First Man 4K HDR | Moon Landing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 авг 2021
- #NASA #HDR #MoonLanding
First Man 4K HDR | Moon Landing - 2160p 10bit HDR 7.1 Atmos
A Biopic on the life of the legendary American Astronaut Neil Armstrong from 1961-1969, on his journey to becoming the first human to walk the moon. Exploring the sacrifices and costs on the Nation and Neil himself, during one of the most dangerous missions in the history of space travel.
If you like my stuff, please subscribe and support !
link : tinyurl.com/3xfwtbsv
Directed by : Damien Chazelle
Starring :
Ryan Gosling
Claire Foy
Jason Clarke
Kyle Chandler
Corey Stoll
Christopher Abbott
Ciarán Hinds
Shawn Eric Jones
Screenplay by : Josh Singer
Based on : First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong
Produced by :
Wyck Godfrey
Marty Bowen
Isaac Klausner
Damien Chazelle
Cinematography : Linus Sandgren
Edited by : Tom Cross
Music by : Justin Hurwitz
Production companies :
Universal Pictures
Amblin Entertainment
DreamWorks Pictures
Temple Hill Entertainment
Phantasma
Distributed by : Universal Pictures
Release date : October 12, 2018
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Universal Pictures (2018)
Fair use.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. 
Кино
This movie should have won all kinds of awards.
Score wasnt even nominated for oscars LOL
It _DID_ won all kinds of awards. In- and outside of the USA.
Check it.
You know that's real NASA recordings in the background. The guy talking to them from mission control in Houston, also known as Capcom was Charley Duke, fellow astronaut. I've known years before this movie came out that they had trouble on the way down and almost ran out of fuel, and yet it still had me on the edge of my seat. Still does to this day
2:54 This shot and music was absolutely marvellous
Damn straight. It took my breath away the first time I saw it in the theater. I was like 'whoa...' 😳💪🏻😎
That moment gets me every time. It was marvellous in the cinema. Replaying it on video allows me to look at it properly and really take it in. The music was superb, and the flight scenes were good but it was a very boring film.
This whole scene is a masterpiece. Riveting.
The use of quiet in this film was excellent.
As in 2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY.
2:54 always gives me goosebumps. They were there, and no one had ever gone there before them.
....and they were beyond the reach of all assistance. A false move and they would crash or be stranded and doomed to die quite quickly.
@@christopherquinn5899 the right stuff
Great marriage of imagery and music. That orchestral swell...
2:54 You're landin' on The bloody MOON for chrissakes!
@@christopherquinn5899 a fate more terrifying than I can imagine.
What really strikes me is that those two guys were the most isolated from humanity that anyone has ever been. So alone, in a way, but yet the eyes of the whole world were on them as well. Strange.
Isolated? They had each other. Want to talk isolation? Michael Collins is the only person in the CSM. He literally took a picture of the Earth and Moon that had every human, alive at the time, in it except for himself.
@@tpsu129 FO pissant
Meanwhile Michael Collins all Alone on the dark Side of the Moon with no Compact to houston haha
@@tpsu129
"They had eachother". Oh, what fun if something went wrong with the LM. Collins was alone too, but he had a better chance of being able to return I guess.
This sequence is so touching. Music is perfect. I can't stop watch it.
Same idea as the music when Cooper has to dock with the damaged station in Interstellar. Anxiety inducing music!
@@jamiestewart48i wouldnt say anxiety inducing music here, definitly not like with interstellar docking scene level
No, here is something different. Atm idk what it is, but its something else beacuse while it does bring in stress, it also introduces determination and epicness with just a bit of fear unlike the docking scene which trades more on said fear
Dunno random internet thoughts
@@_mikolaj_ To me it's the constant repeating bass-tone that descends, simultaneously representing the actual descend (onto something unknown - with almost no fuel left and a crater in front of you), as well as the realisation of its inevitability.. Goosebumps and tears from emotions - realising this actually happened and having watched these Apollo missions 'live' on tv as a young boy, but now watching it from the inside as if you're there.
I’m so glad this film was shot in 70mm. Feels so much more real. And the impact of switching to imax when they leave the capsule is the modern day wizard of oz sepia to color
The 'home' and dream sequences were shot in 16mm home movie camera film, too. Unusual.
An underrated movie, but certainly one which I liked a lot. The science was accurate to a good degree, and the music heightened the tension and the anticipation. Ryan Gosling probably did his best work in this movie as a commander/pilot challenging the limits of human endurance.
