Well, I hope the physics are good. Because it will be very interesting (purely scientific of course) to see how different gravities effect the human form ;)
People have no Idea how luck we are to have Tood as Game Director and Executive Producer. Bet if Tood retires Bethesda will sadly do a 180 and will change to the worst. Even tho Tood is a living meme he is still passionate about his games. He even said that if he had a choice he would show a Trailer for the first time a month or even a week before Launch so its fresh in Peoples minds but because that's not how Marketing workds he normally does it 6-8 Months before Launch. I just love the way he is thinking just imagine E3 you see a Trailer and announcement for your fav Bethesda game and this guy says "Oh and you can play it next Week/Month" How cool would that be.
Ya true i mean todd hasn't released a bad game yet, hope people know 76 and 4 weren't his games, even though there were to be bugs in starfield people would not really care about it just like oblivion and skyrim also witcher 3 as long as the game is legendary and fun ti play
I heard a rumor that Starfield actually is gold right now, which means it is playable right now. If that’s true then the reason why it’s taking so long to release is because they’re trying to make sure the game runs smoothly; and doesn’t end up like a certain other project •Cough• Fallout 76 •cough•
One thing I've always liked about Bethesda is that with every game they make they try to fix a problem that they had with the previous game, along with trying out completely new things. As far as game developers go, they are one of the few that actually listen to their community (*cough* Blizzard *cough*). It really seems they take all the criticism to heart and actively try to cater to their playerbase. Even though the launch of 76 was a great failure, you cannot say that they didn't put effort into shaping it into what players wanted. I have good faith.
I definitely agree except I will add to your point. Fallout 76 and among other smaller games (like mobile ones) in between the big ones really seemed to be a decision being forced by Zenimax which to me seemed like they were trying to overvalue themselves to sell to a bigger company.
@@thomasrial4444 Absolutely 76 was to boost Zenimax's value as a company to a potential buyer. There are several stories talking about how the team really hated working on it, but they were pretty much forced into the situation.
No one else does open world like Bethesda. Cyberpunk was disappointing because it was a dead world where you couldn't interact with anything outside of main/side quests, no random encounters, and it's RPG system was even worse than that of FO4. I think Starfield will definitely be an improvement over FO4 and Skyrim and if not, then there's always mods.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I talk about how bad the core gameplay and world of Cyberpunk was, and everyone says, "it was only bad because of the bugs but those are fixed now". I played on PC, so the bugs were never that bad, I was instead let down by the super linear story, half-baked RPG mechanics, and boring empty ghost town of a city!
Respectfully, I think you are missing the point of why people are skeptical. Its not that Bethesda makes games that are bad, they are just very generic and kind of boring. Back in the Oblivion/skyrim/FO3 days they were innovative leaders, but fifteen years later and we are STILL doing the EXACT same song and dance. Starfield does not look bad per se, it just looks like Fallout… but in space. Again Bethesda used to be industry leaders and they did a lot push action rpgs forward, but that was over a decade ago and Todd is still just rehashing the same old gameplay, with the same old engine, all the same bugs, and borderline incoherent narratives…. Put it this way, why should we be excited about Starfield when it looks exactly like every other Bethesda RPG…. but in space? If I am to get the same experience ive had a dozen times already why should I spend $60 when I can just boot up fallout 3?
The problem with bethesda is this: Morrowind > Oblivion > Skyrim > Fallout 3 > Fallout 4. Gone from "experimental wonder worlds" to "let's just do the same repetetive stuff as all other games and create a copy pasta of what we had before but less fun".
@@tygrahof9268 Played Skyrim, New Vegas, Fallout 4 for many many hours. The first two before I even knew how to use mods. They make good games- great games, however flawed. The mods put them over the moon. That's not being bailed out.
Starfield doesnt seem to have a vats like system. so im curious as to how different the gameplay will feel compared to fallout without that. maybe more tactical which seems cool. either way VERY VERY excited for starfield
Its split in two equally important aspects ground gameplay and space gameplay. The combat is no exception. So that's the main difference. But the actual game play vs fallout is this game seems faster paced and the weapon swap slows time vs pausing it suggesting it wants the flow to continue like doom. But we have equipment like a jump pack and lazer cutter that will be useful in combat. And docking ships will likely merge the two types of combat space and ground but we have zero gravity battles too that affect movement, grenades and bullets so there is quite a few differences from the minimal 15 minutes we have seen so far. I imagine alien artifacts and technology will come into the fold later on but that's my guess.
I don't think that's what they mean when they say procedurally generated. I think they procedurally generated the game in house. I don't think we will be getting different worlds on different play throughs.
I am very skeptical of this game, but on the other end, there’s almost no way that I wont pick this up day 1. Unfortunately Bethesda makes my favorite specific game experience…
Exactly. I’m not too worried because Bethesdas team has doubled sense fallout 4. They saw how overbearing the settlement system was in FO4 and made a point of it not being necessary unless you want to do everything. They’ve improved their procedural tech ever single game sense Morrowind (maybe not oblivion but that’s not the point). 250k lines of dialogue… Skyrim being to me Bethesdas most immersive game (not including FNV my personal favorite) having only 60k which is 4x less and the fact that it doesn’t have a voiced protagonist shows they saw the problem with modding with a voiced main character and also they can be more detailed with player choice dialogue because they don’t have to have someone say every line. Fallout 4 had Bethesdas best companions to date which shows they see what they need to do in that field. Now I’ll address what a lot of people are worried about, the 1000 planets. In real space most of the time there’s only 1 planet orbiting a sun that actually has a lot of use and not just a place for resources so to me 900 of those planets will be barren recourses gathering and radiant quest spawn locations because in reality that’s what it would most likely be (Todd mentioned they tried going more hard sci fi). Even if there’s only 15 planets that have something important on them in the 100 systems it doesn’t take away form the 985 planets that have immense modding potential. A completely barren planet could be turned into an entire quest/player made faction or city/settlement. Looking at the modders of Bethesdas games that’s going to be everywhere all over these planets (even the handcrafted ones). Also Bethesda has a lot riding on this because of zenimax trying to sell out to Microsoft by pushing mobile games/micro transactions/and 76. (which worked). Lastly brand new IP, means there’s no Lore to break 🧠
the procedural generation is only at the start of their development to get a bulk of the work out of the way. its not on the fly, everyone will be playin the same universe, they just used procedural generation to get a rough outline of the universe.
but imagine what would happen if a modder made a system to generate new stars and planets on the fly..... then added xenomorphs. and yuat'je and terminators and ..... no wait, someone already did that in fallout 4. Still, this would be the ideal game to add in xenomorphs.
