Proactive Transition In CQB

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 янв 2025

Комментарии •

  • @SPCWELLS7
    @SPCWELLS7 3 года назад +12

    I had honestly never thought about the idea of keeping at least one gun up at all times during the transition to make sure your sector is still covered while going to your secondary. Always having a muzzle pointed towards the threat. I love it. I'm going to dry fire practice this later today. Thank you!

  • @joeyjo34
    @joeyjo34 2 года назад

    What gun is that I have been looking for so long

  • @tetrakosarihondaturbo2810
    @tetrakosarihondaturbo2810 5 лет назад +2

    Σωστοοοοος ο παιχτης!

  • @bandogmerch
    @bandogmerch 3 года назад +2

    Yeah; but would the long be inoperable...? So why re-engage it...?

    • @tornad8063
      @tornad8063 2 года назад +6

      This was change to pistol because long gun woukd be unwieldly, where we want to go. Not because of main gun being unoperative

  • @dudedoingdude
    @dudedoingdude 5 лет назад +2

    His posture is charming when he leans on the shelf from 2:20. 😎

  • @vladimir_ckau
    @vladimir_ckau 5 лет назад +14

    Please, add some audio post-production. It's one of the easiest to fix yet supreme issues that should be dead somewhere in 2010's - volume level that differs from overall volume levels of other videos on YT (and games, software, music app, add your thing here...)
    It's easy, guys. Limiter, compressor, noise reduction, done.

  • @importantname
    @importantname 5 лет назад +2

    ok good

  • @yosefbenbarouk
    @yosefbenbarouk 4 года назад +1

    cool!

  • @alexandrugheorghiceanu4178
    @alexandrugheorghiceanu4178 5 лет назад

    WHERE IS MY NUCLEAR ⚛ BOMB 🍬

  • @alexandrugheorghiceanu4178
    @alexandrugheorghiceanu4178 5 лет назад +1

    His GOING studii after this video 📼 that îs made By him!

  • @gabriel-xk1bg
    @gabriel-xk1bg 5 лет назад

    Just mistakes in this video

    • @ProjectGecko
      @ProjectGecko  5 лет назад +14

      Please list those.

    • @jeanrabelclervil7746
      @jeanrabelclervil7746 5 лет назад +2

      May you let us see or understand them ?

    • @ProjectGecko
      @ProjectGecko  5 лет назад +10

      Anything?

    • @peterhagtharp4263
      @peterhagtharp4263 4 года назад +2

      What a troll.

    • @bmac2300
      @bmac2300 3 года назад +2

      ​@@ProjectGecko I am late to this party. I just discovered your video series. I have found them incredibly rich in content and wish to extend my personal thanks (whatever that is worth) for your willingness to put this on a free platform like YT. This is the first video where I saw a portion that did not make sense to me. Its not an indictment on anything Eli has explained or taught......its just inconsistent with Eli's clear eyed approach to efficiency. It is something whereby, if I were in class and saw this, I would press Eli. When working transition from rifle to pistol in this example, its clear Eli initiates his grip on his pistol. This is where he states, "if you see a threat emerge, you can easily transition back to the rifle." Why? That seems demonstrably inefficient. If your hand is already in positioned on the pistol with positive grip......skin and use the secondary.....don't try to reengage your primary. Especially because Eli safed the primary and has a striker fire secondary. My point would be doubly true at the distance shown on the video. If the counter is "the video is just to demonstrate the concept....the entry way could be a further distance than shown." Then you should not be transitioning to a secondary platform unless there is no more ammunition for the primary platform. In no way does it detract from the essence of what Eli is demonstrating here......its just I would want to know the "why?"