And yet, he's miles ahead of everyone else there who neither understood that a spacecraft shouldn't be in thousands of pieces, nor that there were no people on this test flight.
@@kenbob1071 They are not; do some research before talking nonsense. The number of electric cars catching fire spontaneously is many times higher than those with conventional engines. Producing EV batteries consumes significant energy and resources, potentially outweighing the lifetime emissions savings compared to combustion-engine vehicles. Extracting lithium, cobalt, and other rare materials for batteries often involves environmentally damaging mining practices, which can pollute water and soil. In some regions, cobalt mining (a key battery component) has been linked to unethical labor practices. Properly recycling or disposing of large battery packs can be complicated and may lead to toxic waste if mishandled.
@victorbarberis2603 ICE vehicles catch fire far more often than EVs. Look it up. And yes EVs are much better for the environment. Try using Google before making statements that are so easily disproven.
Early indications are a fuel leak caused all engines to shut down. Without propulsion Starships flight termination system kicked in and purposefully destroyed the ship.
@@megaknight3705 not exactly, only 3 of the 6 engines (the centre 3) can steer the ship in flight and landing, and they all failed, all 5 of 6 failed then it exploded or detonated from flight termination, but exploded is more likely.
Yes they managed to do something no one else has done land a rocket on a tower ,land a rocket on it’s legs and launch every other week so I agree it’s superb
In moments like this, many people in the comment sections become rocket experts despite not even knowing what happens under the hood of their own cars.
I don't know much about rocket telemetry, but you'd think the FAA wouldn't have cordoned off a certain time-frame and distance from launch to landing for these occasions. "It'll never happen, but JUST IN CASE."
So half the rocket landed safely, and the half that was in space exploded? Sorry, unexpectedly disassembled into a fiery storm in space? I wonder what happened, I tend to think once in space you are kinda safe from facilitated dismantlement.
It was a prototype rocket that was always intended to be destroyed by landing in the ocean but there was a fault obviously. The booster launched, returned to pad and was caught out the air, which was a total success. If you want to talk about tax payer cost the last rocket NASA built cost tens of billions of dollars and took around ten years to build. This rocket cost million and there will be another on the launch pad next month.
So smart , did any one get the message from ( x) boss ???? Gravity!!?!?! Flat earth or round?!?!? Where is the science?!?!?! To explain what we are watching
The title of this video is it lie. they take account for this being a possibility and have a whole zone where planes and boats are off-limits just in case something like this happens during launch so no, they did not have to swerve, when you zoom in on something it makes it look closer when all reality it could be over 80 miles away
"Swerve" was a poor choice of descriptor.... but yes indeed planes did have to ADJUST their flight paths. But the word 'adjust' doesn't have the clickability.
I really dislike Elon Musk ... but I really, really like SpaceX. It's sad to see one of the Starships explode. Musk needs to stop dicking around with idiotic right wing politics and get back to work.
Oh no looks like this wasnt very nominal. Haha oopsie poopsie, elon should stick to playing video games, oh wait he pays people to play games for him. He did put a car into outer space.
This is why NASA makes sure they know what they're doing before launching. Elon criticizes them for being careful, while this debris could easily come down on a city.
@@scottk3292 Challenger. "Throttle up!" Oops! Despite concerns, that flight went ahead. What rockets does NASA make? NASA contracts Space X, so that would imply that Space X knows what it's doing.
@@scottk3292nonsense. The debris is burning up in the atmosphere and any small bits that may survive will land in the ocean, that’s why the flight path is entirely over water. NASA spends 20billion and 10 years on one rocket and they still blow up. Spacex builds them dirt cheap and pushes to the limit to learn what they need to improve, the data they get from a failure is worth more than a flawless success, every new rocket has hundreds of improvements on the previous.
@@scottk3292 NASA blew up plenty of rockets and got their fair share of people killed before starting a brand new program called Apollo that you came to know and love. Blue Origin adopted the NASA mentality of moving slowly and cautiously, and their first booster landing also resulted in failure. It's widely known in aerospace that rapid prototyping and iteration results in more robust outcome.
@@scottk3292 Oh please. If you studied the last shuttle disaster you'd know that statistics said there was a nearly 100% chance the O-ring would fail and NASA launched anyway. While NASA had the reputation of being careful documentaries have shown they were often negligent.
