Q.Why Taj Mahal is only in India? Ans- Because it was too heavy to carry it to Britain😂 But still the looted many precious gems from Taj Mahal They are professionals😂
@@jj591one petty thief stealing stuff from rich with so much money n security still mfs file a complaint in police station such a irony isn't it?🤣🤦 Are dumb or wt mf?🤣🤦
Mr. Tucker should see Madurai Meenakshi temple, Tiruvannamalai Gopuram, Murudeshwar temple, etc. They were built when the Brits were not wearing clothes.
@@Iam_Ray21Greeks, Romans, etruscans did do that. And Stonehenge and newgrange in ireland thousands of years older than temples in india. Not comparing, just saying.
@@user-mx4gg3hv8n what say?? Correct explain think- you have 100$ & someone take your money with out your permission & after you have no money they are come and help you
@paulbunyan6024?not sure about what? The ancientness of our civilizations? Let me tell you,while the anglo,salons etc were reaching the now British islands,India had already experienced IVC,Vedic civilizations, thousands of architecture,the great empires like Mauryan empire,Gupta etc.. Not to mention the rise and fall of ancient cultures like Buddhism,Jainism,Sanatana Dharma etc... Oh and let's not forget thousands of music,dance,great mythologies like Ramayan,Mahabharat written. Only thing was,unlike Chinese and British, or the arabs, we didn't have gun powder and cunning methods.
1 thing where india needs to be charged Is tht its a fairly divided country Specially hindu religion which is weirdly divided Both hindu muslim religion is a menace to them Something which they don't realise China reached the top
@@Calibre336 India contributed to 25% of world GDP. When british left, it was a poor third world country but now India is a larger economy than British anyways 😂😂
@@Calibre336 not all india is poor but this poverty exists because of their huge population that is not compatible with their current GDP which is over $3.7 trillion. Despite some poverty, India is still a potential superpower after China and EU
Lol what??🤣🤣 I guess by your logic scandanavia also developed cause of money stolen from England and Europe. It doesn't work like that ,read a history book.
As an Irish-Australian I’ll tell you one thing, britian did not ‘bring’ things to people; they brought stuff for *themselves* , not those who were indigenous to the lands
@@vatsal7640well, that was certainly a failed statement. The word itself has ‘Irish’ in it lol. And plus, to speak facts about Ireland, one does not need to be from Ireland. So, either way your comment didn’t need to be commented.
@@blueshoes5145 lol that's not wha I meant. Usually most of these Irish Americans or irish Australians have very little ancestry or connection to Ireland,yet they are still so proud to call themselves Irish. The best example is Biden, the guy has the most Anglo Saxon surname ever yet he still goes around calling himself Irish.
@@نظرياتديجيمونية LoL The Religion word is itself of latin origin In Indian Vedic & pre-vedic sanskrit literature there is no such thing as religion It is only latin following , Abrahamic countries that are religious . We are sanatan-dharmic people ( universal law abiding people ). India/Bharat is the holy land of seekers . They seek , they find , they realise , they Practice then preach . That's how Buddhism came bcoz Gautama was a seeker who left his kingdom to know the ultimate truth . In our dharma everything is believed & Practiced for a reason . Unlike Islam & Christianity where you question and debate one moment and get killed the next . And there is a difference between not understanding scientific traditions vs actual pegan stuff. You seem to mix the two .
She is factually incorrect. Countries like India were not third world shitholes, you can read about glorious Indian empires which at a time were centres of global trade. As per the former Arguement, beauty is a non quantifiable entity, I can say southern Indian temples show much more finesse than the mentioned building.
@@jj591What do you mean if that would be the case, pick your ass up and travel and you will see what's the case. Remnants are there and historians work is also there. Talking about small island conquering, that island came as traders and Indians were already in war for 800 years with Mughals. Your Island will go back to the hell hole again as it should have been without the money looted from colonies.
@@jj591 India back then was divided into many princely states and small kingdoms under the rule of the Mughal emperors who were Muslim. So already it was under small conflicts and the British exploited that. Used that against Indians. It's not like they came and fought wars and conquered. That's what you probably think happened but no it was not. They used Indians against each other based on religions and cultures because India is a uniquely diverse nation and they used that to manipulate and make the people fight each other. Thier policy was divide and rule. If you really believe India was a third world shit hole then come see Taj Mahal, Ajanta and Ellora Bhudist art caves, Forts and temples that are far older and built long before the US as a country even existed. The number Zero was first used by Indian mathematician to represent the value of nothing. The Indus valley civilisation is one of the oldest in the world. Tamil is the oldest language that is still being used today. You westerners just don't want to accept and admit it because you people are racists and have that white supremacy mentality thinking other people besides you can't do or achieve unbelievable feats. Keep denying all you want but we have already surpassed Britain's economy. Even the damn crown of England has Indian diamond in it. The Kohinoor diamond. Go to China and read some of their ancient histories where Chinese travellers back then came to India and read what they wrote about India back then. Before the Mughal invasion. They have records of their scholars and monks who kept journals and record of how great India was back then whe they travelled here.
That's why education is needed!! Search Indian civilization on google !!! Your entire countrys history look like a 1 to 2 pages history book when compared with history of indian civilization !! 🖕@@vatsal7640
@@vatsal7640 If so, than why do you question it? India is the only where surgery was invented. Mathematics was the basics in India. Our ancestors were so much technologically and literally advanced. They are the reason many of you study those formulas in math in the first place. It was civilized, just go see any ancient city, many of the remains are still there. And those buildings are much stronger and better than most buildings. Mohanjodaro for example, is another city situated in Pakistan of the indus valley. It was originally a part of India, the people were 5000 years older and they made drainage systems which are still functional even today. You call that uncivilized?
Atleast we didn’t burn widows alive mate. Atleast we don’t fuck animals. Atleast we don’t have the highest rape cases in the world. Atleast we don’t have cow shit everywhere
Juz after hearing stories about riches of India , where tonnes varieties of spices , varieties of clothes ,cotten ... What not ... Selling golds n diamonds in streets So thy determined to built Indian civilization🤬 and started voyages risking everything
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER When usa got civilised It wanted to civilise the whole world so they sent missionaries and companies to other countries abroad. Same logic Period
He was an explorer, going where nobody had ever been before. Of course he made mistakes. How was he to know that the land he reached was a new continent rather than India? P.S.- Although I will admit that he was pretty stupid to call the islands he discovered the West Indies, because if he were actually right and had reached the Indies as he thought, he would've ended up on the Eastern side of the Indies, so if he'd been right the West Indies would be East of the East Indies, which would be rather confusing! :-)
Imagine calling a country poor after looting from them and then saying just because a few number of buildings and left behind a railway system the acts they commited of murdering and racially discriminating people became just?
@@Hammerlikestobefunky What is your argument, just because they have British ancestry Britain is to blame? Are your grandparents to blame because of a crime you committed?
@@mamtasingh2703 That has got absolutely nothing to do with what I said. And how have I done anything wrong? What country are you from? I can guarantee your country has done some horrible things in the past.
The only Reason the British were able to take over India was because that they were able to divide and conquer, and if they couldn't do that, they would have certainly lost. *Edit:"Dividing and conquering" was meant in a Political sense, they sowed discord and Made the rulers and kings of the Political states reliant on them, becoming weak the states were easy to invade like the Marathas.*
India is the hell hole If you studied history you would know this video is bullshit no one Actually knows what they are talking about 🙄 Almost every country in the world had African slaves but people only mention The UK and the US The same about India Have done worse to their own people One contender for the title of "most invaded country" is India. India has been invaded by a wide variety of foreign powers throughout its history, including the Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and British. Some historians estimate that India has been invaded over 1,000 times.8 Sept 2014
Before the brits took over india the marthas has taken the contro of bharat and destroyed many mughal rulers then the great britain came and looted us i hoped that time the kings and and queen necer divided they wouldnt have taken the power so india is still a majority hindu country bcs of india and hindus more specifically maratha ruler not for britishers
Please don’t say Britishers introduced space exploration programs like ISRO and built institutions like IITs and AIIMS.We built it and became better and better only after you guys left.
@@jj591 Nobody in India even say that india built British empire but rather they meant today’s Britain is built by exploiting and stealing wealth from poor third world countries like India or Africa.
@@jj591British empire was literally nothing without India and Indians. We were literally your cash cow and your industrialisation was again literally built on money stolen from us. If it weren’t for India, you’d still be living like savages looking to steal something just to see another day.
It is important to note. The British could never have controlled us without the active aid and assistance of our own Indian royalty. The British Empire did not have the manpower to control India. It enlisted thousands of Indians who actively subjugated their fellow country men. It did same thing in Nigeria. I feel we let the role of many of Indian royalty slide in our discussion.
@@jacquelinepaul9731 that's actually true... There were only about 135000 British troops in India even during the peak of their empire. They pretty much controlled india using Indians (divide and rule, play one side over the other)
@@sakbhu001 There was no India, that's why. India as people know it today was a British invention, like Hinduism (which was just defined as non-Islamic/Buddhism Indian religious practices).
@@sakbhu001less than 60k British Troops actually at its height in the 1920’s. Plus 60000k families, administrative staff, engineers, plantation owners etc. 120k tops.
Americans and Australians are descended from Brits, there was no 'American' or 'Australian' before Britain came. Just undeveloped, technologically inferior tribes and small kingdoms... Kinda like India in fact :)
@@samsativa245What? you never would of survived a winter without those "inferior" tribes. You didn't came here like conquerors Vikings tried it and failed. You came here as refugees leaving because of religious percussion.
@@samsativa245india is an ancient civilization. The maths you use today numbers and zero originated in india .now decide whether it is soke uncivilized tribes from Australia European barbaric white hunters or some great ancient civilization.
@@samsativa245by the way there is nothing like British. They are Anglo sexons vikings Normans etc. Your British arse is ruled by normans who are vikings. Now a danish king Charles rules u😂 and indian Rishi is governing u lol
I’m just surprised that Americans are supporting Britain 😂 Edit: The last like 10 replies I’ve had on this have said along the lines of British People and American people are the same. Have these people been on the internet? Americans *hate* British people. What are these guys on?
@@vatsal7640 google: Based on 2020 American Community Survey estimates, 1,934,397 individuals identified as having British ancestry, while a further 25,213,619 identified as having English ancestry, 5,298,861 Scottish ancestry and 1,851,256 Welsh ancestry. The total of these groups, at 34,298,133, was 10.5% of the total population.
@Golemrock598Oh ho who said we did not accept that however soviet weopens way better thsn shitty western weopens and majority of them are being replaced, for example the Indian navy one of the largest in the world has mostly indeginous ships
Thieves only acknowledge themsevles as thieves when they help the poor. They dont acknowledge it when they do it to benefit themsevles and burn others. Instead the label degrade stereotype them and diminish their history and achievements Blacks(thugs and savages) Natives(savages) Brown people(uncivil, terrorists etc) Somehow white people decided they're the moral authority of the earth and every act they do is justified
@@jj591looting 45 trillion(it's in records)from a country...and converting a rich country into a third world country...I think it's pretty evident whose the thief
The British built so many things for India and it all downhill. It’s funny that the country prides itself on beauty and spiritualism and at the same time see people pooping in the middle of the street
7 wonders of the world and no British wonder 👏👏 And ofcourse the only Indian wonder amongst those 7 wasn't built by the British! Wake me up when they reach the moon or built something like the Statue of Unity
Lol reaching the moon is nothing when the west has rovers on mars. Also Britain has more inventors than india. Frank whittle who is british invented the jet engine so you everytime you on a plane you can thank him🤣
@@sethapayanaarapaya7344 who doesnt have sins? You think india is some perfect country? And why obsess over the past? Britain today has nothing to do with the past. It's a new day and its time to move on and get over it. Obsessing over this isnt going to make your life any better
@@emilioalvarez2940 ha ha😂, britain is just a boot licker of america and europe now and if i start mentioning India's inventions that british are using, it will be big list.
