I know dr Peterson will probably never see this but thank you sir. When I was at my lowest I found this series and it saved my life. I have shared it with a couple of my best friends that were suicidal and on the edge and it brought them back and we all now are thriving instead of surviving! Thanks isn’t sufficient but it is the only word that begins to approach the gratitude that I have for you and your work. Thanks for not only my life but my friends lives as well.
Indeed almost a death experience makes someone decide to live and not waste time anymore in their lifetime. This lecture has an incredible deep knowledge.
I appreciate that Peterson admits that there are many things we just don't understand and possibly can't. He doesn't appear happy about this, but he is resigned to it, which is an important component in seeking and sharing knowledge.
It must have taken me 30 minutes to write down the whole bit about the shamanic initiation through personal quest at 33:50 but I feel like a big chunk of me just woke up and realized what really motivates me in this life. I'm gana hang these notes somewhere where I can always see them throughout the day to remind myself of who I am and why I'm here. If by chance you see this Dr. Peterson, I just want to say thank you for all your hard work you changed my life!
Dr. Peterson is right on about what he says around the 30 minute mark, regarding how the university doesn't celebrate the best of humanity in its stale architecture, and that it's deliberate. I think it has to do with the horrors of the 20st Century, most of which were thought up in the lecture halls, and I think that the danger and mass murder has to do with scapegoating humanity and not malignant teachings, manifested in these sort of superficial attempts at humility (moral relativism, generalized disunity, ethical neutrality, stale architecture, platonic detachment, etc., in favor of radical individualism). I think it's driven by scapegoating humanity for the sins that did take place in university, and attempting to delude human passion with banality. That's my opinion on that specific issue. Great lecture.
@@215rsudhir9 yeah sure, it's just the force with which Peterson believes in the value of beauty and aesthetics among other values and can't help but Share them in relationship to what he sees as a society losing sight of there importance/ relevance/ significance
I’m very glad Dr. Peterson is getting attention, however I couldn’t imagine the progress his audience would make if these were watched as much as the others!
My wife is currently in mental hospital (voluntarily) with a personality disorder. She is making huge huge progress. And I cant describe my inner happiness. Her transformation. Death and rebirth. Trying to hide, reaching for unreachable ideal, being vulnerable because of being conscious. I cant put it in words... This is really something. P.S. Sapolsky's lectures on YT are on the same lvl. Check it out after this.
Dear professor Peterson, your work is monumental and I might add of historical importance in this times ... considering you teach young students the essentials of Buddhism, Hinduism through essence of Alexandria - the Gnostics - and western alchemy school of thought. I often wondered how the schooling imagined by Huxley in "The Island" would look like. I think like this. Thank you very much. There still is hope. Too bad - and here I hope I'm wrong - this courses are accessible and popular only among psychology students.
Mm... Peterson isn't entirely correct concerning the nervous system at around 22:00. For one thing he refers to the "Central nervous system" as being throughout the body, talking about the autonomic nervous system. Technically speaking, the CNS refers *specifically* to the spinal cord and brain; everything else is the peripheral nervous system. The CNS is separated by a membrane from the rest of the body, even though it (obviously) does process signals to and from the peripheral nervous system. Also, walking is an unconscious action, yes, but it's controlled by pattern-generating neurons in the brain stem, not the spinal cord as such. I'm sure he's probably brushing over this for brevity, but accuracy is useful.
Old trees in old-growth forests have a gigantic root network and often give life to several dozens or hundreds of other trees. The play a very important role in the development of a forest even after it has been partially destroyed by a wild-fire for example
Just like the old and wise people of the past who kept civilization and culture together even after tremendous disasters like the great flood, collapse of empires, etc
I'm simultaneously loving and hating his curriculum. My personality fits (almost entirely) into the pathological. However, it is quite nice to be learning how to recognize/repair some of the more detrimental symptoms. Thank you Dr. Peterson.
TheMitch789 he’s certainly eccentric. Apparently he had spontaneous visions back when he was teaching at Harvard (in the 90’s), and also wears capes and masks around the house to this day. (Source: The Rise of Jordan Peterson (movie))
Around 13 min mark - "Animals can't project their needs (hunger) into the future." (paraphrased) But... what about squirrels hiding food and ravens, too - for example?
