+eddiegaltek If you want to predict moves or see what you may have done it's way easier to do that when the monitor was up. Not the best solution tho, agreed on that count.
Kasparov's poker career was cut short when his opponents realized that every time he was dealt bad cards his eyes would get huge and he'd shake his head in disbelief.
In Blitz its all about how quick you can think without making a blunder, blunder and strategy are part of Blitz chess, so don't call Anand Lucky, he was simply the better Blitz player at this game today.
@@vivinvinil3166 you losers think Anand was lucky. How foolish you are! This is chess not a card game. This is a game where luck doesn't work. Kasparov made a blunder and That's all. Anand didn't made because Anand is much good player then Kasparov.
@Nikunj Sanwaria Anand was first GM from India If it was that popular maybe there would have been GM's before him and he sponsors countless chess player in India. And he is the only Indian who was world champion in chess. He influenced a whole country to take chess as a carrier option not just as a hobby.
Both Bannerjee and Sultan Khan were among the strongest players in the world in the mid 19th and early to mid 20th centuries, respectively, but chess seems to have declined in popularity in the second half of the 20th century until Anand repopularized it.
Kasparov always speaks of this game as his blunder and how he was winning until his mistake. But he doesn't give Anand credit for spotting the blunder right away and then converting it into a fascinating win. Even the commentators had not spotted it, so Anand deserves credit.
I like how the commentators call Kasparov's ill-fated move an 'elementary oversight'. Never mind that neither of them saw the move until after Anand made it.
+Randy Bailin well ya but even for an unskilled player it's mostly obvious that you should sacrifice your "weaker" pieces before moving in with heavy stuff ^^
+Randy Bailin Well if human chess players saw each opponent's move they'd be as good as a computer, hm? ;) The key here is that Anand had his previous chess game fresh in his mind, while computers clear their mind between each game, so you can't trick them. But Anand knew he was playing a mere human. With the same opening, he had touched on this alternative move in the previous game and had had time to reflect. While the commentators and Kasparov also recognized the opening, they did not have the alternative fresh in mind as had Anand. This is the brilliance of the trick! Anand had earned himself an advantage unavailable to others. Another reason why the mistake may be deemed elementary (by Brit commentators who get their sarcasm by their mother's milk it seems :D) is that queen takes without exchanges comes few and far between in chess, and in major tournaments all the more rarely. They could also have judged solely by Kasparov's reaction, he certainly deemed it an elementary oversight. But he was predispositioned toward how the previous game played out. He just didn't have access to the alternative moves in Anand's mind. Just brilliant! :)
Fuck...yeah!!! I was thinking for quite some time that Kasparov's face looked very familiar to something I had seen before, but couldn't recall it. Thanks for reminding me it was Mr Bean!!
Look Carefully...if u can spot at 5.06...Kasparov's Eye roll is in 2 parts 😂😁: 1st he looks at the Black pawn as it is being taken by Anand & then eyes roll immediately towards the black rook which will come under attack by the white queen with a Check! 🤣Priceless...so quick and momentary...that shows Kasparov's speed at anticipating the opponents next move!!
What I love with Anand is his passion for chess... That too having lost to Carlsen in finals in 2013...again winning candidates tournament and again challenging carlsen in the year 2014.
He got steamrolled by Kasparov until that one move, so Anand really got lucky here. And even after that, Kasparov proved very recourceful, although Anand played it safe.
kamlesh More Completely wrong. There is luck in chess, but not bad luck. A good example is Nakamura vs Carlsen in Zurich. Carlsen got extremely lucky, while Nakamura can't blame anyone but himself.
Kasparov's facial expression at the 5:20 mark is pretty much the only thing he and I have in common in chess. In fact, I've made that face so many times, I think my 'Blunder-Face Elo rating would be a 1000 points higher. Take that Gary!
Vishy is way better at Blitz than most GMs so when time is low, people blunder against Vishy mostly (whether he makes such moves to make them blunder or not is bot sure)
@@abhinavjain2985yes he is better in blitz than most of the players. He played 47 moves in just 1 second against Hikaru Nakamura, what else do you expect from him to not be callled 'lightning kid'?
