1:10 Should I go around? +1 Point for gusty winds +2 Points for not aligning with the runway +2 Points for a near wing strike -4 Points if you are flying a Ryanair jet If you have 3 or more points, go around.
It really should be mentioned in the video that Airbus manufacturing is based in Toulouse & anything happening out of the ordinary there is totally ordinary, it's just testing ! The airframe still has it's French registration meaning it has yet to be delivered to the customer.
A Shiny new Airbus A350 registration F-WZFC, first flight November 27, 2024. Customer acceptance (4th) flight was December 13. To be registered to Delta as N526DN
@xfirehurican, u must be joking, because the video is ALREADY written in anglosajón, Duh Duh, wake up and go back to sleep 😴, or do something else with y/r head 😢😢😢😢😢😢
Rumor has that the pilot was sent for additional training hours and warned of dire consequences if any of the next 15 landings is made less smoother than this one. Welcome to Ryan Air.
Zeltweg was the site of the first Austrian Grand Prix held in 1964 on a circuit laid out on the airport runways. Most of the field was wrecked with various suspension failures by the unusually hard track surface.
@@CerberusTenshi > Reversers have very limited functionality at low speeds. Why is that? (except for danger of debris blown forward by reversed exhaust and sucked into the engine)
Yup, but if the good Lord is going to forgive anything, surely this qualifies. Incredible what designers, engineers and aviators achieve in the current age.
As with approaches and landings there are limits which vary: for a given flight it all depends on factors like: equipment available both onboard and at the airfield; licensing status of the aircraft and the crew; national variations in legislation. Individual operators may also have their own more stringent standard operating procedures.
You wouldn’t drop the anchor that much for an RTO unless there was crossing aircraft directly ahead of you. A dab on the brakes and idle reverse would be more than enough otherwise you risk hot brakes, as happened here, which may well prevent you from taking off again.
Yon can tell which airlines are the worst when their pilots can’t control the aircraft in somewhat adverse conditions. That Ethiopian take off and loss of centreline tracking just shows how hopeless the pilot really is.
hmm, don't know where i read that, just googled a comparative list of military jets /cost per hour. Still, I'm sure I read it somewhere - what do mil jet nerds say? A different opinion foe each and every one of us i reckon? 😄
@@VanderlyndenJengold All military aircraft are expensive to operate. It's also highly depending on where they operate. A Hornet operating on an aircraft carrier is more expensive than a Hornet flying in the midwest. An F-16 flying in Afghanistan is more expensive to operate than one flying in Poland. So it's really not that clear cut to say.
Congratulation to the Part with the perfect MS Flightsimulator Vid !🤭😁 ...´climbing through a dense layer of Fog´ 🤭😬🙄Nevertheless I always appreciate the nearly 3 min of Aviation !
That foggy take off was cool!
Yeah, I loved that one too!
No Doubt about it!!!🎉
Is Minneappolis at 36,000 ft elevation? 🤔
For a brief moment it looked like the opening scene in the title credits for "Airplane" from 1980 with the shark fin !
@MatthewPettyST1300 can't unsee it now
1:10 Should I go around?
+1 Point for gusty winds
+2 Points for not aligning with the runway
+2 Points for a near wing strike
-4 Points if you are flying a Ryanair jet
If you have 3 or more points, go around.
I was horrified that it didn't go around!
Wow that Rayanair landing
Ryanair's landings is always "wow".
You get what you pay for
There wasn't a breath of wind in Manchester that day. Ryanair just being Ryanair.
Not so much of a bad landing considering that Ryan Air is a dare devil landing airline company.
Ryanair pilot does an amazing job landing during a storm, and YT armchair experts are all “classic Ryanair heavy landing”….🙄
The last one I was gonna say, you call that verti--- ohhhh😆
I thought the same. It was as I watched the gear coming up that I wondered if the gear had to come up first. Apparently it did.😂
It really should be mentioned in the video that Airbus manufacturing is based in Toulouse & anything happening out of the ordinary there is totally ordinary, it's just testing ! The airframe still has it's French registration meaning it has yet to be delivered to the customer.
Yes, looked like some tires were not turning.
The fact that someone was filming and was specifically zoomed in on the wheels was the first clue.
A Shiny new Airbus A350 registration F-WZFC, first flight November 27, 2024. Customer acceptance (4th) flight was December 13. To be registered to Delta as N526DN
The owner of this site liked to be bombastic.
Saved my typing all this 👍🏻
That Ryan landing showed some excellent flying.
To Three Minutes of Aviation: Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Successful New Year 😀 🎉. Thanks for your work. 💙
*BRAVO ZULU! Excellent set!*
@xfirehurican, u must be joking, because the video is ALREADY written in anglosajón, Duh Duh, wake up and go back to sleep 😴, or do something else with y/r head 😢😢😢😢😢😢
Ironically that Ryanair pilot has just had their softest ever landing.
Rumor has that the pilot was sent for additional training hours and warned of dire consequences if any of the next 15 landings is made less smoother than this one. Welcome to Ryan Air.
Jet fighter at 2:05 is a Sukhoi Su-30MKI - I had to look this up because I didn't know of a jet with twin vertical tails and canards.
I was just about to investigate this. Thought it was a Mig-29 at first, but the canards made me think otherwise :)
Looks so beautiful as if the cockpit and the fuselage are joined together in the end after getting assembled but not for each other.
Su-30 MKM. MKI is Indian. Externally they are pretty much the same. The avionics are different.
That A320 takeoff was beautiful
The combination of skilled pilots and modern technology is amazing.
