LOA= limit of advance EPW team= Enemy prisoner of war (they check for explosive or any traps that could hurt the squad). ACE report= Ammo, Casualties, and equipment. (Check to see if any squad member is running out of ammo, and/or check if they are hurt, and/or check and see if their equipment is working properly
It has been cleared for public release, you can see the drill in even more detail by purchasing the manual in any army/navy shop or googling and getting it for free online. If it was an OPSEC violation then it wouldn't be accessible, that being said, check out ARTEP 7-8 drill, on the front cover it states, "DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION--Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited" Don't worry bout what the enemy has, they've had access to this info with no trouble for years.
we were supposed to do a squad attack scenario for our nic. problem was, we were so backed up on training due to 'snow days' that we got quickly briefed on what to do that day and hadnt ever practiced it. so afterwards, we got to spend a couple extra fun filled hours with our very pissed off ds unfucking ourselves cause we sucked lol. once you know what your doing though, this is one of the most fun parts of bct
These tactics have been used by every element since the beginning of time... No great mystery... There are elements to our success that is classified and not talked about.
If they hadn't recived their emergency resup why then demo the 762.39 & the AK-47's . I would assign one of the two rifle,s to each fire team and distribute the ammo evenly . Untill resupply has been completed . Both teams being well are that each are in possession of the enemy rounds . And aware of one another's position.
"Prepare to copy" is bad radio procedure and should never be heard over the radio. The RTO should always be prepared to receive traffic. Excess radio traffic only increases the time it takes to send a message and increases the senders electromagnetic signature exposing them to a greater chance of being located by radio direction finding.
While you are absolutely correct about the RTO being prepared to receive traffic, I've always understood "prepare to copy" as a courtesy notification that the information to follow is something that the recipient is probably going to have to write down, and is therefore short for "prepare to copy this down (possibly word-for-word)".
+jfk767 The RTO should always be prepared to copy is not realistic. He very often may be involved in movement, under fire, or engaging himself. He may be monitoring multiple nets or engages in other communications not always via a radio.
+GOON SiX If he isn't prepared to copy he either won't answer your call, will answer with "stand by" or can always use proper radio procedure like "say again" or "say again all after (whatever)". People dumb enough to throw out extra and extraneous shit like "prepare to copy" or "how copy" do nothing but make it easier for me, a signals intelligence guy, to find you and pinpoint you due to your poor radio procedure. I had great success in the field against the people who used such shoddy and unprofessional comms habits. It was much harder to pinpoint competent people. Your choice, your life. And the lives of your team.
+jfk767 Using the logic in your first comment there shouldn't be a need for "say again". He should always be prepared to copy........ I respect your experience but my experience still says it isn't realistic for a boots on the ground RTO to be prepared to copy. When your in contact the enemy already knows your position, I could care less about a signals guy pinpointing me.I never once saw an RTO, PL, or anyone ready to copy. If your in a TOC or something similar then I agree there is no excuse.
+GOON SiX , your claim is a bit absurd. I guess in your world there are never any coms issues, natural or man made interference, loud noises on either end of the conversation, sending RTO speaking faster than the receiving RTO can write, etc.. Like I said, if the RTO isn't ready to receive traffic they will be telling the sending unit when they respond. Unless they are completely incompetent in which case you have bigger problems. Also, in the cases you mentioned there are only few instances where messages would need to be copied verbatim. Most radio traffic can be passed verbally without need for an exact transcript. Again, you gain nothing by saying things such as "prepare to copy" in fact you waste time.
This is a video from Fort Benning channel on Vimeo, this belongs to the Rangers. And you have the audacity to upload it here as it was yours? I wander what this will do to the relations of the national guard and the Rangers. At the very least, do the right thing and give Fort Benning´s guys credit for their hard work.
No offense, but all this radio sounds like a waste of time if your soldiers are experienced, can't you just tell your RO to report in, as you tell your TL's to have a hold and flank, then simply order the flanking squad to hold position while the pinning squad moves forward to hold the flanks, tell a TL to grab a rifleman and dispatch any intelligence, equipment and survivors and to take counts of equipment or casualties? I'm not trained or have been in training or experience, but what I watched seems like a lot of bureaucracy or a controlled training situation rather than an actual fire situation, you're not going to have both squads fall back to pick up their shit while your ass is hanging open number one. Number two, that is a lot of rounds being expended for two men, where a DM can simply take them out with, depending on accuracy of the man, in two shots. Or a properly placed grenade from the GR would be exactly what was needed for a forward observation team, not to mention you want to dispatch them fast if they do actually have a radio. Watching it again, I mean you can just order the guy's checking if the enemies are still alive to check their shit after they've made sure there is no activity behind the platoon. The only thing the PL should be calling in in my mind is the after action. If I'm wrong or misinterpreted something, let me know.
