No wake, the ship isnt moving. The wingspan would take out the bridge, and a C-17 does not have a tail hook. So in reality, if the pilot were actually lucky enough to hit the deck, the right wing would be severed by the bridge and the aircraft would then spin off the deck into the ocean at near the same speed as touchdown.
VERY good simulation. It took me until after the landing to fully realize that this was just a simulation. There actually have been experimental landings of large aircraft on carriers, so I didn't completely dismiss it at first.
@@tomwilbur6439 Yes, real jets CAN reverse by using their reverse thrusters normally used during landing. I have seen a number of videos of large jets reversing for various reasons.
No arrester hook either. And it damn near stalled on approach with no way to go around for another try. Probably would have made one helluva splash when it hit the water I bet. Thanx.
Even more, it turned around and got into a parking spot without ripping it's wings off and/or gouging a huge hole in the island. Imagine what might have happened if it was fully loaded, landing or launching. Good thing it's a game simulation.
Congratulations to you beautiful parking lot of love and blessings to you and landing 🛬 safety i impressed with excellent presentation predict intuition divine power of your support 🤠 May God bless you 🙏💐👍 enjoyed your reading happy birthday princess 🥰 bless you
Not even the best thrust reversers could accomplish that. You might get her down, but you'd have to crane her off. Even if you had Jato rockets attached, and to the best of my knowledge the C-17 isn't designed or rated for those. That's if you could even find any. The lack of them is why the Blue Angels stopped doing the Fat Albert Jato takeoff demos. That and the new C-130s can make that climb on their own.
I think it's BS. A C-17 wouldn't be able to land and take off from an aircraft carrier. In any case, the US Navy has the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey multi-mission, tiltrotor military aircraft with both VTOL and STOL capabilities.
Great video. It shows the incredible advances that have been made in "Photo Shop" technology. This video, like so many others, is a fake....but fun to watch. Don't believe half of what you see as it may well be simply a fabrication.
А что вы удивляетесь. Поставили энергоакомулятору( стояночного тормаза). С 500volvo или Mersede Benz 1844 ld. И окуратнинько притормаживая, усадили. Сей летательный аппарат, на корме авионосца. Главное тренировка. И не ссать.
Instead of a simulated C-17 carrier landing you could have shown actual footage of a C-130 landing on the USS Forrestal from October 1963. C-130 serial no. 149798 ("Look Ma, No Hook") still holds the record of the largest plane to ever land on an aircraft carrier: 29 Touch and Goes, 21 Landings and Unassisted Takeoffs.🤔
Yeah, I thought something was hokey when I see the ocean at the base of the carrier structure in the water LIT UP like with a search light. Agree with most of the comments below regarding the fallacy of this - and I spent YEARS in the IC, as an Army Reservist, working with Navy and Air Force folk, so I figure I learned SOMETHING of observational skills. Now, that said, if you want to hook me into watching more: LET ME SEE IT TAKE OFF FROM THE CARRIER!! THEN you might have something there! 😉t😅
That is a fligt simulator program the carrier is not underway which means there is no wind across the deck. That is a gaint mno-no for carrier flight operations.
Simulators like this don't count. The C-130 (to be picky, a KC-130 tanker version) ACTUALLY LANDED AND TOOK OFF FROM A CARRIER (USS Forestal) several times during some testing in the early 1960s. C-17 wings are too wide, even if it COULD manage the distance.
@@MrRockydee07 - You're talking about a stationary plane with a wingspan of 67 feet, giving it enough clearance from the Island on the USS Hornet and taking off and needing just 70 mph into the wind, compared with plane with a wingspan of almost 170 feet coming in that has a stall speed of 205 mph. And in case you didn't know it, those B-25's didn't land on the carrier, they were hoisted onto it by cranes at the Alameda Naval Air Station just South of Okland.
@@MrRockydee07 - Sorry, I misunderstood you. The way you worded it that made it sound like if a B-25 can do it, a C-17 can which some people actually believe because "I saw it on the Internet so it must be true!" Just read many of the other post which is why I added the "other BS" to show it's ridiculous to believe the video.
If .......IF it was possible, how the hell would they ever get it off. Not long enough for a takeoff with that plane, even with the catapult, which I think would rip itself apart trying to sling something that heavy. Just my opinion. Wasn't in the Navy, never been on an aircraft carrier. I was in the Air Force. Saw lots of C-130s come and go, saw a few C-5As, even saw a couple of Harriers. All were an amazing sight.
