs would now be (a, b), (a, c), (a, d), (b, c), (b, d), and (c, d). Now - just imagine that all of those numbers are increasing in a proportional way as time passes. That is the expansion of that universe. That's all there is to it. There is no geometric object of the sort we picture or imagine. That geometric layout is simply how our senses DISPLAY these relationships to us. So, in a very real sense there will always be just as much space as is needed to capture the distances that exist at any given time. The empty space between our objects, and beyond our objects, simply does not exist. It's a construct of our senses.
@@Radrook353 I'm not aware of any doubt being cast on the idea that space is expanding, but I do think I heard that the relatively recent belief that the rate of expansion is accelerating has had at least some observations question it. That accelerating expansion idea was based on particular assumptions, and evidence has appeared indicating the POSSIBILITY that those assumptions were not entirely correct. But I don't think this negates the idea of the expansion itself - just the fact that it's speeding up.
This is the very question that made me start learning about space as an adult a few years ago. It’s the best question I ever asked myself because it sparked a passion that lead me to learning so much. I hope I never get a clear answer because searching for it has turned into a life long love of mine.
If the Universe expanded from everywhere, at every point, then the real question is where was the Universe compared to its relationship to nothing, which is what’s on the other side of the Universe. Obviously, we are missing pieces to the puzzle. We need data that we might never have.
We might have all the pieces.... just not in our lifetimes. Or any lifetime near us. But never say never, in the next 15 billion years. We've only been this voyage for roughly 15,000 years. 15 billion years is a very, very long time.
that would be another layer of the universe, champ. don't try so hard to avoid the truth; there is no fathomable answer. none. existence contained? IN WHAT? THEN WHAT?
@@jimzellman8031If the universe was tiny at its birth it had to be tiny in relationship to something. It had to explode in reaction to something. If it started to expand and filled up with millions of galaxies it had to displace something.
@@Best..YT..Music..PlaylistsMaybe we’re not smart enough to know…yet, or ever. The same as apes can’t ever have the information we can, we need another couple of evolutions or more centuries of progress to understand.
I asked ChatGPT for an answer, one answer it gave to the question 'What is outside of our universe?' was 'inflationary space'. It described a turbulent boundary where the normal space of our universe transitions into inflationary space. Assuming you could break the laws of physics and go, there you wouldn't want to unless you wish to return without your sanity.
Why? So far, we have no evidence nor an explanation. In fact, if that is true and time space started at some point, we have no way to investigate what happened before the plank time
@mmcgee9 Are you shure? I thought it was the nothing that is expanding. Even your "flows" looks a bit dicey to me. Isn't it the claim of all the quantum folks exactly the opposite, that it doesn't flow, it jumps?
Great title. The universe is simply limited, although keeping growing. There is something bigger than the universe to allow for the continuous universe growth in it
@@bearthepug888 that's right.. don't you think it has to be infinite because there is always something on the other side even if it's nothing nothing is still something
At the speed of light (approximately 186,282 miles per second) in atmospheric conditions, Domino's Pizza only delivers in atmosphere on Earth, the consequences would be catastrophic! At such high speeds, you would experience immense air resistance, generating an enormous amount of heat due to friction. No discovered material has yet to be discovered to handle this type of friction. At these speeds any object would heat up extremely quickly, leading to vaporization and disintegration. You would burst into flames and we can estimate that it would happen almost instantaneously, likely on the order of nanoseconds or even faster! So is the pizza free? Yes but you will never collect.
@@rattratt12 so yur sayin i should expect my pie to be a tad burnt and a bit crispy....i'm good with that. i just hope that Bode's Galaxy is in a delivery zone!
Cepheids are stars in their giant phase, their outer layers expanding and contracting. Pulsars are neutron stars, long dead, the beams of radiation caused by their magnetic fields sweeping around and around as they spin super fast, making them pulse.
I think this is silly in two ways but first I understand why we need to stay on top of technology as not to allow the enemies to have unfair advantages. 1. Besides the point I mentioned above, who cares about galaxy and stars? We need to focus on paradise Earth. Looking up into heaven is not going to solve our problems. 2. Let suppose you have a projector, do you see those dust swirling in front of the light? Who is to say that all that it was? We trying to make sense of what might just be some one walking by and disturb the dust (temporary). But because we don't live that long to see, it is kinda pointless.
You're also thinking in the terms of 2 axis movement and not 3 axis. We could both be moving away from the center of the source of energy, but Andromeda is next to us and moving forward and right, while us maybe just forward, or forward and left.
As expected the comment section is full of idiots and science deniers. The end of this world cant come soon enough. This video was fantastic. Great work on it!
Idiots indeed. Who would have thought that all the information in the history of the world at your fingertips would have made everyone dumber. It boggles the mind.
@@sethprice241It's a bit depressing. And people aren't just getting a little bit more dumb, either. On average, people seem to be more stupid now than at any other time in human history. Go us.
@@sethprice241...also, who would have thought that everyone writing on word processors that can autocorrect spelling and grammar at the speed of light would make everyone illiterate, and so unable to communicate with each other effectively. I have absolutely no idea what many people are even _trying_ to say these days. I said this to someone in a comment a little while back, and they responded with the typical "Spelling Nazi!" insult, so I just politely asked them "Why bother writing anything at all if nobody has a clue what it is you're saying? I realise that spelling correctly is out of fashion, but don't you want to be understood?". They didn't reply, though... like I said, it's depressing.
probably a bunch of bots, given a lot of the name and the text attached to it. they are here to make you think that, or other things - best to ignore them, and no, its not bad to assume some moron is a bot when they aren't, but still, most of these comments are just that.
It is wild to think about humans reversing the expansion of the universe with some kind of technology, that would almost in a way make us like G0d Imagine the negative consequences that could have. Space is the most amazing subject to learn about but also frustrating because we can never really know fully each detail as we want to and all the crazy relationships in the universe.
