I thought this was supposed to be a scientific channel. You quoted studies that gathered their data from surveys on people opinions of traits, and then concluded that the opinions are therefore fact. Other than the study done on foot Oder by the Shiseido Research Center in Yokohama I don't believe I have ever been witness to a less scientific study. My little brother is doing a-level psychology and even he can tell the study is complete bogus (I'm sure anyone with half a brain also can). These studies you quoted don't even merit an "F" in a-level, if you call yourself a scientific channel please try to include more reliable and ecologically valid studies.
+XXxlightmarex Fuck yeah mate, exactly my thoughts. Sorry about the profanity. But I find it as ridiculous as you do, that this channel considers themselves scientific. By the looks of it these pseudo-journal scientists are spreading false info like crazy. The Intelligence trait was the most ridiculous. Guess it doesnt matter that men have made most of the inventions created.
+XXxlightmarex This isn't first pseudoscientific study they have posted in here. They keep dropping them every now and then, so that viewers who are scientific illiterate won't notice them. One more of this sort of bullshit and I will unsubscribe, without any doubt many did already.
Well they're a RUclips channel and they're trying to make videos often. They make a lot of videos clickbait so that people will watch. It'd be nice if they were a lot like Kurzgesagt.
They have videos like this for both click bait and feeble political/social engineering reasons like this before. Any blanket judgement on any group is simple stupidity in most cases. Replace male and female and change it to black and white and watch people get pissed off at the ignorance.
Camryn VB I’ve literally seen you in the comments section of another video about men and woman. Just stop surfing the web looking for someone to argue with. Get something to entertain yourself. Get a cat. Simple to take care of, and entertaining.
walk into a room and say, "women are better then men." everyone cheers. walk into a room and say, "Men are better then women." everyone thinks your a bigot and chases you out of the room.
Yeah because women have faced oppression for years because of men. Women are still treated like they are nothing by men. So yeah, people would rather hear the first saying.
If someone stands against the former he is the one treated as a bigot and in the latter case she, well every woman will stand against it I bet and they will demand for the former statement to be said by putting up their “feminist equality “ nonsense
The only important thing when electing public officials is policy. Nothing else. Gender is arbitrary. This is one of the most sexist videos I've seen on youtube.
It's not opinion. It's science. They are just saying that, from looking at the statistics, that women are just more likely to show the qualities of a good leader.
To be fair, it is surpising that nothing bad happen during Obama presidency. I agree that not much has been done but at least it is better than making things worse.
+Dori C No you have to vote you ignorant fuck! Black president Female president Gay president Transgender president and so on, we have to go trough them all
agreed. judge someone by their character.. what they stand for. there are both men and women capable of being leaders and there are men and women who aren't.
Wow, this one seriously has me considering unsubscribing. You know what makes a better leader? The person with the better skills. Gender doesn't even fucking enter into it.
@@billybelly9583 Sorry for my language, but a study based on opinions only is a complete bullshit that shouldn't have been published. Stop writing nonsense , please.
HERE'S SOME MATH, DNEWS. This is nothing but a game of numbers. You're basically trying to compare a set of 95 men to a set of 5 women, and coming to the conclusion that women are better leaders because 4 of them are good (80%) and 60 of the men are good (only 63%). It only demonstrates that a larger % of woman leaders happen to be "good leaders". That's because women are generally NOT geared toward leadership, and the ones who are geared toward leadership are more likely to excel at it and stand out. In other words, the conclusion of these studies is completely invalid since the sample sizes are so VASTLY different. Math and logic must be sexist though.
Finally someone understands mathematics, percentages depend on the number of people taking part It’s basically like 100 guys to 10 girls and percentage based on how many of them have succeeded. Even if 8 of them are successful it makes about 8% women to be successful not the other way round though
Just to be clear. The participants of this survey were asked loaded questions to achieve a gender specific answer: "Who do you think are more honest, Men or Women?" Pew socials whole study is anecdotal based on the opinions / beliefs of the survey participants. All it shows is the current social norm where women are currently favored far higher than men by public opinion. This is troubling.
this is really ridiculous and sad. when sexism is against women, it's unfair. when it's against men, apparently it's seen as fair. Sexism against anyone is awful. Nice Hillary ad, Dnews.
+Julianna Reader Oh, we're past that already. No doubt, we've all heard someone spew out the ironically sexist exemption that "women can't be sexist" by citing a skewed definition of sexism. It's even made an impact on reputable dictionaries. Most of them tacked on that vague "especially against women" after the original "prejudice by sex" definition. The whole process will happen to the definition of racism any day now.
It doesn't matter who we are, what matters is our plan. Ugh exactly. I'm an interracial and bisexual girl and I recognize that everyone can be discriminated against based on sexuality, race, and gender regardless of whether they're a minority.
Excellent question. Then everyone would be telling women to get over it in the comments instead of defending- why they aren't sexist but men are better and women are just hurt by the truth. The reality of the content of the video is that it's pretty evenly matched between sexes and it really comes down to personal traits, but no one saw that part because of the abysmal titling of this video. They definitely shouldn't have worded it that way imo.
Yes Women Are Rated Better Than Men on Key Leadership Capabilities According to an analysis of thousands of 360-degree reviews, women outscored men on 17 of the 19 capabilities that differentiate excellent leaders from average or poor ones. Capability Women’s percentile Men’s percentile Takes initiative 55.6 48.2 Resilience 54.7 49.3 Practices self-development 54.8 49.6 Drives for results 53.9 48.8 Displays high integrity and honesty 54.0 49.1 Develops others 54.1 49.8 Inspires and motivates others 53.9 49.7 Bold leadership 53.2 49.8 Builds relationships 53.2 49.9 Champions change 53.1 49.8 Establishes stretch goals 52.6 49.7 Collaboration and teamwork 52.6 50.2 Connects to the outside world 51.6 50.3 Communicates powerfully and prolifically 51.8 50.7 Solves problems and analyzes issues 51.5 50.4 Leadership speed 51.5 50.5 Innovates 51.4 51 Technical or professional expertise 50.1 51.1 Develops strategic perspective 50.1 51.4 Note: The t-values of all data are statistically significant. hbr.org/2019/06/research-women-score-higher-than-men-in-most-leadership-skills Highest well being www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2020/09/11/top-countries-in-the-world-on-wellbeing-spot-the-women-yet-again/
+Pranol Mathew Maybe because you're in the mindset of the presidential race? As a non-american this video is completely fine and to me doesn't have a hint of Hilary promotion whatsoever. If you loose respect over a simple video like this and calling is propaganda, maybe it's you who has a problem.
+Pranol Mathew Nothing in this video even remotely hints at being supportive of Hitlery. If you can't accept these (suggestive and inconclusive) studies for what they are, then that's too bad for you man...
Here, I fixed it for you. Men and women are honest. Men work themselves to the bone more. Both are smart. Men are clearly more ambitious. Women clearly more outgoing. Men are decisive, but women aren't. Both are creative in different ways. And both are compassionate.
Maybe, but until society can transcend human nature and our tendency to not hold women accountable, they will make for poor leaders because the unaccountable are tyrants.
one more part. after allowing women in leadership roles within the military it was found that women did not do well under pressure, not one bit. Woman performed well in pre-battle preparations but when the pressure built up they buckled. They buckled so hard that the military is considering removing women from high stress leadership roles. They also found that men were more aggressive which is an extension of ambitious. I'm not going to look up for details but it was very recently so it should not be hard to find
@@umhi6197 so you don't agree?! Women even know how women are that's why they rather work with men. I'm not bashing women emotion is a good trait not just for every decision women make
Men work harder, men can stay rational during stressful situations, less prone to emotionalism(temper tantrums), and is more willing to sacrifice their own self-interest for that of the team.
