After watching you disassemble the B.A.R. and talk about how the U.S. version was harder. I have greater respect for my father. He carried a B.A.R. during world War two in France. He never mentioned how hard it was to maintain.
It’s really interesting to me how similar to the mag-58 or m240 series the bolt, gas plug and piston are. At a glance you could be forgiven for thinking they came from a 240. It’s neat that FN looked at those designs and went “if it ain’t broke…”
The whole M14 project has a lot problems besides no pistol grip. As far as the BAR, I think the mag release is more a significant upgrade than the pistol grip. Just a personal opinion
Blaster from another age, all the curves, bevels and dovetails make it look like like an artisan built piece. Even the bluing on an old gun still holds up because sections were highly polished.
The rate reduction system seems overly complicated. I am assuming modifications to the bolt or recoil spring were not practical for some reason. I wonder how robust that rack and pinion system is.
My uncle Art was the hunter in family (his stories of hunting for the mess hall with a M1 carbine while on occupation duty in Germany were classics). He had been an infantryman late 44-45 on the Western Front. He told me once, that after Bulge they got some strange looking BAR's with pistol grips and finned barrels to give two guns to a squad. As I got to know firearms better, I doubted his story - maybe just a mistaken memory of 30 years before. Then I discovered the Model 30. Did FN have some 30-06 Model 30's in stock that had sat in a warehouse since 1940? Did it make new barrels or rechamber existing Model 30's in other calibers? How did the US Army get ahold of them? Mysteries we'll almost surely never know the answer to.
My stepfather had a BAR-D in Canada. It had been converted to single shot by cutting off the gas piston, and welding the gas system and bbl latch. A travesty I know but kept it from the cutters torch, until it was consumed in a Fire
I have two. One is a pre 1939 model with a slot for a holster stock (which I don't have and don't want, thank you) and the other is 1976 build with a beautiful bluing job, walnut grips and target sights as I shooting competitively back then. As I was living on post, I kept it in the company arms room. Apparently, the armorer had never seen anything but parkerized M1911A1's, fell in love with it and showed it to the First Sergeant. So I was greeted one morning with, "That's quite a pistol you have, El Tee." I just grinned, "It sure is, Top"
I find it really cool that you can look at the swapping of parts on the gas piston/plug and see how it is incrementally becoming closer to the M240/FN Mag gas system, which uses the same bolt and piston system over a century of history from the original BAR to the Lima variant, and not a whole ton has changed internally
You are a such a blessing Ian. I am making a video game featuring rare older fire arms and every time I think of something I would like to add, you do a full breakdown of it. Thank you so much.
We still use these beauty even today in 30-06 caliber, mainly by our Navy (mostly by ship crew, sailor and naval base personel). FN D just like the Madsen can serve really well for decades
I mean if it aint broke. Seriously though I'm sure there are plenty of older rifles that can still be quite viable in modern situations. Even if they aren't top of the line.
@@tomhenry897 Interesting. I would've thought the men who had M1 Garands got M14s and BAR men M60s. So were the BARs replaced by the standard M14s or a special LMG version with bipod and heavy barrel?
@@hendriktonisson2915pretty much, nomenclature M15, short lived obviously. If you ever played CoD black ops, and saw the M14 and said that looks wrong, that's because it was modeled after the M15. Edit: did a double check, apparently no M15s were actually built, they just used M14E2s/M14A1s. Ian did a video about it like 8 years ago
True when I was a freshman in Army ROTC 1970-71 we still had some to familiarize with as some low priority units still had them. Complicated to field strip with lots of little parts to get lost. Not a fun time in the field.
Some of the Chinese KMT 1933-39 contract of these have been seen with the Japanese triangle 'captured re-issue' mark. It's always amazing to think of the variety of people who used guns of a particular iconic origin!