I wonder if a squirrel could tell you why it hides nuts. It could just be instinctive. Ravens, though. They are very smart and tool users, which means they can think in abstract ways. They may know why they do what they do.
Yeah hamsters are natural hordes, so I imagine squirrels are much the same, it's a natural and instinctive behavior necessary for survival. Though you might be right about ravens, I remember reading somewhere that crows might be able to comprehend death to some degree, along with a whole host of complex cognitive abilities.
Have you ever felt like this whenever you learn something important like this you have learnt many things from this lecture you feel like you are having revelations. ( I imagine myself lifting in the air slowly with my hands wide sucking in the knowledge in form of air and getting powers)
Great lecture, around the 1:21:00 minute mark there was an error regarding ancient Jews and their abandoning the pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton [Yhwh's name] on account of pronouncing it transgressing being. That's actually a later development. It's actually a very loaded subject, but looking a little closer the Tanakh uses the Tetragrammaton nearly 7k times, a great many of which repeatedly command people to use the name, swear by it, worship by it, etc. What occurred was a translation issue after the Babylonian exile from Proto-Hebrew to early Aramaic, which wasn't (and isn't) too different from Hebrew. That translation changed Exodus 20:7 from saying, "You shall not misuse the name of Yhwh." to something like (this is the English equivalent to the error), "You shall not use the name of Yhwh." Thus beginning the tradition, much contrary to all other literature and a logical reading of the Tanakh. This was an error in the priestly schools, who were the bulk of the exiles, who were also some of the only literate folks in the ancient world, so checks and balances were far looser than in a literate society. You have to also factor in sectarianism, as the priestly schools weren't appreciating foreign people using the Tetragrammaton in incantations (popular at the time) or in competing pantheons, also the exile which was viewed as retaliation for impiety leading to hyper-piety, finally consider general esotericism, or the ability to claim some special divine knowledge. There were many incentives to miss this error, however it wasn't arrived at by a prophetic figure or a gradual cultural change, rather by foreign influence on language during the exile coupled with a willingness to be even more pious than before. The name itself has three meanings. Initially, and this name is preserved, Ehyeh means, "I am," and also, "I will be," and, "I cause to be." All are correct. Names in Hebrew are meant to describe an identity, so when parents name children, they identify them often by their hopes for them. Pay attention to names in the Tanakh for that reason. Now, when Yah names himself, the idea was that he was making a statement about his own being to humanity, having no parents or authority to say, "You are X." Therefore his name is, "Ehyeh." and that sums up who the Creator is: He just is and causes to be. And of course, since it's a first person statement, his name is obviously converted to Yhwh, a pronunciation which is debated and potentially lost due to the post-exilic prohibition, and that name understandably means, "He is," and also, "He will be," and, "He causes to be." So phenomenal lecture. That understanding at the 1:21:00 is accurate to internal Rabbinical understandings of the Tetragrammaton, but only insofar as the Rabbis are concerned through their writings, writings of the Pharisaical school. Non-exilic modern and ancient Samaritans, modern Karaites, ancient Sadducees, Essenes, etc., none observed the Oral Torah/Talmud tradition and would have different opinions regarding the Tetragrammaton and if it should be pronounced and why. It's an extremely controversial issue, but it only describes why the Pharisaical school stood by the name prohibition after the fact, aimed mainly at justifying of a tradition based on semantic error. It is an extremely grievous error considering what the Tanakh has to say about the name, commanding the use of it, and so there is enormous incentive not to correct it for the last of the schools that mistakenly prohibited it.
Justin Whipperman this is a subject of great interest to me- could you elaborate? I am not familiar with an aramaic translation from around the time of the exile (the only aramaic translations i am aware with are the targums) which translation is it? do we have copies of it? or do we only have references to it? if the latter, in which documents?
Ive had these two tattoos on my arms i was drawn to them from the show full metal alchemist and those tattoos are the ouroboros on one arm and the serpent and cross on the other arm. I question a deeper question as to why these symbols pulled me in to put them on my body forever. the past year or so has been awakening me to such profound understanding of so many things it can only be described as madness. I have gone through the psychedelic trip after tragedy of my fathers death left bereft in this world I plunged into my own psyche and this man has a very acute way of explaining what the hell is happening with me, as i could not at the time. But i keep seeing the explanation of my tattoos in theology and wonder if unconsciously i got them to remind me of something more than i understood when i got them idk just putting thoughts down i guess 🤷♂️
anyone on here who contemplated watching all these lectures for free nd getting the knowledge for free but not the certificate. Did anyone go into psychology after watching these lectures? I am interested in the information but unsure as to whether I should pursue it as a career? Any thought would be helpful!! Cheers Guys
I've used this knowledge to improve my life and to fix my relationship with my family, which is ultimately the localized goal of psychology. If you identify with the idea of bringing that process of redemption forward for as many people as possible, then go right ahead men!