This is up there with the best scenes ever put to film. In addition to the historical accuracy, the filming and music are cherries on top.
The song that kicks in at 2:54 has been associated with his daughter, Karen, throughout the movie, and when it kicks in I STILL get chills all these years later.
Best part of the movie!
The 🎶score should’ve gotten an Oscar!
Wasnt even nominated ..
Justin Hurwitz needs to do a James Bond score - that bit where the horn stings kick in at 4:33 is pure John Barry. Could be playing over Roger Moore leading a team of commandos into a submarine pen.
Me and my 12 year old daughter got in the lunar module and landed it on the simulation of the moon surface and it was not easy. Respect to Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin
And michael collins
Really? Where was this?
@@johannagustsson1533Michael stayed in the service module, which stayed in orbit of the moon and never went down to it. Michael is still an amazing guy though.
@@Triplane1234 i think he meant respect to michael for staying up there on his own while they went down
@@te_rt oh my god sorry I forgot
One hell of a pilot
It's weird, we all know what happens, but it's still unbelievably tense and frightening. Fantastic marriage of soundtrack, imagery, and acting.
I find this scene so beautiful and emotional. The music and cinematography are really good
The balls on these guys.
What an accomplishment.
I watched the landing and the first moon walk live on television with my mother. Obviously it wasn't from this perspective, but it was an incredible thrill. After this the world changed, to one in which humanity had stood on another world.
Less then seventy years after humanity acheved powered flight... we sent a man to the moon. :)
Amazing to think that our phones now hold more power than this lunar model
Forgot your phone, your car keys might technically have more computing power
Phones are always about 20 years ahead of the worlds fastest super computer, as in the phones now are as powerful as the supercomputers from the early 2000s
We also need to remember, the Lunar Module computer only needed to process instructions. It didn't need to record data or display graphics. It was made as minimalist as possible to both save weight and to simplify operation to the mission essentials. Everything about the LM's design was centered around making the craft as light as possible.
6:19 Imagine the cheers in mission control
While everyone talks about music, which is absolutely fantastic, can we give some light to the sounds overall? From little cracks, to Reaction Control System thrusters' muffled bangs as they fire, alarms, and my favourite
Astronaut's breathing and silence amd breaking tone, the moment LMDE shuts down and they are on the surface
The one part of the sound design I don't like in this sequence is the alarm noise. In reality it was a harsh, buzzing sound when the programme alarms went off, not a digitised woman's voice saying "warning, warning".
I love how they actually had the LR-87 Bwoooooop noise of the start cartridges spinning up the pumps in the Gemini 8 launch scene
I think they actually got it quite right because when I searched for the LM’s alarm sound I found this
m.ruclips.net/video/f9INvTu-gOI/видео.html
But I could be wrong
greatest achievement ever done by mankind, our kind.
Lets also not discount the subsequent landings by Conrad, Shepard, Scott, Young, and Cernan. Every landing tougher than the last.
Awesome scene, great video and audio quality !!!
I know right? Have you ever seen this clip so sharply and clearly? 😎💪🏻
*"We need to fail down here so we don't fail up there"*
2:54 Nothing will ever beat this.
Soundscore should have been atleast nominated 😢
2.54 goosbumps....wat a shot and bgm!!!
The science museum Bristol has a lunar module where you can follow in Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's infamous footsteps
huh
Why infamous?
Gaves me Goosebumps chills 😍
This scene in IMAX was 🔥😍👌
We all feel like this when the tank needle is on E and heading to fill up.
So Epic!
The "very smooth touchdown" statement is the most accurate bit of the scene. According to the data from all the missions, Apollo 11 was indeed the smoothest of all the lunar landings, despite the severe problems encountered.
Cette musique grandiose se marie parfaitement avec l'exploit d'avoir posé l'équivalent d'une boîte de conserve sur la lune 👏🏼👌🏼
Et Damien Chazelle a livré de très belles images, qui magnifient cet exploit !
Remember being on the edge of my seat watching this in the cinema. Then I suddenly remembered that the mission was a success and was able to relax a bit 😂
We were there.. and again and again.. we stopped because people weren’t watching anymore.. it was “routine”.. idiots want to believe we weren’t there.. losers and underachievers. I had one of the best seats in the house literally. I stayed at my second cousins house in Thousand Oaks CA. He was a high level engineer for TRW.. yep… and he walked me through every step of what was going on.. because he was involved at the highest levels. All seemed like luck ti magically just be there from Ohio during this huge part of mankind history..but it was not luck.. for i am Blessed. So we’re the thousands of people involved in these missions..