I still had to look at it. And I think they did a good job to make it look like it was real, but you know what when I saw the marines jump out of the aircraft that was really impressive to me
C-17 isn't equipped to HAVE arresting gear - and it would probably tear off if they DID try to add it. C-130 testing on the Forestall DID NOT EVEN TRY.
I watched the Marines. Special forces jump out of the aircraft is a jet aircraft and they jump out and they know how to catch it. But I never knew that you cut land this only carry and I never forget they landed. AC130 on the aircraft carried, refilled. Arm that gave an emergency munitions for a troops. In the field, AC130 landed on the carrot. And I think it was quite ambitious and it was accurate
Well THERE'S 2 minutes of my life I'll never get back!
L😂L
Kkkkkk genius
There is no aircraft carrier big enough for a C-17
Someone is going to extraordinaire lengths to make this absurd videos, and this is the second I’ve watched, my bad
lol - u can't tell after 12 sec?
Nice job Captain Miaa - tricked one guy! 🙂😇
Ever seen a C17 parked next to a C130 that's when see how big the C17 is.. the C17 would rip it's wing off on the Carrier island..
C17 land on a British aircraft carrier? NO its all computer! Looks good !
Sim is nice, but TELL the viewers in the title, will-ja!
So many idiots not looking at the "#microsoftflightsimulator"!
Sorry folks, fake. But it looks cool.
It's real.
*No need to be sorry, or to apologize.*
Cartoon
C est flagrant c est faux 😅
Is it impossible?
No wake, the ship isnt moving. The wingspan would take out the bridge, and a C-17 does not have a tail hook. So in reality, if the pilot were actually lucky enough to hit the deck, the right wing would be severed by the bridge and the aircraft would then spin off the deck into the ocean at near the same speed as touchdown.
photo shopping or AI, as you said, also the guy next to the nose of the plane never moved or guided the plane in
Браво!🙂🤝
Оставьте посылку возле двери. Спасибо!
True! I was nearby mermaid fishing from one of Shaq's old basketball shoes when this really happened.
That's a big shoe.
Catch anything?
@@richardshirley2786 He caught a mermaid but it was underage, but he ate her anyway.
@@Sugarsail1 L😂L
@@michaelrogers25 :
If you landed any mermaids, send me a pic. 😉
VERY good simulation. It took me until after the landing to fully realize that this was just a simulation. There actually have been experimental landings of large aircraft on carriers, so I didn't completely dismiss it at first.
Nothing larger than a KC-130 (tanker version of the Hercules).
The giveaway was that the carrier wasn't moving at all, let alone like a hydroplane on steroids to land that flying boxcar .
Never knew airplanes had reverse ,
@@tomwilbur6439 Yes, real jets CAN reverse by using their reverse thrusters normally used during landing. I have seen a number of videos of large jets reversing for various reasons.
@@tomwilbur6439 Thrust reversers don't work well, but they do work and are normal on all transport jets that I know of.
Impossible. Not in the real world. Wake up.
Would never happen,a air force cargo plane landing on a navy aircraft carrier
It’s video game footage.....
HAHAHA NO Thrust reversal working when landing and reversing.
No arrester hook either. And it damn near stalled on approach with no way to go around for another try. Probably would have made one helluva splash when it hit the water I bet. Thanx.
Even more, it turned around and got into a parking spot without ripping it's wings off and/or gouging a huge hole in the island. Imagine what might have happened if it was fully loaded, landing or launching. Good thing it's a game simulation.
Back in '86, the Air Force had a C-130 video and it did show a 130 landing on a carrier.
You would think everybody would know these are simulators by now. Come on people!
Looks neat, C-17 sounds pretty realistic too. Hope you guys had fun with this.
Congratulations to you beautiful parking lot of love and blessings to you and landing 🛬 safety i impressed with excellent presentation predict intuition divine power of your support 🤠 May God bless you 🙏💐👍 enjoyed your reading happy birthday princess 🥰 bless you
Can't wait to see the takeoff.
Not even the best thrust reversers could accomplish that. You might get her down, but you'd have to crane her off. Even if you had Jato rockets attached, and to the best of my knowledge the C-17 isn't designed or rated for those. That's if you could even find any. The lack of them is why the Blue Angels stopped doing the Fat Albert Jato takeoff demos. That and the new C-130s can make that climb on their own.
Fake
I think it's BS.
A C-17 wouldn't be able to land and take off from an aircraft carrier.
