Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Sorry Neumann, I Can't Work Like This Anymore...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2023
- My journey to becoming a full-time mix engineer required a speaker upgrade... Here's why.
🎧THE WORKING AUDIO TOOLS PODCAST 🎧
linktr.ee/work...
🎧 Get YOUR Song Mixed By Ed 🎧
edthorne.com/t...
🎼 GET 7% OFF DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION with DistroKid 🎼
distrokid.com/v...
🎹 GET 30% OFF MASTERING: get.landr.com/... 🎹
Use THIS coupon at checkout: GETLANDREDTHORNE30OFF
🎧 BACKGROUND MUSIC from EPIDEMIC SOUNDS 🎧
www.epidemicso...
🎤 All Audio recorded at 24bit/48kHz 🎤
🔥 ED ONLINE 🔥
ORIGINAL MUSIC: shorturl.at/ceiPT
INSTAGRAM: / theedthorne
WEBSITE: www.EdThorne.com
🔔 SUBSCRIBE 🔔 for home studio music production-related content:
www.youtube.co...
💲 STUDIO GEAR I USE - THOMANN 💲
www.thomann.de...
💲 STUDIO GEAR I USE - SWEETWATER 💲
- Current Deals - imp.i114863.ne...
VOCAL CHAIN (Videos & Podcast)
- SE Dynacaster Microphone - sweetwater.sjv...
- NEVE 1073LB Preamp - sweetwater.sjv...
- Wes Audio SuperCarrier II Lunchbox - sweetwater.sjv...
- Flock Audio Digital Patch Bay - sweetwater.sjv...
- API 550b EQ - sweetwater.sjv...
- Maag EQ4 - sweetwater.sjv...
- DBX 520 De-Esser - sweetwater.sjv...
AUDIO INTERFACES
- Apollo Twin - sweetwater.sjv...
- Apollo X6 - sweetwater.sjv...
- Apollo X16 - sweetwater.sjv...
- UAD-2 Octo Satellite DSP Core - sweetwater.sjv...
SPEAKERS
- Neumann KH750 Subwoofer - sweetwater.sjv...
- Neumann MA1 Room Calibration Mic - sweetwater.sjv...
- PSI A23 Speakers - Get in touch via email.
- Anker SoundCore 2 (Alt Speakers) - amzn.to/46vNn63
- IsoAcoustics 430 Isolation Stands - sweetwater.sjv...
HEADPHONES (Closed Back)
- Sennheiser HD300 Pros - sweetwater.sjv...
- sweetwater.sjv...
HEADPHONES (Open Back)
- Sennheiser HD600s - sweetwater.sjv...
ANALOG GEAR
-Warm Audio Bus-Comp - sweetwater.sjv...
- SSL G-Bus Compressor (500) - sweetwater.sjv...
- Serpent Audio SB4001 Stereo Compressor - sweetwater.sjv...
- Wes Audio Rhea Vari-Mu Tube Compressor - sweetwater.sjv...
- SSL 611 EQ - sweetwater.sjv...
- AMS Neve RMX16 Reverb - sweetwater.sjv...
DRUM RECORDING GEAR
- Evo 16 - sweetwater.sjv...
- Evo SP8 - sweetwater.sjv...
- WA-2MPX Preamps - sweetwater.sjv...
- Lewitt BeatKit Pro Drum Mic Set - sweetwater.sjv...
- Lewitt BeatKit 4-Piece Mic Set - sweetwater.sjv...
- Austrian Audio OC818s - sweetwater.sjv...
ACCESSORIES
- Monitor Screen - amzn.to/46vNn63
- SanDisk 1Tb Hard Drive (Never had one fail!) - sweetwater.sjv...
#SpeakerUpgrade #StudioMonitors #MixingEngineer
![Chuckyy - Devil Hours [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f3wZGj0VnZU/mqdefault.jpg)
🌟 I should have prefaced this video by stating I have worked with a professional acoustician to optimise both my room and the speaker placement, and I still have the same issue. Due to space limitations I can’t have the speakers mounted on stands behind the desk, and yes, I have tried isolation pucks. I’m also not saying the Neumann’s are bad speakers, they just don’t work for me in my studio. Peace.
A few thoughts and lets go backwards:
If the mix lacks mids, then the mids are too loud in the room.
Neumanns have incredibly good horizontal dispersion. That means they sound great in untreated rooms, too - but:
If you dampen the room according to measurements with speakers with a less perfect sound and mid range scoop, then according to measurements the room will show much more midrange and you may conclude it needs midrange dampening.
But if you do that, the room will suck out the mids from the incredibly flat dispersion of Neumanns.
Or vice versa: measuring a room with speakers that scoop the lows ad/or highs with their horizontal reflections.
Solution: Just remove all the dampening - you will have a higher RT60, but probably a much better sound with the Neumanns. And THEN measure the untreated room with the Neumanns with REW and decide what the room really needs.
KH310s here. Have never had any problem with them. Treated room, Sound ID, etc. Got used to them, know how they sound, love them. Focal Alpha Evo have also been amazing ngl
If they work for you in your room, amazing!🔥🤘
I used KH120 for 10 years and never had an issue with the mids, But I am in a properly designed room with sub. Now on the KH310s with sub (KH120 ins the 5.1). The 310s have better transients and much easier to EQ with. Not sonar or room corrections The room design is everything!
Yes! Proper acoustics beats Sonarworks.
Yeh, like I said in the video, for me the problem was the combination of the two (room and speakers). My new speakers (to be revealed) don’t have the same problem.
This is true. Most people have compromised rooms though. SoundiD can help get you in the ball park but the phase correction/time alignment is nowhere near the Neumann DSP and a complete failure compared to Trinnov.
Neumann kh120ii + Kh750 sub + MA-1 = never heard music as clearly in my life, and Ive been in many pro studios. And Im listening in an untreated, odd shaped room… Thank you Neumann, I now have a fighting chance!
With the MK2s it can be that they sound better now, but with the old ones and KH 750 DSP + MA1 I was a bit disappointed.
Hey! I just bought a pair of Neumann kh310s to replace my Yamaha HS7. I love the kh310 the sound is incredible. However I’ve seen a lot of info about adding a sub to really make them special. Would you recommend this???
@@ARCASIAUKI think for the 310s you don’t need to add a sub, it depends to the musical genre you’re working on.
But the frequency of the 310s should go deep enough to get a good mix out of them.
The Sub is more for room correction in my opinion. :-)
Or you get the IK Multimedia ARC Studio for frequency control and room correction.
@@maxzandermusic Thanks for your suggestion. I might get the sub just for the DSP capability as my room is not the best for treatment. I’m sure this would enhance the 310s in some way!
This is why I went with the kh150 + sub. The KH150 were a little more in the low mid to my ears. But I do use the Neumann MA1 to calibrate them now.
I am not doing a lot of music production but for broadcast, it translated really well. Genelecs are usually the name of the game in broadcast but my mixes always translated better on the KH150's on both the worst to the best TV setups compared to my mixes on the Genelecs.
Might also be worth it to check filtering (on the speakers themselves) and changing your crossover point before investing in new speakers for those who have issues with their speakers.
I dipped mine a bit on the low end.