If you're looking for a constant, you will never find it. The expansgenerators always changing affected by gravity and where they are in the universe. How far apart they are is always changing as stars are born. And black holes are creative.Everything's constantly changing so you will never find a constant
I've always been very unsatisfied with the explanation that the universe is expanding... So astronomers say that they can tell things are spreading out, they can observe the redshift, right... I get all that. That makes sense. What doesn't make sense is how they extrapolate this to conclude that the _entire_ universe is expanding. How do they know this isn't something that's only happening locally? Why wouldn't they just conclude that the _observable_ universe is expanding? Maybe there's a good answer I just haven't heard, but the conclusion that the _entire_ universe expanding seems like a bit of a leap if the explanation is just that they can see everything spreading out... does not seem very scientific to conclude that without more evidence.
The observable universe and the known universe are one and the same. We don't know what we can't see. So they are reporting on what we know to be true. Anything beyond what we can see is simply speculation. When they say, the universe is expanding, they mean everything that we know of, is expanding. 'Locally' doesn't exist in the context of everything.
I've always had the same thought. This could be just a small section of the universe that is expanding from a single point, but that doesn't exclude that there Is more universe. It's like star formation but for our observable universe. There could be endless amounts of other big bangs within our universe The same way when a star is created there are other stars beyond it.
Thanks for the vid. This universe , if we look at hawkins map of it , has the path behind our local grouping folding and rolling like three forms reclining , ahead a big hole and the left of our grouping super tension emissions , the base of the map a core of dense stars. It looks to me like the bubble we were in collided with a smaller denser univers mass and that this caused the globular breakdown to our local grouping. The vareous effects in the hawkins map show this quite well , as if we could take the energy verse , and spectrum emission it to evolve local groupings of universes. In our case a smaller denser one has collided , these groupings of univeres , i mean univereses too , are where we would look upon our spectrum of light in an analasys and see a chemical base , like alcohol in a position further from core output , to where another type of chem an acid would be and so on. Except in an energy verse situation these chemistrys become universe Our local grouping has then collided and the map hawkins made shows this collision core while we fold burst and show the tensions upon what would have been our own universal formation. Globular breakdowns in process and so on. Crazy stuff realy
I read something recently that they sort of debunked dark energy. The reason the expansion of the universe is accelerating is because of the way massive objects and their gravity warp space-time. When you're near massive objects time moves more slowly. So the massive empty space between galaxies and particularly between Galaxy clusters isn't really expanding faster it's just that more time has elapsed in those empty spaces. Billions of years more time in fact. As the space between massive objects experiences more and more time the distance of that empty space from objects with mass increases causing them to experience time faster still. Hence the appearance of acceleration.
As there is nothing that anything can travel through faster than light, and the universe is expanding faster than light. It can only be one thing. That is to say - NOTHING!
it iis a fractal. All the maths adds up it is a fractal. When the galaxies gat far enough apart, they provide the space to allow a new galaxy to be born. Like drops on a pond.
Excellent production. Well organized script. Easy to understand. Nice background music. This humbles me as a human being. One day, there would be nothing. Perhaps we are lucky to be here. To have lived ❤❤❤❤.
Im finding it difficult to understand is light speed is a constant and can not be broken except expansion. Can any one explain please?. I thought that the galaxies were moving away at a high % of the speed of light and galaxys were being pushed apart by dark energy and both worked together as breaking the speed of light
7:30 If it breaks the laws of physics then it needs to be rethought. Magically expanding to a fantastic size then slowing in expansion to match physics must be wrong. The cumulative effect of evenly distributed expansion measured over great distances will cause an illusion that there is an edge to the universe. It is an illusion that objects 13.8 billion light years away are travelling faster than light.
All I know is that all I know now is probably wrong. Who knows what we will learn in the next 15 billion years? Probably that nothing we know now is right. Just as all we knew 15,000 years ago was quite right. There's no land of infinite reeds where gods reside and judge our souls against a feather. No giants forming mountains, no leviathans eating ships, no sky birds consuming the sun.
Everyone talks about space expanding but no one considers that time may be passing at different rates at different distances in space. If time passes at different rates at different distances from gravitational masses and at different rates for moving bodies then why can't time pass, or appear to pass, at different rates at massive distances away from the observer?
Gravity draws them towards each other. We are presently colliding with the Sagittarius dwarf Galaxy and scheduled to collide with the Andromeda galaxy billions of years from now.
@Radrook353 but the episode went into detail about the universe expanding, why are galaxies colliding if science says they expanding in an omnidirectional "Big Bang" blast? Some Galaxies are moving forward & backward & side to side! & Some Galaxies are older than the Big Bang. JWST has really messed up this theory.
@@LocomotiveThought The ones that collide are gravitationally bound into clusters and super clusters and are not locally affected by the universal expansion in their relation to one another. For example, in our local group of galaxies, Andromeda and the Milky way are approaching each other and are scheduled to merge in the far future. Meanwhile, the voids between our super cluster and others are expanding.
@@Radrook353 Forgive my skepticism but this sounds like optimistic conjecture & speculation or perhaps Religion. Personally, I believe the universe goes on forever & if it doesn't, something else lies beyond. Fire, ice, concrete, who knows. If multiple Universes exist, then they exist in one plane of existence. My point is we have no shortage of questions & eventually it turns into religion. People say we have pictures of black holes & my response to that is, "We have pictures of Bigfoot too." It took countless Æons for you to be here, make good choices & enjoy yourself. Thank you for the conversation.
Let's say that the matter of the universe is finite, and that is all the matter there is. Then it is expanding into nothingness, which is infinity. (it also changes within the changelessness that is eternity).
@Radrook353 if its just the distances between everything "expanding" there would be no way to tell if "everything" was getting smaller and the distances just staying the same.