You're about to land on the MOON, alarms are blaring, fuel is virtually gone, and somebody thinks "We better add music to make it more dramatic". Incredible.
I think that would be great on oled tv but unfortunately I don’t have one , I have led and it looks great but the black bars looks white I hope if all your clips were full screen
It depends on the movie and how it was filmed , they vary forsure.
This music is equally as good as anything from Interstellar. And I'm an Interstellar megafan 😎
My heartbeat was high watching this scene, not gonna lie. ❤❤❤
Armstrong's heart rate was about 120bpm, which belies the calm voice. ;-)
The Apollo 11 crew were a triumph of balancing personalities and skills to make the crew most likely to succeed.
People have tried to suggest all sorts of disagreements between the three of them, and others latch onto a word out of place to suggest all sorts of things.
But, like the rain frozen on Armstrong's window in this film, it's not true.
Like them almost running out of fuel. They had a full 30 seconds when they shut off the descent engine. They weren't taking any chances, and carried extra, and metred it in the most conservative way.
Compared to Apollo 17's exactness with fuel, this was a cakewalk.
That LM was the lightest, so they carried the most fuel to carry the most gear, the lunar roving vehicle, two astronauts, their suits and supplies down to the surface. They used all of their fuel. - and cut into the abort propellant to carry extra gear to do science.
They left behind almost everything, threw it out of the hatch before starting back. Even the first aid kit, the cameras, their life support backpacks, all the rubbish, food they wouldn't need, all of it.
Armstrong flying like a pilot, trading fuel for altitude to hold his descent as they cleared the crater. They were 4 seconds ahead of planned flight route, and the crater was the size of a football stadium.
There are two things that I think were awful choices when they designed this scene. The vibration of the ship when descending, and the interior of the lander being covered in grime.
It’s supposed to look realistic
@@spitfire_0851
To look realistic by NOT being realistic?
It was an artistic choice to make the lander mirror the films portrayal of Armstrong as being a depressed, nearly destroyed individual after the death of his daughter, and his inability to express his emotions.
@@dansv1 wasnt the movie based on his biography?
@@spitfire_0851
I believe so, but the lunar module would not be gritty and covered with a coat of greasy grime. It was built in a clean room and had never been used before. I think they did it just to set the mood.
@@dansv1 i must agree with that one, but the shaking was realistic. And it even makes the atmosphere much more tense. The alarms going off, Houston talking in the background, the shaking.
A technically excellent movie that bumbled through the human story it was trying to tell.
cool
The first man on Pluto will be the last one ever.
The best part of this is Buzz, the cocky asshole, realising he is in the whirlwind of history and he is powerless. You really feel his awe at Neil's genius and cant help but put yourself in his shoe's.
Buzz was far from powerless; he worked out the reason why the computer was overloading, took actions to stop that happening, and didn't bother to tell anyone, as they both were busy, except to mention he was changing the switch position. The 'in slew' mention.
During the de-orbit and descent, the radio antennae were both directional and not. 'Aft omni' was heard: it's the non-steerable rear antenna, one of four around the LM, that was almost not in communication with the ground.
The steerable antenna was controlled by the computer, and should have been allowed to find the ground station, then been switched to fixed.
The computer was continuing to try and steer that antenna during the early part of the descent, but after 'pitch-over' Buzz realised this, and switched that part of the computer's workload off. The alarms stopped.
This was fully understood afterwards, and the Apollo 12 LM was modified to prevent it happening. Buzz was the cause of and the solution to that little drama.
Nerd^
Just an FYI those program alarms are both executive overflow alarms.
Basically the computer is doing too many things, and it signals the alarm to basically say "Hey, I've just deleted the last executions on my list here. Sorry"
Fortunately it drops the least essential jobs first. But the more often that alarm appears, the more likely it will reach something more essential
and they didn't sound like they did in the movie. It was just a harsh, buzzing noise and not "warning, warning, warning"
Ole Charlie Duke at Capcom
Это было супер!!!
The 1201/1202 alarm was because the two radar data streams were overloading the computer processing speed, so it was dumping unneccesary tasks to avoid failure.
