So let me get this straight. The US constitution guarantees your rights, but they don't provide any recourse for when the government violates those rights? Not much of a 'guarantee' if you ask me.
The Supreme Court is acting in the interest of Project 2025. They took a hypothetical case from a woman who was thinking about starting a wedding website to help couples organize their events. This woman wanted to turn down business of gay couples. No case was filed in the courts, but The Supreme Court took up her cause and sided with her even though she did not have a business. This is from Project 2025 manifesto and even though the it was not public news arena the planning for Project 2025 was under way. The Supreme Court legislated law in this case based on hypothetical premises. The MAGA Supreme Court majority members are also members of the Heritage Foundation the birthplace of Project 2025.
Exactly. And the 🍊 🍕 💩 isn’t talking about policy because JD Vance, Peter Thiel, Kevin Roberts, and The Heritage Foundation have already put together policies in the aforementioned manifesto known as Project 2025. This is all manipulation from the bottom to the top.
"Test cases refer to legal actions brought with the intention of challenging or receiving clarification on a present law. The strategy usually involves creating a “controversy” to get into a court that otherwise would not lead to a legal action because courts must have an actual dispute to hear a case. Since the goal is to make a court rule on a particular issue, litigants must strategically choose the right case to bring with beneficial facts, location, and timing so that a court makes a ruling based on the issue brought by the litigants rather than on another issue. Litigants use test cases to get a favorable ruling by all levels of courts, but the practice most popularly has been used to get a ruling by the Supreme Court on an important issue. While used since the early history of the Supreme Court, test cases became a more popular tool in the civil rights cases of the late 19th and 20th centuries. These cases often are generated by non-profit organizations, businesses, or the government itself. Many of the most well-known cases in the history of the Supreme Court are test cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson, Korematsu v. U.S., Griswold v. Connecticut, and Brown v. Board of Education." -Legal Information Institute Cornell Law School
@@jeffgorgon5455 NPR: Designer in Supreme Court ruling cited client who denies making wedding site request. Lorie Smith at the time did not have a business, beside implicating a fake defendant who was unaware of his name being used. The Supreme Court legislated law bypassing the congress in making new law. when no grievance existed except in Lorie Smith's imagination.
Harry is so humble and wholesome. Thanks Harry! 💙🌊🇺🇸 I voted today in Texas. The lines were long, and I saw so many women! Let's go Harris/Walz and Allred.
I'm hoping democrats will pass term limits for the Supreme Court of 18 years that gets Thomas, Alito and Roberts gone and Kamala can pick 3 new Supremes.
The founders did not enumerate the powers that the SCOTUS uses today in any way, shape, or form - John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison actually set the precedent that gave us Judicial Review, and gave us the lopsided powers that the Supreme Court has today. These dominos started falling 200 years ago, Congress has consistently relinquished responsibilities over the centuries to both SCOTUS and the Office of President, and here we find ourselves with the loophole that the GOP exploited starting in 2016 - that a President who could stack the SCOTUS with hand picked yes-men gets everything he wants, because he can overrule anything Congress or the people wants to do to check his power as “unconstitutional” via his Court picks.
I can suggest a contender - the electoral system, combined with gerrymandering. It is what the republicans are 'gaming' to eek out wins despite losing the popular vote by pillions. And, if they were to succeed with their 'alternate slate of electors' scam, they could in principle win despite losing the popular vote by over 100 million
Hi, Harry! Thanks for the updates. I’m sick of this Extreme (6) Court! This corrupted court needs to be investigated fully. The DOJ better be on this, quietly holding investigations and grand jury hearings… This Extreme Court truly concerns me. Volunteer! Vote! 💙💙💙🇺🇸 Stay Informed and Involved! ✌️
The entire world should sue Bill Barr, Trump should have never been elected, that was 100% election fraud but to keep the peace the Dems did the decent thing
@@OneFingerYT BAM! For a guy that spends his spare time tying up women's lower torsos in knots & feigns being a musician, you have no business assuming that anyone's comment is beneath your self-assigned high intellect. (Showing off by posting videos can be benign or it can be a window into one's mind & soul.) Oddball.
