You all need to stop being so rude and ignorant. While some of these are sold so high for the actual art, a lot are also so expensive because of their historical significance. It’s like saying a dinosaur bone is worthless because everyone has bones. It’s not about the simple, physical worth of the paintings.
Why is Francis Bacon 3 work studies of Lucien Frued piece that sold for +$140mill not listed, plus other works that sold for +$100mill? I have lost faith that this is an accurate representation of art sales at auction, have a word with yourselves.
Beyond what has been sold, paintings with highest estimated value are La Gioconda and Guernica, at around $3,000 million each, being Guernica much cheaper per square inch 😆. As those are not for sell in the foreseeable future, that value is estimated from what some reputed institutions say they would pay if those paintings were for sell. (Not considering Fresco arts, Lascaux, Altamira, etc... !!) I guess that a single crop of the Altamira paints (35,000 years ago) has much, much more value than any art made in the last 5 millennia. Still... we cannot say an economic value of these, it would be vandalizing that art.
no it’s not do u know why portrait exists though we have hd cameras better than human eye because they capture image as it as not how human mind perceive it yeah you are though pricing in thousands would be better rather than millions but again those businesses man who do not even appreciate art buy them for social symbol leading to a vicious cycle of price hiking
I'm going to start selling my artwork I drew complicated flags very very very hard and I did a good job cover the whole paper also I got the right proportions and it's going to be expensive millions of dollars when I get the money I will buy a abandoned high school and turn it to my home I'm Serious :)
Yes, this is the exact top, I also have this top on my channel......... I analyzed different sources to compile the exact top, but you made a 10 grade video👍 many videos of the same quality 😇
His most famous work the nightwatch has never been sold and is a national treasure that belongs to the people. Someone offered 500 million euro's over 25 years ago thus with inflation well over a billion and it wasn't even concidered. So you can't put a pricetag on it..
@@chrissibersky4617 idk man try to get a large canvas and create les femmes d'alger, dora maar au chat, le reve, from scratch and make it look the way his does, plus he pulled those images out of nowhere, we get the advantage of copying his. he was truly a total master of drawing and painting as far as skill, then he just went his own creative direction and made what he felt. it's such a personal thing art though, some will look ugly or some you'd never hang in your house or a museum maybe, but you gotta respect his drawing/painting skill. if anything, if you see his as ugly, then that should just help you discover the direction you want to go to make something truly beautiful and better, and not the direction he went
@@CodCats I understand Picasso's paintings. I know that he is a master at painting and has invented revolutionary ways of depicting things. The result is still looking objectivity ugly and infantile. But I know why some people love it. It's like with a very high end and expensive meal. They're not always supposed to taste good, it's the experience of colliding tastes and the journey through the meal.
So i wanted to understand why does Rothko's no. 6 worth 186 million dollars: It's size is 238.8 x 145.1 cm (94 x 57 in) "Rothko wasn’t big on titles. He liked to let his paintings speak for themselves. That’s why No. 6 doesn’t have a fancy name - just a number and some colors. It’s like he wanted you to come up with your own story" I'm actually getting sick of these meaningless articles, so after all i just opened the painting on a new tab and started to thing about why does he painted it this way. I think the violet stands for the blue sky, the green is the ground seems pretty simple till the red part. The red probably is the expression of the emotions and it's effect you see the world that's why the red covers the violet and the green parts. "Have you ever stood in front of a painting and felt like you were being swallowed whole? That’s what Rothko wanted. He painted his pieces big because he wanted you to feel them, not just see them." It's price definitely depends on it's size because if it would be smaller it would loss it's charm, otherwise we all can imagine this painting in a sceene where a billionaire stands before the painting, drinking a glass of red wine and for him the painting has the meaning of being rich and in this case only those people understands that "rich" feeling who has a huge piece of art hanging on the wall in a minimalistic room. It's might sounds stupid, but these painting showing the prestige of the person who owns it. Personally my favourite artists are Rembrandt and Dürer, i'd like to own a copy of their etchings just to see all the details of their masterpieces. But watching Rothko's paintings you can't really speak about details, you can try to figure out what's the meaning behind the colours, but you don't know if there's any...
