Woodcraft - Board Game Review - Pinocchio's Demon Workshop

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 июл 2024
  • Woodcraft - Board Game Review - Pinocchio's Demon Workshop
    Once you get over comprehending why demonic Pinocchio puppets are crafting things out of wood, is Woodcraft a solid Euro or perhaps a bit too tight for its own good?
    In Woodcraft, you play as forest people running competing workshops in the woods, with you gathering wood and crafting goods for your customers. Along the way, you hire helpers, improve your workshop, and buy different types of wood and other tools to create the best workshop you can.
    During the game, players complete their projects with wood (dice) that can be cut down to size, glued back together, and adjusted using dice manipulation to be as efficient as possible with their resources.
    Whoever builds the best, most successful workshop wins
    ***************************************
    SUBSCRIBE ► / @thebrokenmeeple
    KIENDA SPONSOR REFERRAL LINK
    The Broken Meeple is happy to be sponsored by Kienda.co.uk where you can buy great games at great prices from a warehouse local to where I live!
    If you register an account on their website using my referral link and/or code you can get 5% discount on your first order over £60. And for every referral link used, the channel has greater access to further review copies for more content on the channel!
    kienda.co.uk/brokenmeeple
    Referral Code:
    02610323
    RENT SHUFFLE AND ROLL REFERRAL LINK
    Gain 50% off your first month renting board games at RENT, SHUFFLE & ROLL at:
    rentshuffleandroll.co.uk/
    Code: - BrokenMeeple50
    ***************************************
    Related Content
    Welcome To My Channel (Who I Am) ► • The Broken Meeple Welc...
    Oathsworn Review ► • Oathsworn: Into the De...
    Crowdfunding October 2022 ► • October 2022 Kickstart...
    Top 100 (10-1) ► • Top 100 Board Games of...
    ***************************************
    Who Am I?
    One single batchelor from the UK talking about his passion for board games and the people who play them! I support small content creators, board game cafes and go against the status quo when it comes to the board game industry. I give my honest opinions without bias towards any publishers or designers and will not hold back if I don't like a game.
    The Broken Meeple is a variety channel that hosts all kinds of board game content from reviews to Top 10 lists to playthroughs to live stream collaborations with special guests (predominantly small channels who deserve more exposure).
    I look forward to engaging with you, the community on my live streams or in the comments on my videos!
    ***************************************
    Timestamps:
    00:00 - Introduction and Promo
    00:58 - Background and General Overview
    03:45 - Only 13 Actions, This Is Tight!
    05:57 - Fairly Elegant for Delicious Games
    07:43 - Components (What Kind of Sick World Is This?)
    09:16 - Action Wheel Is Solid If Not Original
    10:04 - Problems With The Swing of Card Options
    13:52 - Same Issue With Helpers
    15:07 - No Real Player Interaction So Why Not Solo?
    17:39 - Public Contracts
    20:09 - Summary and Verdict
    #brokenmeeple #dicetower #watchitplayed #boardgames #boardgame #boardgamingramblings #supportsmallcreators #tabletop #tabletopgames #woodcraft #boardgamer #boardgamereview
    ***************************************
    Useful Links
    Become a Patreon ► / thebrokenmeeple
    Facebook ► / thebrokenmeeple
    Twitter ► / thebrokenmeeple
    Instagram ► / thebrokenmeeple
    Podcast ► / luke-hector-broken-meeple
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 51

  • @amchasteenable
    @amchasteenable Год назад +1

    Great review! Love the honesty. I appreciate the simple house rule suggestions.

  • @draheim90
    @draheim90 Год назад +3

    Thanks for the review!
    Was really looking forward to this one, and am especially looking forward to hearing your thoughts on Atiwa and the new Caverna expansion if/when you get to them :).

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад +1

      Won't be too long before I can review Attiwa - i'll be teaching Paul Grogan on his channel this Friday if you want to watch.

  • @bookaddict777
    @bookaddict777 Год назад +1

    Thanks for the review, Luke. I will hold off on getting this one as I was looking at it chiefly for solo play.

  • @sarareed6897
    @sarareed6897 Год назад

    Thank you, Luke. This one I’d need to play before buying. As always, I really appreciate your candor.

  • @filipeverissimo444
    @filipeverissimo444 Год назад

    Thank you for the honest review! Just played it and I totally agree with you.What bother me most is the lack of interaction, and the fact that it feels like the game plays you

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад

      This game heavily plays you. Those cards dictate your whole game.

