The Taliban Slaughtered One of The Callers To The Sunnah In Afghanistan

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
  • #Taliban #Afghanistan #Salafi
    ذبحت طالبان أحد دعاة السنة في أفغانستان
    The Taliban Slaughtered One of The Callers To The Sunnah In Afghanistan
    الشيخ خالد عثمان المصري
    Shaykh Khalid Uthman al-Misri

Комментарии • 163

  • @masseyenglish6328
    @masseyenglish6328 3 года назад +96

    I have a question, how do we know the Taliban murdered the Shaykh? They have publically denied involvement. Therefore, the burden of proof is upon whomever makes an accusation.

    • @atravellerindunya4433
      @atravellerindunya4433 3 года назад +14

      +M. S. Taliban are nothing but extremist deobandis. They have taken their principles from the khawarij. I don't know why would anyone in their right mind defend them.

    • @masseyenglish6328
      @masseyenglish6328 3 года назад +56

      @@atravellerindunya4433 Because even extremist deobandis are innocent until proven guilty.

    • @Salman_Tre
      @Salman_Tre 3 года назад +9

      @@atravellerindunya4433 proof ?

    • @salafguidance
      @salafguidance 3 года назад +16

      Family and the townspeople confirmed they took him.

    • @bachehqandari8033
      @bachehqandari8033 3 года назад +5

      Apparently the taliban came and took him to one of their posts. And after that he was announced dead. Allahu alaam

  • @abdulhadihust
    @abdulhadihust 2 года назад +12

    My brother's friend who was imam in a salafi masjid in Afghanistan has been killed by taliban recently.

  • @user-wf8nq7cm8t
    @user-wf8nq7cm8t 3 года назад +55

    Scholars and leaders of Salafiyyah must have talk with Taliban government especially scholars from Saudiyyah. May Allah protect us.

    • @daywalker0988
      @daywalker0988 3 года назад +13

      I feel like scholars from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and even Kurdistan would be able to make the most progress with them due to having regional similarities
      The more the better though, scholars from Saudi wield a lot of influence so all contributions are necessary

    • @hasibhabibollah7395
      @hasibhabibollah7395 3 года назад

      @@daywalker0988 InshAllah

    • @eltaahiras-salafi7958
      @eltaahiras-salafi7958 3 года назад +5

      Last meeting they had with a Salafi they cut his head off.

    • @Stahlhalter
      @Stahlhalter 2 года назад

      @@eltaahiras-salafi7958 smh when was this

    • @Emsyaz
      @Emsyaz 2 года назад +8

      @@eltaahiras-salafi7958 dont make claims without evidence.

  • @ThePr0gr4mm3r
    @ThePr0gr4mm3r 9 месяцев назад +3

    Isn't this critizing the ruler in public which makes you a mubtadi according to madkhalia? This is a geniune question.

  • @user-hm7nx7mo4x
    @user-hm7nx7mo4x 5 месяцев назад +2

    Madkhali sahawat finding a place with the international coalition🥰

  • @Abdul_Wakeel_Ghuraba
    @Abdul_Wakeel_Ghuraba 9 месяцев назад +4

    Why are you publicly speaking out against the rulers?

    • @salim4512
      @salim4512 7 месяцев назад

      Because they are deviants

  • @rathernot6660
    @rathernot6660 7 дней назад

    Afghanistan is not an Islamic state that follows Qur'an and Sunnah . It is a misguided Islamic state calling to the aqeedah of maturidi, the turuq of sufiyah (mostly naqshabandi) deobandi and are blind followers of imam Abu hanifa rhm in Fiqh only. The layman needs to understand this very clearly. IT IS NOT AN ISLAMIC STATE whereby it's rulers follow the aqeedah taught by Muhammad sallalahu alaihi wasallam and adopted by the sahaba. Those who are offended by this statement out of ta'asub towards the Taliban too bad, just suck it up.

  • @ibnjamil
    @ibnjamil 3 года назад +7

    السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.
    Are you going to translate the whole recording of Shaykh Khalid حفظه الله ?
    As it is only about 10 mins and it would be beneficial for the people in shaa Allah.