@@mjpndt123 pollock was a spy, rothko wanted to make millionaires enclosed in their own creation. their works are still beautiful, as they are representing problems.
What's with Malevich's Suprematist Competition? And Amadeo Modigliani's paintings were like early Playboy Magazine covers 😂 and those of Willem De Kooning? David Hockney's a simple one, Andy Warhol? Okay, iconic, but hardly a masterpiece, the same for Roy Lichtenstein that's very much like comic drawings, and Mark Rothko with those colors? I guess, they're okay paintings, but not worth those gigantic price, imho. But the rest of the paintings shown in this list, they're all great, and well deserved (yes, even those few of Picasso's, abstract and cubism).
Best Painting in World is 'The Dali' at Glasgow City Art Gallery and Museum: Christ on Cross hanging over the Sea of Galilee by Salvador Dali, 7 years ago reported Spanish Govt offered £100 Mil - $130 Mil then - for it as the city had to settle a large cash settlement .
There is one big problem here and that is that there is no comparison of the size of these paintings. Some Picasso's are really big, the Pollock and Rothco are hugh. The size of a painting matters. Also they all look a little bit bland. The scream really pops out of the painting, just like Vincent van Gogh paintings. The high prizes for the paintings is due to the ridiculous prizes middle eastern countries are willing to pay for a lot of art, just to display them in there musea. Some paintings are really not the best work from a lot of these artists. The best works are already in musea all over the world, so they have to do with the scraps. Although I have to admit that the Emperator mundi and the scream are beautiful works of art. And I always liked Pollock. If you really want to know more about painters and art, I can recommend: The private life of a masterpiece and Simon Schama's power of art. These two series are in English and are available as BBC dvd's.
A lot of these paintings if you say that it was dribbled by kids, which by the way it looks like it, nobody will pay attention to it, then put 50m + price tag to it?! 😅😮
We should do everything to avoid this historical-cultural damage. This is not a Leonardo and Carlo Pedretti, the leading expert on Leonardo, said it clearly. It would be enough, among other things, to read the treatise on painting and observe Leonardo's paintings to understand what can or cannot be attributed to Leonrdo. What is most displeasing is therefore what we could fully define as "the disfigurement of Leonardo's work" which will be handed down to future generations with the addition of incorrect elements which will probably no longer be possible to remove. People continue and will continue to participate, unaware, in this grotesque situation in which someone would absurdly like to attribute this expressionless passport photo to Leonardo. In this, I repeat, Leonardo, art and culture are decidedly distorted. Why do we continue to do this?
Too much money in the hands of too few, gullible people. However, it is probably better to look at these items rather than an A4 bank statement containing the same amount😅
If someone is willing to pay those prices why should anyone complain? For every painting that brings those kinds of paintings there are thousands that never bring in anything. Who knows why some make it and some don’t?
Horrible paintings and many are worse than a 7 year old...I find a lot of his paintings bizarrely weird and nothing special at all...All the paintings I saw on the list I wouldn't have paid 50 dollars for...And this is what the rich spend their money on these stupid ass painting...Absolutely Nuts
Whoever is willing to pay these prices must have more money than sense. Young school children could produce paintings better than those of Hockney and Van Gogh. For REAL works of art, requiring proper skill checkout The Lady of Shallot by John William Waterhouse or the works of Edmund Blair Leighton.
The human body, even in paintings, must be look dressed, not nude, not like if they were sexual objects, but with purity, moral and decency. Repent and believe in the gospel of Jesus, the Son of God, the Messiah.
The title should be: Most expensive money laundering ever done.
🤫🚔
where is starry night and Mona Lisa
Has Mona Lisa been sold?
She is never been sold! It is estimated at over 800 million.
@@Louderboy.