@@emilioalvarez2940 Britain has nothing to do with past??? 😂😂😂😂 yeah we can see that in the video 😂😂😂and we will not say anything just give us our 45 trillion back which is like 600 trillion right now that's it 😊
@@PeriwinkleEyesOfDivergencenahh,but the building doesnt look like what we would built. To be fair,it looks worse than any temple or even simplistic traditional kerala homes look much more elegant than that
@@Joshpoxhave you perhaps heard of the baths in the harappan civilization? I don't doubt that the brits' baths were old however my ancestors have lived right here since the harappan civilization and I can only thank god the brits didn't damage it.
Ajantha temples , southern Indian temples , ... R built 4 That 2Even before Brits become a nation , while they busy shifting in jungles and using stone Peebles to wipe their ass V built gigantic temples , schools teaching all sort subjects for students all around the world It's not fair to expect a wood head who juz a few gen ago upgraded from rocks Peebles to toilet paper and using spoons and forks instead of knifes to have know others history, may b he's shitting lies knowingly shameless
@@bastian9693 lamo ever heard of shidu valley civilization they had drainage system our ancestors had drainage system while you pigs where leaving in caves😂
India has produced many more beautiful buildings in it's history then some train station. These buildings are older as well and they are still standing. I'm not saying Britain is solely to blame for the sorry state India is in now, but understand India had industry and prosperity before colonialism. Albeit terribly bad distribution of wealth and corruption, but that's a problem everywhere.
That’s not how it works. If India looted 1 trillion dollars from China 200 years ago and China asks it back would you give it? No, so how can you expect Britain’s to do so. If India became a colonizer, they would have probably been the modern day equivalent after Japan or China.
Clarification. Britain did not do anything to elevate the conditions of women. The practise of Sati was banned by Raja Ram Mohan Roy. Father of Modern India. He fought for the rights of women. It was not Britain. They're taking credit for Indian Nationals now. Wow.
@@sanaira190 Didn't v killed Brits for killing rats which spread plague, which hurt religious emotions claim to b god's vechicel Brits stopped sati , Ram mohan can't do anything without rulling Brits support No denying Brits looted, exploited us , but v 2 r not without flaws
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER you speak of Sati. It was a practice that was limited to Rajasthan and north west. This started because of Islamic invasions. So did Purdah system. You speak of flaws within us. We were the only people which had the values of democracy since hundreds and thousands of years. (Panchayat system). These brits burnt their own women calling them witches. It was actually an argument in their head on whether they deserve voting rights or not. It was never even a thought in Indian mindset. You speak of the society which the largest gdp at that time. We would have evolved into a much better society and democracy regardless if britishers hadn't been here.
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER as for sati. Again as I said, result of invasion. And these bits cared nothing for women. They just like taking credit for one gold coin given at the cost of a child taken away. Makes so much sense. It was Raja Ram Mohan Roy who strived for ban against sati.
When Will Durant, a young American Historian and Philosopher stepped onto the shores of India for the first time in 1930, he wrote: ' The British conquest of India was the invasion and destruction of a high civilization by a trading company.' What honour was left to us when we had to take orders from a handful of traders who didn't knew how to wash their bottoms. They still don't know that.
@@syedsaba12314 everything, because you're painting the wrong picture Will Durant also praised the British rule in many occasions, and said it was better than previous Empires. You can read his book online
If you studied history you would know this video is bullshit no one Actually knows what they are talking about 🙄 Almost every country in the world had African slaves but people only mention The UK and the US The same about India Have done worse to their own people One contender for the title of "most invaded country" is India. India has been invaded by a wide variety of foreign powers throughout its history, including the Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and British. Some historians estimate that India has been invaded over 1,000 times.8 Sept 2014
@@winniepeg2020obviously,because you are on the side of internet which has the language of english predominantly. And former colonies also speak english,this leads to a situation where almost all the former colonies complaining about the colonisers,which were,in return,are the english/british. Maybe on the french side of the internet,you will hear west africans complaining about the colonialism of France and Belgium.
British: Removing old brutal hindu practices. At 13 April 1919: Open fires on unarmed people gathering and murders 2000-2500 ppl. One entry/exit confirms each and everyone dead. Sardar Udham singh later publicly shot General Dyer in UK parliament. British should simply shut their piehole and listen what their ancestors did. Atleast we are not determined to take revenge from current UK generations. Please be respectful of our patience.
The British stopped the Indians from killing widows. This is why Indian women still praise British people (or Muslims, who also opposed sati) whenever they can.
Excuse me but that’s way lesser than the sati practiced here. You’re throwing away a little girl. Yes 12 year old girls were married to 60 year old men here for wealth. The man dies. The society is cursing her, calling her names, she’s lost her grandpa of a husband and she also has kids who are still waiting for their mother to cocoon them in her warmth. And what did we do to the little girl? We chucked her in the fire with a dead man. SHE HAD A LIFE AHEAD OF HER! Indian women are still just forced into arranged marriages. When you say that india has less divorce rates than west, you’re forgetting that the woman wouldn’t even be given a chance to find true love if she divorces. They’re stuck and hence why they’re still there. If people were as open minded as the west, the divorce rates would be much higher
I'm an American myself,and I absolutely hate what they said,I don't really support colonialism,but I do like some Empires.Either way,The UK is the one that owns the reperations,not the colonies.And The British didn't help the colonies,sure they helped with infrastructure,but what else???After all, The British exploited India to the ground,and then people are wondering WHY modern India is poor???The British also did slavery a lot,they also destroyed Native cultures in modern day Canada.And don't even get me started with The British Museum,home to the museum with the most stolen artifacts and important objects.
The uk don’t owe anyone any reparations, that was ages ago and no British person alive has anything to do with it - people need to get over the past , this is ridiculous
Plus over 80% of what’s in the British museum would have been destroyed today if it weren’t for the British, at the time most of the artefacts were just seen as rubbish
@@wft15 let me get this way , imagine someone comes and takes away your valuables from your house cause you couldn't take care of it and they take it and keep it in their house , according to the law they will be held as theives since you didn't give them permission to use your valuables , it doesn't matter how you keep it .
@@RandomIndian019 the Brits weren't actually sh*tting in the streets but tossing it out their windows into the streets or into the same rivers they took water from
@@CurtisThomas-l9p that's even worse than shitting in the bushes , the also peed on monuments so the government had to install anti pee ridges which worked by directing the flow to the legs of the guy peeing on the building but it didn't stop them
She had great architecture equal in beauty to any in the world . She had great engineering work , merchants , businessmen ,bankers and financers. Not only the greatest shipbuilding nation but she had great commerce and trade by land and sea which extended to all known civilised countries. Such was the India which the British found when they came . Also In 1700 India and china were the richest countries in the world.
Ajantha temples , southern Indian temples , ... R built 4 That 2Even before Brits become a nation , while they busy shifting in jungles and using stone Peebles to wipe their ass V built gigantic temples , schools teaching all sort subjects for students all around the world It's not fair to expect a wood head who juz a few gen ago upgraded from rocks Peebles to toilet paper and using spoons and forks instead of knifes to have know others history, may b he's shitting lies knowingly shameless
Ajantha temples , southern Indian temples , ... R built 4 That 2Even before Brits become a nation , while they busy shifting in jungles and using stone Peebles to wipe their ass V built gigantic temples , schools teaching all sort subjects for students all around the world It's not fair to expect a wood head who juz a few gen ago upgraded from rocks Peebles to toilet paper and using spoons and forks instead of knifes to have know others history, may b he's shitting lies knowingly shameless
India was the richest nation on the earth and it was invaded more than 200 times in its history… because the foreign invaders were envious of its riches. Worlds largest structure Angkor wat temple was build by Indian Kings while westerners were nomadics. 😂
@@sirivennelasastry when has a country with 30% of global GDP been dominated so easily by a bunch of nomads in the whole of human history? I get that India was wealthy but: A) that was pre-industrialisation B) 99.99% of the population was still in abject poverty 200 years ago. Who cares if some Maharaja's got rich
@@nhoyle8609 1) Angkor Wat was built thousands of years ago. West was nomadic at that time. 2) India has always been rich and democratic for more than 5000 years ago. Its people never had hunger deaths until foreign rulers invaded and started looting. Climate , soil, rivers etc in most part of the country are the best for agriculture. One can live year long without the help of clothes (meaning temperatures are best for living) for the most part of the country. Europe, with its harsh weather, and attitude of invasion, always was forced to invent, such as locomotives, rail transport, guns, for just survival.
@@awaken3d as I said before, India is so rich and culturally developed with lots of food for everyone, unlike Europe where food was scarce. Europeans had to loot someone else, and living conditions were horrible and they had to invent weapons and machines to survive in harsh conditions. Read my posts above for more info. India’s power is in its culture and wisdom for more than 10,000 years. They are not powerful barbarians.
Absolutely true. Kala sahibs were there at that time and they still exist. A section of Indian elites were working hand in glove abetting the loot of their motherland.
this is like if a builder comes to your house unannounced and unwanted, starts building a wall or something, then steals your jewellery and makes YOU pay for the wall
@@rob12x56 We Have More Population Than Your Country But Still Our Economy and GDP is More Than Your Country After The Fact That Your Ancestors Looted Everything From us. So You Should Grow Up Kid !. 😂😂😂
@@rob12x56 A Stupid Excuse in the Form of a Reply. I was Talking About Our Devolepment , Despite The Fact Your Ancestors Looted Everything From us , We Still Made ourselves Economically and Politically Strong and You are Talking About Population Density , Seriously... ??? Dude I Think You Should Grow Up. 😂😂😂
Deindustrialization,increasing poverty rate, non white population growth,increase of homeless people this is just the beginning now they are crying for FTA
Our people, our money, our land, the buildings in India solely belong to India either its Taj Mahal or Chatrapati shivaji terminus but they come nowhere infront of our ancient architectures. Mark my words Britain will never surpass India now. Try your best and we will develop more and more to uphold our past glory. "The golden bird".
Lmao india hasn't surpassed the uk in most things . Wtf are you even talking about?? Your glory is completely imaginary, if you knew history you would know it
I’m not saying that those two tv personalities aren’t wrong. But it would have been great to see the person who put together this short respond with something other than insults. Makes the watcher think there is no fact based rebuttal to their statements.