I guess that would depend on your frame of reference. Or perhaps the redshift has more to do with the time the light has traveled and not distance. I'm not saying that we are shrinking. I'm just pointing out we don't have a ruler big enough. From the point of view of the expanding space is the light even red shifted? Does the light experience redshift or are we the only ones who notice it? I don't know but these seem like questions that should be asked before forming an opinion
Well 99.9999% of every atom is empty space, so you're proposing that the fundamental forces that hold the structuce of atoms are changing in a way that reduces the empty void uniformly over time. Maybe darkmatter is consuming the energy of matter? A fun idea 🎉
@mightT1 Space is certainly a topic for discussion here; I don't think you know anything about your "everything," an utterly different subject. So you're just another infantile shitposter with nonstandard capitalization on your silly little squib. Consider yourself a posterchild for "Why the Chinese are laughing at Trump's America." And a candidate for the most pompous anonym in the joint.
how do you know theres nothing passed the observable? what if no matter how fast you can go 2x 10x100x the speed of light, you still find what you see from home ? why is that not fact but your way is? like what ifi get out to 90 billion light years out and i take the JWST and look out 90billion more light years and i see the same thing? and if you can traverse through a instant portal then you can see what you say we can never see do to the speed of expansion? sorry if this is grade school
They are not claiming that there is nothing existing past what we can observe. In fact, they are saying that what cannot be observed is like the Earth in size in comparison to an atom to what we can observe
All universes are held together by geometries. They DON'T expand, although it seems that way. Nobody has ever mentioned the geometry of space when trying to explain universes. It is a combination of a big bang AND Steady State that make this universe possible. The only thing off of the top of my head that I can think of that people talk about that is correct, is the way that this universe will end. Black holes. :)
I have not watched this video and neither do I wish to. If you can imagine the size of the universe then go beyond and imagine a universe that is outside inside infamous
We'll just have to hang and I few billion years we still won't know. Seriously there is no outside the universe , it exists in time with neither beginning nor end.
We will never have a definitive answer to the mystery of universe.. but one thing is for sure… reality is something totally beyond our intellectual capability… my own theory is if universe is expanding then there must be something on the other side that is pulling our universe towards it.. space time fabric cannot go on forever on its own… something is calling itself towards it..
Cosmic acceleration is empirical. Big bang cosmology is well-substantiated. What we understand as the fundamental forces in nature played no role in the universe's initial point of inflation.
@@ominous-omnipresent-they I made this assumption on the basis of my experience so far.. everything that we see around us has a start and an end as well.. this cycle of birth and death makes me believe that every element of universe including the universe itself is part of the same process.. Going by this logic Universe must have been born (big bang or perhaps something else) so its natural at some point in time it will end too..
@ Perhaps but inflation (if real) happened in plank-time. Some force that we are unaware of triggered cosmic inflation. Was it God? Could it have something to do with dark matter and dark energy? It acted as if some sort of faster than light explosion occurred. What I know is that the James Webb telescope just threw a monkey wrench in our understanding of the Universes formation. Now we have to question the age of the universe. The theory of multiverses might have something to do with so many red-shifted galaxies developing at a time we thought nothing should have developed. It’s time we go back and recalculate our mathematical models to try and understand the new data. James Webb will work its magic and begin to ask new questions we haven’t thought of yet. James Webb will ask questions that only newer, more advanced technology can tackle. Never says that we have answered all there is to answer, because our modeling is based upon the data we currently have. And, that data is just scratching the surface. We are just beginning to ask new questions that one day will further our understanding of where we came from and how we got here. Thanks for your comment!
@09:45 Super high atm and my brain has come up with a theory, would this not be similar to say a a strong elastic band where if you slowly add heavier weights to the band the stretchier it gets but also the faster it stretches and expands while the elastic band is getting weaker ready to snap, sooooo if the universe expanding is speeding up it could just mean we are soon going to…lost my train of thought
Episode 3 primer fields. Watch this and everything will become clear. The.universe as we know it is in a primer fields...inside the containment zone...hence-forth " expansion".
1. Beretta 92x with laser red dot and hi res sights and threaded barrel 9 mm 2. Beretta cx4 storm with AR stock conversion, flat top, hi viz secondary sights, 3 moa mil grade red dot, cut down barrel shroud to accommodate threading for a dedicated 9 mm suppressor 3. Henry Long Ranger Supreme in 300 bo with a dedicated 30 cal suppressor like Silencerco Hybrid (takes AR mags) with leupold scope 4. Mossberg 500 tactical in 410 with hi viz ironsights only 5. Tikka T3x with custom Boyd stock in 6.5 CR with threaded barrel ready for Silencerco Hybrid plus ATN 4kpro scope 6. Beretta 12 ga / 20 ga OU for turkey and clays 7. Chiappa Wildcat Alaskan in 44 mag lever action takedown comes ready threaded-need to change the front sight to a high sitting high viz sight Those are my top 7 that i use and shoot most. If the person has kids, I would suggest swapping 5 for a Henry 22 lr lever action. If the person hunts in restrictive states, then replace 7 with a Ruger No 1 in 450 bushmaster. Regardless of firearms, i would make a BIG case for all gun owners to start using suppressors whenever possible.
Because we are in a group of galaxies called our local group and the forces of gravity still affect these local groups of galaxies to interact with one another ,as we are still expanding away from other groups . if you think about it it’s like a little bubbles ,in our local group is one bubble with the gravity still attracting one another to each other ,that’s how you have galaxies that merge like our own has done before and will do again. I’m sure there’s somebody that can explain it better than me, but that’s the best I can do. Hope that gives you the general idea.
Andromeda is part of our local galactic cluster. It’s close enough that gravity is pulling Andromeda and the Milky Way closer to each other at a faster rate than the expansion of space over the same distance. Thus, the Milky Way and Andromeda are on a collision course.
