‘So You Don’t Know?’: Edwards Presses Regan On Number Of New EPA Employees Addressing Climate Change

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 апр 2024
  • During a House Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) grilled EPA Administrator Michael Regan about his budget request for new employees.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes.com/membership...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

Комментарии • 54

  • @ericshellhamer9847
    @ericshellhamer9847 28 дней назад +26

    Do you ever get the feeling that these cabinet members have no clue what they are doing

    • @nordan00
      @nordan00 28 дней назад +5

      With this administration, all the time. If this administration has done anything, it’s provided a frightening glimpse of America under a widespread DEI regime. This regime is stocked with a diverse array of midwits obviously unqualified for the positions they fill. It’s actually embarrassing.

    • @danastrong1747
      @danastrong1747 27 дней назад +2

      @@nordan00 You are so right. I watch a lot of these hearings and am amazed continuously at how ill-informed these cabinet members are. They do not communicate well, feel insulted to have oversight and just refuse to answer questions.

    • @SamhainBe
      @SamhainBe 27 дней назад +2

      Every time they open their mouths...DEI on parade.

  • @timothypowell5687
    @timothypowell5687 28 дней назад +17

    A b ol ish the E P A!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @ImprovmanZero
    @ImprovmanZero 28 дней назад +10

    He asked about small farmers the answer was large farmers love it

  • @Tampahop
    @Tampahop 27 дней назад +5

    Just another public servant who refuses to admit that the government has any sort of oversight power for their agency. I would love to see people fired for not providing answers to their questions.

  • @sirkronix5274
    @sirkronix5274 28 дней назад +7

    DEI 😂

  • @DPA373
    @DPA373 28 дней назад +4

    Way to go Chuck let them have it!

  • @laymongiles7109
    @laymongiles7109 27 дней назад +5

    F the EPA

  • @ruthnovena40
    @ruthnovena40 28 дней назад +5

    is it to measure cow gas>

  • @user-jk3mi2ee9z
    @user-jk3mi2ee9z 27 дней назад +5

    Leave our farmers alone and stop the spraying of dangerous chemicals being forced on them

  • @patrickdonovan5056
    @patrickdonovan5056 27 дней назад +3

    Utter BS! Lost any form of credibility when they utter the words "circle back". Seems like they are reading off of a a script that is written for them.

  • @rodbarton4553
    @rodbarton4553 28 дней назад +1

    Can you believe this sh----+--++

  • @jamesmcd71
    @jamesmcd71 27 дней назад +1

    Its gov growth for the sake of gov growth.

  • @TracyBrown-xr9mr
    @TracyBrown-xr9mr 22 дня назад

    Thank God trumps coming back

  • @derekmadsen9702
    @derekmadsen9702 28 дней назад +1

    Does the epa believe a birds egg or turtle egg is a life? How much time would a farmer get for running over eggs with a tractor?

  • @gingermolina8356
    @gingermolina8356 23 дня назад

    So no more money for them

  • @Dstew57A
    @Dstew57A 27 дней назад

    “The inflation reduction act” How’s that working out for everybody?

  • @laymongiles7109
    @laymongiles7109 27 дней назад +1

    old slick spot got stuck

  • @jayhub1982
    @jayhub1982 27 дней назад +1

    The plan for De-growth

  • @nunyabiznes4471
    @nunyabiznes4471 27 дней назад

    I hate the EPA. This fool is an example of why it should be disbanded.

  • @garyi8284
    @garyi8284 21 день назад

    EPA needs to be shut down.

  • @SamhainBe
    @SamhainBe 27 дней назад +1

    And you wonder why we need Trump back in the White House?

  • @TracyBrown-xr9mr
    @TracyBrown-xr9mr 22 дня назад

    Get rid of the epa.offer companies incentives if they pollute less

  • @michaelkrzyzaniak1045
    @michaelkrzyzaniak1045 27 дней назад

    More regulation equal higher prices period. And hey they get to grow the government even bigger which means more taxes

  • @jerrycoronado6887
    @jerrycoronado6887 27 дней назад

    It takes 2K personnel to design ecology standards? Hmmm I get it. The EPA designs the rules to justify the increase in personnel who design more rules to justify further increases in personnel ad infinitum. Makes total sense.😂

  • @iceman9678
    @iceman9678 27 дней назад

    @contextwarning What is long term?

  • @jackiechilds8047
    @jackiechilds8047 27 дней назад

    Lispy

  • @christopherhines2109
    @christopherhines2109 23 дня назад

    He needs hair plugs😂

  • @peterscott133
    @peterscott133 27 дней назад

    This guys answers are circular, with no real answer given.

  • @tomnickisher4982
    @tomnickisher4982 23 дня назад

    Democrats creat more jobs in the regulatory department which makes prices of goods go through the roof

  • @user-tj5vn5kl5y
    @user-tj5vn5kl5y 27 дней назад

    DEI hire

  • @ttfahd
    @ttfahd 22 дня назад

    silly speaking man gonna circle back

  • @Max-dk5vz
    @Max-dk5vz 27 дней назад

    They try to shove cost after cost with a stupid smile on their faced and always use the phrase " for our children."

  • @izzy7067
    @izzy7067 27 дней назад

    This guy is a government jibberish speaker. He talks alot while saying nothing.

  • @dogartoppenheimer
    @dogartoppenheimer 27 дней назад

    Wtf is going on with this guys hair?

  • @tonyv416
    @tonyv416 28 дней назад +1

    Man has no effect on maintaining the earth or any other planets temperature..

  • @tonyv416
    @tonyv416 28 дней назад

    What damn con artist