This movie has the best cinematography and sound design in history of cinema 🫣
For anyone wondering what the 12-01 or 12-02 alarm mean: the onboard computer is basically pushed to its limit. It was under just as much stress as the pilots, if not more so. You know when your computer is so overtaxed with stuff that you bring up the Task Program Manager? That, only they couldn't do that.
Most of the Powered Descent is controlled by the computer, constantly making adjustments to keep the spacecraft's center of gravity aligned with the thrust. It's not until pitchover when the astronauts take semi-auto control.
A música é sensacional, a cena também. Deixa a gente angustiado. PORÉM O HOMEM NÃO FOI A LUA. A mentira do século XX.
How many men went to the moon two times?
@@stevetheduck1425 Orleakin Bauzer... E obrigado ao homem do campo pelo feijão.
The Moon Landing sequence was worth the Movie. I noticed that in the LEM, the swithes/buttons pictured on the landing, were very dirty. Was that base on what occurred? But how did that happen? That LEM was brand new, the Armstrong and Aldrin Space Suits were clean at entry. So how did all that dirt/soot get into the LEM prior to landing??
It didn't. Neither did rain freeze on the windows. Drama.
2:54 man is never destined to ride nature, but man is alive only while trying to do it
'When riding the tiger, be very sure not to fall off'.
Bit strange of them to have Buzz say "contact light" after they showed them land.
Little known fact: Armstrong replied to Aldrin, "No sh-t Einstein." LOL !!!!
@@JxH I kinda doubt that. The LMP is supposed to call out "contact light" so the CDR can trigger engine shutdown. With the CDR's focus entirely on the window and his flight controls, it was the LMP's job to vocalize every piece of important information for the entire approach.
And yes, it is strange. Contact light illuminates when the probe (that wire-like thing that extended from the landing gear) touches the surface, so the engine can be shut down a few feet above, and the LM slowly drops the remaining few feet to the surface.
IMO, from the earth to the moon did this sequence better..
The music on this scene is on point.
I really felt bored while watching this movie but the space flight and the moon scene and the music my god the music stuck in my head after watching the movie, I just forgot how boring the movie was after the moon landing scene
A 54 años del primer alunizaje en la historia de la humanidad
How did they accurately measure altitude from the moon’s surface? Laser rangefinders?
radar altimeters. Basically a radar rangefinder.
RADARs used to read both distance above the moon, and 'slant range' to where the LM was aiming for on the surface.
These two together, plus information from an inertial platform, were integrated by the computer to give time to landing, an estimated position of the landing ( which Armstrong had to override ), and vertical rate of descent, AND change of rate of vertical descent.
There were other factors, such as the LMs changing mass as fuel was burnt off, but those were the main ones.
Almost
My mom was 4 months pregnant with me when this happened. 🤣
Don't understand why they changed this so much. The LM *_never_* skimmed over a giant crater like that. Not during the Apollo 11 landing or any other.
They would not have even attempted a landing so close to such a dangerous location. And this was decided _years_ earlier!
because its not a documentary, its a movie. They have no obligation to be 100% accurate. They do have an obligation to be entertaining, otherwise people won't watch it.
They just wanted to add a little tension
The original landing target was the one strewn with giant boulders. It is a fact that after continuing beyond it, they came upon a crater (dubbed 'Little West Crater') which they had to pass over to reach their new landing site. Little West Crater is roughly stadium-sized, not as immense as shown in the film. It's a movie, not a documentary.
They 100% did decend over little West crater which is well documented
@@hettbeans Close - It was West crater that was roughly stadium sized which they had to pass over. Little West was a smaller 30m crater they also had to pass over afterwards.
Too much shake and high frequency vibration. This gives more of an impression of moving through turbulent air at very high speed. In reality, the ride was glass smooth.
Maneuver rates were too brisk. In reality roll and pitch were executed much more languidly.
The whole landing site looked more like the highlands, and not the boringly flat plain they picked out.
That crater they hopped over looked here like the one on that asteroid in The Empire Strikes Back. The real thing was VERY much smaller and gentle of slope.
The translation speed across the surface until just a few seconds before touchdown was ridiculous. In reality they were largely hovering, with only a quite slight drift, for far longer.
In a vacuum the exhaust from both the main engine and the RCS thrusters is quite invisible.
But I will say that the visuals otherwise were very well done.