The concept of an infinite universe that is constantly expanding which means that every possible scenario can exist and will exist. Like a version of me that lives my exact life in every single way exists somewhere in the universe, or that other version of me is living life with slight changes, or massive changes. Maybe I am a billionaire and have cured cancer and am a queen of the whole planet. But I digress… The point is that the universe is so inconceivably vast that the human mind is incapable of comprehending it in a meaningful way. Just the concept of infinite is hard to grasp. I hope humanity can develop technology that allows us to travel across the expanse of space and become an intergalactic society and possibly discover intelligent life on a distant world, but not eradicate it like we tend to do
Think of the universe as a immense recycling apple shape conveyor belt that loops back on it self, in this conveyor belt matter is pushed out from the sub-atomic (the big bang), where time and matter were or are concentrated in a singular point, since this moment the universe has been expanding into a vacuum (the force they call dark matter), over billions of years because of the expansion of the universe the force that keeps matter together would break down and matter would be broken down back into the subatomic particles, this particular would accumulate/concentrate again at the subatomic level to the point where the vacuum is empty again, where the difference in pressure would start another big bang. There should be a small, almost immeasurable curvature, but as the universe ages this curvature would be more noticeable as the laws of physics reach the breaking point.
what if the universe isnt always expanding, but rather in a countless unpredictable cycle of expanding a little, contracting a little, sometimes staying the same, etc. like the ocean, how certain parts swell and others dip down, but its always changing. imagine that but on a cosmic scale.
Finally what is it expanding into and what is that called and how many those are there and the next thing and the next, time doesn't exist and there is no beginning r end to the universe it just keeps expanding and changing let their be light is possible are probably something that is still going on instead of a one event thing.
Most of these videos promise much with their shocking headlines but, very few actually deliver. This one makes a genuine attempt to explain things in a rational and logical way, without resorting to regurgitating endless, random facts that explain nothing. One of the better ones I've seen..
Was hoping for Cliff notes on this one because I think about this concept ask the time. I knew this video wasn't going to answer anything. Only makes my faith in a huge being stronger.
I agree. This video, although doesn’t present a lot of new information… it presents it with new creative ways of taking us through it. Cosmology, Theoretic physics and quantum theory are my jam. But the last few years has lacked as far as videos in this format. Given we have been idling for some time with searching for a unified theory, it’s not surprising. But technology moves exponentially quickly, and the webb instrument has shaken things up. I thought this was going to be a snoozer but definitely kept my attention. Well done.
History of the Universe is awesome too. As well as Astrum, Cool Worlds, John Michael Godier, V101, SEA, and ParallaxNick
This is just chatgpt explaining questions with some pictures of the universe in the background
@@nice6484 Why haven't you taken the time to assemble your own video that explains the subject matter better then?
I like how this video is presented. For example the universe is expanding which if you are into this topic you already know . Everything is spreading apart which I always knew and understood but I also knew that the Milky Way and Andromeda are on their way to colliding which I didn’t understand how and this is the first video that explained that gravity even being the weakest force is stronger than the expansion of the universe which kind of makes sense to me because if I am correct in understanding that nothing can move faster than the speed of light because anything with mass cannot move at the speed of light and the universe itself can expand faster than the speed of light because the universe in itself has no mass. I 41:47 know I am greatly over simplifying this topic and I am very bad at communicating my thoughts through writing but does anyone kind of understand the connection I am trying to make between the expansion of the universe being faster than the speed of light and and gravity being strong enough to cancel out that expansion in the case of our galaxy and Andromeda coming together? Again I’m sorry I cannot express my thoughts as clearly as most people can but if anyone kind of comprehends my thought process about this and understands the mechanics of the expanding universe , the power of gravity being able to overcome the expansion and the speed of light being unobtainable by anything with mass I would appreciate being corrected in my way of thinking.
The vast majority of stars that we see in the sky without a telescope belong to our Milky way. So our naked-eye view will remain unaffected.
I found the narrative and visuals very relaxing and well our together
It wasn’t a relaxing show it was try and make your mind work, but obviously it doesn’t
Don't think of it as an "object that is expanding." Think of the universe instead as just the collection of all the things in it. Each pair of things has a relationship with each other that we have named "distance." That's all this is - a relationship. Say your universe had three objects in it. You just have three numbers: distance(a,b), distance(b,c), and distance(c,a). If you had four objects, you'd have six numbers - the pairs would now be (a, b), (a, c), (a, d), (b, c), (b, d), and (c, d).
Now - just imagine that all of those numbers are increasing in a proportional way as time passes. That is the expansion of that universe. That's all there is to it. There is no geometric object of the sort we picture or imagine. That geometric layout is simply how our senses DISPLAY these relationships to us. So, in a very real sense there will always be just as much space as is needed to capture the distances that exist at any given time. The empty space between our objects, and beyond our objects, simply does not exist. It's a construct of our senses.
Isn't the James Web telescope casting certain doubts on these ideas?
@@Radrook353 I'm not aware of any doubt being cast on the idea that space is expanding, but I do think I heard that the relatively recent belief that the rate of expansion is accelerating has had at least some observations question it. That accelerating expansion idea was based on particular assumptions, and evidence has appeared indicating the POSSIBILITY that those assumptions were not entirely correct.
But I don't think this negates the idea of the expansion itself - just the fact that it's speeding up.
It's the observable universe, some other parts which we can't see might be "shrinking" or whatever.
This is the very question that made me start learning about space as an adult a few years ago. It’s the best question I ever asked myself because it sparked a passion that lead me to learning so much. I hope I never get a clear answer because searching for it has turned into a life long love of mine.
@@dangallant4704 haha that's funny. It can lead to a lot of research
If the Universe expanded from everywhere, at every point, then the real question is where was the Universe compared to its relationship to nothing, which is what’s on the other side of the Universe. Obviously, we are missing pieces to the puzzle. We need data that we might never have.
We might have all the pieces.... just not in our lifetimes. Or any lifetime near us. But never say never, in the next 15 billion years.
We've only been this voyage for roughly 15,000 years. 15 billion years is a very, very long time.
that would be another layer of the universe, champ. don't try so hard to avoid the truth; there is no fathomable answer. none. existence contained? IN WHAT? THEN WHAT?
The universe was everywhere. There was no place that wasn't the universe. That's my view.