In any case, the US Navy has the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey multi-mission, tiltrotor military aircraft with both VTOL and STOL capabilities.
It is just a video game. Check out the other videos on this channel 😅
Good animation, but not going to happen in real world situation. Sorry folks but a C-17 can not land on an air craft carrier.
Maybe in the future but not today. Nice animation.
Let me quote Elaine Benes: "Fake.....Fake.....Fake......Fake, Fake!
So many idiots not looking at the "#microsoftflightsimulator"!
Gee, I thought it was real. 🙄
I was thumbs up number 996...text book STOL landing!😊
A good simulator game
Ufff what perfect landing great
Nice sim.
Thanks sbrenner
変な止まり方
You forgot the people in the background.
Great cartoon
I like to play toys too😂😂😂
Great video. It shows the incredible advances that have been made in "Photo Shop" technology. This video, like so many others, is a fake....but fun to watch. Don't believe half of what you see as it may well be simply a fabrication.
You have to admit the animation is top shelf😮
Nice job, explain how it's going to take off.
Dios Bendiga a Los USA Y A SU EJERCITO
It's always fun to watch CGI - this one's HILARIOUS!!!😅😅 @MIAA you need to attach a "CLICK-BAIT" disclaimer!! 🤣🤣🤣
Nice animation but a C-17 is a hulk of an aircraft, only thing bigger is a C-5.
The greatest act of bravery.🇮🇳🙋♂
This is a game video. But would be quite a feat if possible. Thnx😊
I served U.S. Navy U.S.S. America CV-66
Nice, but you forgot to mention that you / AI created that scene.
So rare,it will never happen!😂😅
Great AI! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Hay que mejorar el vídeo. No se ve ni una persona en cubierta - pista. Pero está bastante bien. 🤝👍
It's so rare that it's actually never happened!
Wow, what a Fantastic Pilot!
А что вы удивляетесь. Поставили энергоакомулятору( стояночного тормаза). С 500volvo или Mersede Benz 1844 ld. И окуратнинько притормаживая, усадили. Сей летательный аппарат, на корме авионосца. Главное тренировка. И не ссать.
Its so powerful I like it
Guy: that huge plane is coming toward us take cover! 😨
전투기가 마치 헬리콥터 처럼 랜딩을 하네요 ^^😊
Instead of a simulated C-17 carrier landing you could have shown actual footage of a C-130 landing on the USS Forrestal from October 1963. C-130 serial no. 149798 ("Look Ma, No Hook") still holds the record of the largest plane to ever land on an aircraft carrier: 29 Touch and Goes, 21 Landings and Unassisted Takeoffs.🤔
It's just a simulation, but a good one.
AI looks so real..wow!
Wow. I heard a C5 fitted with VTO thrusters gently set down soon afterward.
They even landed an old space shuttle after that, what a sight...lol
I had one land down my driveway..So i believe it! USA! USA!
Now let me tell you a real story: decades ago a C130 landed on a carrier for testing.
@@amcds2867 :
C-130 without ‘arrestor cables’ and without the help of a catapult to take off.
I find this difficult to believe.
It reminds me of when I used to go to work in a jump-jet parked on our roof.
❤🎉Salutes To Indian🇮🇳 Navy And ✈️️Force❤🎉
Typical of the many reasons why I watch very little RUclips . Keep it actual and factual please .
Impressive C.G.I.
This is amazing, the pilots almost had the plane down to almost stalled in Oder to land, Bravo I give them 10/10.
Yeah, I thought something was hokey when I see the ocean at the base of the carrier structure in the water LIT UP like with a search light. Agree with most of the comments below regarding the fallacy of this - and I spent YEARS in the IC, as an Army Reservist, working with Navy and Air Force folk, so I figure I learned SOMETHING of observational skills. Now, that said, if you want to hook me into watching more: LET ME SEE IT TAKE OFF FROM THE CARRIER!! THEN you might have something there! 😉t😅
una cosa però è strana ... non si vede nessuno sul ponte ... 🤷♂️ bella realizzazione
Yes , me too i think is a fake but animations are good😊
Impossível um avião desse porte pousar na pista de um porta avião.Bonito vídeo, mas não acredito no que acabei de ver.
Most unbelievable part is that an Air Force pilot would have the balls to land on an aircraft carrier. 😅
Nice car park
Extremely rare . So much so, that it did not happen. CGI is super nice however . . .
Agree completely, never would qualify as rare.👍
Now, for it to take off, the carrier would have to get up to about 60 knots before it started its takeoff roll if all of its Jatos fired on time.
