Starfield Has What Star Citizen Will Never Offer
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 сен 2024
- Starfield Has What Star Citizen Will Never Offer
Starfield is SOOOclose to release but for space game veterans there's a key aspect of the game that's been eluding them for years & Starfield has it. Star Citizen, Elite Dangerous, & No Man's Sky are great games, but they'll never be able to offer you this critical experience, like Starfield does.
Star Citizen Referral Code for 5,000 additional credits: STAR-BBRL-3W3S
or...
robertsspacein...
Music from Epidemic Sound
www.epidemicso...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
BawseWear
teespring.com/...
Voice Overs
www.fiverr.com...
▬▬▬▬
-The Commission Org
robertsspacein...
-Join the Fam
/ digthat
-Discord
/ discord
-Twitter
@digthat32
-Facebook
/ digthat32
-Wishlist
www.amazon.com...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Gaming News
Starfield
Starfield vs Star Citizen
Starfield vs Elite Dangerous
#starfield #digthat32 #starfieldhottea
This aged like milk.
How so?
@@DigThat32 💀
@@DigThat32 Because it turns out Starfield doesn’t have much to offer.
@Gritt999 Wait.. what? Of course it does. What are you doing.. commenting against the title with no context from the video?
There’s nothing like landing on a planet manually coming out of your ship and walking springs wherever who knows who you’ll run into. Star citizen all day
The stutters kill it for me and the ship shilling scam.
I agree man starfield has a finished product, star citizen may never have one. Starfield wins.
Starfield is also single player only and is not an open seamless world...lol
@@Flyinfool750 exactly what I'm trying to explain people... Also planets aren't full size, ships have no interiors and so on. Starfield is just a space themed game while Star citizen is an actual space game.
comment aged like unrefrigerated milk
Brah' ... thank you for a balanced and entertaining review of SC and Starfield. It's a good time to be a sci-fi geeking gamer 👋🏽👋🏽👋🏽👊🏽
You right about that broski
Star Citizen will never have X-Box or old tech or build a game just to sell games to the masses .That's why I back SC . Bill Gates will NEVER fund it .
Haven't seen ya face in a while bro. You out doin' James Bond missions IRL?
Both games scratch an itch. Will be enjoying both while waiting for Squadron 42 to bring that military space action into my life.
The problem is we need to wait another 10 years for sq42
@vashergaming It sure is!
Squadron 42 doesn't exist. Other than some basic cut screen stuff from many years ago - show me anything remotely recent, independently verified, that confirms the existence of SQ42?
@@JamesHartnelli cant show you bc it doesn’t exist
Starfield will have mods and a shit load of them. I could see the modding community making pretty much every feature SC has or has promised and 1000 more. But it isn’t multiple but I still play Skyrim, Oblivion, Fallout 3 and 4 to this day so space Skyrim sounds amazing.
Ya that's the thing, Special Edition still has a ridiculous player count for its age. I suspect Starfield will be another decade game like Skyrim
Cig are the modders for SC
SQ42 is gonna be the Starfield killer. The Starfield 3 killer when they both launch in 2035.
It will kill starfield as much as the dceu killed the mcu, lol.
Uhhmm, no. SQ42 looks like a linear story driven game. SF you go where you want, do what you want, build a base, customize your ship, hire crew and have 1000 planets to explore. In 12 years, SC doesn't even have 10% of that.
@@MoonHowlerGaming Congratulations on completely missing my point.
@@justalex4214 Starfield 3 in 20235, homie. I'm not saying it's gonna kill Starfield. It's a joke about how long development of SQ42 is taking.
Lol people commenting and not actually reading what you were saying
Im intersted in the ship builder, but I dont think they'll give us enough to do with them.
Most of the AAA studios try to take as much of the "space" out of their space games as they can.
Based on Bethesda's past, you'll likely wind up fast traveling everywhere.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm keeping my expectations low.
Got a like for the Buck Rodgers reference.
