Uwe Boll on Paul Thomas Anderson and Terrence Malick
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- Filmmaker Uwe Boll reacts to the work of Paul Thomas Anderson (Boogie Nights, Magnolia, There Will Be Blood, Phantom Thread) and Terrence Malick.
Source: The Movies That Made Me hosted by Josh Olson & Joe Dante
Apple:
podcasts.apple...
Spotify:
open.spotify.c...
Huge balls on Uwe to criticize PTA and Malick considering his filmography. You almost have to admire him 😂
He's Europe's Michael Bay with smaller budgets. Of course he thinks their stuff is masturbatory and tedious. Plot twist.. He's not wrong.
@@ryanlikesyou2006another plot twist… you are wrong! 😉
You’re saying you want to admire Uwe’s balls? 🤔 😅
@@ryanlikesyou2006Strangely enough, I'd rather be directed by Uwe than Michael Bay, who has had many complaints of being short tempered and a jerk on set, and forget the fact that he once cast a barely legal Megan Fox to dance in the nightclub scene of Bad Boys 2. MB is a bit of a creep unlike Uwe.
I think Uwe should make every movie from now on.
The irony of Uwe accusing PTA & Malick of making bad movies. Perhaps if The Tree of Life or Phantom Thread were based on video games 🤔.
Uwe Boll is always digging deep and delivering stunning film criticism
Uwe Boll is entertaining, to put it one way.
His letterboxd termination was one of the greatest tragedies of the 21st century🥀
@@Noproblem396True. His review of Michael Mann's Miami Vice was the best lol
We already have plenty of daring filmakers what we actually need are more daring critics out there such as Uwe Boll😎🔥
‘It’s about greed’ wow what a great eye for subtext
He's a deep thinker. I never even picked up on that!
Nothing gets past this guy lmao
lol I remember that interview, very funny and entertaining, Uwe has always something interesting and not obvious to say.
I love all Mallick movies but this is still very funny.
I love tree of life so much but then I saw knight of cups and was like “oh god is this what people who think tree of life sucks are experiencing??”
@@sweetlilhifi gotta sit with it.
classic Uwe, Postal was something really special
Christopher Plummer actually told Terrance Malick exactly what uwe boll said actors should tell TM after filming "the new world "
Is there video available? Or is it a print interview?
he lowkey not even wrong about terrence malick and i love terrence malick
Agree with this take so hard; PTA has fallen off a cliff and is living off reputation alone.
I think he still makes good movies especially Licorice Pizza.
He make terrible films but he does make some good points here
PTA crying in admiration that the genius behind Postal has seen his films.
Licorice Pizza & Inherent Vice maybe aren't at the top of my list for PTA films, sure, but good grief you've gotta be pretty aggressively oblivious to not catch all the profound majesty inherent throughout The Phantom Thread.
I haven’t seen Inherent Vice Or Phantom Thread, but I personally loved Licorice Pizza.
Imo, Inherent Vice is the best of PTA's last 3 films. Hopefully it will eventually be regarded as the brilliant work of art it is.
"Licorice Pizza" and "Inherent Vice" are hilarious. I think muppetos get confused when a movie's funny AND has good cinematography. ("Phantom Thread" is also very funny.)
@@maxtubbI recommend watching Phantom Thread asap. I thought I would hate it because of what it was about, but it’s one of my favorite movies
Yeah, the guy lost me when he started dissing Phantom Thread, which is one of the best character studies ever in addition to being absolutely gorgeous to look at.
Uwe Boll clearly knows the difference between a good and bad film. Kind of a tragedy he choose an easy productivity path.
Where can we watch the full podcast?? Link pls anyone?
Now i remember where this extract is from, is from the interview of "The Movies That Made Me", the podcast with Joe Dante as the main host.
PTAsisters, our response?
Uwe bull may be a tacky director at first for obvious reasons but postal and rampage are a good start, I wish uwe would make flims no one can make only he can think of the fact he loves pta makes me love the guy more.
He just finished shooting a new movie called First Shift, which is a crime movie set in New York.
Rampage and Postal were good, but also Assault on Wall Street, Darfur and Stoic are worth watching.
Rampage wasn't half bad atall, he was putting in effort there.
That!s really interesting. I appreciate his take. I think Malick’s movies are glorious, but I appreciate what Boll said about them
We need more edgelord film-makers like Uwe Boll in this world.
I think that it´s soooo rich that Uwe Boll of all people should give advice about movies that are exercises in nothing, and an excuse to blow up money down the drain...
If you're talking about his videogame movies then yes, but when Uwe actually cares about something (Rampage, Darfur), it definetly has more substance than "Song To Song", for example.