My goodness, how awesome it must have been being a grandmaster and commentator and being able to say that Kasparov made an extraordinary and elementary blunder.
I will ALWAYS say Kasparov is, until today, 1 January 2015, the best player of all times (equality Alechin, but, must realise Alechin have not - maybe - the same srtong opponents). BUT, we all must recognize Anand was badly unundestanded because of his origin, because of the macho publicity of the Russians and Europeans. Anand had such a lot of surprises, i ended lovim him too!
+CalvinistOnACouch plz explain the reference. i found it funny simply becuz right of the bat i was like " no it's not a physical game, it's more like 99% mental " then i realized the joke ;)
Yep. In blitz it's common to miss blunders until the millisecond you make your move otb and the blunder becomes apparent. 🤣 So yeah, it's quite possible he had to wait for Anand to make his move so as to not give it away. 😃
The best reaction is not his face slapping but his rapid eye movement when Anand reaches for his figure. You can see his sudden realisation of what is to follow. One can also see how fast a chess player thinks by looking at his eyes how he foresaw all moves after that but didnt see his own blunder.
The camera angle is fantastic and dramatic looking this is some of the best camerawork I've EVER seen filming chess so stuff a donkey in your mouth idiot.
The announcer very clearly says "Qxg4!" There's only one Qxg4 in the game so I am not sure why you find it so hard to figure out what move it is. The camera work is great imo. It totally captures Kasparov's miscalculation. He seems to be expecting white to trade Queens after QxB so he can pile up on c2 after NxQ but he overlooks the open diagonal for white's queen after Qxg4.
GuitarSlinger2112 You do realize that when this was being broadcasted live, people who didn't know the best english were watching. Also the board didn't have letters on it, not everyone has the mental ability to connect different boxes to a place in an instant.
The commentators didn't give Anand the right credit he deserved for this. It was really Anand's superiority which showed Kasparov's blunder to Kasparov and the world. Kasparov didn't realize his mistake until Anand's hand went on that Pawn to gesture that he was going to pick it up - and play that QxP move - while Kasparov was expecting him do QxQ. If really Kasparov was that swift in his calculations, he would have sensed his blunder right away and not after Anand's hand went for the move. Anand is way superior at this specific sequence of moves.
After the blunder, losing the rook on c8 is not the main concern here since Anand does not have any significant moves after that. The main issue is Anand capturing the bishop on g7 then attacking the h8 rook which Kasparov has to save. Anand can then sacrifice the knight on d3 to take e5 pawn completely opening the black king's defence and it will be a beat down after that...
I watch the repeat of Kasparov as he realises the errors of his ways.. the expression is priceless and one worth watching in sequence haha. But it's great that despite his complete oversight of what was, let's be honest, an elementary blunder for most skilled chess players, he still realises it as soon as Anand's hand graces the piece that soon after grabs the pawn that wins the game.
@@adiaswal5940 Most of the Russians hate Kasparov due to his anti-Russian political views and sponsoring. In addition, this was 1996 - a time when drunk Yeltsin sold away the country to the America and ran it into poverty, and Kasparov totally supported him. Hence, I would say that most of the Russians were really happy to see Kasparov lose.
+HenryJonesVictor opponent blunders happen when the opponent is feeling the pressure, so if an opponent makes a blunder against anand, its probably because anand has pressured them into it....unless you are trying to say that Anand is not a good player and just wins by luck ALL the time, and if that is the case, go ahead and say it, instead of beating around the bush
Aditya Mathur Not at all, he's a really good player, I like him. He just gets lucky sometimes, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. Saying that he wins by luck every time would be just plain stupid.
+surendra rathore There is no confirmed physical evidence from the early days of chess. No chess boards or complete chess sets have been found. Some objects excavated by archaeologists might have been early chess pieces, but they might just as easily have served a purpose that had nothing to do with a game. The evidence that we have is taken from literature, and even that is subject to interpretation. Does a certain word translate as 'chess', as some other board game, or as something else entirely?