I just replaced my KH120As with PSI A25-Ms. Still using the KH750DSP for room correction and bass extension. That combination is the BEST sound I've heard! The setup I have now is definitely going to up my mixing and mastering game. Now to move into the professional domain, because I've been mixing and mastering pro bono for years. I want to make it a job now I have enough experience and I'm much more consistent.
Excellent. Sounds like we’ve had similar journeys!🔥
@@EdThorne Aye! It's funny how we both started with KH120s then moved to PSIs. I was actually looking on eBay for the past few years for "dream monitors", ranging from things like KH310s, Eve Audio, HEDD, Adam, etc. But the A25-Ms randomly showed up for just over £3k as I was about to buy a car with my "new car fund". Best purchase ever! Now I'll be cycling everywhere for the next few months. Priorities! 😂
Hey, I'm confused, when you listened to the Neumann speakers on Gearfest, you noticed the mid-range signature but your room bumps mid-range, too. So I thought you were going to say you'd improve your room's acoustics, but then you talked about the other speakers. Did you not like the Neumann's when you heard them propperly on Gearfest or why are you opting for new speakers rather than changing your room's acoustics? cheers!
I have done all I can over the last two years to improve the room acoustics but there is still a large mid-range build up. The low mid “presence” or “forwardness” of the Neumann’s is something I identified at GearFest on the whole speaker range and realised it was the brand’s sonic signature that I don’t like. This is compounded by the problems in my room so I decided I need a different speaker as I can’t move/change studios.
@@EdThorne How close are your speakers to the side walls and front wall? Which combinations have you tried?
IMO even his voice on this video does not sound good. Who is making a public video bashing the Neumanns, instead of showing room EQ analysis measurement by REW? Sonarworks is NOT adequate for room analysis!
I went from Dynaudio DBM50s to Adam A7vs and noticed a much faster mixing time. They also allowed me to mix brighter without fatiguing my ears. Then I added a KRK 10" sub and have found the low end to be much better translating, especially when making more electronic music. It almost made no difference with my rock mixing. One of the reasons I changed, was because of my small space, needing front ported instead of rear.
i would def switch out your krk sub if its the 10S. the polk audio psw10 is far better. i made this switch on my adams set up and it made a huge difference. cheaper sub too. got this from @asherpostman here on youtube.
KH120 user here of 5 yrs. I found the same thing, they are very low mid forward. I've found that going into the eq switches on the back and taking out some low mids and adding the 1db treble boost has turned them into really balanced little monitors that are like microscopes for audio. I also found that getting them as close to me as possible also made a big difference! Definitely temped by the Barefoot Footprint 03s though as an upgrade!
That's great! Definitely try the Barefoots before you try them. I hated them! Amphions and PSIs all the way for me now.
I'm just an diy speaker/audio/music hobbyist and diy a quad tower speaker system that's very revealing. I used soft domes from visaton for tweeter 20mm, and midrange 50mm. For woofer I used the glassfiber gf200. Diyed a crossover with good quality components. I did some room treatment with rockwool as well with a surface of 4x1.2x2.4m. What really helped me figuring things out was having a good reference ie a measuring mike. not sure you've got one, just watched your two most recent videos but didn't hear you mention it. I like the umik1 mike with room eq wizard or REW for short for sweeps of my room from the listening position and the diy speakers at around 1m. Doing this allows you to see what the speakers put out and how the room responds to it without much guesswork, though there are a lot of caveats though.
I've also been on a journey how music should sound like and also how speakers should actually sound like, how much detail am I missing? Things like target room response came up and my speakers and room are pretty close to that and it sounds great!
You talk a lot about reverb tails. I use my speakers in quad stereo config with a surround sound receiver to get the time of arrival correct. Like how the guys talked about being surrounded in the music with dolby atmos, it's very impressive to behold, even with just 4 speakers!
Quad speakers for mixing is likely not useful, but it does let you hear the stereo image more pronounced and you'd be able to spot problems a lot easier. On my receiver I can easily switch to stereo which sounds better for some music styles.
Really looking forward to your discoveries!
@Ed Thorne Music Production
1. Get rid of your high-back chair.
2. Get rid of your large Reflective Display Monitor smack dab between your monitors (or at least TRY draping a large goose down comforter over the front and back of the display as an A/B)
3. Do you have a Floating Cloud Absorber/Diffusor over your desk close to the front wall and extending out past your mix position?
4. Try bringing the Monitors out to the Front Edge of your Desk.
This would apply to ANY monitors that you are using.
Apparently you have already made your final decision for the monitors, and I haven't watched any of your newer videos, but I would have advised you to also have tried the Dutch & Dutch 8C. I might suggest the Kii THREE as well, but I think the 8C might even be pushing it in regards to the size for your current space.
If you ended up with the PDP MUM8, good on you.
Just test the presonus scepters and be happy. I use them as my close range speakers. And have some eq curves to test translations. I never ever have a translation issue.
tbh I felt like my speakers were not giving me what I wanted...BUT then I added two subs and it just worked and price was ok added two Genelec 7360 subs to my 8340s and sold my 8341 and 8350s, with SAM I found that splitting everything in my smallish room just worked so I would suggest to most people try adding a sub to your system for a trial.
DAC DAC DAC!!! upgrading to a High Quality Mastering grade DAC was the game changer in how and what I was hearing out of my monitors. Adam S3H and PMC Result 6s
I’m using the X16 for now. Numerous retailers have suggested I upgrade but one thing at a time. My new speakers were expensive 🤣
Running Yamaha HS7s paired with HS8s sub. Kind of budget/mid alternative but works well. Doesn't sound too good tbh, which is what I like about em! Either way...looking forward seeing what you're working on now!
So basically you’re saying they’re very good for studio monitors because of the flat response? vs than just listening to music
@@Mope333 In short, yes. Don't get me wrong, music sounds good on them, but there are more "pleasing" alternatives.
I love my KH120’s… but I do find them a bit dark sometimes so overcompensate with the high end. I’ve also stopped trusting sonarworks and feel my mixes translate better when I don’t use it in the mix process! I have recently bought the NDH30 and found them quite interesting…
I know what you mean. It’s a compromise of 2-way speakers though, they’ll never extend in either direction as far as a 3-way. Sonarworks/SoundiD works well from an EQ perspective up to 3-4dB, max, then it does strange things. It also doesn’t get the phase alignment even close. The KH750 sub is a noticeable step up. Then Trinnov blows that out of the water again!
I also stopped using Sonarworks. It’s glitchy and poorly implemented.
Hi, thank you for the video! Just some thoughts from me, haven't had any experience with Neumann monitors but I kind of went through a similar thing with mine years ago. I didn't change them. I worked very carefully with references, not many, three in particular, I lstened a lot of music casually on them not only when I was working and I learned this way to critically listen outside of the room. Whenever I hear about the "sweet" spot and room correction and all of these things, I feel a little embarrassed to think that I use the whole of the house as a listening space. Certain frequencies build up in certain spots outside my mixing room and it's only natural due to the physics of the bass frequencies that travel way further back. I now love my monitors and wouldn't change them for anything but I'm also confident that I can mix a great result through everything as long as I have my three referencies and some time to climatize to a new enviroment. If you haven't done this before, next time you mix leave your door open and go about your house doing everyday chores. Maybe you'd be surprised at what you learn. Cheers!