Eh I see they may have a mechanism to fast travel but I think traveling by ship will be the main solution of getting place to place. Also you I’m sure saw the mech they made. There will be plenty of creative ways to build ships. I’m sure ppl will start full RUclips channels dedicated to that or even how to build nice outposts. I wish they talked about the other space stuff you can role play as in game. I don’t think ppl realize how deep this game is. They have trading economy which is essential to any space game. They have mechanics to let you be a bounty hunter, space trucker (as said by some of bethesdas devs), pirate, explorer. Then there’s the factions and etc. There’s so much I hope the reviews really tell ppl what’s so big about SF.
Bahhahahahahahahahahahah NOOOT lmao starfield is a failure in many ways you cant even compare SC with SF, and comes not even close to Star Citizen. I had SF i dumped it, its NOT what i tought it would be at all, as promoted by Howard.
"Starfield has what Star citizen will never have" what? Successfully scam people and said people will defend the people scam them lmao. The game is good but beths lied about some of the more important aspect of the game
such as?
The only thing Starfield has that Star Citizen will never have is disappointment. 200 million on that garbage. Don't buy, get your money back if you have. 40$ for star citizen is an investment you'll never regret. Every month more mind blowing tech is added. If you can run the game you can't deny how insanely impressive their project is. Starfield is a straight up scam.
sure does... invisible boundaries; loading screens; zero space exploration; zero multiplayer; made-up pronouns...
shall I go on?
This should get a damn Grammy for how smooth this is. Dig That!!
Rrright on bawse!
Lol Star Citizen is gonna get so many new players and money from all the people disappointed that Starfield doesn't have many of the features of Star Citizen.
One more thing that StarField will have is mods. After a year or two in, the mods will be absolutely insane. Breathing new life into
this game for years.
This exactly! It will be current Skyrim modding ^ 10. And Mr. angry about the menu screen dev.. do not worry! Modders will fix it!
Imagine star ctizens mods lol
Wouldnt be ironic?
@@kungalexander829 Imagine star citizen mods bugging the fuck out and cashing lol
@@kungalexander829 I can imagine Star Citizen ships being made as mods in Starfield.
The fact we have so many planets will give people opportunity to create entire games within a game. That's what I'm waiting for. Heck they could do any sci Fi game they want including high fantasy on the lines of Skyrim on 1 planet. No body ever said the mid had to be space based science fiction.
Aged like milk
Lol this didn't age well. Starfield doesn't do any of the things that Star Citizen does.
you didnt watch the video at all
And i would like to add more importantly, Starfield will be finished when we get it....i know i know but starcitizen actually started pre production in 2010, so i'll give them the 2 years to acquire the gold bars for dev...so 11 years and still got more bugs than grandmas jam cellar.
At least SC allows you to have full control of your ship and actually feel like you are part of a future era
"Starfield Has What Star Citizen Will Never Offer" Is it a finished game?
I can reverse and say, star Citizen has something that Starfield will never have.. and that is loading no screens 😂 I really wanted to play this game, but the planetary loading screens killed it for me. Also no game that you play is Ever really technically finished. they all update in your living room and receive patches. people have to get over this idea that games are finished on the release.
@FuturisticallyMinded no loading screens is a meme. Go set your bed on microtech and wreck anywhere else. You catch a loading screen on your way back to the bed. They hide the loading through artificially inflated travel times. Streaming assets in and out on the fly is old hat.
@@CyborousI’ll take loading screens over insurance claim timers, elevators, and terrible tram systems.
@@poisonouslead85 Then why didn't Bethesda do it? Oh that's right they stated that it is to difficult to do, so they took a simple approach which is loading screens, hell there is even a loading screen to get into your ship.
@@rooster1012Actually they didn't do it because it was unnecessary. After flying from planet to space a few times it simply becomes a waist of time that I could be using elsewhere. A few seconds loading screen or a few minute flight into space, I'll take the loading screen.
Loool. So yeah, star citizen isnt that bad after all.
The worst part of SC is the other players. Sure there are couple of good guys out there but the lot of you just want to pirate and PVP, not go on an adventure or do any mining or anything. They are the players that just do the main quest line in an RPG and beat the game in 20 hours then complain there was nothing to do. So far, SC is only slightly less toxic than a GTA online lobby, but just like with that game, the players make it toxic. If we could have private servers or RP-esque servers for SC, I would never stop playing it. Unfortunately, I don't think that will be a possibility with server meshing, so all hope is lost there.