+Vito Corleone The earliest form of Chess known as Chaturanga in Sanskrit originated in India and was adopted and modified by the Persians and Chinese and later Europeans.. Chess pieces have been found in India...
don't you love it when a director decides to show what he feels to be a dramatic moment/players reaction, but as a consequence the poor old viewer misses all the action. 5:07 - 5:51,, cracking shot of Kasparov in disbelieve that he missed something. Commenter saying "Whats he missed". But wtf, I can't see the fucking board, what the just happened. Well done director, you totally just fucked us over, nice one!!
kelp017 Haha please describe the other features of your universe where this shit editing is acceptable? "A spectacular turnaround that's changed the whole game! Stay tuned until the end to find out what it was!"
For people wondering why Kasparov reacted like this. At 4:50 Knight moved d5 leaving g3 only protected by the Black Queen. Black Queen take Bishop, leaving g4 unprotected. White Queen take g4 opening a fork on rook c8, bishop h7 and also rook e1 attacking black Queen. Kasparov in deep shit..
Good analysis for those who didn't understand why Vishy's move is so critical. However, I assume you were referring to the pawn on g4, not the pawn on g3.
Hartmann Gnadl Watching it live is frustrating for sure, since we miss lots of moves. But this is a _video_, and I think GJ Chess should have inserted board positions, giving his audience a chance to see what was going on.
Good point Hartmann, but nowadays, filming mostly the faces makes the most sense, as they now have a 2d board shown the whole time on part of the screen (or people can follow the game online while watching the players on TV)
Every chess video is like that. The chess content creators are literally all retards because weve been suggesting this basic, ELEMENTARY idea for a long time, but nope. The fucks would have me stare at the mole on the side of someones head.
HA HA Still a board with moves could have been embedded. I am not crticising. This is a problem I face in many chess videos. The enthusiastic persons who post these videos may think about this :)
Who the fuck thought it was a good idea NOT to show the board at the most CRUCIAL parts of the game!!
+eddiegaltek If you want to predict moves or see what you may have done it's way easier to do that when the monitor was up.
Not the best solution tho, agreed on that count.
+eddiegaltek
1996 gonna 1996.
+eddiegaltek yea it pissed me alot at that moment
+eddiegaltek EXACTLY!
+eddiegaltek watch that fragment again, you'll follow the sequence just fine!
The biggest blunder of the game was camera man cutting away from the board at the critical moment
Really dumb positioning
yeah that view from the bottom corner of the board will never catch on lol .. ridiculous..
r/KillTheCameraMan
Yeah actually
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kasparov's poker career was cut short when his opponents realized that every time he was dealt bad cards his eyes would get huge and he'd shake his head in disbelief.
Lol .... and the Oscar goes to Randy Bailin
who won?
lmaoooo comment of 3 years
and that's very funny! :D
Damn that broke me up
The funny thing about Anand is that he has always looked 45 years old his entire career 😂
On point!😂
He’s a reptilian...😂😂😂
😅😅😅😅👌
Right
🤣🤣 his age is stopped..
In Blitz its all about how quick you can think without making a blunder, blunder and strategy are part of Blitz chess, so don't call Anand Lucky, he was simply the better Blitz player at this game today.
Quite true. If you lose, you were not the better player that day. It really is that simple.
vizham blee very true
vizham blee Anand was just lucky.
We all know Kasparov was better
@@vivinvinil3166 you losers think Anand was lucky. How foolish you are! This is chess not a card game. This is a game where luck doesn't work. Kasparov made a blunder and That's all. Anand didn't made because Anand is much good player then Kasparov.
For those who are confused-
*Anand won at the end.*
Anand is GOAT
@@debrupdas615 Ram goat is courageous.
@@starredmonk i didn't find it funny
@@ayanpaul_Rs73.38 tu idhar😲
@@kishanjethwani5565 yep coz i play chess...mei chess base India ke comments mei bhi dikh jaunga
That handshake was faster than their moves.
Imrhan Khan Shajahan 😂😂
9:20 Nobody likes loosing
AS A CHESS PLAYER I ALWAYS GO BACK TO THESE COMMENTARIES ^^
KASPAROV IS THE ONE
Who won?
@@mukundthorat5672 Anand of course. That was the point that Kasparov did a stupid mistake and lost.
Anand single handedly promoted chess in India. It wasn't that popular before he became GM.
WoW You know alot dummy
@Nikunj Sanwaria Invented but not popular.