Acoustic Treatment, Converters, and Monitors are the main Things, but as you said about your room, it is a matter of being use to hear there. I also suggest gearing up from the UAD converters to the Lynx Audio Aurora n (which I did 4 months ago) and you can hear the difference in the mids, the round lows, and the depth and stereo image.
Numerous people have made this suggestion. I’ve blown all my budget on the new speakers though (and Trinnov) 🤣
@@EdThorne ok let's wait for this!!!
Hi Ed, great video! I am using the KH80’s which I aligned using the MA1 mic and software and that produced a noticeable improvement. But another improvement was found, following upgrading my Audio interface! I hadn’t realised how big a difference converters actually made. It was always something I would hear said, but I honestly did not take it as seriously as I should have. Now I hear things from KH80’s that I previously didn’t and the improvement is pretty big, so I think that is a huge part of the puzzle in my humble opinion. Next move is the Kh750👍🏾😄
What did you upgrade from and to? I’m using an X16 atm which was an improvement in my X6.
@@EdThorne was using the Apollo twin duo (mk1) but had the Apollo twin x. However, decided not to keep it despite good improvement.! Other RME users recommended (engineers/friends whom opinions i trust ) Have pointed me towards the RME ADI-2 pro fS (black edition) or UCX range for even better converters! So this is the route I plan to take. Have you tested the RME stuff?
@riasure I’ve never used the RME stuff, no. I should probably do a comparison with the Apollo at some point but may as well wait for new models now as they’ve both been out so long.
@@EdThorne yes I agree re. how long the UA Apollo twin x in particular has been out….2019😱. That’s a very long time in terms of technology advancement and also a reason I decided to return mine. Although your mate Paul Third is familiar with the RME stuff! Just so you know RME have a new audio interface Fireface UFX IIII which was released this year 2023! I have heard amazing stuff about it!! I would really like you to do a comparison. That would make for some very interesting content😄.
@riasure I have a contact at RME’a UK distributor now so this could be on the cards.
Different speakers for different scenarios different rooms. I have genelec s30ch in the semi treated room for critical listening but I get ear fatigue from them after a few hours even at low volumes. Genelec 8010 for the office which are great for that room. Dynaudio bm15p with bryston 4b in the living room as I dont have enough rack space for them in the treated room. Adam t5v in the semi treated room to not piss off the neighbours in the late evenings.
I think it’s worth noting that, while corrective eq solutions like SoundID can work wonders, they are generally going to be less effective at correcting for underreporting caused by phase cancellation at your listening position than correcting for build ups or resonances. It’s really an uphill battle correcting for that. My solution was to try to place my monitors where their response was as flat as I could get pre-treatment, specifically trying to find a spot without too many big deficits, then use acoustic treatment to try and combat the more overt resonances, with SoundID further refining things at the end.
Obviously all monitors have a certain sound to them and if they don’t work for you that’s totally understandable, but it can be very worthwhile to experiment with placement just to see if you can negate the negative influences of the room that can’t be as easily corrected with eq and then go from there.
Cheers!
Yeh, I’ve had a professional acoustician in to try and get the best response in the room naturally. I agree about SoundiD, it is limited. The Neumann DSP fares better but Trinnov destroys them both. I have a Nova on the way. 🤘
I’m using Yamaha HS8 for mids
And genelec
And I’m happy with it
I have the Neumann headphones it’s so flat but I don’t mix with it 😊
You can tweak the target eq curve on the KH80 DSP as part of the calibration process. Sounds like scooping a bit of the offending frequency range may get things sounding better in your room. That said, a bigger, full range system is always going to be a good investment for a mix engineer.
I had the analog 120s. Even room correction didn’t solve what I didn’t like about the speakers. I hear the same thing on the 150s, 310s and 420s.
@@EdThorneI’m sure you’ll end up in a better place by upgrading your monitoring. So this may be a little academic, but what I’m talking about is slightly different to just doing to automatic room calibration. With the DSP Neumann models, you can manually adjust the correction curve with an additional eq offset. So, if you are consistently perceiving it as mid forward even after room calibration, you can bring down the offending frequencies until it sounds right to you and include that in the calibration file stored by the speaker.
Interestingly, there’s a sound on sound review where it’s mentioned that Neumann claim the reason they can sound mid forward to some people is psychoacoustic - they measure flat but have so much mid range detail and resolution due to the crossover design that the ear can perceive this as being boosted in those frequencies. It’s an interesting take. I guess aim to measure flat but allow the user to tune the voicing with the onboard DSP is a best of both worlds approach.
Of course, Sonarworks also allows you to tweak the correction curve but I’m not a fan of plugin based speaker management in general because I like to reference music from apps outside of my DAW, and it all adds additional complexity to bouncing stuff down etc.
Anyway, it sounds like you’ve already moved on to a solution that’s working better for you, I’m looking forward to watching the rest of your journey.
I had Neumann KH120s for about 5 years and ended up having the same guesswork in mixing as you described.
I upgraded to Amphion One15s that are just so much better at telling me where the problems are. I can hear the difference between compressor attack and release times so much clearer.
After that I added Dirac live which took them to the next level.
Amphions are great speakers. Probably the best average of all the speakers I’ve heard.
A friend of mine that do mastering for a living, got a pair of Dutch & Dutch 8C, since then he told me his work is much accurate than ever. And I can feel it on mixes I send him. It got more accurate than before. The way he analyses music is much better.
It's very expensive speakers (12k€), but has internal dsp correction and stuff. Maybe worth to give a listen if you have a place to.
Dave Pensado is currently using D&D8s. I’ve heard they’re pretty special. The £9/10k mark is fiercely competition and very subjective. I haven’t heard these but the similarly priced Ex Machina’s blew me
Away!
For my little home studio I chose Genelec SAM 8320A active monitors paired with SAM 7350A active subwoofer and I couldn’t be happier, although this setup would be insufficient for your needs. The GLM software is very slick, and the performance is very impressive given my budget. I’m looking forward to your critical review of the Genelecs, even if you choose to review the more appropriate The Ones series monitors.
I know the sound of the Genelecs from broadcast jobs and a couple of studios so I didn’t demo a pair for this investigation. They’re great speakers but I knew I wasn’t going to get them. It was nice to hear them again at GearFest though.
I have worked as an intern in a studio which uses Quested speakers and I was always second guessing there when I was mixing there. I felt like I didn't quite hear the mid range and I felt like the speakers where kinda dark. At home I've got eve sc207 and I feel like they're great but my room is quite bad. so Now I am saving up to get some nice treatment going 👍
Have you measured your room for problems using REWs (or SoundiD)? There’s a lot you can do before treatment (position/speaker distances/equilateral triangle positioning, etc). Simple first reflection point treatment goes a long way too. Good luck!
I had the exact same problem with a pair of 310s + two 750 subs. Scooped mids. Our mastering engineer always sent something back that sounded not right on the neumanns but great everywhere else.
I am guy that records my own music as well as small projects for other mixing on a pair of control 10s made by JBL that use the same 3 way drivers found in the 4412 which I found for a very good price apparently unused save for a single small conference. I have been able to learn little about the history of these speakers but they absolutely transformed my results where translation and really in all categories are measured. Best money I ever spent on any component. Maybe because I worked at a studio using 4412s in the 1990s is a part of why I get such confidence when making those changes In mixing that often I would agonize over before? I am interested to see this series as a speaker guy.
