Why Books Are More Powerful Than Movies

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @mikedavidson6413
    @mikedavidson6413 2 года назад +5

    Great video! I think a lot of us who still like to read books feel the same: no matter how good other forms of media become, there is no substitute for the power of human imagination, and that’s where books have the edge.

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  2 года назад +1

      That's it. Thanks for your feedback Mike!

  • @cedricmoulin
    @cedricmoulin 2 года назад +5

    Totalement d'accord ! La lecture d'un texte engendre une profusion d'images mentales alors que le visionnage d'un film ne mobilise pas l'imagination.

  • @saravanandilip7907
    @saravanandilip7907 Год назад +1

    the video was soothing and poetic

  • @antonhylewis80
    @antonhylewis80 2 года назад +3

    I realy love the fact that the books you used in your video was tolkien's !

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  2 года назад +2

      Sure, and it's not the first nor the last to feature them ;)

  • @matheus5230
    @matheus5230 8 месяцев назад +1

    Hitchcock once said that he was not interested in adapting the great works of literature to film because what makes those works great often can’t be translated into such a radically different medium like cinema, not without a major loss. He said there was nothing he could hope to add to what was already written by Dostoievski in Crime And Punishment, for example.

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  8 месяцев назад

      Oh yes that's absolutely true. I didn't know Hitchcock said that, but that doesn't surprise me from so great a mind. Crime and Punishment is one of the most accomplished books in all-time literature. For sure it's just impossible to add or improve anything in it.
      Thanks for your great feedback.

    • @matheus5230
      @matheus5230 8 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@AgeofInkIndeed!
      Happy you liked my comment.

  • @ulisesdemostenes7074
    @ulisesdemostenes7074 2 года назад +2

    What music did you put?

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  2 года назад +1

      Wagner opera, Parsifal

    • @ulisesdemostenes7074
      @ulisesdemostenes7074 2 года назад +1

      @@AgeofInk Thank you. ¿So, it is fair to assume you have a taste for classical music?

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  2 года назад

      @@ulisesdemostenes7074 Absolutely!

  • @enyaratna
    @enyaratna 2 года назад +1

    Russian localization of Hobbit looks beyond amusing 😀

  • @Milianaire
    @Milianaire 2 года назад +2

    But what about audio books :) Pros and cons from movies and books. The books story but can be passively listened to depending on what it is, but nothing to feel in your hands and can be ruined by a bad narrator or made better.

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  2 года назад

      Excellent question that I totally overlooked. Need to include that in a sequel video! Thanks a lot

  • @cedricmoulin
    @cedricmoulin 2 года назад +1

    Aussi : seul ce qui est matérialisé reste. La pérennité est dans l'écrit ; les contenus numériques sont voués à disparaitre en raison de l'évolution des technologies, de l'obsolescent des formats et du fait qu'ils soient cachés, invisibles (les unités de stockage anciennes sont illisibles sur les machines actuelles, alors qu'on peut toujours lire un livre, même très ancien !)

    • @AgeofInk
      @AgeofInk  2 года назад

      Très bonne remarque Cédric, j'y penserai la prochaine fois. Le support physique et non numérique conserve bien des avantages...

  • @yuzu54o
    @yuzu54o 2 года назад +1

    Yes i love books since i read Harry Potter then after watch the first movie version i just dont want to watch it anymore 😂😂. They cutted so many scence and story behind make it not feel lively anymore.

  • @Hello_once_more
    @Hello_once_more 2 года назад

    How are they more powerful then hands, when you need those hands to write a book?