Thank you Anton! You have the rare gift of being able to explain things in an understandable manner. Unlike those who are out to prove that their vocabulary is larger than everyone else's!😊
I believe that is exactly what Anton has said in the past and probably in the future. The Universe is quite alive, always changing, always remarkable. Keep up the great work good sir.
Bonkers science again! I mean that in a good way. The intellectual effort, the technology behind the observations, the phenomena themselves...just bonkers. Thanks for yet another brilliant explanation, Anton.
7:56 I thought that was the case, much like a ball spins and air moves around it, however a black hole has enough spin to be seen for hundreds of lights years is amazing. Thanks for details Anton 👍👍
I think I'll place my bet on black holes usually being massive enough that the stabilizing effects of nearby objects is minimized once space becomes very very very curved, and spinning objects tend to wobble.... Magnetic 'snapping' would add to that instability, and wobbling in the spin would stress the magnetic lines.....
Definitely up to your usual standards. A neat video. It's going to fascinating to see what we get when they work out how angular momentum is conserved in all this. Thank you for your awesome work, Anton.
Makes me think of the Coronal Mass Ejections from the sun causing the Aurora Lights - now super size that from a black hole and just get out of the way.
It's awfully pleasant to think of this a week ago and to get the answer this soon. Thank you, Anton, for making the Universe a bit clearer every single day!
Great job, Anton. I follow you quite a bit. My adult son and I came to follow you independant of one another. Now together. We have fun talking about one thing is the other in cosmology. You, Nova, PBS with confidence. Others, carefully.
the fact that some impossible situation seems to often resolve themselves naturally by some unknown non obvious mechanisms makes me believe there's some underlying math and solutions to everything
I wonder if the surface of an event horizon acts like a sort of superliquid and that it can have multiple crossing spin angles that don't interfere with each other's flow. Like having both a north/south spin and having an east/west spin but because of the crazy quantum effects this somehow allows each spin while not interfering with each other. The surface of space is literally frame drug by the event horizon, space get's very wonky near them.
LOL. Nonsense, again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡ ] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these jets. They originate in the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web we are just now discovering. BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone utter this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡 🎪 BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽 BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂ See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
This video made me think of a question. The moment of inertia of an ordinary object is calculated using its mass and its distribution of mass. How do you calculate the moment of a inertia of a black hole? How do we know the distribution of mass?
I know you don't talk about politics Anton but perhaps you should mention how congress de funded the Chandra X Ray telescope. It's a very important telescope and it is being de funded at a critically important time in X Ray astronomy. The telescope is as important to astronomy as the other space based telescopes.
It’s just a waste to sacrifice a working spacecraft that is so relatively inexpensive. So much more value yet to be derived from money already spent. Makes no sense at all.
Seems as if they are starting to understand these crazy jets. Hope they crack it. You never know there could be some physics that we could use in amongst all the crazyness
Hello wonderful Anton, (my greeting back to you every video! 😂 I just purchased a pillow and racer back tank! I'm so excited to help support your family. ❤ Yay! But, I would love to have your name on it. 😊
Around a black hole is a "caul" or "cauldron" semi-halo or bubble. This halo is more or less one solid region and composed of materials most resistant to fusion.. The Caul is formed as material is pushed outside by the radiatiative pressure ("eddingtonization") as well as -frame dragging- frame kicking. The m,aterial would otherwise fall in as the friction causes its orbit to decay rapidly but it can't fall in closer as the inside of the bubble becomes this maximum radiative medium that acts as a cushioning substrate. In this region there is an effect going on somewhat analogous to distillation, where at specific regions quite specific atoms can persist for some time before fusing into another type of atom, producing a lot of istotope decay energy in the process. Clearly this region is extremely turbulent, but the turbulence is driven by coriolis cells that in turn form, tunnels that in an emergent organization funnel electrical charge heat away from the cauldron as a form of lightning. Around the equator there are very few such funnels, but 'upwards' towards the polar axiii these funnels resemble very long and relatively thin tornado-like structures that jump back and forth. If anough material is in the accretion disk, the cauldron forms a dam blocking more material falling in. This material WANTS to fall in as it quickly loses orbital momentum through friction, but instead it flows 'up' to the poles, in effect thicking the accretion pancake. These regions are constantly realigning according to electrical charge. At some point as sufficient material falls in, the Cauldron almost covers the actual black hole from sight - all you see is a rapidly rotating cloud - but in the polar regions there are two eyes where excess heat erupts as of geysering along the north and south axis. The rapid flips in directions of these jets ar causing by changing directions of infalling material feeding the accretion disk as well as electrical charge - there is some delay in the flow of electrical charge due to the size of these disks versus light lag, as well as twisting magnetic field lines. It is important to realize that the only marerial not contributing towards generating energy by fusion is the residual iron halo, in a state of superheated plasma, which in effect only sponges up energy - until the iron atoms basically completely decohere into unbound neutrons and protons. A very large part of the energy produced by the jets, at greater distances from the central black hole, is emitted by radioactive decay. The jets spew crazy istotopes up and down.