We pronounce the T in trente because there is an E after the T, otherwise it would be silent indeed ! Good work dude, your pronunciation is starting to be outstanding
I wonder what happened to all the tooling for the FN30 when WW2 started. You didn't see any German manufactured BARs, implying the tooling wasn't available to them. The Germans were quite good at taking over factories and continuing production for their own forces. Did the Germans just not appreciate the weapon when they conquered Belgium, or was the tooling destroyed?
I don't think the Wehrmacht were interested in the BAR, or in the Browning 1917. They used the 7.92x57mm guns they captured in Poland. But didn't continue production of either weapon in during their Occupations of Belgium and Poland. Apart from pistols, FN was used to make components for German gunmakers, including Walther. And also military motorcycle/sidecar combinations.
My guess is that most of FNs technical and management staff fled to the UK, so the Germans couldn't make good use of the tooling. The Reich was already short one both, and you can't just lapanka some Poles to crank out BARs.
I don't know exactly why, but there is something so appealing about this gun, i felt very similar for the M1907 as well Might be called "Browning Charm", as a diagnosed phenomenon, i am not sure
I remember going through Tanker OSUT and working on the M2 and M240. Any time we had a pin or, especially, a detent to pull to a specific point to see in a hole in the receiver or frame our Drill Sergeant would say, "You got to see the titty in the window." It was a different time.
@@kenneth9874 I fired a ZB-26 but even if I didn't, comparing a Bren to a Grease gun is so stupid, anyone who knows anything about those guns is facepalming.
Is it just me, or does it seem really crazy to include a rate reducer that works by making it harder for the bolt to return forward and go fully into battery through just pure friction from having to push a lever out of the way? That seems like it would be inviting malfunctions.
He rarely does battle history unless it's a specific firearm used by an individual. His channel is largely the broad history of firearms from a technical, technological, and logistical viewpoint.
I didn't scan through all the comments so apologies if somebody else already covered it but... while the updated mag release does look nice... form a pure military / law enforcement perspective... I like the original button mag release as, with proper training, I think one is just as fast as the other and, to me, I would be concerned about unintentional mag drops with the sliding release... e.g. it gets snagged on something or in "the heat of battle, the user getting "excited" and accidentally grabs the release instead of the trigger 😮
No, FN developed the M1930 after the Poles had adopted their version of BAR. Most Browning wz 1928 guns were made in Poland, under licence. With only the initial batch of Colt made guns being bought from FN.
The BAR was 18 or so pounds and the fbi version was 16 pounds. A lot of weight for an average soldier to carry around. The m14 itself was around 9llb. Imagine if they made the fbi version in 7.62 x 39 or in the kurtz round. They could have had the fn fal but the ordinance board would not allow it.
After watching this breakdown, I have to say despite the massive amount of machining, the bren gun is better. I can't imagine having to field strip in austere conditions
I had the opportunity in 94 to buy an original select fire BAR for 1700 plus 200 for the class 3 tax. I turned it down. If any of you invent a time machine I can go back and punch myself in the face.
Speaking of FN, and you did the teaser video of “The Most Expensive MG Ever Sold”… all I want for Christmas is the FN Minimi formal history and mechanics episode and it’s coming soon on almost definitely Christmas of this year 2023.
Dear Ian, why there has never been FN1910 and FN1922 review on your esteemed chanell? After all FN 1910 was the gun that started WWI so it deserves its own video. 🙂😁😎
What advantages does having the fast (600 rpm) full auto and slow full auto (350 rpm) settings give compared to having one full auto setting (for example 550 rpm) and semi auto setting?
Ammo conservation. It's magazine fed and those go dry quickly. Light machine guns of the day also were used for anti air applications. You would want a higher cyclical rate against aircraft. For a light machine gun against infantry a slower rate of fire was more desirable. Semi in a light machine gun is also kind of useless, that is what rifleman are for.
@@hendriktonisson2915 I am aware of that, and agree with you, that they aren't too fast, but your question was on this gun and the possible idea behind the rpm settings. So I gave you an answer that probably sums up the idea behind it.
