The Life-Changing Message That Christians Can’t Afford to Ignore - Voddie Baucham
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- Voddie Baucham MESSAGE - The Life-Changing Message That Christians Can’t Afford to Ignore
#voddiebaucham #voddie #ministries
Voddie Tharon Baucham is a pastor, author, and educator, demonstrating his dedication to spreading religious knowledge and leading a congregation.
Academic background: He has a strong academic background with degrees from several institutions and even conducted research at the prestigious University of Oxford.
#voddie baucham revelation series,
voddie #baucham revelation,
voddie baucham #sermons today,
voddie baucham sermons #update,
voddie baucham sermons #2024,
founders #ministries voddie baucham,
dr. voddie baucham,
voddie baucham #church,
#best of voddie baucham,
Praise Honor and Glory to God and Christ Jesus. Guide us through this life with your Grace and loving kindness. AMEN.
Amen 🙏 and God bless you always Voddie Baucham for sharing the Gospel Truth.
Thank you Lord for Voddie Baucham. Give him strength to continue sharing the Word , the TRUE WORD from you Lord.
The life changing message that Christians can't afford to ignore is that while we were yet sinners, JESUS CHRIST died for us, love not the world because it's a dumpster full of per erted demons and illusions and traps for the souls of men
I live in England And having King still don't feel right But now he's letting the kingdom down with what's going on our streets Trun he's back on church of England like they have on the people. Give thanks to the only king and Lordsf Lords Jesus Chris 🙏 ❤🇬🇧💯 We need you so much patience and ❤ in the 🌎 right now 🙏🙏💯🙏🙏
Check out tim Cohen's the antichrist and a cup of tea god bless you
Please remove the sappy music. Pastor Voddie doesn’t need it.
Enough with the music!
One Church in unity not separated or segregated or a man made name put to it
Background music is a distraction it is an insult to the sermon, please do not play it. Thank you. E.T
yes it is strange to say the least
What is strange?
MUCH OF THE VIDEO HAS CATHOLIC SCREENS. THIS SPEAKER IS NOT A CATHOLLIC.
I SEE YOUR DECEPTION.
Yeah I have seen a few of the vids and i don’t like the catholic stuff in the back ground either. Voddie is a reformed baptist. Not Catholic.
Jesus Has Free Will
The Father has given every creation free will, including Jesus. Jesus did not have to die for our sins; he voluntarily died for us because he loves us and wants us to be reconciled to the Father. Jesus told me himself that it was a big honor for him, which I've never heard anyone say in my life. Jesus says that he “has many things to say and to judge of you: BUT he that sent me is true.” Jesus then professes how he is choosing to use his free will, which is to “speak to the world those things which he has heard of the Father.” Jesus also lets us know that if he changed his mind and prayed to the Father, then the Father would send more than 12 legions of angels. Whatever the Father wants of Jesus, he does. Jesus chose to freely give his life for our sins, and no man took it from him; Jesus has the power to lay it down, and the power to take it again, as this is the commandment Jesus received from the Father (John 10:17-18).
Your statement about Jesus borders on blasphemy, and your statement about yourself being a prophet is groundless. Jesus, as Holy Scripture reveals, is the creator all things and nothing that was created was created without Him.
Jesus is God, He is the second Person of the Trinity that means He is the uncreated Divine God. So no Jesus was bound to will of the Father for it was His own will too.
What’s the yellow floating dots for!!!! They are very distracting.
@@rocketscientisttoo Yes, this is because the Father appointed him as heir and *gave* him all power and authority in heaven and earth (Matthew 28:18).
Jesus said he can do NOTHING without the Father. God can do ANYTHING, no matter the condition. This is because only the Father is the one true God, which is what Jesus tells us in John 17:3. Paul outlines this clearly in 1 Corinthians 8:6-7.
True
The church will go through the tribulations
We will NOT be raptured
1st Thessalonians chapter 4:16-17
And we will have the mark of God that his wrath won't touch us,what a mighty God we have
Enough already with the orbs of light and catholic trappings. This is weighty material.
