Kasparov's Calculations - Mindboggling!!! (very instructive)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 мар 2013
- Support GJ_Chess:- www.paypal.me/GJChess
Website:- www.gjchess.com
FACEBOOK :- / gjchessofficial
Gary Kasparov, Kasparov Vs Karpov, Chess calculations, How to do chess calculations, Kasparov Immortal, Kasparov in world championship, Chess world championship final, 1990, Lyon, Chess videos, Chess Documentary
Number one rule when playing Kasparov:
The earlier you resign , the smarter you appear.
Totally agree
Tell that to chucky
Hahaha, many great comments here :))
*kasparov moves pawn*
Me *resigns*
@@mewmannamwem6087 Yes because you see that line is un-winnable for whatever color you're playing 😂
"Here let me show you like 25 possible outcomes from this point in the game." He does so in the same amount of time it takes me to decide which pawn I should move in the opening.
Number 1 Kasparov has natural talent for the game. Number 2 Kasparov has most likely devoted a significantly larger amount of time to chess than you, if I were to take a guess I'd say you are an occasional chess player. Number 3 This game was part of the Kasparov-Karpov match for the World Title, so he probably spent a good deal of time mulling over each possible move and combination before going for it. So my point is that you shouldn't feel like an idiot in view of the fact Kasparov is the exception and not the rule.
Truth hurts
@@jacoboribilik3253 :)
Not trying to flatter anyone. Simply pointing out that he rapidly shows a number of outcomes in the same amount of time it takes me to decide my opening move as I originally stated; i.e. he's a lot better at chess than I am. Whether or not it's normal for him is irrelevant as it's not normal for me.
@@jacoboribilik3253 I have never seen such a beautifully crafted comment in my history of scrolling through youtube comments
Title of this Video: Kasparov's Mindbogling Calculation
Kasparov: "I, I did not calculate"
I think he means he didn't expect Karpov Qe8?
When you do something so many times your brain starts to calculate things even if you don't feel like you aren't paying attention to it.
@@manuman5319 In the end, intuition in chess cames down to pattern recognition. You saw many different positions many times, and u know what positions should be winning for u and just play a move based on that. Often, there is no need to ACTUALLY calculate, which is actually see what are gonna be the next possible moves and lines that derive from your candidate move. If you always calculated every single move you do on the board with a good depth of maybe 10 moves ahead, you would be an engine. It's very tiring to calculate with a good precision, and therefore no human can do it ALWAYS, for long periods of time. And let's not forget that we often make mistakes or miss something on the spot, and that time management on a match is a big factor too.
Often times when you play chess, you just think "I think this is a fine move, let me see if there is an immidiate threath... Uh... Yea, seems good, let's do it." This feeling is much more accurate and much more profound at GM level, and even greater at Super GM level. Kasparov was a beast at many things on the board, and his "intuition" is one of the most remarkable things about him. More than World Champion, Garry is chess legend - there is no discussion about that.
@@manuman5319 more like humans are bad at calculation. When you just play so much you have intuitive pattern recognition and that's where humans are actually good .
Every humans sucks at pure calculation even a super grandmaster , they are not inhunan geniuses who can calculate like a computer
@@manuman5319 you dont have to do something so many times... your brain calculating and deciding things all the time without your consciousness, not only in chess.
I don't think no one had ever so much technical understanding of Chess as Kasparov. Bobby Fischer and Carlsen are genius and sometimes it comes natural to them, but Kasparov literally understood upside down the probabilities and tactics of every single move made on the board. Even Carlsen once said that he could not explain how he knew, but he just knew what to do, while Gary not only knows, he knows why and that's what differentiates him from everyone.
i think Fisher can be compared to Kasporov, Carlsen is a genius without a doubt, but he seems slower in this thinking compared to what kasporov shows.. i wanted to meet each other on their peaks.. would be nice to see
I think fischer very much understood his positions as well as kasparov. He was an excellent calculator
Carlsen said same thing, they all are talking about subconscious mind.
as expected from Botvinnik's apprentice
True
Me after winning the first game in lichess
huh
ahahahah
Me too 😄
I do analyzing game every won game with 1100 rate 😄 🤣
😂👍🏻👍🏻
Karpov doesn't get the credit he deserves, he and Kasparov played over 100 games, and Gary's has only 2 points over Anatoly. 2 fantastic players.
2 absolute geniuses
Right. And karpov is like +10 years. Both goats
Karpov and Fischer was the great match the world of chess missed out on.
@@andymullarx6365 yes the world missed that, I don't think Karpov could have defited Fischer, but it's possible that Karpov would have grown in that match enough to later beat Kasparov.