+Erreul One, it is important to understand that this is a template to be used, adjusted, or added to if needed according to different situations. It rarely ever plays out exactly like this. But mastering it, covering all these possibilites is extremely important. Two, all this communication is extremely important. However, in real situations it is done a lot more quickly and condensed. Third, The amount of rounds being expended is the most important part of the battle drill, it is crucial to its success. In real life Machine-Guns win the fight, not DMs. They more importantly suppress areas where you may not be able to see the enemy but from the enemies' perspective causes them to not want to peak out (thus minimizing their chance of spotting the assaulting element's approach.
Get off the X!!!!. by the time they finished their long drawn out actions on the OBJ, they would have been smoked by enemy counter battery on their lost LP/OP.
@@mr3839 Yeah really boils down to the contexts do you know there is an enemy ahead, do you not, are you looking for something or someone. How sure are you that someone is there etc.
LOA= limit of advance
EPW team= Enemy prisoner of war (they check for explosive or any traps that could hurt the squad).
ACE report= Ammo, Casualties, and equipment. (Check to see if any squad member is running out of ammo, and/or check if they are hurt, and/or check and see if their equipment is working properly
It has been cleared for public release, you can see the drill in even more detail by purchasing the manual in any army/navy shop or googling and getting it for free online. If it was an OPSEC violation then it wouldn't be accessible, that being said, check out ARTEP 7-8 drill, on the front cover it states, "DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION--Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited" Don't worry bout what the enemy has, they've had access to this info with no trouble for years.
Thank you. This channel has common sense.
Anthor tatice send me I am Nepal army
we were supposed to do a squad attack scenario for our nic. problem was, we were so backed up on training due to 'snow days' that we got quickly briefed on what to do that day and hadnt ever practiced it. so afterwards, we got to spend a couple extra fun filled hours with our very pissed off ds unfucking ourselves cause we sucked lol. once you know what your doing though, this is one of the most fun parts of bct
Gotta love how we post our training on social media.
#OPSEC #OPSEC #OPSEC
This is unclassified material. The enemy has easy access to this and they still can't stop this squad movement. It's that effective.
These tactics have been used by every element since the beginning of time... No great mystery... There are elements to our success that is classified and not talked about.
Haha love these vids, thanks for uploading
If they hadn't recived their emergency resup why then demo the 762.39 & the AK-47's . I would assign one of the two rifle,s to each fire team and distribute the ammo evenly . Untill resupply has been completed . Both teams being well are that each are in possession of the enemy rounds . And aware of one another's position.
lol
Looks like VBS2 (virtual battlespace 2), a simulation engine based on the ARMA engine.
well done, very imformative
is this the Version of arma only the military is allowed to use?
yes and no, is called vbs 8 or something like that you can buy it at the great consumer value price of $500.
Where could i download this video to show in a presentation
Distance, direction, description
Dont just say two enemy, say two enemy in the open or two enemy on the high ground etc etc
Contact, man, 500m!
2: target - man? 450m!
Mates i am from Ukraine so its hard to me to understand some terms. Help me please.
LOA-?
Johnson your black-
RCM(combat medic?)-
AG?
Limit of advance #freeUkraine
Limit of advance
He’s telling a teammate he’s watching his back
Rifle/compass man
Automatic Gunner
"Prepare to copy" is bad radio procedure and should never be heard over the radio. The RTO should always be prepared to receive traffic. Excess radio traffic only increases the time it takes to send a message and increases the senders electromagnetic signature exposing them to a greater chance of being located by radio direction finding.
While you are absolutely correct about the RTO being prepared to receive traffic, I've always understood "prepare to copy" as a courtesy notification that the information to follow is something that the recipient is probably going to have to write down, and is therefore short for "prepare to copy this down (possibly word-for-word)".
+jfk767 The RTO should always be prepared to copy is not realistic. He very often may be involved in movement, under fire, or engaging himself. He may be monitoring multiple nets or engages in other communications not always via a radio.
+GOON SiX If he isn't prepared to copy he either won't answer your call, will answer with "stand by" or can always use proper radio procedure like "say again" or "say again all after (whatever)". People dumb enough to throw out extra and extraneous shit like "prepare to copy" or "how copy" do nothing but make it easier for me, a signals intelligence guy, to find you and pinpoint you due to your poor radio procedure. I had great success in the field against the people who used such shoddy and unprofessional comms habits. It was much harder to pinpoint competent people. Your choice, your life. And the lives of your team.