What i'm really hyped for is with the planets that'll obviously have a bunch of randomly generated useless space We have more space than ever for modded content. Like every other Bethesda game either depends on the large undertaking of expanding the playspace or the chance of conflict from changing up a pre existing space. Now the odds of conflict are tiny
Plus it wasn’t that hard to skip 76. I played it free with game pass and got bored pretty rapidly and deleted it and reinstalled Skyrim again. I play Bethesda’s games for their single player open world experiences.
You're in the middle of the coping point. I hope for the best, if only because I want to pilot a star destroyer and nobody has had the balls to give me one.
Not even 6 minutes into the video and you're already telling us to pay our taxes smh Great video btw, I'm dead inside but somehow still slightly hopeful for this game
Perhaps for different reasons, but same here. There is nothing on the planet right now giving me any hope. It would be sad if a videogame saved me, but I'll take what I can get.
What I love is that these games are trying to bring back the close-up dialogue which never seems to ever work with conversations. And the fact that the main gun is just a reskin of the institute rifle
I am most certainly going to create my character after Issac Clark and excel in Engineering and crafting skills. Also I’ll download the Dead Space Engineering suit mod once it’s available.
Oh man. 6:37 I have seen the Star Wars mods for Fallout 4 for a while but I have some weird hangup with them in the Boston Wasteland. So I never downloaded any besides a blaster sfx for laser weapons. But I sure will try Star Wars mods for Starfield.
Uh oh, I'd never recommend preordering anything lol. You never know if something is good until the game is actually released. I just wanted to give a more optimistic take!
I will say this and say it again . 1. This is Todd Howard's life goal and dream. He never had a platform big enough to handle what he wanted to do. Ya'll old school gamers know what I'm talking about. 2. If you liked Skyrim and fallout. Offline games. I can about 100% garentee you'll love starfield. 3. Play all fallout 3 since new Vegas and elder scrolls Oblivion. We kinda know what they are going to put out. Not including me putting all my ideas in official release videos of what we want to see in game. Lol. I agree with you. And mods for this game could be endless! I think starfield will have the biggest and coolest mods ever made.Not to include 10 years! In the making! I think the game is going to be great. With that being said. I will say this too. Any first launch game. There will always be improvement for the next game. I mean they had to start from scratch. What I've seen so far I like. Not to include the major upgrade in dialogue. Twice as much as fallout 4. So.......
So I am not really worried to be honest. And everyone is also so freaked out about the 1000 planets. What people dont get is, for explorers we dont mind going to 900 planets that arent all interesting. As long as the other 100 are bloody awesome. That’s the thing with exploration…it’s only rewarding if cool shit doesnt come around every corner.
Hey guys i have an important question. Has anyone had any trouble with Nexus Mods today. ? I can get on the website but when i go to click on one of the tabs like Games nothing happens. I haven't been able to download any Mods today because of this. Help would be appreciated. Thanks UPDATE I found a workaround i got on Microsoft Edge. So im back to having fun. !!! 🙂
Everybody got the wrong idea with Procedural. Skyrim, Fallout 4 and 76 have Procedural Gen. It's a tool for devs so they don't have to place every fucking piece of grass and rock mesh. It doesn't mean planets are different everytime you play.
I gotta stop you, Bethesda DID NOT make the best fallout game. Obsidian made New Vegas, and they did such a good job Bethesda wont allow them to make any more. Obsidian made a Longer story line, More DLC. First EVER fallout game to have a hardcore/ survival mode. Obsidian Understood their game was janky and they fixed it, instead of relying on the modding community to fix it.
Man I LOVE obsidian and your wrong lol.. The first patch they made was LITERALLY a mod, also Bethesda has flaws but bro the best DLCs FO has had is either Far Harbor or Nuka World.. MORE doesn't mean BETTER and people REALLY over exaggerate how much modders do for the games as a whole.. I've NEVER had a mod on FO game cause I've ONLY played on console, same as most others who play on console which is actually the MAJORITY of FO and TES consumers not PC players..
@@KTdaLibertian Actually the first thing released for New Vegas was a Patch to fix the game 3 hours after it released on the xbox 360. Far Harbor was a puddle with minimal amount of Rads. In fallout 3 there are areas that reach 3000k rads a second. Dont go into lore with me. I played the fallout games that Weren't designed by BeThEsDa. If you dont enjoy playing on hardcore than dont play it.
I’m very concerned this is going to be unavoidably linear. Puddle jumping from planet to planet to space station, is going to have limitations. Hopefully it’s not Mass Effect linear…
Spot on every second of this video. Here's hoping starfield doesn't disappoint.... Right, Bethesda? Hahahahah please don't have a giant launch me into the stratosphere
A lot of the concern I hear about Starfield is that all of the explorable celestial bodies will make the game world feel empty- except like? Space is empty. I mean it's not because literally everything is in space but? If every single moon, planet, and asteroid was populated with massive sprawling cities and man made structures? It would feel way too fantastical for my taste. Most objects in space are just boring colorless rocks. Most boring colorless rocks are not suitable for human colonization. As long as the *populated areas* are detailed and dense and interesting, I don't really care how many boring colorless rocks the game tells me I can visit. Small populated areas surrounded by the true emptiness of space is HOW IT SHOULD BE
EA sure refuse to make open world Star Wars game, but we will got it with Ubisoft Star Wars game, The Division style, because its made by The Division studio
I don’t know…think I’ve had enough Skyrim / Fallout for a lifetime even if they change the skins to a space theme. Maybe because I’ve been there with NMS
Why does everyone go straight to Cyberpunk as a triple a failure, pretty sure that Fallout 76 was a pretty huge failure long before CP2077. “Bethesda does open world the very best.” Bohemia Interactive says hold my beer!
I mean even '76 did relatively okay at launch and only improved over time*. Actual failures look like Battleborn, Lawbreakers, or Anthem, 'shit that's either DOA or kicks the bucket in a couple months. Gamers being mad that their expectations aren't met or that they _just_ get a mid-tier product don't have a great reference for what failure actually is because the real failures get forgotten. *still no excuse for the working conditions at Bethesda during initial development nor the shit they got hurled at them by players
prob cause everyone knew 76 was online from the start with no npcs and that lowered ppl expectations, especially when it reused f4 assets and it was bethesdas first online game, which would mean even more bugs than a single player game, again, lowering even more expectations meanwhile cyberpunk was hyping themselves up to unrealistic expectations while they new the game wasnt ready for launch making their failure even worse
@@courirnorte8137 cannot disagree with anything you said. One thing I disliked about FO76 was Howard’s attempt at hype with saying improved graphics which I for one never saw. But I was running an older PS4.