Agreed with Uwe
LMAO I love Terrence malick but I gotta admit dude has a point
This is a very interesting clip. Boll is a terrible filmmaker but I think he knows this… I will say nothing against the deities that are Anderson and Terrence Malick… But I can’t say that he’s completely wrong about the later Malick films. They are uniquely him. If people keep giving him money to do it, then I will keep watching
Malick's last film, The Hidden Life, was a return to form.
@@Jimmy1982Playlists agreed.
The director of drive-in turnips like Bloodrayne has the temerity to backhand a Terence Malik film? Go back to the kid's table.
I never thought I'd say this but...hard agree with Uwe Boll on everything said here
WOW.
Idk I like movies where two people smile at each other on the beach for 25 minutes but you do you :)
Agreed or disagree with, but I love his honesty, most directors would choose to be polite and political correct just to not burn bridges, but this guy knows his movies are so awful he doesn't need to play that game he knows he doesn't have a reputation to protect
I agree with Uwe.
I mean hes not wrong
He’s not completely wrong about some of Terrence Malick’s movies, nothing happens and they’re all style with little substance. However, Malick puts way more thought and effort in his films than Uwe does
I agree. There will be blood and The Master where phenomenal masterpieces and even though inherent vice, licorice pizza, phantom threat were good, they weren't as good as what came before the master and there will be blood. The likes of Boogie nights, Magnolia, Punch drunk love. Something as good as There will be blood, how do you top that?
Tarantino is very wise man to retire after his tenth movie. History won't look at him like he's a schmuck like this other directors.
LMAO it's Uwe Boll, and he's talking to who?
This is cringy but kind of funny lol. To have Uwe Boll say this about one of the greatest living filmmakers. I can see not entirely being on board with Inherent Vice as it’s clearly wilfully vague and oblique. But The Master and Phantom Thread are masterpieces. And Licorice Pizza is hilarious, and a damn good time.
Uwe is completely right, WTF happened to these 2 filmmakers? The same can be said for Spielberg and Ridley Scott.
Have you ever played a video game, and it is much much funner at the beginning when your Avatar is poor and weak? Then when you have maxed out and leveled up to the point where nothing is a challenge, the game isn't fun anymore.
Although I agree with everything he said to a tee (except I think Magnolia is worse than "ok"), the footage of "Tree Of Life" is NOT what he's talking about. He's talking about the three movies he made AFTER "Tree Of Life". He peaked with "Tree Of Life" and then kept going down that route, not unlike Lynch who sort of peaked with "Mullholland Drive" and then kept going down that route with "Inland Empire". Great audio though, thanks for sharing it, I couldn't agree more. I think he's a little hard on "Phantom Thread" and "Licorice Pizza", but they are nowhere near as great as "Boogie Nights" and "There Will Be Blood". Those are the two movies that he's going to go down in history for (plus any masterpiece he may direct in the future, which he's definitely capable of).
Agreed. Except for Magnolia. I guess I saw it when I was 12 or 13 and I was mesmerized
id say lynch did that kind of movie 3 times with lost highway
He actually peaked with A Hidden Life. The issue is that Uwe, much like many people, are conditioned to crave something separate from cinema. What they want is literature that is being visually captured. Cinema is about constructing specific images that end up conjuring feelings, many of which are undefinable. It's not about a story. It's about a narrative, yes, but not a story. Malick's experiments might not be satisfying but at least they're close to actual cinema.
Uwe Boll saying Malick makes crap movies. Right.
That’s interesting, because Uwe Boll is basically the inverse of PTA. House of the Dead is hilariously awful, and each film since then has been exponentially worse than the previous.
Disprove a single thing he says. You can’t.
This is absurd. Uwe is the same guy who complains endlessly about how Hollywood has been ruined by comic books, Disney and "George Clooney bullshit" but then you have two directors like Malick and PTA who are actually able to make unique and interesting films without pandering to man-babies and he has a problem with that too. Malick and PTA are on a different level. They've made their bones, they've produced timeless classics and assured their place in the history of American Cinema, so now they can just make movies for themselves and afford to be a bit self-indulgent. Uwe Boll will never reach that level of financial and artistic freedom so of course he doesn't get it.
There was a glimpse of Boll doing it once but he squandered it.
It's easy to make fun of Uwe Boll, as if his opinion isn't all that valid because his films are terrible. But hell, mine would be terrible too. At least he's got the balls to keep trying.
Uwe Boll has made some of the worst movies in cinematic history, a good 95% of them are unwachable, but he has standouts like Darfur and Rampage. Both of these films seem like they were made by a different director compared to the slop he usually serves up, I was shocked when I saw his directing credits on both these films. Having said that its hilarious that he is throwing shade at another director who has talent that far exeeds his 🤣
This guy has zero credibility he sucks as a filmmaker.
The GOATS