The Professor does take the long route to get to his point, but often the anecdotes are worth it. He also brings together the thinking of scholars from a wide scattering of settings, eg Grammci, the Italian Marxist and Edward Said, the ME historian. Their insights form the intellectual framework for Bulliet's observations.
he commentator below takes a positive slant, but to me the title is a misnomer for: ruminations, mainly about US and middle eastern history, to which some thoughts about British India are appended, but not related to. Recommended for US citizens and those willing to become so.
like really, it took forever to acctually get into the lesson that i lost interest, and just took a 0 on the assignment. edit the videos so that the stuff not pertaining to the subject, isnt in it
The Professor does take the long route to get to his point, but often the anecdotes are worth it. He also brings together the thinking of scholars from a wide scattering of settings, eg Grammci, the Italian Marxist and Edward Said, the ME historian. Their insights form the intellectual framework for Bulliet's observations.
This is an incredible lecture. Thank you, Professor Bulliet and whoever else helped with this.
he commentator below takes a positive slant, but to me the title is a misnomer for: ruminations, mainly about US and middle eastern history, to which some thoughts about British India are appended, but not related to. Recommended for US citizens and those willing to become so.
Fascinating ❤️
Fantastic 👌🏻
5s
In a lecture about india he spends 25 minutes talking about anything but.
It is only to be expected that an expert on the ME will grab any opportunity to address that subject. Unfortunately.
1:06:26 :D
like really, it took forever to acctually get into the lesson that i lost interest, and just took a 0 on the assignment. edit the videos so that the stuff not pertaining to the subject, isnt in it
Idiot...