This is bad even for The Sun. This rocket stayed completely within its well-know launch corridor all the way through breakup. Commercial airline pilots know about the launch in advance and maintain a safe distance from the launch corridor airspace. There was no "swerving" of airplanes in the sky.
It is a documented fact that planes had to change courses because of this flying debris. Ok, you don’t have to call it “swerve”, I don’t care what people call it but it DID impact planes at several airports. It is called “an abundance of caution”.
This is a good indication that maybe we should consider that we are not yet ready for the implementation of this new technology and much more work on safety and consequences is needed.
Thankfully, that's what tests flights are all about: figuring out what went wrong, so that it can be safe for people to use. Computer simulations are always safe, but are never the real thing.
If people operated with that attitude we wouldn't even have airplanes, we would've never built ships, and likely would still be in caves because ya know a couple of huts fell over
@@longrolstral I agree to some degree. Things do have to start somewhere. Currently we are pushing things way to fast with technology truth be known is not always fully understood. It is one thing to test in a safe environment it is quite another to do testing out in the open with no regard for the normal activities and possible endangerment of people on the ground is just insane.
@@qunngiaqti We always launch at the coasts for that exact reason - If a failure occurs, it occurs over the open ocean. If you are on a boat that gets hit by a failed rocket falling back to earth, I don't know what to tell you - the odds of that are incalculably low.
We are not yet ready for this. There were 135 Space shuttle missions, 2 were lost. The analogon: Would you drive with a car with 5kg TNT below the seat, and one in every 70 engine-starts the car blows up? Now sketch the psychological profile of the pilots or astronauts....
No plane had to swerve ! the ''danger zone'' was activated before spacex launched because /everyone/ knew this was a possibility, well everyone but employees of the Sun youtube channel apparently.
Planes forced to “swerve” is about the dumbest title or statement I’ve seen today 🙄
Irl space and high altitude craft are fragile and the smallest pieces of metal can pass through walls and flesh in an instant.
💯
@ there are no houses in the ocean
@@LifewithLewy There are lots of small islands, where people live.. in the ocean
@ none directly in the path. You see videos that make it look close but it’s still miles and miles away
"No this is not right, something exploded." Sherlock is on the case guys. Good god 😭😭 lol 😂
Your comment beat me to it... was thinking... "Yah think??". At least one of them figured it out....
Captain obvious
@@rangerrick8220 Before I saw this post, I made that same exact comment. It’s amazing that someone said that out loud… 😂
And yet, he's miles ahead of everyone else there who neither understood that a spacecraft shouldn't be in thousands of pieces, nor that there were no people on this test flight.
And he was the smartest person in the whole group. 😅
Expensive fireworks. Just like a Cyber truck.
Or like regular fossil fuel burning vehicles since they're much more likely to catch fire.
@@kenbob1071 They are not; do some research before talking nonsense. The number of electric cars catching fire spontaneously is many times higher than those with conventional engines. Producing EV batteries consumes significant energy and resources, potentially outweighing the lifetime emissions savings compared to combustion-engine vehicles. Extracting lithium, cobalt, and other rare materials for batteries often involves environmentally damaging mining practices, which can pollute water and soil. In some regions, cobalt mining (a key battery component) has been linked to unethical labor practices. Properly recycling or disposing of large battery packs can be complicated and may lead to toxic waste if mishandled.
@@kenbob1071 Nice try Mr. Propaganda. ICE vehicles don't spontaneously combust like EVs do. But keep trying.
@victorbarberis2603 ICE vehicles catch fire far more often than EVs. Look it up. And yes EVs are much better for the environment. Try using Google before making statements that are so easily disproven.
@@Isaac_132 Do a little research. ICE vehicles catch fire all the time.
it didn't explode, it's an unplanned rapid disassembly
tomato/tomato.
😂😂😂😂
Wow people are so dumb
Was not an explosion
it was a Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly
Now thats original.
Like Putin's Special Military Operation.
Yet people still believe earth is flat
All of them Trump voters....we are really screwed.
Early indications are a fuel leak caused all engines to shut down. Without propulsion Starships flight termination system kicked in and purposefully destroyed the ship.
and destroyed whatever the debris landed on.
