Ryzen 5 1600 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Test in 3D Render

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 янв 2025

Комментарии • 12

  • @InuPf
    @InuPf 6 лет назад +16

    Thank you for testing.
    11% faster. But 40 ~ 50 % more expensive.
    I was interested in this test because there’s a huge sale going on today on a PC Store in my country, which basically express the price gap I mentioned above.
    I’m gonna get a 1600 then.

    • @brn6785
      @brn6785 5 лет назад +4

      Se não for Brasil mentiu.

    • @marcossluzala1708
      @marcossluzala1708 4 года назад

      @@brn6785 kkkk ok !! esse seria o af?

  • @ZeaLK1610
    @ZeaLK1610 5 лет назад +1

    Would the 2600 stock heatsink be enough? Wouldn't there be heating problems? (Text translated to English)

    • @AUKANstudios
      @AUKANstudios  5 лет назад

      Hi, it depends a lot on the ambient temperature. But if the equipment were used with high demand to the CPU, it could be convenient to use a more powerful cooler that draws the air back from the cabinet.

  • @AndriVision
    @AndriVision 4 года назад +1

    will be best if you put stopwatch in real time, so I know how fast the rendering was.

  • @shakibsaifi9312
    @shakibsaifi9312 5 лет назад

    can you suggest me a budget gpu for 3ds max and vray rendering ?

  • @imnotmark3053
    @imnotmark3053 4 года назад

    With correct ram specifically 3200mhz the 1600 af outperform the 2600

  • @IvarsONE
    @IvarsONE 5 лет назад

    Not Bad :D

  • @sebastiankonigsperger8237
    @sebastiankonigsperger8237 5 лет назад +1

    I get 1220cb. Should i be worried?

  • @satyanarayandebbarma2089
    @satyanarayandebbarma2089 5 лет назад

    Psu use plz