I believe we should file a Class Action Lawsuit against SCOTUS for those that have been adversely affected but the dereliction of duty by SCOTUS rulings especially the families and mothers in states where they were forced to carry to full term or miscarried child none to have or be born with and pass away due to congenital defects!!!
Never thought I would say this, but I feel for Cohen. I believe he has tried to turn a new leaf and he’s getting screwed. First Amendment Rights are rights for all. He should be able to publish his book, no matter what it says.
@@BlindSquirrel425 they are against whatever Makes sense. They know well that Cohen told the truth on Condon so he went to jail for wrongdoing on His behalf. Therefore, IT is normal that Cohen sues Condon.
So they will win elections with massive donations from the rich. No, appointments are OK, but they should have term limits and most definitely have a written Code Of Ethics and a lower bar for impeachment.
@@Rook98766 No human is a "nothing," except a guy diagnosed by a 125-member committee of psychiatrists as: a pathological liar/crime syndicate boss/perpetual thief/psychopath living on borrowed time. (Kinda' like a Hitler or Stalin, but a contemporary 78-year-old "stable genius" & last child of a KKK member.)
This analysis is the best! It really spells out for us just how critical our governmental administrative structures agencies, bureaus etc. I’m proud to admit I am pro-government as long as it is continued democracy building efforts/jobs. 👍🏻
Wait, they didn’t take up Michael Cohen’s case?!?!? WOW. That should tell EVERYONE everything they need to know about this court and lack of justice for that horrid man…
How would there not be? Anything above warlords and communities of a few hundred requires administration. These people so opposed to the principles of governance that they want to make cities untenable are literal psychopaths.
Create a max age for Supreme Court Justices, 1 day older than the oldest one there...time will get the others soon. Now, as far as the ones who lied under oath or evidence was covered up, investigate, if true, impeach, try, convict, jail. If Equal Justice Under The Law was real, this would have already happened.
Thanks, Harry. The SCOTUS brush-away of this case seems positive. It sends a message, I hope, that the "wreck the administrative state" crowd will settle back in their seats. At least for the next few minutes, anyway. I'm grateful for your translations of creepy legal manipulations. I hope you stay on the job well past election day. There are bound to be many more creepy challenges of the law coming at We-the-People in the days ahead.
1. So citizens in effect have no recourse for violations of their Constitional rights, while the Violater-in-chief is immune from prosecution. Nice. 2. We need a Bivens claim under the Second Amendment. That should tie their panties in a knot.
Thank you for simple, level-headed SCOTUS info as it happens. Way easier to hear what is going on then decide how I feel rather than filter 10 reports about the same thing then guessing.
They should decline all cases from now on. They have failed us miserably. They're supposed to make wrongs right, not the other way around. I can't forget when Colorado was trying to keep Trump off the ballot, Barrett said "There would be chaos" and I immediately responded "Well, Amy, what do you think we have now?"
Harry, I know I'm Australian and our legal system is Westminsterian....but I find your commentary and analysis so clear and interesting that I have to listen to it. Our High Court has none of the personal flims and flams of the SCOTUS judges. It amazes me how the American system operates at that highest of levels. Thanks for your great videos!
We have to win the Senate. Please American. Are rights are on the line. Not just the white house. Help ourselves. Take the Senate. Give Democrat a chance.
If citizens cannot seek redress in the courts for retaliations against citizens by the Government, what good are the courts? Might as well just close them to save money and let the Executive Branch do whatever it wants.
My jaw dislocating, which messes with ears and equilibrium highly effects my balance. There needs to be more training done on chronic illnesses and the like!
I don’t like Cohen, but the guy deserves the same rights and due process the people have. Justice for all, not what the Supreme Court’s say txting back and forth performing their morning essentials on the toilet.