@@kevinoliver3083 you do remember there's a little thing called the Great Depression? Not to mention a general World trend towards disarmament during the era. So spending on a squad automatic that you already have a large inventory of? Not a generally high priority when a infantry rifle change was the main focus. And the Garand was not adopted till 1936.
Development of what became the M1918A2 began in 1938. By which time the Depression was easing. Colt's prototypes had the pistol grip and FN's proven rate reduction mechanism. But Ordnance ordered them deleted in 1939 because of NIH syndrome.
@@WALTERBROADDUSIf economy was the main motivation then surplusing all the 1917 Enfields, spending a whole lot of money developing a semi auto rifle, neglecting squad level automatic weapons and buying a horrifically expensive submachine gun seems rather strange. In the end I suspect it's a combination of the cult of the rifleman (which IMO has done more harm than good to this country) and NIH syndrome.
After watching you disassemble the B.A.R. and talk about how the U.S. version was harder. I have greater respect for my father. He carried a B.A.R. during world War two in France. He never mentioned how hard it was to maintain.
Im sure if its all you know then its not an issue. We have it easy being able to look at all the designs years after the fact
I would love to see Ian going through all the Swedish versions of the BAR. They even made one that was belt-fed.
That sounds awesome I never knew that
Kulsprutegevär m/1937 Bandmatat. 6.5x55@@JosephShemelewski
@@HasturT Cool thanks
Ah, the missing link between the BAR and MAG!
@@hailexiao2770 It looks nuts based on the pictures I've seen lol I can see why it was never officially adopted
The addition of a pistol grip really changes to operation of the BAR.
I’ll never tire of BAR variant content. What a fantastic video to wake up to, thanks my guy
I agree.
BAR is BEST.
It’s really interesting to me how similar to the mag-58 or m240 series the bolt, gas plug and piston are. At a glance you could be forgiven for thinking they came from a 240. It’s neat that FN looked at those designs and went “if it ain’t broke…”
Especially when you turn the BAR upside down.
I think the funniest description I ever heard of the MAG/240 was "upside down beltfed BAR"
I can’t help but admire the design and engineering of some of these old firearms. The tech that went into them was truly revolutionary at the time
The US’ refusal to adopt a rifle with a pistol grip until well into vietnam is baffling to me.
Try 500 years of firearms stock design....
Rifles without grips look a lot more aesthetically pleasing, but I doubt that is the reason lol!
Fudds: holding back US firearms procurement since 1889.
@@alm5992 You'd be surprised...
The whole M14 project has a lot problems besides no pistol grip.
As far as the BAR, I think the mag release is more a significant upgrade than the pistol grip. Just a personal opinion
Ha! I bought this gun at the Morphy auction. It's badass.
Congratulations on a fine example of the BAR, I wish you many years of pleasure owning it.
Jealous.
What's going on with that chunk of metal that "ripped off" the receiver? Any issues? Repairs?
I have to say FN made the BAR practical. And it looks awesome
Blaster from another age, all the curves, bevels and dovetails make it look like like an artisan built piece. Even the bluing on an old gun still holds up because sections were highly polished.
The rate reduction system seems overly complicated. I am assuming modifications to the bolt or recoil spring were not practical for some reason. I wonder how robust that rack and pinion system is.
Strangely enough the Belgians also did the same for the Chauchat.
If you want to see FN making the BAR practical, this is only the start. The Mle D was a vast improvement.
I know a lot of things are better than this but man I love this aesthetic of the BAR
The "rate-reduction" feature of the FN Model 30, is very cool
The bolt, bolt carrier, piston and gas plug look very similar to those from the FN MAG. Very cool to see the lineage
I hereby declare this the "Chocolate BAR".
Because it is sweet. And, y'know, Belgian.
As a Belgian, I'll allow it.
