I enjoy your reviews, but I'd seek them out if only you'd measured the Big-3 specs of the actual frame you're testing. You have an RDC machine. Why not use it?
The 2021 version, although it test at a 61 RA on my RDC machine, it is much stiffer than the 2.0 version and the sweet spot is smaller on the 2021 version. As they stated in the video here, it has way way more feedback when you strike the ball. Also more head light than the 2021 version. Mine weighed in at 338 with an overgrip, but I added about two grams of lead under the grip to give it just a little more of a "whippy" feeling for more spin and ease on serves. You should try it and see what you think. As a longtime picky Prestige user, I was pleasantly surprised. I demoed recently and will now be ordering more of these. I stung mine with Yonex Poly Tour Rev for control and spin at 51lbs. It pockets the ball nicely. Are you an advanced player? I wouldn't recommend unless you are 4.5 or better, as they spoke of in the video. You need a fast experienced swing to move the heft, but when you make contact with the ball, the feeling is amazing.
I picked up 2 Dunlop CX200 TOUR 18X20. I really like it, but I like softer string in it. This racket gives control . Try it, and the price is right now
Hi tennis spin guys, do you think That this prestige tour has the same power level that the gravity pro? And which one is more maneuverable for a one handed backhand?. Thanks in advance
I'm playing with a 1 handed backhand, used to play with a Gravity pro and now playing with this Prestige. The Gravity pro is definitely a good racket, but more suited for two-handed backhand, this Prestige is the best racket I played with, 95 head is excellent for one hander, more powerful than the Gravity more maneuverable, very nice pocketing on the backhand, overall perfect mixture of power stability and control.
@@davidgoldbaum3979 I completely agree with what you say, I already bought a pair of Prestige TOUR and I feel the same as you, GREAT stability and maneuverability for the one handed backhand, power, plow trough, spin, Magnificent CONTROL, and I love the feel. After years of trying more than 15 rackets, the search is over, it is the closest thing to what the Pro Staff RF 97 Autograph offered me, but without giving me problems in my arm.
Ascetic what? 5:03 Ching talks about aesthetics instead! 🤣🤣 6:03 The Auxetic 2.0 Prestige Tour is far more muted than the 360+ Prestige Pro predecessor. No idea what Gu’s been smoking.
All the new Head racquets that are listed as "98" are actually "98" now. This racquet is done with the old measurement. So, it is actually a "95" sq inch head size.
What's with saying it has power? This is a very low powered racquet. This review makes it sound like it's just a good racquet without differentiating it from other racquets in any way.
I felt the same way I think they are refering to the mass based power because the swing weight is on the higher side and the beam is thicker so in comparison to a 2023 Prestige pro its more powerful while still having a lot of control. I whole heartedlee agree they should make the distinction between massbased power and stiffness based power.
Absolutely the best racquet I've played with
Very much diference from the previous one?
The racquet + poly strings + mic setup made for some nice hitting audio
Bring the thunder
What do you think of the mp?
Gu is playing great with it
Is this similar to old Prostaff 95 16x19 (the one that was 313g and really thin beam)?
I love your videos.... greetings from Italy.
I enjoy your reviews, but I'd seek them out if only you'd measured the Big-3 specs of the actual frame you're testing. You have an RDC machine. Why not use it?
I’m trying to decide between this 95 and the Dunlop 95. Gotta choose but not sure since I can’t demo them all.
The Dunlop will require customization. This one will not. It's good to go right off the shelf.
What’s the difference between version 2021 and 2023 for prestige tour?
The 2021 version, although it test at a 61 RA on my RDC machine, it is much stiffer than the 2.0 version and the sweet spot is smaller on the 2021 version. As they stated in the video here, it has way way more feedback when you strike the ball. Also more head light than the 2021 version. Mine weighed in at 338 with an overgrip, but I added about two grams of lead under the grip to give it just a little more of a "whippy" feeling for more spin and ease on serves. You should try it and see what you think. As a longtime picky Prestige user, I was pleasantly surprised. I demoed recently and will now be ordering more of these. I stung mine with Yonex Poly Tour Rev for control and spin at 51lbs. It pockets the ball nicely. Are you an advanced player? I wouldn't recommend unless you are 4.5 or better, as they spoke of in the video. You need a fast experienced swing to move the heft, but when you make contact with the ball, the feeling is amazing.
@ thanks for sharing! So you prefer 2.0 version?
I picked up 2 Dunlop CX200 TOUR 18X20. I really like it, but I like softer string in it. This racket gives control . Try it, and the price is right now
can you get depth and spin?
@slowbot68 the racket offers control
whats the string set up u used?
Looks like hawk power.
Hi tennis spin guys, do you think That this prestige tour has the same power level that the gravity pro? And which one is more maneuverable for a one handed backhand?. Thanks in advance
gravity pro is more maneuverable and easy to use
Customizing a 330 swingweight racket…? Not for you guys….
I'm playing with a 1 handed backhand, used to play with a Gravity pro and now playing with this Prestige. The Gravity pro is definitely a good racket, but more suited for two-handed backhand, this Prestige is the best racket I played with, 95 head is excellent for one hander, more powerful than the Gravity more maneuverable, very nice pocketing on the backhand, overall perfect mixture of power stability and control.
@@davidgoldbaum3979 I completely agree with what you say, I already bought a pair of Prestige TOUR and I feel the same as you, GREAT stability and maneuverability for the one handed backhand, power, plow trough, spin, Magnificent CONTROL, and I love the feel. After years of trying more than 15 rackets, the search is over, it is the closest thing to what the Pro Staff RF 97 Autograph offered me, but without giving me problems in my arm.
@@bananafish1272 how is gravity pro with its 100 sq. in. teardrop head shape more maneuverable?
the bumper guard is weird why does it flare out like that by the throat
נצחון מושלם
Chris handing gu the mic😂😂😂
is this like andy murray specs?
Ascetic what?
5:03 Ching talks about aesthetics instead! 🤣🤣
6:03 The Auxetic 2.0 Prestige Tour is far more muted than the 360+ Prestige Pro predecessor. No idea what Gu’s been smoking.
No others said the same its less muted
Harry and Coach Ching are not on the same page in this one. Did Harry say the F bomb?
Very much diference from the previous one?
Yes! More flex and less muted. Bigger sweet spot. More head light.
it’s actually closer to a 98 I think… don’t know how they measure it to be 95
All the new Head racquets that are listed as "98" are actually "98" now. This racquet is done with the old measurement. So, it is actually a "95" sq inch head size.
Ι have the 2021 auxetic and dissapoint ed me it is to heavy makes come to the ball late after a while. Those that know 95 qualities i prefer v core 95
Harry was hitting half decent with that racket, He should switch to it !!!
The mp is 99 but looks like 100
What's with saying it has power? This is a very low powered racquet. This review makes it sound like it's just a good racquet without differentiating it from other racquets in any way.
I felt the same way I think they are refering to the mass based power because the swing weight is on the higher side and the beam is thicker so in comparison to a 2023 Prestige pro its more powerful while still having a lot of control. I whole heartedlee agree they should make the distinction between massbased power and stiffness based power.
Last prestige tour had very high power potential
@@BeastOfTheMidEast relative to other prestiges, but this is still one of the least powerful lines of racquets available
@@jorgetirado3201 yes he compares to previous ones only
Compared to the older Prestige.