  • @karimtemri1664
    @karimtemri1664 3 года назад +16

    The same persecution against salafis has happened for decades in Uzbekistan Tajikistan and other ex soviet satellites. It's sad there are no viseos about that

  • @almijanmohammed3679
    @almijanmohammed3679 3 года назад +34

    Is it permissable to pubically speak out against them since they are now officially the rulers and leaders and its from the manhaj of ahlus sunnah was Salaf As Salih that they dont openly and publically critisize the rulers. This is a Qa'idah which has always been there and not just restricted to Saudi.

    • @eltaahiras-salafi7958
      @eltaahiras-salafi7958 3 года назад +12

      Taliban is a group not a ruler. If you said so and so who is the ruler than this is haram or so and so who is a minister.
      Taken from brother Nasir Alhanbali's response in comments:
      "No, The Rulers have never been a group. And the shaykh is speaking about their innovations and actions as they claim to be an Islamic Emirate and he didn’t mention a single ruler.
      As for hearing and obeying the ruler in that which is good from them then yes this is our Aqeedah.
      As for most people who claiming the Taliban are the rulers, then where were all these people before the Taliban came into power?!
      As for speaking about the innovations, or Kufr in Aqeedah of a group or the sins that are wide spread without speaking about the specific ruler or instigating against the ruler, then is allowed just as Imām Ahmad did with the Jahmiyyah…
      If the people don’t do that as the scholars say, then truth will be lost."
      Allah knows best.

    • @salafguidance
      @salafguidance 3 года назад +22

      Refuting taliban as a group and its ideology is definitely not criticising the ruler. Did Imam Ahmad stop his refutations against the Jahmiyyah when the ruler adopted the their stance and started to kill the scholars?

    • @almijanmohammed3679
      @almijanmohammed3679 3 года назад +22

      @@eltaahiras-salafi7958 use this same principle against Saudi

    • @Islam.is.the.truth..
      @Islam.is.the.truth.. 3 года назад +8

      @@almijanmohammed3679 that makes no sense saudi isn’t a religious group like the taliban though.

    • @eltaahiras-salafi7958
      @eltaahiras-salafi7958 3 года назад +8

      @@almijanmohammed3679 Is there a group in Saudi killing ahlul sunnah? Is there a group in Saudi going after the heads of our scholars like Sheikh Salih Al Fawzan?
      We condemn any group that goes against thr manhaj of ahlul sunnah wal jamaah but we will never rebel against the Muslim ruler even if he oppresses the people and takes their wealth.
      I thank Allah subhanahu wa tala that the rulers of Saudi Arabia have established Tawheed and Sunnah and have protected the lands of Makkah and Madina from the corrupt Ikhwani, Sufi, Shia, Khariji sickness and I thank the ruler of Saudi that they have locked up and prosecuted the likes of the Ikhwani callers Salman al Awda to rebellion and corruption of the Muslim ummah. Alhamdulillah.

  • @abunusaybah__
    @abunusaybah__ 2 года назад +3

    Is it not haram to publicly speak against the rulers?

  • @salamsweet2100
    @salamsweet2100 3 года назад +17

    Dear brothers is it true that taliban have banned salafis and ahlul hadith to preach Islam in Afghanistan? Any reliable source or just rumours? Barakallah fiqum

    • @Ahmed-lq3lx
      @Ahmed-lq3lx 3 года назад +7

      Yes brother that is true..!😕😓😷

    • @mrrayban4333
      @mrrayban4333 3 года назад +2

      SubhanAllah

    • @mkdon101
      @mkdon101 3 года назад +4

      Alhamdulillah it's true. Inshallah other nations will do same soon to

    • @adhurimuka
      @adhurimuka 3 года назад +31

      @@mkdon101 May Allah not bless you

    • @hammadnaeem2560
      @hammadnaeem2560 3 года назад +31

      @@mkdon101 have you studied the manhaj, i used to think strange of this manhaj as well but i was blessed with knowledge and i found this manhaj has the most evidences than all the rest, i advise you to do some research before talking ill about the salafis.

  • @iliasrahimi5227
    @iliasrahimi5227 4 месяца назад +2

    Please delete this video, He was not killed by the taliban but the former party mujahideen and gunned down by Hekmatyars man (who was a soviet ally and drug trafficker). This confusses people and bring fitnah. Please do good research before posting stuff like this. If you post Sheikh Ibn Baz, AlBani , Ruhayli, Fawzaan that is different. Who is this ignorant guy preaching. La hawla wa la quwatah illabillah

  • @خیرمحمدموحد
    @خیرمحمدموحد 5 месяцев назад

    لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله 🏴☝️

  • @94A4.GH01
    @94A4.GH01 Год назад +3

    Thats wrong. The salafis are with taliban. Sheikh abdul aziz nuristani al salafi joined Taliban with other 33 sheiks salafi that joined them

  • @mohammadiqbalshawl186
    @mohammadiqbalshawl186 3 года назад +6

    May be this a false news uS does not like their rule b coz they want to establish Shariah rule.