@Nikunj Sanwaria Anand was first GM from India If it was that popular maybe there would have been GM's before him and he sponsors countless chess player in India. And he is the only Indian who was world champion in chess. He influenced a whole country to take chess as a carrier option not just as a hobby.
Both Bannerjee and Sultan Khan were among the strongest players in the world in the mid 19th and early to mid 20th centuries, respectively, but chess seems to have declined in popularity in the second half of the 20th century until Anand repopularized it.
@@shubhamsingla5314 anand was first grand master from Asia
Kasparov always speaks of this game as his blunder and how he was winning until his mistake. But he doesn't give Anand credit for spotting the blunder right away and then converting it into a fascinating win. Even the commentators had not spotted it, so Anand deserves credit.
I like how the commentators call Kasparov's ill-fated move an 'elementary oversight'. Never mind that neither of them saw the move until after Anand made it.
+Randy Bailin well ya but even for an unskilled player it's mostly obvious that you should sacrifice your "weaker" pieces before moving in with heavy stuff ^^
+cccpredarmy this is the most inane thing i've ever read.
+Randy Bailin Well if human chess players saw each opponent's move they'd be as good as a computer, hm? ;) The key here is that Anand had his previous chess game fresh in his mind, while computers clear their mind between each game, so you can't trick them. But Anand knew he was playing a mere human. With the same opening, he had touched on this alternative move in the previous game and had had time to reflect. While the commentators and Kasparov also recognized the opening, they did not have the alternative fresh in mind as had Anand. This is the brilliance of the trick! Anand had earned himself an advantage unavailable to others. Another reason why the mistake may be deemed elementary (by Brit commentators who get their sarcasm by their mother's milk it seems :D) is that queen takes without exchanges comes few and far between in chess, and in major tournaments all the more rarely. They could also have judged solely by Kasparov's reaction, he certainly deemed it an elementary oversight. But he was predispositioned toward how the previous game played out. He just didn't have access to the alternative moves in Anand's mind. Just brilliant! :)
+Randy Bailin word!
OK, so my comment had a thought in it, so it was TLDR. Sometimes the truth is TLDR.
Gary Kasparov's Epic reaction at 5:03.............LoL.....Reminded me of Mr Bean
Lol....Hahhhha I agree!
Lol....Hahhhha I agree!
Fuck...yeah!!! I was thinking for quite some time that Kasparov's face looked very familiar to something I had seen before, but couldn't recall it. Thanks for reminding me it was Mr Bean!!
so right..... he looks like Mr.bean in general
Lol
LOVE TO SEE ANAND THE WAY HE PLAYS, HAS MORE PATIENT and better concentration
Yes, He’s a very patient and still as a rock!! This is how one should perceive difficulties in life too!!
Yes
Gustavo you are from? Russia?
Kasparov's face as soon as Anand reaches for the black pawn is pure gold.
Yes
5:06 Love how Kasparov's eyes widen with impending horror as Anand moves to capture on g4. Hilarious!
เจ้า deep blue มันคิดยังไงวะ
Hey was it not possible to play queen a7 and save the Queen instead of protecting the room.
Look Carefully...if u can spot at 5.06...Kasparov's Eye roll is in 2 parts 😂😁: 1st he looks at the Black pawn as it is being taken by Anand & then eyes roll immediately towards the black rook which will come under attack by the white queen with a Check! 🤣Priceless...so quick and momentary...that shows Kasparov's speed at anticipating the opponents next move!!
What I love with Anand is his passion for chess... That too having lost to Carlsen in finals in 2013...again winning candidates tournament and again challenging carlsen in the year 2014.
เจ้า deep blue มันคิดยังไงวะ
I just think that if Magnus may have arrived late in chess Anand would have most number of chess champion titles
Kasparov was 33 but looked 53. Anand was 27 and still looks the same today :D
Mindset plus a non violent diet plus cultured background doesn't let you age that fast
@@ramlall56
That doesn't explain how Anand looked old in this video although he was only 27 lol
@@ramlall56 what does non violent diet mean??
They picked a really bad time to cut away from the overhead view
He moves the queen ahead capturing anand's bishop
Ok
Yes.
