Daniel Radcliffe Learning to Act on the Job
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 май 2020
- Daniel Radcliffe's rise to fame came at the very beginning of his career. We think he's doing pretty good for a kid who literally learned how to act on camera.
Want more Off Camera? offcamera.com
Watch full episodes on Netflix: www.netflix.com/title/80102549
The Off Camera Show is the RUclips channel for Off Camera with Sam Jones. Subscribe now to be updated on the latest videos: bit.ly/1K3VAC9
Get Social With Us:
On Facebook: theoffcamera...
On Twitter: / offcamerashow
On Instagram: / offcamerashow
On RUclips: / theoffcamerashow
Follow Sam Jones on Twitter: / samjones 
Развлечения
I will admit that I find a lot of the children’s acting in the first two HP films a bit, well, awkward. However, there was a simple line delivery of DR’s in the third film that really made me sit up and think, “Hey, this kid is really learning!” It’s when they are walking down the aisle on the train looking for an open compartment, and Harry says in response to Ron re: his blowing up Aunt Marge, “Actually, I was lucky not to be arrested!” I don’t know why, but that delivery was very natural and utterly believable, and really struck home with me how good he was getting.
That line is from prisoner of Azkaban and he was 13 in that movie. I love how he delivered that line too
Daniel Radcliffe is a guy who you could tell was getting better and better as the HP films went on. He was arguably the stiffest out him, Emma, and Rupert when they first started, but by the time they did the DH P1 and P2, you could tell there was a maturity to his acting performance.
I've watched a couple interviews with him. His parents seem cool and smart. Good job parents.
Every child actor must re-learn how to act if they are to continue to have a career as an adult. The old ways of getting by as a child actor no longer work as you mature. That's why you see so many struggle to make the transition. Once you lose that natural sense of play you're screwed without some tools of the trade.
Very true
True
But also, once you're an adult, you have to take roles of adult characters, which are far more nuanced than your typical kid in a film stumbling around bright eyed in every scene
Very true, that’s why I think it’s important for every actor to have training.
I love Dan but the interviewer is pathetic trying to kiss up to him and justify the fact the he sucked in the first films.
Lindsay Lohan in The Parent Trap,Linda Blair in The Exorcist, Anna Paquin in The piano, Liesel Pritzker in A Little Princess, Tatum O' Neal in Paper Moon, Kirsten Dunst in Interview With The Vampire or Brad Renfro in The Client... All those kids gave breathtaking performances as their first acting job.
This is very insightful! Also, I think he is fairly good! I mean come on, for a 12 year old with no real experience playing the lead character, he did it well. Of course, he made mistakes, but it doesn't make him bad! Not now, or in his childhood! That is how you learn. It is tough, I really started at 12 and knew nothing compared to what I know now! Acting is something you learn and get better with over time! Think about it, we would have never known him had he never played Harry. We wouldn't even know who he really is! So, people who hated on him, please think about that first!
That's a lot of exclamation marks used right there.
Well, he did have some experience, wasn't he David Copperfield in a movie or something?
Having said that, I loved him in the first movies, I thought he was very good. Harry wouldn't be the same without him.
My favorite celebrity. So humble and genuine
Dan played Harry Potter perfectly.
Well I’m definitely biased, but I thought he was great! Growing up with the films, I think the main thing was being able to relate to his character. Watching the films as an adult, I think the acting holds up. I remember reading a tidbit somewhere that he improvised one of the lines at the end of the second movie when Lucius says let’s hope mr. Potter will always be around to save the day, and Harry says don’t worry I will be. So I think it’s pretty cool that he was connecting with the character enough to inhabit it. And I think in the earlier films his young age really did lend a credibility to the experiences of the character. I think in the later films is when his job gets more difficult, but still I think he was Harry Potter. It never didn’t feel authentic. Maybe it was because that’s how we identified the actor, but I also think he was able to bring depth to the role
I love Dan but the interviewer is pathetic trying to kiss up to him and justify the fact the he sucked in the first films.
Lindsay Lohan in The Parent Trap,Linda Blair in The Exorcist, Anna Paquin in The piano, Liesel Pritzker in A Little Princess, Tatum O' Neal in Paper Moon, Kirsten Dunst in Interview With The Vampire or Brad Renfro in The Client... All those kids gave breathtaking performances as their first acting job.
I love this so much. So inspiring.
Am I the only one who loved their acting in the early films.
i would have thought, from his later performances on the potter series, that he had discovered this before. i just re watched order of the phoenix and he's really nuanced and moving in it. just shows how talented he is. also, by that time he was probably very in tune with the character
I love these interviews
It's sad that my favorite actor will probably never be on here....he does mainly stage acting
Such a genuine person. He did a terrific job playing Harry at just 12 guess he had luck with the genes
They were all lucky that the books came out then, they were a hit.
I love Dan but the interviewer is pathetic trying to kiss up to him and justify the fact the he sucked in the first films.
Lindsay Lohan in The Parent Trap,Linda Blair in The Exorcist, Anna Paquin in The piano, Liesel Pritzker in A Little Princess, Tatum O' Neal in Paper Moon, Kirsten Dunst in Interview With The Vampire or Brad Renfro in The Client... All those kids gave breathtaking performances as their first acting job.
@@latrolettteeeeeee cool
Wow
Why they so short
Sam Jones is just fantastic in every way
In UK English 'On the job' means on the toilet.. :D
Not surprising. He was just a kid when cast as Harry.
🙏😭🙈💌catno
First 🥰🥰
I see this on every video. What does being first to comment do for you? I'm genuinely curious 🤔
I love Dan but the interviewer is pathetic trying to kiss up to him and justify the fact the he sucked in the first films.
Lindsay Lohan in The Parent Trap,Linda Blair in The Exorcist, Anna Paquin in The piano, Liesel Pritzker in A Little Princess, Tatum O' Neal in Paper Moon, Kirsten Dunst in Interview With The Vampire or Brad Renfro in The Client... All those kids gave breathtaking performances as their first acting job.
Jodie Foster in Taxi Driver and Natalie Portman in Leon too
As bad as he was, nothing can beat how bad the Emma actress was. And she still is. What an overrated person.
Never heard such a pack of lies
@@BarbssNn she’s awful at acting...how can you not see that?
I don't think resentment in the room came from him 'being the kid from Harry Potter'. It was likely due to the inherent parental nepotism he brought with him...
What you mean?
Panos P. I think he’s referring to the fact that his parents were already in the business. Mom was an agent and Dad was set designer or something. I forget the specifics.
@@RyanAnthonyDigitalMedia Casting agent and literary agent.
@@OrganicActing that'll do it
Organic Acting well more than half of Hollywood got here they are because of Nepotism. So I’m really not surprised. He still worked hard tho to prove himself as a serious actor and your parents can’t help u with that.
I can assure you that you didn't learn to act on the job. Go watch those movies back as proof
You maybe are right. i dont know. So what do you suggest? Everyone must be adults and skilled at acting in order to act?
I dated a girl that forced me to watch all the Harry Potter movies because somewhere along the way I mentioned I had never seen one. We never made it to part two. Nothing against the movies, I just don't really "enjoy" the company of a broad.
Good. That's good.
Eh?
ok