Even in a computer game this landing wouldn't be possible without tweaking something.
Nice CGI
Good simulator, looks so much like real…
WOW! What a pilot.
😂 Now let's see it landing at my local Walmart😂
Absolutely real, 4 wire trap 300 to 0 in 6 sec
That is a fligt simulator program the carrier is not underway which means there is no wind across the deck. That is a gaint mno-no for carrier flight operations.
Simulators like this don't count.
The C-130 (to be picky, a KC-130 tanker version) ACTUALLY LANDED AND TOOK OFF FROM A CARRIER (USS Forestal) several times during some testing in the early 1960s.
C-17 wings are too wide, even if it COULD manage the distance.
Yes, B25's took off . That's why they said "Bombs Over Tokyo"
Compare the wingspans and have a nice day!
@@boustro12 ever hear of Doolittle's Raiders
@@MrRockydee07 - You're talking about a stationary plane with a wingspan of 67 feet, giving it enough clearance from the Island on the USS Hornet and taking off and needing just 70 mph into the wind, compared with plane with a wingspan of almost 170 feet coming in that has a stall speed of 205 mph. And in case you didn't know it, those B-25's didn't land on the carrier, they were hoisted onto it by cranes at the Alameda Naval Air Station just South of Okland.
@joed9491 That's exactly what I'm saying only about the B25's look off from the carrier only. What's going on with other bullshit your adding .
@@MrRockydee07 - Sorry, I misunderstood you. The way you worded it that made it sound like if a B-25 can do it, a C-17 can which some people actually believe because "I saw it on the Internet so it must be true!" Just read many of the other post which is why I added the "other BS" to show it's ridiculous to believe the video.
Good editing
ANOTHER video I was daft enough to watch!! ,,,,,,, BAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH
Very funny. Now let make it land on a kayak.
Beautiful CGI landing
Hmmm. Amazing what can be done with..PHOTOSHOP
It looks like a CG but a good idea.
Amazing
You would never see a C-17 landing on a Queen Elizabeth class carrier. Too small. And the Royal Navy would never allow it.
My youngest son even knows it's game.
If .......IF it was possible, how the hell would they ever get it off. Not long enough for a takeoff with that plane, even with the catapult, which I think would rip itself apart trying to sling something that heavy. Just my opinion. Wasn't in the Navy, never been on an aircraft carrier. I was in the Air Force. Saw lots of C-130s come and go, saw a few C-5As, even saw a couple of Harriers. All were an amazing sight.
Wow, die Air Force landet nie auf einem Marineschiff.
Billige Spielerei.
Hey, nice. I am VERY happy this is your day job and NOT SAVING LIVES😂
The best pilot action
This is the most amusing thing I've seen today 😂😂😂😂😂
Wow, people think that’s C5 has a tail hook? Air Force just land locked sailors. So much AI bull shot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I still had to look at it. And I think they did a good job to make it look like it was real, but you know what when I saw the marines jump out of the aircraft that was really impressive to me
It was once successfully done with a C-130 and immediately deemed to be unfeasible.
They did the same thing with a C 130 land and took off from one of the aircraft carriers back in the mid 1960 and still can even at this day
I’m sorry I worked at MD when the C17 was built. There’s no reverse. This is.just one of the issues with this fantasy game scenario
If it could land, which it can’t, it could never take off.
Thank goodness they are developing artificial intelligence; the real thing has left the building for good...
Yep! It's very rare for some people to be truthful in their titles and thumbnails.
U had me---up until I realized there's nobody on the flight deck 2 guide this Big Husky.
Nope
Guess the Navy can keep their Ospreys ground!
Clever spoof but all credit for a good job
It even caught the first wire...impressive landing.
C-17 isn't equipped to HAVE arresting gear - and it would probably tear off if they DID try to add it.
C-130 testing on the Forestall DID NOT EVEN TRY.
Well that was a goddam miracle, wow !
I watched the Marines. Special forces jump out of the aircraft is a jet aircraft and they jump out and they know how to catch it. But I never knew that you cut land this only carry and I never forget they landed. AC130 on the aircraft carried, refilled. Arm that gave an emergency munitions for a troops. In the field, AC130 landed on the carrot. And I think it was quite ambitious and it was accurate
위험 한 착륙.
날씨가 도와 줬다!
안전하게 하길~~~!!!
Not an Ameriocan aircraft carrier. It is British. Tail on C17 reads Memphis. If real ANG, probbly should read Tennessee.