I do not have time to respond to every comment. Check my other replies. Anyway, here is the one. It was a reply to another person, just copy-pasting as is: ------------- What points did these two racist idiots raise? Sati(widow burning), railroad, educational institutes, wonderful things Britain did to India, extracting resources/minerals, indoor plumbing, beautiful buildings, creating wealthy country out of third world hell hole. Let's take one by one. Sati(widow burning) - Do you know how many widows were burnt in India? Check the data. More women were burnt in Europe in the name of witch burning. During that time, condition of women were pathetic everywhere. And, it was not Britain that stopped it. They did not give a damn about it or any other social/religious maladies as long as their loot were continuing uninterrupted. It was our men like Rammohan Roy who made the British government ban it. Railroad - Britain built railroad for making the loot of Indian resources faster. Common people were so poor that only a small section could afford a rail journey. It was paid by Indian tax payer's money. British investors made fortune out of it. Per kilometer cost of building Indian railroad were few times than Canada, America, Australia. That's the amount British investors looted in the name of railroad building. Educational institutes - During the time of independence India's literacy rate was 13% and same figure of England was over 95%. This simple data proves my point. Only a scoundrel will say Britain educated India. It actually destroyed Indian educational institutes for first one hundred years. What they built later was needed to create elite class and a working class to serve in their government. Wonderful things Britain did to India - 15 to 30 million people died in famines during British period. Right after British left there was not a single famine. Some magic happened I guess or maybe that is the wonderful thing that Britain did, as per that hideous woman in the video. Extracting resources/minerals - Nothing was used for the development of India. All were shipped back to that island nation. India was Britain's largest importer of finished goods and at the same time largest exporter of raw material to Britain. While British people rejoiced on Indian loot, Indians languished. Indoor plumbing - Really? All the villages did not have toilets even few years back. 90% of Indians were living in poverty when Britain left. And, this creature is talking about indoor plumbing? By the way, Indians knew about indoor plumbing and sanitation 5000 years back during Indus Valley civilization. Check the archeological facts. Who is teaching whom? Beautiful buildings - Check any modern buildings in India. Just check Infosys buildings. Those are enough. Want to go back? Check any major temples of ancient India. And who said Taj Mahal was built by West Asians? It was 100% designed and built by Indians. It was influenced by Islamic architecture because the king of that period was a Muslim, not a foreigner like Victoria. Creating wealthy country out of third world hell hole - This is the best. One has to be f-ing racist b***ard to say this. India was world's richest country before Britain colonized it. Remember British East India Company was founded on 1600. It took more than 150 years to get control over the land. They came here because it was the richest. India had 25% of the world GDP before the British took control in 1757. When they left, India’s share was 2%. India was industrial powerhouse. It was number one in steel, ship building, garments, gems, agriculture. Britain destroyed each and every industry one by one by punitive taxes/tariffs, taking away resources/capital and definitely by violence. Entire Europe's industrialization was funded by loot from the colonies. India was the prime source. Today all colonies (except China) are still struggling with poverty, illiteracy, and lack of industrialization. Japan was not colonized, and look at their success in modern era. Most of those still reach out to their erstwhile colonizers or their institutions like IMF, World Bank for capital that was once stolen from them. And, neo-colonization has not stopped yet. Still the natural and human resources of Asia and Africa are exploited to its fullest in the name of free market capitalism. While someone in America enjoys morning coffee or after-dinner chocolate, some malnourished boy in Africa is forced to work 18 hours a day to get the cocoa beans harvested, processed and delivered to some American or European chocolate manufacturing corporation for a few dimes. This is modern day slavery. Read, for god’s sake. Think what will happen if these so-called first world countries stop getting manufactured goods starting from garments to laptops, and services from the third world countries. If they have to manufacture all those, prices will rise exponentially and you know what will happen? They will also become third world countries. So, have some respect for others and stop eulogizing the worst kind of crimes that happened and are still happening in the name of colonialism and crony capitalism.
Destroyed 30+ major Gurukul universities across India and imposed wastern education on us saying we built school is like a huge hypocrite statement they ever made
When tourists visits india i dont think their list would prioritize visiting Bombay rail station over taj mahal, and our magnificent temples whoes building processes are still a mystery to modern science.....this is prime example of Backlash of pretended half assed knowledge 😂
@@TheMan-cz5mu The British spread the industrial revolution's technology, infrastructure and engineering around the world. Railways, communications infrastructure and roads were built by the British, in British colonies.
@@bbrruuhhhhh19 Most of the schools, universities, roads, the railways, ports, the telegraph system, and the irrigation canals. The airports less so, as they were largely built post-independence. :-)
@@dipannath9319 No, the British said that if the practise was to continue, they will start hanging the people who do it. so the Indian lawmakers who answered to their British overlords did as they were told.
@@samsativa245 But who's idea was this? It was Ram Mohan Roy's. He fought against sati. General William Bentinck just passed the law because he was in power. Other Britishers did not care. We were second class citizens to them.
@@Vayu_arya lmao 🤣🤣🤣 Did indians navy ever fought two superpowers like France and spain as Horatio nelson did?? Did indian navy ever fought wars in US and south America??? Did india ever stop a powerful force like Spanish armada??? Don't make me laugh🤣🤣 The royal navy would easily decimate any indian kingdom even Hitler said that rohal navy was unbeatable.
@@jj591 before 17 th century china and india controlled over 50% of world's GDP,I am not talking about army,china and india have great history of internal wars,conflicts and battles,when we left wars kids started doing world wars🤣
This is also not factually correct. The East India company initially tolerated Sati. Sati was a practice that was initially relegated to elite Rajput clans and was opposed by the Mughals. Raja Ram Mohan Roy and later the British opposed the practice of Sati. 😅 Not surprising that both journalists are conservative political commentators, with Tucker Carlson being the foremost proponent of Trumpism. 😅 Read - We say stupid things to make a living.
@@JustBigdataindia was an agrarian society, it always has been one It wouldn't have industrialized. India's nominal GDP doubled under the British raj
As a Brit I would massively disagree with what these guys say, the British empire brought many things to India in the same way Rome brought many thing to Britain. They brought nice buildings but for their own people not the British, the story of Boudicca is enough evidence of that. The British were just the modern version for India, brought many things but destroyed many more
I like that you, in a very nice way, highlighted that Britain was also colonised (for almost 400 years) too…people seem to conveniently ignore this and just go with recency bias and perhaps another bias
I wish more people were like you.I don't really blame current Brits for anything and reparations from the taxes of present day Brits doesn't seem reasonable . Serious acknowledgement of crimes would be better . What actually bothers me is people who justify colonialism and think that the colonized nations prior to imperialists were inferior .
I just feel so anger for these ppl ...if they know the truth why speak such hideous words...and if they dont know the truth how disgusting of them to speak such atrocious words
Maturity is when we realize that if colonization did not come we would have become a developed nation faster as the wealth would not have been sucked out of the country.
My grandmother liked Britishers coz they built schools and colleges for girls and lower caste people also. They also made anti child marriage laws twice... I know they came for wealth but I can't deny that I can't imagine being a woman in India if they won't come.
Every country in middle age was feudalistic and biased against women, including Britain. Britain did not colonize China directly. Do you mean China is any less civilized today? Come on. If Britain did not come we would have been more wealthy and socially progressive today. Because of Britain we only had only 13% education rate in 1947 whereas Britain had over 90%. If we got education early, women empowerment would have come early too.
@@IndicVoices India was far behind Britain at the time of British colonisation, both in terms of technology as well as socially with womens rights etc. You didnt even have a navy strong enough to contest anything at sea, yet at the same time you say india was rich from a sea trade network that Britain stole from you. LOL
@@samsativa245 Please read Inglorious Empire by Tharoor and Anarchy by Dalrymple. British East India company was formed in 1600 AD was doing business with India since then. They took 157 years to get control over India. Try to understand why. What happened during 1700 to 1757 that made India weak. Talking about Navy? Indian ships were full of Arabian Sea. It is written by travellers at that time. Mughal army was stronger than multiple European empires together. It used to be said that Jagat Seth was richer than Bank of England. The anarchy of 50 years (post Aurangzeb) made the road for Britain
@@IndicVoices Weird how you're trying to imply that India doing trade with the East India Co. between 1600-1757 made India weaker. Surely opening a new trading network with the Europeans benefitted India at first. The Company gained a foothold when it was granted the rights to build factories there. It wasn't until after 1757, the Battle of Plassey, where India sided with the FRENCH EAST INDIA Co. and LOST that the British East India Co. began to take over and rule Indian territory. During the First Anglo-Mughal War (1686-1690) the Mughals actually DEFEATED the East Indian Co. It wasn't until Plassey in 1757, when Mir Jafar sided with the British instead of siding with the French that British East India company started to rule India and make it weaker. Learn your history properly.
@4791msj Murakh the exyonm of Sindhu was strictly in reference to the region that is coterminous 🇵🇰! As for the concept of state this is almost entirely an British construct though no doubt Mughals played an role!
@@rob12x56 DUDE COLUMBUS WENT TO FIND INDIA , he knew india existed you people had no civilization back then , we had our civilization , there was a reason why everyone wanted to find india
@@Love-wz4vg Dude Columbus is completely irrelevant here. And lol no civilisation?????😂🤣😂 Europe had the largest empires at that time . They had more powerful guns and ships Htf can you even say that ????
@@rob12x56 america is alone superpower now Who founded america? It was Columbus Why European looking for India when you had so much civilisation Before European and Muslims came India was richest and the same time spiritual dharmic civilisation of the world You're civilisation made India poor not rich
Britain did not create wealthy countries. Britain got wealthy from exploiting natural wealth and resources from their colonies. Name one emperor of that time that actually invested in their empire and were benevolent in their practices towards local populations. And they say they brought civilization, plumbing, roads…there was civilization already, and nobody asked them to come colonize and bring the trappings of their own homes just because they wanted that same luxury there. It wasn’t to benefit from the people.
I think we should be silent now and instead of replying by word ,let the people of the whole of India be ready for reply by action.👍 And then from the international stage let them ask ,where is our 45 trillion worth of wealth.
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater Egypt, Mesopotamia and Indus valley civilizations were the only three civilizations in the world thousands of years ago. During this time, europeans were living in caves 😂😂
@@KanuniSuleyman4857 You're absolutely right! And? The British Empire brought democracy, infrastructure and economic development to much of the globe, not just India or the Americas.
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater they brought peace and prosperity only to those areas who obeyed, accepted their cultural superiority and assimilated into their culture while those who wanted to keep their identity separate from those of European colonists, they didn't let them prosper. That's why countries like USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are known as Children of the British 😂😂
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater And also world was already familiar with civilzation way before colonial powers took over the world. Chinese, Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Hittites, Mitannis, Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Nubians, Aksumites, Phoenicians, Carthagians and Japanese were great civilizations who contributed much more than the Europeans in building bases of human civilization on earth
@@D402S lmao by that logic Pakistanis and indians are all same since they both look similar. You just straight up mixed religion, race and nationality. Well done!!
@@jj591nahh,indians aren't used to much accents. American and british accent actually sounds much similar if you aren't born in a place with one of the mentioned accents.
Wait what!!! Are my eyes working right!!! Sir, have you ever heard about the deindustrialization of India by the so called Raj? Did you ever hear about the textile and ship building industry that India had and how it was demolished by imposing 80% tariff and cutting off the thumbs of the workers? Do you have any idea how horrible the pictures were on Kolkata roads during great Bengal famine ? Dead bodies were scattered around the streets and no one was left to perform the funerals. Do you know how much they looted from India? And how rich India was before they arrived? Never heard of any country getting richer by being deindustrialized, looted, oppressed , killed, enslaved divided and demoralized.
" cutting off thumbs of weavers" That's a myth , literally given on wilepedia. And india wasn't wealthier than modern day. British India had higher per capita and gdp than mughal India
@@jj591 Good joke dawg! You brits didn't do anything to civilize us. When you people were still hunting and living in caves, we the Indians were already building empires, ancient Marvels in the form of temples, studying space & teaching foreign students in our ancient Universities about astronomy, metallurgy, philosophy, medicine, mathematics, engineering & influencing other countries like China, & many South East Asian countries. Don't talk nonsense without knowing anything.
@@bbrruuhhhhh19 If you compare the 1909 Indian Railways map to the current one, you will see that the majority of lines in existence today were obviously built by the British. Yes, there have been some new lines built since, but most of the vast original network was built by the British.
@@AdityaKumar-gn2wj great Britain lost more money in India then in any other colony. Most historians agree on this in modern day. And plz don't act as Britain was poor or weak before conquest of india
@@AdityaKumar-gn2wjactually, the British never stole 45 trillion as you claimed, the British was really rich before coming to India as they profited a huge amount on the Atlantic slave trade and had many colonies prior to that, I mean how do you even inflate the number and get an exact number for how much the British stole, it’s also inflated in dollars.