    • @ibshelby3643
      @ibshelby3643 Год назад

      you cant make sharia by destroying your country

  • @khalidzbaidi7142
    @khalidzbaidi7142 3 года назад +2

    لا حولا ولا قوة الا بالله العلي العظيم.
    و الله المستعان.

  • @number1gstar
    @number1gstar 3 года назад +17

    Akhi , I think the Taliban’s response to the Shiah population has been quite balanced. Before when they were in power, they unjustly killed many innocent shiah’s including women and children. Now they are trying to show that they are willing to cooperate as long as the Shiahs stay within limits. It’s all for uniting the Afghan population so they can all contribute to rebuilding Afghanistan. Afghanistan is extremely tribal so these things go a long way. They will deal with the Shias appropriately without conceding their beliefs. Allah knows best.

    • @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
      @falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 3 года назад +4

      shi'as were backed by iran, northern alliance made deals for opiates, shame, shi'a in afg & iraq worked with usa & fought Sunnis 1st. cia backed iran in 79 to be israelis hero after they lost sinai, Saudis booted al queda & iran original jet crashers took them in & follow kariji fayruz... shi'as to be condemned after they accept taliban if anything.

    • @ld3171
      @ld3171 2 года назад

      there is a difference of between being in the middle, which giving them their rights of life and so on, but you must not allow them to portray their shirk and bidah. Before, they were overly harsh, but now they are on the other side of the coin.

    • @sup7067
      @sup7067 2 года назад +6

      Killing them unjustly is haram, but allowing them to practice their shirk is also Haram

    • @dtl5623
      @dtl5623 Год назад +1

      I too believe that the Taliban is more balanced in their approach to the Shia this time around. That being said, if you give the Shia an inch they take a mile. They can not be allowed to gain an upper hand over ahlu-sunnah.
      The shia must NOT be allowed to publicly proselytise in Afghanistan. That being said, I don't think there is too much the state can do RE - what is taught inside the hawzas & individual Hussainiyahs.

    • @goshbaby8531
      @goshbaby8531 Год назад

      rather educate the ppl of bid'ah onto the right way

  • @AbuAmmar2012
    @AbuAmmar2012 3 года назад +10

    السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
    Is there any solid evidence to your claims?

    • @soheil527
      @soheil527 2 года назад

      exactly, it could have been a personal vendetta rather than a sectarian based murder. but Taliban is mostly sunni pathan , there are few other groups joining in the name of gaining freedom from outsiders

  • @islamicreminders327
    @islamicreminders327 2 года назад +1

    Do you know where I can get knowledgeable lectures like these I only speak English only

    • @cp3478
      @cp3478 2 года назад

      As salamu alaikum

    • @mujaahed
      @mujaahed 2 месяца назад

      Scholarly Subtitles and salaguidance are good to start off with

  • @aw1wcmvzc2l2zq2
    @aw1wcmvzc2l2zq2 2 года назад +4

    The grave worshippers are always allied, there is no big difference between the Taliban Sufis and Shia Rafidha

  • @خیرمحمدموحد
    @خیرمحمدموحد 5 месяцев назад

    السلام علیکم و رحمت الله و برکاته 🌹🏴

  • @wasiqhussain7712
    @wasiqhussain7712 Год назад +1

    i still don't understand why saudi scholars don't label them as khawarij. justk like they declared al qaida as one. taliban are clearly the khawarij

    • @rahimicrackz
      @rahimicrackz 2 месяца назад

      how does it describe to them ? Where is the Usool of khawarij and the fundaments

    • @mfahadfayt
      @mfahadfayt Месяц назад

      No they don't have clear proof

  • @SIGSEGV1337
    @SIGSEGV1337 3 года назад +16

    But akhi I thought you're not supposed to speak out against the Muslim ruler, wouldn't it be more correct to speak to them in private? They even have Twitter accounts you can talk to them on and advise them on this incident

    • @NasirAlHanbali
      @NasirAlHanbali  3 года назад +27

      No, The Rulers have never been a group. And the shaykh is speaking about their innovations and actions as they claim to be an Islamic Emirate and he didn’t mention a single ruler.
      As for hearing and obeying the ruler in that which is good from them then yes this is our Aqeedah.
      As for most people who claiming the Taliban are the rulers, then where were all these people before the Taliban came into power?!
      As for speaking about the innovations, or Kufr in Aqeedah of a group or the sins that are wide spread without speaking about the specific ruler or instigating against the ruler, then is allowed just as Imām Ahmad did with the Jahmiyyah…
      If the people don’t do that as the scholars say, then truth will be lost.