@@sonarmb difference being we know about Todd's sweet little lies, but I agree...meanwhile CDPR was apparently the pinnacle of game devs and a lot of people fell for the hype, which they garnered themselves
I take massive offense to something you said in this video. You said it could be worthy of hundreds of hours of play. This offends me because I will be playing for thousands of hours even if its bad. As a person on the internet, I expect people to be more sensitive to my reality.
im so not interested in bethesdas games other than elder scrolls. i wish todd would realize that we're not bethesda fans, we're game series fans. personally i hate gunplay in an engine that reminds me of elder scrolls, and the fallouts worlds are so boringly filled with generic assets and depressing level design. The cold harsh snow of Skyrim was already hard to swallow when stuck with it for a fucking decade, i want fantasy universes like Oblivion. TES6 world will have to be genius to not be a bunch of rocks reminding us of nanite advertisement.
Launch is predictable: It will have bugs and Non-Bethesda fans will hate it. There is no way to eliminate all bugs and haters will find them. That being said, it will be popular to hate Starfield, but I'll be playing and loving it.
There's something in the medieval fantasy world,which draw's people towards it,and that's why i think bethesda should have done the sequel for ES serie.
My biggest problem with it is that it simply looks like a shinier No Mans Sky. I saw nothing about it that really distinguished it or set it out from the crowd.
@@spacedoutmonkey668 Given that resource acquisition, the procedural generation of planets and animals looks identical to No Mans Sky, yeah I call bullshit. It looks shinier and that is about it. They need to try harder.
@@varmastiko2908 As of right now I simply do not see anything that entices me to buy it. They need to bring more to the table or they need to simply not bother.
@@paulallen8304 Unlike NMS, Starfield will have good fleshed out characters and storyline, better ship customization, better settlement building, more impacting A.I and so on. If you don't want the game thats fine, but companies take good ideas from other games all the time, Bethesda is just going to refine NMS ideas, make them better and then add their own ideas to gel the game together.
really? they lost a lot of my trust with the trilogy remaster also not putting out any dlc for single player in gta 5 was a huge let down. dan houser leaving rockstar a couple years ago isnt a good sign either.
Used to be a die hard Bethesda fan, used to be. After you wake up you realize it’s run by an incompetent fool, the company could care less about gamers and they never actually play their own bug infested products. Such a company with a real business model would dedicate full teams to their bread and butter which is two names, Elder Scrolls and Fallout. It pays the over bloated salaries and keeps the lights on. Instead it robs Peter to pay Paul and because of this choice it’s revenue goes in huge waves of up and then down with decades in between their two money makers. And because of this choice you end up with re re re re releases of a game that’s been out of date since the year it was released to fill the coffers that have run dry which lead to Microsoft swooping then you instead of becoming the empire it could have become. The only smart thing it did was make it available to mod as the modding community is the only star that shines bright with regards to Bethesda, and for whom without the company would no longer exist, how many times can play a bug riddled glitchy bland blah boring and empty game with a story line so gapping you could drive a 18 wheeler through, sideways.
I read Starfield Has Over 250K Lines of dialogue, that sounds almost too good to be true :p but it looks really good and I hope they make coop. I liked this video can really tell you play these games.
With no voiced protag, and yet more than double the lines in fallout 4, it makes me hopeful this will finally be another FPS-RPG that actually delivers on a good roleplaying experience where you can play your own character the way you want and make choices that matter. But at the same time, I'm worried that the amount of dialog is misleading because they're counting "voice variants", like there's a bunch of random settlers in fallout 4 but there's like 5 or 6 voice actors they use for all of them. Maybe starfield has just as much "real" dialog as fallout 4 but they just have like 15 or 20 different VAs for the random settlers, and more random combat barks for enemies and junk lol
Fallout 4 is very similar to the 1980s rpg module "The Ruins Of Chicago". I reckon Starfield will be similar to an old pc space game where you had to search for artifacts and beat the opposition who are also searching. I am hoping for better combat than the FO4 bullet-sponge snowball fight system. Visually I think Starfield will be a let-down. The plot as well. 20% longer than FO4 means completion by about level 25.
There will be a moment for a lot of gamers floating above a glowing blue world like earth with the inky black dotted with the white glowing of new adventures. And it will click that this game is worth the wait, the astronomical money it likely cost to make. And that fallout 76 was probably just made to quell investors financial worries. See since morrowind in 2002 there hasn't been a single..single player game to not receive multiple game of the year awards. So if this game is the first single player game to flop at bethesda it's the first in 21 years, The only game I know of to relese in that 21 years and to recive over 6 years development is morrowind, the most creative and weird of all elderscrolls games and that's the game I see starfield like the most, Alien, hostile, rpg and character focused, and mysterious from a story perspective. So I'm exited I think it's a safe bet.
Bethesda is good at keeping things simple, shallow, yet fun. I think they should hold that motto for starfield as well. I’m pretty sure they have. That crappy starfield gunplay looks worse than fallout 4. That’s the Bethesda we know and love. I’d personally rather have a fallout 3 remake by them, but I guess I’ll settle for nerdy space crap
starfield can honestly be their most dog crap release, the new creative engine & modders with a world that big pretty much guarantees a great game in the future. im excited af to mess around with bringing in my own projects into starfield.
after shit shows like no man's sky, cyberpunk, and the 10000 other games that have betrayed us people are just quick to draw on the whole game's trash don't trust them mentality. I still trust Bethesda on single-player games, and hell fallout 76 is an enjoyable game now I have a few 100 hours on it even after skipping out on the launch.
Bugthesda has a long long looooooooooong track record of bugs. So much so it takes a 3rd party be it company or fans to fix it. There is no indication this will be different. In fact, it has every indication it will be a buggy unbalanced mess. :(. Hope, but verify. No pre orders.!
I have one word to counter you on every hope that it'll be good... . .. ... ....Emil... The game will be terrible. The End. It looks like "No Man's Oblivion", and with Emil behind its "creative" elements, it'll be bland and uninteresting and boring... and lore? Lore will be basically non-existent. Or, you and everyone else will have "AMNESIA!", and not know any history. Because, "Why write a compelling backstory, that no one's going to read?"...IN AN RPG!!! *ahem* So yeah, its gonna suck, because Emil sucks.