I have a great idea for a new episode. You should talk about the orbit of earth v solar system v galaxy. And talk about the counter clockwise of the planet and system v clockwise turn of the galaxy, and the planes of reference of each, the degrees they are off from one another. I thought that was fascinating, being able to visualize the different dimensions of movement and orbits. I’m sure the subscribers would love it!
The Chandra x-ray observatory is in serious danger of being cancelled if NASA gets the budget proposal cut of 70% for that mission. And there will not be a replacement for at least a decade. Sadly, the observatory has at least that much fuel and can probably last longer than that. But a 70% cut is the same as a 100% cut. At that amount they couldn't even run it in standby. They'd have no choice but to shut down and deorbit if possible so that they don't lose contact and land on a populated area.
It's part of why NASA pushes for the moon missions again. They kinda need the space fever again, for the sake of current and future missions. American politicians really need to be more influenced to focus on scientific research.
And more. While special relativity explains the huge amounts of energy produced, general relativity explains how the extreme conditions come to exist in the first place. The truly astonishing thing is how Einstein figured this stuff out, with only pencil and paper, while working on it in his spare time. Thought experiments and hand figured mathematics over a hundred years ago...
If nothing can escape a black hole, how is able to impart angular momentum to its jets and accretion disk? The universe has some crazy stuff in it. Thanks for explaining some of it to us, Anton!
Normal baryonic matter can't escape from within the event horizon, but the gravitational potential and magnetic field lines do. Magnetic field lines can capture and hold atomic particles, carrying them along as the black hole and it's magnetic lines rotate.
“Nothing can escape black hole” never sounded realistic, it’s too magical and it would mean that Universe should get sucked into them, not grow. Gathering and packing matter and energy and then ejecting it - makes more sense intuitively. It’s almost sounds like jet engines that propell our Universe forward, or stocks growing from the seed that bloom with galaxies.
@@T0mbuc3et Funny you say that when this is actually the case where I comprehended correctly and your phrase sounds stupid. You thought you gonna look smart for once? :D
I'm vaguely reminded of a garage door spring, an object under massive force, breaking and suddenly releasing all of its force out into two directions down either side of a shattered spring.
The braided hair is obviously getting stuck in the plughole. Obviously the black hole puts off the horrible job of removing it and then does it all in a hurry!
It's hard to imagine how the gravitational attraction of a black hole can exceed the centrifugal force when the hole is turning at nearly the speed of light.
This is too funny. I was just wondering if they could ever change rotation direction when you said they were looking at it. I assume that a merger of two would do it, but other planetary objects also change rotation over the eons, and a black hole was once a star, so I would assume that it did, but wasn’t sure.
So basically, like a piece of piezo quartz? The static molecules spinning in the quartz atoms create the energy to create the electrical(EM) output of piezo quartz when "snapped". Except on a colossal scale with black holes.
I have questions, they may seem dumb! Is a black hole a singularity? Does a singularity have poles? do these mass ejections have any Mass? if so doesn't a moving wavering pole mean torque has been applied in an uneven manner in a singularity ? Can someone answer these questions, I would be grateful
Although it's unlikely, here are my 2 cents. It's possible this effect is the result of an advanced Dyson Sphere variation which harnesses the energy of a black hole to create a star link expressway, in addition to this it could be used to disassemble a rivals star-link. This could be carried out from within an event horizon thus cloaking the device.
As is pointed out, when a massive object collapses down to the size of a black hole, the spin speed increases to conserve angular momentum. Since the spin can't exceed the speed of light, the excess energy has to go somewhere, so the laws of physics dump it in ways we don't yet understand. To para a phrase, the universe is probably under no obligation to do things in ways we can easily understand. Anyway for stellar size black holes at least, the dumping has to be so fast that the hysteresis effect keeps the dumping mechanism working longer than necessary to satisfy the light speed limit, and slows the spin to the observed speeds. Which does nothing to answer the question of what is the mechanism.
"Science" and Anton are coming around to the electric universe hypothesis. "Spinning magnetic lines", and "electromagnetic in nature". You've just described Berkling current 😂
That only happens on non-spherical objects and lopsided weight distribution. A black hole event horizon is a perfect sphere until it starts the merging process with another black hole.
If the centre is a singularity with no extent then how can it be said to spin? Anyway, the definition of a black hole is a region of spacetime from which light cannot escape.