+relo999 I want the freedom for my children to achieve as much education as possible without the self distructive nature of debt caused by the current for-profit student loan schemes that plague our youth. I want my children to be able to not be afraid of being too poor to see a doctor, or the massive debt that it can cause. I want my children to have the best lives possible, to be successful humans who also inturn seek to improve the human experience, and have the education, wages and good health to live healthier and happier then my generation. I want their kids to grow up happy and confident in a stable home. Poverty, lack of healthcare and inaccessibility to higher education all cause less effective parenting and less effective childen who grow into adults who fail. I don't want to have the next generation be failures. Anyone who would forsake the future for merits of the now is selfish.
I've never once looked at women as inferior in any way. That being said, i've been hearing how women are better than men for quite a while now. I choose my politicians like I deal with used car salesmen; The harder you try and sell it, the more and more skeptical I become. You're making it even harder for me to trust Hillary with videos like this Dnews...
I've exclusively had female managers. Soon I'm starting a new job under a male manager. I'm genuinely curious about what he's like. I can't say I was ever satisfied with my female managers. To be fair, I was working in some rather toxic workplaces, and one of my main complaints was that my female managers held age and gender stereotypes, which is obviously not an intrinsic problem with women, but an issue of socialisation. I want women to succeed, I just don't want to feel like crap when I'm at work.
Since forever. we are not the ones starting wars because of our bruised egos. lmao. Men emotionally stable? Nope. Men's emotions have been the bane of our existence. Many men have been putting down women's emotions for millennia. Making us seem crazy by having emotions. Men's emotions are seen as rational. Women's are seen as irrational. Why is a woman irrational when she is angry? Why is a man justified in his anger? Unfortunately this emotional control affects both men and women.
Okay so I just read all those comments and all I can say is wow. I'm a guy and I've had some very calm cool and collected bosses that were female. My bosses made amazing choices for the companies and I was always able to work out the problems with them. Sure you all think hormonal changes affect them, and they do, I LIVE in a house of girls and although they complain at home, in public they are fine even though I know they're dying inside. You all need to look at reality, no one is a better leader weather it be male or female. Women have trouble with emotions and decisiveness and men have trouble with compassionate actions and feelings as well as creativity in a problem. We all have our ups and downs so I really don't understand why you all must think lower of one gender or the other. This video was based on opinions of people in surveys which I do agree can make the result a bit untrustworthy. Although these opinions of the people do have an impact. The stereotypes that hold women back from leader roles are enforced by many people not just men but women too. Therefore eventually if a woman lives in that environment for a while she believes in those stereotypes even if they are taken away. This causes her to abide by them forcing herself to conform to them because she wants to be what society wants her to be. Also, isn't it the same with guys? we are told to hide our emotions, not to cry. We are told we should be muscular, cool and collected. My final point is intelligence, some of you believe women are less intelligent than men. Although it may be true for some women you meet most women are extremely intelligent. I've met women who could solve very complex math problems in under a minute and come up with fantastic ideas to improve lives. Yet they are too afraid to step up because of an imaginary barrier from years of being told they aren't supposed to be that smart or do that certain thing as, I said earlier. Just know I am a man coming up to say this because most men think they are too high and mighty to just admit we are all equal and any woman can be a leader if she works for it, same for men. The only barrier that keeps anyone from being a leader is the hard work it takes. No matter who you are, gender, race, religion, you can always try.
(THIS IS A STUPID LONG WALL OF TEXT. ALSO THIS IS JUST ME THROWING MY TWO CENTS IN SO DON'T EXPECT ME TO BE COMPLETELY RIGHT EITHER. THIS IS A MERE SOCIAL THEORY.) That's pretty much all it bubbles down to...Both genders have their advantages and disadvantages. Which is why we as a human race HAVE to work hard for it in the first place and why we respect the hard workers. I've never really gotten a serious job or anything with a female leader (or a male leader). But this is the impression I am beginning to get with all the "Male Vs. Female" arguments. Personally I don't really like the video (and I'm saying it as a woman). Mostly because it kinda feels like they are favoring females a bit more than they should. I mean, look at all the traits women have in comparison to the other three that men were given. Seriously? Even I know that is not even close to true. I believe that women can be good leaders, but since (and I KNOW for a fact I will be called out for saying I'm some SJW feminist, even though I'm against third wave feminism and the basic SJW mindset) society kinda had no choice but to make women the nurturers and men the leaders, because of that women ended up not really given the chance too often. *I AM NOT SAYING THERE WAS A PATRIARCHY OF ANY KIND.* The only time I thought society was a bit sexist was when women weren't allowed to vote and got less pay when compared to a man at the same job they are given. And both those issues are long gone. We as a human race had no choice but to make men the leaders/bread winners and women the more affectionate/nurturers during the past. We didn't have the technology or the scientific knowledge we now hold. It was our only way to survive, since that was a more biological role that we were accustomed to have. Of course there will always be stereotypes, but really? Who gives a damn at this point? It's human nature for people to be rebellious at one point or another. So that really shouldn't be accustomed as a real crutch as it may have once been. Not to mention we have more scientific knowledge than ever, with this knowledge we can actually push back the original ideas of genders and their original intentions and actually try to improve on both genders and the human race as a whole. There is no need to put either gender down anymore. Misogyny and Misandry are both very poisonous mindsets and should be frowned upon. Women will learn to catch up, hell they almost succeeded (In the worst way possible imo but we are starting to learn) eventually there will be women who will just as great of leaders as the presidents we once had, it may just take longer due to the sacrifices we had to make in the past unfortunately. But going back to what you said, you are right. It all bubbles down to hard work. We as women can either take our sweet ass time and blame others for our failures (#1 reason why I'm against third wave feminism and the SJW mindset). Or, we can actually work to meet up with the success that men have made, because all in all, to deny the success that men have made in the past is just plain ignorant. I truly do believe there are women who actually wanna help the world, the inventors and GOOD political models (not women like Hillary, she's a disgrace) are proof of that. Don't let the past get to you. Do what needs to be done. Even if it means playing catch up. You know what they say: Better late than never.
this scientific research seem to base on people preconceived notions and social view of women. It was very opinion oriented the only part at the end about bringing more money back to their state seems to imply that fund raising is the only prerequisite needed to be considered a good leader. I subscribe for science not opinion based studies.
Did you just say that the study asked what people THOUGHT were the prevalent traits of each gender? Because if you base your study on that, you are essentially gathering information on people's stereotypes, not actual leadership qualities. And if you present it as a valid study like you're doing in this video, you are saying that stereotyping is good. Let's take a look at the list of traits you ascribe to women: *Honest* - If you think women are more honest, I'd suggest you look at Hillary and compare her to Sanders. Then I want you to tell me with a straight face that she's more honest. *Intelligent* - You must have missed all the studies measuring intelligence among adults, because almost all of them show a 2-5 IQ point advantage in favor of men. *Hardworking* - Men work on average longer hours, are willing to do harder and more dangerous jobs and retire later, so the claim that women are equally or more hardworking is a blatant lie. *Ambitious* - Look at the number of entrepreneurs and their goals. Or look at how many fortune 500 companies were founded by women. *Outgoing* - If that were the case, we would see way more actually funny female comedians. *Creative* - You should take a look at the people who get successful in arts and literature. Can you name even one successful female Hollywood director without googling it? *Compassionate* - You should look at the feminist movement with their "Male Tears" cups or the hashtag #KillAllMen, especially when male genital mutilation, suicide and homelessness is discussed. Or Hillary's "women are the primary victims of war" bullshit. Or how much compassion they show when they are confronted with the fact that men have literally NO reproductive rights. Women's compassion is an act, while men have been supporting women and children from the dawn of time, with blood, sweat and tears. And if it's not enough, compare the rates of violence between gay and lesbian couples. And then the amount of violence against children done by single mothers vs single fathers. Women's compassion is the biggest lie in history. So please stop spreading your bullshit propaganda. It's disgusting.