@@cristiangamboa2037 please don't underestimate Karpov. He was world champ and won Candidates many times to challenge Kasparov later on
Kasparov be like: "I saw 14000605 futures"
Interviewer: "and how many did you win?"
Kasparov: "all of them"
underrated comment
Lmao this should be on like 10k likes
That will earn you thousands of likes in the future. You had mine before writing this
Well done. Very good comment. 10/10
I liked this comment before 10k likes. Cheers.
I'm stunned just how quick and charismatic Kasparow was. Most of grandmasters I know are geniuses but they tend to talk awkwardly and not clearly. I've lost my words.
And he was speaking in English, lol
His English is also quite good here.Usually Russians have a very thick English accent
@@jamesmarshall4364 Yeah he's so natural at speaking English in a time when it wasn't common ,even Carlsen's English isn't that good as Kasparov.
@pianist1408 lol, i know fish trap, but Kasparov literally stayed nr 1 for decades... Nakamura hasnt even reach number one, further Kasparov literally was battling chess and fighting everything, the other guy is a narcissist that used is overconfidence to make is opponents insecure and used his cheater aura and cheating scandals to get a edge vs his opponents. Once he got discovered his wins suddenly disappeared...
@@pianist-yx6ot niemann?🤣🤣this better be a troll comment
What impresses me the most, is his ability to put back the pieces to their original positions so quickly. That's the mark of a Grand Master: memorizing positions effortlessly.
I could never be a great chess player, let alone a master. But that doesn't preclude me from thoroughly enjoying this (although I had to step back the time index a few times in order just to follow him...lol).
Thanks for posting this.
Man, if u study a lane u know the position
I had the same opinion when I first saw this some years ago. But after studying chess everyday, it is not as remarkable as it appears. Gary also said, “I found some of these later.” Clearly he looked at this for a long while before the interview. Chess players also use technical memorization tricks like chunking and retrograde analysis. Check out GM Maurice Ashley’s Ted Talk on the subject. I never thought I could do this. Now I have several games committed to memory and I’m 46. In summation, you def can do this with some effort.
@@wiredog771 Oh, come on! If you had progress in chess good for you, if must have take effort and dedication. If the case of a GM like Kasparov that effort and dedication is just out of reach for most ordinary men. So please refrain next time you have the urge to say "oh i can do that too, is easy" or "is not remarkable". It makes you look as a dbag, plus is not truth: nothing is easy, everything takes dedication.
@@jaconova No it does not make him look like a 'd-bag', it makes you look very weak for not believing in yourself.
J.C Rodríguez I’m not saying I can do that. Jesus, I was at the chess forum in nyc last night and lost 13 games in a row. I’m only 1500 elo but I was 950 two years ago. All I was trying to do was to encourage those who watch this who don’t study chess and will be scared off the game completely or from trying to get better because to the untrained eye, this looks super human when, after you get a coach and study a single position or game for a period of time, these calculations don’t seem impossible. Most 2000s I know have dozens of games memorized. I’m not a d bag. But thanks for the encouragement.
Kasparov could beat me with just his king.
don't think so
Best comment :D
Surodeep Sheth This man.
Not even funny..
Surodeep Sheth he can't
If he wasn’t a grand master he definitely had a solid career as a pick pocket with that hand speed😜
Hahahahahahahha
😁👌
Or card tricks too
Heh, with his lack of poker face, he’d not be a very good pick pocket hahaha. Watch some footage of his reactions to blunders, and you’ll see why Kasparov had to retire from his career as a professional poker player prematurely.
He was tho, in mother rusia
This is how powerful you must be to beat the final boss of chess.
2:51 you could see his passion in that smile :)
i'd call that "trolling smile",; but whatevar!
He smiled because he realized the guy had no clue what was going on.
Also that he had a problem by not washing his teeth
@@aitorjara100 Who cares?
@@Elixir6 Not you or him, that's for sure
I felt my IQ jump 20 points by just watching this video.
in all the years i used youtube, this is the first time i actually used playback speed of 0.25
Lol 🤣
Where is Agadmator when you need him
He did cover this game in the video, Karpov is the challenger
Nobody:
Agadmator: well hello guys
Captures
Captures...
Somewhere looking at an engine and being a shit player.
@@tedsretardretardium6174 He is rated above 2000
even watching the way he rewinds the pieces, after the what would of happened, was brilliant.. so quick
Paul Doyle
It shows amazing memory
*It’s Rewind Time*
If I tried to move the pieces that fast they would end up on the floor or in someone's coffee.
They did in most Kasparov, Karpov games.