13:45 - I heard that birds of prey won’t completely deplete a nest they are feasting on. Presumably because they understand the life cycle of their prey.
1:19:40 - Some physics folks will eviscerate anyone who brings forth the notion that a "conscious observer" is required. They want to kill that idea as dead as they can possibly kill it. I think, though, this whole issue is smack in the "we really just don't know" arena. Their reasons for so vehemently opposing that notion has more to do with what they "want to believe" than it does with what is "scientifically clear." In fact, you can tell from that vehemence itself that you've pushed one of their emotional buttons. I hope we'll get to understand these things better someday, but honestly I can't say that I have "real hope" that we will. I think some things will just prove to be "beyond science."
You using Disney analogies is so clutch in my shamanic situation since I’m dealing in my last transitional phase of the rosicrucians that’ll be another year and change of training and understanding the disorder as the disorder is brought onto me as I finished my Mason situation which Disney is a part of both orders and have a whole story behind it ... I have a unique story and I’m quite tired and this lecture and Disney helped much. It’s been almost seven years due to my ancestral background, and death for me doesn’t happen for a bit 😔 but I’m getting there. Again great lecture totally needed.
Question to all of you out there. According to Dr. Peteroson, facing one's death means you shouldn't waste time. But if the acceptance of this eventual ending means also freed from the shackles of having to fill that time, then are you even wasting it? Is simply 'being' enough?
"you might be the only one thats insane like you" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 my life. I feel crazy things that I cant explain to 100% of people, even to gurus and woo-woo's they cant understand it. SO i have to hide a part of me that NO ONE, knows. Thats a tough life to live man
the individuals who are responsible for the appearance of the university's physical structures are responding to symbols being manifested by their own subconscious
Fascinating to look back on those comments at around 33 minutes in, about comics superheroes embodying or representing or updating the eternal myths. Here we are a few years later, after the woke mob took over both Marvel and DC, emasculating the hero myth and taking what used to be about Truth and Justice and classically structured adventure [which is the hero quest, underneath] - and turning it into some kind of preaching platform for sexual diversity. The comics companies are committing a massive crime against the needs and patterns of popular culture itself by corrupting the cultural icons handed down to them, supposedly to preserve and nurture to inspire future generations. I don’t mean that sexual diversity is corrupt. I mean that if you concentrate on heroes, and by implication the readers that admire them, pursuing Truth and Justice and just Defeating the Bad Guys, you should automatically get tolerance and diversity as a consequence. But turning heroes into representatives of the utterly mythical LGBTQ “movement” - as there are uncounted gay and lesbian people who want nothing to do with being “identified” with some collective “social justice” group, as they are proud in their individuality - is just pathetic. A substitute “Superman” having a "thing" about his sexuality, and getting arrested as a “social justice activist” instead of representing the best of all humanity - Jesus! (So to speak!)
This is when, I started watching Jordan’s video. The sexy suave guy Always feels off to me. Not that it is, just not how, I picture him in my head. This is.
Dr. Peterson, do you believe is possible that what gave humanity consciousness, or at least a great contributor were psycadelics? Regarding on the part when you mention that epigenetically it could be possible to alter in some way your genes. Could this changes be passed through generations? Could doing this in millions of years be one part of the answer?
You didn't consider Dr. Peterson because you (we) view him as a great man, one that couldn't possibly do anything so annoying. :D But having watched many many of his videos, I think we can agree that he has an insane amount of energy ... It doesn't surprise me that he fidgets a bit.