Yeah they want a Persistent World. So only one server. So yup very well might turn even more toxic which could hurt players trying to get into it. Plus I just think it’s a scam kinda. SF is SC but single player, which is what I’ve wanted.
Problem is, Starfield isn't even a space game 😂
SF is a game, SC is unfortunately a galaxy adventure simulator. The difference is on the word "simulator". People will need to realize like I did eventually that there is nothing stopping them from bloating SC to infinity. The concept is great and I still expect it to be done, however that means we will not be getting a GAME for a very very long time.
A game is about enjoyable mechanic loops. SC is busy plowing the huge land needed for the damn roller coaster.
"SC is unfortunately a single solar system adventure simulator." FTFY ;)
Yeah it does have one thing that Star Citizen doesn't have, it's called Load screen and fast travel simulator, this video has failed and didn't age well...
Even though it's a useless comment w/no relevance to the video, I neither like or dislike what have to say. I just kind of.. "nothing" it.
BUT.. regardless, I wanted express my gratitude for the engagement that commenting brings, which helps more people to see this vid. 🤗
Just want to say this is the first video I’ve seen of yours (I’m on the RUclips hype marathon of chain watching Starfield videos) and your commentary is very fresh, hilarious and entertaining. Felt like I needed a piece of toast for that buttery smooth delivery. Keep it up man, definitely subbed after seeing this upload.
Glad ya enjoyed it!
Do yourself a favor and find DigThat32’s cutlass black commercial. It was the first video recommended to me when I was considering which ship I should buy for Star Citizen. I have since upgraded but the original video still makes me chuckle every time I watch it.
What's that? Menu traveling?
👍 Well said sir, and well written, shot, and edited as well.
After 100+ hours in Starfield I have to say it doesn't have much to offer that I haven't already experienced elsewhere in a better form. I'm sad to say I'm rather disappointed by it. It may not have had many bugs on launch but it didn't have any heart or character either.
It isn't really fair to compare Starfield and Star Citizen to one another as they are vastly different games. Even SQ42 won't really compare well, seems like it'll be more like a COD campaign latched on to a Wing Commander spiritual sequel. I've got thousands of hours in Star Citizen and don't have much interest in SQ42.
Point topoint response:
I wish you liked it.
It's not a game vs game comparison...it's a "what's gratifying to gamers comparison"
My interest in Sq42 is similar. I'll be interested when it comes out, but right now it's an abstraction.
I played Star Citizen for close to 200 hours. When I play StarField I get bored and annoyed. I don't even explore. You land your ship and have to walk everywhere. In Star Citizen you can at least fly your ship on the planet. Everything that's good about Starfield is 1000x better in Star Citizen. Yea StarField has a campaign but Star Citizen has a community and economy. Your time playing the game is your own journey and campaign.
How'd you log your SC time?
A completed game? lol
Well star field will have less bugs for sure
After playing Starfield at gamescom... all I can say as a 10.5 year backer of Star Citizen. STARFIELD WILL KICK THE ZEITGIEST OUT OF STAR CITIZEN'S ASSS. Meaning... STAR CITIZEN is Irrelevant.
Star Citizen is a niche GRIND, developed at a snails pace, using a game engine that has water tech worse than vanilla SKYRIM. Star Citizen is also the proverbial prick tease, always pushing the next patch/build/ content, and delivering very little, the only time anyone comments on the current ALPHA, is when the shits hitting the fan. Starfield on the other hand offers everything and more from Day1. Its a game for the masses, on PC/Console/Handheld/Streaming, with modding thrown in for good measure.
Star Citizen is that black sheep of the family you have to mingle with at family functions, Starfield is the hot date you just can't get enough of. The exodus from Star Citizen will be biblical, Star Citizen has so little to offer........and im Concierge.
People say that the two games cannot be compared and they are NOT in competition.
But players have limited TIME and a few hours one one game is time not spent in the other game.
I have recently uninstalled a few games off my SSD to free up space for Starfield, including the Star Citizen launcher.
The two games are aimed at the same player base … obviously some people are right into MMOs, but by and large, fans of space sims will be attracted to both of them.
SC flight model is fantastic, but Starfield has it beaten in almost every other way … if you’re OK with single player/story driven games.
