Atheists have obviously concluded that they know everything. This guy is talking about phenomenology of perception, Maurice Merleau-Ponty etc, but the French philosopher wasn't denying God, just talking about our perception of reality. I'm Muslim incidentally. Alhamdulilah...
Are you sure about that? QURAN 98.6 Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.
The atheist has been in Speakers Corner for many years and so far it seems like he may agree with Islam but he's on the "Undecided" side; uncertain about everything but certain on trying to figure it out (for some reason)
Believer's argument: God who is OMNISCIENT n ALMIGHTY creates the universe. Atheists laugh off the claim and suggested a better idea: Life starts from nothing which develops into something and creates wonders despite having no intelligence at all! This is possible! ".. that this planet came together through what one may describe as chance .." ... and it so happened that by chance everything can work together in perfect order! This is the logic atheists try to sell to believers!
If someone truly wants to be an atheist, then they shouldn't believe in existence. The fact that existence is here and the universe is in this way means that there is a creator (god)
@@Theo_Skeptomai Yes all atheist invite us to the same concept " that the universe popped out of nothing!" which doesn't make sense,all of you either are arrogant, experienced severe trauma in your lives , emotional or worship your own desires and so you refuse to believe in the Creator of the universe so you can cause mischief without feeling guilty.
He always does this. He’s just so uncertain and agnostic and it’s like he is playing philosophical improv and always saying “yes but” or “I agree, but.” He has found his way to get into and onto every different channel for Islamic dawah or Christianity and just dives into these mind games of uncertainly certain.
@@ottie8554 that is the definition of “too much philosophy”. He is there to keep exploring without any real direction. I met a few in my life of that type.
Things like Atheism or LGBT require artificial environmental elements to exist as concept or practice whereas if kids left alone in forest, they will be religious believing in super natural power and away from LGBT or athiesm which are just products of urban life mainly lately
I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. My position is that *_I have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._* And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that some god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument concluding there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating such a claim. 1. I personally have never observed a god. 2. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god. 3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity. 4. I have never been presented a valid logical argument that also employed sound premises that lead deductively to a conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality. 5. Of the many logical syllogisms I have encountered arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain either logical fallacies or false or unsubstantiated premises. 6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon. 7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._ 8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event. 9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity. 10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as falsifiable. ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any god. I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._* I welcome any cordial response. Peace.
I personally have never observed the sperm and the egg brainstorming together and make the blueprint for the human existence. Despite in their primitive state and without intelligence, they are able to create all the body systems required by human in order to live. They grow the body parts accordingly as they planned and make the differences between man and animals. Atheists think believing a Creator who is all-powerful and omniscient is not convincing enough compared to believing something with zero knowledge and is powerless but still be able to create the many wonders that we see today. I don't see the logic whereby the steel particles spontaneously work together to construct the Eiffel Tower!
@@mohammedmostapha5887 I am a truth seeker and not arrogant. So, do you think I am rationally justified in my position of atheism - to suspend any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented?
@@Theo_Skeptomai no your not cuz the Creator wouldn't leave us without guidance he has always sent messengers and supported them with proofs and miracles but before you tell me you saw non of those miracles let me tell you non of them claimed to have been sent to you expect one Muhammad ﷺ which means you need to investigate his claim.
@mohammedmostapha5887 I will take that as a "no". Are you then asserting that I ought to acknowledge the truth of _each and every_ claim I encounter regardless that there isn't any evidence presented that can substantiate its truth?
Life has more meaning to an atheist that any religion on earth. We live for this life. Whereas religions can't wait to die and be in their heaven. Muslims can't wait to get to their v1rg1ns in paradise and would d1e for it. We see it all the time.
Even as a Roman Catholic, I found this video very intriguing; thanks for uploading.
I love Paul's videos because they're calm, and the conversation is reciprocal.
I never knew Hugh Grant went to SC.
Atheists have obviously concluded that they know everything. This guy is talking about phenomenology of perception, Maurice Merleau-Ponty etc, but the French philosopher wasn't denying God, just talking about our perception of reality. I'm Muslim incidentally. Alhamdulilah...
Quote of the day:
"The purpose of religion is to control yourself, not to critisize others".
Are you sure about that?
QURAN 98.6
Indeed, they who disbelieved among the People of the Scripture and the polytheists will be in the fire of Hell, abiding eternally therein. Those are the worst of creatures.