They left a Civilized India? Nah, before the British came and introduce education, Indians already got education, the Indians go to school sometimes under a tree, sometimes in a ground, bc sitting in one classroom and learning for 5 or 6 hrs a day feels like Jail
They Introduce Christianity, good i am an Indian-Christian but did they introduce Christiany like Jesus did, by love,Gospel? No, the British introduce a law in which says, " Anyone who converted to Christian faith, will have a right to own their ancestors land". Mahatma Gandhi say he like Jesus but he dont like the people that follow him.
They build railway tracks? From the same railway track they transport Indian Goods (Gold,Silver,coal,gem,diamond,iron,spices,etc) to their land. But not all British are theives, Some British officer who got insanely rich after coming to India, got called back to Britain, he appeared in court, they ask him how he got his money, and later he suicide
We were the most industrialized nation in the 18th century. Britain did not modernize us. They modernized themselves at the expense of us. Japan was not colonized. So, they moved up the ladder faster in the 20th century. The same goes for China. All the colonized nations struggled and are still struggling.
@@IndicVoices hmmm no that’s not correct. I find it strange how people use the word colonize these days. it’s in our dna to explore and find new land to prosper grow our families and loved ones. Only a liberal college idiot sees it as a bad thing. This is how ideas got spread back then this is how science and knowledge moved around the earth.
@@IndicVoices people want to demonize “white” countries that were far more advanced than they were at that time. But now all of them move to those countries because they cannot fit into the new world their leaders fail to make proper decisions for the people. Let’s blame it on people hundreds of years ago.
If you were the most industrialized nation how did you let a small island on the other side of the world take you over.? Y’all have thousands of years to build your civilization.
@@Justin-df9ev British colonised India, that doesn't mean India wouldn't have been a developed country without the British. India was doing pretty well before the British. India had the world's 1/4 GDP in the 17th century. So, yeah India would have been way better off without British.
@@rob12x56 India's population was not more than 10 million in 1600s. Besides, whole India wasn't unified as the Mughal Empire. Back then, India=Mughal Empire.
British Empire 🇬🇧 was the most advanced in the world with laws, infrastructure, parliamentary democracy, the BE also disbanded serfdom from the Moguls, the Indians were slaves to the Mugals 😮
Imagine looting 45 trillion dollars from us and saying that British developed India
Imagine believe Britain looted 45 trillion dollars when the entire British empire didn't even generate enough money to near a trillion dollar
@jackylynnDaddy and lap dogs stick together 😂
@@jj591Don’t have to imagine
they looted 149 million not 45 trillion the math was done by a old indian lady if u do the actual math it comes out around 149 million
@@HMStar10 like how India is dog to russia?? lol
Q.Why Taj Mahal is only in India?
Ans- Because it was too heavy to carry it to Britain😂
But still the looted many precious gems from Taj Mahal
They are professionals😂
Losing to a small island, then making excuses .
~ indian logic
Oh can you please tell me which island are you talking about?
@@cutiepie5998 what language are you typing in ??
@@jj591gibberish
@@jj591one petty thief stealing stuff from rich with so much money n security still mfs file a complaint in police station such a irony isn't it?🤣🤦 Are dumb or wt mf?🤣🤦
Mr. Tucker should see Madurai Meenakshi temple, Tiruvannamalai Gopuram, Murudeshwar temple, etc. They were built when the Brits were not wearing clothes.
exactly 😂
Well said...the anglo saxons were probably living in caves during that time
kailasha temple , rani ki vav temple , and many more
whose architecture is beyond the abilities of brit
@@na2co312 Exactly.
@@hindustani3551 Change your name to Porkistani3551.
Not a single Europeans can build a whole large detailed Temple out of A giant rock build thousands of years ago
Romans Ancient greeks
@@Polaris9171 sir you proved me wrong
@@Iam_Ray21Greeks, Romans, etruscans did do that.
And Stonehenge and newgrange in ireland thousands of years older than temples in india.
Not comparing, just saying.
H_ck they can't build it now😂
They can build essential railroads, docks, and hospitals. But at least India has temples, take pride in that.
Hahahaha. I don't even need to say anything negative about this lady. She just painted her own picture.
@@user-mx4gg3hv8n what say?? Correct explain think- you have 100$ & someone take your money with out your permission & after you have no money they are come and help you
@@user-mx4gg3hv8n unlike you ahahaha
@ANGLO-SAXON1 why cry the waetern world is on the decline
@paulbunyan6024?not sure about what? The ancientness of our civilizations?
Let me tell you,while the anglo,salons etc were reaching the now British islands,India had already experienced IVC,Vedic civilizations, thousands of architecture,the great empires like Mauryan empire,Gupta etc..
Not to mention the rise and fall of ancient cultures like Buddhism,Jainism,Sanatana Dharma etc...
Oh and let's not forget thousands of music,dance,great mythologies like Ramayan,Mahabharat written.
Only thing was,unlike Chinese and British, or the arabs, we didn't have gun powder and cunning methods.
1 thing where india needs to be charged
Is tht its a fairly divided country
Specially hindu religion which is weirdly divided
Both hindu muslim religion is a menace to them
Something which they don't realise
China reached the top
As a muslim, you need to read about India's past and its civilization. No one on earth can argue about India's glory
Poverty
@@Calibre336 India contributed to 25% of world GDP. When british left, it was a poor third world country but now India is a larger economy than British anyways 😂😂
@@Calibre336 China will modernise western countries who are in a state of decline now 😂😂
@@KanuniSuleyman4857 then wtf its so poor? if it has more gdp than british? make no sense.
@@Calibre336 not all india is poor but this poverty exists because of their huge population that is not compatible with their current GDP which is over $3.7 trillion. Despite some poverty, India is still a potential superpower after China and EU
Britisher developed their own country from our money..How shameless they are
Lol what??🤣🤣
I guess by your logic scandanavia also developed cause of money stolen from England and Europe.
It doesn't work like that ,read a history book.
@@jj591fun fact they did actually developed there country
@@Nihal.kr. who??
@@jj591 the Brits off cource look how developed they are
@@Nihal.kr. they are not as developed as other European countries .
And if they were then it would have nothing to do with india
As an Irish-Australian I’ll tell you one thing, britian did not ‘bring’ things to people; they brought stuff for *themselves* , not those who were indigenous to the lands
@@sparkysubwoofer if someone says he's Irish American or irish Australian, then it definitely means he isn't one.
@@vatsal7640well, that was certainly a failed statement. The word itself has ‘Irish’ in it lol.
And plus, to speak facts about Ireland, one does not need to be from Ireland. So, either way your comment didn’t need to be commented.
@@blueshoes5145 lol that's not wha I meant.
Usually most of these Irish Americans or irish Australians have very little ancestry or connection to Ireland,yet they are still so proud to call themselves Irish.
The best example is Biden, the guy has the most Anglo Saxon surname ever yet he still goes around calling himself Irish.
Spuds to bogs.
Irish-Australian? Is that more or less meaningless than an Irish-American?
*We have temples older than Christianity😂😂😂!*
Chrisitsnity 2000 yr old .
Hinduism 6000 yr old
@@نظرياتديجيمونية
LoL
The Religion word is itself of latin origin
In Indian Vedic & pre-vedic sanskrit literature there is no such thing as religion
It is only latin following , Abrahamic countries that are religious .
We are sanatan-dharmic people ( universal law abiding people ).
India/Bharat is the holy land of seekers . They seek , they find , they realise , they Practice then preach . That's how Buddhism came bcoz Gautama was a seeker who left his kingdom to know the ultimate truth .
In our dharma everything is believed & Practiced for a reason .
Unlike Islam & Christianity where you question and debate one moment and get killed the next .
And there is a difference between not understanding scientific traditions vs actual pegan stuff.
You seem to mix the two .
@@onidoremc9490Hinduism is more than 20000 years old. Guess what it’s not one religion
@@onidoremc9490 Christianity is much older than 2000 years old
@@giadagiuggiola0272prove it first
She is factually incorrect. Countries like India were not third world shitholes, you can read about glorious Indian empires which at a time were centres of global trade. As per the former Arguement, beauty is a non quantifiable entity, I can say southern Indian temples show much more finesse than the mentioned building.
That's why if there is a competition of the world's dumbest people, people like her and Tucker Carlson will win gold medals.
@@IndicVoices
Yes true! 😂😂
Well if that's the case then India wouldn't have been conquered by a small island.
@@jj591What do you mean if that would be the case, pick your ass up and travel and you will see what's the case. Remnants are there and historians work is also there. Talking about small island conquering, that island came as traders and Indians were already in war for 800 years with Mughals. Your Island will go back to the hell hole again as it should have been without the money looted from colonies.
@@jj591 India back then was divided into many princely states and small kingdoms under the rule of the Mughal emperors who were Muslim. So already it was under small conflicts and the British exploited that. Used that against Indians. It's not like they came and fought wars and conquered. That's what you probably think happened but no it was not. They used Indians against each other based on religions and cultures because India is a uniquely diverse nation and they used that to manipulate and make the people fight each other. Thier policy was divide and rule. If you really believe India was a third world shit hole then come see Taj Mahal, Ajanta and Ellora Bhudist art caves, Forts and temples that are far older and built long before the US as a country even existed. The number Zero was first used by Indian mathematician to represent the value of nothing. The Indus valley civilisation is one of the oldest in the world. Tamil is the oldest language that is still being used today. You westerners just don't want to accept and admit it because you people are racists and have that white supremacy mentality thinking other people besides you can't do or achieve unbelievable feats. Keep denying all you want but we have already surpassed Britain's economy. Even the damn crown of England has Indian diamond in it. The Kohinoor diamond. Go to China and read some of their ancient histories where Chinese travellers back then came to India and read what they wrote about India back then. Before the Mughal invasion. They have records of their scholars and monks who kept journals and record of how great India was back then whe they travelled here.
Are they forgetting that America is also a former British colony?
Yeah but the ancestors of them were probably British or nearby
Europeans@@bfcclarets4694
Carlson (Karlsson) has Scandinavian ancestral roots, Coulter German heritage. The common denominators are European and white.
That's why it's well developed and successful lol
@@samsativa245 lol only a small part of America was under British empire
A country that became civilised only 300 years back calls a civilisation 4000 years old as being "uncivilized". The best joke in the world😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lmao what makes you think india was civilised 4000 years ago????
Bollywood films??
@@vatsal7640Historical sources? Read history my guy
That's why education is needed!! Search Indian civilization on google !!! Your entire countrys history look like a 1 to 2 pages history book when compared with history of indian civilization !! 🖕@@vatsal7640
@@nehagangrade6306 I have.
@@vatsal7640 If so, than why do you question it? India is the only where surgery was invented. Mathematics was the basics in India. Our ancestors were so much technologically and literally advanced. They are the reason many of you study those formulas in math in the first place. It was civilized, just go see any ancient city, many of the remains are still there. And those buildings are much stronger and better than most buildings. Mohanjodaro for example, is another city situated in Pakistan of the indus valley. It was originally a part of India, the people were 5000 years older and they made drainage systems which are still functional even today. You call that uncivilized?
Bro is proud that his ancestors were sophisticated thieves
And murdrrers...and r4pists
I am Pakistani and even I am outraged at their hypocrisy
Atleast we didn’t burn widows alive mate. Atleast we don’t fuck animals. Atleast we don’t have the highest rape cases in the world. Atleast we don’t have cow shit everywhere
@@AbdulSoomro-kj5ltPakistan was apart of India. It means you as well
@@sib1930 well same race so
The thousand years old harrapan civilization and south indian architectures are laughing in a corner.
@tanish
And Mohenjo Daro.
Keep crying
@@Ankit-d9f4u dont cry when you dont have words
Then why was Columbus the maniac looking for India? under whose orders? And why didn't the man know how to navigate the seas?
Juz after hearing stories about riches of India , where tonnes varieties of spices , varieties of clothes ,cotten ...
What not ...