Would be great if we could just talk about all this in person, but obviously they are having some control issues with their sick crimes having to come to an end. No more generational curses
I’ve also been pointing out many reasons this whole time why all other field sobriety test results are unreasonable! Not just for myself but for many others as well. They are not well trained in ADHD, which Id highly suggest they get trained on. I will gladly help come up with better tests, rules and regulations. I do believe that this is part of my purpose in this matter.
for that matter , why is only one certified person alone, allowed to test blood results for courts conviction? That to me is too much power for one person!
Everyone everywhere needs to vote straight blue ticket for the next decade at least. This exact post has now been deleted by utub 100+ times. Everyone everywhere needs to vote straight blue ticket for the next decade at least. 🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
@Hadenufyet Utub would have to agree with the troll that the post violated the rules in some way. You have now seen the post, does it violate any such rules?
How can the courts include a right to claim presumably based on its merits and then decline to acknowledge the right based on a arbitrary decision to decline any further cases without any review of the merits. Seems like arbitrary justice to me unless we’re missing something here in the analysis.
No. That is incorrect. Your statement is incorrect. Justice Sotomayor sided WITH THE PEOPLE to UPHOLD THE “CHEVRON DEFERENCE DOCTRINE”, which PROTECTED PEOPLE FROM CORPORATE POLLUTION AND CORPORATE GREED THAT HARMS CITIZENS! The Chevron Deference Doctrine is a GOOD thing! It refers courts to experts for safety in food, air, water, automotive, all transportation, banking, medical, environmental, all consumer products, including toys…literally everything! This corrupted (6) extreme court sided with BIG CORPORATIONS TO GUT SAFETY REGULATIONS!!! They (6) overturned a 70 year precedent! Justice Sotomayor was CORRECT!!! She is fighting FOR us! 🇺🇸✌️
How will history accommodate social media and failed influencers like trump ? They have to be ‘recorded’, but which snippets do you save ? Mayor McNugget ?
I have no faith in the Supreme Court at all.
Me either 🤬🤬
All Corrupt at least 6 maybe more
@@debibelden906There are six Republican Justices currently in the Supreme Court. That’s all your corruption in a nutshel!
SCOTUS should not be allowed to protect corrupt politicians like trump and barr! VOTE 💙….this court needs some serious reform!
Sorry but voting will not change the already corrupt Supreme Court. Those satanic guys are there for life.
So let me get this straight. The US constitution guarantees your rights, but they don't provide any recourse for when the government violates those rights?
Not much of a 'guarantee' if you ask me.
Reform the court!
The 2nd amendment is to protect the 1st amendment.
However, convicted felons like Trump get crowned by the Supreme Court so that they are above the law.
@@shovex -- No, it's to protect the entire document and all of the amendments.
@@shovexYall love yelling that and have only tried it once. We see how that turned out
The Supreme Court is acting in the interest of Project 2025. They took a hypothetical case from a woman who was thinking about starting a wedding website to help couples organize their events. This woman wanted to turn down business of gay couples. No case was filed in the courts, but The Supreme Court took up her cause and sided with her even though she did not have a business. This is from Project 2025 manifesto and even though the it was not public news arena the planning for Project 2025 was under way. The Supreme Court legislated law in this case based on hypothetical premises. The MAGA Supreme Court majority members are also members of the Heritage Foundation the birthplace of Project 2025.
We need to vote for Democracy and get rid of the corrupt Thomas Court, starting with Chief Justice Roberts.
Exactly. And the 🍊 🍕 💩 isn’t talking about policy because JD Vance, Peter Thiel, Kevin Roberts, and The Heritage Foundation have already put together policies in the aforementioned manifesto known as Project 2025. This is all manipulation from the bottom to the top.
"Test cases refer to legal actions brought with the intention of challenging or receiving clarification on a present law. The strategy usually involves creating a “controversy” to get into a court that otherwise would not lead to a legal action because courts must have an actual dispute to hear a case. Since the goal is to make a court rule on a particular issue, litigants must strategically choose the right case to bring with beneficial facts, location, and timing so that a court makes a ruling based on the issue brought by the litigants rather than on another issue.