Incidentally I'm reading a book about history of my country. From prehistoric times to present. We used to have grand dukes. They would control the land, they would be leaders of that land. Leading was not the only thing they had to do, they would have to go to war against neighbours. Know how to fight , yield swords, ride horses, and kill people to protect their families, this responsibility would give them the power to control over their lands. What army of women would stand proud and win against an equal number of army of men? None, and because women could not have done it ever in their lives that is why they never were leaders. Only now when most jobs can be made by women, be it statistically not as good as males, they still manage to get into leadership positions, due to watever reasons. But they are not buildt for that, exceptions of course exist, but just because there are albino ravens you cant say that ravens are white.
I think as men we should all caress our women on the cheek, give them a forehead kiss, assure them they're beautiful, and simply say "Yes baby girl, yes your a better leader than me okay sweetie". Come on fellas, it's not like we don't already pretend a lot of none sense is true just to keep their feelings from getting hurt. Like we don't already bend over backwards making sure she feels "important". I for one think the girl in the video and her cute zeal for her fellow women is just so adorable that I can't help but to just agree with her. It's not like I don't already literally tend to the emotions of my mother, sisters, female friends, and girlfriend as if I am handling a bomb. Like they don't explode in emotions and demand for me to be a man when I don't handle their heart as if it was made of glass. This is nothing new ladies we got you. Yes your better leaders, okay? But back to reality, when women begin in everyday life to lead me emotionally and physically like I do them, then I'll be open to them being better leaders.. Which lets be honest fellas, WE CAN ONLY WISH. Till then sweetie, be satisfied with us pretending that we are equals in mental stability, emotionally, and physically. FYI a lot of men now a days are pathetic excuses for men, and there definitely is plenty of women who do lead better. But that's individual verses individual, gender verses gender, you know. Now I'm going to re-watch this lady's adorable zeal. Fiery little eyes.
I don't know, have you heard of the "women are wonderful" effect? Since those are asking people what they think of their leaders not how they score in tests. This results are pretty consistent with the "women are wonderful effect" something you could talk about next video, if you have any degree of honesty, of course.
It doesn't seem that the people disliking and complaining in the comment fully watched the video. Get over your emotions people and stop being so easily triggered. 02:07 "both men and women would be EQUALLY GOOD at leadership" 03:23 "most people said men and women had EQUAL PROWESSES at leadership"
+FrozenEternity Probably has something to do with Lisette brazenly declaring that "Well, women DO make better leaders." right at the start of the video.
+FrozenEternity Yes, but you cannot deny that the opening statements of any video of this kind usually set it's tone. By making this declaration, even if it's not what she actually believes, a lot of people will think that it's her opinion and that she's rather biased.
Kitten Communism I agree that your reason is likely exactly what set them all to instantly dislike and go ranting in the comments. But it really is a sad state of things then these people that are watching a channel about research and science don't choose to listen to the full argument. People are just letting their own bias getting in the way of logic and reason
Agreed. I think that a lot of people are tired of hearing about gender issues and are getting more and more intolerant when the subject keeps being brought up. Speaking from my perspective, I used to be a rather convinced feminist myself. But a lot of people abused the concept in the past few years and turned a lot of inconsequential things into dramatic gendered issues. "Manspreading" and the likes. The constant outcry we keep hearing about turns a lot of people off.
men: -building a city -fighting crimes -pave the road -generating electricity -farming food for countless people -protecting your liberty by going to war -plumbing a community sewer and -other countless things keep society functioning seeker with their bias facts: aRe woMEn BETter LeAdeR?
The gender of a person is not what makes a good leader. What makes a good leader is a person's values, ethics and norms, how they act. Not what sex they are. This study does not say that women are better leaders than men, but rather maybe there are more women suitable for a leaderjob than there are men suitable for a leaderjob. Although, it sounds like complete and utter bullshit :P
And did I just read a Kamala Harris Cope line? Women will never be great leaders. Stop coping you have a monthly cycle which makes you go crazy and hormonal and balanced and have the luxury of testosterone at 10 times the levels of women which creates stability, security, performance and ability to work mad hours and take action when needed. Women do not have character traits, other than stupid beta feminist articles like this that invent their own list of characteristics for leadership.
Lol, don't make me laugh. Let's take a look at the shittiest leaders *Donald Trump *Jair Bolsonaro *Ron DeSantis *Rick Scott *Brian Kemp *Rick Snyder *Greg Abbott *Mike Pence
Very convenient to not include two more things that men typically are better at. Independent thinking(less susceptible to social pressures), and projecting authority(no that's not just a cultural thing. Hormones play in on both of these) And yes, all this is on average, and differences a small to moderate on all these metrics
Logically speaking, wouldn't both genders be equally good at leading? Gender wouldn't really affect this, it would be the traits of the specific person.
What logic are you talking about? Lol leadership is not by emotion and you have to be strong minded and women are naturally emotional people and weak minded compared to men so no this is not logical
+Jonathan Castgate A "science channel" should be impartial. It's not difficult to see what they were doing, and most people don't enjoy being manipulated.
Considering around 75% of ALL employees, male and female, prefer a male boss I think that is all that needs to be said. Women typically hate female bosses, and if you disagree, you disagree with facts. Sorry if that hurts your "feelings".
Women may be emotionally unstable but they’ll make better leaders than men! The future is under the rule of women! They say it all the time so it must be true! Facts are feelings anyways.
The feminist agenda is strong with this one... maybe you and those studies are right and women have better capabilities to be leaders, but at the end of the day what matters is reality; there is nothing stopping women to choose a career in politics, there are even affirmative actions to promote women in politics, but the majority still not interested... ... and then those same women (angry feminists) are the ones complaining about not being represented by their leaders [because a "white man" who dedicated his life to reach a position of power should be ashame of himself for being hardworking, ambitious and decisive]
But of course, the most important leadership quality is "desire to lead". Any individual who aces all the rest but chooses not to lead automatically becomes an inferior leader to the mediocre person who actually steps up to the plate. A mediocre leader who actually leads is going to get a lot more accomplished than the brilliant leader who never steps up.
There has been great male leaders, and there has been great female leaders in history. No one gender is better than the other. This is like arguing that an apple is better than an orange because the apple is red.
Interesting but leadership is more of an individual's choice and feminine roles you showed are generalizations about genders. So even if women are better at leadership roles that doesn't mean all women will be good leaders. Everyone is capable of being good at leadership but being a leader is something you work at not inherit.
People are saying "they should be equal" when they clearly did not listen to the whole video, because it clearly said that men and women would make equally good leaders. Also, everyone is upset because Hilary doesn't fit into some of these traits. Well duh, assuming that everyone in a group has the same traits is called stereotyping. Hilary does not represent all women, just like this study does not say that all women leaders have these traits. People only hear what they want to...
Then what is the point of this video if both genders are equally capable. This is like me making a video saying water is wet. Theirs absolutely no point whatsoever.