I have the 310A, 120 ii & KH80. All are ruler flat. The KH120 version 1 was always a weak link, the version 2 is totally re designed and much better in every aspect.
Got a pair of ATC SCM25 MK2 earlier this year, (also use Kali Audio IN-8's, which i thing are fantastic.) The ATC's have cut my mix time down considerably. The detail in the mid range is incredible to my ears. I don't use sonar works anymore, just spent some time learning these speakers and everything translates.
The ATCs are awesome. And yeh, cut my mix time way down too. Then I heard the PSIs and they did it again! Then I started over working because they’re too revealing 🤣 A balance was found.
Same exact experience here
Love my Genelec 1029's with a Tannoy subwoofer. Get great mixes, used them for over 25 years now.
Good stuff. 25yrs in the same room?
Focals Shape Twins are my monitors and are just the best under 2k imo!
These and the Adam A7Xs are very tasty!
Kh310 + Kh750dsp in a fully treated room = dream combination
Are you using the MA1 room correction too?
@@EdThorne yes i do !
I also have the KH120’s and I have a feeling I’m experiencing the same issue. As a result I’m looking around at other monitoring options. Unfortunately the MUM’s, PSI, ATC and PMC’s are well out of my budget. However, I’m considering the Focal Solo6 ST6’s.
Did you get to hear those at Gearfest? If you did, what were your thoughts on those vs the KH120’s?
I’ve heard the same complaint from many people. I haven’t heard the Solo ST6s. They may have been in their Atmos room at GearFest but I didn’t pay close enough attention to accurately comment, sorry.
I have built a garden mixing room and treated it well. I have a pair of Kali IN-5's strapped to a Kali WS 6.2 subwoofer which only cost me about £1600! This gives me a superb 4-way system with a great detailed sound, stereo subs in a single speaker and so far my music has translated really well. 😎
Nice. How did the build go? Any planning permission issues? I’m considering building a place in the future (UK).
I have been and am this similar journey as well. I use the Adam Audio 7XA and reference with the Neumann MD30 headphones and I ran into similar struggles in translations, but had to break things down to their basics. I ran REV to analyze my room, checked the frequency responses of my monitors, headphones and outside speakers that I use to check my mix and made diagrams for reference. So I am learning the strengths and weaknesses of my room and pieces of gear to mix accordingly. Also spectrum analyzers will detect what your monitors and or ears do not. As Warren says don't mix what what you can't hear. Every speaker will have its strengths, flaws and signature, but like you said there are Mixers that use NS10s that can make our work seem embarrassing. That is because they have the technical skillset and experience not necessarily the gear. Neumann does make great products, but it may be a case of those speakers just did not jive with your room. I am still in the beginning of this journey as well, so there is always something new that you learn through trial and error. It is also comforting to know that you are not alone in the struggles that we experience in this craft.
You’ve hit the nail on the head! But I keep hearing people struggle with the Neumann’s (including a guys who’s mixed Dua Lipa…)😰
I have the most random monitoring setup, but it works really good for me and I dont have acoustic treatment because I've moved from my home (about 2-3 months ago) to a room in the back of a house. I use Kali LP6 V1 (not the 2nd wave) as my "upper" monitors and a HS8 as sub (not the HS8S).
I use iD14 as Audio Interface and I made a routing work to have this to work properly, not clashing frequencies. I don't have perfect monitors placement and I use ARC 3 from IK Multimedia as my calibration software.
THE ONLY "Problem" I have is that I sometimes put a little too much of treble (like a hihat a little bit louder than it should be to others mixers I sent my mixes). Anyway, the sound has been pretty balanced, although my condictions are not perfect at the moment.
I've never felt this way before, but I'm very happy with the sound I can get out of my system nowadays.
Edit: Using the HS8 as a SUB with the ARC 3 calibration made the biggest difference for me. "It's all about that bass" lol
That’s great. It’s all about learning your environment. I felt I was still battling an uphill battle though so decided to spend on better speakers.
@@EdThorne I really hope that the change of audio monitors helps you in that journey! Have you ever considered change the DAC (converter)? A lot of people say it makes an enormous difference in the monitoring. I was struggling with the midranges like you said in the video when I was using a pair of HS8 as my main monitor. TOO MUCH MIDRANGE (for me) 🤣
In my opinion, you always have to listen to the new speakers in your room. Because it changes everything. I got lucky that my new room isn't (or at least I think it isn't) compromising my mixes that much. I've tried Sonarworks (not the SoundID), it was sounding kinda right/flat but It didn't feel natural to me and I couldn't get a mix that made me proud... that was the difference between Sonarworks and ARC 3 for me and it has helped a lot.
Well, there's always someway/something to upgrade. I guess even Serban Ghenea has something he wants to upgrade in his monitoring system lol
I'm ashamed to say I've been mixing on a pair of JBL LSR305's for about 6 years now. I got them for free, brand new, from Guitar Center due to a refund error they had made, and I suppose I just "forgot" to let them know (I've still forgotten to tell them to this day actually). I'm very happy with my current mixes and I've gotten to the point now where I don't even need to check them in the car anymore, I know they'll be at least 95% there. I think it's because I have just changed my outlook now and focus more on songwriting, arrangement and performance in particular, and the mixes tends to "fall into place" now. In the past it was very easy for me to confuse a bad song with a bad mix, but my philosophy now is that if you have a half decent room, with half decent speakers and a half decent setup, and you go and check your mix in the car, on headphones, with airpods etc, and it COMPLETELY falls apart on you... it's probably not entirely the speakers fault, it could be that you're too focused on the minor details rather than looking at the big picture.
Genelec 8300 series. I have the 8341 plus the the sub . I have a smalish room and they are the only speaker that worked in my room. And ive tried them all
ALL speakers?
Still using a pair of Mackie HRs here that I bought second hand about 15 years ago. They probably have some serious response issues, but I know how they sound, no need for a sub, and my room is treated well. If I lose sight I just bring up a reference to re-calibrate my ears. Works for me.
I mix 80% on headphones, due to having to be quiet while mixing late at night. I tried the Harman EQ curve (that @PaulThird recommended) on my mix bus and my mixes immediately started translating better on my monitors and other playback systems.
Yeh, Paul nailed it with that video.
Im sure is more about the room, when i was in my old room my NS10 sounds amazing, never have problems with the translation, recently moved to another place and they no translate as good as before.
Acoustic treatment is expensive and make a massive difference,if the space is small you cant do to much.
So my solution was VSX, rarely have problems with the translation since i have it, Low end is the most perfect i heard in any monitoring system.
Since you reference in all rooms, if sound good on all, you're good.
Great video btw! 😁
Thanks, Fernando. Yeh, my room isn’t perfect, but it’s also not the worst. I’ve optimised it as well as I can and the Neumann room correction DSP picks up the slack. Trinnov is on the way too🤘
@@EdThorne dont worry any room is perfect, just take time to developed your ears to the place, with headphones you get out the room of the equation, maybe can you used to check the mids only!