My criticism is not toward Anton, but about physics videos in general. I really appreciate what Anton does with this informative channel. It seems that physics videos in general have too much "artist's depiction", "artist's rendition", simulated, cartoonified, unrealistic physics. I think that in a similar way to how Watson and Crick deduced the DNA double helix partly using just their imagination, regular everyday people like us can glean more info about how the world works if we are shown video with real-world realistic-looking physics, or if that's unavailable, then maybe some data charts and no video, and just Anton's already-great narration and explanation, but leave out the misleading inaccurate cartoons. This video has a mix of realistic and unrealistic imagery, so for an enthusiastic visually-thinking student, wrong visuals can make it hard to catch on to how cosmic phenomena really work.
Well, they kinda want to make the videos more interesting to look at, I don't see the problem as long as the information content is based on factual research
if a black hole jet prevents a star nursery from clumping with heat, the star formation is delayed until the jets reorientation leaves enough time for the cloud to cool again
the direction is determined by the speed of the mass in the center of the b hole , when spin slow the jet is wide , when spin fast the jet is norrow !!! Matter (light?)gets drawn to the b hole the matter follows around the equator first because thats the fastest part ,greatest atraction magnetically then are drawn in ,as all the masses bunch together they roll to the poles and then jetted out the poles because the gravity is lost by the bunched up matter moving iradically and roll off to the poles
The event horizon shrinks the faster a black hole spins. It has to. If a BH's event horizon ere to spin at the speed of light the singularity would be exposed. This cannot happen per the "Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis (qv)."
Arp was a decent observational astronomer, but a total kook when it came to the theoretical. Nobody with any understanding of how the universe actually works takes any of his concepts seriously.
I'm sure Anton is capable of making his own mind on Arp, Birkeland and Alfven without slinging around insults like "kook", which is abuse, not science.
1) I'm not commenting for Anton's sake. I'm sure he already knows the truth. It's the casual passersby seeing names like this for the first time that I am concerned about. 2) Sure, nobody likes it when someone they admire is disparaged, justifiably or not. Not least because it reflects back on them. This does not change the fact that Arp was a "renegade maverick" who vocally and stubbornly pushed explanations for things like quasars with concepts like intrinsic redshift that completely failed to hold up to scrutiny. 3) You are right that this is not science. This is science education. The actual science was settled decades ago when Arp's ideas were given a fair hearing, then rejected. Rejected by everyone except a small number of other maverick renegades and credulous laypeople, at least. 4) Arp, Alfven, Birkeland... These are all names of formerly respectable scientists who have contributed to our collective store of knowledge. Unfortunately they also all produced ideas that have been, wittingly or not, appropriated by pseudoscience promoters, and the only people who bandy them around nowadays are Electric Universe cosmolarpers.
In any other context, electromagnetic effects require relative motion between poles or points of charge. Doesn't the magnetic field of a black hole therefore imply internal structure? and doesn't internal structure contradict singularity theory?
Why does everyone persist in calling every part of a black hole the black hole? The spinning accretion disc is not the black hole. I really appreciate clarity.
Since a black hole's magnetic field produces its jets. There's only way I can see the jets changing their direction. If large amounts of material enter the accretion disc from a different direction. This might disrupt the magnetic field enough to change the direction of the jets.
Are the hydrogen jet's S curves of some of those galaxies related to Larmor frequency? And is it possible that whatever whimpers out in speed to be layed down as galactic arms? From atomic hydrogen to moleculer hydrogen in a garden sprinkler type of way? Hence galactic arms are part of an accretion disk? Is hydrogen dialectricly repelled by the counter sync due to small space capacitance pressure mediation. ➗ Analogy of galaxy with fermibubbles or magnet sideways on a ferrocell. Can galactic hydrogen jets paint the inside of fermibubbles?
I think that if a blackhole hit some sort of critical mass, the super compressed star within would explode, but it wouldnt delete the rest of the universe, it would simply create a new buble universe within the old pushing everything else away from its growth... like a bubble within our universe. Our entire universe, and the big bang we know, is the buble that formed within another larger universe. Black holes are black because the gravity of the super compressed Star within, is so great, the light doesn't escape, thus it appears black...
I would think that since the singularity is infinitely small and dense it should spin infinitely fast. But I truly don’t know how that would work it just seems like that should happen
Its the jets that produce spiral arms. Elliptical galaxies have there jets pointing perpendicular. Spirals longitudinal. More powerful jets give bar like structures when aimed longitudinally.. obvious really. In fact Sagittarius A* has been photographed aimed directly at us. So the bar of Milkyway should also be aimed at us
What contribution to black hole spin changes arises from collisions with other black holes of different spin axes? Could the change in jet direction indicate prior collision/absorption of other galaxies?