The atheist has been in Speakers Corner for many years and so far it seems like he may agree with Islam but he's on the "Undecided" side; uncertain about everything but certain on trying to figure it out (for some reason)
Believer's argument: God who is OMNISCIENT n ALMIGHTY creates the universe.
Atheists laugh off the claim and suggested a better idea:
Life starts from nothing which develops into something and creates wonders despite having no intelligence at all! This is possible!
".. that this planet came together through what one may describe as chance .."
... and it so happened that by chance everything can work together in perfect order!
This is the logic atheists try to sell to believers!
If someone truly wants to be an atheist, then they shouldn't believe in existence. The fact that existence is here and the universe is in this way means that there is a creator (god)
Are you claiming this is what atheists, such as I, _actually_ believe?
@@Theo_Skeptomai Perhaps. If you have different view, make it known here.
@@Theo_Skeptomai Yes all atheist invite us to the same concept " that the universe popped out of nothing!" which doesn't make sense,all of you either are arrogant, experienced severe trauma in your lives , emotional or worship your own desires and so you refuse to believe in the Creator of the universe so you can cause mischief without feeling guilty.
Too much philosophy
Correction too much "
arrogance, worship of self, whims and desires"
@@mohammedmostapha5887 it’s not arrogance. Some people come to just discuss philosophy with no intention of seeking anything in particular.
He always does this. He’s just so uncertain and agnostic and it’s like he is playing philosophical improv and always saying “yes but” or “I agree, but.” He has found his way to get into and onto every different channel for Islamic dawah or Christianity and just dives into these mind games of uncertainly certain.
@@ottie8554 that is the definition of “too much philosophy”. He is there to keep exploring without any real direction. I met a few in my life of that type.
Things like Atheism or LGBT require artificial environmental elements to exist as concept or practice whereas if kids left alone in forest, they will be religious believing in super natural power and away from LGBT or athiesm which are just products of urban life mainly lately
WHAT?!? Are you willing to answer some straightforward questions concerning your ridiculous comment?
I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. My position is that *_I have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._*
And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that some god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument concluding there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating such a claim.
1. I personally have never observed a god.
2. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god.
3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity.
4. I have never been presented a valid logical argument that also employed sound premises that lead deductively to a conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality.
5. Of the many logical syllogisms I have encountered arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain either logical fallacies or false or unsubstantiated premises.
6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon.
7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._
8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event.
9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity.
10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as falsifiable.
ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any god.
I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._*
I welcome any cordial response. Peace.
I personally have never observed the sperm and the egg brainstorming together and make the blueprint for the human existence.
Despite in their primitive state and without intelligence, they are able to create all the body systems required by human in order to live.
They grow the body parts accordingly as they planned and make the differences between man and animals.
Atheists think believing a Creator who is all-powerful and omniscient is not convincing enough compared to believing something with zero knowledge and is powerless but still be able to create the many wonders that we see today.
I don't see the logic whereby the steel particles spontaneously work together to construct the Eiffel Tower!
May Allah ﷻ guide you to the Truth if you're a Truth seeker and not an arrogant human being.
@@mohammedmostapha5887 I am a truth seeker and not arrogant.
So, do you think I am rationally justified in my position of atheism - to suspend any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented?
@@Theo_Skeptomai
no your not cuz the Creator wouldn't leave us without guidance he has always sent messengers and supported them with proofs and miracles but before you tell me you saw non of those miracles let me tell you non of them claimed to have been sent to you expect one Muhammad ﷺ which means you need to investigate his claim.
@mohammedmostapha5887 I will take that as a "no". Are you then asserting that I ought to acknowledge the truth of _each and every_ claim I encounter regardless that there isn't any evidence presented that can substantiate its truth?
Howcome Mr.Paul is effortless and my atheist brother is struggling hard to express himself.
Why do YOU think?
"Life has no meaning or purpose " atheists in a nutshell 😂
Life has more meaning to an atheist that any religion on earth. We live for this life. Whereas religions can't wait to die and be in their heaven. Muslims can't wait to get to their v1rg1ns in paradise and would d1e for it. We see it all the time.
@@DaveZee823 quite the opposite atheists corrupote the world day and night since they don't believe in a judgment day.
Actually quite the opposite atheists have no fear of corruption if they can get away with it because they don't believe in a judgment day.
Is the atheist talking about Christianity?