  • @Sarah-wn8kz
    @Sarah-wn8kz Год назад

    I love your videos. When I hesitate for a game I always listen to your opinion. You always say the bad thing about it and it helps take a real decision. Sometimes I dont agree or Im like « he’s right but I dont mind that » and it helps a lot decide if a game is or is not for me! Thanks you for your honest opinion. I really do apreciate it! ☺️☺️

  • @ryangallagher7183
    @ryangallagher7183 Год назад +1

    Thank you for another great video. I love Praga, which you think is just okay. I also love Paladins, which you think is just okay. So my takeaway here is that I will love Woodcraft, haha.

  • @Feldingor
    @Feldingor Год назад

    I was hoping for a harsher review Luke, so I would be more convinced to get it 😂 Now you left me undecided 😂😂😂

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад

      ;-) What does your wallet tell you?

    • @Feldingor
      @Feldingor Год назад +3

      @@TheBrokenMeeple that I should have stopped buying boardgames a long time ago 😂

  • @DumiduSurasinghe
    @DumiduSurasinghe Год назад +1

    Thanks again for a good analysis. With budgets being what they are these days, I would rather save for an excellent game, not simply a good one.

  • @catherinetaylor556
    @catherinetaylor556 Год назад

    Have you got a new camera, lighting, set-up. The focus and lighting in this video are top notch in my opinion - really clear and sharp

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад +1

      Nope, just learning to fine tune it as I go. I think the new table helps also as the wood is a lighter stain. It reflects the light a lot better.

    • @catherinetaylor556
      @catherinetaylor556 Год назад

      @@TheBrokenMeeple well it looks great

  • @hairygnome1787
    @hairygnome1787 Год назад +1

    Hi Luke, good useful video as always. Your criticisms all seem fair enough, and I must say I am a bit on the fence with this one.
    On a general note, you mention it being very tight, and 60% of voting BGG users view the weight as 4 (medium heavy)... I am not sure I like it when relatively heavy, complex or tight games have a cutesy box cover . It just seems inappropriate (e.g. dungeon petz) and I am unsure why it is done. It runs the risk that buyers who do not spend hours researching on BGG or watching reviews may make a bad purchase, assuming a game to be more suited to youngsters than it is (or at least to be a more 'fun' or lighthearted game than it is ) and I would like to think that isn't what the publishers are hoping will happen

  • @TheBigCrab89
    @TheBigCrab89 Год назад

    I ended with very similar thoughts on this one! Potential to be great but ultimately ended up feeling good/ok... Some cool ideas but too tight for my tastes.

  • @b67us
    @b67us Год назад

    demonic.... you are right sir
    thanks Luke, You are Great as always...👍

  • @ddolgov
    @ddolgov Год назад

    "Demonic" setting notwithstanding, it's worth mentioning that every single card has a different artwork, unlike 90% of recently released games. On top of that, many order cards are quite whimsical with lots of quicky details

  • @stevenamamoto585
    @stevenamamoto585 Год назад

    I’ve found Suchy’s games too tight for my liking. Still own Pragna and Underwater Cities ,but they get passed by for other games .

  • @fongstar
    @fongstar Год назад

    Lol the comments on the artwork is classic.

  • @squeekmyster
    @squeekmyster Год назад

    Played our first game this evening, it felt like their are standard openings that need to be followed.
    Too much feels like it's geared around the Blue Berry income, and that felt a little bit of a shame.

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад

      Hands down you need income or you're going to struggle period. It doesn't have enough rounds in it to allow for any slips, bad moves or bad luck.

  • @michieltummers1303
    @michieltummers1303 Год назад

    I really like this game, but at the same time i fully understand your criticism. With regards to the open scoring cards, i really like your solution. I also think that a 1/2 player score board which swipes 3/4 cards each income fase would be a great asset to resolve your criticism. Would that be a good solution according to you? 🙂

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад +1

      It would certainly help, but it wouldn't take the game from a 7 to a 10!

    • @michieltummers1303
      @michieltummers1303 Год назад

      @@TheBrokenMeeple ofc not, but maybe an elevation to an eight would be possible.