Yeah. That's what I thought.
Monalisa and last supper never sold
@@Louderboy. mona lisa's value is 2.5 billion
I love the "Claude Monet" by Maule, one of my favorite painters.
You all need to stop being so rude and ignorant. While some of these are sold so high for the actual art, a lot are also so expensive because of their historical significance. It’s like saying a dinosaur bone is worthless because everyone has bones. It’s not about the simple, physical worth of the paintings.
Most of these are garbage that I wouldn't hang in an outhouse.
Rothko, 186 million dollars for that? Something a kid could paint? There is no end to the stupidity of humanity.
Ikr its so stupid
Your understanding of art is in kids level
@@musicalpicasso and you are ?
@@musicalpicassolndeed only you art lover have that genius of understanding it
@@androidtv8114 yes
Why is Francis Bacon 3 work studies of Lucien Frued piece that sold for +$140mill not listed, plus other works that sold for +$100mill?
I have lost faith that this is an accurate representation of art sales at auction, have a word with yourselves.
Thank you for doing this Video!
where is Cy Twombly?
Hack
Beyond what has been sold, paintings with highest estimated value are La Gioconda and Guernica, at around $3,000 million each, being Guernica much cheaper per square inch 😆. As those are not for sell in the foreseeable future, that value is estimated from what some reputed institutions say they would pay if those paintings were for sell. (Not considering Fresco arts, Lascaux, Altamira, etc... !!) I guess that a single crop of the Altamira paints (35,000 years ago) has much, much more value than any art made in the last 5 millennia. Still... we cannot say an economic value of these, it would be vandalizing that art.
My drawing when i was 2 years old could have been sold for 186 million dollars? DANG IT
Where is the worlds most famous painter, Rembrandt? Who made this list lol? Most of this stuff is not worth the paint used!
Some things are not for sale.
Nachwacht and Mona Lisa are such things.
either i am stupid or the pricing is stupid
no it’s not
do u know why portrait exists though we have hd cameras better than human eye because they capture image as it as not how human mind perceive it
yeah you are though pricing in thousands would be better rather than millions but again those businesses man who do not even appreciate art buy them for social symbol leading to a vicious cycle of price hiking
Same thinking 🤔
The latter 💯
utterly nuts - beautiful work, but really - Warhol and Hockney?
You mean "udderly". So many woman with their breasts out.
>>> agreed! Warhols such a poseur! a fraud
if you dont know art you shoudnt talk about it publicly because you just embarrase yourself
@@musicalpicasso Then explain genius, instead of appealing to mystery
@@androidtv8114 no
I'm going to start selling my artwork I drew complicated flags very very very hard and I did a good job cover the whole paper also I got the right proportions and it's going to be expensive millions of dollars when I get the money I will buy a abandoned high school and turn it to my home I'm Serious :)
Yes, this is the exact top, I also have this top on my channel......... I analyzed different sources to compile the exact top, but you made a 10 grade video👍 many videos of the same quality 😇
What a beautiful presented video... I'll take the Scream & 2 Picasso to be named later!!!!😉😉😉😉
No starry night or did I miss it?
its in a museum
No Rembrandt van Rijn Paintings?
His most famous work the nightwatch has never been sold and is a national treasure that belongs to the people. Someone offered 500 million euro's over 25 years ago thus with inflation well over a billion and it wasn't even concidered. So you can't put a pricetag on it..
Why picasso is so expensive? I dont understanf it looks like a 3month old baby paint it
I agree, most overrated trash
A lot of the richest people are ugly inside and they mirror themselves in Picasso's paintings.