To be honest, I haven't thought about Star Citizen since the Starfield showcase. Star Citizen is simply not a "game" or even a "sim" at this time because it isn't finished enough and the structure isn't stable. There is no real foundation and the "game" is really a "playable while under construction" IP. I enjoyed it, but it has a long way to go before I can settle into it, so Starfield will be a great breath of fresh air to satisfy my space fix for the time being. Star Citizen will still be alive and won't get killed, but CIG needs to get things in order because the market and real life can easily change things.
Then again, maybe that has been their intent the whole time to bank millions. They got all of that crowd funding and drive ship sales, and they can simply slow roll everything as time passes by and people walk away......after they release Squadron 42 to add to the bank.
Starfield was never the Star Citizen killer. It's potentially the Squadron 42 killer. If SQ42 ever comes out, its now going to have to be at or exceed the scope of gameplay and story on offer with Starfield, and that is a TALL order.
“I digest” now I want a hamburger
I just tasted vegan spaghetti, so I do too!
I got crazy amounts of hours in skyrim and cyberpunk.
With starfield and phantom liberty I don't think I'll touch star citizen much for another 2 years.
I'm not comparing Starfield to StarCitizen. 2 very different games that have the same theme. Starfield just dosent interest me. Fallout 4 bored me to death, Never liked skyrim, I think for me it will be the same boring RPG where I cant just do my own thing.
There is a reason why the title screen is the top mod right now.
Bethesda did what it always does. They create a backbone for a game. Then they allow the modders to actually make it good.
This will be no different.
Starfield Has What Star Citizen Will Never Offer:
1. release date XD
2. content
3. mods
4. its a game not tech demo
5. reason to play
6. no pledge store/cash grab jpg and promises game-loop
They already have micro transactions planned to be in Starfield, so no escaping that.
@@rooster1012 good point, but it's not a core game-loop starting from dreams of delivery starting from 43£ to 1k£ + money coins rlc in PTU (paid test universe)
For gamers, community is a good time to wake up after BG3 eye-opening situation. I like SC but after a decade of "development" and promises on top of others I'm just fed up.
They just turned beautiful idea in to straight to community face money hungry machine. Greed will destroy this beautiful dream of a game.
I just found you and I love your voice and your writing is great, must sub. Thank you for the video.
whahahaha starfield what a joke xD
Completely agree, i plan on playing both as well
Star citizen scratches that itch for large scale player on player activity
While starfield seems like itll give me a more laid back game that I can pause progress abd take a break without having to log out
In SC for a mere $350 (others have spent 10's of thousands), and still have hope.
But in the mean time I'm going scratch that itch with SF.
+1 on the video,Thanks for your time
@7:01 Starfield is intent on delivering the things that Star Citizen can't, I'm guessing thats a finished released game.
Oh man, this is the first of your reviews I have seen and it had me laughing so much. The pacing, delivery and slick presentation really got my attention. Great stuff!
Big thanks!
@Dig Good looking playboy! I’m playing both these joints!! 😂
Neither is killing the other. They're both completely different approaches to sci-fi and I love them both. They aren't copying each other; they're just really good imaginings of sci-fi and I'm for it.
People really, really underestimate how much fun Star Citizen's seamlessness is BY ITSELF; not including activities. And it is only in Alpha; where everything is getting plug and played, pulled out, put back, reiterated, etc. It isn't even in Beta (though lots of critics seem to confuse the two; including community members).
People also really, really underestimate how much desire there is for a true sci-fi RPG in Starfield. Not Mass Effect; a third person shooter set in sci-fi themes, but a true, run around, ship flying, character exploring sci-fi RPG. What excites me about Starfield is that it looks (and the gameplay makes it feel) like it is actually sci-fi. It doesn't use the ship as just a hub for conversations, it doesn't use the character as just a 'relatable object' so you aren't staring at a ship's engines literally 24/7. All aspects of it are represented and I really crave that in a RPG for a change.