Selling golds n diamonds in streets
So thy determined to built Indian civilization🤬 and started voyages risking everything
Columbus was an Italian who was secretly Jewish who sailed for Spain.
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER
When usa got civilised
It wanted to civilise the whole world so they sent missionaries and companies to other countries abroad.
Same logic
Period
@@jacksonhodge4638
And Jesus was a secret devotee of gautam buddha who spread Buddhist knowledge in the west. .
Lol
He was an explorer, going where nobody had ever been before. Of course he made mistakes. How was he to know that the land he reached was a new continent rather than India?
P.S.- Although I will admit that he was pretty stupid to call the islands he discovered the West Indies, because if he were actually right and had reached the Indies as he thought, he would've ended up on the Eastern side of the Indies, so if he'd been right the West Indies would be East of the East Indies, which would be rather confusing! :-)
Someone please educate Tucker Carlson & Ann Coulter they need to take a trip to India 🇮🇳
True but these jokers doesn't wanna see britain rule negative impact in India
Educate I don't know but please they should be banned to enter India. Blacklist them for Visa request and ask for a trial !
@@missnarayani8948 in similar way Britain should Black list people like Shashi Tharoor lol
Nobody wants to visit India, have you seen India lately 😢
Imagine calling a country poor after looting from them and then saying just because a few number of buildings and left behind a railway system the acts they commited of murdering and racially discriminating people became just?
Even Brits aren't that dumb to say that. Obviously they are Americans😂
@ZestyTacos79 Their ancestors were also Brits technically og Americans have been mostly killed
@@Hammerlikestobefunky What is your argument, just because they have British ancestry Britain is to blame?
Are your grandparents to blame because of a crime you committed?
@@alpheendominationno
But you have no right to lecture others when you have done something wrong
@@mamtasingh2703 That has got absolutely nothing to do with what I said. And how have I done anything wrong?
What country are you from? I can guarantee your country has done some horrible things in the past.
The only Reason the British were able to take over India was because that they were able to divide and conquer, and if they couldn't do that, they would have certainly lost.
*Edit:"Dividing and conquering" was meant in a Political sense, they sowed discord and Made the rulers and kings of the Political states reliant on them, becoming weak the states were easy to invade like the Marathas.*
When was India ONE country that geographically resembles contemporary India?
@@doogleticker5183 what do you mean by that?
@@doogleticker5183Mughal empire?
India has always been an easily conquered nation. Just look at its history. Why do you think Indians bowed to Muslims?
@@John-wg9mb Didn't cover all of modern India. India and Hinduism are British inventions.
I think she forgot to mention that these railway tracks were built in India to transport our wealth to their hell hole.
Truee
Exactly.
The hell hole loads of Indians move to every year?
India is the hell hole
If you studied history you would know this video is bullshit
no one
Actually knows what they are talking about 🙄
Almost every country in the world had African slaves but people only mention
The UK and the US
The same about India
Have done worse to their own people
One contender for the title of "most invaded country" is India. India has been invaded by a wide variety of foreign powers throughout its history, including the Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and British. Some historians estimate that India has been invaded over 1,000 times.8 Sept 2014
So don't use them
The truth hurts, without the British India would be 93 separate countries ruled by a Muslim Caliphate.
Educate yourself kid... Most of India was under Maratha empire which had nothing to do with caliphate...
Before the brits took over india the marthas has taken the contro of bharat and destroyed many mughal rulers then the great britain came and looted us i hoped that time the kings and and queen necer divided they wouldnt have taken the power so india is still a majority hindu country bcs of india and hindus more specifically maratha ruler not for britishers
Please don’t say Britishers introduced space exploration programs like ISRO and built institutions like IITs and AIIMS.We built it and became better and better only after you guys left.
Then please also don't make stupid comments like india made British empire or Indians won world war two
@@jj591 who said that ?
@@PrahaladGantayat a lot of Indians say that. You just have to look up the internet
@@jj591 Nobody in India even say that india built British empire but rather they meant today’s Britain is built by exploiting and stealing wealth from poor third world countries like India or Africa.
@@jj591British empire was literally nothing without India and Indians. We were literally your cash cow and your industrialisation was again literally built on money stolen from us. If it weren’t for India, you’d still be living like savages looking to steal something just to see another day.
These 2 journalists are the product of Christian Madarsas😊
More like white supremacy because African and Latin Americans are also Christians but they never advocated colonisim
*Christian Asharam
@@Roman-yv3yeAllah ki maa ka bhosda
@@Roman-yv3ye you understood his prase or not
lol it’s called brutal honesty
It is important to note. The British could never have controlled us without the active aid and assistance of our own Indian royalty. The British Empire did not have the manpower to control India. It enlisted thousands of Indians who actively subjugated their fellow country men.
It did same thing in Nigeria.
I feel we let the role of many of Indian royalty slide in our discussion.
Why would Indian Royalty have done that please,doesn't really add up...interesting
@@jacquelinepaul9731 that's actually true... There were only about 135000 British troops in India even during the peak of their empire. They pretty much controlled india using Indians (divide and rule, play one side over the other)
@@sakbhu001 There was no India, that's why. India as people know it today was a British invention, like Hinduism (which was just defined as non-Islamic/Buddhism Indian religious practices).
@@Myndir actually, I'm talking about British India..
@@sakbhu001less than 60k British Troops actually at its height in the 1920’s. Plus 60000k families, administrative staff, engineers, plantation owners etc. 120k tops.
British laughing about India's condition is like~
" Rapist laughing at the victim "
Americans and Australians being colonized, couldn't save their people and culture lectures India about civilization.. 😂
Americans and Australians are descended from Brits, there was no 'American' or 'Australian' before Britain came. Just undeveloped, technologically inferior tribes and small kingdoms... Kinda like India in fact :)
Indians couldn't defend themselves against muslims and Europeans.
So why the hell are you laughing at others ????
@@samsativa245What? you never would of survived a winter without those "inferior" tribes. You didn't came here like conquerors Vikings tried it and failed. You came here as refugees leaving because of religious percussion.
@@samsativa245india is an ancient civilization. The maths you use today numbers and zero originated in india .now decide whether it is soke uncivilized tribes from Australia European barbaric white hunters or some great ancient civilization.
@@samsativa245by the way there is nothing like British. They are Anglo sexons vikings Normans etc. Your British arse is ruled by normans who are vikings. Now a danish king Charles rules u😂 and indian Rishi is governing u lol
Let's just work hard and make sure we replay these videos to our future generations
Yes.🙏
Facts
this
Totally .
Yeah
I’m just surprised that Americans are supporting Britain 😂
Edit: The last like 10 replies I’ve had on this have said along the lines of British People and American people are the same. Have these people been on the internet? Americans *hate* British people. What are these guys on?
I mean they are descendants of us and our biggest allies, despite the shit talking on the internet.
@@_Movieographyamericans are 10% british,rest are other europeans and new migrants
@@kalaasmna9116 not true.
The largest ethnicity of Americans is from the British Isles, then the Germans, Italians , Africans etc
@@vatsal7640 google:
Based on 2020 American Community Survey estimates, 1,934,397 individuals identified as having British ancestry, while a further 25,213,619 identified as having English ancestry, 5,298,861 Scottish ancestry and 1,851,256 Welsh ancestry. The total of these groups, at 34,298,133, was 10.5% of the total population.
@@_Movieography, also your former colony
India had 25% of world economics in the 18th century and India is really cool
😂 lmao these coping comments 💀😭🙏
@@TyroneTheinfamousIMPREGNATOR you ain’t cool lil bro imagine spamming emojis
@@Sportsguy73646 and????
Do you even know why india had that much percentage of GDP ???
@@rob12x56 no I do t
@@Sportsguy73646 which is why you should keep your mouth shut
Thief never accept that he is thief😂
Enslavers never say that they are enslavers. There is no legal slavery in India, because the Brits made slavery illegal.
@Golemrock598Oh ho who said we did not accept that however soviet weopens way better thsn shitty western weopens and majority of them are being replaced, for example the Indian navy one of the largest in the world has mostly indeginous ships
Thieves only acknowledge themsevles as thieves when they help the poor.
They dont acknowledge it when they do it to benefit themsevles and burn others.
Instead the label degrade stereotype them and diminish their history and achievements
Blacks(thugs and savages)
Natives(savages)
Brown people(uncivil, terrorists etc)
Somehow white people decided they're the moral authority of the earth and every act they do is justified
Oh so.. speaking the truth means you're a thief now????🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lmao RIP logic
@@jj591looting 45 trillion(it's in records)from a country...and converting a rich country into a third world country...I think it's pretty evident whose the thief
Now send this to Dr. Shashi Tharoor and let's see what he has to say. I am sure these not-so-educated people would get their answer
Shashi tharoor?? That criminal?
@@vatsal7640he debates good on international platform
Send shashi tharoor to some actual historian
@@Sandrocottus_18 nah, the same guy who glorifies mughals but criticize British??
He is a hypocrite
@@vatsal7640listen guy has some amazing knowledge the thing is he is under congress party so there's a limited things he can do otherwise he is best
Actually when the Brits left India we had flying cars and they introduced artificial intelligence 💀
Good taunt😂
@@THE_MATHEMATICAL it is not taunt it is dark reality
@@sarvariish how ????
@AstroHaenzie-zv3rc you can watch movie-hawaijada and you will get to know in detail what actually happened
Andhbhakt spotted
The British built so many things for India and it all downhill. It’s funny that the country prides itself on beauty and spiritualism and at the same time see people pooping in the middle of the street
Do you smoke weeds? What gives you an idea that India was in a better position during the British period than it is today?
7 wonders of the world and no British wonder 👏👏
And ofcourse the only Indian wonder amongst those 7 wasn't built by the British!
Wake me up when they reach the moon or built something like the Statue of Unity
Lol reaching the moon is nothing when the west has rovers on mars. Also Britain has more inventors than india. Frank whittle who is british invented the jet engine so you everytime you on a plane you can thank him🤣
@@emilioalvarez2940you still not realising the sins done by brits.go and watch the sins that stacked in the London museum
@@sethapayanaarapaya7344 who doesnt have sins? You think india is some perfect country? And why obsess over the past? Britain today has nothing to do with the past. It's a new day and its time to move on and get over it. Obsessing over this isnt going to make your life any better
@@emilioalvarez2940 ha ha😂, britain is just a boot licker of america and europe now and if i start mentioning India's inventions that british are using, it will be big list.
@@emilioalvarez2940 Britain has nothing to do with past??? 😂😂😂😂 yeah we can see that in the video 😂😂😂and we will not say anything just give us our 45 trillion back which is like 600 trillion right now that's it 😊
Britishers taking credit for
Raja Ram Mohan Roy?😂🤣
Raja ram mohan roy was inspired by british 🤭🤭🤭🤭
@@aryankhan3619You mean inspired by Indians?
@@PeriwinkleEyesOfDivergence raja ram mohan roy was inspired by british
@@aryankhan3619 nah
@@PeriwinkleEyesOfDivergencenahh,but the building doesnt look like what we would built.
To be fair,it looks worse than any temple or even simplistic traditional kerala homes look much more elegant than that
They just jealous that they be bankrupt and Bharat is growing. Keep crying 😂
Yet half of you dont have toilets and worship cows🤣 keep crying over a past you never lived.
@@emilioalvarez2940 making fun of us won't do anything, you actually need to have an argument
@@emilioalvarez2940 how about you actually give an argument instead of just mindless stereotypes
@@CheaplyAnimatedLenin ok then why don't you give back India the 45 trillian dollars
@@joe_mama9842 because im not Britain
India had indoor plumbing before the British even knew what 'taking a bath' means
That seems unlikely as England has some of the oldest baths in the world.
@@Joshpoxhave you perhaps heard of the baths in the harappan civilization? I don't doubt that the brits' baths were old however my ancestors have lived right here since the harappan civilization and I can only thank god the brits didn't damage it.