Is it possible distances calculated from redshift could be incorrect if light is travelling along gravitational waves instead of in a dead straight line meaning the distance the light travels is actually longer than the distance between objects?
Thank you Anton! You have the rare gift of being able to explain things in an understandable manner. Unlike those who are out to prove that their vocabulary is larger than everyone else's!😊
Jordan Peterson? Lol
@@John-v7x5vJordan Peterson is amazing and well worth listening to.
@@John-v7x5v Among others!🙄😕
@@John-v7x5v I hear he goes by Mrs Jordan Shapiro these days...
But many understand him, and he is massively popular. So it's a you problem.@@John-v7x5v
I believe that is exactly what Anton has said in the past and probably in the future.
The Universe is quite alive, always changing, always remarkable.
Keep up the great work good sir.
I❤that about his approach!
Bonkers science again! I mean that in a good way. The intellectual effort, the technology behind the observations, the phenomena themselves...just bonkers. Thanks for yet another brilliant explanation, Anton.
Yes, Anton explains the bonkers of it v well.
7:56 I thought that was the case, much like a ball spins and air moves around it, however a black hole has enough spin to be seen for hundreds of lights years is amazing. Thanks for details Anton 👍👍
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 🫡😊
May snapping magnetic fields be ever in your favor! ❤
We look forward to you and your colleagues' further research!
I think I'll place my bet on black holes usually being massive enough that the stabilizing effects of nearby objects is minimized once space becomes very very very curved, and spinning objects tend to wobble.... Magnetic 'snapping' would add to that instability, and wobbling in the spin would stress the magnetic lines.....
😅😅😢😂😂😂😅😅😂🎉😮😮😅😂😂😮😮😮😮😮😮😂😮😮🎉😢😂😮🎉😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮🎉😮😮😮😮😮🎉😮😮😮😮😮😮😅😅😂😅😅😅😅😅😮😮😂😂😮😅😂😂😅😅😂😂😮😮😮😅😢😮😮😅😅😮😅😅😅😮😅😮😅😮😢😅😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😮😮😮😅😅😮😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😮😮😅😮😮😅😮😮😮😮😅😮😅😅😮😮😮😅😢😅😮😮😮😅😅😮😅😅😅😮😮😮😮😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😢😮😅😮😮😮😅😅😮😮😅😅😅😅😅😢😅😮😮😮😮😮😅😮😮😅😅😅😮😅😮😅😮😅😂😅😮😮😮😅😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😮😮😮😅😮😮😮😅😅😅🎉😮😅😮😮😅😮😅😅😅😅😮😮😮😅😮😅😅😅🎉😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😂😅😮😮😅😮😮😂😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😅🎉😅😮😅😢😮😮😅😅😂😢😮😅😮😮😅😮😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😅😅😅😢😅😢😅😅😮😮😅😮😮😅😮😮😅😮😮😅😮😮😮😅😮😮😮😮😅😮😮😮😮😅😅😢😅😅😮😮😮😮😅😅😅😅😮😅😅😅😮😮😅😅😅😮😮😅😅😂😅😮😮😢😮😮😂😮😮😅😮😮😅😮😮🎉😮😅😮😮😮😅😮😮😮😢😮😮😮😮😅😮😮😅😮
You've got such great animations!
Excellent new information on black hole bowl movements!
That's insane. It's a turbine generator. On a galactic scale. If we could somehow harness that energy, the limit would no longer be the sky.
Bru... amazing stuff that I can wrap my brain around.
Where it builds up to a mental gamma ray burst
Definitely up to your usual standards. A neat video.
It's going to fascinating to see what we get when they work out how angular momentum is conserved in all this.
Thank you for your awesome work, Anton.
Angular momentum is always conserved.
So can we make a generator from a black hole?😮
@@skylark8828
Black and non binary homosexual transgender muslim hole
Thanks!
Makes me think of the Coronal Mass Ejections from the sun causing the Aurora Lights - now super size that from a black hole and just get out of the way.
It's awfully pleasant to think of this a week ago and to get the answer this soon. Thank you, Anton, for making the Universe a bit clearer every single day!
Thanks Anton great explanation👍
Brilliant episode!
It just makes you feel like a piece of lint on the back of a mite on the back of an elephant…
Thank You for all your Work!! I Love you for doing it!! also... I'm glad you aren't showing your microphone:):):)
Great job, Anton. I follow you quite a bit. My adult son and I came to follow you independant of one another. Now together. We have fun talking about one thing is the other in cosmology. You, Nova, PBS with confidence. Others, carefully.
After all this discussion of snapping magnetic fields, I hope you can soon find an animation that illustrates this hypothetical process.