@@Nemesis-222 Except Cyberpunk was actually good and not nearly as buggy as people let on. People seem to let it pass that every Bethesda title is busted not only on release but forever. At the very least, what problems effected some (key word: some, I had very little) has been fixed. Also, Edgerunners was done by Studio Trigger - one of the most popular studios in the industry. People need to stop jerking off Bethesda. I used to love them too - stop giving them money for their greed and garbage.
@@Etherealizer - You're obviously having a laugh, "Cyberpunk not nearly as buggy as people let on", it was three months before I could even play it on my highend system. I had a i9-8 core 32 Gig. when this garbage was released. Yes, it was complete garbage. It's still buggy as hell, infact, it's a joke. Garbage physics, empty world, thrown together in a hurry, It's only redeeming feature is the characters, everything else was an afterthought, like the crafting lol.
@@Nemesis-222 People also just dismiss the fact about 100% of the RPG systems CDPR promised just weren't there and NEVER will be implemented.. People forgot you where supposed to be able to join Factions, each was said to have a storyline, NPCs where supposed to live daily lives, body augmentations where supposed to be do ANYTHING.. Clothing was supposed to be like armor with stat increases and decreases, the cops were supposed to be intuitive and change tactics... It's a bunch of stuff CDPR had promised but was never in the game.. Bethesdas NEVER done that with a game..
Most likely, like most games these days, especially "Bethesda Games", Starfield will be a good game EVENTUALLY, after the community patched the majority of the bugs and implements some needed live improvement features!
If only people could just keep identity Politics out of modern games. WTF is Body Type 1-3, Male and Female is all that's needed, and you'd think would be easier to make.
@@varmastiko2908 and some Saints Row levels of cringy dialog. "Seee climate changed killed this planet" and "Uhhh white people are so bad" or "look how bad capitisim is, even though its helped more people out of poverty than any other economy type"
You bring up Cyberpunk.. as an example of an AAA disappointment.. on a video about Bethesda game.... dude.. Pre-ordering Bethesda game is a whatever. "Don't pre-order cause you are paying for unfinished product" is kinda hollow when it comes.... fucking beating a dead horse at this point.. Positive #1: that is not a plus anymore. Nor a bare minimum. Need to do much better than that. Positive #2: Why didn't you just say "no online, it's offline" Positive #3: Because Bethesda fans are the easiest to make happy? They eat anything with Bethesda logo on it? "But FO76" shut up and read one line up. I could go further, but the aforementioned horse really is quite far into decaying process. This is the point that I have the most issues here. You talk so much about a game they haven't made.. I think ever. Positive #4: Eeehhh... whataboutism.. Positive #5: I already support you on Patreon Positive #5 again: Sure, but no, and yes.. Reason why I support you is the mod content, because mods make FO4 playable in the first place. Now that the general standard for what is considered OK for games has gone way up, I can't see myself playing any Bethesda game without mods. Modders are the one that make these games enjoyable. Positive #6: Fine. I'd go with superior WH40K. Positive #7: No.. just no.. Procedural generation is... remember "radiant quests" from Skyrim and FO4? Positive #8: Fine again. Pointless, doesn't add value, but fine. Positive #9: Bare minimum. See P#3. Positive #10: How is this positive? What reputation? ...... the horse is dead.... it's very dead... It will be broken, you know that. "Hey, Voramon, why are you so negative?!" Because I have no faith in Bethesda. I have faith in modders. Reason why I'm subbed to this channel. To find some nice mods so that...... The horse is dead! Stop going on about it.. That's me talking to myself..
Hoping for a Lydia mod before the game is even a week old
Only if she says: “Oh a cave, wonder what’s inside!” every time you leave a cave
I am sworn to carry your burdens...
“Toad Howard” 🐸
Well, I hope the physics are good. Because it will be very interesting (purely scientific of course) to see how different gravities effect the human form ;)
Lydia will be immortalised, i'd bet on that
People have no Idea how luck we are to have Tood as Game Director and Executive Producer. Bet if Tood retires Bethesda will sadly do a 180 and will change to the worst. Even tho Tood is a living meme he is still passionate about his games. He even said that if he had a choice he would show a Trailer for the first time a month or even a week before Launch so its fresh in Peoples minds but because that's not how Marketing workds he normally does it 6-8 Months before Launch. I just love the way he is thinking just imagine E3 you see a Trailer and announcement for your fav Bethesda game and this guy says "Oh and you can play it next Week/Month" How cool would that be.
Wasn't Fallout 4 sort of like that?
It had an spectacular launch before the community noticed the lack of hard RPG features
Ya true i mean todd hasn't released a bad game yet, hope people know 76 and 4 weren't his games, even though there were to be bugs in starfield people would not really care about it just like oblivion and skyrim also witcher 3 as long as the game is legendary and fun ti play
You spelling it tood 3 separate times confirms that you did it intentionally and this disturbs me greatly
@@trissmerigold7722 Fallout 4 was definitely his game, and it was not a bad game by any means.
@@shriyanshpandey112 he didn't design it, just presented it look up
I really hope this game is not rushed. I just want them to take time with it🥺
I heard a rumor that Starfield actually is gold right now, which means it is playable right now. If that’s true then the reason why it’s taking so long to release is because they’re trying to make sure the game runs smoothly; and doesn’t end up like a certain other project
•Cough• Fallout 76 •cough•
That's why it's delayed and possibly delayed again
@@Keitto191 oh my god im so fucking hype for starfield. im so tired of playing skyrim and Fo4 with 2000 mods wabbajack lists.
Bethesda never takes their time with games, every single game of theirs has tons of cut content due to rushing
One thing I've always liked about Bethesda is that with every game they make they try to fix a problem that they had with the previous game, along with trying out completely new things. As far as game developers go, they are one of the few that actually listen to their community (*cough* Blizzard *cough*). It really seems they take all the criticism to heart and actively try to cater to their playerbase. Even though the launch of 76 was a great failure, you cannot say that they didn't put effort into shaping it into what players wanted. I have good faith.
I definitely agree except I will add to your point.
Fallout 76 and among other smaller games (like mobile ones) in between the big ones really seemed to be a decision being forced by Zenimax which to me seemed like they were trying to overvalue themselves to sell to a bigger company.
@@thomasrial4444
Absolutely 76 was to boost Zenimax's value as a company to a potential buyer.
There are several stories talking about how the team really hated working on it, but they were pretty much forced into the situation.
@@jossebrodeur6033 and that’s the reason why I’m not worried about Starfield like everyone else seems to be sense Bethesda has been bought.
5:49 I have been officially rustled, mods have changed my skyrim experience so many times in so many ways, wonderful indeed.