My guess is you should give yourself some more time to "unlearn" how you used to mix, in your old room. Listen to lots of references, and be sure you've nailed the speaker placement 100%
@@Tazmanian_Ninja yeah, but im 1rst room was more easy i must say, even 1 year hear can mix as good as the other room, so room is important
Have a pair of Yamaha HS7's and I couple those with Genelec 8030C's,feel I get all the information I need with both of those! Good duo!
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on these monitors! I think bass extension with even full range representation and ease of translation is crucial. Also if you could articulate how each monitor would feel to produce music on that’d be helpful as well
I will but I have since realised I didn’t use any of these while tracking… which is a different story again to mixing on which is a different story to listening to playback.
I’ve been in the room with some of the biggest mix engineers that still mix on NS10’s. Whatever you’re comfortable with. I use Slate VSX at the moment as my room is impossible to make sound good until I move to a new one.
The VSXs are VERY popular! No room is impossible but yeh, some are tricky. I thought mine was appalling to begin with but some placement changes made a big difference.
Yeah neumans are crap. I'll do you a favour and take them off your hands...I'll even pay for shipping! 😂
Haha. That’s a kind offer but they’ve long been sold🤣
@@EdThorne :-(
I'm a speaker guy too, I can't mix on headphones, I need some air between the generator and my ears :) I know what you're talking about, I've got similar journey with speakers. I demoed many of them in my studio: Ex Machina, Barefoot, APS, Genelec and more. I always felt not self confident enough with all these tools. Until I discovered Amphion, One15 especially. In my opinion One15 with Sub is one of the best mixing setups not only within its price range. It's all about its cohesion in the midrange. Amphion are always showing you the midrange as a monolith structure and they teach you as a personal sound assistant, advisor how to keep this monolith alive, how to polish it, make it even better. It's a magic expierence for me but I know I'm not alone. Give the Amphions a shot, you will be suprised! Best!
This is one of the few brands I haven’t heard or demo’d in this process actually (Kii’s and D&D8s being the others).
@@EdThorne Kii and 8c are imo in the group of transparent speakers, that can show you an issue/not an issue aspect in many subtle shades of gray in superb resolution. Amphions for better or worse can't show you those sound gradients, they will exaggerate issues, make it more black or white. The tick and thigh cohesion in the midrange helps you indicate the issues, you can react so easily, park things right then move to the next thing, bam bam and suddenly the mix is banging. They do have a sound and you learn how to work against this sound, but you do it very fast and effective. I can't work that fast on cardioid speakers like Kii or D8c, there are to many sound details to compute and each detail may distract you from the purpose. I prefer obvious decision making! But I'm aware why those cardioids are so hyped. They're excellent, but not every one is talented enough to make an advantage by using them!
Right now I have the Adam Audio A7X the previous generation. I really like them because I know them well and I know how my room, but I am looking for an upgrade to a 3 way monitor. This week I was looking to get the Barefoot Footprint 02 around 3k. So I’m still deciding before next week and now you will be reviewing a couple of them, it makes me curious. I’m not sure how long the video will be out. I am so ready to get them.
You should go with what your ears tell you but personally I’d avoid Barefoots like the plague. Way too much low-end, harsh and fizzy top-end, weak midrange. Focals any day at this price point.
@@EdThorne Thank you, in that case let me go back to the store to listen again.
If you can, see if your retailer will bring you a few different sets to try in your studio. There’s no point testing in a different listening environment (especially if their’s is acoustically optimised). SXPro Audio in the UK do this. I also recommend mixing on the speakers and not just listening to reference tracks. That helped me make my decision!
@@EdThorne You’re so right about that, not just listening. Thank you again.
I went the route of the Amphions - a lot of high profile mixers use them. A great producer/mixer and friend of mine got a pair and convinced me and my mixes really stepped up.
I’ve only heard incredible things about the Amphions. Not heard them myself though.
I'm very curious to hear/demo Amphion monitors. Have 14 pairs of speakers at home/studio now. Plus 5 subs. So I gotta chill... 😅
Latest purchase was some Yamaha NS-10's. Was surprised at how pleasant I find them.
I own the kh120 and i think theyre perfect. I dont think i will switch monitors in a long time and i actually think them not being perfect is what makes them so good. Mixing with a reference and a spectrum analyzer has been the real game changer for me
Referencing and knowing your room is key, for sure. These speakers simply don’t work - for me - in my room.
@@EdThorne yeah it's just a matter of taste I guess. I may find myself on the same situation as you a few years down the line haha!
I also have the Neumann KH 120 A with one
Adam Audio Sub 8
and they make a good team... But I also mix with beyerdynamic DT 150 headphones... I just think you just have to listen to a lot of references to know your own tool's strengths and weaknesses. You don't have the perfect room or the perfect tool... God bless
Love the journey Ed. I’ve found a lot of value in your review vids.
I’m a guitarist/songwriter who found myself getting busy mixing other folks music. My journey has been one of steady improvement over the years, but still feel like I’m flirting with “professional” mixes. I definitely found my room was hurting me. Recently I’ve been mixing on headphones (see Andrew Scheps opinion on this). Thus far , it’s improved my mixes.
Thanks, Daniel. I’ve mixed one track on headphones and I can hear the flaws now. Personally, I’m a speaker guy. It’s totally about what works for you. I only just feel like I’ve accomplished a professional mix on the last few weeks.
I think the styles you're mixing make a difference in what speakers to get. But ATC's translate extremely well in pretty much any genre. I have barefoot FP01's but I mainly produce and mix pop, rnb, afro, latin and house music. These sound fantastic for those genres but I probably would've chosen something different had I worked with rock/metal genres. Good luck on your journey!
Thanks. Yeh, different speakers lend themselves to different things.
I'm rocking the Focal Shape 65 and think they are very detailed and I can generally trust them and I find that they share a lot of similar qualities to a hifi Focal headphones but I'm thinking about getting RME adi-2 to have parametric EQ for room correction and solid converters, because though I have fairly well treated room with almost flawless reverb times, I find I need to correct bit of the area around 100Hz and slight dip in the mid range, their top end is just clear and sweet 🙂
When can we expect the video comparison of studio monitors?
Would like to see what you found!
If I were to upgrade from these Focals it would probably have to be something like Kii Three 😉
There’s a lot of love for the Focals. I have a Present Day Production/M.U.M.8 interview next week, and then my full comparison video.
I had the KH120s which convinced me to get the KH310s... the 3 way makes a huge difference. I predict you've opted for the ATCs... are you keeping the Neumann 750? Honestly, that subwoofer changed everything for me.
All will be revealed soon (Or follow me on Insta for more immediate clues 😉). I’m keeping the sub for now to run my room correction but I have Trinnov on the way so may not need it but I like the low-end extension it provides.
Here 2 x KH310A, KH750 and MA1. It's great. Results are very pleasant.
I went through this as well... I had been mixing on a 17 year old pair of $1500 Adam A7s and nothing was translating. I spend 6 hours at a local Vintage King listening to a TON of monitors.... PMC, Genelec, Focal, HEDD, Adam S-series, ATC...
So I ended up with ATC SCM25A-Pro Mk IIs... and what a difference. I really wanted the SCM45As but they wont fit in my room. But the 25s are a godsend.
They’re incredible speakers!