,that is hearsay
Interesting, Good to hear we are making progress on the BH jets.
Very interesting, looking fwd to future installments on this.
Fascinating discoveries, great presentation, thanks 👍😊
the fact that some impossible situation seems to often resolve themselves naturally by some unknown non obvious mechanisms makes me believe there's some underlying math and solutions to everything
The spin of a black hole can change very quickly. All that is needed is a merger with another black hole.
Or anything else if it’s big enough.
I wonder if the surface of an event horizon acts like a sort of superliquid and that it can have multiple crossing spin angles that don't interfere with each other's flow. Like having both a north/south spin and having an east/west spin but because of the crazy quantum effects this somehow allows each spin while not interfering with each other. The surface of space is literally frame drug by the event horizon, space get's very wonky near them.
@@elinope4745following
LOL. Nonsense, again. It all confirms the Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory 🧲⚡ ] and hence why conventional astrophysicists are stumped...again. 🙃 We in the Plasma Cosmology community understand the origin and nature of these jets. They originate in the Birkeland currents/filaments of the Cosmic Web we are just now discovering.
BS counter #1] There is no such thing as magnetic lines!!!!!!!!!!‼ and therefore there is nothing to get 'twisted'!!!!!!!! The 'lines' are but our visual representation of mag fields. STOP USING AS A PHYSICAL PHENOMENON.!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone utter this is just showing their scientific ignorance. 🤡
🎪
BS counter #2] Mag fields can't SNAP!!!!!!!!!!!!‼ That's just more scientific ignorance. Geezus!!!!!!! 💩🚽
BS counter #3] Not that I support the existence of the phenomena which the lamestream science calls black holes, but since light and all EM radiation can't exit the event horizon there can't be any bilateral interaction between the BH and the accretion disc.‼ DONE with this theory/notion propounded by this video. But if there was a interaction that caused the BH to stop instantly it would shred/jettison the accretion disc. Has this ever been observed? NO!!!! Please put this fairy tale to rest. 🤦♂
See my expanded comments in Anton's previous videos. 🎩
@@elinope4745that's what I ponder
I wonder if some pulsars also change the directions of their beams. It would be interesting to find out.
This video made me think of a question. The moment of inertia of an ordinary object is calculated using its mass and its distribution of mass. How do you calculate the moment of a inertia of a black hole? How do we know the distribution of mass?
I know you don't talk about politics Anton but perhaps you should mention how congress de funded the Chandra X Ray telescope. It's a very important telescope and it is being de funded at a critically important time in X Ray astronomy. The telescope is as important to astronomy as the other space based telescopes.
It’s just a waste to sacrifice a working spacecraft that is so relatively inexpensive. So much more value yet to be derived from money already spent. Makes no sense at all.
@@ADHJkvsNgsMBbTQe Yep! That's like buying a Porche only to park it in the driveway and watch the elements rust it away!
Does that also solve the final parsec problem?
The magnetic lines that "snap" could be what is called birkeland currents, but on a galactic level.
Ahhh . Not allowed...contradicts the narrative...the gatekeepers don't allow that
Incredible that a supermassive blackhole could have such a strong effect that it might affect the fate of a whole galaxy.
Feels nice that people talk about what I do for a living :)
As a chemist it's not fair u guys get all the cool stuff
@@michaelmoran2125 as an engineer shit rolls downhill
As engineer, shit should roll up uphill as well.@@billynomates920
Sad we got to listen to hacks who make stuff up.
Or as Anton does, makes a claim then provides no evidence and says nothing new. @@michaelmoran2125
nice flex
Hello wonderful Anton 👋
Jets changing direction, sounds a lot like counter rotation of Birkeland Currents identified by Prof Don Scott from the E.U. WOW!
Lol no
@@KnightspaceORG Shit ! ... sorry.
ShhAhhh not allowed
It’s not, don’t need a scientist to tell you EU is just fucking wrong.
