Chief Justice Roberts on Cameras in the Court (C-SPAN)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июн 2018
- Chief Justice Roberts on whether the time has come to televise Supreme Court oral arguments: "No...Television changes a lot...It has the potential of hurting the Court." Also, "We're the most transparent branch in government."
WATCH full interview at 8pm ET on C-SPAN cs.pn/2tBQ2um
I support the opinion of the Chief Justice on not televising the proceedings.
I think if anything, Congress might be better if they took the cameras out of it
Well said sir! I appreciate the argument and opinion presented. I think you have explained your point well. Though, the more eyes you have on a process, the less likely it is for corruption to occur...
Adam Longmire Corruption? What corruption are you talking about?
Can they not handle random legitimate and illegitmate judgments on their judgments?
TRY to HELP you What are you talking about?
Isn’t it our right as citizens to attend court cases? T.v. Allows us as citizens to participate in our right. We all know thru T.V. The government will then not be required to provide a space large enough for all citizens that wish to attend. If we (as citizens) choose to participate we can, if not we turn off the T.V.
I think he is probably the least political judge on the court today. I really like him.
How can a court be the "most transparent" when no one can see what is going on behind closed doors? People need to be able to see and hear the oral arguments to understand the pros and cons of a case, in my humble opinion.
Dennis Binns I can understand the listening but why do they need to see it? What do we want to look for?
That will only politicize the court.
i really did have to hear this......and cspan aint my favorite program
Roberts you were just expose thank you God
If armed militias show up at the court, as they did in Michigan, would you reconsider the ruling on the Second Amendment?
Oh shut up crybaby
we need five cameras.....in case i moon the courts for being corrupted
ask the court..do they need a son that believes in moral law
What corruption? All they have to do is decide one way or another.
this isn’t a Judicial, or Political, Committee :) political opinions of precedential Court rulings are quite Immaterial.
Why should we televise Supreme Court oral arguments?
What do they think we are?
A Republic?
Éamonn Síoċáin Yes, we are a republic.
CSPAN, your entire channel is essentially based on the value of cameras watching our government. When Roberts glibly says "no" it gets laughs because it's so dismissive and condescending. "No institution is improved by cameras, they're only made worse" and the CSPAN host has no comeback!? When he says senators speak to empty rooms, remind our Chief Judge we only know that fact because of the cameras! Remind him that people are more interested and more informed when cameras are present. Point out that the public was less informed about their government before the use of cameras. Point out that his worry of "showboating" is just as applicable to audio recordings and transcripts.
-OR- just do what this host did, sit by and smile and politely take it while Roberts disparages the entire CSPAN method and mission.
You should watch John Oliver’s take because it parodied them through them being dogs. When you have the camera, all of these comedy shows can edited these proceedings, to make them ‘funny’. So, it can create a misinterpretation of what went on.
never show boat...just be right
It is not a performance, just do your job. If the people want cameras deal with it. Television is passe.
Sure it is performance. It’s not the justices’ job to please the mob, it is to interpret what’s right in the Constitution.
not transparent enough for the people thanks Roberts......... Judges and lawyers have had it too good for too long.
Chief Justice is a bozo
I believe it should be televised. That way, the criminals would not want to be embarrased and not so much crime. Also, we would have better judges.
Speaking of criminals, cameras can make the lawyers so focused on them because of their reputation that it can blurry the facts and can make an innocent person look guilty. Same thing with the jury.
we need to make sure they stay out of the bar...........and let justice serve........that 3rd branch....i hope i never lose faith in
i went to prison over justice........i hope they never forget people that pull the time.......and changed the right way
cspan.....i admit.....the judged saved my ass because he knew i had a child to support and a job i would lose........if justice did not serve the right way
now that is what you call predicence....not...sentenceing matrix
Justice Roberts is a fucking commie