Jesus SHOW THE FUCKING BOARD
Join the fun chess-bot.com/
Did anyone notice Anand rubbing his hands after grabbing the pawn while Kasparov's reaction ?? .. it was like.... hmm now we are talking 😂😂😂
Anand kept his cool. Such a calm guy! That's what kept him in the game.
He underestimate Anad and made a blunder,
He got steamrolled by Kasparov until that one move, so Anand really got lucky here. And even after that, Kasparov proved very recourceful, although Anand played it safe.
megselv there is no luck in game only winners or loosers
kamlesh More Completely wrong. There is luck in chess, but not bad luck. A good example is Nakamura vs Carlsen in Zurich. Carlsen got extremely lucky, while Nakamura can't blame anyone but himself.
megselv you mean to say all the grandmasters of chess are merely lucky ones.i didnt know that.
Kasparov's facial expression at the 5:20 mark is pretty much the only thing he and I have in common in chess. In fact, I've made that face so many times, I think my 'Blunder-Face Elo rating would be a 1000 points higher. Take that Gary!
OneEyedKeys Lol!
I just make a stone face so the opponent doesn't feel sadistic.
Lol..this comment made my day
5:00 fellow gothamchess fans. also this was a legendary reaction and the fact that he saw the threat as soon as it happened
It's September 2024 (28 years after this match) as I write this comment, and Vishy is still world #10.
The reaction is priceless... still good fight till the end. And Anand still looks the same 30+ years later! :)
Vishy is way better at Blitz than most GMs so when time is low, people blunder against Vishy mostly (whether he makes such moves to make them blunder or not is bot sure)
@@abhinavjain2985yes he is better in blitz than most of the players. He played 47 moves in just 1 second against Hikaru Nakamura, what else do you expect from him to not be callled 'lightning kid'?
5:05 it was on that moment Gary knew, he fucked up
+DhDeadMan hahahahahahahahahah
+DhDeadMan The funny thing about this statement is your grammar. It is "at that moment"
Sai Kiran Oh my god smh, english is not my first language man. What the hell is your problem? Get a life or something
DhDeadMan just trolling m8 lol
yet you know common contractions like smh xD
Sai Kiran xD
My goodness, how awesome it must have been being a grandmaster and commentator and being able to say that Kasparov made an extraordinary and elementary blunder.
5:05 Kasparov is like
OH NO I LEFT THE OVEN ON
You are correct. You can see at the end at 9:18 he gives a quick handshake and he runs to turn the oven off
@@Mj-kl3rb LOL
Kasparov enjoys his game
I will ALWAYS say Kasparov is, until today, 1 January 2015, the best player of all times (equality Alechin, but, must realise Alechin have not - maybe - the same srtong opponents). BUT, we all must recognize Anand was badly unundestanded because of his origin, because of the macho publicity of the Russians and Europeans. Anand had such a lot of surprises, i ended lovim him too!
+dacccad Anand did nt get much publicity like others just coz he is Indian,despite the fact that chess was invented in India
And now he has raised an army in Indian Chess.... there will be a day when all of the candidates contenders will be indian to defeat a Indian WC....
look at Kasparov's popping eyes at 5:05... blunder looks like
losing moment in the game... blundering his queen or the rook.
Yeah, that reaction made the whole video worth it.
+Saturno Luna Absolutely hilarious.
+Saturno Luna Some Louis de Funes type slapstick reaction.
and Anand rubbing his hands together afterward like "hehehehehe...."
This is the commentary quality that's missing in today's streams. Pure gold!
Not really, Peter leko, Narodisky, Hess, Howell. All of them do a better job than this.
@@abhinavshankar414Danny Rensch, Yasser, Fabi, Maurice Ashley. But I do really like Daniel King's style.
Do you know who the commentators were for this game?
I haven't watched or played chess much but I don't like today's commentators just analyzing the game using the engine. It's so fkin boring man.
Remember, chess is 80% mental, and 40% physical.
that little giants reference. well played, sir
I was wondering if anyone would catch it. :)
CalvinistOnACouch that's over 100%, sire.
