The two hosts focus their discussion mostly on the interviewing skills from a bygone era. Unfortunately, they show very little understanding of the field of Change Management. Their comments demonstrate that they perceive anything changing to qualify as skills in the Change Management. Let's move to the 21st century. If changes are so pervasive wouldn't the right change be to see the Change Management as the core and critical practice in running any organization (business, government, schools, etc). If that is the case, there has been evolution from the Change Management to Change Leadership and beyond. I assume Australia is lagging behind because of organizations employing managers who feel happy with the status quo and using interviewing practices that are activity/tools-based and not purpose-driven.
The two hosts focus their discussion mostly on the interviewing skills from a bygone era. Unfortunately, they show very little understanding of the field of Change Management. Their comments demonstrate that they perceive anything changing to qualify as skills in the Change Management. Let's move to the 21st century. If changes are so pervasive wouldn't the right change be to see the Change Management as the core and critical practice in running any organization (business, government, schools, etc). If that is the case, there has been evolution from the Change Management to Change Leadership and beyond. I assume Australia is lagging behind because of organizations employing managers who feel happy with the status quo and using interviewing practices that are activity/tools-based and not purpose-driven.