Why Skyscrapers Should be Made of Wood

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
  • 📬 Join our newsletter for more cool content! bit.ly/3RhfUUs
    In the last decade, there’s been a movement towards using wood to build skyscrapers via cross laminated timber construction. Why is that? The biggest reasons behind this are environmental factors and structural integrity of wood. Plus, thanks to advancements in building cross laminated timber, it's become sturdier and more fire resistant and a high quality material to build. Even though it's more expensive than steel and concrete, it could be a great option for developers and leads to much quicker building times because wood construction allows for much more prefabrication. As population increases and urbanization is the future of building cities, wood buildings could be a game changer and lead to a future of wooden skyscrapers. What are your thoughts?
    ✅ SUBSCRIBE
    bit.ly/3JBTgUk
    💸 Shop Amazon deals here: amzn.to/3LEQ5dX
    🔴 Programs we use and recommend:
    ➽ TubeBuddy legend - best for A/B testing: www.tubebuddy....
    ➽ VidIQ Boost - best for keywords & trends: vidiq.com/Jacob
    #Skyscraper #Construction #Architecture

Комментарии • 115

  • @urbaninternational
    @urbaninternational  Год назад

    Our email link is here! bit.ly/3RhfUUs

  • @imkey
    @imkey Год назад +10

    It's very important to note that this is engineered wood product, not 100% lumber from tree. There is significant usage of glues and epoxies as binders. These binders and adhesives have their own issues in scaling up production. It is not accurate to state it is just trees which is the source material whereas a lot of additional binders are needed. The cost and environmental impact of these binders needs to be taken into consideration.

  • @InvestBetter.
    @InvestBetter. Год назад +4

    I'm all for it, if you can engineer around the traditional issues with tall wood structures:
    Fire, termites and other insects, wood rot and sway

  • @joestewart8914
    @joestewart8914 Год назад +39

    How tasty would termites find these buildings? I'm sure that carpenter bees would appreciate such luxurious digs, too.

    • @user-ln5il4un3x
      @user-ln5il4un3x Год назад +2

      Yeah

    • @Illisil
      @Illisil 6 месяцев назад

      Wood cutter ants would be regular tenants of these structures as well

  • @alienamzal477
    @alienamzal477 Год назад +9

    Just 8 videos on the whole channel, cant believe the great quality of these videos. You and your team are going places

  • @mpaulm
    @mpaulm Год назад +10

    My city, Edmonton, builds apartments out of wood that are four floors high. I’d be nervous about anything higher than that.

  • @jmhowlett
    @jmhowlett Год назад +2

    No multifamily building over 3 stories should be made of wood or composite material. All it takes is a fire between the ceilings and floors to disable the fire sprinkler system. Personally I believe concrete reinforced steel structures are the absolute best and safest ways to build a home and or a skyscraper. Of course places like New York, steel framed buildings are ok but in south Florida only steel reinforced concrete is the norm.

    • @domh1928
      @domh1928 Год назад

      The wood used in these building are resistant to fire. It's not the same type used in standard housing.

  • @CrizzyConnor
    @CrizzyConnor Год назад +8

    Loving the channel, you're growing fast and deserve it. I see a lot of folk have already mentioned the comparisons to B1M and that's a compliment! Also, I love checking the comments to see how many people ask questions that have already been answered in the video 🤣

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      LOL so true about the questions from video. And thank you for watching all the way through and commenting!

  • @josephtoman-xr2qu
    @josephtoman-xr2qu Год назад +2

    I think Insulated concrete forms are the future, for Walls and floors 👍👍

  • @shanekeenaNYC
    @shanekeenaNYC Год назад +7

    My concern is about water, mold and rotting. Especially in low-lying coastal communities, I don't exactly trust the wood to hold up.

    • @brickmack
      @brickmack Год назад

      Since wood is a permeable fiber structure, it can be impregnated with all sorts of resins or glues to waterproof it. These would also often be included to enhance its structural properties anyway. Just think of it as naturally-occuring carbon fiber

    • @shanekeenaNYC
      @shanekeenaNYC Год назад +1

      @@brickmack But what happens when those cements wear down? Because they are going to be worn out at some point.