Litigants use test cases to get a favorable ruling by all levels of courts, but the practice most popularly has been used to get a ruling by the Supreme Court on an important issue. While used since the early history of the Supreme Court, test cases became a more popular tool in the civil rights cases of the late 19th and 20th centuries. These cases often are generated by non-profit organizations, businesses, or the government itself. Many of the most well-known cases in the history of the Supreme Court are test cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson, Korematsu v. U.S., Griswold v. Connecticut, and Brown v. Board of Education."
-Legal Information Institute Cornell Law School
@@jeffgorgon5455 NPR: Designer in Supreme Court ruling cited client who denies making wedding site request. Lorie Smith at the time did not have a business, beside implicating a fake defendant who was unaware of his name being used. The Supreme Court legislated law bypassing the congress in making new law. when no grievance existed except in Lorie Smith's imagination.
@@jeffgorgon5455 Democracy Now: Is Supreme Court's "gay Wedding" Case Built on a lie".
Harry is so humble and wholesome. Thanks Harry! 💙🌊🇺🇸 I voted today in Texas. The lines were long, and I saw so many women! Let's go Harris/Walz and Allred.
I have voted too with my friends and family blue to defeat the felon in November 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 from Texas 2024
Yippee! Thank you for voting!
Me too! Colin Allred is a good man. Fingers crossed 🤞 💙
Me too, blue up and down the ballot 💙 My husband did as well. Go, Colin Allred!
I was there early voting in TX as well! All BLUE 💙!
I'm hoping democrats will pass term limits for the Supreme Court of 18 years that gets Thomas, Alito and Roberts gone and Kamala can pick 3 new Supremes.
That would be more than reasonable!
And they will "TRY" to declare it unconstitutional.
Supreme Court would have to pass that! Lol talk about collusion at it's best
Can they retract their rule that a president is allowed to do anything in official capacity and not be held liable/charged in court?😁
In my opinion , scotus disgracefully acting as Trump's legal defense team. Utterly disgusting.
Supreme Scrotum.
It’s become clear that the Founding Founders weakest link for us is scotus
The founders did not enumerate the powers that the SCOTUS uses today in any way, shape, or form - John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison actually set the precedent that gave us Judicial Review, and gave us the lopsided powers that the Supreme Court has today. These dominos started falling 200 years ago, Congress has consistently relinquished responsibilities over the centuries to both SCOTUS and the Office of President, and here we find ourselves with the loophole that the GOP exploited starting in 2016 - that a President who could stack the SCOTUS with hand picked yes-men gets everything he wants, because he can overrule anything Congress or the people wants to do to check his power as “unconstitutional” via his Court picks.
I can suggest a contender - the electoral system, combined with gerrymandering. It is what the republicans are 'gaming' to eek out wins despite losing the popular vote by pillions. And, if they were to succeed with their 'alternate slate of electors' scam, they could in principle win despite losing the popular vote by over 100 million
They assumed the courts would be "HONEST"
Hi, Harry! Thanks for the updates.
I’m sick of this Extreme (6) Court! This corrupted court needs to be investigated fully. The DOJ better be on this, quietly holding investigations and grand jury hearings…
This Extreme Court truly concerns me.
Volunteer!
Vote! 💙💙💙🇺🇸
Stay Informed and Involved! ✌️
the unsupreme court full of six questionable nominees
Magas love the s court
I’m sorry about that for Michael Cohen. It’s a horrible Supreme Court! Vote Blue…all the way💙
Michael should sue Bill Barr!
And Donald Trump! He is the one who told Barr to do it! In solitary confinement for writing the TRUTH about TRUMP
This video is about SCOTUS saying he cannot sue Bill Barr among others so no, he cannot sue Bill Barr.
The entire world should sue Bill Barr, Trump should have never been elected, that was 100% election fraud but to keep the peace the Dems did the decent thing
When was the last time they made a decision that benefits WE citizens ?
When's the last time you paid attention?
@@OneFingerYT BAM! For a guy that spends his spare time tying up women's lower torsos in knots & feigns being a musician, you have no business assuming that anyone's comment is beneath your self-assigned high intellect. (Showing off by posting videos can be benign or it can be a window into one's mind & soul.) Oddball.