What is the 11th-13th century manuscript from which the Adam and Eve mushroom image comes from ... sounds like "EEBWAY" ? ~thank you for posting these lectures
I FOUND IT I FINALLY FUCKING FOUND IT. sorry it took a year mate, but I was curious too so I spent like half an hour trying to find it. it's the Tree of Death and Life by Berthold Furtmeyr
The telling of the garden is very off here. First Eve was tempted by the serpent with a lie in the form of a question seeded with a grain of truth. "Surely you will not die?" This brought about the "eating of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil". Eve then offered this "fruit of the knowledge of good and evil" to Adam of which he partook. Then Adam kills one of Gods creations and covers Eve and himself in the skin of its flesh. Soon thereafter God arrives in the garden and calls Adam fourth to himself. Adam does not respond. I effect he is attempting to hide not only from the sight of God, but also from the consequences of his actions and disobedience. In this case his disobedience was "eating of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil". Of this thing he and the woman were forbade from for it would bring death. If you notice in the story, even this did not anger God enough to remove Adam and the woman from the Garden. So First Eve committed disobedience under a lie told to her. Then she spread the disobedience to Adam. Then Adam destroyed one of Gods creatures in the garden and put its skin on. It was not until Adam made an excuse for his actions, and did not take personal responsibility for what he had done did God become angry with him. Eve also made an excuse in blaming the serpent for her own choice. Hence all were stricken from the Garden.
how does this have any bearing on what Dr.Peterson is referring to? his logic still follows through. he paraphrases on purpose to get his point out quicker without explaining in full. i think its arrogant to belive that Dr.Peterson doesnt know the telling of genesis. pay attention to the ideology not the translation word for word.
where have you lost the fig leaf part of the myth? God gave then skins, a foretaste of the need to shed blood to rectify the state of fallen human nature which only occurred finally and permanently through the crucifixion of the innocent son of God.
I know dr Peterson will probably never see this but thank you sir. When I was at my lowest I found this series and it saved my life. I have shared it with a couple of my best friends that were suicidal and on the edge and it brought them back and we all now are thriving instead of surviving! Thanks isn’t sufficient but it is the only word that begins to approach the gratitude that I have for you and your work. Thanks for not only my life but my friends lives as well.
@Ricardo Guimarães beautifully written comment!
Super honor to you man
WOW!!!
I hope you're still doing well!!!
Hi
@@Strangeall hi 👋
Thank you for being alive in this era
Who is it that You are thanking to?
@@mistermagister1693 😂😂
This lecture deserves millions of views ( as all of Peterson's lectures ) !
I'm subbed to you, wouldn't have thought you listen to JBP
I am agree, this lecture in particular gave me a very profund impact.
Indeed almost a death experience makes someone decide to live and not waste time anymore in their lifetime. This lecture has an incredible deep knowledge.
Showing competence in the face of tragedy is a display of true strength of character
I appreciate that Peterson admits that there are many things we just don't understand and possibly can't. He doesn't appear happy about this, but he is resigned to it, which is an important component in seeking and sharing knowledge.
You something to me! I hope God bless you more and more and your eyes of heart to say on!
He drops so much knowledge. I learn so much in every video. Thank you!
This man has been dropping gems on society for decades now. I am very grateful.
It must have taken me 30 minutes to write down the whole bit about the shamanic initiation through personal quest at 33:50 but I feel like a big chunk of me just woke up and realized what really motivates me in this life. I'm gana hang these notes somewhere where I can always see them throughout the day to remind myself of who I am and why I'm here. If by chance you see this Dr. Peterson, I just want to say thank you for all your hard work you changed my life!
Dr. Peterson is right on about what he says around the 30 minute mark, regarding how the university doesn't celebrate the best of humanity in its stale architecture, and that it's deliberate. I think it has to do with the horrors of the 20st Century, most of which were thought up in the lecture halls, and I think that the danger and mass murder has to do with scapegoating humanity and not malignant teachings, manifested in these sort of superficial attempts at humility (moral relativism, generalized disunity, ethical neutrality, stale architecture, platonic detachment, etc., in favor of radical individualism). I think it's driven by scapegoating humanity for the sins that did take place in university, and attempting to delude human passion with banality. That's my opinion on that specific issue. Great lecture.
I was going to comment about that, it's truly a beautiful thing to behold such vehemence
@@ljph_1995 Can you please explain the above comment in Simpler English good friend?
@@215rsudhir9 yeah sure, it's just the force with which Peterson believes in the value of beauty and aesthetics among other values and can't help but Share them in relationship to what he sees as a society losing sight of there importance/ relevance/ significance
Or its just more cost efficient
I’m very glad Dr. Peterson is getting attention, however I couldn’t imagine the progress his audience would make if these were watched as much as the others!