    • @brickmack
      @brickmack Год назад +2

      @@shanekeenaNYC Then you demolish the building and make a new one. That won't happen for decades

    • @alienamzal477
      @alienamzal477 Год назад +1

      @@shanekeenaNYC the same question can be asked for redular steel and concrete buildings. It takes decades to wear out if done right, and at the end of their lifetime, you have to demolish and rebuild. (Also, who knows if we have some new outlandish recycling tech when that time comes)

    • @ZoeyZoco
      @ZoeyZoco Год назад +3

      *EXACTLY!* its weird how people who are "environmentally" friendly PUSH wooden skyscrapers when that takes MORE trees to be cut down... like NAH concrete is the way to go. Ancient Greek buildings are still standing today thanks to their version of concrete! *THATS* sustainable!

  • @Rugopoly
    @Rugopoly Год назад +6

    You're my new favorite channel! Keep it up I LOVE every single video!!

  • @herman7880
    @herman7880 Год назад

    7:19 It's actually called the Mjøs Tower. Because it's in the lake named Mjøsa. Tårnet is the Norwegian translation of tower.

  • @freemarkets
    @freemarkets Год назад +1

    Good video, however, I have some thoughts: (1) Skyscrapers are usually defined as being at least 100m or 150m tall, none of the finished buildings are this tall and therefore should be referred to as high rises instead. (2) If you need subsidies to build these, I don't think they will ever become that popular. Governments don't have the money to subsidize that many buildings and people are obviously preferring concrete buildings (for whatever reason), otherwise, no subsidies would be needed to encourage their construction. (3) Scandinavia, Austria or Wisconsin have lots of trees. The vast majority of people, however, live in places with minimal timber availability (China, India, Middle East). Those places will never see wooden buildings.

    • @chaostheory16
      @chaostheory16 Год назад

      Yes, it kinda seems like yet another government boondoggle in the name of “climate change.” It’s now impossible, at least for me, to make heads or tails of what’s legitimate and what’s propaganda. Weird time we live in.

  • @jmhowlett
    @jmhowlett Год назад +7

    Just imagine the damage one crazy person could do within their own apartment, potentially burning down the entire building and everyone above them....

    • @herman7880
      @herman7880 Год назад

      Won't happen if constructed properly.

  • @simonsaysitsok
    @simonsaysitsok Год назад +2

    Fire risk?

  • @Deair2201
    @Deair2201 Год назад

    Can you make a video about Chicago please because Chicago started the skyscraper and has some of the most beautiful iconic skyscrapers with a Skyline that is unmatched

  • @calvinl2149
    @calvinl2149 Год назад +1

    Thanks for the video. I've seen a few other similar videos but it's always nice seeing different ones to get multiple perspectives. I think your video would honestly get more views if the thumbnail and title were more indicative of the topic being wood as a possible future for skyscraper construction. For example, check out the thumbnail and title for PBS News Hour videos - "Is mass timber the building material of the future" or cheddar's "wood skyscrapers are on the rise - cheddar explains".

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад +1

      Thanks for your feedback, I appreciate you taking the time. I'm gonna take this into account and split test the thumbnail to see if I can get one more evocative

  • @cliffwoodbury5319
    @cliffwoodbury5319 Год назад

    One of the points your missing on also if you want to speak on carbon storage is that with the warming polar regions (warming faster than the equatorial regions) methane is being released into the atmosphere and scientist have stated that the arctic used to be grass land and grassland keeps methang in the ground better than trees because they cover all the ground and continually grow, ad scientist have said by returning the polar regions to grasslands would make for a healthier planet. there are probably 100'sof millions of not over a billion trees in the Taiga and by cutting most of them down if they can be converted to grassland at the same time there would be more than enough wood to build countless structures from wood while also helping our planet thrive. And with the opening of these places to the lumber industry there can be stipulations that they have to fix the coutles spaces they destroyed around teh world from strippping whole areas of all their trees, so they would be dong double good by replanting billions of tress in areas that should be forest and then cutting down billions to turn land that was once grasslands back into grasslands.