The USS KANGAROO COURT has lost all credibility with the American people. Change is coming .
That "Kangaroo Court" comment has me "hopping mad" (dad joke!). But you R so right!!
@@ValuedTeamMember😅😂😅
I believe we should file a Class Action Lawsuit against SCOTUS for those that have been adversely affected but the dereliction of duty by SCOTUS rulings especially the families and mothers in states where they were forced to carry to full term or miscarried child none to have or be born with and pass away due to congenital defects!!!
They are DIRECTLY responsible for those deaths. They should be facing prison IMHO.
I am in! What is going on in America??
Thanks for ripping the curtain from the supreme court
If you aren't already listening to the Strict Scrutiny podcast then it's worth finding. It's a deeper look at everything the Supreme Court is doing.
The Obscene Court of Unindicted Criminals needs tossed out.
Never thought I would say this, but I feel for Cohen. I believe he has tried to turn a new leaf and he’s getting screwed. First Amendment Rights are rights for all. He should be able to publish his book, no matter what it says.
Boy, I can’t believe Cohen is being treated this way. This court. 🤮
@@BlindSquirrel425 they are against whatever Makes sense. They know well that Cohen told the truth on Condon so he went to jail for wrongdoing on His behalf. Therefore, IT is normal that Cohen sues Condon.
Thank you, Harry, for keeping us informed. You are excellent at your work.
SCOTUS is a disgusting mess right now. This is why supreme court needs to be an elected position. Appointments can be bought.
So they will win elections with massive donations from the rich. No, appointments are OK, but they should have term limits and most definitely have a written Code Of Ethics and a lower bar for impeachment.
Elected positions can be bought too… just look at the congress
Bummer. Sorry, Mike. Thanks for the update, Harry. Take care, keep safe.
That’s BS that a civilian can have that much pull to put someone in prison on a bogus charge.
Micheal gets screwed again.. dammit!
He is nothing Been in jal
@@Rook98766 No human is a "nothing," except a guy diagnosed by a 125-member committee of psychiatrists as: a pathological liar/crime syndicate boss/perpetual thief/psychopath living on borrowed time. (Kinda' like a Hitler or Stalin, but a contemporary 78-year-old "stable genius" & last child of a KKK member.)
Thanks for your concise and complete reports, Harry!
Thanks Harry. Judicial life seems so much simpler in Australia!
Love you Harry!!!! Thanks for clearing these things up
Great catch, Harry, you're the best!!!
Thank you for the info!! you are awesome
👋🏻 Harry! Thanks for all you do to keep us in the loop & informed.
TY Harry.
🗳️🗳️🗳️🗳️🗳️🗳️🗳️🇺🇸ITS NEVER BEEN MORE IMPORTANT
This analysis is the best! It really spells out for us just how critical our governmental administrative structures agencies, bureaus etc. I’m proud to admit I am pro-government as long as it is continued democracy building efforts/jobs. 👍🏻
Terrible fo COHEN 😢😮
And for democracy and having an impartial supreme court.
Thank you Harry.
Bivens? Unbelievable. the king imprisoned his enemy! what? no recourse? That's something!
This is very important coverage. Thanks Harry
Mikey went to jail
@@Rook98766 Do you know that the same offense was committed many, many times by a former president?!! True.
SCOTUS is just waiting to see who the executive will be to decide on that agency case.
Yup- If the former guy wins they will do everything they can to make him a monarch.
@@consentofthegoverned5145 Whatever the legal machinations, such foolishness never pans out well in the affairs of mankind.
Thanks Harry💙
I hope he writes and tells it all and publishes publishes publishes it loud and clear!
Wait, they didn’t take up Michael Cohen’s case?!?!? WOW. That should tell EVERYONE everything they need to know about this court and lack of justice for that horrid man…
Horrid man being DJT, not MC. Just to be clear.
@@deborahmoore2801 nah, I ADORE MC.