Daniel Boyas As they said in the video, there are a lot of people who say that a man would make a better leader when these studies would show otherwise. If everyone accepted that men and women were equal, then there would be no point to this video, but not everyone thinks like that. The point was to show those people, with science, that some women would make good leaders.
Better video: Do sociopaths make better leaders than non-sociopaths? That's a much more interesting topic and you won't seem as sexist as the video like/dislike bar demonstrates.
Before watching the video, I'm just gonna guess based on the bias I've seen from this channel in the past, that the answer is "yes". Edit: 0:05 Wow, wasn't expecting that my half-joking cynicism would be proven correct *that* quickly.
Men *(in general)* : are better at sports cause they are stronger, pain handling, etc. Women *(in general)* : are better at noticing colour which can help with cooking and better at communicating which can help with teaching
Oh cmon leadership needs a fuckload of emotional stability, ive had female bosses , its a disaster, you cant make rational decisions if your emotions are all over the place doesn't matter how good you are in anything else.women are good in alot of stuff just not as leaders
+Professor Retr0 you obviously dont watch enough of their videos to talk about that something a while back that murica aint a true democracy even founding leaders said so because something about a large crowd cannot be effective also because they have a single leader + congress, and they have the power not the civilians, BUt you might argue that the people vote them in, Yes, but they have the power unless in the president, more then half the states dont legally have to vote for your chosen in electoral college, and a few videos back about donald trump and republican democrazy, how ted won with 0 votes its not an easy debate, too many factors and gray areas to say they are a democracy(in full)
I'm a bernie supporter. Now that that's out of the way I'd like to ask why everyone is hating on this video? I think their message regarding the american election wasn't "you should vote for Hilary" rather "don't not vote for Hillary because she's a women".
yeah I'm on the same page as you, I want to view this from a scientific stance. I hate Trump cus he's possible tyrant and Hillary is corrupt and pretentious so I wouldn't touch her if I could vote which sadly I can't yet
Rupe Dodkins yeah I think I can post things hopefully people who are able to vote seize this opportunity to have a president who actually wants to legitly progress our country towards a better future :^)
If there are studies that say women aren't as decisive as men, i can see that would just add to stress, or make that constant feeling of you wanting to change your mind afterwards. Then arises the chance for compromise. That comes from compassion. A wedge for vulnerability in a decision based job.
+Robert Faust No they aren't on average. I'm not saying men are better leaders automatically, but they are on average. Quit this liberal fucking nonsense.
It is wrong to use generalization of gender when considering leaders, leaders are in the spotlight. their actions and opinions are judge by their people. leaders are a select few who should be elected by merit, popularity and policy stances. one gender/race should irrelevant.
I thought this was supposed to be a scientific channel.
You quoted studies that gathered their data from surveys on people opinions of traits, and then concluded that the opinions are therefore fact.
Other than the study done on foot Oder by the Shiseido Research Center in Yokohama I don't believe I have ever been witness to a less scientific study.
My little brother is doing a-level psychology and even he can tell the study is complete bogus (I'm sure anyone with half a brain also can).
These studies you quoted don't even merit an "F" in a-level, if you call yourself a scientific channel please try to include more reliable and ecologically valid studies.
+XXxlightmarex Thank you! I was expecting there to be some sort of catch to this, seeing as it's DNews.
+XXxlightmarex Fuck yeah mate, exactly my thoughts.
Sorry about the profanity.
But I find it as ridiculous as you do, that this channel considers themselves scientific.
By the looks of it these pseudo-journal scientists are spreading false info like crazy.
The Intelligence trait was the most ridiculous. Guess it doesnt matter that men have made most of the inventions created.
+XXxlightmarex This isn't first pseudoscientific study they have posted in here. They keep dropping them every now and then, so that viewers who are scientific illiterate won't notice them. One more of this sort of bullshit and I will unsubscribe, without any doubt many did already.
Well they're a RUclips channel and they're trying to make videos often. They make a lot of videos clickbait so that people will watch. It'd be nice if they were a lot like Kurzgesagt.
They have videos like this for both click bait and feeble political/social engineering reasons like this before. Any blanket judgement on any group is simple stupidity in most cases. Replace male and female and change it to black and white and watch people get pissed off at the ignorance.
Short answer: No
Long answer: Nooooooooooo
Alpha 01 Not true. at least we know how to get along, unlike you.
Yin Yang Seen it.
Alpha 01 you are soo wrong
Simple answer: nope
Camryn VB I’ve literally seen you in the comments section of another video about men and woman. Just stop surfing the web looking for someone to argue with. Get something to entertain yourself. Get a cat. Simple to take care of, and entertaining.
since when do women have a high fucking level of emotional stability?
right?
since we don't start wars over trival things. always.
+Kayla Elizabeth No. To your credit, you tend to select targets that don't strike back.
savage
+Trenchcoat1Sword is that not a more clever way?
"Yeah most people said they make equal leaders so that means women are better"
alright
WorcestershireySauce at one point in time most people said the earth was flat.
@@kingkoua1 yea but people were not advanced as today
@@kingkoua1 if you meant in the middle ages then you are wrong historically it was a lie they knew it was a ball shaped(i have bad English)
@@God_Is_Bulgarian Actually, it is even older than that : we know that Earth isn't flat since 4th century BC at least.
@@derp-7274so advanced we can’t figure out how the ancients did most of what they did 😂
walk into a room and say, "women are better then men." everyone cheers. walk into a room and say, "Men are better then women." everyone thinks your a bigot and chases you out of the room.
TRUE
Yeah exactly dude ! This world is going crazy I think.
Yeah because women have faced oppression for years because of men. Women are still treated like they are nothing by men. So yeah, people would rather hear the first saying.
Who's chearing for this?
If someone stands against the former he is the one treated as a bigot and in the latter case she, well every woman will stand against it I bet and they will demand for the former statement to be said by putting up their “feminist equality “ nonsense
most Brazilians would disagree haha
I'm with you, fellow hue.
Lmfao so true!
lol
+VLVL37 kkkkk. entre uma comunista e um fascista. fico com a comunista man....
+Eduardo Rezende just because a leader is bad doesn't mean it has to do with their gender. There are far more bad male leaders than bad women leaders.
The only important thing when electing public officials is policy. Nothing else. Gender is arbitrary.
This is one of the most sexist videos I've seen on youtube.
yup
+Wille _ Yes agreed.
+Wille _ Agreed as well.
Agreed.
It's not opinion. It's science. They are just saying that, from looking at the statistics, that women are just more likely to show the qualities of a good leader.
Reporting this for being hateful content against a specific gender.
Kay.
+MaxisweTV It was not hateful XD. Its hilarious how everyone is getting the wrong end of the stick XD
+Justice Wild fat
+Bridget Benitez exactly u cant be hateful against men like srsly
Lol. Of course you could be hateful. I can't tell if you are baiting or overreacting but either way you should stop.
It's not about gender, it's about personality.
+Kevin Yeoh
and certain genders have personality traits that occur more often.
Your point?
The Walking Cake
Pay attention you moron
The Walking Cake im not pissed off lol good job wasting your time
Kevin Yeoh Yes 👏👏👏👏👏 finally someone who understands 👏👏👏
Alice J u should be ashamed of urself for reaall.. I meaaann whoooo ur parents did a good job
Cool Hilary Ad. Unsubscribed!