+CalvinistOnACouch 80%/40%= 2 players
+CalvinistOnACouch plz explain the reference. i found it funny simply becuz right of the bat i was like " no it's not a physical game, it's more like 99% mental " then i realized the joke ;)
It's funny how Kasparov waited for Anand to move before giving his reaction.. He literally controlled himself before anand makes his move 😂😂
Yep. In blitz it's common to miss blunders until the millisecond you make your move otb and the blunder becomes apparent. 🤣 So yeah, it's quite possible he had to wait for Anand to make his move so as to not give it away. 😃
The best reaction is not his face slapping but his rapid eye movement when Anand reaches for his figure. You can see his sudden realisation of what is to follow. One can also see how fast a chess player thinks by looking at his eyes how he foresaw all moves after that but didnt see his own blunder.
LOL!! 5:05 look at Kasparovs eyes >O.O< !!! its like "Holy shit! what have i done?"
The Rocks .
Look at Anand's hands at that moment.
Hahahahhaha. I MADE IT
Legends know how long vishy waited for this game in his previous match against smirin
Me : E5
Anand : E4
Me :Resign ............
You weak 😂
I think you guys pawn jump each other 🤣
Vishy Anand. You are the be-all and the end-all of why India is a chess superpower today
5:33 he acted like mr.Bean lol
Destroyed Kasparov at his peak! That's Anand for you ✌🏻♥️
not his peak
@@AldhairGarza yes ..his peak
@@karuOP replied to a comment after 2 years, you are a legend👍
From 10:46 the commentary is epic along with the music! Danny at its best!
The Lightning Kid as Anand was called. Now he is God of Chess.
I just noticed Anand rubs his hands together after taking advantage of the blunder, he must have felt so relieved lol.
Anand was rubbing his hands together after that blunder. Hilarious! You can feel his relief through the screen!
5:06 It was at this moment, Kasparov knew he had f’ed up.
yes
Go home cameraman, you are drunk.
Go home cameraman, you are drunk.
Go home drunk, you are cameraman
You are home Cameraman, go drunk
In that time it was a great performance to film à chess match 😉
are you drunk cameraman, go home
One of the most incredible blitz chess game of all time.
Hehe... Kasparov is such a drama queen. That's more fun then the stone faces of Carlsen, Anand and the likes.
Hahaha
So true
Stonefaces? Lol have you seen Carlsen play? Every chess player would make the face Kasparov did if they blundered
it depends on the personalities, it will be wierd if Anand started making funny faces
You guys aint see Hikaru orvanchuk play
I repeated again and again Kasparov's movement and emotion after the blunder. It is just so funny...
camera angle at the exchange of 5:10 was blasphemous, I played it over 10x and couldn't see what happened.
The camera angle is fantastic and dramatic looking this is some of the best camerawork I've EVER seen filming chess so stuff a donkey in your mouth idiot.
The announcer very clearly says "Qxg4!" There's only one Qxg4 in the game so I am not sure why you find it so hard to figure out what move it is. The camera work is great imo. It totally captures Kasparov's miscalculation. He seems to be expecting white to trade Queens after QxB so he can pile up on c2 after NxQ but he overlooks the open diagonal for white's queen after Qxg4.
killy731 what?
GuitarSlinger2112
You do realize that when this was being broadcasted live, people who didn't know the best english were watching. Also the board didn't have letters on it, not everyone has the mental ability to connect different boxes to a place in an instant.
Okk
5:17 check kasparov's eyes before anand made his move. Kasparov knew his mistake.
The commentators didn't give Anand the right credit he deserved for this. It was really Anand's superiority which showed Kasparov's blunder to Kasparov and the world.
Kasparov didn't realize his mistake until Anand's hand went on that Pawn to gesture that he was going to pick it up - and play that QxP move - while Kasparov was expecting him do QxQ.
If really Kasparov was that swift in his calculations, he would have sensed his blunder right away and not after Anand's hand went for the move.
Anand is way superior at this specific sequence of moves.
Anand👏👏
Hey Anand is my friend he come to my home
@mabok Lem What?
Anand Vs Kasparov - 1996 Blitz Chess Final. the whole game can be seen if you google it. better than look at the players all the time here...
Dont show the board in the critical moment but take the best face moment in chess history.
Thanks again for your postings!