My wife is currently in mental hospital (voluntarily) with a personality disorder. She is making huge huge progress. And I cant describe my inner happiness. Her transformation. Death and rebirth. Trying to hide, reaching for unreachable ideal, being vulnerable because of being conscious. I cant put it in words... This is really something.
P.S. Sapolsky's lectures on YT are on the same lvl. Check it out after this.
Dear professor Peterson, your work is monumental and I might add of historical importance in this times ... considering you teach young students the essentials of Buddhism, Hinduism through essence of Alexandria - the Gnostics - and western alchemy school of thought. I often wondered how the schooling imagined by Huxley in "The Island" would look like. I think like this. Thank you very much. There still is hope. Too bad - and here I hope I'm wrong - this courses are accessible and popular only among psychology students.
Mm... Peterson isn't entirely correct concerning the nervous system at around 22:00. For one thing he refers to the "Central nervous system" as being throughout the body, talking about the autonomic nervous system. Technically speaking, the CNS refers *specifically* to the spinal cord and brain; everything else is the peripheral nervous system. The CNS is separated by a membrane from the rest of the body, even though it (obviously) does process signals to and from the peripheral nervous system.
Also, walking is an unconscious action, yes, but it's controlled by pattern-generating neurons in the brain stem, not the spinal cord as such. I'm sure he's probably brushing over this for brevity, but accuracy is useful.
I appreciate it.
I believe he was referring to the nerves attached to the CNS
Old trees in old-growth forests have a gigantic root network and often give life to several dozens or hundreds of other trees. The play a very important role in the development of a forest even after it has been partially destroyed by a wild-fire for example
Found the hippie.
Basic tree biology is hippiness for you??
That's interesting!
Just like the old and wise people of the past who kept civilization and culture together even after tremendous disasters like the great flood, collapse of empires, etc
Came here to see this
How in the world does this lecture have such few views!? This is a Gold mine.
Jordan peterson is a behemoth
I'm simultaneously loving and hating his curriculum. My personality fits (almost entirely) into the pathological. However, it is quite nice to be learning how to recognize/repair some of the more detrimental symptoms. Thank you Dr. Peterson.
Wow. Just wow. Jordan is the GOAT
Thank you Prof. Peterson
❤️
This is definitely one of the best lectures.
I just finished 2024 lecture 03. The series is really inspiring to me.
I think Jordan Peterson is, in a way, a modern day Shaman
Thoughts?
substance abuse?
take your pick - shaman, prophet, guru - and you will still be going in the right direction.
I don't know about that. I think he is what he has spent most of his life doing--research scientist
TheMitch789 he’s certainly eccentric. Apparently he had spontaneous visions back when he was teaching at Harvard (in the 90’s), and also wears capes and masks around the house to this day. (Source: The Rise of Jordan Peterson (movie))
Genius and professor
These videos are highly appreciated. Thanks very much.
Around 13 min mark - "Animals can't project their needs (hunger) into the future." (paraphrased)
But... what about squirrels hiding food and ravens, too - for example?
I wonder if a squirrel could tell you why it hides nuts. It could just be instinctive.
Ravens, though. They are very smart and tool users, which means they can think in abstract ways. They may know why they do what they do.
Yeah hamsters are natural hordes, so I imagine squirrels are much the same, it's a natural and instinctive behavior necessary for survival. Though you might be right about ravens, I remember reading somewhere that crows might be able to comprehend death to some degree, along with a whole host of complex cognitive abilities.
>otherwise they wouldn't end up as roadkill.
ruclips.net/video/sq25gXBiEWA/видео.html
Feandril foxes hide stashs too
Lol, I also thought about squirrels..
If I were in his class I’d certainly ask him about that
29:30 wow this part is so right, what a beautiful man
You see the world trough you personality
The world giving form to your personality
Dude where are these notes he is showing the students 😳 captivated by this topic. Timeless conversation. Love ya doc
The production value definitely has improved as well as professor's wardrobe since he joined daily wire.