  • @jamescartwright1150
    @jamescartwright1150 Год назад

    Maybe the game is set in the world of the 1978 movie Magic? 😉🙂

  • @shayanaminnjad5354
    @shayanaminnjad5354 9 месяцев назад

    The middle part about helpers and orders was so negative that I almost decided to skip the game! But after playing it I think they are good.
    The order problem you mentioned (they don't have what you need) only happens with the tools. No other aspects of the game are so dependent on the orders. I think in a single game you'll see enough orders. If you want to go for the tools objective, I think you should go for it in the late game, during the game you can enjoy their rewards, because you get them as side effects of your main actions, and they won't hurt you.
    About helpers, while luck plays a role, I think four of them should always provide you with interesting choices.
    And the helper which grants you 2 reputations is pretty expensive and won't give you anything else other than reputation, on the other hand the contract will give you money, end game points, and probably some extra immediate points. I think you'll get enough for the extra labor!
    Other than that part I think the review is fair, very good review.

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  9 месяцев назад +1

      Tools are a pretty big chunk of the game though, hell it's the whole top section of your player board. But generally you will be dependant on orders because there's not enough turns to suddenly change tactics or grab resources you don't have.

    • @shayanaminnjad5354
      @shayanaminnjad5354 8 месяцев назад +1

      I have played the game twenty times now, and I see myself doing three or four tools every game! I have maxed tools (the horn) three times. Besides the contracts, the point/money track and the workers can give you tools. So I think if you aim for it, it is almost always a viable strategy. About the contract display, in a two player game you will be picking up one contract per 3.5 contracts you'll see on average. I think it is a good ratio. I have play-tested games where I had eight contracts to choose from, but I couldn't do any of them! So I think the display size does not matter, what matters is if you have enough options at any moment of the game. I think Woodcraft has done a great job of doing that. For sure luck plays a role, but that's the game, you could have ten contracts at the beginning of the game, and just do them. Perfect information. But I prefer the tactical decisions and the race involved.
      Also the objectives are not a must. You have to really consider getting five points and five money, as with that five money it is possible to get more than 15 points.
      I have played it solo and two players, maybe the experience differs with more players. And honestly I have no desire to play it more than two, it just introduces lots of downtime.

  • @renatotavares5845
    @renatotavares5845 Год назад

    What about house rules, to cycle the cards more often in solo game and having more cards available with more players, had you tried that?

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад +1

      That's what I'd suggest. Already tried a few - it helps but doesn't vastly change the game.

  • @Listan1
    @Listan1 Год назад +1

    Did you like Sabika better?

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад +1

      Not played it.

    • @Listan1
      @Listan1 Год назад

      @@TheBrokenMeeple Is it in the plans or you don’t have Sabika? If you say Attiwa is amazing I’m going to cry because that box cover and theme would give me nightmares!!

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад +1

      @@Listan1 Attiwa is fun so far! Sabika I don't have, the cover and concept didn't take my fancy and was one of the ones I skipped over.

  • @truenorth2615
    @truenorth2615 Год назад

    It's interesting that you note the swingy nature of the cards.....I really dislike that sort of thing as well....but at the same time you Viticulture in your top 20....MAN...I think Viticulutre is by and large a solid game but the swinginess of the cards really bothers me.

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад

      It indeed has that too, but my whole game doesn't need to rely on them.
      In Woodcraft, everything is those orders. If I start going for tools, I need the orders to be based around tools otherwise I'm wasting my time. And there's only a small number of rounds so you don't have time to adapt.
      In Viticulture my strategy is not based on the cards, they simply represent a nice tactical bonus when I obtain them.

  • @quesoblanco444
    @quesoblanco444 Год назад +1

    I kind of felt your complaints here were a bit off. I have played the solo many times now, and never felt my options limited. I also didn't think the players starting hands were at all "swingy". The rulebook states the end-game-scoring cards will usually only be claimed by a single player, so that is at least intentional. I don't know that they are as OP as you claim, maxing them out seems a bit tough. Also, the "free cut with a planting" rule is important to know, but it is also right where it should be, and has it's own paragraph, so you would only be unaware if you forgot or did not read the rulebook, which I thought was very well written. Maybe if I play with people I'll see it differently, but to me anyhows, you seemed all worked up over nut'n.

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад

      It's ONLY in the rulebook though and such a key aspect to balancing the action, it would take nothing to have it on the board or on an aid as I do see others forgetting it too.
      The swingy aspect is definitely a thing though. The cards that come out will dictate a lot of your ability to do well depending on your starting focus. You don't get time to change your strategy mid game so if you start on tools and then they never turn up, the initial tools were a waste of time. And in solo the cards don't change often often enough or even the dice available to purchase either.

    • @TheLuminousCleric
      @TheLuminousCleric Год назад

      I was taught last night, and I also forgot about this rule.

    • @TheBrokenMeeple
      @TheBrokenMeeple  Год назад

      @@TheLuminousCleric vindication 👍😁