Dude, show some respect! The "other" guy is Garry Kasparov! A legend of the game!
Commentators: " extraordinary blunder... an elementary oversight..."
Also commentators: "double the Rooks, maybe"
Also commentators: "what.. Queen takes g4.. what's he overlooked?"
Okk
5:04 When girlfriend shows you positive pregnancy test :D
😂😂
More like 9:20
More like 10:54
Memes were not in trend those days Or else Kasparov 's expression would get many memes.
And she has spent the last 6 months with your brother overseas
I like how the commentators pretended to know what's going on and when Kasparov blundered none of them had a clue what just happened XD
After the blunder, losing the rook on c8 is not the main concern here since Anand does not have any significant moves after that. The main issue is Anand capturing the bishop on g7 then attacking the h8 rook which Kasparov has to save. Anand can then sacrifice the knight on d3 to take e5 pawn completely opening the black king's defence and it will be a beat down after that...
the commentary made this video for me. Absolutely incredible!
It's the match of accuracy vs speed...here kasparov is speed and anand is accuracy....undoubtedly kasparov is almost a nemesis for GM's.
Both Gary and Anand ruled chess world for a long period of time.
Have no idea what's happening but am very excited for some reason
Same here
9:21 sorry mate,gotta go,my girl said she's home alone"
10:51, he realizes his mistake, but it's to late.
I watch the repeat of Kasparov as he realises the errors of his ways.. the expression is priceless and one worth watching in sequence haha. But it's great that despite his complete oversight of what was, let's be honest, an elementary blunder for most skilled chess players, he still realises it as soon as Anand's hand graces the piece that soon after grabs the pawn that wins the game.
Anand Made us Indian Proud :)
Yeah but our stupid govt still hasn't given him Bharat ratna.....
@@Thanos-hp1mw who is bharat ratna
@@michaelc2472 it's like the best award u can get in India ..for ur contribution..
@@michaelc2472 "Bharat" means India itself and "Ratna" means jewel. And if u get that award ur considered like a jewel of india
@@souradeepghosh7355 sounds expensive must be nice jewel
Guess how many Mirrors would have been broken in the washroom where Kasparov ran after the handshake...
Long live Russia-India friendship!
for sure dude!
Anand and Kasparov were anything but friends and Kasparov isn't even a russian anymore lol
Here chess game is happening
THEY ARE FRIENDS?
*I DIDN'T KNOW THAT*
@@adiaswal5940 Most of the Russians hate Kasparov due to his anti-Russian political views and sponsoring. In addition, this was 1996 - a time when drunk Yeltsin sold away the country to the America and ran it into poverty, and Kasparov totally supported him. Hence, I would say that most of the Russians were really happy to see Kasparov lose.
I didn't know who won until I saw Anand receiving the award
Proud moment for India in Chess World. Love you Vishy. ♥️
AWESOME ANAND!👍👍👍👍👍👍
That’s my face every time I play chess 😂😂😂
is it just me, seems like the opponent of these "GM biggest blunder", is always anand O.o
+unknown Anand seems to be the luckiest player on Earth. I remember Ivanchuk missing an obvious mate in 1 against him.
+HenryJonesVictor in this game you are feeding of opponent's mistakes. So no surprises here.
+ravishingravi Yeah, that's exactly what we're talking about here: opponent blunders against Anand.
+HenryJonesVictor opponent blunders happen when the opponent is feeling the pressure, so if an opponent makes a blunder against anand, its probably because anand has pressured them into it....unless you are trying to say that Anand is not a good player and just wins by luck ALL the time, and if that is the case, go ahead and say it, instead of beating around the bush
Aditya Mathur Not at all, he's a really good player, I like him. He just gets lucky sometimes, and that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Saying that he wins by luck every time would be just plain stupid.
Blunder of the Century😂..Unforgettable experience for Kasparov and Anand as well!!!
Every time i come here.. It's much entertaining
possible to see the board instead of side camera?????
Yeah didn't u see?