What a fantastic topic. My first mixes were done on Yamaha HS8's. My first mastering engineer picked up not only the brand of speakers but that I was also in an untreated room. Too much bottom end! I managed some room treatment, new monitors, Dynaudio BM15A's and also 2 sets of headphones, Sennheiser HD800S and the Neumann NDH30's. The difference was earth shattering. Sadly my monitors are boxed up and in the cupboard as I am dealing with noise restrictions but the headphones are working fine. Looking forward to seeing which way you went. PS I wish I had the options to review other brands like you, cheers Ma9Na
Yeh, it’s been a privilege to be able to try all these speakers. How are the HD800s?
I actually rotate between the HD 800S, HD820 and the Neuman NDH30's. The 800S give a brilliant sound stage, space and air. I find them nice and nuetral especially getting into the nitty gritty of finishing and very non fatiguing. I do miss my Dynaudio's though@@EdThorne
Focal SM-9 use them in focus mode most of the day but check full range when I feel like it's time to get the low end working on both bigger systems as well. I have Dirac for both setups and that room correction made me do 3 things better. Optimized position of speakers, a bit of eq on the focals to make them fit the room better and a the room became magic. Translates perfect and I know due to measurements (and lots of refernces) the room is at it's best with this combination. So I can recommend focal and dirac for less optimal rooms.
Hello Ed! I’d like to share my opinion on this matter. I feel like any speaker that somewhat follows the fletcher munson curve with really good decay and response time of the driver(s) (alignment as well) is what anybody trying to get great mixes that translate, should be using..combined with good taste in music and a lot of common sense on the genre of music the engineer is working on keeping the target platform/audience in mind (this can be culture/area/medium of consumption etc.). Speakers I feel that may help with this are NS-10, CLA-10A, Amphion One 15, Small genelecs with SAM for time alignment, PMC 6, ProAc SM100, Auratones etc. I feel like the complete mix should be done on this kind of setup and then a secondary setup with sub/threeway/ added sub to this that can be toggled with a footswitch to check how the mix sounds in a full range system. (Doesn’t matter it can even be krk speakers + sub as the full range checking speakers if budget is issue). This kind of process in my opinion really makes the engineer, the missing link. After much experimentation this is my conclusion. Ignore this ID name, it’s my younger brother’s iPad youtube lol…Let me know what you think :D
I’ve got my Focal CMS 65 and I truly love them. I know there’s way better speakers out there but, I like the level of detail and they’re not aggressive, allowing me to work long hours if I have to.
This is important. Some speakers I’ve tested were fatiguing, even at low volumes, that’s no way to work.
@@EdThorne another great thing about my Focal is that my mixes translate very accurate to the real world, and I must confess, I’ve got no room treatment at all. Probably I’m used to it!!
You've built nice little resonators to put them boxes on. I can bet that raised surface hums along somewhere in the range you described, unless you get the monitors off your desk you won't get that range right. Maybe some speakers will be less sensitive to boundary resonance and interference (coaxial Designs or non-ported boxes), but that doesn't mean there isn't still a problem there.
I’ve had them on isolator pucks - same problem. Space limitations prohibits mounting speakers anywhere else otherwise I’d be doing this.
@@EdThorneyou can mount to the wall, from the ceiling, get stands directly behind the desk, or at least isolation stands
Interesting to hear your thoughts. Best of luck with your new business! Hope it is going well!
PS As a former engineer, I would recommend that you find a speaker and get to know it well. Rapport with a lower quality speaker leads to better mixes than you can get with higher quality speakers with which you have little rapport.
I am not in a pro studio but am full time working in audio since March this year. I am just about to upgrade from Adam F7 (which I had for the last 8 years) to the Adam A7Vs as I did notice that the F7 have been holding me back in the recent months. I can go to the 8s due to my room being smaller and I need front facing sub ports as the speakers are right up to the wall.
I also use Sonarworks and I have to say it's a good tool but it's not fixing major issues. I now mostly use it to reference the mix and the midrange once the mix is almost done, mixing through Sonarworks has cause me ear fatigue like crazy.
Assuming you have tried to move your listening location? In the experience I had was quite crucial.
However, until December 22 my KRK RP8 were spot on for the room size I had. Now in the (smaller) new room I have I had to change for a smaller drive which is Kali Audio lp6 which better result. Still not there but is a good start and definitely better than the previous.
Yeh, I’ve tried numerous positions that space will allow and even had a professional acoustician in to advise and help position the desk/speakers, etc. short of re-building the room from the shell up (which I can’t because it’s not my studio) I think I’ve exhausted all options.
That was a smart decision to downsize the driver for the smaller room👌
@@EdThorne You must be understandably exhausted indeed as those things they completely shake your brain.
Hope you will find a valid solution.
Yes smaller drive made the difference so far but need more treatment.
Cheers from Leyton
Went on my own 2 year journey about 6 years back. I don't have a true pro audio shop here in town so the Neumanns were front runners for me, along with a hi-fi speaker or 2. Finally, I decided to hop a train and go to a real shop with a demo room. I got to AB the Neumanns with PSIs, Genelecs, ATCs, and a few other top names. In the end it was night and day for me, I chose a pair of PSIs. And it was the natural mid range clarity that sold me. Still working long hours on those speakers and they were probably the best investment that I have made on my mixing journey. Best of luck with yours my man
PSIs and Ex Machina’s are in another league! Incredible speakers. ATCs are also lush. Genelecs are a bit clinical for me. Neumann’s are no where near the quality.
@@EdThorne solid solid list right there. It was the frequency response of the PSIs that sold me but their timing accuracy that has really been the deal changer for me. Compression times are so much easier to judge without the time domain smearing caused by lesser speakers. Enjoy the new audio world that you have just opened for yourself
I upgraded from Focal to ATCs and it was a night and day difference. I'm doing a mix in 2 hours now that sounds miles better than a mix that took me 5 hours a couple months ago. It definitely could be a monitoring issue you're dealing with. If mids are an issue, PMC and ATCs are absolutely the best midrange highlighting speakers I've heard.
I will also say, the KH120s are such a small speaker which means they'll be bottled up in the mids. Getting a bigger, 3 way speaker with a larger cabinet will definitely help open the midrange a little bit. The 310s and 420s sound drastically different than the 120s to me.
Try Eve Audio SC2070's without any room correction - they have a perfect balance right off the box. I have them and passive Auratones with a bettermaker amp - this combo is amazing. I mix first 20% on Eves, then I do all the balancing, compression, automation, effects and additional eq moves to shape the mid mids a bit better on Auratones and then I come back in the end to Eves to check the upper mid details and the bass listening with higher volume. In the end I do some quick AB with my references on Beyerdynamics DT880 Pro and last tiny 0.25-1.5dB moves to make it sound 100% on par with my references.
also it's a good idea to start a mix with a lower volume on your main full-range monitors to focus on the mids and a high mids more.The bass checks should be done listening very loud from my experience.
Yeh, I start quiet and check the bass activation in the room every now and then bu increasing the volume.
If you look at professional mixes made by Bob Cleamountain that sound great, they also look like being low in the mids in True Balance. So take that metering with a pinch of salt.
I’ve never tested other people’s mixes in True Balance, this is a great idea. Thanks.