Delta A350 at Toulouse: testing the brakes. Not a commercial flight. Delta does not fly to Toulouse.
They were all in. They had nothing Toulouse.
Love Groaners ! 😅 @@skydiverclassc2031
@@skydiverclassc2031nice one xD
Zeltweg was the site of the first Austrian Grand Prix held in 1964 on a circuit laid out on the airport runways. Most of the field was wrecked with various suspension failures by the unusually hard track surface.
Love these videos so much!
1:43 damn these brakes must've been hot 🔥
but why didn't they use the reversers?
@@charlestoast4051 test flight
@@charlestoast4051 1. It's a test for the effectiveness of the brakes. 2. Reversers have very limited functionality at low speeds.
@@CerberusTenshi
> Reversers have very limited functionality at low speeds.
Why is that?
(except for danger of debris blown forward by reversed exhaust and sucked into the engine)
@@charlestoast4051 against procedure to do so due to possible dangerous side effects
Another awesome video 👌
As a A&P tech I love this channel.
The fact that RyanAir actually landed despite the risks says a lot about those dare devel pilots😂
It says a lot about their attitude to safety.
Wow! Just WOW! 👍🏻👍🏻
Some truly excellent videos. I enjoyed this episode immensely.
Great video!
Me watching the Finnish Hornet: That's not particularly vertic... HOLY SHIT!!!!
Lol, me too! Whoa, wow!!!!
That Delta take-off made me think of the opening sequences of Airplane.
I love your videos so much
The weathervaning of the airplane into the wind when the wheels leave the ground is quite startling, especially in a smaller plane.
I apologise for swearing at 2:46.
Same lol!!!
Yup, but if the good Lord is going to forgive anything, surely this qualifies. Incredible what designers, engineers and aviators achieve in the current age.
Question: Is there something similar to the categorizations for landings also for a take off? Are there "minimums" like at least x visibility?
As with approaches and landings there are limits which vary: for a given flight it all depends on factors like: equipment available both onboard and at the airfield; licensing status of the aircraft and the crew; national variations in legislation. Individual operators may also have their own more stringent standard operating procedures.
Typically 125m or more visibility required. However, you can totally lose visibility, above a certain speed, and still take off. That’s pretty scary.
Legacy Hornets rule !
Ryan air pilot knew how to land in the gusting cross wind.
Awesome!
In the first clip peep the A320 crabbing in for landing. Insane
That was an awesome brake test with the Delta bird at Toulouse. Stuff like that may happen...
You wouldn’t drop the anchor that much for an RTO unless there was crossing aircraft directly ahead of you. A dab on the brakes and idle reverse would be more than enough otherwise you risk hot brakes, as happened here, which may well prevent you from taking off again.
Ryan air doesn't battle dangerous wind gusts, wind guests battle dangerous Ryan air.
1:03 Ryanair had to land there & then otherwise 1 yr's salary would be deducted from captain and aircrew alike!
The foggy takeoff as well as Ryan air landing shows that Boeing and Airbus have missed the apex of the league 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Plane disappears during takeoff! It will suddenly reappear after five and a half years
Nice
"Far off the centerline"? LOL You can tell you've never flown an airliner.
Why no reverse thrust instead of roasting the brakes?
a test
Certification tests don’t include using reverse thrust. Just brakes. Reversers are an extra!
As we see, Ryanair pilots need strong and gusty winds to butter a landing.
Correction: The crosswind blew the Airbus PILOT off centerline.
Wow
foggy takeoff reminds me of the beginning of the movie Airplane!
Cool
That fighter escorting the commercial flight looked like an Su-27 or variant.
Sukhoi Su-30MKI I think.
What fog?
Oh!
The Ryanair pilot was obviously on a promise from the other half
I think that was a330 neo cuz the winglet and also it has jet escort
Yon can tell which airlines are the worst when their pilots can’t control the aircraft in somewhat adverse conditions. That Ethiopian take off and loss of centreline tracking just shows how hopeless the pilot really is.
Ryanair is strong enough more than the storm,never go around 😅
Go around is an expensive thing for the airline. Ryan Air is considering charging passengers the extra fuel cost if landing is aborted.
Would not say the plane was exactly blown off the runway !
No more fighter jets!
Brother; dark mode when??
Why do they build airports where it's windy?
Why do they blow winds where airports are?
@@u2bear377 😂😂😂😂
Sadly, no Aerosucre.
The forbidden engine vape
Running the risk of compressor stall
Ryanair dodgy af stay away from
hi
I read the F/A 18 is a very expensive plane to operate in that it costs a lot in maintenance to fly.
hmm, don't know where i read that, just googled a comparative list of military jets /cost per hour. Still, I'm sure I read it somewhere - what do mil jet nerds say? A different opinion foe each and every one of us i reckon? 😄
@@VanderlyndenJengold All military aircraft are expensive to operate. It's also highly depending on where they operate. A Hornet operating on an aircraft carrier is more expensive than a Hornet flying in the midwest. An F-16 flying in Afghanistan is more expensive to operate than one flying in Poland. So it's really not that clear cut to say.
We're all taught even in a tiny cessna how to do a cross wind landing. Aint vas dramatic as it seems
Congratulation to the Part with the perfect MS Flightsimulator Vid !🤭😁 ...´climbing through a dense layer of Fog´ 🤭😬🙄Nevertheless I always appreciate the nearly 3 min of Aviation !
1:50 someone forgot to select reverse thrust on the rejected takeoff..
Someone desperately needs to work on his reading compreension.....rejected takeoff huh ? yeah right.....
One really should nt mess up. There's always a go around.
bank angle
hi