Have you ever felt like this
whenever you learn something important like this you have learnt many things from this lecture you feel like you are having revelations. ( I imagine myself lifting in the air slowly with my hands wide sucking in the knowledge in form of air and getting powers)
This lecture is constant heat 🔥
27:50 to 30:20
I'll keep your thoughts in mind when I go back to school for Architectural Technology (not an actual architect, but a stepping stone).
that blunt going around in class made me jealous
It was so nice to meet Jorden Peterson…twice!!
28:45 It is true that studying in a massive beautiful cathedral would be a big goal of my life.
that whole bit about wasting time. damn. had to go back to rewatch
Great lecture, around the 1:21:00 minute mark there was an error regarding ancient Jews and their abandoning the pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton [Yhwh's name] on account of pronouncing it transgressing being. That's actually a later development. It's actually a very loaded subject, but looking a little closer the Tanakh uses the Tetragrammaton nearly 7k times, a great many of which repeatedly command people to use the name, swear by it, worship by it, etc. What occurred was a translation issue after the Babylonian exile from Proto-Hebrew to early Aramaic, which wasn't (and isn't) too different from Hebrew. That translation changed Exodus 20:7 from saying, "You shall not misuse the name of Yhwh." to something like (this is the English equivalent to the error), "You shall not use the name of Yhwh." Thus beginning the tradition, much contrary to all other literature and a logical reading of the Tanakh. This was an error in the priestly schools, who were the bulk of the exiles, who were also some of the only literate folks in the ancient world, so checks and balances were far looser than in a literate society. You have to also factor in sectarianism, as the priestly schools weren't appreciating foreign people using the Tetragrammaton in incantations (popular at the time) or in competing pantheons, also the exile which was viewed as retaliation for impiety leading to hyper-piety, finally consider general esotericism, or the ability to claim some special divine knowledge. There were many incentives to miss this error, however it wasn't arrived at by a prophetic figure or a gradual cultural change, rather by foreign influence on language during the exile coupled with a willingness to be even more pious than before.
The name itself has three meanings. Initially, and this name is preserved, Ehyeh means, "I am," and also, "I will be," and, "I cause to be." All are correct. Names in Hebrew are meant to describe an identity, so when parents name children, they identify them often by their hopes for them. Pay attention to names in the Tanakh for that reason. Now, when Yah names himself, the idea was that he was making a statement about his own being to humanity, having no parents or authority to say, "You are X." Therefore his name is, "Ehyeh." and that sums up who the Creator is: He just is and causes to be. And of course, since it's a first person statement, his name is obviously converted to Yhwh, a pronunciation which is debated and potentially lost due to the post-exilic prohibition, and that name understandably means, "He is," and also, "He will be," and, "He causes to be."
So phenomenal lecture. That understanding at the 1:21:00 is accurate to internal Rabbinical understandings of the Tetragrammaton, but only insofar as the Rabbis are concerned through their writings, writings of the Pharisaical school. Non-exilic modern and ancient Samaritans, modern Karaites, ancient Sadducees, Essenes, etc., none observed the Oral Torah/Talmud tradition and would have different opinions regarding the Tetragrammaton and if it should be pronounced and why. It's an extremely controversial issue, but it only describes why the Pharisaical school stood by the name prohibition after the fact, aimed mainly at justifying of a tradition based on semantic error. It is an extremely grievous error considering what the Tanakh has to say about the name, commanding the use of it, and so there is enormous incentive not to correct it for the last of the schools that mistakenly prohibited it.
Justin Whipperman this is a subject of great interest to me- could you elaborate?
I am not familiar with an aramaic translation from around the time of the exile (the only aramaic translations i am aware with are the targums) which translation is it? do we have copies of it? or do we only have references to it? if the latter, in which documents?
Emboided nervous system. The body is the mind and mind is the body.
Regarding the embalming, my recommendation: watch Six Feet Under too! :) It's been one of the cornerstone pieces of media of my early life.
I hope you will talk about this with Sam Harris! This subject is so incredibly fascinating.