    • @SIGSEGV1337
      @SIGSEGV1337 3 года назад +28

      @@NasirAlHanbali How can the ruler not be a group? If you point to the ruling group you are still pointing to the ruler. It doesn't really matter where the were before, today the are the rulers, they conquered the land. Besides they even had salafis give bayah to them and fight in their ranks.
      I'm not saying you shouldn't speak about innovations, but aren't you supposed to do that without pointing at the ruler and saying 'they are guilty of such and such'?

    • @SIGSEGV1337
      @SIGSEGV1337 3 года назад +13

      @Sabir You can speak against the aqeeda of the deobandis without speaking about the rulers of Afghanistan no?

    • @sakibahmed8485
      @sakibahmed8485 3 года назад +7

      @@NasirAlHanbali well theres a clear cut double standard when it comes to saudi rulership and thier bidah and treachery and what have you then the principle of speaking ill against the rulers is abused. The taliban being a group doesnt take away the fact that they are in postion for rulership by the basis of sharia and the pk and saudi goverments have recongised them as legitmate regime and rulers. So why are you and this sheikh talking ill of muslim rulers which your own rulers accept? And lastly how did the saudi pact start? And in its second and third phase were they not a group to begin with?

    • @NasirAlHanbali
      @NasirAlHanbali  3 года назад +27

      There is no double standard, the scholars speak about evil, whether it takes place in Saudi or other than Saudi and that is a fact.
      As for the rulers from the Taliban, then they are the muslim rulers like any other Muslim ruler and we apply the Manhaj of the Salaf.
      However, their innovations and the innovations or evils about the group are still clarified without causing a revolt or a rebellion.

  • @islamicreminders327
    @islamicreminders327 2 года назад

    Ma sha Allah

  • @kaashee
    @kaashee 3 года назад +4

    This is a sign of a lot of evil coming to Afghanistan

    • @tuwaylubul_3ilm
      @tuwaylubul_3ilm 3 года назад +5

      No it’s not, you just want the chaos to begin instead of being optimistic

  • @bn7835
    @bn7835 3 года назад +3

    May Allah have mercy on Sheikh Ubaydullah and grant him the best of the Hereafter.
    May Allah make the da'wa salafiya and its followers triumph all over the world. May Allah humiliate and destroy the sect of the Muslim Brotherhood, Daesh, the Taliban and their ilk, bring them back to the truth or annihilate them all.
    O Allah protect Muslims from lost sects, protect us from their evils because only you can protect us and come to our aid, you are the powerful, the unshakeable, you know everything and you are the one who answers the invocation of him who invokes you, no deity deserves to be worshiped except you.
    May the peace and salvation of Allah be on our prophet Muhammad, the last of the prophets as well as on his family, his companions and all those who have followed them on the straight path.

    • @karimtemri1664
      @karimtemri1664 2 года назад

      He said the Taliban were creates by USA , this is just a conspiracy theory just like when far right say Islam was created by the Catholics

  • @CrimsonNietzsche16
    @CrimsonNietzsche16 3 года назад +4

    Barakallahu feeka akhi Nasir. Could you also do a refutation of Hizb al Tahreer since they reject الأحاديث الآحاد في العقيدة
    They are a huge sharr like the ikhwaan al muslimeen. Barakallahu feek

    • @وفاءأمشيماء
      @وفاءأمشيماء 3 года назад +2

      Hizb etahrir est une secte egaree. Contre essuna wa tawhid. Ainsi que les freres musulmans et etablir. Ils ne sont pas correctes. Ils font parti du 73 sectes egares