@@jimzellman8031If the universe was tiny at its birth it had to be tiny in relationship to something. It had to explode in reaction to something. If it started to expand and filled up with millions of galaxies it had to displace something.
@@Best..YT..Music..PlaylistsMaybe we’re not smart enough to know…yet, or ever. The same as apes can’t ever have the information we can, we need another couple of evolutions or more centuries of progress to understand.
Time is merely a perception of events.
The universe is letting it’s belt out
What a beautiful video and you explain this really well. Thank you.
It's all your fault witch
I asked ChatGPT for an answer, one answer it gave to the question 'What is outside of our universe?' was 'inflationary space'. It described a turbulent boundary where the normal space of our universe transitions into inflationary space.
Assuming you could break the laws of physics and go, there you wouldn't want to unless you wish to return without your sanity.
It expands into itself. That's one of the best parts of infinity: There's always more of it.
If the models don’t agree, there is a mystery that Agatha Christie said is really less a mystery than a muddle.
The beginning of the universe could have only begun if there was something before the beginning of the universe
Why? So far, we have no evidence nor an explanation. In fact, if that is true and time space started at some point, we have no way to investigate what happened before the plank time
Yes, and it is God
@@pristika9007something doesn’t come from nothing despite what modern physics, aka quantum mechanics says
@@brasidas33 logically simplicity forms into complexity.
@IsaacShorter-l5i wrong
Extremely enjoyed the wealth of info in this presentation.
Don't watch this video when you're high!!!
When would I be high?
@@SkyRunner21 the only time I watch this shit is when I'm just baked
To answer your title questions, it's strip malls.
The universe is expanding into more and more strip malls.
Everything flows, nothing stays
@mmcgee9
Are you shure? I thought it was the nothing that is expanding.
Even your "flows" looks a bit dicey to me. Isn't it the claim of all the quantum folks exactly the opposite, that it doesn't flow, it jumps?
Great title. The universe is simply limited, although keeping growing. There is something bigger than the universe to allow for the continuous universe growth in it
In fact the Universe is extremely tiny, when viewed from outside.
@@bearthepug888 that's right.. don't you think it has to be infinite because there is always something on the other side even if it's nothing nothing is still something
@ idk if it’s infinite. But what I think is something bigger than the universe is out there
If the fabric of space is stretched so would be the distance from earth to sun ?
It is
is the pizza still free if Dominos can't get there in 30 minutes....even if the person who called is moving away at nearly the speed of light?
A math equation for the ages!
Doesn’t your question imply that Dominoes also moves at the speed of light? There’s something wrong with the theory, I suspect.
At the speed of light (approximately 186,282 miles per second) in atmospheric conditions, Domino's Pizza only delivers in atmosphere on Earth, the consequences would be catastrophic!
At such high speeds, you would experience immense air resistance, generating an enormous amount of heat due to friction. No discovered material has yet to be discovered to handle this type of friction. At these speeds any object would heat up extremely quickly, leading to vaporization and disintegration.
You would burst into flames and we can estimate that it would happen almost instantaneously, likely on the order of nanoseconds or even faster!
So is the pizza free? Yes but you will never collect.
@@rattratt12 so yur sayin i should expect my pie to be a tad burnt and a bit crispy....i'm good with that. i just hope that Bode's Galaxy is in a delivery zone!
😂😂😂😂😂
What's the difference between a.. cephite? And a pulsar?
Cepheids are stars in their giant phase, their outer layers expanding and contracting.
Pulsars are neutron stars, long dead, the beams of radiation caused by their magnetic fields sweeping around and around as they spin super fast, making them pulse.
More universe is there.
? If we expand in a vacuum is it possible there’s a change in the vacuum
I think this is silly in two ways but first I understand why we need to stay on top of technology as not to allow the enemies to have unfair advantages.
1. Besides the point I mentioned above, who cares about galaxy and stars? We need to focus on paradise Earth. Looking up into heaven is not going to solve our problems.
2. Let suppose you have a projector, do you see those dust swirling in front of the light? Who is to say that all that it was? We trying to make sense of what might just be some one walking by and disturb the dust (temporary). But because we don't live that long to see, it is kinda pointless.
If galaxies are all moving away from each other, how come Andromeda is flying towards us?
Gravity is stronger than dark energy there
You're also thinking in the terms of 2 axis movement and not 3 axis. We could both be moving away from the center of the source of energy, but Andromeda is next to us and moving forward and right, while us maybe just forward, or forward and left.
@ thanks fellow 😅
If space is expanding, then energy is increasing.
Excellent.
Is nothingness any less a miracle than substance?
Though provoking comment.
This is what I've been thinking recently. The only thing more inconceivable than existence is a complete lack of existence.
Spock could figure it out.
Fantastic video thank you
As expected the comment section is full of idiots and science deniers. The end of this world cant come soon enough.
This video was fantastic. Great work on it!
Idiots indeed. Who would have thought that all the information in the history of the world at your fingertips would have made everyone dumber. It boggles the mind.
@@sethprice241It's a bit depressing. And people aren't just getting a little bit more dumb, either. On average, people seem to be more stupid now than at any other time in human history. Go us.
@@sethprice241...also, who would have thought that everyone writing on word processors that can autocorrect spelling and grammar at the speed of light would make everyone illiterate, and so unable to communicate with each other effectively. I have absolutely no idea what many people are even _trying_ to say these days. I said this to someone in a comment a little while back, and they responded with the typical "Spelling Nazi!" insult, so I just politely asked them "Why bother writing anything at all if nobody has a clue what it is you're saying? I realise that spelling correctly is out of fashion, but don't you want to be understood?". They didn't reply, though... like I said, it's depressing.
probably a bunch of bots, given a lot of the name and the text attached to it. they are here to make you think that, or other things - best to ignore them, and no, its not bad to assume some moron is a bot when they aren't, but still, most of these comments are just that.
It is wild to think about humans reversing the expansion of the universe with some kind of technology, that would almost in a way make us like G0d Imagine the negative consequences that could have. Space is the most amazing subject to learn about but also frustrating because we can never really know fully each detail as we want to and all the crazy relationships in the universe.