  • @M.Nazar.Writes
    @M.Nazar.Writes Год назад +1

    Fantastic storyline, keep this great work up. Am waiting for your new feeds and perspective. Ty

  • @pharaoh84
    @pharaoh84 Год назад

    I live in the Fort Lauderdale/Miami area of Florida. My concern would be flooding and wind damage from hurricanes. Also, our ever increasing heat

  • @ChrisPopkin
    @ChrisPopkin Год назад

    Damn, we're actually all here early. Only 7k subs so far. This content is A1. Keep it going!

  • @houseofhas9355
    @houseofhas9355 Год назад +1

    You should cover Boston's new seaport area. New neighborhood and extremely expensive. Fits your content. I live in this city so if you need local insight or Broll footage I got you. Love your channel. Subscribed ❤️

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад +1

      So funny you say that, I have it planned for one of the next videos to post. I went to undergrad at NEU and think seaport is a super interesting neighborhood

  • @cliffwoodbury5319
    @cliffwoodbury5319 Год назад

    London should build the Oak Wood Tower!!!!!!!!

  • @ColinBunston
    @ColinBunston Год назад

    What about earthquake resistance? Is it stronger than concrete with rebar?

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      A lot of the wood buildings still have concrete & rebar in the foundation and core so they're not 100% timber, and I think the structural stability and safety is a big reason why concrete is still used over wood for certain parts of the construction

  • @davidcollins5929
    @davidcollins5929 Год назад

    How safe are wood buildings in earthquake areas?

  • @stasish3967
    @stasish3967 Год назад

    Cool video!

  • @einundsiebenziger5488
    @einundsiebenziger5488 Год назад +1

    Yes, wood has stored CO2 inside which does not get emmitted when when wood is used as building material, but at the same time the cut-down trees cannot absorb CO2 from the atmosphere anymore. So, in times where forests are declining but desperately needed to absorb CO2 and slow down global warming, it does not look like a good idea to cut them down for construction and prevent them from working as "air filters".

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      Did you watch all the way to the section where deforestation is discussed to address that issue?

    • @alienamzal477
      @alienamzal477 Год назад +2

      In the place of the cut down tree, you plant new one. Trees absorb CO2 when they grow.
      Ever heard of the forestry industry? (Not the logging industry, its 2 different things)

    • @xivinrah
      @xivinrah Год назад

      @@urbaninternational it still doesn’t make it sustainable. I need the tree more than I need the building. Wood skyscrapers are a gimmick. I’d rather breathe. People think that because you slap sustainable before the practice that it nullifies the inevitable consequence that it has on the environment. These arguments for wood skyscraper proliferation are argued, I think, on the basis of preference rather than anything legitimate in terms of practicality (to balance the needs of the environment and human settlement).
      I get it. You (and so many other architects) no longer find traditional building materials and architecture stimulating. You want something new… like how Art Deco was new in the early 1900’s. However, this is not the way to do it. It’s time to put the art back in architecture. More critical thought is needed. Wood construction for a global population of over 8 billion is grossly unsustainable and dangerous. I want to breathe.

    • @chaostheory16
      @chaostheory16 Год назад

      @@alienamzal477 how long does it take to grow a new tree the same size as the one you cut down?

    • @alienamzal477
      @alienamzal477 Год назад +1

      @@chaostheory16 so you didnt understand what I said. A Mature tree stores more Carbon, but its rate of absorption of CO2 is much lower than a new tree that is still growing. When you cut down the mature tree and take it to construction, the Carbon stored doesnt go anywhere, it still remains in the wood as Carbon. And it frees up the space for a new tree that will absorb more CO2 as it grows and stores it, then it goes down for construction and a new tree takes its place. This goes in a cycle in a forestry plantation.
      (Iam not talking about just clearing out natural forest, which have this cycle occur naturally. Iam talking about plantations of trees and harvesting them for wood in cycles like you would do for any other crop)

  • @CraftyFoxeMC
    @CraftyFoxeMC Год назад +1

    Architects been playing minecraft

  • @matthook2530
    @matthook2530 Год назад

    Very good video. Thanks

  • @henrysantos121
    @henrysantos121 Год назад +1

    Great video.. well done✓

  • @LeftINtheDUST.
    @LeftINtheDUST. Год назад +1

    So we won't have any forest left 😕.

  • @jps080576
    @jps080576 Год назад +1

    Better start growing forests

  • @bobbbxxx
    @bobbbxxx Год назад +2

    Just my personal opinion, but I don't like the aesthetics of a tall wooden building. They tend to look clunky.