Congrats, you discovered the difference between a Hollywood movie and a documentary
@@noahpalmieri941 At the tender age of 61, I made this discovery of the difference between reality and fiction many decades ago. ;) My point is that reality doesn't have to be jettisoned in the service of drama. Indeed, it's often the case that the subtleties of realism are more impactful than unnecessary exaggeration.
That's a fair point and I agree with you. The sad thing is that these movies won't get made unless they have some exaggeration worked in to the plot. They need to make money at the box office to justify further being made in the genre. I think some exaggerations to make the movie more appealing to the public are worth it, as they allow it to make more $ and thus justify subsequent movies in the genre. Have a nice holiday and new year
@@glennledrew8347
Another thing that bothered me was the inside of the LM was shown as being coated in grime as if it had flown many times.
lol@@noahpalmieri941
5:51 is historically incorrect or rather - shown in the wrong sequence. "Contact light" was visible to Neil, when the "Antennas" (Lunar Surface Sensing probes) touched the ground at 5:41. The idea was that the LEM would not land with engines blasting, but rather hover over the ground for a few seconds (as it is correctly shown in 5:41). Once the contact light was on, Neil would then shut down the engines and the LEM would touch the ground fully. The Landing pads were able to dampen the little free fall in the low moon gravity. I was seriously pissed off in the cinema when they got that part wrong.😂
This movie was clearly meant for spectacle of the event, rather than accuracy. But in a way, that's fine, because we already have From The Earth to The Moon to give us said accuracy.
@@k1productions87 Well yeah that's true for most movies, although I believe showing am accurate sequence of events can be a spectacle as well. Still haven't seen Earth to the Moon!
@@hartekunst554 That is why you should definitely see it, as it is thus far the most accurate representation of the Apollo program ever dramatized. The only down side in my book is the Apollo 13 episode, which instead focused on a fictional news studio,... but then, the movie already covered everything else :P
Not only is the episode "Mare Tranquilitatis" a wonderful depiction of the Apollo 11 landing, but we also get entire episodes devoted to Apollo 9 and designing the Lunar Module, Apollo 12 making the trip to the moon feel like a best buddy road trip, and Apollo 15 about inspiring the astronauts to truly appreciate geology and the Moon itself.
Michael Collins was the only human who was farther away on his own than any human from the earth. Neil and Ald yes brilliant. of course...just saying
Conspiracy theorists; Apollo 11 was fake. Me: then explain the pictures and the lunar modules including Apollo 11 on the moon sent back by the Chinese moon rover..And the Russian moon rover? Conspiracy theorists: um...um....um. Silence follows crickets in the background. Me: oh dear another conspiracy theory down the crapper😂😂😂
You are close to that conspiracist in terms of knowing what are you talking about
1)Non rover EVER took pictures of Apollo, satellites did
2)It was Indian and Chinese (and American itself but doesn’t count I guess), not Russian
3)The main thing here is Apollo 15+ sites on wich difference between footprint trail and wheel trails is visible
@cheevpalpatine3166 I haven't seen these satellite images. Could you send a link? I'm fascinated by stuff like that.
You guys clearly don’t have experience in talking to conspiracy theorists. In order to eliminate their entire conspiracy you gotta come up with your own conspiracy that just completely remove their. For example, if they believe the moon landing isn’t real you gotta say “psst you believe the moon exist”.
Who filmed the capsule leaving the mothership ? Who filmed Armstrong going down the ladder from outside ? Who filmed the capsule taking off from the moon and tracked it going upwards ? Complete none sense. Conveniently no stars ever in any shots. According to current knowledge, standing on the moon with no atmosphere or magnetic field, would be like standing in the core of a nuclear reactor such would be the radiation from the Sun. One scientist contacted the manufacturers of the Space suit to see if they could be used in a nuclear reactor and the company said no. Complete BS, plus have you seen the footage from the Indian moon landing, if you believe that you have to be stupid lol
@@BOOSETO Here ya go ^_^ www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
Watching the real landing live, as it happened, was much more intense than this.
Sorry.
Have you seen the HBO miniseries "From The Earth to The Moon"?
The Moon landing produced by Kubrick in 1969 was a real masterpiece.