I once copied his art and showed to my friend, they said "stop drawing like baby". I laughed so hard. 🤣🤣
@@chrissibersky4617 idk man try to get a large canvas and create les femmes d'alger, dora maar au chat, le reve, from scratch and make it look the way his does, plus he pulled those images out of nowhere, we get the advantage of copying his. he was truly a total master of drawing and painting as far as skill, then he just went his own creative direction and made what he felt. it's such a personal thing art though, some will look ugly or some you'd never hang in your house or a museum maybe, but you gotta respect his drawing/painting skill. if anything, if you see his as ugly, then that should just help you discover the direction you want to go to make something truly beautiful and better, and not the direction he went
@@CodCats
I understand Picasso's paintings. I know that he is a master at painting and has invented revolutionary ways of depicting things. The result is still looking objectivity ugly and infantile.
But I know why some people love it. It's like with a very high end and expensive meal. They're not always supposed to taste good, it's the experience of colliding tastes and the journey through the meal.
Gewaschenes Geld für einen inneren Kreis.
If "Storm on the Sea of Galilee" ever came up for sale, I bet it would outprice any of these.
What if vincent had this much money of his paintings?
.
So i wanted to understand why does Rothko's no. 6 worth 186 million dollars:
It's size is 238.8 x 145.1 cm (94 x 57 in)
"Rothko wasn’t big on titles. He liked to let his paintings speak for themselves. That’s why No. 6 doesn’t have a fancy name - just a number and some colors. It’s like he wanted you to come up with your own story" I'm actually getting sick of these meaningless articles, so after all i just opened the painting on a new tab and started to thing about why does he painted it this way.
I think the violet stands for the blue sky, the green is the ground seems pretty simple till the red part. The red probably is the expression of the emotions and it's effect you see the world that's why the red covers the violet and the green parts.
"Have you ever stood in front of a painting and felt like you were being swallowed whole? That’s what Rothko wanted. He painted his pieces big because he wanted you to feel them, not just see them."
It's price definitely depends on it's size because if it would be smaller it would loss it's charm, otherwise we all can imagine this painting in a sceene where a billionaire stands before the painting, drinking a glass of red wine and for him the painting has the meaning of being rich and in this case only those people understands that "rich" feeling who has a huge piece of art hanging on the wall in a minimalistic room.
It's might sounds stupid, but these painting showing the prestige of the person who owns it.
Personally my favourite artists are Rembrandt and Dürer, i'd like to own a copy of their etchings just to see all the details of their masterpieces. But watching Rothko's paintings you can't really speak about details, you can try to figure out what's the meaning behind the colours, but you don't know if there's any...
You need to see a Rothko live to understand, i know i did.
Rich people like ugly things. A reflection of their souls.
🤣🤣🤣🤣These art pieces are really ugly for sure
Uncultured people have no souls.
Other than the rothko and pollock, these are all beautiful and skilled
@@mjpndt123 pollock was a spy, rothko wanted to make millionaires enclosed in their own creation.
their works are still beautiful, as they are representing problems.
And the masterpiece of the banana held to the canvas with ducting tape sold for nine million dollars recently!
Cuánto valdría Las meninas , Guernica o la mona lisa ?
The saddest thing is, Van Gogh only sold 1 painting in his entire life.
Las pinturas de Velázquez, Rembrant, Goya , Miguel Angelo ... De los verdaderos grandes debe ser incalculable
En Retrato de Juan de Pareja de Velazquez se vendió a NY.
No recuerdo por cuánto, y no aparece en este video
What's with Malevich's Suprematist Competition? And Amadeo Modigliani's paintings were like early Playboy Magazine covers 😂 and those of Willem De Kooning? David Hockney's a simple one, Andy Warhol? Okay, iconic, but hardly a masterpiece, the same for Roy Lichtenstein that's very much like comic drawings, and Mark Rothko with those colors? I guess, they're okay paintings, but not worth those gigantic price, imho.
But the rest of the paintings shown in this list, they're all great, and well deserved (yes, even those few of Picasso's, abstract and cubism).
Caravaggio> Picasso
Best Painting in World is 'The Dali' at Glasgow City Art Gallery and Museum: Christ on Cross hanging over the Sea of Galilee by Salvador Dali, 7 years ago reported Spanish Govt offered £100 Mil - $130 Mil then - for it as the city had to settle a large cash settlement .
where is mona lisa?