My uncle Art was the hunter in family (his stories of hunting for the mess hall with a M1 carbine while on occupation duty in Germany were classics). He had been an infantryman late 44-45 on the Western Front. He told me once, that after Bulge they got some strange looking BAR's with pistol grips and finned barrels to give two guns to a squad. As I got to know firearms better, I doubted his story - maybe just a mistaken memory of 30 years before. Then I discovered the Model 30. Did FN have some 30-06 Model 30's in stock that had sat in a warehouse since 1940? Did it make new barrels or rechamber existing Model 30's in other calibers? How did the US Army get ahold of them? Mysteries we'll almost surely never know the answer to.
I might have answers. Luxembourg used 30-06 as their standard cartridge, they were probably FN-D's. The Battle of the Bulge was fought in this area.
My stepfather had a BAR-D in Canada. It had been converted to single shot by cutting off the gas piston, and welding the gas system and bbl latch. A travesty I know but kept it from the cutters torch, until it was consumed in a Fire
Did this fire occur during a "boating accident"? 😉
Actually, it sounds kinda cool...
I met a WW2 vet who said they made you clean BARs as discipline for messing up, kinda like peeling potatoes.
I really like that the Hi Power designer, that Belgian with the funny name doesn’t get the respect he deserves for that LEGENDARY 9mm pistol.
Mr God Given Saive.
Also responsible for the FAL and the initial work on the MAG.
Mr. Saivé really deserves more props than he does. He sort of gets lost a little bit in the great firearms designer mix.
I have two. One is a pre 1939 model with a slot for a holster stock (which I don't have and don't want, thank you) and the other is 1976 build with a beautiful bluing job, walnut grips and target sights as I shooting competitively back then. As I was living on post, I kept it in the company arms room. Apparently, the armorer had never seen anything but parkerized M1911A1's, fell in love with it and showed it to the First Sergeant. So I was greeted one morning with, "That's quite a pistol you have, El Tee." I just grinned, "It sure is, Top"
It's always a good day when Ian uploads Belgian weapons.
As a Belgian, I have to agree.
Belgian Assault Rifle
😂😂😂
Oh, now we know it's really Belgian Armalite Rifle 😊
the A in BAR stands for Automatic btw@@dashingdave2665
Belgian Belgian Assault Rifle Assault Rifle.
@@dembro27
Ngl gun's kinda sus... Doesnt read BELGIQUE BELGIQUE BELGIQUE anywhere.. propably a fake.
One of the best versions of the BAR in my opinion.
I find it really cool that you can look at the swapping of parts on the gas piston/plug and see how it is incrementally becoming closer to the M240/FN Mag gas system, which uses the same bolt and piston system
over a century of history from the original BAR to the Lima variant, and not a whole ton has changed internally
You are a such a blessing Ian. I am making a video game featuring rare older fire arms and every time I think of something I would like to add, you do a full breakdown of it. Thank you so much.
We still use these beauty even today in 30-06 caliber, mainly by our Navy (mostly by ship crew, sailor and naval base personel). FN D just like the Madsen can serve really well for decades
I mean if it aint broke. Seriously though I'm sure there are plenty of older rifles that can still be quite viable in modern situations. Even if they aren't top of the line.
@@robosoldier11their biggest issue is the inability to add modern optics/force multipliers
@@Joe-hz1nw The model D would be even nicer with a pic rail and a free floating handguard rail
@@Joe-hz1nwNo biggies,I hate picatinny regardless their practicality
What nation?
I love the BAR. Any video with a BAR in it instantly gets a like
The craftsmanship on interwar guns is so pretty. Nice machining gorgeous finish
My father was a BAR man in the 101st as they were converting to the M14 from the Garand.
So did all the BAR men get M60s?
@@tomhenry897 Interesting. I would've thought the men who had M1 Garands got M14s and BAR men M60s. So were the BARs replaced by the standard M14s or a special LMG version with bipod and heavy barrel?
@@hendriktonisson2915pretty much, nomenclature M15, short lived obviously. If you ever played CoD black ops, and saw the M14 and said that looks wrong, that's because it was modeled after the M15.