Seems as if they are starting to understand these crazy jets. Hope they crack it. You never know there could be some physics that we could use in amongst all the crazyness
Hello wonderful Anton, (my greeting back to you every video! 😂
I just purchased a pillow and racer back tank! I'm so excited to help support your family. ❤ Yay! But, I would love to have your name on it. 😊
Around a black hole is a "caul" or "cauldron" semi-halo or bubble. This halo is more or less one solid region and composed of materials most resistant to fusion.. The Caul is formed as material is pushed outside by the radiatiative pressure ("eddingtonization") as well as -frame dragging- frame kicking. The m,aterial would otherwise fall in as the friction causes its orbit to decay rapidly but it can't fall in closer as the inside of the bubble becomes this maximum radiative medium that acts as a cushioning substrate. In this region there is an effect going on somewhat analogous to distillation, where at specific regions quite specific atoms can persist for some time before fusing into another type of atom, producing a lot of istotope decay energy in the process. Clearly this region is extremely turbulent, but the turbulence is driven by coriolis cells that in turn form, tunnels that in an emergent organization funnel electrical charge heat away from the cauldron as a form of lightning. Around the equator there are very few such funnels, but 'upwards' towards the polar axiii these funnels resemble very long and relatively thin tornado-like structures that jump back and forth. If anough material is in the accretion disk, the cauldron forms a dam blocking more material falling in. This material WANTS to fall in as it quickly loses orbital momentum through friction, but instead it flows 'up' to the poles, in effect thicking the accretion pancake. These regions are constantly realigning according to electrical charge. At some point as sufficient material falls in, the Cauldron almost covers the actual black hole from sight - all you see is a rapidly rotating cloud - but in the polar regions there are two eyes where excess heat erupts as of geysering along the north and south axis. The rapid flips in directions of these jets ar causing by changing directions of infalling material feeding the accretion disk as well as electrical charge - there is some delay in the flow of electrical charge due to the size of these disks versus light lag, as well as twisting magnetic field lines. It is important to realize that the only marerial not contributing towards generating energy by fusion is the residual iron halo, in a state of superheated plasma, which in effect only sponges up energy - until the iron atoms basically completely decohere into unbound neutrons and protons. A very large part of the energy produced by the jets, at greater distances from the central black hole, is emitted by radioactive decay. The jets spew crazy istotopes up and down.
I have a great idea for a new episode. You should talk about the orbit of earth v solar system v galaxy. And talk about the counter clockwise of the planet and system v clockwise turn of the galaxy, and the planes of reference of each, the degrees they are off from one another. I thought that was fascinating, being able to visualize the different dimensions of movement and orbits. I’m sure the subscribers would love it!
That would honestly be a great episode! ❤
The Chandra x-ray observatory is in serious danger of being cancelled if NASA gets the budget proposal cut of 70% for that mission. And there will not be a replacement for at least a decade.
Sadly, the observatory has at least that much fuel and can probably last longer than that. But a 70% cut is the same as a 100% cut. At that amount they couldn't even run it in standby. They'd have no choice but to shut down and deorbit if possible so that they don't lose contact and land on a populated area.
It's part of why NASA pushes for the moon missions again. They kinda need the space fever again, for the sake of current and future missions.
American politicians really need to be more influenced to focus on scientific research.
Need money for hellhole uk. Raine.. 790 billuon
All this energy from E=mc2 🙂
And more. While special relativity explains the huge amounts of energy produced, general relativity explains how the extreme conditions come to exist in the first place. The truly astonishing thing is how Einstein figured this stuff out, with only pencil and paper, while working on it in his spare time. Thought experiments and hand figured mathematics over a hundred years ago...
No system may be perfectly contained
If nothing can escape a black hole, how is able to impart angular momentum to its jets and accretion disk?
The universe has some crazy stuff in it. Thanks for explaining some of it to us, Anton!
Normal baryonic matter can't escape from within the event horizon, but the gravitational potential and magnetic field lines do. Magnetic field lines can capture and hold atomic particles, carrying them along as the black hole and it's magnetic lines rotate.
@stargazer5784 blows my mind how they pull everything towards them, but at the same time they are evaporating
“Nothing can escape black hole” never sounded realistic, it’s too magical and it would mean that Universe should get sucked into them, not grow.
Gathering and packing matter and energy and then ejecting it - makes more sense intuitively.
It’s almost sounds like jet engines that propell our Universe forward, or stocks growing from the seed that bloom with galaxies.
@@BlackVirtuejust because you can’t comprehend it doesn’t make it unrealistic
@@T0mbuc3et Funny you say that when this is actually the case where I comprehended correctly and your phrase sounds stupid. You thought you gonna look smart for once? :D
These galactic forces are unimaginable.
I'm vaguely reminded of a garage door spring, an object under massive force, breaking and suddenly releasing all of its force out into two directions down either side of a shattered spring.
Getting close to 1.5 million, Anton..
thanks as always
Thank you
The braided hair is obviously getting stuck in the plughole. Obviously the black hole puts off the horrible job of removing it and then does it all in a hurry!
It's hard to imagine how the gravitational attraction of a black hole can exceed the centrifugal force when the hole is turning at nearly the speed of light.
QUESTION
Could it be calculated how much
thrust a black hole jet produces?
Spinning centrifuges the aether, aether enters at equator, & is pushed out at the poles. Orbiting centrifuges likewise.