Hasn't been sold in modern times, and unlikely to ever be for sale in the future. I've heard insurance values at $1 billion for it, but who knows.
You won't find any Michelangelo paintings either. A drawing goes for 20-30 millions. Paintings are never sold.
Where's the 3D exactly?
Leonardo Salvatore Mundi 400M not 450M by Christie’s
I think i could paint something like that and sell billions😂
No Caravaggio! HAHAHA
There is one big problem here and that is that there is no comparison of the size of these paintings. Some Picasso's are really big, the Pollock and Rothco are hugh. The size of a painting matters. Also they all look a little bit bland. The scream really pops out of the painting, just like Vincent van Gogh paintings.
The high prizes for the paintings is due to the ridiculous prizes middle eastern countries are willing to pay for a lot of art, just to display them in there musea. Some paintings are really not the best work from a lot of these artists. The best works are already in musea all over the world, so they have to do with the scraps. Although I have to admit that the Emperator mundi and the scream are beautiful works of art. And I always liked Pollock.
If you really want to know more about painters and art, I can recommend: The private life of a masterpiece and Simon Schama's power of art. These two series are in English and are available as BBC dvd's.
ซัลวาตอร์ มุนดี กำแพงร้องไห้ ปิระมิด... ราคาที่ต้องบินเหนือเมฆ..ครับ ป.ล.ยังไม่รวม "ปิเอตะ " มารีย์ & เยซู...ลายเส้น แวนโก๊ะ ครับ
I just don’t understand why these are worth that much?
What is this?
« Le sauveur du monde » nous avait averti… l’heure est venue Merci❤
That’s because Picasso was drunk most of the time
Nemmeno un Caravaggio??
Why not picaso
Color and tone diffrent as i seen
Art Is Not More Important Than Life.
Im sorry i can t afford it!!!Can we make a better deal or offer or discount or whatever...?💰💲💶💰🤔😊
I have paintings picasso original
ร๊อดชิลด์ 3 แท่ง(หินอ่อนไม้กางเขนพร้อมชิ้นสีอิฐ " ที่ไม่ธรรมดา ครับ ❤😂🎉
A lot of these paintings if you say that it was dribbled by kids, which by the way it looks like it, nobody will pay attention to it, then put 50m + price tag to it?! 😅😮
It's because you know nothing about art.
Total foolishness. Garbage i wouldnt pay ten bucks for. Paint by number kits
😂😂😂😂
1:33 I have the potential to be worth 80 million?
I got a picture by lord lucan was offered a grand but kept it
หรือภาพกำแพงร้องไห้.. 10 ภาพ 10 หินอ่อนแกะสลัก... ฟรี. มีค่ารับรองทางไกล.ครับ 🛰⚡ทนายอ้น... ✍🤳🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼🖼
Des fois je me dis qu'il faut que je me mettre à la peinture...
Mona Lisa ?
Never sold-- in a museum
We should do everything to avoid this historical-cultural damage. This is not a Leonardo and Carlo Pedretti, the leading expert on Leonardo, said it clearly. It would be enough, among other things, to read the treatise on painting and observe Leonardo's paintings to understand what can or cannot be attributed to Leonrdo. What is most displeasing is therefore what we could fully define as "the disfigurement of Leonardo's work" which will be handed down to future generations with the addition of incorrect elements which will probably no longer be possible to remove. People continue and will continue to participate, unaware, in this grotesque situation in which someone would absurdly like to attribute this expressionless passport photo to Leonardo. In this, I repeat, Leonardo, art and culture are decidedly distorted. Why do we continue to do this?
Too much money in the hands of too few, gullible people.
However, it is probably better to look at these items rather than an A4 bank statement containing the same amount😅
Seen more masterful art in comics.
Mark Rothko No.6 😂😂😂😂😂 humanity i tell you.