29:05 truth bomb. Could you do something about that? stat
00:00 trees and humans, 30:00 the shaman, 1:35:00 we are cultural creatures ,
Would have loved to been a fly on the wall during bedtime stories when his kids were really young
Ive had these two tattoos on my arms i was drawn to them from the show full metal alchemist and those tattoos are the ouroboros on one arm and the serpent and cross on the other arm. I question a deeper question as to why these symbols pulled me in to put them on my body forever. the past year or so has been awakening me to such profound understanding of so many things it can only be described as madness. I have gone through the psychedelic trip after tragedy of my fathers death left bereft in this world I plunged into my own psyche and this man has a very acute way of explaining what the hell is happening with me, as i could not at the time. But i keep seeing the explanation of my tattoos in theology and wonder if unconsciously i got them to remind me of something more than i understood when i got them idk just putting thoughts down i guess 🤷♂️
Wonderful work, thank you - although I think it is curare, the powerful nerve poison you should not inhale while cooking, not so much ayahuasca
Do you have a podcast? I'd subscribe AND PAY, in a heartbeat.
Thanks.
links in the description
He just started one follow his channel here
thanks
anyone on here who contemplated watching all these lectures for free nd getting the knowledge for free but not the certificate. Did anyone go into psychology after watching these lectures? I am interested in the information but unsure as to whether I should pursue it as a career? Any thought would be helpful!! Cheers Guys
Stepharn Ramsay Music Jordan has a video called ”Psychology as a Career” that might be helpful for you.
I've used this knowledge to improve my life and to fix my relationship with my family, which is ultimately the localized goal of psychology. If you identify with the idea of bringing that process of redemption forward for as many people as possible, then go right ahead men!
I study psychology and JP helped enrich my education in this subject greatly
JBP the meta shaman !
Whoever kept sneezing and coughing ruined this lecture. They could’ve left and watched the lecture at home. Shaking my head.
13:45 - I heard that birds of prey won’t completely deplete a nest they are feasting on. Presumably because they understand the life cycle of their prey.
In Daniel’s book, Nebuchadnezzar had such an experience
Someone is coughing in every video.
Just like school with colds and stuff spreading around
1:19:40 - Some physics folks will eviscerate anyone who brings forth the notion that a "conscious observer" is required. They want to kill that idea as dead as they can possibly kill it. I think, though, this whole issue is smack in the "we really just don't know" arena. Their reasons for so vehemently opposing that notion has more to do with what they "want to believe" than it does with what is "scientifically clear." In fact, you can tell from that vehemence itself that you've pushed one of their emotional buttons.
I hope we'll get to understand these things better someday, but honestly I can't say that I have "real hope" that we will. I think some things will just prove to be "beyond science."
You using Disney analogies is so clutch in my shamanic situation since I’m dealing in my last transitional phase of the rosicrucians that’ll be another year and change of training and understanding the disorder as the disorder is brought onto me as I finished my Mason situation which Disney is a part of both orders and have a whole story behind it ... I have a unique story and I’m quite tired and this lecture and Disney helped much. It’s been almost seven years due to my ancestral background, and death for me doesn’t happen for a bit 😔 but I’m getting there. Again great lecture totally needed.
What?
Are you okay?
squirrels' gather food for later..alligators/crocodiles' storefood so it will rot....
.
Question to all of you out there. According to Dr. Peteroson, facing one's death means you shouldn't waste time. But if the acceptance of this eventual ending means also freed from the shackles of having to fill that time, then are you even wasting it? Is simply 'being' enough?
"you might be the only one thats insane like you" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 my life. I feel crazy things that I cant explain to 100% of people, even to gurus and woo-woo's they cant understand it. SO i have to hide a part of me that NO ONE, knows. Thats a tough life to live man
36:22
30:20 - 40:45
1:05:00
the individuals who are responsible for the appearance of the university's physical structures are responding to symbols being manifested by their own subconscious
52:00
Fascinating to look back on those comments at around 33 minutes in, about comics superheroes embodying or representing or updating the eternal myths. Here we are a few years later, after the woke mob took over both Marvel and DC, emasculating the hero myth and taking what used to be about Truth and Justice and classically structured adventure [which is the hero quest, underneath] - and turning it into some kind of preaching platform for sexual diversity. The comics companies are committing a massive crime against the needs and patterns of popular culture itself by corrupting the cultural icons handed down to them, supposedly to preserve and nurture to inspire future generations. I don’t mean that sexual diversity is corrupt. I mean that if you concentrate on heroes, and by implication the readers that admire them, pursuing Truth and Justice and just Defeating the Bad Guys, you should automatically get tolerance and diversity as a consequence. But turning heroes into representatives of the utterly mythical LGBTQ “movement” - as there are uncounted gay and lesbian people who want nothing to do with being “identified” with some collective “social justice” group, as they are proud in their individuality - is just pathetic. A substitute “Superman” having a "thing" about his sexuality, and getting arrested as a “social justice activist” instead of representing the best of all humanity - Jesus! (So to speak!)