Im using a pair of cheap m-audio bx8 d3's with sonarworks on the master chain , my problem is around 2k , my mixes are scooped around that range , and by scooped i mean 4-3db scoop , sometimes even worse , i never had the same problem with the smaller bx5's , i have a pair of T7Vs as my 2nd pair to help a/b between my mains , i think the problem could be the distance between me & my monitors , so ill be getting smaller Neumann Kh 80s to help with that , lol yes neumanns
The KH80s are the best speaker Neumann make imo. Your 2k dip is probably where the cross over is and they haven’t compensated for it with DSP. Generally the case with cheaper speakers.
That makes perfect sense since they crossover at 1.9khz , tried to fix that with sonarworks but my mixes still aren't translating , KH 80s it is then , thanks Ed 👊🏽
Every speaker has a sound and everyone's ears receive frequencies differently, period. It's definitely an important journey to find what works *for your own ears* rather than what an analyzer or some gear reviewer tells you.
Exactly this!
you said it all , and same for audio interface and why i do not follow dudes like Krause, specs are one thing but how you can work with something in the real context of a studio and get excellent results compared to other devices is much more important
I realized just how important speaker sound was a couple months ago. I've been over to my friend's studio a couple times to film some content with him and his speakers are much more dull than my speakers. To the point I usually can't hear small details on them when we film mic shootouts. He has just now noticed that the dullness of his speakers are affecting his mixes as well and he is looking to upgrade. Hard to get the results you want when you can't fully hear what you are doing!
What’s he got over there? My first mix out of my new speakers was dull because I wasn’t used to having such spacious top end🤣 Have corrected this quickly though.
@@EdThorne I don't remember what he has sadly 🤣😭
I'm considering the Antelope Atlas i8 to upgrade from Focal Evo, were you able to listen to them?
Yeh, they’re good speakers. Very good bass and dispersion.
@@EdThorne thanks!
I would tend to think that sonarworks calibration would have tremendously helped, esp. since it involves auditioning your room with the provided mic.
If your room is so resonant at a specific frequency, maybe its treatment needs to be adapted. That being said, there are no "neutral" monitors, all have their color, and you should pick the color that feels the most natural to you, then spend hours listening to music on them, to teach your brain what "normal" music sound like in your room. Then you're ready to mix/master on your monitors, as your brain will make you target the new "normal"
Even with Sound iD the speakers simply didn’t work for me in my room. The new speakers are working beautifully in the same environment.
@@EdThorne Very interesting. Thanks for the feedback 🙂
I have a friend who spent quite a bit on trying to make his room right. He found out that there's a 200 htz node in his room that he can't take out even with insulation, reflectors, and eq. He even got advice from a company that got made his bass traps.
After hearing about all the crap he went through and knowing I wouldn't be able to spend even half as much as he did. I'm going to go with some really nice head phones and a DAC
Headphones do eliminate room problems but your room may not be as problematic as your friend’s. Some small placement/height adjustments and first reflection treatments can go a long way. Also, no room is perfect. I’ve been in $Million studios in LA with problems… (albeit only small problems).
Yep, monitoring is crucial. And it is very common thing when certain speakers work well for some people in certain environments, and for some people don't. Have seen it so many times with other people. Would be fun to see what you ended up with!
In hind sight I should have purchased the monitors before the analog gear but you love and learn. The “reveal video” will be part 4 of this series.
@@EdThorne well, we humans are not a very rational bunch. I think I get this type of realization at least once a month. :)
I had a low mid issue with the Neumann too. I also couldn't hear small EQ and Compession changes.. I was over compressing as a result.. Upgraded to Amphion one15s. Not the best sounding for general listening but they make issues in a mix undeniable and they translate. I can finally pass the car test. What did you end up choosing?
We currently use 7 Kh310, 3 kh879 and 4 kh120.. we can’t use the DSP anyhow in that setup and the sonarworks is a ridiculous system that takes up an hour of our time per calibration..
Do yourself a favour explore Trinnov, even if you don’t do atmos like us. It’s a one pulse solution and we need it as we calibrate twice a day, turn on and after lunch..
Neumann are incredible, but you’re not paying ATC money, you won’t get ATC quality.
Good video, for is we trust the room now so happy and that’s the secret - trusting your room;)
ATC for me… there no other speaker that translates and sound like it, I mena I recently tested the pmc6-2 and they’re awesome but on a different way…
ATCs are lush in the mid range. PMC6-2s have THE tightest low end I’ve ever heard! I love the sound of them.
I have PMC 6-02 and ill never turn back. Amazing.
Great speakers!
I used to have this issue with the Yamaha Hs Series. Right now I'm looking for a new set of studio monitors.
Speakers like the HS’s and Adam TV series are fantastic for the money but I find they lack any depth of sound and sound flat. What might you upgrade to?
@@EdThorne I was talking to an associate from Sweetwater and He'd recommend the Kali IN-8 or the new line of Focal Alpha's. I'm going to do some research.
Whatever you do, make sure make a VERTICAL move, not a lateral move. @@haroldbones84
I understand a speakers frequency response not jiving with you but my question is with the room correction, dsp, treated room and the like I guess how different can things really be speaker to speaker?
I feel like you could get a genelec for example run all the processing get them set up with your acoustician and set a tilt curve on them and end up with effectively the same issue you have with the Neumanns
Anyone here has the pmc Result 6? I'm thinking about ordering those and the Neumann kh310's and than choose. I do have a sub that I'd probably use together woth the Pmc's. Mostly doing piano based music production and mixing.
The speakers might be the most important gear in the room. Always have a pair of Yamahas in the room, and a pair of lower middy speakers,genelec,focal,etc.
@@FredDeMassiveAlambic I am not referring to NS10’s specifically,HS7s are also a great choice for detecting harsh frequencies
@@FredDeMassiveAlambic I would definitely keep the Yamahas for at least a little while until you get used to the Neumanns. From my understanding the Neumanns are very warm so you’re getting two very different sound signatures there. Keep to see if it’s beneficial,if you feel like it’s not then sell
I use them with Babyface regular. Do you think I need the Sub even for a very small room? For listening to music mostly, and guitar playing. Is the sub worth that much, just for listening pressure? Cheers!
Link to the podcast in your description doesn’t work for me. 404 error.
Thanks. Will amend ASAP.
I use the KH80s with the KH750 sub and they do well, but the most accurate playback I have is through the NDH 30 headphones. The interface matters, too. I have found a pretty big difference in DACs and the Metric Halo ULN-8 3D Mk IVs work really well for me.
The 80s are Neumann’s best speaker in my opinion. And I still use the 750 with its room correction. Yeh, I’ve learned how huge conversion is. I can’t improve on my X16 atm.
Kh 750 has built-in DAC as it can connect digital input.
@@jianhuang0124 It does but that makes it hard to control the level without losing bits. Also, the MH ULN-8 3d Mk IV converters sound a lot better, even with the extra conversion.
@@edwinhurwitz6792 unfortunately even you have a 10 thousand dollar DAC, kh 750 will still do the AD and DA conversion internally. Basically you cannot bypass the DAC
@@jianhuang0124 I completely understand that. What you also can't get around is that if you attenuate the signal digitally when you connect digitally to the KH750 and attenuate the volume so it doesn't take your head off, you are losing the 24 bit signal and it becomes a lower bit depth. Having tried both, I prefer sending an analog signal to the KH750. If they had created a way to control the level from the speaker array, then it would probably sound better, but they did not. I don't like losing resolution. YMMV.