😅😅😮😅😅😮😅😅😅😅well ingormeti0n.Good show more 😅😅
Great scene, but a couple of inaccuracies bothers me. For starters: they at some point flies over the West Crater, and this is historically accurate. But the West Crater was not the horrendous, bottomless black hole with sharp and menacing edges depicted here. In reality it was little more than a modest depression, with a very visible bottom that was filled with rocks. The problem, if the LM had landed here, would have been probably the angle of landing, that, if had exceeded a precise value, would have prevent the take off from surface. Second: at 2:48 Armstrong shut down the alarm with angry. While this makes sense in the context of the scene and helps to build the impression of the near-mystical determination that driven this man against the stubborness of the primitive hardware he had at disposal, is very unlikely that this happened in reality. This is not in accordance with his personality. Actually, the computer started to show alarms because of a human error: they left ON the LM rendez-vous radar, that continued to feed the computer with unnecessary data during the descent, causing the overload and thus the alarms. But the onboard computer was far to stupid or primitive: on the contrary, it was very well programmed and so smart that can attribute low priority to some tasks, while continuing to perform the main program, that was the landing procedure. A lesser piece of hardware and software would have lead certainly to an abort or a crash. Third: while the red lettering of the digital displays are certainly adequate for the sake of drama, in reality were all green.
In the end, I suspect that this movie fundamentally misunderstood the essence of Neil Armstrong. He is depicted here as a depressed man, unable to show even the slightest emotion. I don't think he was really like that.
It’s Hollywood - gotta over dramatize everything. Even events like this that already have enough drama.
Fortunately we already had From The Earth to The Moon to give us a more accurate interpretation of events. And since we already have that to watch whenever we wish, this time the focus was making the spectacle of the Moon landing as grand as possible. And quite frankly,... the event deserves grandeur, rather than the ambivalence it has gotten in the half century since
you conspiracy is wrong
Movie was pretty lame actually. The grime in the white room and the filty switches in the spacecraft? C'mon.
A maior mentira do século XX.....kkk.
Special effects were pretty good - but that's about it. Highly overrated.
The music just completely ruined this entire scene for me. It's not that it's bad on its own merits but it just seemed completely and utterly out of place and anti-climatic for a MOON LANDING scene.
The music is so stupid and inappropriate! And I see only Ken, where is Barby?
.....Ryan Gosling also played Neil in this.
Fake: We did not land on the moon, i watched a facebook video so now im an expert and know more about EVERYTHING than you!
Only if Hans Zimmer had composed for this film! THEN he would've given this scene an extra boost!
Siempre ay que dar oportunidades a mas conpositores ,no solo esta Hans ay muchos mas que son muy buenos en este ambito
I don't think Hans could have made a better one than this 2:54
no Hurwitz has done this perfectly - it's his film. There are many amazing and talented composers before Zimmer and there will be many after him, he is only one of them.
@@akula444 fax
The whole story of man landing on the moon is perhaps the biggest lie ever told. It is the ultimate long con. And you are the mark.
Think about it for a second. The Soviets, our biggest geopolitical rival, monitored the entire mission. Had the US faked it as you claim, not only would they have seen it, they would have blown the lid off of it. They wouldn't have hesitated in calling us out creating the largest, most damaging and embarrassing scandal in US history. There is absolutely no way they wouldn't have jumped at an opportunity like that.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 you sap
Do your research before mouthing off
Nonsense. Independent witnesses, tracking the ships to and from the moon, exist in many countries.
It was normal for space to examined with radar.
People and Governments were looking for un-announced Soviet or Chinese launches, for fear of nuclear bombs being placed in space, in contravention of international treaty.
Here in Britain we watched with great interest, in France, the Soviet Union, and in China.
Everyone wanted to know if the US had pulled a trick.
The Soviets even congratulated the guys at NASA for doing it and described the orbits used, to let people know they were watching. It's worth looking these things up.
If you think 'everything is fake' when you do, try a quote in my old Children's Encyclopedia, published in 1908 , where schoolkids have questions answered including 'If someone were to stand upon the moon, would the Earth be up in the sky as the moon is to us?'
Smart kid, able to put himself in another person's position and then think.
The answer in 1908 was; ' - while we are sure no-one lives upon the moon , and anything the size of St. Paul's Cathedral would be quite visible by telescope , and yes , if we were to stand upon the moon , the top of your head would be closest to Earth , just as the top of your head is closest to the moon , while standing here upon the Earth'.
how tf do you remaster these clips
Very unrealistic sequence. Makes it look like it was uber-dicey, and Buzz was nothing if not calm and measured in his callouts to Neil.
The YT video 'Apollo 11 PDI to Touchdown' covers what was said quite well. Most people involved are quite calm, though one guy is sharply told to get off the air by Gene Krantz.