This is exactly how I feel about SF too. It’s literally THE game ppl from the 80s have dreamed of since watching the first Star Wars or Star Trek. And of course SC is giving us it too but in multiplayer. Both are sandboxes where you can do whatever. But for me SF is the finished product with a clear vision with its systems. Which are very deep and puts the sandbox on a huge scale just like SC. There’s literally no game like it out at all in the single player space realm. All the others are ship combat space sims. Or a cartoony one like NMS. No this is the first grounded space game sandbox being released, so exciting.
@@westheking12 I love NMS, but it isn't a RPG. I love SC, but it, too, isn't a RPG. SF is; and I've really been wanting a RPG that brings together the ship, the crew, and the universe into something playable rather than one of those and the rest is window dressing.
Everspace 2; GREAT RPG. AMAZEBALLS space combat. But you don't play as the character; you're the ship. The character is isolated to cutscenes; good ones, but cutscenes.
Freelancer; same as Everspace 2.
Mass Effect; RPG, play as the crew, ship was window dressing and a hub for conversations.
Star Ocean (in particular The 2nd Story as it was what I played the most); GREAT RPG. Sci-fi window dressing. No ship, no universe, just sci-fi in the sense of 'character from beyond the sky', and it was your tried and true save the kingdom concept.
Outer Worlds; FPS RPG, ship was a hub, universe were maps you zoned into. Great game, but same problem.
I love the seamlessness of Star Citizen, the players, dynamic never-know-whats-around-the-corner gameplay (even the bugs lol), but I don't want it ALL the time. I just want a good single-player universe RPG romp where all the sci-fi stuff is included instead of just genre + sci-fi themed levels/vfx/narrative.
That's why I'm excited for Starfield.
@@karsonkammerzell6955 Literally the best comment of what I’ve thought on Sci fi games too. Starfield is the first to add all the elements of great sci fi games and put it in one but as a single player sandbox rpg. Yup I’m super excited too.
Starfield has what Star Citizen will never offer...
... a release date
I think Starfield will help SQ42 and SC in a way that seems really counter intuitive.
People are gonna forget SC and SQ404 exist when Starfield drops and that's to CIG's benefit. They can stay out of the public eye until they have something major to deliver.
Even if CIG promises a their Hull C to Pyro and sq42, their servers will never agree and just keep slapping Chris Roberts to stop lying to the public. The servers are the handicap that can’t get close to accommodating their promises.
Not only that, Starfield is getting the millions of Bethesda fans interested in space games and once the Starfield hype runs out a little some of those new space fans will also start playing SC
@@BernardoPC117 I’d normally agree with you but mods are coming and have been announced already to be implemented with Bethesda’s blessing and possibly monetization for the mod authors. It’ll be just like how mods have kept the other Bethesda titles full of new life for years. I will gladly play SC when it’s out but I’m cautiously sitting back waiting to see how it plays out in the end. I just hope it’s not too little to late by the time SC gets wings IF it gets them fully fledged if you get my drift.
@@Modioman69 I get your point, I just finished my like 10th playthrough of Moded Skyrim, but that doesn't mean Skyrim is the only game I've played for 12 years. Personally I don't care about SC, even if they finish the game I don't think I'll play it because I don't like MMOs, but I have seen many comments on Starfield videos saying "I wish Starfield had multiplayer" and since Bethesda's player base is way bigger than SC's or any other space game, even if just a small percentage becomes interested in space games is going to help SC and every other game in the genre.
@@BernardoPC117 Gotcha, yea I hear you on that and it’ll be fun to see how this all ends up playing out. Either way as a space fan I’ve got hours of entertainment either way so I’m all good haha
You know what SC got that SF ain’t? Griefers.
@digthat32 this is really excellent writing and delivery. I enjoyed the information dense montage of ideas through the whole video.
Appreciated mayne!
This was an excellent way to put it. Star Citizen puts you on a semi-level playing field where you are just one person trying to make it out there. Starfield makes you the star of a movie so to speak. You are the main character and the center of the universe. Excellent video!
Salute!
Isn’t that what Star Citizen Squadron 42 is also like?
Man U backers are in such denial this is the true making of a cult lmao Starfield is actually way better and i was a backer but yea i can build ships and create outpost and build a crew that go with u on ur travels instead of star citizen where ur alone and it’s weird and boring and puts u to sleep this is what triple A games are for Chris Roberts is a total Wasteman and star citizen was yet another failed project that never came to fruition
Great video, dig your style. I have zero interest in Starfield, though. The hype confuses me. I didn't even think Skyrim was that great. Guess I'm just not an RPG guy.