+Gaben v
Same lol
+Gaben Lord Gaben, you should be president!
agree
Unsubscribe bitches!
great female leaders like Angela Merkel? lol no
+Alex Hutcherson merkel =rape
+Alex Hutcherson Yes like Merkel like Thatcher like Sonia Gandhi like Benazir Bhutto and dozens of others
merkel has played well in finacial crisis and the organisational crisis with refugees.
you wouldnt do this better my friend and a man also not.
+Mr. Gold if you think the refugee crisis is going will for Germany you're a fool.
She is trying to make Germany again a Naazi state but this time jihadi- Nazzis yaa
*Don't vote for someone simply based on their gender*
To be fair, it is surpising that nothing bad happen during Obama presidency. I agree that not much has been done but at least it is better than making things worse.
+Dori C No you have to vote you ignorant fuck!
Black president
Female president
Gay president
Transgender president
and so on, we have to go trough them all
agreed. judge someone by their character.. what they stand for. there are both men and women capable of being leaders and there are men and women who aren't.
I'm unscubscribing. In less than a month, DNews has gone down time drain.
Carl Grimes's Eyepatch oh no males safe space!
Bye 😢
Wow, this one seriously has me considering unsubscribing.
You know what makes a better leader? The person with the better skills. Gender doesn't even fucking enter into it.
it does
They literally just explained, it isn't about the gender it's just science that proved women are better (by some things) why r u offended lmao.
@@billybelly9583 bro read it again their bull
@@1otenwithonotzero223 bull what
@@billybelly9583 Sorry for my language, but a study based on opinions only is a complete bullshit that shouldn't have been published. Stop writing nonsense , please.
The very concept of deciding who is better based on gender is sexism by itself.
but if its put on a scientific study then no it isnt
@@billybelly9583 scientific studies are bogus and sexists themselves.
HERE'S SOME MATH, DNEWS. This is nothing but a game of numbers.
You're basically trying to compare a set of 95 men to a set of 5 women, and coming to the conclusion that women are better leaders because 4 of them are good (80%) and 60 of the men are good (only 63%). It only demonstrates that a larger % of woman leaders happen to be "good leaders". That's because women are generally NOT geared toward leadership, and the ones who are geared toward leadership are more likely to excel at it and stand out. In other words, the conclusion of these studies is completely invalid since the sample sizes are so VASTLY different. Math and logic must be sexist though.
DNews just got roasted
Finally someone understands mathematics, percentages depend on the number of people taking part It’s basically like 100 guys to 10 girls and percentage based on how many of them have succeeded. Even if 8 of them are successful it makes about 8% women to be successful not the other way round though
Just to be clear. The participants of this survey were asked loaded questions to achieve a gender specific answer:
"Who do you think are more honest, Men or Women?"
Pew socials whole study is anecdotal based on the opinions / beliefs of the survey participants. All it shows is the current social norm where women are currently favored far higher than men by public opinion. This is troubling.
Exactly
There's only one thing I learned from this video - Vote Trump.
Trump 2020
YEA LETS DEPORT THE MEXICANS
he’s doing such an amazing job (I’m TOTALLY not being sarcastic)
this is really ridiculous and sad. when sexism is against women, it's unfair. when it's against men, apparently it's seen as fair. Sexism against anyone is awful. Nice Hillary ad, Dnews.
+Julianna Reader
Oh, we're past that already. No doubt, we've all heard someone spew out the ironically sexist exemption that "women can't be sexist" by citing a skewed definition of sexism. It's even made an impact on reputable dictionaries. Most of them tacked on that vague "especially against women" after the original "prejudice by sex" definition. The whole process will happen to the definition of racism any day now.
It doesn't matter who we are, what matters is our plan. Ugh exactly. I'm an interracial and bisexual girl and I recognize that everyone can be discriminated against based on sexuality, race, and gender regardless of whether they're a minority.
Lol. I still vote Bernie.
Nice =)
+Natasha Wilson thats fine, the video has nothing to do with the debates.
yaaaaas
#feeltheburn 😊
+ALenezi Fahad #feelthebern
1:20 The people were asked *who they thought* was better in those categories.
That from the very beginning was an epic fail!!!
Just one question.. How would everyone react if the title said "do men make better leaders than women" instead?
Excellent question. Then everyone would be telling women to get over it in the comments instead of defending- why they aren't sexist but men are better and women are just hurt by the truth. The reality of the content of the video is that it's pretty evenly matched between sexes and it really comes down to personal traits, but no one saw that part because of the abysmal titling of this video. They definitely shouldn't have worded it that way imo.
Emotionally stable.... yeah right.
0cclusion Specialist it’s true. Just like the fact that boys have terrible literacy skills.
Yes Women Are Rated Better Than Men on Key Leadership Capabilities
According to an analysis of thousands of 360-degree reviews, women outscored men on 17 of the 19 capabilities that differentiate excellent leaders from average or poor ones.
Capability Women’s percentile Men’s percentile
Takes initiative 55.6 48.2
Resilience 54.7 49.3
Practices self-development 54.8 49.6
Drives for results 53.9 48.8
Displays high integrity and honesty 54.0 49.1
Develops others 54.1 49.8
Inspires and motivates others 53.9 49.7
Bold leadership 53.2 49.8
Builds relationships 53.2 49.9
Champions change 53.1 49.8
Establishes stretch goals 52.6 49.7
Collaboration and teamwork 52.6 50.2
Connects to the outside world 51.6 50.3
Communicates powerfully and prolifically 51.8 50.7
Solves problems and analyzes issues 51.5 50.4
Leadership speed 51.5 50.5
Innovates 51.4 51
Technical or professional expertise 50.1 51.1
Develops strategic perspective 50.1 51.4
Note: The t-values of all data are statistically significant.
hbr.org/2019/06/research-women-score-higher-than-men-in-most-leadership-skills
Highest well being
www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2020/09/11/top-countries-in-the-world-on-wellbeing-spot-the-women-yet-again/
Propaganda. Endorsing Hilary. Lost the little respect i had for Dnews.
agree
+Pranol Mathew Maybe because you're in the mindset of the presidential race? As a non-american this video is completely fine and to me doesn't have a hint of Hilary promotion whatsoever. If you loose respect over a simple video like this and calling is propaganda, maybe it's you who has a problem.
+Pranol Mathew Nothing in this video even remotely hints at being supportive of Hitlery. If you can't accept these (suggestive and inconclusive) studies for what they are, then that's too bad for you man...
before I even clicked on the video , I just knew the like dislike ratio would be crazy
Here, I fixed it for you. Men and women are honest. Men work themselves to the bone more. Both are smart. Men are clearly more ambitious. Women clearly more outgoing. Men are decisive, but women aren't. Both are creative in different ways. And both are compassionate.
Maybe, but until society can transcend human nature and our tendency to not hold women accountable, they will make for poor leaders because the unaccountable are tyrants.
one more part. after allowing women in leadership roles within the military it was found that women did not do well under pressure, not one bit. Woman performed well in pre-battle preparations but when the pressure built up they buckled. They buckled so hard that the military is considering removing women from high stress leadership roles. They also found that men were more aggressive which is an extension of ambitious. I'm not going to look up for details but it was very recently so it should not be hard to find
Jammet Leopard women out going ? Have you met a girl before (that is the majority I'm talking about please don't fucking kill me)
Aloe The Cactus I guess about half of the people I meet are girls, so .. yeah.
Jammet Leopard I don't agree on ambitious. Rest is okay.
The first trait is emotionaly stable, that cancels out 99.9% of women
Get a life
@@umhi6197 so you don't agree?! Women even know how women are that's why they rather work with men. I'm not bashing women emotion is a good trait not just for every decision women make
I'm I the only one who doesn't care about gender? I just want a good leader...