That’s why u guys still shit in the street lol
@@gorillafacewastaken source: trust me bro coming
@@kk7420 why would they damage it??? It was discovere by a British explorer lol
I feel so bad for these Britishers that they have to be so desperate to give answers for their deeds.
Actually these two were not British. They are Americans.
They are not British try again
They're americans you pendejo
@@IndicVoiceswell for being Americans they sure are big bootlockers
@@nikhilhembrom8952 like how indians are for russians?
Tell me you’re racist without stating you’re a racist
The ain't racist. They are dumb.
Lack of historical knowledge made them say this.
Meanwhile the ancient temples in india laughing 😶🤦♂️
Ajantha temples , southern Indian temples , ... R built 4
That 2Even before Brits become a nation , while they busy shifting in jungles and using stone Peebles to wipe their ass
V built gigantic temples , schools teaching all sort subjects for students all around the world
It's not fair to expect a wood head who juz a few gen ago upgraded from rocks Peebles to toilet paper and using spoons and forks instead of knifes to have know others history, may b he's shitting lies knowingly shameless
Meanwhile Stonehenge laughs even harder
@8%2F-wuw%2Cymuvu%60e%2Ccmm-cjalngl-UAYGF%3AsuKsP%3BwQ2NBuVkr%3BGC beautiful architecture or a pile of stones? Hmm...
Why do you guys only now have proper plumbing?
@@bastian9693 lamo ever heard of shidu valley civilization they had drainage system our ancestors had drainage system while you pigs where leaving in caves😂
India has produced many more beautiful buildings in it's history then some train station.
These buildings are older as well and they are still standing.
I'm not saying Britain is solely to blame for the sorry state India is in now, but understand India had industry and prosperity before colonialism.
Albeit terribly bad distribution of wealth and corruption, but that's a problem everywhere.
Give our $45 trillion dollars 🤬🤬🤬
That’s not how it works. If India looted 1 trillion dollars from China 200 years ago and China asks it back would you give it? No, so how can you expect Britain’s to do so. If India became a colonizer, they would have probably been the modern day equivalent after Japan or China.
Womp womp 💀
Along with interest..
@@a_life_of_aviation which language are you speaking 🗣️🤔😂😂😂
@@Unrevaling_Bharat Bahasa Inggris, bahasa terbaik di dunia.
Clarification.
Britain did not do anything to elevate the conditions of women. The practise of Sati was banned by Raja Ram Mohan Roy. Father of Modern India. He fought for the rights of women. It was not Britain. They're taking credit for Indian Nationals now. Wow.
Lie
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER fact!
@@sanaira190
Didn't v killed Brits for killing rats which spread plague, which hurt religious emotions claim to b god's vechicel
Brits stopped sati , Ram mohan can't do anything without rulling Brits support
No denying Brits looted, exploited us , but v 2 r not without flaws
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER you speak of Sati. It was a practice that was limited to Rajasthan and north west. This started because of Islamic invasions. So did Purdah system.
You speak of flaws within us. We were the only people which had the values of democracy since hundreds and thousands of years. (Panchayat system).
These brits burnt their own women calling them witches. It was actually an argument in their head on whether they deserve voting rights or not. It was never even a thought in Indian mindset. You speak of the society which the largest gdp at that time. We would have evolved into a much better society and democracy regardless if britishers hadn't been here.
@@_-_-_-TRESPASSER as for sati. Again as I said, result of invasion. And these bits cared nothing for women. They just like taking credit for one gold coin given at the cost of a child taken away. Makes so much sense. It was Raja Ram Mohan Roy who strived for ban against sati.
The audacity 💀
When Will Durant, a young American Historian and Philosopher stepped onto the shores of India for the first time in 1930, he wrote: ' The British conquest of India was the invasion and destruction of a high civilization by a trading company.'
What honour was left to us when we had to take orders from a handful of traders who didn't knew how to wash their bottoms. They still don't know that.
@@syedsaba12314 will Durant also mentioned that the Mughals and muslim conquest of india was the bloodiest in the world history.
@@vatsal7640true 😊
@@vatsal7640Lol lollllllll
@@vatsal7640 and what does it has to do in the context of this video?
@@syedsaba12314 everything, because you're painting the wrong picture
Will Durant also praised the British rule in many occasions, and said it was better than previous Empires.
You can read his book online
No one can lie better than Britishers and westerners
If you studied history you would know this video is bullshit
no one
Actually knows what they are talking about 🙄
Almost every country in the world had African slaves but people only mention
The UK and the US
The same about India
Have done worse to their own people
One contender for the title of "most invaded country" is India. India has been invaded by a wide variety of foreign powers throughout its history, including the Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and British. Some historians estimate that India has been invaded over 1,000 times.8 Sept 2014
Will Muslims are allowed to lie to strengthen Islam
@@winniepeg2020 British empire was lead by Satan himself. Ottomans where similar to the British and there whole existence was a looting operation.
@@winniepeg2020obviously,because you are on the side of internet which has the language of english predominantly.
And former colonies also speak english,this leads to a situation where almost all the former colonies complaining about the colonisers,which were,in return,are the english/british.
Maybe on the french side of the internet,you will hear west africans complaining about the colonialism of France and Belgium.
Indians actually believe that india existed before 1947. 😂
British: Removing old brutal hindu practices.
At 13 April 1919: Open fires on unarmed people gathering and murders 2000-2500 ppl. One entry/exit confirms each and everyone dead. Sardar Udham singh later publicly shot General Dyer in UK parliament. British should simply shut their piehole and listen what their ancestors did. Atleast we are not determined to take revenge from current UK generations. Please be respectful of our patience.
That's fine, just stay out of our country
You married and mutilated children
The British stopped the Indians from killing widows. This is why Indian women still praise British people (or Muslims, who also opposed sati) whenever they can.
Excuse me but that’s way lesser than the sati practiced here. You’re throwing away a little girl. Yes 12 year old girls were married to 60 year old men here for wealth. The man dies. The society is cursing her, calling her names, she’s lost her grandpa of a husband and she also has kids who are still waiting for their mother to cocoon them in her warmth. And what did we do to the little girl? We chucked her in the fire with a dead man. SHE HAD A LIFE AHEAD OF HER!
Indian women are still just forced into arranged marriages. When you say that india has less divorce rates than west, you’re forgetting that the woman wouldn’t even be given a chance to find true love if she divorces. They’re stuck and hence why they’re still there. If people were as open minded as the west, the divorce rates would be much higher
@@Myndirthe man who ban sati pratha was raja ram mohan roy not British lol😂😂
I'm an American myself,and I absolutely hate what they said,I don't really support colonialism,but I do like some Empires.Either way,The UK is the one that owns the reperations,not the colonies.And The British didn't help the colonies,sure they helped with infrastructure,but what else???After all, The British exploited India to the ground,and then people are wondering WHY modern India is poor???The British also did slavery a lot,they also destroyed Native cultures in modern day Canada.And don't even get me started with The British Museum,home to the museum with the most stolen artifacts and important objects.
The uk don’t owe anyone any reparations, that was ages ago and no British person alive has anything to do with it - people need to get over the past , this is ridiculous
Plus over 80% of what’s in the British museum would have been destroyed today if it weren’t for the British, at the time most of the artefacts were just seen as rubbish
@@wft15 doesn't matter it's respective culture's praticioner choice to keep or not keep their respective valuables , British have no right over them .
@@PrahaladGantayat if the British didn’t have them they wouldn’t exist. I think they look after it, they should keep it
@@wft15 let me get this way , imagine someone comes and takes away your valuables from your house cause you couldn't take care of it and they take it and keep it in their house , according to the law they will be held as theives since you didn't give them permission to use your valuables , it doesn't matter how you keep it .
India had civilization long before England 😅
@@CurtisThomas-l9p when they were the ones shitting on streets and dying of dysentery 😂😂😂😂
@@RandomIndian019 the Brits weren't actually sh*tting in the streets but tossing it out their windows into the streets or into the same rivers they took water from
@@CurtisThomas-l9p that's even worse than shitting in the bushes , the also peed on monuments so the government had to install anti pee ridges which worked by directing the flow to the legs of the guy peeing on the building but it didn't stop them
@@CurtisThomas-l9p that's pretty much the entire world pal.
Should I tell you what Aztecs, maories, Africans were doing before colonisation.
All small states attacking each other, a lack of order, and Britain united them and created a single Indian state.
India was not a shithole but it didn't actually exist at the time it was a collection of dozens of principalities and rajahs.
People poop in the streets. It's a literal shithole.
She had great architecture equal in beauty to any in the world . She had great engineering work , merchants , businessmen ,bankers and financers. Not only the greatest shipbuilding nation but she had great commerce and trade by land and sea which extended to all known civilised countries. Such was the India which the British found when they came . Also In 1700 India and china were the richest countries in the world.
One building as beautiful as the bombay station which the british built.
Ancient India before Britain existed: hold my manuscripts
Buildings more beautiful than the CST station in Mumbai:
Mysore Palace
Taj Mahal
Lotus Temple
Auroville Dome
Cybertecture Egg
Gandhi Bhawan
statue of unity!
Ajantha temples , southern Indian temples , ... R built 4
That 2Even before Brits become a nation , while they busy shifting in jungles and using stone Peebles to wipe their ass
V built gigantic temples , schools teaching all sort subjects for students all around the world
It's not fair to expect a wood head who juz a few gen ago upgraded from rocks Peebles to toilet paper and using spoons and forks instead of knifes to have know others history, may b he's shitting lies knowingly shameless
Ajantha temples , southern Indian temples , ... R built 4
That 2Even before Brits become a nation , while they busy shifting in jungles and using stone Peebles to wipe their ass
V built gigantic temples , schools teaching all sort subjects for students all around the world
It's not fair to expect a wood head who juz a few gen ago upgraded from rocks Peebles to toilet paper and using spoons and forks instead of knifes to have know others history, may b he's shitting lies knowingly shameless
@@isodimetrixgifted by france
Ram mandir
India was the richest nation on the earth and it was invaded more than 200 times in its history… because the foreign invaders were envious of its riches.
Worlds largest structure Angkor wat temple was build by Indian Kings while westerners were nomadics. 😂
If India was so smart and rich then how did it get invaded by a bunch of nomads?
@@nhoyle8609 for its riches. In 200 years under British rule, India GDP declined from 30% of world’s GDP share to 2%.
@@sirivennelasastry when has a country with 30% of global GDP been dominated so easily by a bunch of nomads in the whole of human history?
I get that India was wealthy but:
A) that was pre-industrialisation
B) 99.99% of the population was still in abject poverty 200 years ago. Who cares if some Maharaja's got rich
@@nhoyle8609 1) Angkor Wat was built thousands of years ago. West was nomadic at that time.
2) India has always been rich and democratic for more than 5000 years ago. Its people never had hunger deaths until foreign rulers invaded and started looting. Climate , soil, rivers etc in most part of the country are the best for agriculture. One can live year long without the help of clothes (meaning temperatures are best for living) for the most part of the country. Europe, with its harsh weather, and attitude of invasion, always was forced to invent, such as locomotives, rail transport, guns, for just survival.
@@awaken3d as I said before, India is so rich and culturally developed with lots of food for everyone, unlike Europe where food was scarce. Europeans had to loot someone else, and living conditions were horrible and they had to invent weapons and machines to survive in harsh conditions. Read my posts above for more info. India’s power is in its culture and wisdom for more than 10,000 years. They are not powerful barbarians.
Two words for Tucker...... Taj Mahal.
yes. Taj Mahal is SECOND most beautiful.
@@frankjoyce76 LOL!
Whose side you are on?
One word..... After
@@ainzy3889 True.
You can blame the west for colonizing India.But the colonization wouldnt have been possible without the cooperstion from Indians themselves.