Yea I respect your delivery of opinion. I’m on the hype train personally because I’m in love with RPGs and space/Sci-fi stuff. It’s okay to have no feelings sometimes it’s just not your cup of tea. I don’t like battle royals meanwhile the “majority” I say that loosely, seems to love it. But we’re all gamers at heart I love hearing what the masses think about different games vs how I’m feeling. Kinda gives you a “gaming temperature” of society in a way.
I game almost exclusively single player, so I've been looking forward to Starfield just as much as I *was* looking forward to Squadron 42. I'm still keeping an eye out for S42, but no longer have much hope that it will be what I want. I would like to be wrong about that.
If Start Screen Guy was just fishing for clicks and attention, mission accomplished. The Starfield screen gives me the same vibes as Skyrim & Fallout 3.
I feel the same. The space genre needed a single player game like this on a SC scale which I believe SF is. It’s literally SC but single player with a story but rpg mechanics, while SC is all skill no rpg mechanics. But both are sandboxes where you can do whatever you want in a space setting with multiple planets and cities. I’m not high on SC because of the sketchy way of their business model with the ships and also very slow and not realized vision and update to the game. I just can’t personally get excited but only from a far looking at others play on YT. But SF is exactly what I’ve been wanting since SC existed. It gives me everything I wanted with literally a dream game. Plus I’m more single player then multiplayer too. Cannot wait.
I did not think I could be more hyped for starfield than I was before watching this video, but boy was I wrong. Great video and commentary 🙌🏻
Ay I'm hyped w/ya!
You know what neither game will ever offer me? High speed robot powered war crimes. AC6, my body's ready!
I think it would be much easier to start out on rails and gradually expand the rail system than to have total freedom from the get go---in terms of development time. 😅
No Multiplayer, but that's fine. I will be playing SF until SC gets its Sh*t together.. (by that time, Starfield 2 will have come out, With multiplayer)
I'm waiting for SC ships to get modded in.
Exactly I’ll enjoy starfield while I wait and see if Star Citizen can deliver on its promises.
Its a shame some people think we need to pick sides or put one game down to uplift another. We should all just be happy we can experience a small taste of space exploration.
Facts
Seamless is going to be the tough part to go back from; not being able to freely run on and off our ships, having at least two loading screens (cockpit and exit ramp), goes to show that while SF is a new Beth game, it's still a traditional Beth game.
I’ve seen the leaked gameplay. Loading times seem very fast surprisingly. Also I believe the seamless transition is way overrated now. Plus again SF is not a sim like SC is. And NMS does it only because literally every thing around you is generated while you move. I hate seeing players say the seamless thing is a somehow deal breaker.
@@westheking12 I'm used to Beth loading screens, but each new generation of game, I hope they will be rid of them. Unfortunately not. Just been spoilt a bit by other games, with seamless interior/exterior transitions. Loading times are usually excellent on Beth games; superfast, at least until one starts adding mods, and more mods, and some mods for mods.
Way too much hype to live up to, it's not giving me the fizz at all.
Which game?
SC and SF fill two differnt space niches for me.. will be the same when open work star wars comes out... we need to stop fighting and start supporting these games, i lived through the space game dark days, im excited i made it to the rebirth.
"..the space game dark days.." Good point. We're at a pretty good place now.
@@DigThat32 dare i say... the space renaissance
Big thumbs up for the Peter Hamilton shout out! I'm almost $2K into Star Citizen, but I'll be able to PLAY Starfield in 7 days.
Insane-level world building in his books
@@DigThat32 Ywo days in and I've not fallen through the floor of my ship once 😝
loading screens?
One major thing for me that Starfield has that Star Citizen will never offer is I can play Starfield on my xbox.
That is not a plus ;)
not everyone has $1k+ to spend on a pc that can run starshitizen@@tommeegunn9318
Comparing a finished game to one in alpha…. Not to mention one is multiplayer so y woulndt u comepare sq42 so starfeild instead?
Et tu Tezzy? 😅
Nah, it's not a "one is better than the other" comparison at all. Did you watch??