@@scottk3292 the water? 🤣
but Starship's each engine has enough thrust. if 1 or 2 engines fails other engines can alone provide the required thrust at max capacity.
@@scottk3292 Rockets launched in America only fly on flight paths that couldn't drop back on land. This ain't the China space program.
@@megaknight3705 not exactly, only 3 of the 6 engines (the centre 3) can steer the ship in flight and landing, and they all failed, all 5 of 6 failed then it exploded or detonated from flight termination, but exploded is more likely.
"We lost the main ship but the liftoff was on time!!!"
What the heck is with the ethereal dreamy music?
I often think people overuse the "people are NPCs" line, but man... it do be like that
“This thing has exploded.” 😂😂😂😂
Gee, ya think? 😁
They must have been violating the flight restrictions, so hopefully they are ticketed by the FAA.
Oooo someone lost their vote
expensive firework
There is a metaphor here...I just dont want to say it
I got censored for a Space Shuttle comment.
@@Isaac_132RUclips has the worst censors of comments
I said it.
@@Isaac_132 "Ooops!"
Luckily no people or Teslas on board....
Can we get musk on one of these missions please?
Oh, I just had that thought!!!!
All this for a payload of Big Macs & tRump sneakers to Mars.
Falling debris and a expert knew "this is not right something exploded" 😂😂😂
Ah the superb Space X engineering.
Yes they managed to do something no one else has done land a rocket on a tower ,land a rocket on it’s legs and launch every other week so I agree it’s superb
Say you’re too stupid to understand rocket science without actually saying you’re too stupid to understand it.
Click bait. No planes were "forced to SWERVE" b/c of rocket debris.
they were actually required to turn around
Yes they were
How does "swerve" not apply to the dozens of aircraft that had to abruptly change direction to avoid the debris path?
@@llYossarianyou mean the zero planes that had to turn around because of the debris path
@@markmontagna7637 Russia is always in our social media. Never forget. They will be there fighting against truth with every story.
Incredible footage!
Elon: "but on the video game version it worked great!!!!"
So thats what 21k+ mph looks like from the ground.
Why wasn't the airspace closed?
Yes, the word swerve is misleading
I wonder if an Airprox will be filed? A commercial airline may have a few questions to answer...
It was, there was a massive no fly zone… it looks close but it isn’t.
We got exploding space x rockets before GTA
well. we have had them for a decade now.
In moments like this, many people in the comment sections become rocket experts despite not even knowing what happens under the hood of their own cars.
I don't know much about rocket telemetry, but you'd think the FAA wouldn't have cordoned off a certain time-frame and distance from launch to landing for these occasions. "It'll never happen, but JUST IN CASE."
Elon trying to take out commercial aircraft now.
That will save LOTS of money!!!! DOGE strikes again.
Not allowed to post“Such beautiful debris😂”
Ridiculous
First one needs to rapidly zoom in and out another 30 times to be artistic.
And he wants to make driverless cars ?
and what have you made for humanity?
@@ddtddt11 that is a wonderful question, i think we all know the answer :)
Scene wall omen end, extinction of humanity
@1:18 Mansplained that dude.
The debris risk was published on Norad two weeks in advance. The pilots knew this before they took off
And no place “swerved” lmao
@@LifewithLewy maybe not swerved but multiple flights went into holding pattern because of it.
@@evanelledev7237 only flights with incompetent pilots
unscheduled rapid disassembly..
Si un pájaro tumbó un avión, los restos de la space x destruyen un tanque de guerra.
It looks so cool
So half the rocket landed safely, and the half that was in space exploded? Sorry, unexpectedly disassembled into a fiery storm in space? I wonder what happened, I tend to think once in space you are kinda safe from facilitated dismantlement.
Beautiful sight though.
Fascinating times when you can tell who someone voted for by the comment they leave in a rocket launch video. Amazing
I lost interest when I realised Musk wasn't onboard. One day, eh...
you're like a pizza cutter.. all edge, no point
On board what?
@@InterestingFlow1 The Starship capsule that was some of that debris…
He's not going anywhere, he has a country to run.
22 idiots have agreed with you thus far
Elon lights the Shabbat !
Is _The Sun_ going to censor my "looks like the space shuttle" comment?