HEY...A SPEECH WHICH HASNT DIRECTED BY THE LORD.IS NO SPEECH..VODDIE BAUCHAM ISNT ANNOINTED SERVANT OF ALMIGHTY. MANY OF HAS THINK SO ITS BECAUSE U LACK DISCERNMENT FAIL TO WALK CIRCUMSPECT BEFORE GOD.ITS WHY ANYTHING THAT SOUND NICE NONE OF U KNOWN WHICH SPIRIT IS TALKING..ITS SAD AND FRIGHTENING..
emperor constantine has replaced the shabbath with sunday. and knowhere in the bible does YHWH say oh he guys sunday is now my new day. start use your brains that YHWH has given you. and if you know the truth, don,t be afraid to fallow god and sacrifice absolutaly averything for yeshuah haMashiach. in yeshuah haMashiach name alone amein.
The Shabbat is God's ordained REST day. Nowhere in the Bible does it tell us what day is set aside for WORSHIP.
In the new testament the first day of the week is the day of the week Christ was resurrected and it's called the Lord's day not the Sabbath day. Acts 20:7, 1 Corinthians 16:2, revelation 1:10
It's the day Christians gather in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Although Constantine made Sunday the official Roman day of rest (in 321AD), doing so merely abolished the 8-day week the Roman Empire had inherited from the Etruscans - which had also been the norm in various parts of the Roman Empire - and facilitated what was by then a widespread, centuries-old, majority Christian preference in the western Roman Empire for worshiping on Sundays.
The earliest _clear_ reference to Sunday worship is found in the _Epistle of Barnabas_ (c.120), in which the writer says: “Your present sabbaths are not acceptable to Me… we keep the eighth day with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead”.
Justin Martyr (c.140) wrote of “memoirs of the apostles” being read on “the day called that of the sun” alongside the “writings of the prophets” ( _First Apology_ 67).
Many others also wrote of Christian worship on Sundays well before the 4th century; and of other Christians who continued to worship on Saturdays.
Taken as a whole, the New Testament is unequivocal in its support for the Christian observance of the Biblical sabbath, which ran from sunset on Friday to sunset on Saturday (cf. Leviticus 23:32; Deuteronomy 28:66; Esther 4:16).
For example, expecting Sabbath observance to continue until the end times, Jesus - the Lord of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5) - told his disciples to pray that, when they see the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place, their flight not be on a Sabbath (Matthew 24:15-20).
In Acts 13:42-48, jewish and gentile converts alike observed the Sabbath.
When writing to _gentile_ Christians in 48AD, the Council at Jerusalem noted: “from early generations Moses has had in every city those who preach him, for he is read every Sabbath in the synagogues” (Acts 15:21). In other words, the Council was writing to sabbath-observing gentiles. At this early stage in church history, there was no New Testament for Christian congregations (which typically met in synagogues) to draw on.
In Acts 20:7, the breaking of bread refers to the evening meal after the Sabbath was over. Hence, the 'breaking of bread' was the Saturday evening meal. Note that the reference is to the Jewish 'first day of the week', which ran from sunset on Saturday to sunset on Sunday, and not to the Roman 'Day of the Sun'. Acts 20:11 confirms that Paul departed at daybreak the next day. The clear implication is that, after observing the Sabbath then preaching on Saturday night, Paul's intention was to depart on Sunday morning - not to observe Sunday as a sabbath.
1 Corinthians 16:2-3 is not a reference to taking up a collection during a Sunday church service. Rather, the Corinthians were to _"put something aside and store it up",_ on the first day of the week. Putting something aside and *storing* it is not the same as bringing an offering to church for collection at a service. For Jews, taking up collections at a Sabbath service was (and still is) offensive.
The Apostle Paul - the apostle to the gentiles - consistently observed the Sabbath (Acts 13:14 & 42-44; 16:13; 17:1-2; 18:4-11). After 3 years before visiting Peter in Jerusalem (Galatians 1:18), a further 11 years’ Christian ministry before the Jerusalem Council (Galatians 2:1) and at least 11 years ministry after that (Acts 25:1), Paul declared:
_“Neither against the law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar have I offended at all”_ (Acts 25:8)
meaning _Paul had kept the Sabbath for at least 25 years as a Christian._ The claims some people make - to the effect that for all those years Paul _only_ attended synagogue for evangelistic purposes - simply aren't credible. Indeed, for at least one occasion (Acts 24:11-18), it contradicts Paul's own words.