  • @kammore6209
    @kammore6209 Год назад +3

    Um, didn’t we move away from using wood because entire cities were burning down? 🥴

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад +2

      But now we have engineered wood and hybrid products that didn't exist in the past

  • @jameswebbspacetelescope5159
    @jameswebbspacetelescope5159 Год назад +1

    theres a reason why we use steel

  • @stevenlilley8045
    @stevenlilley8045 Год назад

    Ten Billion Earthlings Is Likely

  • @paulotavares9357
    @paulotavares9357 Год назад

    I really don't think that's sustainable at all regarding deforestation. Unless we would be talking about wood recycling.

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      The deforestation remark was meant in regard to countries that have strong re-forestation policy. In others, it's absolutely a big concern with illegal logging and deforestation.

  • @postmodgent1499
    @postmodgent1499 Год назад

    carpenter ants? termites?

  • @indisciipline
    @indisciipline Год назад

    yeah yeah wooden towers would be so cool
    🖥🦫

  • @AOmega72
    @AOmega72 Год назад +1

    🔥Why Skyscrapers Should not be Made of Wood🔥

  • @_Breakdown
    @_Breakdown Год назад +1

    *NOT VERY WISE - - what happens if there's a FIRE in a wooden skyscraper???*

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      Did you not watch up to the point where fire hazards with CLT is discussed in this video?

    • @_Breakdown
      @_Breakdown Год назад +1

      @@urbaninternational no - just watched the first few minutes - - BUT - - i don't see how u could possibly get around that. If u are aware of all the fires that broke out in NYC before building codes were invented - - its very easy to see how fast disasters can emerge when you're dealing w/wood - - ESPECIALLY on the scale of a skyscraper - - its just nuts - - the entire building could collapse within hours. Cheers.

    • @twmcmahan
      @twmcmahan Год назад +1

      @@_Breakdown You should consider watching the video. This concern is addressed and dismissed.

    • @chaostheory16
      @chaostheory16 Год назад +1

      @@twmcmahan I’m not sure I’d say the issue is “dismissed.” How much testing has this really undergone?

  • @thebabbler8867
    @thebabbler8867 7 месяцев назад +1

    Any building built out of wood is *beyond stupid* , it's just better to live in a tree than to live in a building made out of wood. 😂

  • @TheNoerdy
    @TheNoerdy Год назад +1

    Hahaha how many people here just want more B1M content lol

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      Hahaha idk if that's a good thing or bad thing, but B1m is a channel I definitely take inspiration from

    • @TheNoerdy
      @TheNoerdy Год назад

      @@urbaninternational Definitely a good thing! You make great content for your size.

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      @@TheNoerdy Thank you

  • @jonathanprice805
    @jonathanprice805 Год назад

    Would you sell your channel?

  • @Goxilla
    @Goxilla Год назад

    0:07 different times I guess

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      I'm not sure what you mean by that

    • @Goxilla
      @Goxilla Год назад

      @@urbaninternational construction worker balancing on a steel beam without any safety measures

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад

      Ah yes, very different safety standards these days for sure!

  • @narcisavaldehueza5491
    @narcisavaldehueza5491 Год назад

    Please send me mansion for sale now!!!

  • @ZoeyZoco
    @ZoeyZoco Год назад

    *SORRY* but no thanks... Stick to concrete. Just look at Ancient Greek buildings that are still standing today.. Thanks to their version of concrete.

  • @maxhi88
    @maxhi88 Год назад

    CO2 is necessary.

  • @jtgd
    @jtgd Год назад

    I bet after 75 years, they’ll transition to stone skyscrapers

    • @urbaninternational
      @urbaninternational  Год назад +1

      What if we just came full circle and went back to concrete skyscrapers but poured the entire building out of concrete not just the foundation

    • @alienamzal477
      @alienamzal477 Год назад

      @@urbaninternational like 3D printing out of concrete? That would be an interesting topic for another video. I remember seeing one about a 2 storey house that was 3D printed out of a Cement like solution, cant remember the channel I saw it in

  • @alimeharaz3674
    @alimeharaz3674 Год назад +1

    Bro…. Not for a skyscraper lol for buildings up to 10 floors bt thats it