If you're looking for a constant, you will never find it. The expansgenerators always changing affected by gravity and where they are in the universe. How far apart they are is always changing as stars are born. And black holes are creative.Everything's constantly changing so you will never find a constant
We will never know. We can only speculate.
I've always been very unsatisfied with the explanation that the universe is expanding... So astronomers say that they can tell things are spreading out, they can observe the redshift, right... I get all that. That makes sense. What doesn't make sense is how they extrapolate this to conclude that the _entire_ universe is expanding. How do they know this isn't something that's only happening locally? Why wouldn't they just conclude that the _observable_ universe is expanding? Maybe there's a good answer I just haven't heard, but the conclusion that the _entire_ universe expanding seems like a bit of a leap if the explanation is just that they can see everything spreading out... does not seem very scientific to conclude that without more evidence.
The observable universe and the known universe are one and the same. We don't know what we can't see. So they are reporting on what we know to be true. Anything beyond what we can see is simply speculation. When they say, the universe is expanding, they mean everything that we know of, is expanding. 'Locally' doesn't exist in the context of everything.
I've always had the same thought. This could be just a small section of the universe that is expanding from a single point, but that doesn't exclude that there Is more universe. It's like star formation but for our observable universe. There could be endless amounts of other big bangs within our universe The same way when a star is created there are other stars beyond it.
There's trillions and trillions universes out there that even the word trillion is only a speck of dust in the counting...
The basic mistake that is being made is the dismissal of the supernatural as being an impossibility.
The tiny little bit we can see here is what we call the Universe? And now to something completely different.
Thanks for the vid. This universe , if we look at hawkins map of it , has the path behind our local grouping folding and rolling like three forms reclining , ahead a big hole and the left of our grouping super tension emissions , the base of the map a core of dense stars. It looks to me like the bubble we were in collided with a smaller denser univers mass and that this caused the globular breakdown to our local grouping. The vareous effects in the hawkins map show this quite well , as if we could take the energy verse , and spectrum emission it to evolve local groupings of universes. In our case a smaller denser one has collided , these groupings of univeres , i mean univereses too , are where we would look upon our spectrum of light in an analasys and see a chemical base , like alcohol in a position further from core output , to where another type of chem an acid would be and so on. Except in an energy verse situation these chemistrys become universe Our local grouping has then collided and the map hawkins made shows this collision core while we fold burst and show the tensions upon what would have been our own universal formation. Globular breakdowns in process and so on. Crazy stuff realy
I read something recently that they sort of debunked dark energy.
The reason the expansion of the universe is accelerating is because of the way massive objects and their gravity warp space-time.
When you're near massive objects time moves more slowly.
So the massive empty space between galaxies and particularly between Galaxy clusters isn't really expanding faster it's just that more time has elapsed in those empty spaces. Billions of years more time in fact.
As the space between massive objects experiences more and more time the distance of that empty space from objects with mass increases causing them to experience time faster still. Hence the appearance of acceleration.
How can empty space experience faster time. There is nothing for time ro even act upon.
As there is nothing that anything can travel through faster than light, and the universe is expanding faster than light. It can only be one thing. That is to say - NOTHING!
it iis a fractal. All the maths adds up it is a fractal. When the galaxies gat far enough apart, they provide the space to allow a new galaxy to be born. Like drops on a pond.
The universe doesn't care how cool fractals look.
The courage human kind has of saying stupid things is amazing
"When the galaxies gat far enough apart..."
Great start. Don't you think your gatting thingie needs a bit more explication?
REALLY THE FIRST ADD IS ONLY 1:49 INTO WATCHING
You still see ads?
Firefox + adblock ultimate. I haven't seen an ad in over a decade.
Excellent production. Well organized script. Easy to understand. Nice background music. This humbles me as a human being. One day, there would be nothing. Perhaps we are lucky to be here. To have lived ❤❤❤❤.
The universe is baie groode en biek 📡🔭🛸📡🛰️📡🔭🪐🚀☄️🤖👾🌕🌏🤖👾🌛🌠 💯✨⭐🌟👍
Im finding it difficult to understand is light speed is a constant and can not be broken except expansion. Can any one explain please?. I thought that the galaxies were moving away at a high % of the speed of light and galaxys were being pushed apart by dark energy and both worked together as breaking the speed of light
7:30 If it breaks the laws of physics then it needs to be rethought. Magically expanding to a fantastic size then slowing in expansion to match physics must be wrong. The cumulative effect of evenly distributed expansion measured over great distances will cause an illusion that there is an edge to the universe. It is an illusion that objects 13.8 billion light years away are travelling faster than light.
All I know is that all I know now is probably wrong. Who knows what we will learn in the next 15 billion years? Probably that nothing we know now is right. Just as all we knew 15,000 years ago was quite right. There's no land of infinite reeds where gods reside and judge our souls against a feather. No giants forming mountains, no leviathans eating ships, no sky birds consuming the sun.
Obviously, you forgot about the accuracy of measurements of distant objects.
Hubble can be wrong....
His assumptions are not openly discussed
Do you think that the entire scientific community for over 100 years has been taking it on faith that Hubble was right?
And objects that are closer together are affected by gravity which affects the expansion rate
All space is full of creation! Sincerely the senior foundation creator! Note I am not Larry!
Everyone talks about space expanding but no one considers that time may be passing at different rates at different distances in space. If time passes at different rates at different distances from gravitational masses and at different rates for moving bodies then why can't time pass, or appear to pass, at different rates at massive distances away from the observer?
come on, dude , nice try though
Your results aren't consistant because you're not factoring in time. They never will be the same as time goes on, it will change.
Explain why galaxies collide.
Gravity draws them towards each other. We are presently colliding with the Sagittarius dwarf Galaxy and scheduled to collide with the Andromeda galaxy billions of years from now.