If you holdin' onto some detailed info about Sq42 that nobody's aware of, I'm all in. As it is, there's really nothin' to report about Squadron, except that it's hogging up all the dev resources.
Not a comparative analysis mayne
A release date jumped into mind
Dig, not only are you my favorite DJ-voiced SC youtuber, but the eloquent wordsmithing you introduce is always a pleasure as well. Good comparo!
I appreciate it!
Honest to God, love this content, love the narration.
Definitely gained a new sub.
Thanks and welcome
So addressing the clickbaity title for a moment... a couple things.
Firstly, Starfield isn't in competition with Star Citizen... it's in competition with Squadron 42.
Now with that part out of the way... I think Starfield will have it's moment in the sun for all the reasons you outlined.
But it also suffers one huge limitation that you also mentioned. No atmospheric travel to off script locations and not even any ground vehicles.
That might take some of the shine off.
Squadron 42, because it will have the full map, and then some, won't have this limitation. Additionally (If what CIG says they are doing is true) Squadron 42 is character generation just as if you were rolling your attributes.
If you choose and follow through on the military path, you end that game with all the skills and reputation you acquired and then that, and even your military uniform and fighter... port over into Star Citizen allowing you to continue what you started.
Starfield, has no such follow on world. When you are done playing Starfield... you are done playing Starfield.
Great video though. A very balanced treatment of it. Keep up the good work.
"But I Digest"
A release date?
A release date
SF it will make everyone playing it if there is co-op in it, bc sometime you will just feel empty or alone or "bored" , if you have no one to share the feeling of mission or action with or talk with while doing the event together
"I'm buying what they both selling."
YEP - I couldn't have summed it up better myself.
Star Citizen and Starfield are completely different things. I like both and will play both. Star Citizen as they release more way overdue content and gameplay/features etc. And Starfield during the lulls during Star Citizen development which true needs to pickup speed AND get AAA GTA 6 level SQ42 out ASAP
The first thing that INSTANTLY came to mind after reading the title was "A game"
(EDIT) Before anyone gets butt hurt. It's a joke. SC is a sim, not really a game. And Starfield will have mods where I'm sure they will focus on sim and not gaming. So chill. (EDIT)
I think that fundamentally they are entirely different games that share a setting and the comparison need to stop or it’s only going to hurt StarField.
Just like Elite was fine until it started to get compared to Star Citizen constantly.
Even though fundamentally they are different games.
Now one is nearly completely dead and it ain’t star citizen with the massive amounts of funds pumped into the game.
On a side note i hope everyone remembers this is a Bethesda game and is tapering their expectations around that and not exclusively what Todd Howard promises you.
Long time Bethesda “no longer fans” have become very stand off from Bethesda for a reason. We’ve started to abandon their original games that made them the giants they are for a reason.
Fallout 4 to Fallout 76 sales went from over 10,000,000 copies to only 1,000,000 for a reason.
They’ve been gutting detail from their games for mass appeal for Y E A R S while still promising all that detail and expanse their games USED TO offer but no longer does.
The greats that ran the company and made the games they promise haven’t been with Bethesda for years.
The dumbing down of their own games happened at a shocking pace.
They have made it a trend to gut entire portions of games, mechanics, activities and NPCs and quest lines just to add ONE mechanic to a game.
SC and EDO suffer from the same problem .. they let you do what you want, how you want but give you no reason or purpose to do those things other than earn money to buy and upgrade ships. This only leads to boring, repetitive grinding. which is what SC is... At least EDI tries to have a narrative. This is why BG3 is so amazing, engaging and addictive and why Starfield will be too.
sc looks pretty n thats it...theres no story n nothing to do...we need a sp space rpg, but not another mass effect
Heh, I just realized that you've hit the nail on the head with Star Citizen's main problems and why a lot of people will find Starfield better: consequences. Starfield is all about them, they drive the game's story and your relationships with NPCs. On Star Citizen there are no consequences for anything and that's it's main problem. People grief because there are no consequences. People hate wipes because it forces everything you do to not matter, and so have no consequences. People cheese the game and get bored with it because there are no consequences. Every day is the last day of the world in Star Citizen.
