SSPX Episcopal Consecrations 1988

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024

Комментарии • 34

  • @beardown851
    @beardown851 4 месяца назад +2

    God Bless you Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop De Castro Mayer for your heroic actions 🙏

  • @auniversalwoman
    @auniversalwoman 2 года назад +6

    Wow thank you for posting this!

  • @karlfranciscoabellanosa5972
    @karlfranciscoabellanosa5972 4 месяца назад +2

    What’s that piece playing at 19:29?

  • @auniversalwoman
    @auniversalwoman 2 года назад +9

    Can you explain why their heads were bound? This is the first Episcopal consecration I've seen

    • @JacobSnell1998
      @JacobSnell1998 2 года назад +10

      In Catholicism, both the head and the hands are bound with linen wraps prior to anointing those body parts with chrism. If I remember correctly (it's been a long time) after the anointing of the head, they then sing the Veni Creator Spiritus as a prayer for wisdom for the Bishop(s)-elect.
      Hope that helps.

    • @auniversalwoman
      @auniversalwoman 2 года назад +1

      @@JacobSnell1998 I'm looking for the why? I understand the hand wraps when becoming a priest; consecrated hands that touch Our Lord. But why the head for bishops?

    • @JacobSnell1998
      @JacobSnell1998 2 года назад +6

      @@auniversalwoman The hand wraps had the same purpose. It had nothing to do with touching the bread and wine actually. They linen wrappings functioned similar to a coif or baptismal gown - they kept the chrism from dripping. The head wrap keeps the chrism from dripping to the floor or running down the face.

  • @Sancte_Benedicte
    @Sancte_Benedicte 7 месяцев назад +2

    Thank you Archbishop Lefebvre!

  • @julieoelker1865
    @julieoelker1865 10 месяцев назад +6

    Lefevre did not have permission from the Pope to do this, making it a schismatic act.

    • @landonshanerthebanjokid5906
      @landonshanerthebanjokid5906 9 месяцев назад +10

      He did though....the church was in a crisis (still is) an if he had not done what he had did. Things would probably be worse than what they are now. I have no doubt that once Rome returns to the faith that he will be proclaimed a saint. His own mother (who had the stigmata) said he would play a huge role in the church an would save it through the grace of God.

    • @AlanChisholm-nz7jq
      @AlanChisholm-nz7jq 8 месяцев назад

      If JPII were Pope, you would certainly be right. But he was a public heretic, which according to Church teaching, severs a man from the Church. One cannot be head of that body of which he is not even a member. JPII was not a true Pope. Archbishop Lefebvre's consecrations were schismatic, though only by intention (not in fact, because he was disobeying a true Pope).

    • @A._150
      @A._150 8 месяцев назад +4

      How could he possibly ask a heretic for permission😂

    • @Sancte_Benedicte
      @Sancte_Benedicte 7 месяцев назад +6

      That's not true. The 1983 code of canon law makes it very clear that a latae sententiae excommunication is not incurred on the consecrator or the consecrated if the person performing the consecrations believed it was out of necessity.

    • @beardown851
      @beardown851 4 месяца назад +4

      it was not a schismatic act he didn’t set up another jurisdiction and JP2 lied to lefebvre and tried to stall him out til he died Lefebvre did what he had to do

  • @republiccomando1645
    @republiccomando1645 Год назад +2

    The schism day