Men work harder, men can stay rational during stressful situations, less prone to emotionalism(temper tantrums), and is more willing to sacrifice their own self-interest for that of the team.
Still voting for Bernie.
+relo999 I want the freedom for my children to achieve as much education as possible without the self distructive nature of debt caused by the current for-profit student loan schemes that plague our youth. I want my children to be able to not be afraid of being too poor to see a doctor, or the massive debt that it can cause. I want my children to have the best lives possible, to be successful humans who also inturn seek to improve the human experience, and have the education, wages and good health to live healthier and happier then my generation. I want their kids to grow up happy and confident in a stable home. Poverty, lack of healthcare and inaccessibility to higher education all cause less effective parenting and less effective childen who grow into adults who fail. I don't want to have the next generation be failures. Anyone who would forsake the future for merits of the now is selfish.
I've never once looked at women as inferior in any way. That being said, i've been hearing how women are better than men for quite a while now. I choose my politicians like I deal with used car salesmen; The harder you try and sell it, the more and more skeptical I become. You're making it even harder for me to trust Hillary with videos like this Dnews...
That's because you are feminine.
While I love Dnews, there wasn't a whole lot of "science" but more so opinions in surveys.
I've exclusively had female managers.
Soon I'm starting a new job under a male manager.
I'm genuinely curious about what he's like.
I can't say I was ever satisfied with my female managers.
To be fair, I was working in some rather toxic workplaces,
and one of my main complaints was that my female managers held age and gender stereotypes,
which is obviously not an intrinsic problem with women, but an issue of socialisation.
I want women to succeed, I just don't want to feel like crap when I'm at work.
Women are emotionally stable? Ahahahaha since when? :D
Since forever. we are not the ones starting wars because of our bruised egos. lmao. Men emotionally stable? Nope. Men's emotions have been the bane of our existence. Many men have been putting down women's emotions for millennia. Making us seem crazy by having emotions. Men's emotions are seen as rational. Women's are seen as irrational. Why is a woman irrational when she is angry? Why is a man justified in his anger? Unfortunately this emotional control affects both men and women.
SamuelloXXL www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/study-women-are-better-leaders-2014-1
@@violettippet5246 90% of woman leaders I know get in conflicts daily, can't say the same about man.
@@-PureRogue Excuse me, Donald Trump is a VERY good example.
@@camrynvb5803 🤔 He didn't get into or instigate any war though
I'm down for having alot more women to take lead, but no down for Hilary
+Irving Guevara same, i dont care what sex is in charge of something, but that person better be the best option
Regardless of gender anyone who puts emotions before logic isn't fit to be a leader. Mostly women use emotions are made not be a leaders.
dont look at someones gender..look at their logic and thinking
Okay so I just read all those comments and all I can say is wow. I'm a guy and I've had some very calm cool and collected bosses that were female. My bosses made amazing choices for the companies and I was always able to work out the problems with them. Sure you all think hormonal changes affect them, and they do, I LIVE in a house of girls and although they complain at home, in public they are fine even though I know they're dying inside. You all need to look at reality, no one is a better leader weather it be male or female. Women have trouble with emotions and decisiveness and men have trouble with compassionate actions and feelings as well as creativity in a problem. We all have our ups and downs so I really don't understand why you all must think lower of one gender or the other. This video was based on opinions of people in surveys which I do agree can make the result a bit untrustworthy. Although these opinions of the people do have an impact.
The stereotypes that hold women back from leader roles are enforced by many people not just men but women too. Therefore eventually if a woman lives in that environment for a while she believes in those stereotypes even if they are taken away. This causes her to abide by them forcing herself to conform to them because she wants to be what society wants her to be. Also, isn't it the same with guys? we are told to hide our emotions, not to cry. We are told we should be muscular, cool and collected.
My final point is intelligence, some of you believe women are less intelligent than men. Although it may be true for some women you meet most women are extremely intelligent. I've met women who could solve very complex math problems in under a minute and come up with fantastic ideas to improve lives. Yet they are too afraid to step up because of an imaginary barrier from years of being told they aren't supposed to be that smart or do that certain thing as, I said earlier.
Just know I am a man coming up to say this because most men think they are too high and mighty to just admit we are all equal and any woman can be a leader if she works for it, same for men. The only barrier that keeps anyone from being a leader is the hard work it takes. No matter who you are, gender, race, religion, you can always try.
(THIS IS A STUPID LONG WALL OF TEXT. ALSO THIS IS JUST ME THROWING MY TWO CENTS IN SO DON'T EXPECT ME TO BE COMPLETELY RIGHT EITHER. THIS IS A MERE SOCIAL THEORY.)
That's pretty much all it bubbles down to...Both genders have their advantages and disadvantages. Which is why we as a human race HAVE to work hard for it in the first place and why we respect the hard workers. I've never really gotten a serious job or anything with a female leader (or a male leader). But this is the impression I am beginning to get with all the "Male Vs. Female" arguments.
Personally I don't really like the video (and I'm saying it as a woman). Mostly because it kinda feels like they are favoring females a bit more than they should. I mean, look at all the traits women have in comparison to the other three that men were given. Seriously? Even I know that is not even close to true.
I believe that women can be good leaders, but since (and I KNOW for a fact I will be called out for saying I'm some SJW feminist, even though I'm against third wave feminism and the basic SJW mindset) society kinda had no choice but to make women the nurturers and men the leaders, because of that women ended up not really given the chance too often. *I AM NOT SAYING THERE WAS A PATRIARCHY OF ANY KIND.* The only time I thought society was a bit sexist was when women weren't allowed to vote and got less pay when compared to a man at the same job they are given. And both those issues are long gone.
We as a human race had no choice but to make men the leaders/bread winners and women the more affectionate/nurturers during the past. We didn't have the technology or the scientific knowledge we now hold. It was our only way to survive, since that was a more biological role that we were accustomed to have.
Of course there will always be stereotypes, but really? Who gives a damn at this point? It's human nature for people to be rebellious at one point or another. So that really shouldn't be accustomed as a real crutch as it may have once been. Not to mention we have more scientific knowledge than ever, with this knowledge we can actually push back the original ideas of genders and their original intentions and actually try to improve on both genders and the human race as a whole. There is no need to put either gender down anymore. Misogyny and Misandry are both very poisonous mindsets and should be frowned upon. Women will learn to catch up, hell they almost succeeded (In the worst way possible imo but we are starting to learn) eventually there will be women who will just as great of leaders as the presidents we once had, it may just take longer due to the sacrifices we had to make in the past unfortunately.
But going back to what you said, you are right. It all bubbles down to hard work. We as women can either take our sweet ass time and blame others for our failures (#1 reason why I'm against third wave feminism and the SJW mindset). Or, we can actually work to meet up with the success that men have made, because all in all, to deny the success that men have made in the past is just plain ignorant. I truly do believe there are women who actually wanna help the world, the inventors and GOOD political models (not women like Hillary, she's a disgrace) are proof of that. Don't let the past get to you. Do what needs to be done. Even if it means playing catch up. You know what they say: Better late than never.
Tide Bleach so true
this scientific research seem to base on people preconceived notions and social view of women. It was very opinion oriented the only part at the end about bringing more money back to their state seems to imply that fund raising is the only prerequisite needed to be considered a good leader. I subscribe for science not opinion based studies.
True. This feels like the definition of feminism.
So we're talking stereotypes now, not science?