Star Citizen has a lot of promises but very little to offer currently. Currently the "server meshing" is just a dream they failed to achieve. CIG is not doing magic and they are not smarter than other studios. They still have to prove that they can deliver half of their promises on a larger scale.
But what's even the point of having all the building accessible? How is that supposed to make the game more interesting?
Starfield is coming out in a few days and it's not trying to be SC, it's just trying to be fun to play while offering some freedom.
he is went all in rap god game presentor😄👍
anyway, i've seen all the trailers and the leaks about starfield and im not impressed,
starfield is low in camparison with starcitizen or no man sky, but this is no space sim so expect that.
no cars no mounts and no flying it makes sense cause the planet is not a planet, its limited in traveling, i wonder how space is.
Pete kinda lied about a tweet so i expect alot of misinterpretation from the hyped presentations, thinking about all the "lies" in the past.
"massive" map and single player dont mix and it feels like a prison, thats me.. not worth 100$ and because there are no online server i predict the game will be alot pirated
ok, but maibe you are into all that, lonely plays, boring long point and click dialogs,
long grinding for stuff and xp with that little voice in your head "hey its a singleplayer, you can hack a few levels noone will mind, just skip a few hours for that new gun"
the only reason ill buy it is for the story, i bet they have a good 40hour story.
my advice is take in mind is not a space sim, they lied alot, and dont PREORDER
I'll definitely try starfield, but Star citizen will remain my favourite, it's an actual space game as opposed to a space themed game like starfield, where the planets aren't even full size and you can't just fly around and explore, ships don't have interiors either and these two things are very important about space. The first thing that comes to mind when you mention the universe is how big it is, so planets need to be full size to really aid immersion, space between planets needs to be as seamless as possible, also take/landing. Another thing is your space craft, in every single space movie we've watched, the ship is a major factor, we see people walking around, engineering, med beys, sleeping quarters, laboratories, armoury etc. It's your home for the time being, not just a tool from a to b, being able to fit ground vehicles and smaller space craft in larger ships is amazing.
I love your idea of CITY GAMEPLAY (which I've been calling for, for FIVE YEARS now)... that's DigtThat32 it's what players want.
More Star Citizen players will play Starfield than Starfield players will play Star Citizen!!!!!! BET!!!
Start screen lazy and half-assed?
I just love it when some hack of a developer who maybe can design the best start screen ever with no game to show for all that glitz and shitz.
Reminds me of all those Nintendo and Genisis games from the past where the artwork on the packaging sold the game, and then you got pixel 8-bit game graphics. lol
Sadly Starfield is the last gasp of last-gen technology in all its glory which is loading screens all over the place, and the moon/planets have its limitations where you will hit the renowned "invisble walls".
That out of the way it will probably be a OK spacesim, not great, which I think Starcitizen will become the greatest spacesim this generation by far.
Star Citizen is still in development, has been since 1986. I like star citizen, I just hope it gets done done before I die. I am looking forward to Starfield for sure. Good balanced video
Starfield and Star Citizen aren't competitors. One is a single player game and the other is an MMO. Good thing the devs on SC haven't been pushing almost all of the money and a decade+ into a single player game with not much more than space battles and cutscenes.. oh wait..
Man if only Star Citizen had Cyberpunk 2077 NPCs behaviors (tailered to lore) it would be amazing. However, the NPCs are disastrous at best.
Right, like everything with Star citizen "THEY ARE GOING TO". I'm tired of hearing they are going to and I'm going to wait until they have done.
Don't suppose you could slow this down so some of us older hick folk can keep up.
Love you buddy! You are the most unusual charismatic creator ever.
But I can only handle so much before you cause me to stroke.
If starfield pulls it off it will beat out SC because unless you have a new powerful PC it is hard to get more than 25FPS so playing SC is very limited while it is still in Alpha state and optimized.
I know what star citizen can't do be a completed game without bugging out or crashing 😂. Star citizen is all hype that many millions to make a game that is not even playable is sad. They need to be in court 🎉.
My first thought before even watching the video and just reading the title was a campaign, 😂. 👊 Love em both, two very different games.
I played Star Citizen during the last free fly. It should not even be compared to Starfield. It’s not really a game and feels lifeless. Just a demo vs a completed game.