Its the sun, they probably used old stock footage other than doing actual reporting....
A space X/Boeing project perhaps?
Space hotel 2029. Let's go.
This is what happens when you lie about being one of the best video gamers in the world, god smited that rocket.
Where did all that debris land? Was anyone hurt?
whats with ur name and u know answer... if not change name and become a peasant
Half a billion dollar taxpayer money FAILURE AGAIN???😂😂😂 TRUMP FAILURE AGAIN!!!😂😂😂
spacex is funded by elon, not the government or taxpayer money
Obama initiated the privatization of the space program chief
It was a prototype rocket that was always intended to be destroyed by landing in the ocean but there was a fault obviously.
The booster launched, returned to pad and was caught out the air, which was a total success.
If you want to talk about tax payer cost the last rocket NASA built cost tens of billions of dollars and took around ten years to build. This rocket cost million and there will be another on the launch pad next month.
@Rottiek9000 Wow, what does Trump have to do with it?
And what does your psychiatrist say about that?
Can it still be treated or is it too late?
NASA should build its own rockets like in 1969.
Elon you are a genius that is so cool to see that tower work so well
Lies, that's the eye of Aldhani
C'mon, planes dont swerve, be real and stop this click bait nonsense !!
Absolutely misleading headlines, shame on these losers .
The most safest transportation ever. Who want a ride?.
FDT and Elmo
Were did it all land ? Lets hope no one woke up to space Rocket in the back garden ,
I think it gets disintegrated but not really sure
Debris Dodge, soon to be followed by DOGE debris...
Crazy….never believe the narrative though. Question everything.
I"m questioning your comment, what's to question regarding this madness? What? 😐
Are a bit “special” or something? What is there to question! There is NOTHING to question here. You might need your head checking mate.
What are you blathering on about? 😭 There's no nuance here my guy just the remains of Starship 7 burning up in the atmosphere lol 😂
@@dianegreen1937 Dude probably some conspiracy theorist. Pathetic. He probably thinks aliens or something were involved lol
HigthTech toys very dangerous......
Ha ha ha ha ha do people still read the Sun?
So smart , did any one get the message from ( x) boss ????
Gravity!!?!?!
Flat earth or round?!?!?
Where is the science?!?!?! To explain what we are watching
I highly doubt any planes are that high who is the sun employing thats thinks this?
WOW! This channel is clickbaiting really hard!
why is this channel spreading misinformation. report this
It's _The Sun_ misinformation is their forte.
they don't care who's life they ruin for a story.
Which Insurance Company does Elon use. Sure some folk in LA would appreciate the number.
Thank goodness new Glen done better .
lol really? I didn’t see a booster catch
The title of this video is it lie. they take account for this being a possibility and have a whole zone where planes and boats are off-limits just in case something like this happens during launch so no, they did not have to swerve, when you zoom in on something it makes it look closer when all reality it could be over 80 miles away
"Swerve" was a poor choice of descriptor.... but yes indeed planes did have to ADJUST their flight paths. But the word 'adjust' doesn't have the clickability.
Future of USA under Elon's friend.
Get real
Burning stuff. So much for the goody two shoes Tesla.
downvoting this merely for the clickbait misleading (i mean dumb) title
I really dislike Elon Musk ... but I really, really like SpaceX. It's sad to see one of the Starships explode. Musk needs to stop dicking around with idiotic right wing politics and get back to work.
Must be a brainless lefty
he needs to get in that spaceship and take control at 80km high preferably
Oh no looks like this wasnt very nominal. Haha oopsie poopsie, elon should stick to playing video games, oh wait he pays people to play games for him. He did put a car into outer space.
I was tracking those planes and non of them veered off course, downvote/don't recommend this channel :)
It's just a little preview of what President *Musk* is going to do to the US economy
I think elon should just make exploding rockets it looks beautiful im sure rich bored people will buy it for event's
Owell advancement doesnt come wirh out trial and error
This is why NASA makes sure they know what they're doing before launching. Elon criticizes them for being careful, while this debris could easily come down on a city.
@@scottk3292 Challenger. "Throttle up!" Oops! Despite concerns, that flight went ahead. What rockets does NASA make? NASA contracts Space X, so that would imply that Space X knows what it's doing.