My Focal Alpha Evo 6.5's elevated my mixes and were $ well spent.
What did you have before?
Great vid looking forward to the next one
Thanks, Ricky. PDP MUM8 interview next week, then the speaker comparison video. 🔥
Using focal alpha evo 65 with apollo x4 for a while I find them less revealing for mixing was thinking to upgrade to shape twins .any suggestions?
As with anything in audio, you get what you pay for. I believe the Twins are a level up from the Evo65s so you will get better fidelity, clarity, and depth of sound.
Interesting how that's now 2 engineers I know that have had issues mixing on the neumanns 🤔 I have to agree though, listening to your mixes in your room with the neumanns didn't show up the things that me and Marcel both heard on our setups.
I think the key to this is that you've tried a lot of different speakers in that room and had MUCH better results which removes the argument of the room. Looking at your sonarworks measurement, it's actually not that bad at all and it's SUPER DEAD.
If you had the same recurring issues with other speakers then you'd know it was the room or your ears but having night and day results tells you that it's the speakers sonic character not working for you.
I know guys that DESPISE KRK's where there are others that still mix on them.
Monitoring is very personal as everyones ears are different.
Spot on, Paul! I can’t wait for you to hear the new speakers (especially once Trinnov arrives).
It really doesn't remove the argument of the room. What he is hearing is a pairing of the speakers and the room - it's never either / or but both. As a range the Neumanns are considered reasonably flat this is the first time I've heard someone describe them as having a low mid focus bump. That's not my own experiences (with KH150s - there's no mid range bumps showing in my room) and I haven't seen anything like that on frequency response curves on reputable speaker review sites either.
They are arguably quite boring speakers to listen to as nothing is hyped. The NDH30 headphones have the the same sonic character as their speakers and Sonarworks own plots of those headphones show a very flat response below 1khz. If he was hearing that bump on those then that's either his hearing or he prefers a something that sounds less flat - which many people do.
What his Sonarworks plots seemed to show was significant problems in the low end - there's a bump followed by a far bigger dip there than his low mid boost. That is going to screw with your perceptions of levels when mixing and make the mids seem even more pronounced. The problem with Sonarworks is it basically applies an eq to your speakers. But that eq change can't correct all the acoustic shenanigan's going on in a room. It's a shame that the software doesn't allow you to remeasure once its corrections have been applied so you can actually see what has changed at the listening position - it kind of lulls you into a sense that everything has been sorted when it hasn't. I like using it with headphones but have never found it useful with speakers.
Possibly the fairly neutral response of the Neumans coupled with his room characteristics has been causing him to boost the lows and the highs
Like you say - speaker choice is a very personal one. If he's found something that suits his preferences and his room better then that's great I have no problem with that. But I think he has done the Neumanns a bit of disservice
@@robincandy7064 ruclips.net/video/Z-Jde0Rb90o/видео.htmlsi=4m4SGPNP59VTY7Ba
Another engineer I know who ended up moving to another speaker. Worked on the neumanns for over 2 years.
Few comments on that video seemed to agree with him.
Don't get me wrong, I've not got anything against neumann, I'm just going from what I've heard in Ed's room and Andris's experience.
I just don't get how the room would be THAT much of an issue after correction. I get that stuff like sonarworks is just an eq fix and still doesn't fix the interaction in the room, just a band aid, but that wouldn't explain why he didn't have those same issues with PMC, barefoot, PSI, ATC, ex machina and the present day production speakers. 6 different speakers, all in the same room and he couldn't replicate the issues he had with the neumanns.
Surely that's a telling sign no?
@@PaulThird The other guy really doesn't seem to be describing the same issue as Ed Thorne they just happen to be the same speakers. His speaker setup for the Neumanns certainly isn't optimal though he may have tested them in a different position. So with the best will we're dealing with opinions from a couple of people. I doubt there's any speakers that don't have their fair share of people that don't like them
I would say in some instances that people can be disappointed with the Neumanns because they aren't used to listening on flat speakers which is fine.
I really don't have an issue with Ed Thorne liking or not liking the Neumanns. We're all different.
But like I've said my own experience (and measurements using REW) as well as Sonarworks) and the frequency response graphs that I've seen from sources that I trust don't show the issues that Ed Thorne said he could hear. I trust the science of those graphs. So something else must be at play. I think its a shame that some people may go away from this video and possibly discount the Neumanns as a monitor choice because they think the mids are hyped on them - when there is measurement data out there which says they are not.
I get what you are saying with the graphs as audio science review measured them pretty much bang on flat, which would lead everybody to believe that it's the room but then that wouldn't explain why Ed didn't hear the issues with 6 other speakers which cost like 3 times as much.
Surely if the neumanns are ruler flat and super high quality and the speakers he's compared them to are very high quality and well respected within the industry.. Then surely he'd hear the same issue?
Or perhaps it's the neumann dsp (which he told me sounded better than Sonarworks) 🤷♂️ I'm not entirely sure but I do find it interesting that he had an issue with the neumanns and only heard the issues in his mixes me and our mastering engineer heard when he demo'd the other speakers.
Or it could possibly be a phase issue but I would need to read more into it. That's the only other thing I can think of.
Theres definitely a reason but why that is... God knows 🤷♂️
At the end of the day, he's got a set of speakers now which have solved his translation problems so that's the main thing at the end of the day.
I got gene 8351b’s and I couldn’t be happier
You said at the beginning of the video that the Room mas treated for Drums, with a Lot of absorving Panels, well, that May be the Problem, with a dead Room you May tend to push the Middle range even more that is needed because the Room is eating those frecuencies.
I had Yamaha speakers then i moved to Adams, its DynAudio BM6A passive speakers and i am home
It’s really strange I’m getting good translation but I’m using the kh150 not. Weird you where needing to push the mids so much i tend to over doo the mids 🤣. Neumann working for me but I’m nit in a treated room . Relying on the calibration for home mixing. Anyways the Psi’sd are epic. Have you tried the A17m’s? I was considering them but I’m thinking the calibration in the Neumann more useful for a home/ living room mixer. The psi would be waisted in my room.
My KSDigital A200 mk 2 are fantastic. They go down to 20 hz, so I don’t need a sub. And they sound fantastic.
I’ve not heard of these, I’ll check them out. 20Hz at what dB output?
@@EdThorne sorry, its 28-22khz on -3 dB
And they are very precise on the location of the panning
I'm sitting here, watching with my small cheap logitech speaker and ath-m40x
Do I want to upgrade? Absolutely
When thou? I don't know hahaha
Don't even have a budget to buy budget monitor 😭
I understand the struggle, trust me, I’ve been there. Try not buying a plugin for a year and see how much budget you have 🤘
I'm curious if you're using reference tracks and make your mixes sound like them, doesn't that mean that your choices for reference tracks also translate badly?
People should stick to what they can do best! Neumann should to microphones! Mackie to mixers etc. The best montors are (and always will be) Genelec.
Have you checked ATC or PSI? I have the PSI A23. I love them.
Check out my latest videos. 👌🔥 PSIs rule!