    • @ebucendel4826
      @ebucendel4826 3 года назад +1

      Hizbu‘t-Tahrir are dirty pigs, they are mainly hanafis and hanafis are mutazili

    • @وفاءأمشيماء
      @وفاءأمشيماء 3 года назад +2

      كل من يرفض الأخذ بأحاديث الأحاد في العقيدة ضال مبتدع كائن من كان .لمن شاء الرجوع الى كتاب المحدث العلامة ناصر الدين الالباني رحمه الله بعنوان :",الحديث حجة بنفسه في العقائد والأحكام " كتاب ما شاء الله . الفصل الثالث حديث الا حاد حجة في العقائد والأحكام .ويسرد الأدلة في إثبات ذلك ويقول رحمه الله أن الكثير من اخبار الاحاد تفيد العلم واليقين ويذكر مثالين على موقف بعض الفقهاء من الحديث وجهلهم بالسنة .قد أجاد وأفاد رحمه الله . قلت : الجهل بالسنة وعدم فقهها هو الذي اوردهم هذه الموارد وهم ليسوا من أهل السنة على الإطلاق ومخالفون لها .والله المستعان

  • @ua2981
    @ua2981 3 года назад +5

    These taliban have changed since 2001

  • @Polymath9000
    @Polymath9000 Год назад

    No doubt that Afghan Taliban have some very weird stuff going on but to say that IS first victims were Muslim is blatant lie and slander.Yes there was infighting and rivalries but do not blame without proof.

  • @AbuSabak77
    @AbuSabak77 3 года назад +1

    1st, destiny is the Taliban as the government and the leaders of Afghanistan then they are also leaders for me. As a devout Muslim, it is not worthy of a citizen to speak out and even open the door to fitnah. As a people and we are all as a body that holds the rope of Allahﷻ, It's time we practiced it like the Ibnul Mubarak rahimahullah Every day, and often saying to Muslims of his contemporaries without tirelessly hoping for A PRAYER TO BE ANSWERED, he will ask that he request To Allah ﷻ For the government to be rectifying. Isn't everything in the process of being in the process of being good, and don't expect that their jihad is the same as our multi-resourced, and knowledge-consulting.
    Let's not mind-set us expecting the Taliban "maksum", While they are indeed "taliban" with the leadership of other countries
    Look, their snody in the application of "ask those who know". Thus, what happened to the Airport with the presence of a definite mechanic & technique from SULTAN SYEIKH HAMAD THANI AL TAMIM & SULTAN ERDOĞAN & TSAR PUTIN, and not forgetting the MBS also advised.
    2nd, Alhamdulillah.. The Taliban have used the "battle of heart and mind" method. What you would expect with Shi'ite Afghanistan is that iranians are flatly very stupid in their Shia religion and follow priests without knowledge and objections. As well as more coming out became Christians, agnostic and many were communists.
    3rd, A simple story of modus operandi is the same, killing as many Sunni as possible(iRaq, syam/palestin, Afghanistan) Let the Shia population be high to become iran's satellite state.
    4th, billionaires of the rich are willing to hire military planes of several countries to ship to Iran. Thus, there must be MUHAJIRIN & ANSAR of unislamic majusi Persian al Singh.

  • @theahmedfahad
    @theahmedfahad Год назад

    This video is confusing he calls every one misguided then who is on haqq ?

  • @MS-hh3nq
    @MS-hh3nq 10 месяцев назад

    Subhanallah, I saw many great lectures of this shaykh. But recently I red that he was pro iskp, is that true??

    • @salim4512
      @salim4512 7 месяцев назад

      Untrue he was against iskp

    • @MS-hh3nq
      @MS-hh3nq 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@salim4512yeah i saw, akhi this is all propoganda. In fact I saw a vid where he himself was stating that he was for the emirate and that he was glad that the previous regime was gone.

  • @msq313.......
    @msq313....... Год назад

    FOLLOW quran and sunnha
    twabilan real kings army khorasan

  • @AbdullahHazratbally
    @AbdullahHazratbally 2 месяца назад

    Lies ,lies ,lies ,shaykh ,fear allah,you brain and heart has been taken away by propaganda.

  • @ArifHussain-of3wm
    @ArifHussain-of3wm Год назад

    Western porpaganda about gadafi Saddam was true ?