Edit: did a double check, apparently no M15s were actually built, they just used M14E2s/M14A1s. Ian did a video about it like 8 years ago
The Madsen he covered the other day was like a Rube Goldberg but the BAR isn't exactly simple either.
True when I was a freshman in Army ROTC 1970-71 we still had some to familiarize with as some low priority units still had them. Complicated to field strip with lots of little parts to get lost. Not a fun time in the field.
Dude, totally. I'd rather service an antique swiss chronometer than the Madsen.
Love the FN BARS, god they look so well made for early LMGs
Thanks, Ian. Hope you have a great Thanksgiving
4:50 ah yes. I believe the technical term is ‘the shoulder thingy that goes up’
Some of the Chinese KMT 1933-39 contract of these have been seen with the Japanese triangle 'captured re-issue' mark. It's always amazing to think of the variety of people who used guns of a particular iconic origin!
The main reason I appreciate Ian is his correct pronunciation of "height".
We pronounce the T in trente because there is an E after the T, otherwise it would be silent indeed !
Good work dude, your pronunciation is starting to be outstanding
FN and Browning, name a more iconic duo.
Un magnifique fusil-mitrailleur modèle trente belge!
I wonder what happened to all the tooling for the FN30 when WW2 started. You didn't see any German manufactured BARs, implying the tooling wasn't available to them. The Germans were quite good at taking over factories and continuing production for their own forces. Did the Germans just not appreciate the weapon when they conquered Belgium, or was the tooling destroyed?
I don't think the Wehrmacht were interested in the BAR, or in the Browning 1917.
They used the 7.92x57mm guns they captured in Poland. But didn't continue production of either weapon in during their Occupations of Belgium and Poland.
Apart from pistols, FN was used to make components for German gunmakers, including Walther. And also military motorcycle/sidecar combinations.
They had stuff like the fg-42 to use.
My guess is that most of FNs technical and management staff fled to the UK, so the Germans couldn't make good use of the tooling. The Reich was already short one both, and you can't just lapanka some Poles to crank out BARs.
@@kevinoliver3083they were when they were used against them....
@@kenneth9874 Repeat please.
I don't know exactly why, but there is something so appealing about this gun, i felt very similar for the M1907 as well
Might be called "Browning Charm", as a diagnosed phenomenon, i am not sure
The first Belgian BAR is better than all the BAR USA used inWWl, WWll, Korea War and so...
Nah, not bad for a copy of a great American design though
Nope
I remember going through Tanker OSUT and working on the M2 and M240. Any time we had a pin or, especially, a detent to pull to a specific point to see in a hole in the receiver or frame our Drill Sergeant would say, "You got to see the titty in the window." It was a different time.
What a nightmare to strip.
Don't believe that I could ever do that blind-folded.
Unlike a Bren of similar vintage. Czech mate!
Bren? You might as well have a grease gun.
@@kenneth9874 What a silly comment.
@@MarvinCZ have you ever fired one?
@@kenneth9874 I fired a ZB-26 but even if I didn't, comparing a Bren to a Grease gun is so stupid, anyone who knows anything about those guns is facepalming.
@@MarvinCZ they're both cheap and simple and they both work ....
I prefer to refer to the BAR as Barely Any Rounds. All that metal and the bastard is out of hurty bits after a couple of controlled bursts of fire.
No one cares what you think
It's even got the shoulder thing that goes up.
I really like that magazine release.
If Dieudonné Saive was American, he would be right up there with John Browning and Eugene Stoner as the most famous gun designers.
In the rest of the world he is "right up there "
Dieudonné Saive IS right up there with John Browning. Because John Browning said so.
I always say he was Browning's disciple.
Great story as always!
Some of these popped up in the Spanish Civil War (or at least some BAR version with pistol grip).
Moustache
Great Stuff 💯 Thank you Ian 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥
Is it just me, or does it seem really crazy to include a rate reducer that works by making it harder for the bolt to return forward and go fully into battery through just pure friction from having to push a lever out of the way? That seems like it would be inviting malfunctions.