I don't care about the gender of the person in the office what makes him a good or bad leader is the reason they went for that position not their sex
#HillaryForPrison2016
Did you just say that the study asked what people THOUGHT were the prevalent traits of each gender? Because if you base your study on that, you are essentially gathering information on people's stereotypes, not actual leadership qualities. And if you present it as a valid study like you're doing in this video, you are saying that stereotyping is good.
Let's take a look at the list of traits you ascribe to women:
*Honest* - If you think women are more honest, I'd suggest you look at Hillary and compare her to Sanders. Then I want you to tell me with a straight face that she's more honest.
*Intelligent* - You must have missed all the studies measuring intelligence among adults, because almost all of them show a 2-5 IQ point advantage in favor of men.
*Hardworking* - Men work on average longer hours, are willing to do harder and more dangerous jobs and retire later, so the claim that women are equally or more hardworking is a blatant lie.
*Ambitious* - Look at the number of entrepreneurs and their goals. Or look at how many fortune 500 companies were founded by women.
*Outgoing* - If that were the case, we would see way more actually funny female comedians.
*Creative* - You should take a look at the people who get successful in arts and literature. Can you name even one successful female Hollywood director without googling it?
*Compassionate* - You should look at the feminist movement with their "Male Tears" cups or the hashtag #KillAllMen, especially when male genital mutilation, suicide and homelessness is discussed. Or Hillary's "women are the primary victims of war" bullshit. Or how much compassion they show when they are confronted with the fact that men have literally NO reproductive rights. Women's compassion is an act, while men have been supporting women and children from the dawn of time, with blood, sweat and tears. And if it's not enough, compare the rates of violence between gay and lesbian couples. And then the amount of violence against children done by single mothers vs single fathers. Women's compassion is the biggest lie in history.
So please stop spreading your bullshit propaganda. It's disgusting.
256shadesofgrey Thank you
Stay Alive brother
I'm genuinely curious. We should let women lead for a few months and we'll see how on paper looks in reality. Let's do it
Incidentally I'm reading a book about history of my country. From prehistoric times to present. We used to have grand dukes. They would control the land, they would be leaders of that land. Leading was not the only thing they had to do, they would have to go to war against neighbours. Know how to fight , yield swords, ride horses, and kill people to protect their families, this responsibility would give them the power to control over their lands. What army of women would stand proud and win against an equal number of army of men? None, and because women could not have done it ever in their lives that is why they never were leaders. Only now when most jobs can be made by women, be it statistically not as good as males, they still manage to get into leadership positions, due to watever reasons. But they are not buildt for that, exceptions of course exist, but just because there are albino ravens you cant say that ravens are white.
unsubscribed, this is just plain sexist men and women are equal and it comes down to the skills of an individual not wtf sex they are
+austin campbell You sir should have at least 200 likes
I think as men we should all caress our women on the cheek, give them a forehead kiss, assure them they're beautiful, and simply say "Yes baby girl, yes your a better leader than me okay sweetie". Come on fellas, it's not like we don't already pretend a lot of none sense is true just to keep their feelings from getting hurt. Like we don't already bend over backwards making sure she feels "important". I for one think the girl in the video and her cute zeal for her fellow women is just so adorable that I can't help but to just agree with her. It's not like I don't already literally tend to the emotions of my mother, sisters, female friends, and girlfriend as if I am handling a bomb. Like they don't explode in emotions and demand for me to be a man when I don't handle their heart as if it was made of glass. This is nothing new ladies we got you. Yes your better leaders, okay? But back to reality, when women begin in everyday life to lead me emotionally and physically like I do them, then I'll be open to them being better leaders.. Which lets be honest fellas, WE CAN ONLY WISH. Till then sweetie, be satisfied with us pretending that we are equals in mental stability, emotionally, and physically. FYI a lot of men now a days are pathetic excuses for men, and there definitely is plenty of women who do lead better. But that's individual verses individual, gender verses gender, you know. Now I'm going to re-watch this lady's adorable zeal. Fiery little eyes.
No gender is better than another we're all just ants on a rock floating in space.
They keep telling us that women are better than men but women are always saying that it's hard to be a woman.
I don't know, have you heard of the "women are wonderful" effect?
Since those are asking people what they think of their leaders not how they score in tests.
This results are pretty consistent with the "women are wonderful effect" something you could talk about next video, if you have any degree of honesty, of course.
It doesn't seem that the people disliking and complaining in the comment fully watched the video.
Get over your emotions people and stop being so easily triggered.
02:07 "both men and women would be EQUALLY GOOD at leadership"
03:23 "most people said men and women had EQUAL PROWESSES at leadership"
+FrozenEternity Probably has something to do with Lisette brazenly declaring that "Well, women DO make better leaders." right at the start of the video.
+FrozenEternity Yes, but you cannot deny that the opening statements of any video of this kind usually set it's tone. By making this declaration, even if it's not what she actually believes, a lot of people will think that it's her opinion and that she's rather biased.
Kitten Communism I agree that your reason is likely exactly what set them all to instantly dislike and go ranting in the comments. But it really is a sad state of things then these people that are watching a channel about research and science don't choose to listen to the full argument. People are just letting their own bias getting in the way of logic and reason
Agreed. I think that a lot of people are tired of hearing about gender issues and are getting more and more intolerant when the subject keeps being brought up.
Speaking from my perspective, I used to be a rather convinced feminist myself. But a lot of people abused the concept in the past few years and turned a lot of inconsequential things into dramatic gendered issues. "Manspreading" and the likes. The constant outcry we keep hearing about turns a lot of people off.
Welp, considering you just posted a Hillary ad on the Internet, you just lost all of your intelligent subscribers...
Answer: no
Long answer: no they are not
nothing against women, but disagree according to what I get to see, this applies to countries and companies.
pedro babe nobody asked
men:
-building a city
-fighting crimes
-pave the road
-generating electricity
-farming food for countless people
-protecting your liberty by going to war
-plumbing a community sewer
and
-other countless things keep society functioning
seeker with their bias facts: aRe woMEn BETter LeAdeR?
The gender of a person is not what makes a good leader. What makes a good leader is a person's values, ethics and norms, how they act. Not what sex they are. This study does not say that women are better leaders than men, but rather maybe there are more women suitable for a leaderjob than there are men suitable for a leaderjob. Although, it sounds like complete and utter bullshit :P
+Cradman
that seems to make more sense
Did I just watch a Hillary Clinton ad?
And did I just read a Donald Trump comment?
And did I just read a Kamala Harris Cope line? Women will never be great leaders. Stop coping you have a monthly cycle which makes you go crazy and hormonal and balanced and have the luxury of testosterone at 10 times the levels of women which creates stability, security, performance and ability to work mad hours and take action when needed. Women do not have character traits, other than stupid beta feminist articles like this that invent their own list of characteristics for leadership.
@@camrynvb5803 Yup
Women make better leaders is the funniest thing I've heard all day. Thanks for the laugh!
Lol, don't make me laugh. Let's take a look at the shittiest leaders
*Donald Trump
*Jair Bolsonaro
*Ron DeSantis
*Rick Scott
*Brian Kemp
*Rick Snyder
*Greg Abbott
*Mike Pence
And you’re better?
@@benjii0911 Probably
Very convenient to not include two more things that men typically are better at.
Independent thinking(less susceptible to social pressures), and projecting authority(no that's not just a cultural thing. Hormones play in on both of these)
And yes, all this is on average, and differences a small to moderate on all these metrics
Logically speaking, wouldn't both genders be equally good at leading? Gender wouldn't really affect this, it would be the traits of the specific person.