Harry, your honesty is appreciated when you said there is an "administrative state."
How would there not be? Anything above warlords and communities of a few hundred requires administration.
These people so opposed to the principles of governance that they want to make cities untenable are literal psychopaths.
Thank you for sharing!! Too bad about Cohen, but glad they denied the other one! We the People live to administer another day more
What happened to Micheal was just awful, unacceptable.
Good glad go trump
What have these goofballs done to screw people this time?
Hi Harry,I missed you thanks for keeping us informed 👣👣👣💙💙💞😚
Create a max age for Supreme Court Justices, 1 day older than the oldest one there...time will get the others soon. Now, as far as the ones who lied under oath or evidence was covered up, investigate, if true, impeach, try, convict, jail. If Equal Justice Under The Law was real, this would have already happened.
Thanks, Harry. The SCOTUS brush-away of this case seems positive. It sends a message, I hope, that the "wreck the administrative state" crowd will settle back in their seats. At least for the next few minutes, anyway.
I'm grateful for your translations of creepy legal manipulations. I hope you stay on the job well past election day. There are bound to be many more creepy challenges of the law coming at We-the-People in the days ahead.
SCOTUS sucks
Can Michael Cohen start a new case on different grounds?
They should take Cohen’s case!
IT seems like they only accept Maga cases. They don't want to help individuals that are in need of good decisions relative to the constitution.
Hello no
If people keep going aftger trump want win Mikey can't winning trump beating harris kam harry
@@Rook98766 What did you just ingest to make you write such litter?! There are lots of NA groups out there.
PLZ VOTE BLUE !! SCOTUS needs to answer for their crimes.
They have last word not u
S court has last word no u people
Thanks, Harry
Superb explanation, albeit horrible news for MC. Thank you
1. So citizens in effect have no recourse for violations of their Constitional rights, while the Violater-in-chief is immune from prosecution. Nice. 2. We need a Bivens claim under the Second Amendment. That should tie their panties in a knot.
Great update, thank you.
Thank you for simple, level-headed SCOTUS info as it happens. Way easier to hear what is going on then decide how I feel rather than filter 10 reports about the same thing then guessing.
Leonard leo really does make these guys feel like they are gods on Olympus! They are not!!
I'm going to mail my ballot in
Poor Cohen! Are there any other avenues available to him? This is some BS
thanks harry
They should decline all cases from now on. They have failed us miserably. They're supposed to make wrongs right, not the other way around. I can't forget when Colorado was trying to keep Trump off the ballot, Barrett said "There would be chaos" and I immediately responded "Well, Amy, what do you think we have now?"
Mr Litman, You are my number one trusted and most listened to Social Media legal commentator and I am subscribed to all the other ones too lol
And just where in the constitution does it say they can pick and choose what they want to rule on?
Vote.
SCOTUS is starting to "read the room " - Trump/Vance in for a serious thumping this election. VOTE, VOTE, VOTE BLUE FOR DEMOCRACY AND AMERICA 🇺🇸 💙 👏 👍
Trump winning thank u alvin
Harry, I know I'm Australian and our legal system is Westminsterian....but I find your commentary and analysis so clear and interesting that I have to listen to it. Our High Court has none of the personal flims and flams of the SCOTUS judges. It amazes me how the American system operates at that highest of levels.
Thanks for your great videos!
I think you meant to say two cases that dont personally benefit Opus dei or the COUP efforts...
We have to win the Senate. Please American. Are rights are on the line. Not just the white house. Help ourselves. Take the Senate. Give Democrat a chance.
No honey tgey said republicans winning the. Senate 4 extra r getting it
If citizens cannot seek redress in the courts for retaliations against citizens by the Government, what good are the courts? Might as well just close them to save money and let the Executive Branch do whatever it wants.
Bivens has left the room. Bummer.
My jaw dislocating, which messes with ears and equilibrium highly effects my balance. There needs to be more training done on chronic illnesses and the like!
I don’t like Cohen, but the guy deserves the same rights and due process the people have. Justice for all, not what the Supreme Court’s say txting back and forth performing their morning essentials on the toilet.