Good explanation mccolins
Such a good looking gun
I would assume the gun is in the German 8mm. That is what the Polish were using along with many other countries.
Excellent Ian. Simple pronunciation tip: Saive's name is pronounced as if it were spelled SEV in English. Also, in "fusil", the L is silent.
The Flemish BAR is vastly superior in all respects to this clearly Wallonian BAR. 😅
@@brianferguson7840 Thems fightin words boy!!!!
@@brianferguson7840messin with the pomme frites - ono you dit-nt!This is the third rail issue for any nation to not go to. wrt Belgium 😅
I admit I wasn't ready for the Fire Control Group to start quacking.
That’s a beautiful weapon…
I mean Ian’s mustache, though the BAR is a close second.
That's a big FN BAR
I love classic FN guns. They absolutely dominated military small arms for the past 100 years.
Truth.
That would be John Browning
I wonder what the best bipods of the '20s and '30s was? Sort of 'the bipod to rate against'.
🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷 DESDE ARGENTINA BUENOS AIRES, SALUDOS.A MORPHY muy buenos los vídeos siempre los veo son muy bien esplicado le mando un abrazo 👍👍🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷
Wouldn't want to take that apart on a freezing rainy January night in the pitch dark.
You should try to tie in war / hero stories that used the firearms you talking about if possible when applicable. Great video
Sounds like a new channel is needed. 😊
He rarely does battle history unless it's a specific firearm used by an individual. His channel is largely the broad history of firearms from a technical, technological, and logistical viewpoint.
I didn't scan through all the comments so apologies if somebody else already covered it but... while the updated mag release does look nice... form a pure military / law enforcement perspective... I like the original button mag release as, with proper training, I think one is just as fast as the other and, to me, I would be concerned about unintentional mag drops with the sliding release... e.g. it gets snagged on something or in "the heat of battle, the user getting "excited" and accidentally grabs the release instead of the trigger 😮
Would this be the model that the polish postal workers used to defend their post office at the start of WW2 ?
You just watched The Fat Electrician's video didn't you.
No, FN developed the M1930 after the Poles had adopted their version of BAR.
Most Browning wz 1928 guns were made in Poland, under licence. With only the initial batch of Colt made guns being bought from FN.
I call for the Ian drinking game (take a swig even time he tries french )😜
Take a shot for every “but I digress…”
Can someone with better editing skills than me put together a super cut of the o loving pronunciation of Dieudonné Saive.
It seems to me that magazine release could be a problem in brush or when going prone. More likely to lose the magazine than inside the trigger guard.
E Gads! I had not seen a BAR striped. No wonder they were so expensive!
A BAR with a pistol grip should’ve been what the US adopted for use as a battle rifle in the 1950s instead of the M14.
The BAR was 18 or so pounds and the fbi version was 16 pounds. A lot of weight for an average soldier to carry around. The m14 itself was around 9llb. Imagine if they made the fbi version in 7.62 x 39 or in the kurtz round. They could have had the fn fal but the ordinance board would not allow it.
After watching this breakdown, I have to say despite the massive amount of machining, the bren gun is better. I can't imagine having to field strip in austere conditions
To be fair on the BAR it was 20 years earlier than the Bren but yeah - Bren hands down.
That's a really nice rifle.
I'm curious what the absolute unit of an anti tank rifle behind him is, is that one of the russian 14.7mm's or a 20mm cannon?
Boys anti tank rifle I think.
Very nice.
Very cool
Firearms made from milled steel forgings have a character that stamped gins just can't match.
BAR: Big Ass Rifle!
Im from belgium ^^ nice looking gun
Ideal for vaporising GIs in Enlisted
early US Army org charts show the BAR used in the AA role. This changed quickly when the US entered the war.
If you can do a video about the Swedish Kg m/1937: modified version of m/1921, with quick-detachable barrel.