No one else does open world like Bethesda. Cyberpunk was disappointing because it was a dead world where you couldn't interact with anything outside of main/side quests, no random encounters, and it's RPG system was even worse than that of FO4. I think Starfield will definitely be an improvement over FO4 and Skyrim and if not, then there's always mods.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I talk about how bad the core gameplay and world of Cyberpunk was, and everyone says, "it was only bad because of the bugs but those are fixed now". I played on PC, so the bugs were never that bad, I was instead let down by the super linear story, half-baked RPG mechanics, and boring empty ghost town of a city!
Respectfully, I think you are missing the point of why people are skeptical. Its not that Bethesda makes games that are bad, they are just very generic and kind of boring. Back in the Oblivion/skyrim/FO3 days they were innovative leaders, but fifteen years later and we are STILL doing the EXACT same song and dance. Starfield does not look bad per se, it just looks like Fallout… but in space. Again Bethesda used to be industry leaders and they did a lot push action rpgs forward, but that was over a decade ago and Todd is still just rehashing the same old gameplay, with the same old engine, all the same bugs, and borderline incoherent narratives….
Put it this way, why should we be excited about Starfield when it looks exactly like every other Bethesda RPG…. but in space? If I am to get the same experience ive had a dozen times already why should I spend $60 when I can just boot up fallout 3?
The problem with bethesda is this: Morrowind > Oblivion > Skyrim > Fallout 3 > Fallout 4. Gone from "experimental wonder worlds" to "let's just do the same repetetive stuff as all other games and create a copy pasta of what we had before but less fun".
This game will be amazing... two years after release once the modders have truly dug into it.
I'll take it.
Bethesda + Modders = A good game. Without modders = 0/10.
@@tygrahof9268 That is not true, my friend. Lol.
@@MoonisHavn Examples? State your examples. Bethesda has thrived on HOPE and bailed out EVER TIME by modders. So again state your examples...
@@tygrahof9268 Played Skyrim, New Vegas, Fallout 4 for many many hours. The first two before I even knew how to use mods. They make good games- great games, however flawed. The mods put them over the moon. That's not being bailed out.
Starfield doesnt seem to have a vats like system. so im curious as to how different the gameplay will feel compared to fallout without that. maybe more tactical which seems cool. either way VERY VERY excited for starfield
honestly, its’ll probably have some kind of bullet-time whether it be a feature or part of a skilltree
Its split in two equally important aspects ground gameplay and space gameplay.
The combat is no exception. So that's the main difference.
But the actual game play vs fallout is this game seems faster paced and the weapon swap slows time vs pausing it suggesting it wants the flow to continue like doom.
But we have equipment like a jump pack and lazer cutter that will be useful in combat.
And docking ships will likely merge the two types of combat space and ground but we have zero gravity battles too that affect movement, grenades and bullets so there is quite a few differences from the minimal 15 minutes we have seen so far.
I imagine alien artifacts and technology will come into the fold later on but that's my guess.
modders will add a vats system.
I don't think that's what they mean when they say procedurally generated. I think they procedurally generated the game in house. I don't think we will be getting different worlds on different play throughs.
Yes, it helps the developers but every player will experience the same worlds. Thats what i think too.
another great video as always, keep it up!
I am very skeptical of this game, but on the other end, there’s almost no way that I wont pick this up day 1. Unfortunately Bethesda makes my favorite specific game experience…
Exactly.
I’m not too worried because Bethesdas team has doubled sense fallout 4. They saw how overbearing the settlement system was in FO4 and made a point of it not being necessary unless you want to do everything. They’ve improved their procedural tech ever single game sense Morrowind (maybe not oblivion but that’s not the point).
250k lines of dialogue… Skyrim being to me Bethesdas most immersive game (not including FNV my personal favorite) having only 60k which is 4x less and the fact that it doesn’t have a voiced protagonist shows they saw the problem with modding with a voiced main character and also they can be more detailed with player choice dialogue because they don’t have to have someone say every line.
Fallout 4 had Bethesdas best companions to date which shows they see what they need to do in that field.
Now I’ll address what a lot of people are worried about, the 1000 planets. In real space most of the time there’s only 1 planet orbiting a sun that actually has a lot of use and not just a place for resources so to me 900 of those planets will be barren recourses gathering and radiant quest spawn locations because in reality that’s what it would most likely be (Todd mentioned they tried going more hard sci fi). Even if there’s only 15 planets that have something important on them in the 100 systems it doesn’t take away form the 985 planets that have immense modding potential. A completely barren planet could be turned into an entire quest/player made faction or city/settlement. Looking at the modders of Bethesdas games that’s going to be everywhere all over these planets (even the handcrafted ones).
Also Bethesda has a lot riding on this because of zenimax trying to sell out to Microsoft by pushing mobile games/micro transactions/and 76. (which worked).
Lastly brand new IP, means there’s no Lore to break 🧠
the procedural generation is only at the start of their development to get a bulk of the work out of the way. its not on the fly, everyone will be playin the same universe, they just used procedural generation to get a rough outline of the universe.
but imagine what would happen if a modder made a system to generate new stars and planets on the fly..... then added xenomorphs. and yuat'je and terminators and ..... no wait, someone already did that in fallout 4. Still, this would be the ideal game to add in xenomorphs.
What i'm really hyped for is with the planets that'll obviously have a bunch of randomly generated useless space
We have more space than ever for modded content. Like every other Bethesda game either depends on the large undertaking of expanding the playspace or the chance of conflict from changing up a pre existing space. Now the odds of conflict are tiny
1 thing i love about it already is the no hit markers
It was confirmed that they were working on starfield when Fall out 76 was still in production . So he was more active on the starfield team side
Plus it wasn’t that hard to skip 76. I played it free with game pass and got bored pretty rapidly and deleted it and reinstalled Skyrim again. I play Bethesda’s games for their single player open world experiences.
You're in the middle of the coping point. I hope for the best, if only because I want to pilot a star destroyer and nobody has had the balls to give me one.
Not even 6 minutes into the video and you're already telling us to pay our taxes smh
Great video btw, I'm dead inside but somehow still slightly hopeful for this game
Perhaps for different reasons, but same here. There is nothing on the planet right now giving me any hope.
It would be sad if a videogame saved me, but I'll take what I can get.
Koubits channel is my comfy place. Thanky.
What I love is that these games are trying to bring back the close-up dialogue which never seems to ever work with conversations. And the fact that the main gun is just a reskin of the institute rifle
Getting excited for the inevitable Minecraft letsplay episode 1 season 1.
Getting excited for the "I did your mom, in Minecraft" jokes.