Absolutely true. Kala sahibs were there at that time and they still exist. A section of Indian elites were working hand in glove abetting the loot of their motherland.
@@IndicVoicesIts the same way Mughals were able to rule us.Sad isnt it?
Western colonialism is the only reason india has anyform of industrialisation.
this is like if a builder comes to your house unannounced and unwanted, starts building a wall or something, then steals your jewellery and makes YOU pay for the wall
Don't argue with the people who wipe their ass with papers
😂😂😂😂😂
Lotus Temple - Delhi
Akshardharm Temple - Delhi
Vidhuana Soudha Building - Bangalore
IIT Management Building - Ahmedabad
Palace of Assembly - Chandigarh
Kanchanjunga Apartments - Mumbai
The Fact To Laugh on is That The British Looted Everything From us , But Still Thier GDP is Below India 😂😂😂😂🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Dude grow up😂😂
Compare the population density of both countries.
@@rob12x56 We Have More Population Than Your Country But Still Our Economy and GDP is More Than Your Country After The Fact That Your Ancestors Looted Everything From us. So You Should Grow Up Kid !. 😂😂😂
@@rob12x56 A Stupid Excuse in the Form of a Reply. I was Talking About Our Devolepment , Despite The Fact Your Ancestors Looted Everything From us , We Still Made ourselves Economically and Politically Strong and You are Talking About Population Density , Seriously... ??? Dude I Think You Should Grow Up. 😂😂😂
Deindustrialization,increasing poverty rate, non white population growth,increase of homeless people this is just the beginning now they are crying for FTA
Racism in the genes and blood😂😂
Our people, our money, our land, the buildings in India solely belong to India either its Taj Mahal or Chatrapati shivaji terminus but they come nowhere infront of our ancient architectures. Mark my words Britain will never surpass India now. Try your best and we will develop more and more to uphold our past glory. "The golden bird".
Lmao india hasn't surpassed the uk in most things .
Wtf are you even talking about??
Your glory is completely imaginary, if you knew history you would know it
Education is illegal in america even the journalists are clowns😂
I’m not saying that those two tv personalities aren’t wrong. But it would have been great to see the person who put together this short respond with something other than insults. Makes the watcher think there is no fact based rebuttal to their statements.
Facts. British left india as a ruined civilization. Famine life expectancy lower than 20 years illiteracy etc.. they distryed leached india.
I do not have time to respond to every comment. Check my other replies. Anyway, here is the one. It was a reply to another person, just copy-pasting as is:
-------------
What points did these two racist idiots raise? Sati(widow burning), railroad, educational institutes, wonderful things Britain did to India, extracting resources/minerals, indoor plumbing, beautiful buildings, creating wealthy country out of third world hell hole. Let's take one by one.
Sati(widow burning) - Do you know how many widows were burnt in India? Check the data. More women were burnt in Europe in the name of witch burning. During that time, condition of women were pathetic everywhere. And, it was not Britain that stopped it. They did not give a damn about it or any other social/religious maladies as long as their loot were continuing uninterrupted. It was our men like Rammohan Roy who made the British government ban it.
Railroad - Britain built railroad for making the loot of Indian resources faster. Common people were so poor that only a small section could afford a rail journey. It was paid by Indian tax payer's money. British investors made fortune out of it. Per kilometer cost of building Indian railroad were few times than Canada, America, Australia. That's the amount British investors looted in the name of railroad building.
Educational institutes - During the time of independence India's literacy rate was 13% and same figure of England was over 95%. This simple data proves my point. Only a scoundrel will say Britain educated India. It actually destroyed Indian educational institutes for first one hundred years. What they built later was needed to create elite class and a working class to serve in their government.
Wonderful things Britain did to India - 15 to 30 million people died in famines during British period. Right after British left there was not a single famine. Some magic happened I guess or maybe that is the wonderful thing that Britain did, as per that hideous woman in the video.
Extracting resources/minerals - Nothing was used for the development of India. All were shipped back to that island nation. India was Britain's largest importer of finished goods and at the same time largest exporter of raw material to Britain. While British people rejoiced on Indian loot, Indians languished.
Indoor plumbing - Really? All the villages did not have toilets even few years back. 90% of Indians were living in poverty when Britain left. And, this creature is talking about indoor plumbing? By the way, Indians knew about indoor plumbing and sanitation 5000 years back during Indus Valley civilization. Check the archeological facts. Who is teaching whom?
Beautiful buildings - Check any modern buildings in India. Just check Infosys buildings. Those are enough. Want to go back? Check any major temples of ancient India. And who said Taj Mahal was built by West Asians? It was 100% designed and built by Indians. It was influenced by Islamic architecture because the king of that period was a Muslim, not a foreigner like Victoria.
Creating wealthy country out of third world hell hole - This is the best. One has to be f-ing racist b***ard to say this. India was world's richest country before Britain colonized it. Remember British East India Company was founded on 1600. It took more than 150 years to get control over the land. They came here because it was the richest. India had 25% of the world GDP before the British took control in 1757. When they left, India’s share was 2%. India was industrial powerhouse. It was number one in steel, ship building, garments, gems, agriculture. Britain destroyed each and every industry one by one by punitive taxes/tariffs, taking away resources/capital and definitely by violence. Entire Europe's industrialization was funded by loot from the colonies. India was the prime source.
Today all colonies (except China) are still struggling with poverty, illiteracy, and lack of industrialization. Japan was not colonized, and look at their success in modern era. Most of those still reach out to their erstwhile colonizers or their institutions like IMF, World Bank for capital that was once stolen from them. And, neo-colonization has not stopped yet. Still the natural and human resources of Asia and Africa are exploited to its fullest in the name of free market capitalism. While someone in America enjoys morning coffee or after-dinner chocolate, some malnourished boy in Africa is forced to work 18 hours a day to get the cocoa beans harvested, processed and delivered to some American or European chocolate manufacturing corporation for a few dimes. This is modern day slavery. Read, for god’s sake. Think what will happen if these so-called first world countries stop getting manufactured goods starting from garments to laptops, and services from the third world countries. If they have to manufacture all those, prices will rise exponentially and you know what will happen? They will also become third world countries.
So, have some respect for others and stop eulogizing the worst kind of crimes that happened and are still happening in the name of colonialism and crony capitalism.
Destroyed 30+ major Gurukul universities across India and imposed wastern education on us saying we built school is like a huge hypocrite statement they ever made
When tourists visits india i dont think their list would prioritize visiting Bombay rail station over taj mahal, and our magnificent temples whoes building processes are still a mystery to modern science.....this is prime example of Backlash of pretended half assed knowledge 😂
No, but they would be using British-built infrastructure the entire time they were there.
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater it isn't British build we paid for it very heavily , all those infra were purchased 3x of its price .
@@TheMan-cz5mu The British spread the industrial revolution's technology, infrastructure and engineering around the world. Railways, communications infrastructure and roads were built by the British, in British colonies.
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater what do you think that British built all our roads,airports,ports,railway and metro 🤣🤣
@@bbrruuhhhhh19 Most of the schools, universities, roads, the railways, ports, the telegraph system, and the irrigation canals. The airports less so, as they were largely built post-independence. :-)
Till 2 centuries ago, you burned so many women for accusations of witchcraft
Witch burning stopped in the early 1700's. Sati wasn't abolished until 1829 when the British made it so.
@@samsativa245Raja Ram Mohan Roy stopped Sati, not the British.
@@dipannath9319 No, the British said that if the practise was to continue, they will start hanging the people who do it. so the Indian lawmakers who answered to their British overlords did as they were told.
@@samsativa245 But who's idea was this? It was Ram Mohan Roy's. He fought against sati. General William Bentinck just passed the law because he was in power. Other Britishers did not care. We were second class citizens to them.
@@dipannath9319 The Christian British viewed it as a pagan practise and anti-christian
In the 17 th-18th century china and india were only country to be marvellous in trade and spices😅😅
Imagine being 'marvellous' at trade and spices but not having a Navy capable of contesting any foreign invasion. weak
@@samsativa245 ever heard of chatrapati shivaji Maharaj he had navy that defeated british, portuguese and dutch
@@Vayu_arya give the name of these battles
@@Vayu_arya lmao 🤣🤣🤣
Did indians navy ever fought two superpowers like France and spain as Horatio nelson did??
Did indian navy ever fought wars in US and south America???
Did india ever stop a powerful force like Spanish armada???
Don't make me laugh🤣🤣
The royal navy would easily decimate any indian kingdom even Hitler said that rohal navy was unbeatable.
@@jj591 before 17 th century china and india controlled over 50% of world's GDP,I am not talking about army,china and india have great history of internal wars,conflicts and battles,when we left wars kids started doing world wars🤣
It's like a robber saying that he got robbed by the victim 😂
@@D402S conquerer* .
There's no such thing as robber in history.
This is also not factually correct. The East India company initially tolerated Sati. Sati was a practice that was initially relegated to elite Rajput clans and was opposed by the Mughals. Raja Ram Mohan Roy and later the British opposed the practice of Sati. 😅 Not surprising that both journalists are conservative political commentators, with Tucker Carlson being the foremost proponent of Trumpism. 😅 Read - We say stupid things to make a living.
When Britains came, india was world’s leading GDP. When they left, it was somewhere at the bottom. This is ENOUGH proof of where they left India
You do realise that had to do with industrial revolution and great divergence right??
@@vatsal7640 yes and what stopped India to not hop onto Industrial Revolution?
@@JustBigdataindia was an agrarian society, it always has been one
It wouldn't have industrialized.
India's nominal GDP doubled under the British raj
@vatsal7640
Very interesting, tell me more please,I'm not sure what you mean by divergence in this context.
@@jacquelinepaul9731 it's given on wikepedia, Angus Maddison himself proved it
As a Brit I would massively disagree with what these guys say, the British empire brought many things to India in the same way Rome brought many thing to Britain. They brought nice buildings but for their own people not the British, the story of Boudicca is enough evidence of that. The British were just the modern version for India, brought many things but destroyed many more
I agree
I like that you, in a very nice way, highlighted that Britain was also colonised (for almost 400 years) too…people seem to conveniently ignore this and just go with recency bias and perhaps another bias
I wish more people were like you.I don't really blame current Brits for anything and reparations from the taxes of present day Brits doesn't seem reasonable . Serious acknowledgement of crimes would be better . What actually bothers me is people who justify colonialism and think that the colonized nations prior to imperialists were inferior .
@@aastha3428-It is all Ghengis Khan's fault. Seriously, where has never been "colonized"?
I just feel so anger for these ppl ...if they know the truth why speak such hideous words...and if they dont know the truth how disgusting of them to speak such atrocious words
Oh please!! Indians talking as if they are only ones who knows true history
Maturity is when we realise Colonialism had some positive aspects too
Maturity is when we realize that if colonization did not come we would have become a developed nation faster as the wealth would not have been sucked out of the country.
@@IndicVoices I am not saying that it had all positive aspects but there more negative
No offense
@@IqbalKaur-es6ocwhat positive aspects? As an American, all the British did was just tax the hell out of us and shoot us
Tucker is correct. ...
My grandmother liked Britishers coz they built schools and colleges for girls and lower caste people also. They also made anti child marriage laws twice... I know they came for wealth but I can't deny that I can't imagine being a woman in India if they won't come.
Every country in middle age was feudalistic and biased against women, including Britain. Britain did not colonize China directly. Do you mean China is any less civilized today?
Come on. If Britain did not come we would have been more wealthy and socially progressive today. Because of Britain we only had only 13% education rate in 1947 whereas Britain had over 90%. If we got education early, women empowerment would have come early too.