This is too funny. I was just wondering if they could ever change rotation direction when you said they were looking at it. I assume that a merger of two would do it, but other planetary objects also change rotation over the eons, and a black hole was once a star, so I would assume that it did, but wasn’t sure.
I bet those jets taste great
sweet annihilation, I agree.
So basically, like a piece of piezo quartz? The static molecules spinning in the quartz atoms create the energy to create the electrical(EM) output of piezo quartz when "snapped". Except on a colossal scale with black holes.
I have questions, they may seem dumb!
Is a black hole a singularity?
Does a singularity have poles?
do these mass ejections have any Mass?
if so doesn't a moving wavering pole mean torque has been applied in an uneven manner in a singularity ?
Can someone answer these questions, I would be grateful
Although it's unlikely, here are my 2 cents.
It's possible this effect is the result of an advanced Dyson Sphere variation which harnesses the energy of a black hole to create a star link expressway, in addition to this it could be used to disassemble a rivals star-link. This could be carried out from within an event horizon thus cloaking the device.
You are an automatic thumbs up. Thanks eh.
Canadian, eh?
I wonder about the exact mechanism by which an electric field can effectively siphon rotational momentum. Fascinating...
As is pointed out, when a massive object collapses down to the size of a black hole, the spin speed increases to conserve angular momentum. Since the spin can't exceed the speed of light, the excess energy has to go somewhere, so the laws of physics dump it in ways we don't yet understand. To para a phrase, the universe is probably under no obligation to do things in ways we can easily understand. Anyway for stellar size black holes at least, the dumping has to be so fast that the hysteresis effect keeps the dumping mechanism working longer than necessary to satisfy the light speed limit, and slows the spin to the observed speeds. Which does nothing to answer the question of what is the mechanism.
"Science" and Anton are coming around to the electric universe hypothesis.
"Spinning magnetic lines", and "electromagnetic in nature".
You've just described Berkling current 😂
You just described why you’re on the spectrum
Didn't some astronaut discover that when you spend something in space it flips on its axis regularly? Wood spinning black holes not do the same?
That only happens on non-spherical objects and lopsided weight distribution.
A black hole event horizon is a perfect sphere until it starts the merging process with another black hole.
The more I learn the more I have to learn
Super interesting video, Anton. But I’m still, after all these years, having difficulty understanding how a region of spacetime can be spinning.
Well, mass spins. And black holes are just massive objects
If the centre is a singularity with no extent then how can it be said to spin? Anyway, the definition of a black hole is a region of spacetime from which light cannot escape.
Omg! I just waved back!
My criticism is not toward Anton, but about physics videos in general. I really appreciate what Anton does with this informative channel. It seems that physics videos in general have too much "artist's depiction", "artist's rendition", simulated, cartoonified, unrealistic physics. I think that in a similar way to how Watson and Crick deduced the DNA double helix partly using just their imagination, regular everyday people like us can glean more info about how the world works if we are shown video with real-world realistic-looking physics, or if that's unavailable, then maybe some data charts and no video, and just Anton's already-great narration and explanation, but leave out the misleading inaccurate cartoons. This video has a mix of realistic and unrealistic imagery, so for an enthusiastic visually-thinking student, wrong visuals can make it hard to catch on to how cosmic phenomena really work.
Well, they kinda want to make the videos more interesting to look at, I don't see the problem as long as the information content is based on factual research
The magnetic field rotating reminds me of the reversal of the magnetic field of the earth. Which happens in an not fully understood cycle as well.
I was thinking BH's might had a wobble in their spin, maybe when something big got sucked in, or just precession of the axis.
if a black hole jet prevents a star nursery from clumping with heat, the star formation is delayed until the jets reorientation leaves enough time for the cloud to cool again
I have a Grand Trine that includes the Galactic Center, as well as a loose Grand Trine that includes the Galactic Center.
the direction is determined by the speed of the mass in the center of the b hole , when spin slow the jet is wide , when spin fast the jet is norrow !!!
Matter (light?)gets drawn to the b hole the matter follows around the equator first because thats the fastest part ,greatest atraction magnetically then are drawn in ,as all the masses bunch together they roll to the poles and then jetted out the poles because the gravity is lost by the bunched up matter moving iradically and roll off to the poles
Another excellent video! Non video request I have been looking at the hoodie to buy but my size 3xlt is always out. Any chance you can get some made?
Interesting to consider a speed limit on spin.
The event horizon shrinks the faster a black hole spins. It has to. If a BH's event horizon ere to spin at the speed of light the singularity would be exposed. This cannot happen per the "Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis (qv)."
EDDYS AND JETS, STREAMS AND CURRENTS, IT'S ALL A CHURN, NO BANG NO FADE. No something from nothing. No center no edge.