Just found your channel and subscribed 💃 💃 love the Skyrim mods 😁😁😀😀
I am most certainly going to create my character after Issac Clark and excel in Engineering and crafting skills.
Also I’ll download the Dead Space Engineering suit mod once it’s available.
Cautiously salivating is such a mood
The laser rifle in Starfield looks exactly like the Institute rifle!!
I'm so glad you pointed out how this game feels like cyberpunk
''Why You're Wrong About Starfield''
well, i think its gonna be a bethesda game, and at this time nothing else. you telling me now its not?
Damn, you think its a bethesda game, youre gonna be in for a rude awakening.... its actually EA/s
So many mixed responses ones that say dont be excited others that say be excited
Yeah
Okay. That byke steal-Run-Fail was my subscription.
Oh man. 6:37 I have seen the Star Wars mods for Fallout 4 for a while but I have some weird hangup with them in the Boston Wasteland. So I never downloaded any besides a blaster sfx for laser weapons. But I sure will try Star Wars mods for Starfield.
Good lord you are funny love the delivery. I think I’ll stick around and sub
"My spit is tainted with fear" - Koubitz, 2022.
This video convinced me to preorder the game and turn my hype up to MAX
Uh oh, I'd never recommend preordering anything lol. You never know if something is good until the game is actually released. I just wanted to give a more optimistic take!
@@Koubitz Koubitz
@@Koubitz I'm going to preorder *so hard*!
@@Koubitz Dang, yeah, you're right - I should wait until they announce the collector's edition and then preorder _that_ :D
My biggest problem with Fallout 4 was that I guessed and fully expected the plot twist :/
I will say this and say it again . 1. This is Todd Howard's life goal and dream. He never had a platform big enough to handle what he wanted to do. Ya'll old school gamers know what I'm talking about. 2. If you liked Skyrim and fallout. Offline games. I can about 100% garentee you'll love starfield. 3. Play all fallout 3 since new Vegas and elder scrolls Oblivion. We kinda know what they are going to put out. Not including me putting all my ideas in official release videos of what we want to see in game. Lol. I agree with you. And mods for this game could be endless! I think starfield will have the biggest and coolest mods ever made.Not to include 10 years! In the making! I think the game is going to be great. With that being said. I will say this too. Any first launch game. There will always be improvement for the next game. I mean they had to start from scratch. What I've seen so far I like. Not to include the major upgrade in dialogue. Twice as much as fallout 4. So.......
I'm not alone! I thought I was crazy when I had the feeling of Fallout 4 being too linear as well. :/
Entertaining. Thanks for the video. 👍
I love how Star Wars mods has it own section in the video 😂
So I am not really worried to be honest. And everyone is also so freaked out about the 1000 planets. What people dont get is, for explorers we dont mind going to 900 planets that arent all interesting. As long as the other 100 are bloody awesome.
That’s the thing with exploration…it’s only rewarding if cool shit doesnt come around every corner.
agreed thinking back to fallout 3 searching every empty room searching for the one room with something interesting.
I just hope that there is continuous travel between planets, and from orbit to the surface. I really hope it isn’t teleportation.
Twitch link doesn't work.
I liked this a lot! Thank you for good content 👍🏻
Don't worry..
It'll just work. [TM]
Especially after the modders fix it.
Hey guys i have an important question. Has anyone had any trouble with Nexus Mods today. ? I can get on the website but when i go to click on one of the tabs like Games nothing happens. I haven't been able to download any Mods today because of this. Help would be appreciated. Thanks UPDATE I found a workaround i got on Microsoft Edge. So im back to having fun. !!! 🙂
Right on. Thanks for sharing.
Everybody got the wrong idea with Procedural.
Skyrim, Fallout 4 and 76 have Procedural Gen. It's a tool for devs so they don't have to place every fucking piece of grass and rock mesh.
It doesn't mean planets are different everytime you play.
My volume was turned up and salivating with fear almost broke my ear drums 🤣🤣
I gotta stop you, Bethesda DID NOT make the best fallout game. Obsidian made New Vegas, and they did such a good job Bethesda wont allow them to make any more. Obsidian made a Longer story line, More DLC. First EVER fallout game to have a hardcore/ survival mode. Obsidian Understood their game was janky and they fixed it, instead of relying on the modding community to fix it.
Man I LOVE obsidian and your wrong lol.. The first patch they made was LITERALLY a mod, also Bethesda has flaws but bro the best DLCs FO has had is either Far Harbor or Nuka World.. MORE doesn't mean BETTER and people REALLY over exaggerate how much modders do for the games as a whole.. I've NEVER had a mod on FO game cause I've ONLY played on console, same as most others who play on console which is actually the MAJORITY of FO and TES consumers not PC players..
@@KTdaLibertian Actually the first thing released for New Vegas was a Patch to fix the game 3 hours after it released on the xbox 360. Far Harbor was a puddle with minimal amount of Rads. In fallout 3 there are areas that reach 3000k rads a second. Dont go into lore with me. I played the fallout games that Weren't designed by BeThEsDa. If you dont enjoy playing on hardcore than dont play it.
Game looks Toddtacular to me. I can't wait.
I think this game will be fine, and I think Bethesda has not learned any lessons from the past four years take that as you will
I’m very concerned this is going to be unavoidably linear. Puddle jumping from planet to planet to space station, is going to have limitations. Hopefully it’s not Mass Effect linear…
Spot on every second of this video. Here's hoping starfield doesn't disappoint.... Right, Bethesda? Hahahahah please don't have a giant launch me into the stratosphere
A lot of the concern I hear about Starfield is that all of the explorable celestial bodies will make the game world feel empty- except like? Space is empty. I mean it's not because literally everything is in space but? If every single moon, planet, and asteroid was populated with massive sprawling cities and man made structures? It would feel way too fantastical for my taste. Most objects in space are just boring colorless rocks. Most boring colorless rocks are not suitable for human colonization. As long as the *populated areas* are detailed and dense and interesting, I don't really care how many boring colorless rocks the game tells me I can visit. Small populated areas surrounded by the true emptiness of space is HOW IT SHOULD BE
EA sure refuse to make open world Star Wars game, but we will got it with Ubisoft Star Wars game, The Division style, because its made by The Division studio
I don’t know…think I’ve had enough Skyrim / Fallout for a lifetime even if they change the skins to a space theme. Maybe because I’ve been there with NMS
Why does everyone go straight to Cyberpunk as a triple a failure, pretty sure that Fallout 76 was a pretty huge failure long before CP2077. “Bethesda does open world the very best.” Bohemia Interactive says hold my beer!