You know what i think is funny, when people who dont understand art open their mouth about art 🤡
@@musicalpicassoMaybe only geniuses like you have that superpower
@@androidtv8114maybe if you actually do something from your life. But rather here you are
@@SeanAnthony-j7f what are you doing then?
...No paintings by the great Salvadore Dali???
The ‘Leonardo’ Christ is not by Leonardo.
Every willed de Kooning painting seemed like it was drawn by a 4 year old.
Seriously that has to be money laundering.
Of all the paintings in this list his strike me as the most hideous.
some paintings are stunning beyond words..but..1:38 no way I'm paying 85 mil for a bunch of blocks rotated in microsoft paint....
That's the thing it's like Microsoft paint but is actually a painting 😂😂😂
Nah bro the Mona Lisa the most expensive painting in the world
So when was it sold?
Van gogh champ the best but man color not harmonized
Basquiat skull
Vincent van Gogh the best painter
what kind of Art is this!!! what kind of money paid for this shit!!! shitty damn world
Definitely a spot of money laundering going on throughout the art history community….
Great paintings… true classics… the prices just show its just pieces of paper!
its mind blowing to me how shitty most of these actually are.. boy, rarity though, puts a price on a pile of dog crap 🤣
It's because you don't know art. That's ok. To each their own.
The art would needs brains I have see better kids painting truly
Out of date hockney in there now
If someone is willing to pay those prices why should anyone complain? For every painting that brings those kinds of paintings there are thousands that never bring in anything. Who knows why some make it and some don’t?
Ovviamente da questa classifica sono escluse le migliaia di tele dal valore inestimabile esposte nelle chiese e nei monumenti storici italiani.
SUNT CURIOS CAT AR COSTA TABLOUL PRIMAVARA SI VENUS AL LUI BOTTICELLI.
Only a couple of non- primitive style paintings... 🙈
KRACKENFRAU 1998
Millions for a stupid painting..😂😂😂. What a joke…
Kein Bild der ist soviel Wert 😢
The world is so Delusional
La sobreestimación del arte.
Y este video demuestra lo absurda y podrida que es nuestra sociedad.
Some of those paintings don't look great at all.
Picasso is overated seems like bunch of nonsense half the time
Horrible paintings and many are worse than a 7 year old...I find a lot of his paintings bizarrely weird and nothing special at all...All the paintings I saw on the list I wouldn't have paid 50 dollars for...And this is what the rich spend their money on these stupid ass painting...Absolutely Nuts
You don't understand art
Exactly, to you its nonsense because your understanding of art is have no sense.
@@musicalpicasso No one wants to understand madeup pretentious BS
@@soujanyoghosh9174 then tell me how do you differentiate legit from non sensical art
Don’t worry.Iz just prizes for the über rich snåts’ to feel themselves even richer.It doesn’t matter.At all✨☝🏼
I will be on this list
No you wont.
Thank you. Sit and watch
@@MrIrons-og3rg just kidding, good luck to your goals man, you have the right attitude. 👍
I knew you were joking. I am a Jamaican. Take good care.
My student can draw better than some of them😂😂😂
italians do it better
Jackson went hardddddd
According to my family of artists van gogh is by far the greatest
Whoever is willing to pay these prices must have more money than sense. Young school children could produce paintings better than those of Hockney and Van Gogh.
For REAL works of art, requiring proper skill checkout The Lady of Shallot by John William Waterhouse or the works of Edmund Blair Leighton.
None interested me. Only non clever human can appreciate it
Art market and legends of art are not about what intress you
The human body, even in paintings, must be look dressed, not nude, not like if they were sexual objects, but with purity, moral and decency. Repent and believe in the gospel of Jesus, the Son of God, the Messiah.
Italy wins🎉
Picasso and few others aren't that worthy.
And what do you know about art?
@@nathalie_desrosiers Sorry for hurting. I don't know anything.
some of them are really pieces of sh!t
FRIDA KAHLO and Mona Lisa what happened
Cateva sunt mizerii