Why “The Apocalypse of Peter” Isn't Included in the New Testament Canon - Dr. Bart Ehrman

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @demasculine
    @demasculine 11 месяцев назад +4

    its part of Ethiopian Orthodox cannon

  • @AIphilosophy101
    @AIphilosophy101 Год назад

    Noumena, Phenomena and Truth, all intermingle. As Paul is said to have written "those who have faith without seeing" will be greater than him in Heaven. Indeed seeing is believing, all else is faithfulness. I copy it's very difficult to believe in conjectures posited anywhere, without seeing. What else but to keep looking?

  • @johnnyllooddte3415
    @johnnyllooddte3415 Год назад +6

    CHRIST died to save everyone,, but everyone is not saved

    • @allwillberevealed777
      @allwillberevealed777 Год назад

      A "white" man died for everyone?
      🤨

    • @trappedcat3615
      @trappedcat3615 Год назад

      So then it is of him that wills and him that runs, and not God that shows mercy? That contradicts Romans 9-11

    • @lonnkon
      @lonnkon Год назад +6

      @@trappedcat3615 the mercy of god is being patient with u and not killing u in an instant for transgressing his laws
      for he loves every soul and is longsuffering, in hope of our repentance

    • @mattv2057
      @mattv2057 5 месяцев назад +1

      Psalms 7:11 god is angry with the wicked everyday. We cannot continue in sin after the rebirth. We can lose our salvation
      Faith without works is dead. There are requirements to gain access to everlasting even after Jesus

    • @trappedcat3615
      @trappedcat3615 2 месяца назад +1

      ​​@@mattv2057 Faith without works does not mean Faith without you working for your salvation. You are trusting in yourself and not Christ. Your hope is your unsure merit and not in his sure grace. True Faith looks to Christ alone for salvation and it works because of His love, not to merit salvation.

  • @JeanRausis
    @JeanRausis Год назад +13

    Definitely not written by Peter, and has a silly way of describing the crucifixion, plus is one of the sources Mohamed used for the Coran.

    • @gravityfallscanada
      @gravityfallscanada Год назад +2

      If you actually read the thing. The last sentence says the Peter came to his senses... Thus this was just a vision...
      There's nothing wrong with this. Plus the Apocalypse of Peter was going to be added to the final canon, but was rejected at the last min for the book of Revelation.

    • @TheBaconWizard
      @TheBaconWizard Год назад

      All of them were definitely not written by the person who's name was later attributed. And Mohammed used what the Christians in his local area and time used. They no longer exist as a sect however.

    • @gravityfallscanada
      @gravityfallscanada Год назад

      @@TheBaconWizard
      I beg to differ. The Acts of Thomas and Peter could have easily been written by their written authors.

    • @joanneg7646
      @joanneg7646 Год назад

      @@TheBaconWizard according to Bart that no true

    • @TheBaconWizard
      @TheBaconWizard Год назад +1

      @@gravityfallscanada Utter piffle. They were CENTURIES later and written by NON JEWS ffs.

  • @TBD3.0
    @TBD3.0 Год назад +1

    Pick uP^ The Nag Hammed Scriptures Thee Revised and Updated Translation Of Sacred Gnostic Text Complete In One Volume - Edited by Marvin Meyer - Advisory Board Wolf - Peter Funk , Paul - Hubert Poitier, James M. Robinson.
    Read it for yourself.