Stop coughing
This is when, I started watching Jordan’s video. The sexy suave guy Always feels off to me. Not that it is, just not how, I picture him in my head. This is.
03:00
30:35 shamans!
Dr. Peterson, do you believe is possible that what gave humanity consciousness, or at least a great contributor were psycadelics? Regarding on the part when you mention that epigenetically it could be possible to alter in some way your genes. Could this changes be passed through generations? Could doing this in millions of years be one part of the answer?
Some animals are more conscious than others but we have large difference with individual variation.
Tao
How can Hieronymus Bosch be responsible for a painting from the 12th or 13th century if he lived during the 15th? 🤔
He must have taken mushrooms by the way.
2014 professor JP > 2024 Dailywire JP
Didn't the berserkers take henbane not amanita muscaria?
27:53
43:20 whats the name of the manuscript he's referencing?
🍄
Squirrels extend time into the future
I LOVE watching the older lectures when he's not conscious of what the mob can do when aroused
can someone helpe me where can i exactly find the image mr. peterson using on the backgroud? the snake on cross thing i want exactly it
Great lecture, as always, but WHO THE FUCK IS JANGLING THEIR CHANGE!
You do know it's Dr. Peterson jangling the change in his right pocket ...right? ;)
JennK777 lol thanks, I don't know why I didn't consider that, I assumed it was the cam operator. really distracting.
You didn't consider Dr. Peterson because you (we) view him as a great man, one that couldn't possibly do anything so annoying. :D But having watched many many of his videos, I think we can agree that he has an insane amount of energy ... It doesn't surprise me that he fidgets a bit.
JennK777 haha you couldn't be more right.
What is the 11th-13th century manuscript from which the Adam and Eve mushroom image comes from ... sounds like "EEBWAY" ?
~thank you for posting these lectures
At 44:35 the golden ratio?
Are sharmanics sangomas?
4:27 is there a link to this picture? Somebody? Thanks.
I FOUND IT I FINALLY FUCKING FOUND IT. sorry it took a year mate, but I was curious too so I spent like half an hour trying to find it. it's the Tree of Death and Life by Berthold Furtmeyr
0:58 Snapple?
lmao where are the " head is on the clouds " SQuad? Com ere
You need grounding. It's a shaman technique. Walk the earth hate and get out in nature
@@titan9663 yass I do dat thank u
The white light surrounding the mountain looks like a stylized breast breast FWIW
my mind is lost and i can't find the Gin or tonic, you should start a cult
The Cult of Meaning
The telling of the garden is very off here. First Eve was tempted by the serpent with a lie in the form of a question seeded with a grain of truth. "Surely you will not die?" This brought about the "eating of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil". Eve then offered this "fruit of the knowledge of good and evil" to Adam of which he partook. Then Adam kills one of Gods creations and covers Eve and himself in the skin of its flesh. Soon thereafter God arrives in the garden and calls Adam fourth to himself. Adam does not respond. I effect he is attempting to hide not only from the sight of God, but also from the consequences of his actions and disobedience. In this case his disobedience was "eating of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil". Of this thing he and the woman were forbade from for it would bring death. If you notice in the story, even this did not anger God enough to remove Adam and the woman from the Garden. So First Eve committed disobedience under a lie told to her. Then she spread the disobedience to Adam. Then Adam destroyed one of Gods creatures in the garden and put its skin on. It was not until Adam made an excuse for his actions, and did not take personal responsibility for what he had done did God become angry with him. Eve also made an excuse in blaming the serpent for her own choice. Hence all were stricken from the Garden.
how does this have any bearing on what Dr.Peterson is referring to? his logic still follows through. he paraphrases on purpose to get his point out quicker without explaining in full. i think its arrogant to belive that Dr.Peterson doesnt know the telling of genesis. pay attention to the ideology not the translation word for word.
where have you lost the fig leaf part of the myth? God gave then skins, a foretaste of the need to shed blood to rectify the state of fallen human nature which only occurred finally and permanently through the crucifixion of the innocent son of God.
1:04:00
24:00
19:01