I mean even '76 did relatively okay at launch and only improved over time*. Actual failures look like Battleborn, Lawbreakers, or Anthem, 'shit that's either DOA or kicks the bucket in a couple months. Gamers being mad that their expectations aren't met or that they _just_ get a mid-tier product don't have a great reference for what failure actually is because the real failures get forgotten.
*still no excuse for the working conditions at Bethesda during initial development nor the shit they got hurled at them by players
@@username1660 agreed, FO76 main failure was more a marketing failure. CB2077 was a shareholder pressuring failure.
prob cause everyone knew 76 was online from the start with no npcs and that lowered ppl expectations, especially when it reused f4 assets and it was bethesdas first online game, which would mean even more bugs than a single player game, again, lowering even more expectations
meanwhile cyberpunk was hyping themselves up to unrealistic expectations while they new the game wasnt ready for launch making their failure even worse
@@courirnorte8137 cannot disagree with anything you said. One thing I disliked about FO76 was Howard’s attempt at hype with saying improved graphics which I for one never saw. But I was running an older PS4.
@@sonarmb difference being we know about Todd's sweet little lies, but I agree...meanwhile CDPR was apparently the pinnacle of game devs and a lot of people fell for the hype, which they garnered themselves
Lets be real, no matter what state the game releases in, modders will fix it and make it better.
thanks Koubitz!
I take massive offense to something you said in this video. You said it could be worthy of hundreds of hours of play. This offends me because I will be playing for thousands of hours even if its bad. As a person on the internet, I expect people to be more sensitive to my reality.
im so not interested in bethesdas games other than elder scrolls. i wish todd would realize that we're not bethesda fans, we're game series fans. personally i hate gunplay in an engine that reminds me of elder scrolls, and the fallouts worlds are so boringly filled with generic assets and depressing level design. The cold harsh snow of Skyrim was already hard to swallow when stuck with it for a fucking decade, i want fantasy universes like Oblivion. TES6 world will have to be genius to not be a bunch of rocks reminding us of nanite advertisement.
Launch is predictable: It will have bugs and Non-Bethesda fans will hate it. There is no way to eliminate all bugs and haters will find them. That being said, it will be popular to hate Starfield, but I'll be playing and loving it.
There's something in the medieval fantasy world,which draw's people towards it,and that's why i think bethesda should have done the sequel for ES serie.
My biggest problem with it is that it simply looks like a shinier No Mans Sky. I saw nothing about it that really distinguished it or set it out from the crowd.
Just because its in space doesn't mean its no man's sky
@@spacedoutmonkey668 Given that resource acquisition, the procedural generation of planets and animals looks identical to No Mans Sky, yeah I call bullshit. It looks shinier and that is about it. They need to try harder.
If it has clear similarities to NMS it doesn't mean that's automatically a bad thing. All shooters have guns for example and it's hardly a problem.
@@varmastiko2908 As of right now I simply do not see anything that entices me to buy it. They need to bring more to the table or they need to simply not bother.
@@paulallen8304 Unlike NMS, Starfield will have good fleshed out characters and storyline, better ship customization, better settlement building, more impacting A.I and so on.
If you don't want the game thats fine, but companies take good ideas from other games all the time, Bethesda is just going to refine NMS ideas, make them better and then add their own ideas to gel the game together.
The only company I can trust for quality when it comes to games is Rockstar gta 6 is gonna be lit
really? they lost a lot of my trust with the trilogy remaster also not putting out any dlc for single player in gta 5 was a huge let down. dan houser leaving rockstar a couple years ago isnt a good sign either.
@@bryanprice2800 true I wish red dead redemption 2 had a story dlc like something to do with vampires
what? gta trilogy? remember that? lol
@@KennedyandKairishow I'm basing it off rdr2 not the trilogy for quality
Please post more gameplay compilations
Used to be a die hard Bethesda fan, used to be. After you wake up you realize it’s run by an incompetent fool, the company could care less about gamers and they never actually play their own bug infested products. Such a company with a real business model would dedicate full teams to their bread and butter which is two names, Elder Scrolls and Fallout. It pays the over bloated salaries and keeps the lights on. Instead it robs Peter to pay Paul and because of this choice it’s revenue goes in huge waves of up and then down with decades in between their two money makers. And because of this choice you end up with re re re re releases of a game that’s been out of date since the year it was released to fill the coffers that have run dry which lead to Microsoft swooping then you instead of becoming the empire it could have become. The only smart thing it did was make it available to mod as the modding community is the only star that shines bright with regards to Bethesda, and for whom without the company would no longer exist, how many times can play a bug riddled glitchy bland blah boring and empty game with a story line so gapping you could drive a 18 wheeler through, sideways.
I read Starfield Has Over 250K Lines of dialogue, that sounds almost too good to be true :p but it looks really good and I hope they make coop. I liked this video can really tell you play these games.
16 times the dialogue...
With no voiced protag, and yet more than double the lines in fallout 4, it makes me hopeful this will finally be another FPS-RPG that actually delivers on a good roleplaying experience where you can play your own character the way you want and make choices that matter. But at the same time, I'm worried that the amount of dialog is misleading because they're counting "voice variants", like there's a bunch of random settlers in fallout 4 but there's like 5 or 6 voice actors they use for all of them. Maybe starfield has just as much "real" dialog as fallout 4 but they just have like 15 or 20 different VAs for the random settlers, and more random combat barks for enemies and junk lol
Anyone has ever seen Koubitz's face?
Todd better thank the Modders for saving Starfield.
"Cautiously salivating" 😆
Trust not a hope, it has forsaken these lands
The New Vegas mod for F4. Nuff said..
Hi. A good point :)
like pokemon with scarlet and violet this is Bethesdas last chance for me.
Fallout 4 is very similar to the 1980s rpg module "The Ruins Of Chicago". I reckon Starfield will be similar to an old pc space game where you had to search for artifacts and beat the opposition who are also searching. I am hoping for better combat than the FO4 bullet-sponge snowball fight system. Visually I think Starfield will be a let-down. The plot as well. 20% longer than FO4 means completion by about level 25.
There will be a moment for a lot of gamers floating above a glowing blue world like earth with the inky black dotted with the white glowing of new adventures.
And it will click that this game is worth the wait, the astronomical money it likely cost to make.
And that fallout 76 was probably just made to quell investors financial worries.
See since morrowind in 2002 there hasn't been a single..single player game to not receive multiple game of the year awards.
So if this game is the first single player game to flop at bethesda it's the first in 21 years,
The only game I know of to relese in that 21 years and to recive over 6 years development is morrowind, the most creative and weird of all elderscrolls games and that's the game I see starfield like the most,
Alien, hostile, rpg and character focused, and mysterious from a story perspective.