Although Romans 14:5, Galatians 4:9-10 and Colossians 2:16-17 are often used to claim Sabbath observance has been abolished, the sabbath-observing Paul (Acts 25:8) wasn't even referring to Sabbath observance the first two of those passages:
• *Romans 14:5-6* concerns only whether one should fast on certain days, not whether one should observe the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a feast day, not a fast day;
• *Galatians 4:9-10* concerns only the observance of 'days, and months, and seasons, and years' associated with 'elemental spirits', which has nothing to do with the Sabbath;
• *Colossians 2:16-17* - which contains the only Sabbath reference in the entire Pauline corpus - and doesn't refer to _the_ Sabbath - concerns human traditions that are "not according to Christ" (cf. Colossians 2:8), which clearly does not apply to the institution of the Sabbath in Genesis 2:3. Moreover, the Greek noun σάββατον (sabbaton) translated as 'Sabbath' in some translations is plural (i.e. sabbaths, not _the_ Sabbath). Biblical Sabbaths included the first day Feast of Unleavened Bread (Numbers 18:17) - the day after Passover - and the Day of Atonement (cf. Leviticus 23:2-43). Note, too, that these _are_ a shadow of things to come, not _were_ a shadow of things past. In other words, they all remain in force for the present. Colossians 2:20-23 tells us that man-made rules about these things have _an appearance of wisdom but are of no value in checking the indulgence of the flesh._ What Colossians 2:8, 16-23 tells Christians is that they can safely ignore non-biblical sabbaths and extra-biblical sabbath rules; they are not told they can ignore the weekly Sabbath.
In Revelation 1:10, the reference to the Lord’s day does not necessarily mean Sunday. It at most means after the sabbath was over (e.g. Saturday night). It may also be just another way of saying 'the day of the Lord', which is how the ISV translates it. In any event, it is not described as a day on which believers had some kind of gathering; indeed, all it tells us is that John was 'in the spirit' on that day.
Although Jesus is often said to have broken the Sabbath (Matthew 12:2, Mark 2:24; Luke 6:1-2; John 5:16-18; 9:16), thereby abolishing it, what He in fact did was to: assert His authority over it (Matthew 12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5); restore its observance to its proper basis (Mark 2:27); and confirm the true scope of what could be done on that day (Matthew 12:10-12; Mark 3:3-5; Luke 6:6-10; 13:10-16; 14:1-6; John 5:2-19; 7:23, 9:1-34).
Note: The Greek text of Matthew 12:1 refers to _sabbaths,_ not to just a single sabbath. Luke 6:1-5 clarifies that the event took place during the multiple sabbaths of Passover, with the exchange ocurring on the first sabbath after the second day of the Passover (i.e. the first of the seven sabbaths counting from the second day of the Passover, which was itself a sabbath, until the feast of Pentecost).
Jesus said that something greater than the sabbath is here.
Never listen to a cessationist. They know men, not God.
I don't want to listen to anyone who denies the biblical work of the Holy Spirit, sorry. I.E. the gifts of the spirit, miracles, healings, tongues etc. Borderline blasphemy in my opinion.
We're called to test the spirits. The people who call themselves prophets in these days have many failed prophesies. The test for a prophet is that would have no failed prophesies. Speaking in tongues is supposed to be interpreted and yet we see people just babbling without interpretation. What we see today is not done in the way established by the Bible. Voddie Baucham isn't denying the Holy Spirit, he's denying the false teachers and false prophets.
@@robynb522 That is biblical and true but many want to deny that there are any prophets today. You can't have false without also having genuine. There are also apostles today, not just pastors and evangelists. According to the Word of God, the church is built on the foundation of apostle and prophet, with Jesus being the chief cornerstone, but many deny this.