No
Anand's key expressions and eye movement while speaking never changed for his entire career
Kasparov's rage quit ahahahha LOL
5:03 When you forget the pizza in the oven 😂
Anand did nt get much publicity like others just coz he is Indian,despite the fact that chess was invented in India
+surendra rathore There is no confirmed physical evidence from the early days of chess. No chess boards or complete chess sets have been found. Some objects excavated by archaeologists might have been early chess pieces, but they might just as easily have served a purpose that had nothing to do with a game. The evidence that we have is taken from literature, and even that is subject to interpretation. Does a certain word translate as 'chess', as some other board game, or as something else entirely?
+Obama Pimp Jr. HahA
+Vito Corleone The earliest form of Chess known as Chaturanga in Sanskrit originated in India and was adopted and modified by the Persians and Chinese and later Europeans.. Chess pieces have been found in India...
source ??????
+surendra rathore kasparov is an azerbaijani jew... your argument is invalid ^^
Kasparov's eyes at 5:06!! :D
That was the quickest resignation I´ve ever seen.
Enough said! Thanks for uploading!
Their hands are working faster than my internet😂😂
True
don't you love it when a director decides to show what he feels to be a dramatic moment/players reaction, but as a consequence the poor old viewer misses all the action. 5:07 - 5:51,, cracking shot of Kasparov in disbelieve that he missed something. Commenter saying "Whats he missed". But wtf, I can't see the fucking board, what the just happened. Well done director, you totally just fucked us over, nice one!!
"Hey mom look! Another bloody idiot who obviously can't wait to watch until the end of the video!"
"It's a mystery how they even breathe, son."
aw….fucked over….sniff sniff…..
kelp017
Haha please describe the other features of your universe where this shit editing is acceptable? "A spectacular turnaround that's changed the whole game! Stay tuned until the end to find out what it was!"
This was a really fast and exciting game!! Poor Kasparov. He was clearly better
Yeah
Like how Anand rubs it in by holding his hand over the piece for a while before actually making the move!
For people wondering why Kasparov reacted like this. At 4:50 Knight moved d5 leaving g3 only protected by the Black Queen. Black Queen take Bishop, leaving g4 unprotected. White Queen take g4 opening a fork on rook c8, bishop h7 and also rook e1 attacking black Queen. Kasparov in deep shit..
Good analysis for those who didn't understand why Vishy's move is so critical. However, I assume you were referring to the pawn on g4, not the pawn on g3.
@@brayancr3230 bishop on g7, not h7. it was a really bad spot to cut away, especially with the announcers saying "what's he missed?"
5:15
0:47 Those clocks are og with specific name engraved and solid af
kasparov facial reation on 5:05.... ohhh fcuk... shivering chill down the spine..... lol
Time and time I come back here and watch ths video to see Gary Kasparov reaction when he realised he blunder the Queen.
I believe the video director has no chess experience. What do you get from seeing the faces all the time?
Hartmann Gnadl Watching it live is frustrating for sure, since we miss lots of moves. But this is a _video_, and I think GJ Chess should have inserted board positions, giving his audience a chance to see what was going on.
Good point Hartmann, but nowadays, filming mostly the faces makes the most sense, as they now have a 2d board shown the whole time on part of the screen (or people can follow the game online while watching the players on TV)
Every chess video is like that. The chess content creators are literally all retards because weve been suggesting this basic, ELEMENTARY idea for a long time, but nope. The fucks would have me stare at the mole on the side of someones head.
Its always like this. There is no chess video director who has an IQ above single digits. There is no way
5:09 look at Anand saying yeah baby with his hands rubbed.
I wish that they would have kept the tournament board view so we could see what happened.
They explained it at the end of the video!!!
@@MrFedexfefo thankd
Thank u for the video. Pls show the board always when u r showing a chess game. The aura generated in the video was nothing less than WWF!
doesn't anybody notice this is the original video from 1996? :/
HA HA Still a board with moves could have been embedded. I am not crticising. This is a problem I face in many chess videos. The enthusiastic persons who post these videos may think about this :)
Remember this, "Empires don't last forever." Likewise, "Champions don't last forever."
lol @ kasparov stumbling off in shock, such an expressive guy haha
5:05 lmfao I do that same thing right after moving a piece and realizing "oh no... oooaahhh shiiiiit, he's totally gonna see that"
I have no idea why, but I constantly find myself coming back to this video. And it's not solely because of Kasparov's reaction.