@Radrook353 but the episode went into detail about the universe expanding, why are galaxies colliding if science says they expanding in an omnidirectional "Big Bang" blast? Some Galaxies are moving forward & backward & side to side! & Some Galaxies are older than the Big Bang. JWST has really messed up this theory.
@@LocomotiveThought The ones that collide are gravitationally bound into clusters and super clusters and are not locally affected by the universal expansion in their relation to one another. For example, in our local group of galaxies, Andromeda and the Milky way are approaching each other and are scheduled to merge in the far future. Meanwhile, the voids between our super cluster and others are expanding.
@@Radrook353 Forgive my skepticism but this sounds like optimistic conjecture & speculation or perhaps Religion. Personally, I believe the universe goes on forever & if it doesn't, something else lies beyond. Fire, ice, concrete, who knows. If multiple Universes exist, then they exist in one plane of existence. My point is we have no shortage of questions & eventually it turns into religion. People say we have pictures of black holes & my response to that is, "We have pictures of Bigfoot too." It took countless Æons for you to be here, make good choices & enjoy yourself. Thank you for the conversation.
whats in the middle of the balloon
This was answered in the video. Dark Energy.
@@sillygoose2619 he was talking about the ballon model as a standarnd model of physics
Wondering if "dark energy" could be explained by centrifugal acceleration that occurred prior to the big bang. (potential catalyst for the event?)
Let's say that the matter of the universe is finite, and that is all the matter there is. Then it is expanding into nothingness, which is infinity. (it also changes within the changelessness that is eternity).
This is an easy one to awnser , whats it expanding into ??
The same as its already expanded into for billions of years now.
What bliws mme away is that phyisical reality itself exists.I know we can't ask Why does existence exist but it does.Like what?
Everything could just be shrinking
How would we be mistaking a shrinkage with an expansion?
@Radrook353 if its just the distances between everything "expanding" there would be no way to tell if "everything" was getting smaller and the distances just staying the same.
@@OblivionNoMore Doesn't the red shift of light indicate a distancing going on?
I guess that would depend on your frame of reference. Or perhaps the redshift has more to do with the time the light has traveled and not distance. I'm not saying that we are shrinking. I'm just pointing out we don't have a ruler big enough. From the point of view of the expanding space is the light even red shifted? Does the light experience redshift or are we the only ones who notice it? I don't know but these seem like questions that should be asked before forming an opinion
yeah space isn't expanding... everything is just shrinking in space at the same rate.
Why do you think everything is shrinking?
Well 99.9999% of every atom is empty space, so you're proposing that the fundamental forces that hold the structuce of atoms are changing in a way that reduces the empty void uniformly over time. Maybe darkmatter is consuming the energy of matter?
A fun idea 🎉
When all logical explanations have been exhausted, then the least likely possible scenario is probably the solution.
He has no proof.
@mightT1
Space is certainly a topic for discussion here; I don't think you know anything about your "everything," an utterly different subject.
So you're just another infantile shitposter with nonstandard capitalization on your silly little squib.
Consider yourself a posterchild for "Why the Chinese are laughing at Trump's America."
And a candidate for the most pompous anonym in the joint.
The person running the simulation is just clicking and dragging to expand the window size
When our universe was an infinitely dense singularity before the Big Bang where was it? And wherever it was, what was on the outside of that?
I, too, wonder
No need for the amount of ads
I clicked because of the question?
How is Andromeda going to hit our milky way?
how do you know theres nothing passed the observable? what if no matter how fast you can go 2x 10x100x the speed of light, you still find what you see from home ? why is that not fact but your way is? like what ifi get out to 90 billion light years out and i take the JWST and look out 90billion more light years and i see the same thing? and if you can traverse through a instant portal then you can see what you say we can never see do to the speed of expansion? sorry if this is grade school
They are not claiming that there is nothing existing past what we can observe. In fact, they are saying that what cannot be observed is like the Earth in size in comparison to an atom to what we can observe
1:11:05 Then, suddenly, from an area the size of a pin head, the next Big Bang occurs.
Another full length science fiction saga, who's main characters are Could, Possibly, and Maybe.
Neither answer makes any sense unfortunately
22:00 Okay, but why are there galaxies moving toward each other then?
23:00 okay
All universes are held together by geometries. They DON'T expand, although it seems that way. Nobody has ever mentioned the geometry of space when trying to explain universes. It is a combination of a big bang AND Steady State that make this universe possible. The only thing off of the top of my head that I can think of that people talk about that is correct, is the way that this universe will end. Black holes. :)
This illogically assumes that the compendium of reality is material and resembles what we are observing via our limited senses.
Its the caseoh effect
I have not watched this video and neither do I wish to. If you can imagine the size of the universe then go beyond and imagine a universe that is outside inside infamous
Space is in other dimensions, so it's morphing and folding all the time. Like the tesseract.
We'll just have to hang and I few billion years we still won't know. Seriously there is no outside the universe , it exists in time with neither beginning nor end.
I don’t believe in the expansion period. Something else occurred. Something outside of our known physics.
We will never have a definitive answer to the mystery of universe.. but one thing is for sure… reality is something totally beyond our intellectual capability… my own theory is if universe is expanding then there must be something on the other side that is pulling our universe towards it.. space time fabric cannot go on forever on its own… something is calling itself towards it..
Cosmic acceleration is empirical. Big bang cosmology is well-substantiated. What we understand as the fundamental forces in nature played no role in the universe's initial point of inflation.
@@RamandeepSingh-tf8vp Why can't spacetime go on forever?
@@ominous-omnipresent-they I made this assumption on the basis of my experience so far.. everything that we see around us has a start and an end as well.. this cycle of birth and death makes me believe that every element of universe including the universe itself is part of the same process.. Going by this logic Universe must have been born (big bang or perhaps something else) so its natural at some point in time it will end too..
