That’s not correct as he could also survive in other types of aircraft’s? Wouldn’t he? If he pulled a parachute (don’t why he didn’t) maybe than you could write “Thanks to Cirrus parachute another life saved. Currently you sharing misinformation.
@@YouCanSeeATCwhatcha babbling about?? He was flying a Cirrus; pulled the chute; life saved thanks to the Cirrus engineering/technology. I also like the fact that pilot didn’t try to land on the highway, which puts others at risk.
Don’t ask to come back if you have an emergency: tell them what you’re doing. And please don’t ask controllers what you should do to land your aircraft. You’re the pilot in command.
Another cirrus engine failure. What's up with so many loss of power situations in aircraft? I've been driving all sorts of vehicles for 40 years and I've never had one of them just stop running. And they don't get the meticulous maintenance that aircraft do
Also it doesn't just stop running, they usually start to lose oil pressure and it requires more and more throttle for the engine to run until it locks up or throws a rod
Piston aircraft engines are essentially 50 years out of date compared with the technology in modern motor vehicle engines. Leaded fuel. Mechanical fuel injection. Magneto ignition. No computer controls. The problem is that the market for piston aircraft engines is tiny, and it's incredibly expensive to get anything new certified by the FAA. The incentive to develop a new engine with modern technology is minimal, and the risk is very high. There are other reasons why aircraft engines face a more demanding set of operating conditions than motor vehicle engines (high loads, wide range for intake temperatures and pressures, need for high power to weight ratio), but the reality is that we know how to make piston engines extremely reliable in very demanding conditions. There is just no incentive in the piston aircraft engine space to do anything other than ship derivatives of obsoletr but "good enough" designs.
Yes, they ran a trial where they put a chute on a door plug to make sure everybody on the plane would survive. Test was a success, according to Boeing and only Boeing
Another life saved thanks to Cirrus
👍
That’s not correct as he could also survive in other types of aircraft’s? Wouldn’t he?
If he pulled a parachute (don’t why he didn’t) maybe than you could write “Thanks to Cirrus parachute another life saved.
Currently you sharing misinformation.
@@YouCanSeeATCwhatcha babbling about?? He was flying a Cirrus; pulled the chute; life saved thanks to the Cirrus engineering/technology.
I also like the fact that pilot didn’t try to land on the highway, which puts others at risk.
@@PDGX I think you replied to the wrong person
@@FilipBzik ...he did pull the parachute...currently YOU sharing misinformation
Pilot was so calm it sounded like he was ordering at a drive thru window.
I didn't think he was calm, I think he wanted the controller to fly the airplane for him!!!
I live in South Jersey it was all over the news. Thanks for posting the audio.
Thank you for watching 👍
Don’t ask to come back if you have an emergency: tell them what you’re doing.
And please don’t ask controllers what you should do to land your aircraft. You’re the pilot in command.
Cool as a cucumber.
Another cirrus engine failure. What's up with so many loss of power situations in aircraft? I've been driving all sorts of vehicles for 40 years and I've never had one of them just stop running. And they don't get the meticulous maintenance that aircraft do
Aircraft engines work under a higher throttle load at all times than automotive engines
Also it doesn't just stop running, they usually start to lose oil pressure and it requires more and more throttle for the engine to run until it locks up or throws a rod
I don’t think we are watching RUclips videos on car engine failures either.
You’re absolutely right.
Piston aircraft engines are essentially 50 years out of date compared with the technology in modern motor vehicle engines. Leaded fuel. Mechanical fuel injection. Magneto ignition. No computer controls.
The problem is that the market for piston aircraft engines is tiny, and it's incredibly expensive to get anything new certified by the FAA. The incentive to develop a new engine with modern technology is minimal, and the risk is very high.
There are other reasons why aircraft engines face a more demanding set of operating conditions than motor vehicle engines (high loads, wide range for intake temperatures and pressures, need for high power to weight ratio), but the reality is that we know how to make piston engines extremely reliable in very demanding conditions. There is just no incentive in the piston aircraft engine space to do anything other than ship derivatives of obsoletr but "good enough" designs.
Does Boeing use parachutes on their aircrafts?
No
lol
Only on their executives
They pop doors off, not chutes.
Yes, they ran a trial where they put a chute on a door plug to make sure everybody on the plane would survive. Test was a success, according to Boeing and only Boeing
Here's a tip.
Don't ask all those questions like this Pilot did, execute the plan that should have been on standby!!!