Nowadays, the vanguard units will be Loitering surveillance drones, Remote or Autonomous swarm drone launch vehicles, remote or autonomous IFV robot with cannon, 155mm artillery, 250mm howitzer, drone bombers with soldiers in support role. Won't get to use their small arms if faced with 5th or below generation armies. 😂❤
does every ns man get a headset along with their helmet? if not there is no advantages to the high cut helmet (other than a little bit of more hearing) and a bigger disadvantage of much less protection on the side
@@EricK-mj7kr yes but i think that the only reason why SOFs use high cut helmets is for ear communication devices because they need it as special operations. Standard soldiers however i don’t think need it as much
@@lelbra SOFs don't stand around in fortified positions to get hit like infantry does. The only time they need armor is when they need to do assaults. The rest of the time they are supposed to be ghosts.
For the record, Colt IAR was adopted by USMC since 2010. Using COE rules, this rifle would already reached end of extended five year COE, so it's only new to us, in 2024.
Wrong gun. That's the M27 IAR, which is based on the HK416. Colt IAR was outright rejected for the M27 IAR. In fact, the Ultimax 100 had improvements made to challenge the M27 but even that lost too
@@Lavabird827 agree, USMC accepted M27 over Colt IAR6940. But both had their service history starting from 2010, and why SAF selected a rejected rifle?
@@Wanucho The M27 uses a short-stroke gas piston system, which is considered to be cleaner and more reliable than the direct impingement system used in the Colt IAR. I have two questions, why choose a rejected Colt IAR and why Ultimax 100 Mk9 or 8 not selected even though much were spent in R&D of the weapon, in other words even our own don't support local production, how do we expect it has a market internationally?
@@EricK-mj7kr @EricK-mj7kr maybe Singaporeans just don't like their eyeballs very much. In almost every US army live fire course I can find footage of the soldiers are wearing safety glasses. That goes for European armies too. Every former soldier I know that deployed to combat had glasses or goggles in combat. Every 3gun, 2gun, and IPSC shooter wears glasses. There are so many things that can hit you in the eye, in combat or at the range. Why be so stupid as to not protect them?
@@Skenderbeuismyhero As a ex-career soldier who trained with live rounds and live firing drills with armies from other countries including USMC, i am laughing at your comment
I was an Ultimate 100 (SAW) gunner in the army. I can easily hit the target 300 meters away (provided you can handle the rifle well); but don’t like the rifle too long, and the both sides exposed design of the entire barrel can easily burn your fingers if you are not careful. Don’t know this new rifle how much better vs the Ultimate 100 ?
Thank you for the experience 🔥
That indoor range looks so cool
I love how they shy away from showing the actual gun in her hands. Wonder why they don’t like that.
the colt lmg was designed in 1982 just like the ultimax
Already battle tested by a country with various climate zones as well as urban warfare.
Finally!!! Tat SAW100 is a pain in the ass .. heavy and long
calling ultimax 100 heavy is crazy, go work out bro😂
Singapore’s Gun Waifu IRL LOL
Ngl, Lisa is really fine 💯
Dawg 😭🙏
Pervy
She is pretty
There must be some reason why only sg and mexico have expressed interest in this.
Nowadays, the vanguard units will be Loitering surveillance drones, Remote or Autonomous swarm drone launch vehicles, remote or autonomous IFV robot with cannon, 155mm artillery, 250mm howitzer, drone bombers with soldiers in support role.
Won't get to use their small arms if faced with 5th or below generation armies.
😂❤
Where tf is Ultimax 100 MK8?
nvr bring commando Julian along
Very nice
Damn get you a girl like Lisa 🔥
does every ns man get a headset along with their helmet? if not there is no advantages to the high cut helmet (other than a little bit of more hearing) and a bigger disadvantage of much less protection on the side
i think it’s a range helmet only so no need for actual protection
Militaries worldwide are transitiining to this helmet design which originated from SOFs.
@@EricK-mj7kr yes but i think that the only reason why SOFs use high cut helmets is for ear communication devices because they need it as special operations. Standard soldiers however i don’t think need it as much
@@lelbra SOFs don't stand around in fortified positions to get hit like infantry does. The only time they need armor is when they need to do assaults. The rest of the time they are supposed to be ghosts.
lol “new” machine gun that thing is decades old lmao
They allow improper attire to shoot?
Sorry my cardigan slipped off lol
For the record, Colt IAR was adopted by USMC since 2010. Using COE rules, this rifle would already reached end of extended five year COE, so it's only new to us, in 2024.
Wrong gun. That's the M27 IAR, which is based on the HK416. Colt IAR was outright rejected for the M27 IAR. In fact, the Ultimax 100 had improvements made to challenge the M27 but even that lost too
@@Lavabird827 agree, USMC accepted M27 over Colt IAR6940. But both had their service history starting from 2010, and why SAF selected a rejected rifle?
@@fathnsonBecause the HK416 doesn't use the direct gas impingement system. It uses the reliable gas piston system.
@@Wanucho The M27 uses a short-stroke gas piston system, which is considered to be cleaner and more reliable than the direct impingement system used in the Colt IAR. I have two questions, why choose a rejected Colt IAR and why Ultimax 100 Mk9 or 8 not selected even though much were spent in R&D of the weapon, in other words even our own don't support local production, how do we expect it has a market internationally?
They made her wear a helmet but no safety glasses?!
Since when live firing wear safety glasses?
Since when the troops are issued safety glasses for firing? Its combat training, the glasses gets foggy & are useless.
@@EricK-mj7kr @EricK-mj7kr maybe Singaporeans just don't like their eyeballs very much. In almost every US army live fire course I can find footage of the soldiers are wearing safety glasses. That goes for European armies too. Every former soldier I know that deployed to combat had glasses or goggles in combat. Every 3gun, 2gun, and IPSC shooter wears glasses. There are so many things that can hit you in the eye, in combat or at the range. Why be so stupid as to not protect them?
@@Skenderbeuismyhero As a ex-career soldier who trained with live rounds and live firing drills with armies from other countries including USMC, i am laughing at your comment
@@blanklife Where'd you deploy?
That aint an lmg thats a glorified assualt rifle
I was an Ultimate 100 (SAW) gunner in the army. I can easily hit the target 300 meters away (provided you can handle the rifle well); but don’t like the rifle too long, and the both sides exposed design of the entire barrel can easily burn your fingers if you are not careful.
Don’t know this new rifle how much better vs the Ultimate 100 ?
Faster cyclic rate. Would be interesting to see how its accuracy compares to the U100 @ full auto.
This is just an M16 modified...the country gg backward....
If it works, it works. The AR15 platform is very popular because it just works. HK416, M4 are all based on the M16.