Also, you should look into Halton Arp.
Arp was a decent observational astronomer, but a total kook when it came to the theoretical. Nobody with any understanding of how the universe actually works takes any of his concepts seriously.
I'm sure Anton is capable of making his own mind on Arp, Birkeland and Alfven without slinging around insults like "kook", which is abuse, not science.
1) I'm not commenting for Anton's sake. I'm sure he already knows the truth. It's the casual passersby seeing names like this for the first time that I am concerned about.
2) Sure, nobody likes it when someone they admire is disparaged, justifiably or not. Not least because it reflects back on them. This does not change the fact that Arp was a "renegade maverick" who vocally and stubbornly pushed explanations for things like quasars with concepts like intrinsic redshift that completely failed to hold up to scrutiny.
3) You are right that this is not science. This is science education. The actual science was settled decades ago when Arp's ideas were given a fair hearing, then rejected. Rejected by everyone except a small number of other maverick renegades and credulous laypeople, at least.
4) Arp, Alfven, Birkeland... These are all names of formerly respectable scientists who have contributed to our collective store of knowledge. Unfortunately they also all produced ideas that have been, wittingly or not, appropriated by pseudoscience promoters, and the only people who bandy them around nowadays are Electric Universe cosmolarpers.
@@benwatson8244it’s not abuse to call someone a kook lol
In any other context, electromagnetic effects require relative motion between poles or points of charge. Doesn't the magnetic field of a black hole therefore imply internal structure? and doesn't internal structure contradict singularity theory?
Why does everyone persist in calling every part of a black hole the black hole? The spinning accretion disc is not the black hole. I really appreciate clarity.
Everyone who?
Since a black hole's magnetic field produces its jets. There's only way I can see the jets changing their direction. If large amounts of material enter the accretion disc from a different direction. This might disrupt the magnetic field enough to change the direction of the jets.
Just like a spinning top, could it change orientation because it spun to slow?
Are the hydrogen jet's S curves of some of those galaxies related to Larmor frequency? And is it possible that whatever whimpers out in speed to be layed down as galactic arms? From atomic hydrogen to moleculer hydrogen in a garden sprinkler type of way? Hence galactic arms are part of an accretion disk? Is hydrogen dialectricly repelled by the counter sync due to small space capacitance pressure mediation. ➗ Analogy of galaxy with fermibubbles or magnet sideways on a ferrocell. Can galactic hydrogen jets paint the inside of fermibubbles?
My back hole jets are also known to destroy galaxies.
hahahahahahaha
I think that if a blackhole hit some sort of critical mass, the super compressed star within would explode, but it wouldnt delete the rest of the universe, it would simply create a new buble universe within the old pushing everything else away from its growth... like a bubble within our universe. Our entire universe, and the big bang we know, is the buble that formed within another larger universe.
Black holes are black because the gravity of the super compressed Star within, is so great, the light doesn't escape, thus it appears black...
It seems a bit obvious that they are pointing in a different direction now. Everything spins and has a procession.
At the speed of light, the black hole becomes antimatter, and all matter that falls in turns to pure energy.
I would think that since the singularity is infinitely small and dense it should spin infinitely fast. But I truly don’t know how that would work it just seems like that should happen
It cannot spin infinitely fast, since an object would have to spin infinitely fast before it became a black hole
The Jets still won't make the playoffs.
So basically Black holes have an inbuilt Relief Valve transferring some of the rotational energy into the jets, makes sense I suppose
Its the jets that produce spiral arms. Elliptical galaxies have there jets pointing perpendicular. Spirals longitudinal. More powerful jets give bar like structures when aimed longitudinally.. obvious really. In fact Sagittarius A* has been photographed aimed directly at us. So the bar of Milkyway should also be aimed at us
What contribution to black hole spin changes arises from collisions with other black holes of different spin axes? Could the change in jet direction indicate prior collision/absorption of other galaxies?
The universe is an incomprehensible chemical process. Both in life and in science.
That sounds like coronal holes and CME on the level of a black hole.
Likely the exact same mechanism.
Is it possible distances calculated from redshift could be incorrect if light is travelling along gravitational waves instead of in a dead straight line meaning the distance the light travels is actually longer than the distance between objects?
Is observing this having an effect on the outcome?
Intersecting magnetic radio images equalizing causes lagrange points in space. On a galactic level you call them black 🕳.
Don’t spinning magnets create electric currents?
The wild theory that stars and galaxies and clusters of galaxies are sentient becomes more believable to me every day!
How about the formation or existence of a Planck star, that could explain it
excellent outro .. 😢 Bill Anders
How much of this could be explained by orbital and galactic trajectories for these objects being more complex than expected, if anything?