So I'm exited I think it's a safe bet.
If you shown me a clip of Starfield and told me it was a mod for Fallout 4 i'd believe it.
Bethesda is good at keeping things simple, shallow, yet fun. I think they should hold that motto for starfield as well. I’m pretty sure they have. That crappy starfield gunplay looks worse than fallout 4. That’s the Bethesda we know and love. I’d personally rather have a fallout 3 remake by them, but I guess I’ll settle for nerdy space crap
starfield can honestly be their most dog crap release, the new creative engine & modders with a world that big pretty much guarantees a great game in the future. im excited af to mess around with bringing in my own projects into starfield.
Lol'd for real twice. You get a like and subscribe!
Bethesda games are the best. Starfield will be Game of The Decade.
after shit shows like no man's sky, cyberpunk, and the 10000 other games that have betrayed us people are just quick to draw on the whole game's trash don't trust them mentality. I still trust Bethesda on single-player games, and hell fallout 76 is an enjoyable game now I have a few 100 hours on it even after skipping out on the launch.
Let's be honest. We don't want a bug free Bethesda games. We want the memes.
True
... Starfield will be awesome 👍😎....
become a minecraft youtuber, a fate worse than death... lol. Ah hell, I'm still laughing.
Tell them to delay it until 2025.
Bugthesda has a long long looooooooooong track record of bugs. So much so it takes a 3rd party be it company or fans to fix it. There is no indication this will be different. In fact, it has every indication it will be a buggy unbalanced mess. :(. Hope, but verify. No pre orders.!
Something tells me this game will be lackluster :/
I have one word to counter you on every hope that it'll be good...
.
..
...
....Emil...
The game will be terrible. The End.
It looks like "No Man's Oblivion", and with Emil behind its "creative" elements, it'll be bland and uninteresting and boring... and lore? Lore will be basically non-existent. Or, you and everyone else will have "AMNESIA!", and not know any history. Because, "Why write a compelling backstory, that no one's going to read?"...IN AN RPG!!!
*ahem*
So yeah, its gonna suck, because Emil sucks.
Starfields going to be a dumpster fire.
If that's the case, Bethesda could always turn thing around by marketing a badly draw cartoon, like CDPR.
@@Nemesis-222 Except Cyberpunk was actually good and not nearly as buggy as people let on. People seem to let it pass that every Bethesda title is busted not only on release but forever. At the very least, what problems effected some (key word: some, I had very little) has been fixed. Also, Edgerunners was done by Studio Trigger - one of the most popular studios in the industry.
People need to stop jerking off Bethesda. I used to love them too - stop giving them money for their greed and garbage.
@@Etherealizer - You're obviously having a laugh, "Cyberpunk not nearly as buggy as people let on", it was three months before I could even play it on my highend system. I had a i9-8 core 32 Gig. when this garbage was released. Yes, it was complete garbage. It's still buggy as hell, infact, it's a joke. Garbage physics, empty world, thrown together in a hurry, It's only redeeming feature is the characters, everything else was an afterthought, like the crafting lol.
@@Nemesis-222 People also just dismiss the fact about 100% of the RPG systems CDPR promised just weren't there and NEVER will be implemented.. People forgot you where supposed to be able to join Factions, each was said to have a storyline, NPCs where supposed to live daily lives, body augmentations where supposed to be do ANYTHING.. Clothing was supposed to be like armor with stat increases and decreases, the cops were supposed to be intuitive and change tactics... It's a bunch of stuff CDPR had promised but was never in the game.. Bethesdas NEVER done that with a game..
@@KTdaLibertian You're crazy. All I need to do to debunk that last line is to just say Radiant AI.
im gonna play it regardlessss, unless it's REALLLY bad
Even if its amazing you can still criticize it
Most likely, like most games these days, especially "Bethesda Games", Starfield will be a good game EVENTUALLY, after the community patched the majority of the bugs and implements some needed live improvement features!
Im sorry but none of these reasons are of the games own merit. This is all sort of bethesda copium
early gang lets gooo
If only people could just keep identity Politics out of modern games.
WTF is Body Type 1-3, Male and Female is all that's needed, and you'd think would be easier to make.
How does that have anything to do with politics 🤔
@@nocapsbb have you been living under a rock for the last 6 years?
I'm also very disappointed. I bet there are going to be story surprises too that will make you regret buying the whole game.
@@varmastiko2908 and some Saints Row levels of cringy dialog.
"Seee climate changed killed this planet"
and "Uhhh white people are so bad" or "look how bad capitisim is, even though its helped more people out of poverty than any other economy type"
@@housbous1096 idk but just being yourself isn't politics lol
Time too plan my space raider gang running the underground dads goody rings trade.
Yeah, I've seen starfield as it actually came out. Just become a minecraft youtuber, minecraft is an actually good game.
You bring up Cyberpunk.. as an example of an AAA disappointment.. on a video about Bethesda game.... dude..
Pre-ordering Bethesda game is a whatever. "Don't pre-order cause you are paying for unfinished product" is kinda hollow when it comes.... fucking beating a dead horse at this point..
Positive #1: that is not a plus anymore. Nor a bare minimum. Need to do much better than that.
Positive #2: Why didn't you just say "no online, it's offline"
Positive #3: Because Bethesda fans are the easiest to make happy? They eat anything with Bethesda logo on it? "But FO76" shut up and read one line up. I could go further, but the aforementioned horse really is quite far into decaying process. This is the point that I have the most issues here. You talk so much about a game they haven't made.. I think ever.
Positive #4: Eeehhh... whataboutism..
Positive #5: I already support you on Patreon
Positive #5 again: Sure, but no, and yes.. Reason why I support you is the mod content, because mods make FO4 playable in the first place. Now that the general standard for what is considered OK for games has gone way up, I can't see myself playing any Bethesda game without mods. Modders are the one that make these games enjoyable.
Positive #6: Fine. I'd go with superior WH40K.
Positive #7: No.. just no.. Procedural generation is... remember "radiant quests" from Skyrim and FO4?
Positive #8: Fine again. Pointless, doesn't add value, but fine.
Positive #9: Bare minimum. See P#3.
Positive #10: How is this positive? What reputation? ...... the horse is dead.... it's very dead... It will be broken, you know that.
"Hey, Voramon, why are you so negative?!" Because I have no faith in Bethesda. I have faith in modders. Reason why I'm subbed to this channel. To find some nice mods so that...... The horse is dead! Stop going on about it.. That's me talking to myself..