What logic are you talking about? Lol leadership is not by emotion and you have to be strong minded and women are naturally emotional people and weak minded compared to men so no this is not logical
if Bernie is a women then yes
Ooh. Bern!
This is the first DNews video with more dislikes than likes
+Jonathan Castgate A "science channel" should be impartial. It's not difficult to see what they were doing, and most people don't enjoy being manipulated.
Lawrence Oliver go back in the kitchen
Considering around 75% of ALL employees, male and female, prefer a male boss I think that is all that needs to be said. Women typically hate female bosses, and if you disagree, you disagree with facts. Sorry if that hurts your "feelings".
"Leaders are emotionally stable"
I have seen a lot of women who are emotionally unstable compared to men. but u might want to think before saying.
Women may be emotionally unstable but they’ll make better leaders than men! The future is under the rule of women! They say it all the time so it must be true! Facts are feelings anyways.
@@Alaskanman good joke! they say it just to pander women...so that they shut up!
The feminist agenda is strong with this one...
maybe you and those studies are right and women have better capabilities to be leaders, but at the end of the day what matters is reality; there is nothing stopping women to choose a career in politics, there are even affirmative actions to promote women in politics, but the majority still not interested...
... and then those same women (angry feminists) are the ones complaining about not being represented by their leaders [because a "white man" who dedicated his life to reach a position of power should be ashame of himself for being hardworking, ambitious and decisive]
Lol the cluelessness is strong with this one
But of course, the most important leadership quality is "desire to lead". Any individual who aces all the rest but chooses not to lead automatically becomes an inferior leader to the mediocre person who actually steps up to the plate. A mediocre leader who actually leads is going to get a lot more accomplished than the brilliant leader who never steps up.
I'm sure both men and women are equal leaders, just not Hillary..
Not true
i think that she would have at least made a better president than that thing
Reported for "Promotes Terrorism"
What? We don't have this in Germany!
JokerPoker5RP www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/study-women-are-better-leaders-2014-1
There has been great male leaders, and there has been great female leaders in history. No one gender is better than the other. This is like arguing that an apple is better than an orange because the apple is red.
better leaders make better leaders than leaders.
who gives a fuck if it's a man or women, you'd want the best person for the job.
Studies have shown that DNews is as close to be a scientific chanel as one direction to be a rock band
We're all for women leaders. That doesn't mean we're voting for Hillary..
Nobody told you to
Who is we?
Interesting but leadership is more of an individual's choice and feminine roles you showed are generalizations about genders. So even if women are better at leadership roles that doesn't mean all women will be good leaders. Everyone is capable of being good at leadership but being a leader is something you work at not inherit.
Angela Merkel has a great support from men behind doors. Most of the people don’t know that.
Religion men leads
In business men leads
In politics men leads
In coaching/sports men leads
If they were better leaders they would of been leading
most women put emotions towards action and that does not make a good leader.
How can women be better when also saying gender is a social construct? This video does not tell this, the feminists do...
People are saying "they should be equal" when they clearly did not listen to the whole video, because it clearly said that men and women would make equally good leaders. Also, everyone is upset because Hilary doesn't fit into some of these traits. Well duh, assuming that everyone in a group has the same traits is called stereotyping. Hilary does not represent all women, just like this study does not say that all women leaders have these traits. People only hear what they want to...
Then what is the point of this video if both genders are equally capable. This is like me making a video saying water is wet. Theirs absolutely no point whatsoever.
Daniel Boyas As they said in the video, there are a lot of people who say that a man would make a better leader when these studies would show otherwise. If everyone accepted that men and women were equal, then there would be no point to this video, but not everyone thinks like that. The point was to show those people, with science, that some women would make good leaders.
KittyLife They only people saying this are minorities groups that have no actual power.
Daniel Boyas Yeah, that could be true. I think they were just trying to let people know what past studies have shown, that's all.
There's not much science in this video...
I think they said men would make better leaders because decisive is 80% of the job
BREAKING: Hillary Clinton just bought out Dnews
Better video: Do sociopaths make better leaders than non-sociopaths? That's a much more interesting topic and you won't seem as sexist as the video like/dislike bar demonstrates.
Before watching the video, I'm just gonna guess based on the bias I've seen from this channel in the past, that the answer is "yes".
Edit: 0:05 Wow, wasn't expecting that my half-joking cynicism would be proven correct *that* quickly.
Men *(in general)* : are better at sports cause they are stronger, pain handling, etc.
Women *(in general)* : are better at noticing colour which can help with cooking and better at communicating which can help with teaching
Then why are famous chefs usually men. And professors too
Oh cmon leadership needs a fuckload of emotional stability, ive had female bosses , its a disaster, you cant make rational decisions if your emotions are all over the place doesn't matter how good you are in anything else.women are good in alot of stuff just not as leaders
All the men are pressed. DNews has their receipts.
Stupid DNews, we are neither patriarchal or matriarchal. We are democratal.
+Professor Retr0
you obviously dont watch enough of their videos to talk about that
something a while back that murica aint a true democracy even founding leaders said so because something about a large crowd cannot be effective
also because they have a single leader + congress, and they have the power not the civilians, BUt you might argue that the people vote them in, Yes, but they have the power unless in the president, more then half the states dont legally have to vote for your chosen in electoral college, and a few videos back about donald trump and republican democrazy, how ted won with 0 votes
its not an easy debate, too many factors and gray areas to say they are a democracy(in full)
Austin Pinheiro
dude it was a joke
Rarest Pepe
-well so are you-
unsubscribed till i hear an apology
+shameer aboobacker They won't care, you dummy. Stop trying to make yourself seem so important.
Margen67 lol I'm so offended :)
Phanteus
no no im with u this unsubscribing guy is a misogynist
@@Margen67 You were 100% drooling while typing that
I'm a bernie supporter. Now that that's out of the way I'd like to ask why everyone is hating on this video? I think their message regarding the american election wasn't "you should vote for Hilary" rather "don't not vote for Hillary because she's a women".
yeah I'm on the same page as you, I want to view this from a scientific stance. I hate Trump cus he's possible tyrant and Hillary is corrupt and pretentious so I wouldn't touch her if I could vote which sadly I can't yet
Christianna Taylor you should definitely campaign (eg phone bank etc) if you aren't already. Power to the people
Rupe Dodkins yeah I think I can post things hopefully people who are able to vote seize this opportunity to have a president who actually wants to legitly progress our country towards a better future :^)
If there are studies that say women aren't as decisive as men, i can see that would just add to stress, or make that constant feeling of you wanting to change your mind afterwards. Then arises the chance for compromise. That comes from compassion. A wedge for vulnerability in a decision based job.
And then there's Hillary Clinton. I swear she doesn't represent all of us.
Right, this question is just pointless, some women are better than men vice versa, doing this as a video is just stupid.
Is this an exercise in positive re-enforcement? You know… The more you say it the more you believe it…
Women can innovate this is the joke of the millennium
So can we all just agree that we should pick leaders based on their individual skills, not on their genitalia.
May I remind you that this is a science channel?
Equally good is what you should take away from this. we are equal but not the same.
I agree that men and women are equally good at leading people. It depends on the individual.
+Robert Faust No they aren't on average. I'm not saying men are better leaders automatically, but they are on average.
Quit this liberal fucking nonsense.
@@eviltree6779 The trump supporter is strong is this comment.
It is wrong to use generalization of gender when considering leaders, leaders are in the spotlight. their actions and opinions are judge by their people. leaders are a select few who should be elected by merit, popularity and policy stances. one gender/race should irrelevant.
0:39 You lost me there. Everyone knows overall men are way more stable with their emotions than woman