I had the opportunity in 94 to buy an original select fire BAR for 1700 plus 200 for the class 3 tax. I turned it down. If any of you invent a time machine I can go back and punch myself in the face.
The bar from Kelly’s heroes.
This gun has the real life "fuller auto" lmao
Speaking of FN, and you did the teaser video of “The Most Expensive MG Ever Sold”… all I want for Christmas is the FN Minimi formal history and mechanics episode and it’s coming soon on almost definitely Christmas of this year 2023.
I'll take an FN-MAG!
Technically the Gas System is an Internal Cylinder with an External Piston...
I guess you can say the BAR was set high for bAT variants.
Dear Ian, why there has never been FN1910 and FN1922 review on your esteemed chanell? After all FN 1910 was the gun that started WWI so it deserves its own video. 🙂😁😎
Cool guns indeed. In Belgium, you can find them for dirt cheap in most gun shops. FN made A LOT of them.
This is what the US should have adopted but while keeping the aperture sight.
Belgian's Awesome Rifle
The BAR drawn with a crayon
Some dummy ammo with various comparisons and useable empty cases would really be nice...x
Knowing my luck, I'd hit the magazine release instead of the trigger at the worst possible moment in combat.
Wait… somebody got workable and usable technical data from Colt?
The best BAR
Isn't it funny that the other nations had better bar variants in their military than the usa which only used colt monitor rifle in the FBI I think
That's what happens when you try to think...
What advantages does having the fast (600 rpm) full auto and slow full auto (350 rpm) settings give compared to having one full auto setting (for example 550 rpm) and semi auto setting?
In my opinion, none. I think the idea was to allow more continuous covering/harrassing fire at a slower rate that would conserve ammunition.
Ammo conservation. It's magazine fed and those go dry quickly. Light machine guns of the day also were used for anti air applications. You would want a higher cyclical rate against aircraft. For a light machine gun against infantry a slower rate of fire was more desirable. Semi in a light machine gun is also kind of useless, that is what rifleman are for.
@@ForgottenWeapons I see. Thank You for the answer!
@@onelonecelt9168 The ZB26 and Bren LMGs had a rate fire of about 500-550 rpm and these were not considered to have too fast rate of fire.
@@hendriktonisson2915 I am aware of that, and agree with you, that they aren't too fast, but your question was on this gun and the possible idea behind the rpm settings. So I gave you an answer that probably sums up the idea behind it.
Funfact: Dieudonné Saive was rumored to design cars also,
FN did manufacture all sorts of vehicles, so, that wouldn't be very surprising.
Anyone know how to get in touch with Ian? I have an old revolver I'd love to learn more about. Reason to believe it may have been a civil war piece
I wonder why I haven't heard of a bar with a shorter barrel and overall lighter. Could have been an early battle rifle, can anyone tell me?
Colt Monitor.
thanks@@skepticalbadger
Still can’t believe the US didn’t have these
The intransigence of the US Ordnance Department was legendary.
@@kevinoliver3083 you do remember there's a little thing called the Great Depression? Not to mention a general World trend towards disarmament during the era. So spending on a squad automatic that you already have a large inventory of? Not a generally high priority when a infantry rifle change was the main focus. And the Garand was not adopted till 1936.
Development of what became the M1918A2 began in 1938. By which time the Depression was easing.
Colt's prototypes had the pistol grip and FN's proven rate reduction mechanism. But Ordnance ordered them deleted in 1939 because of NIH syndrome.
@@WALTERBROADDUSIf economy was the main motivation then surplusing all the 1917 Enfields, spending a whole lot of money developing a semi auto rifle, neglecting squad level automatic weapons and buying a horrifically expensive submachine gun seems rather strange.
In the end I suspect it's a combination of the cult of the rifleman (which IMO has done more harm than good to this country) and NIH syndrome.
the BAR is just cool 😎 👌!it's heavy, It's an antique but I still like it ! I think the pistol grip would be helpful in controlling this beast.
Can u do more Croatia?