@@IndicVoices you would not be more wealthy, stop the c0pe. Without the british, there would be no india, just a bunch of different states
@@IndicVoices India was far behind Britain at the time of British colonisation, both in terms of technology as well as socially with womens rights etc. You didnt even have a navy strong enough to contest anything at sea, yet at the same time you say india was rich from a sea trade network that Britain stole from you. LOL
@@samsativa245 Please read Inglorious Empire by Tharoor and Anarchy by Dalrymple.
British East India company was formed in 1600 AD was doing business with India since then. They took 157 years to get control over India. Try to understand why. What happened during 1700 to 1757 that made India weak.
Talking about Navy? Indian ships were full of Arabian Sea. It is written by travellers at that time. Mughal army was stronger than multiple European empires together. It used to be said that Jagat Seth was richer than Bank of England. The anarchy of 50 years (post Aurangzeb) made the road for Britain
@@IndicVoices Weird how you're trying to imply that India doing trade with the East India Co. between 1600-1757 made India weaker. Surely opening a new trading network with the Europeans benefitted India at first. The Company gained a foothold when it was granted the rights to build factories there. It wasn't until after 1757, the Battle of Plassey, where India sided with the FRENCH EAST INDIA Co. and LOST that the British East India Co. began to take over and rule Indian territory.
During the First Anglo-Mughal War (1686-1690) the Mughals actually DEFEATED the East Indian Co. It wasn't until Plassey in 1757, when Mir Jafar sided with the British instead of siding with the French that British East India company started to rule India and make it weaker. Learn your history properly.
The Mughals made India then the Brits extended it's size, bottomline no Mughals and Brits no nation of India
When you persue graduation from madarsa😂😂😂😂
@abhijeetyadav7447 Whatever Mandirchaap whatever....
Your ignorance and stupidity is beyond words.
@4791msj Murakh the exyonm of Sindhu was strictly in reference to the region that is coterminous 🇵🇰! As for the concept of state this is almost entirely an British construct though no doubt Mughals played an role!
At what cost? Ann Coulter
he is right
if he is right how come india was richest land on earth before british came to become poorest land on earth after british ?
@@Love-wz4vgit wasn't???
I mean, it wasn't even a country.
@@rob12x56 DUDE COLUMBUS WENT TO FIND INDIA , he knew india existed
you people had no civilization back then , we had our civilization , there was a reason why everyone wanted to find india
@@Love-wz4vg Dude Columbus is completely irrelevant here.
And lol no civilisation?????😂🤣😂
Europe had the largest empires at that time . They had more powerful guns and ships
Htf can you even say that ????
@@rob12x56 america is alone superpower now
Who founded america? It was Columbus
Why European looking for India when you had so much civilisation
Before European and Muslims came
India was richest and the same time spiritual dharmic civilisation of the world
You're civilisation made India poor not rich
Just include British looting India for over 190 years and 45 trillion pounds and all the golds, diamond and other resources....
800 tonnes of soil lifted from kolar gold fields..aka KGF...british loot
Fake number sorry pal
@@APS378 I don't know that you are fake.....
@@bibinunni5561 fake numbers buddy
@@jj591 are you even a brit...
Britain did not create wealthy countries. Britain got wealthy from exploiting natural wealth and resources from their colonies. Name one emperor of that time that actually invested in their empire and were benevolent in their practices towards local populations.
And they say they brought civilization, plumbing, roads…there was civilization already, and nobody asked them to come colonize and bring the trappings of their own homes just because they wanted that same luxury there. It wasn’t to benefit from the people.
😂 maybe defend it… oops your weaker than us now cry about it!
@@-ANGLO-SAXON-1 Huh?
Jesus, I hadn’t heard from Ann Coulter in ages. I thought she’d been locked in an asylum. Did they release her recently?
they don,t deserve to talk about a country they don,t understand , shame on them
I think we should be silent now and instead of replying by word ,let the people of the whole of India be ready for reply by action.👍
And then from the international stage let them ask ,where is our 45 trillion worth of wealth.
Then the entire international community will laugh at you.
Because there's no proof of this fictional 45 trillion dollars
The entire world will laugh at you then😂😂😂
Nobody believes in figure claimed by an old Marxist.
It never belonged to the typical Indian...ever. And that figure is fiction...keep growing tea and cotton. India is the laughing stock of Asia.
British civilized America not india
Both, and arguably America did more itself as it gained independence nearly 200 years earlier.
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater Egypt, Mesopotamia and Indus valley civilizations were the only three civilizations in the world thousands of years ago. During this time, europeans were living in caves 😂😂
@@KanuniSuleyman4857 You're absolutely right! And?
The British Empire brought democracy, infrastructure and economic development to much of the globe, not just India or the Americas.
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater they brought peace and prosperity only to those areas who obeyed, accepted their cultural superiority and assimilated into their culture while those who wanted to keep their identity separate from those of European colonists, they didn't let them prosper. That's why countries like USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are known as Children of the British 😂😂
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater And also world was already familiar with civilzation way before colonial powers took over the world. Chinese, Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Hittites, Mitannis, Greeks, Persians, Arabs, Nubians, Aksumites, Phoenicians, Carthagians and Japanese were great civilizations who contributed much more than the Europeans in building bases of human civilization on earth
Brits☕☕
He is American, can't you tell by his accent?
@@jj591They are the same. They are white, speak the same phuking crap, and follow the same religion
@@D402S lmao by that logic Pakistanis and indians are all same since they both look similar.
You just straight up mixed religion, race and nationality.
Well done!!
He is American,not british.
@@jj591nahh,indians aren't used to much accents.
American and british accent actually sounds much similar if you aren't born in a place with one of the mentioned accents.
As an Arab , I’d like to say “Welcome to the club”
Wait what!!! Are my eyes working right!!!
Sir, have you ever heard about the deindustrialization of India by the so called Raj?
Did you ever hear about the textile and ship building industry that India had and how it was demolished by imposing 80% tariff and cutting off the thumbs of the workers?
Do you have any idea how horrible the pictures were on Kolkata roads during great Bengal famine ? Dead bodies were scattered around the streets and no one was left to perform the funerals.
Do you know how much they looted from India? And how rich India was before they arrived? Never heard of any country getting richer by being deindustrialized, looted, oppressed , killed, enslaved divided and demoralized.
I am sure even if they do not know in detail, they have ideas. The problem is these people are imperialist, racist to the core.
" cutting off thumbs of weavers"
That's a myth , literally given on wilepedia.
And india wasn't wealthier than modern day. British India had higher per capita and gdp than mughal India
@@IndicVoices maybe what they said is false, but Indians were no different than the British or any other empire of that time
@@jj591
Good joke dawg! You brits didn't do anything to civilize us. When you people were still hunting and living in caves, we the Indians were already building empires, ancient Marvels in the form of temples, studying space & teaching foreign students in our ancient Universities about astronomy, metallurgy, philosophy, medicine, mathematics, engineering & influencing other countries like China, & many South East Asian countries.
Don't talk nonsense without knowing anything.
@@jj591 we were much better and richer , otherwise why would they even want to trade with us ?
Meanwhile 12 to 15 bridges collapsed during last month
Come and take it, if you can.
🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
Infrastructures REALLY 😂😂
Yes, really. India has one of the most extensive railway networks on Earth. ;-)
@@AlexanderTheEvenGreater it was built after independence 🤣🤣
@@bbrruuhhhhh19 If you compare the 1909 Indian Railways map to the current one, you will see that the majority of lines in existence today were obviously built by the British. Yes, there have been some new lines built since, but most of the vast original network was built by the British.
@AlexanderTheEvenGreater 53,994 km of railway track. In 1947 and in 2021, it was 121,407 km of railway track. So false
They don't have rich people like Mukesh Ambani and tell them to give 45 trillion dollars without speaking any word
They do have rich people and Britain never took 45 trillion dollars
First give proof
@@AdityaKumar-gn2wj great Britain lost more money in India then in any other colony.
Most historians agree on this in modern day.
And plz don't act as Britain was poor or weak before conquest of india
@@AdityaKumar-gn2wj no, you guys are making up your own frictional history
@@AdityaKumar-gn2wjactually, the British never stole 45 trillion as you claimed, the British was really rich before coming to India as they profited a huge amount on the Atlantic slave trade and had many colonies prior to that, I mean how do you even inflate the number and get an exact number for how much the British stole, it’s also inflated in dollars.
@@AdityaKumar-gn2wj there is a language barrier between us so let’s end this conversation otherwise it’ll become confusing
India’s caste system rationalizes any lasting effects Britain has on India.
They left a Civilized India? Nah, before the British came and introduce education, Indians already got education, the Indians go to school sometimes under a tree, sometimes in a ground, bc sitting in one classroom and learning for 5 or 6 hrs a day feels like Jail
They Introduce Christianity, good i am an Indian-Christian but did they introduce Christiany like Jesus did, by love,Gospel? No, the British introduce a law in which says, " Anyone who converted to Christian faith, will have a right to own their ancestors land".
Mahatma Gandhi say he like Jesus but he dont like the people that follow him.
They build railway tracks? From the same railway track they transport Indian Goods (Gold,Silver,coal,gem,diamond,iron,spices,etc) to their land.
But not all British are theives, Some British officer who got insanely rich after coming to India, got called back to Britain, he appeared in court, they ask him how he got his money, and later he suicide
when you were hunting gathering we have a civilization
That civilization was in modern day Pakistan
Most of India was also hunting animals.
Did you forget that or what?
@@jj591 oh that was civillization at that time where was your
@@udaynarayan3522 ever heard of Stonehenge??
@@jj591 becoz u people divided India and now and ofcourse the civilisation is now is Pakistan but in ancient time Pakistan was India 🙂
@@AbhinavKumar-xy8gn lol Indian subcontinent was never divided in the first place either.
Well they did help them modernize. Everyone did bad things back then why the victim shaming.
We were the most industrialized nation in the 18th century. Britain did not modernize us. They modernized themselves at the expense of us.
Japan was not colonized. So, they moved up the ladder faster in the 20th century. The same goes for China. All the colonized nations struggled and are still struggling.
@@IndicVoices hmmm no that’s not correct. I find it strange how people use the word colonize these days. it’s in our dna to explore and find new land to prosper grow our families and loved ones. Only a liberal college idiot sees it as a bad thing. This is how ideas got spread back then this is how science and knowledge moved around the earth.
@@IndicVoices people want to demonize “white” countries that were far more advanced than they were at that time. But now all of them move to those countries because they cannot fit into the new world their leaders fail to make proper decisions for the people. Let’s blame it on people hundreds of years ago.
Mmm not true
If you were the most industrialized nation how did you let a small island on the other side of the world take you over.? Y’all have thousands of years to build your civilization.
As an American, it is so frustrating to hear this ignorance but it is not surprising.
Because two things can be true at the same time.
That's a very mature and profound way to look at it.
At anything really.
They're comparing wealth?
Mughal Empire was literally the richest empire in the world. So yeah, India was definitely not poor in the Medieval Ages.
Modern India is a British invention
@@Justin-df9ev British colonised India, that doesn't mean India wouldn't have been a developed country without the British. India was doing pretty well before the British. India had the world's 1/4 GDP in the 17th century. So, yeah India would have been way better off without British.
@@Papaty25uhhhh....
No, it had quarter of world's GDP only because of its population. Lol
Great divergence read it.
@@rob12x56 India's population was not more than 10 million in 1600s. Besides, whole India wasn't unified as the Mughal Empire. Back then, India=Mughal Empire.
@@Papaty25 it was around 100 million and Mughal empire wasn't entire india
British Empire 🇬🇧 was the most advanced in the world with laws, infrastructure, parliamentary democracy, the BE also disbanded serfdom from the Moguls, the Indians were slaves to the Mugals 😮
IN 5 YEARS THE WHOLE WEST WILL KNOW HOW INDIAN IS. AND I WILL DO IT MY SELF