  • @islamicreminders327
    @islamicreminders327 2 года назад

    I want to ask you who are some shaykh from UK that I can study with I have been looking for the right shaykh but everyone is lacking some thing ( a fundamental belief of Islam)

  • @خیرمحمدموحد
    @خیرمحمدموحد 5 месяцев назад

    ماشاءالله خي ☝️🏴

  • @limuss1
    @limuss1 3 года назад +4

    I think something is better than nothing, if they are doing some minor mistakes just ignore them for it for the sake of Allah ,Muslims need to be united, as we can see we have not a single nation talking about sharia law, if they are trying to apply even a minor part of it, lets just support them and try to correct their mistakes remaining with them

    • @limuss1
      @limuss1 3 года назад +1

      Because at last we are all fighting for a noble cause, let's unite ourselves with our brothers and try to correct them , not to fight with them, l. At last Allah sees our intentions first,

    • @faizan_blue
      @faizan_blue 3 года назад +9

      Thats like saying we should unite with Ahlul Bidah or the Shia.
      Never,we will only unite upon the haqq✊🏽💪🏽

    • @aslave.9433
      @aslave.9433 3 года назад +6

      @@limuss1 we can only unite with one aqeedha.

    • @eltaahiras-salafi7958
      @eltaahiras-salafi7958 3 года назад +7

      Not a single nation talking about sharia?? Have you heard about Saudi Arabia? Their whole nation is built upon Shariah Tawheed and Sunnah. That's why you don't see a single grave being worshipped by some Sufis in Saudi like you see in almost every other Muslim country. And if you want to test that, go to Saudi and I challenge you to make a grave there and start worshipping it like those ignorant Sufis, and see if your head will be attached to your body.

  • @laughinyourface
    @laughinyourface 3 года назад +2

    He’s on about the taliban from 20 years ago

  • @AbuSabak77
    @AbuSabak77 3 года назад

    Maybe you can tabayun. Not everyone needs to know EVERYTHING anyway. That is it, our determinants believe, and that is the worship we have to worship, just as much as we have no knowledge of the spirit, the supernatural hell heaven, jinn angels etc.. But only God ﷻ Knowing, and to what extent we "as simple as believing in all of it,"
    ~ as we worship like A
    We do as if we see Allah ﷻ, and that is for sure Allah ﷻ, and for sure Allah All-Seeing , All Knowing...
    Similarly, the origin of the news that can affect "our faith in obeying leaders" will be recorded from every one we cultivate for all unity in obedience to the government or we ARE ACTUALLY TRAITOR TRAITORS to the COUNTRY, BUT THE INTERNATIONAL BODY MAKES YOU A HERO AND MAKES YOU A WARRIOR OF TRUTH NAMED KASHOGGI (DAJJAL era, RIGHT IS WRONG) See the truth from the lots number of Enemy enemies point at the In firing arrows

  • @solankite2348
    @solankite2348 9 месяцев назад

    Kuwaiti fitteen caused much destruction in India. Thanks for splitting the ummah.

  • @abdunai2929
    @abdunai2929 10 месяцев назад

    Brother, instead of publishing such claims , such talks, ask somebody from Afghanistan , ask somebody who is from the taliban.
    But what are you publishing Akhi ??? Fear Allah !!!!
    Fear Allah , brother.
    Don't spread hate and false information !!!

  • @kindlyafroditi9204
    @kindlyafroditi9204 11 месяцев назад

    And where is your evidence against the taliban, dont make allegation withoit real evidence your a liar..

  • @princevegeta8423
    @princevegeta8423 3 года назад +3

    Salafists are praising them all over fb. Whenever I am pointing em out. They are saying mind your own business . Especially daniel haqiqatjow

    • @m.mprince9929
      @m.mprince9929 3 года назад +3

      Brother they are NOT Salafi, they are deviant who do not know what exactly Salafism is !! Stay away from Deviants liers Jaahil ignorants Munafiqoon

    • @AbuFarouq
      @AbuFarouq 3 года назад

      People can be upon the same manhaj and differ in opinion. Don't make hizbiyah of salafiyah.

    • @karimtemri1664
      @karimtemri1664 2 года назад

      Tbh this video seems a bunch of conspiracy theories.. it mixes up everything.. iran, freemasons, khawarij, thr Americans khomeini etc.

    • @suparpawarindaioksaar3951
      @suparpawarindaioksaar3951 Год назад

      @Sabir what are you??

    • @ahmadfared1204
      @ahmadfared1204 Год назад +2

      Daniobendi ( Daniel haqiqatjou ) is not a salafi. He is a deobandi. He expose himself recently.