Trump diverse his rights to thank u alvin an going afther trump u all put him in for preisdent an fani
@@Rook98766 I recognize that statement!! Donald said it 2 days ago. I thought you might be plagiarizing Donald. I was right!! U rascal.
So this means the President still cannot fire the Postmaster General. Terrific win for the trump cult.
The board can fire him, and I don’t understand why this wasn’t done already!
@@joanfregapane8683 It wasn't done because trump appointed the majority of the board.
Thank you.
I’m sure they’re very sensitive to who has standing after being caught taking cases where parties had none
Shocking that the president can just order someone held in solitary confinement.
DonaldJPutin
@@j.mygrant3752 yes if ever was a case for the Supreme Court to take up would be this astounding abuse of power
Would be great if we could just talk about all this in person, but obviously they are having some control issues with their sick crimes having to come to an end. No more generational curses
Poor cohen. Terrible.
I’ve also been pointing out many reasons this whole time why all other field sobriety test results are unreasonable! Not just for myself but for many others as well. They are not well trained in ADHD, which Id highly suggest they get trained on. I will gladly help come up with better tests, rules and regulations. I do believe that this is part of my purpose in this matter.
for that matter , why is only one certified person alone, allowed to test blood results for courts conviction? That to me is too much power for one person!
@@as3346 they do have to get a warrant for it and give you a receipt for it, but it’s all still bogus
Thank you
SCOTUS is a joke these days. A bad joke.
They word they have not mikey
Love seeing u all complaiming
Supreme Court needs to get brought down🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Can you give us examples of the agency names? Education, HHS, etc.
Well the damage is done
SICKENING
Everyone everywhere needs to vote straight blue ticket for the next decade at least. This exact post has now been deleted by utub 100+ times. Everyone everywhere needs to vote straight blue ticket for the next decade at least. 🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
By YT or by trolls
@Hadenufyet Utub would have to agree with the troll that the post violated the rules in some way. You have now seen the post, does it violate any such rules?
@@Hadenufyet Careful. There very well might be an afterlife. If there is, you may be in for.......
How can the courts include a right to claim presumably based on its merits and then decline to acknowledge the right based on a arbitrary decision to decline any further cases without any review of the merits. Seems like arbitrary justice to me unless we’re missing something here in the analysis.
Excepting that judge Sotomayor sided with Chevron and against the people‼️🔥‼️
No. That is incorrect. Your statement is incorrect. Justice Sotomayor sided WITH THE PEOPLE to UPHOLD THE “CHEVRON DEFERENCE DOCTRINE”, which PROTECTED PEOPLE FROM CORPORATE POLLUTION AND CORPORATE GREED THAT HARMS CITIZENS!
The Chevron Deference Doctrine is a GOOD thing! It refers courts to experts for safety in food, air, water, automotive, all transportation, banking, medical, environmental, all consumer products, including toys…literally everything!
This corrupted (6) extreme court sided with BIG CORPORATIONS TO GUT SAFETY REGULATIONS!!!
They (6) overturned a 70 year precedent!
Justice Sotomayor was CORRECT!!!
She is fighting FOR us! 🇺🇸✌️
Ridiculous
Hi Harry.
HARRY!!!
Speaking of evidence…. My blood test results they were using have an expiration date and it’s past that date so we should be able to drop that charge.
How will history accommodate social media and failed influencers like trump ? They have to be ‘recorded’, but which snippets do you save ?
Mayor McNugget ?
The mega S. Court wants to pick and choose. Let them pick their noses. I'm sure some of them can find something to do with that!
Honey the magas r winning trump beating how how harris
💙🇺🇸👍
"an earlier more active court" should be "more Positively active." This court is quite active in a negative direction.
SCOTUS is right:Congress has to LEGISLATE,as per Constitution 📜🇺🇸🗽⚖️
'Decline {not} to take case'??
SC(R)OTUS needs a shake-up.
They r they voteing trump in overtuneing his conviction but trump is beat harris anyvway
Oh this isn’t good?