+jfk767 Using the logic in your first comment there shouldn't be a need for "say again". He should always be prepared to copy........ I respect your experience but my experience still says it isn't realistic for a boots on the ground RTO to be prepared to copy. When your in contact the enemy already knows your position, I could care less about a signals guy pinpointing me.I never once saw an RTO, PL, or anyone ready to copy. If your in a TOC or something similar then I agree there is no excuse.
+GOON SiX , your claim is a bit absurd. I guess in your world there are never any coms issues, natural or man made interference, loud noises on either end of the conversation, sending RTO speaking faster than the receiving RTO can write, etc.. Like I said, if the RTO isn't ready to receive traffic they will be telling the sending unit when they respond. Unless they are completely incompetent in which case you have bigger problems. Also, in the cases you mentioned there are only few instances where messages would need to be copied verbatim. Most radio traffic can be passed verbally without need for an exact transcript. Again, you gain nothing by saying things such as "prepare to copy" in fact you waste time.
This reminds me of civil war armies using revolutionary war tactics. Who are u gonna fight today using these tactics in this terrain?
This is maneuver warfare, hasn’t changed since WW2
i got that game!
There are a few things i would change in this tbh.
This is primitive shit, army dont actually do this shit anymore.
Deadliest man on the battlefield is the one who has a map and can read a protractor
-Smith, you are black, you take the enemy on the right!
-Is it cause i am BLACK?!
5:30 epic loot
This is a video from Fort Benning channel on Vimeo, this belongs to the Rangers. And you have the audacity to upload it here as it was yours? I wander what this will do to the relations of the national guard and the Rangers. At the very least, do the right thing and give Fort Benning´s guys credit for their hard work.
Go play some video games. Hit me up when you actually understand the Army.
where can i download this for rotc?
No offense, but all this radio sounds like a waste of time if your soldiers are experienced, can't you just tell your RO to report in, as you tell your TL's to have a hold and flank, then simply order the flanking squad to hold position while the pinning squad moves forward to hold the flanks, tell a TL to grab a rifleman and dispatch any intelligence, equipment and survivors and to take counts of equipment or casualties? I'm not trained or have been in training or experience, but what I watched seems like a lot of bureaucracy or a controlled training situation rather than an actual fire situation, you're not going to have both squads fall back to pick up their shit while your ass is hanging open number one. Number two, that is a lot of rounds being expended for two men, where a DM can simply take them out with, depending on accuracy of the man, in two shots. Or a properly placed grenade from the GR would be exactly what was needed for a forward observation team, not to mention you want to dispatch them fast if they do actually have a radio. Watching it again, I mean you can just order the guy's checking if the enemies are still alive to check their shit after they've made sure there is no activity behind the platoon. The only thing the PL should be calling in in my mind is the after action. If I'm wrong or misinterpreted something, let me know.
+Erreul One, it is important to understand that this is a template to be used, adjusted, or added to if needed according to different situations. It rarely ever plays out exactly like this. But mastering it, covering all these possibilites is extremely important. Two, all this communication is extremely important. However, in real situations it is done a lot more quickly and condensed. Third, The amount of rounds being expended is the most important part of the battle drill, it is crucial to its success. In real life Machine-Guns win the fight, not DMs. They more importantly suppress areas where you may not be able to see the enemy but from the enemies' perspective causes them to not want to peak out (thus minimizing their chance of spotting the assaulting element's approach.
GOON SiX Okay, that makes sense then.
Over all this was pretty lame, but it was somewhat entertaining for me at 01:49 hrs
To relieve the added boredom of college exam finals etc..
Bryan Calhoun Please... Jarheads would fuck it up without even trying.
Get off the X!!!!. by the time they finished their long drawn out actions on the OBJ, they would have been smoked by enemy counter battery on their lost LP/OP.
LOA: Line of Attack
Black/Gold: Callsigns
Not sure about the other two...
LOA = Limit of Advance -_-
This is react to contact not a squad attack!
be warned
Bruh all the battle drills are fundamentally the same. React to contact leads into squad attack or break contact.
@@mr3839 Yeah really boils down to the contexts do you know there is an enemy ahead, do you not, are you looking for something or someone. How sure are you that someone is there etc.
Of course it's fake, it's from VBS/ArmA. Thanks for informing the public that it is in fake VBS and not real life footage, Captain Obvious.
its special simulation "game" for army training and bla, bla, bla. :D
The 8 that disliked this must be pogs
fake