@@scottk3292nonsense. The debris is burning up in the atmosphere and any small bits that may survive will land in the ocean, that’s why the flight path is entirely over water.
NASA spends 20billion and 10 years on one rocket and they still blow up. Spacex builds them dirt cheap and pushes to the limit to learn what they need to improve, the data they get from a failure is worth more than a flawless success, every new rocket has hundreds of improvements on the previous.
@@scottk3292 NASA blew up plenty of rockets and got their fair share of people killed before starting a brand new program called Apollo that you came to know and love. Blue Origin adopted the NASA mentality of moving slowly and cautiously, and their first booster landing also resulted in failure. It's widely known in aerospace that rapid prototyping and iteration results in more robust outcome.
@@scottk3292 Oh please. If you studied the last shuttle disaster you'd know that statistics said there was a nearly 100% chance the O-ring would fail and NASA launched anyway. While NASA had the reputation of being careful documentaries have shown they were often negligent.
Surprise!!!!
......Another Lie from the Sun
Success as usual
Cause more forest fires?
Over the ocean?? 😂😂😂
This is bad even for The Sun.
This rocket stayed completely within its well-know launch corridor all the way through breakup. Commercial airline pilots know about the launch in advance and maintain a safe distance from the launch corridor airspace. There was no "swerving" of airplanes in the sky.
It is a documented fact that planes had to change courses because of this flying debris. Ok, you don’t have to call it “swerve”, I don’t care what people call it but it DID impact planes at several airports. It is called “an abundance of caution”.
There was no "swerving", but there was "adjusting" flight paths in response to the explosion.
This is a good indication that maybe we should consider that we are not yet ready for the implementation of this new technology and much more work on safety and consequences is needed.
Thankfully, that's what tests flights are all about: figuring out what went wrong, so that it can be safe for people to use. Computer simulations are always safe, but are never the real thing.
@@longrolstral say that again when some of the debre fell on your house or even you.
If people operated with that attitude we wouldn't even have airplanes, we would've never built ships, and likely would still be in caves because ya know a couple of huts fell over
@@longrolstral I agree to some degree. Things do have to start somewhere. Currently we are pushing things way to fast with technology truth be known is not always fully understood. It is one thing to test in a safe environment it is quite another to do testing out in the open with no regard for the normal activities and possible endangerment of people on the ground is just insane.
@@qunngiaqti We always launch at the coasts for that exact reason - If a failure occurs, it occurs over the open ocean. If you are on a boat that gets hit by a failed rocket falling back to earth, I don't know what to tell you - the odds of that are incalculably low.
Amazing video kind of sad at the same time 😢
We are not yet ready for this. There were 135 Space shuttle missions, 2 were lost.
The analogon: Would you drive with a car with 5kg TNT below the seat, and one in every 70 engine-starts the car blows up?
Now sketch the psychological profile of the pilots or astronauts....
we did this in the 60s for the moon landing… we are more than ready
You probably not even born yet when rockets were exploding back in the 60s testing rockets for the moon many failures on the launch pad
BS News.😂
CLICK BAIT
I tho
Propaganda
Spacexex is dud. Employ some indians as nasa
No plane had to swerve ! the ''danger zone'' was activated before spacex launched because /everyone/ knew this was a possibility, well everyone but employees of the Sun youtube channel apparently.
Msm gloating on a mishap, what about the southport $tabber
And people still believe we landed on the Moon
NASA went to the moon. Not Space X.
@@ronagoodwell2709 No one went to the Moon
@@faceit- And after NASA faked it, they faked it five more times just to be sure. And the earth is flat, right?
@@dominicestebanrice7460 The Earth is not flat, but they lied about the Moon landing
"If I can't do it, its made up and no one can do it" - You
Better buy Russian made rocket engines, their technology is already matured.
Buy chines rockets they are good and working.
Lmao 😂😂 and they never could create a full flow stage
Chines rockets work better.
Chinese had a very bad accident where part of a nearby town was taken out.
Nice one Elon. Anything else left you wanna trash?
This is an adult conversation.. sit down child
To trust Ukraine is not to respect yourself! From Mariupol. DPR! 🇷🇺
was president musk in there?😁
Stupid elon musk and his stupid ambitions