@ Perhaps but inflation (if real) happened in plank-time. Some force that we are unaware of triggered cosmic inflation. Was it God? Could it have something to do with dark matter and dark energy? It acted as if some sort of faster than light explosion occurred. What I know is that the James Webb telescope just threw a monkey wrench in our understanding of the Universes formation. Now we have to question the age of the universe. The theory of multiverses might have something to do with so many red-shifted galaxies developing at a time we thought nothing should have developed. It’s time we go back and recalculate our mathematical models to try and understand the new data. James Webb will work its magic and begin to ask new questions we haven’t thought of yet. James Webb will ask questions that only newer, more advanced technology can tackle. Never says that we have answered all there is to answer, because our modeling is based upon the data we currently have. And, that data is just scratching the surface. We are just beginning to ask new questions that one day will further our understanding of where we came from and how we got here. Thanks for your comment!
The biggest Black Hole consists 01 ~ 50% Light 50% dark ~ switching matter and dark, Time Timing Relativity.
In first 11 minutes there was 6 ads this is unwatchable
So space is creating time
So the small things stay together, im guessing die to gravity. Does that make dark energy = anti gravity? If its pushing things apart
@09:45 Super high atm and my brain has come up with a theory, would this not be similar to say a a strong elastic band where if you slowly add heavier weights to the band the stretchier it gets but also the faster it stretches and expands while the elastic band is getting weaker ready to snap, sooooo if the universe expanding is speeding up it could just mean we are soon going to…lost my train of thought
That kinda makes sense? But don't you think scientists have already thought abt that
@HagarBaz-j6sthey have, the theory is that eventually the universe will contract until it essentially causes another big bang
Episode 3 primer fields. Watch this and everything will become clear.
The.universe as we know it is in a primer fields...inside the containment zone...hence-forth " expansion".
00-10 Time Timing relativity.010 Creation Evolution Entropy. 1 2 3 a b c
Expanding into the previous universe. EZ
WE CAN NEVER SEE BEYOND SPACE?
WE'LL DIE FIRST
1. Beretta 92x with laser red dot and hi res sights and threaded barrel 9 mm
2. Beretta cx4 storm with AR stock conversion, flat top, hi viz secondary sights, 3 moa mil grade red dot, cut down barrel shroud to accommodate threading for a dedicated 9 mm suppressor
3. Henry Long Ranger Supreme in 300 bo with a dedicated 30 cal suppressor like Silencerco Hybrid (takes AR mags) with leupold scope
4. Mossberg 500 tactical in 410 with hi viz ironsights only
5. Tikka T3x with custom Boyd stock in 6.5 CR with threaded barrel ready for Silencerco Hybrid plus ATN 4kpro scope
6. Beretta 12 ga / 20 ga OU for turkey and clays
7. Chiappa Wildcat Alaskan in 44 mag lever action takedown comes ready threaded-need to change the front sight to a high sitting high viz sight
Those are my top 7 that i use and shoot most. If the person has kids, I would suggest swapping 5 for a Henry 22 lr lever action. If the person hunts in restrictive states, then replace 7 with a Ruger No 1 in 450 bushmaster.
Regardless of firearms, i would make a BIG case for all gun owners to start using suppressors whenever possible.
Should be stating “hypothesis “ rather than “theory “!
If all galaxies are moving away from each other, why is the Andromeda galaxy colliding with the Milky way?
Because we are in a group of galaxies called our local group and the forces of gravity still affect these local groups of galaxies to interact with one another ,as we are still expanding away from other groups . if you think about it it’s like a little bubbles ,in our local group is one bubble with the gravity still attracting one another to each other ,that’s how you have galaxies that merge like our own has done before and will do again. I’m sure there’s somebody that can explain it better than me, but that’s the best I can do. Hope that gives you the general idea.
@dr.rickmarshall6697 yes, thank you.
On a space that expands like a balloon how andromeda galaxy is getting closer to the Milky Way?????????
Andromeda is part of our local galactic cluster. It’s close enough that gravity is pulling Andromeda and the Milky Way closer to each other at a faster rate than the expansion of space over the same distance. Thus, the Milky Way and Andromeda are on a collision course.
@ so you are saying that the expansion is not like the balloon, because noting in the balloon gets closer to anything else
dark energy is a hypotheses and so is dark matter
Yo mamma
The concept of an infinite universe that is constantly expanding which means that every possible scenario can exist and will exist. Like a version of me that lives my exact life in every single way exists somewhere in the universe, or that other version of me is living life with slight changes, or massive changes. Maybe I am a billionaire and have cured cancer and am a queen of the whole planet. But I digress…
The point is that the universe is so inconceivably vast that the human mind is incapable of comprehending it in a meaningful way. Just the concept of infinite is hard to grasp. I hope humanity can develop technology that allows us to travel across the expanse of space and become an intergalactic society and possibly discover intelligent life on a distant world, but not eradicate it like we tend to do
Think of the universe as a immense recycling apple shape conveyor belt that loops back on it self, in this conveyor belt matter is pushed out from the sub-atomic (the big bang), where time and matter were or are concentrated in a singular point, since this moment the universe has been expanding into a vacuum (the force they call dark matter), over billions of years because of the expansion of the universe the force that keeps matter together would break down and matter would be broken down back into the subatomic particles, this particular would accumulate/concentrate again at the subatomic level to the point where the vacuum is empty again, where the difference in pressure would start another big bang. There should be a small, almost immeasurable curvature, but as the universe ages this curvature would be more noticeable as the laws of physics reach the breaking point.
“Cepheid” seems to be pronounced differently every time it’s uttered lol
The universe is endless. Dark energy is merely the absence of darkness.
what if the universe isnt always expanding, but rather in a countless unpredictable cycle of expanding a little, contracting a little, sometimes staying the same, etc. like the ocean, how certain parts swell and others dip down, but its always changing. imagine that but on a cosmic scale.
Trillions and trillions
Energy -Black energy-Anti matter....
Finally what is it expanding into and what is that called and how many those are there and the next thing and the next, time doesn't exist and there is no beginning r end to the universe it just keeps expanding and changing let their be light is possible are probably something that is still going on instead of a one event thing.