🤣
you should try moving pieces on a high quality set. Weighted pieces are a pleasure to move on a smooth board
The fact thet he said cofee😂😂
ahhh the rare Coffee gambit hahaha
Kasparov really does prove the old saying 'Genius is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration' ....he was an incredibly hard worker off and on the board
a young Kasparov showing the skills that made him to be the # 1 ranked chess player for 20 years.
narrator: Karpov concedes
subtitles: Carved pumpkin seeds
makes sense. xDD
🤣🤣
Me vs Kasparov
Me: pawn E5
Kasparov: pawn E4
Me: I rezign
+Mojjj Wait. If you move white pawn to E5 at the start you make imposible move and you will be suspended. And in this case the oponent automaticly wins.
+DarkEssence kasparov must have given away the first move (being the better player)
+Mojjj lol 1 e5 is illigal :D so u would just lose right away no need to resign :)
Hahaha
+Mojjj this is funny anyway
I think the memory of these men is absolutely amazing. To be able to process that much information in your head is just unworldly. Also memory recall seems to be an underrated aspect of intellectual genius. A lot clever people out there but simply could not keep track of that much info in their head. Elite genius is like dealing with a computer for a brain.
Yeah but today's markets are based on easy information 24/7, executives use statistics combined with their databases, memory is not a problem because information is stored today in a greater level and it's easily accessed. Big data also is very important in the decision making process. About Kasparov, he is the GOAT, in my opinion.
Kasparov is so happy when explaining. Shows that true genius often requires an adoration towards your purpose.
Anatoly Karpov is genious too. He saw all the lines, and that's why he resigned. Not just that, in the match for the world chess cup, Karpov wom many beautiful games against Kasparov, look at them, and then talk. Both are amazing players. In the interview of course Kasparov must underrate Karpov, he is his ARCHIRIVAL.
True. I think their score against eachother is Kasparov 27-21 Karpov with like 130 draws or something :D That's a very close matchup
Karwan Nouri I think its 21-19,with 100 draws,I can be wrong tho
Definitely one of the greatest rivalry of all time. Their rivalry is reminds us of Capablanca against Alekhine. Whose scores were also very close.
According to chessgames.com..
Capablanca beat Alekhine 9 to 7, with 33 draws.. very close
And Kasparov is much younger than Karpov.
He did see the lines, only it was too late
This is beautiful but the real thing is to get this position against a great world champion as Karpov
This must look incredibly advanced for a beginner player, but if we break it down a little bit we can come to the conclusion that a lot of people can make the calculation from the video's starting position. The hard part is reaching the strong position that allow all the tactics to work and that is truly the masterful play!
I have 2200 on lichess, and it's still incredibly difficult to find all these options, despite the fact that tactics are my strong point. I think you overestimate people.
@@user-ct1cx5gj9u 2200 lichess is 1400 otb lmao
@@rawrxd4919 2200 rapid lichess is about 2000 FIDE.
@@user-ct1cx5gj9u no it fucking isnt lmao
@@rawrxd4919 Do you have any arguments or something? Where did you get 1400? Or you can only shit with words.
if you have curiosity about the way Kasparov used to analyze his own games, take a look to Seirawan's book, Chess Duels, when the author tells and impressive moment, back in 1981, when Gary was just a kid (18 years old), and he made a deep analysis of his game against Spassky. In Yasser Seirawan words:
"All that Spassky could say was yes, of course, yes, of course, while Gary analyzed his game with absolute mastery. After that hour watching him....Jan, Ljubo and me reuturned to the hotel in complete silence, still absorted by this incredible talent"
Amazing story, cheers for sharing it
Yeah that's a cool anecdote.
Yasser's always that cool dude, he made the chess atmosphere a little lighter
@@nza1804 Thanks to you, but my best advice is to read "Chess duels", one of the best chess books ever written. Very, very entertaining anecdotes and stories of the enconunters between Seirawan and the world champions (Smyslov, Tahl, Petrosian, Spassky, Fischer, Kárpov and Kaspárov).
@@corkystorky Yeah, he is a wonderful commentator, but his relationship with Gari has improved a lot since both retired from professional chess
That moment you realize how bad you still suck at chess lol.
Jason Jewell agreed lol
Jason Jewell so true lmao
SAAAAAAME ;-;
Was just about to say the sane thing . Lol
@@edmondt848 Thats all good but you wont ever be Fishers level just by doing those things. After a certain time you will hit the ceilling after which your rating wont ever increase. Fisher had a deep understanding of chess and he was able was able to find best moves even in abosolutely new positions you would never be able to do that just by doing the things you said.
Wow Kasparov's mentality over attacking and defending pieces is incredible!
The key takeaway is that both Kasparov and Karpov likely saw these lines. The decisive difference is that Kasparov saw it all one move earlier.
I love how smoothly he handles the pieces on the board. Also he seems like a genuinely nice person.
I love the way Kasparov talks "He kill the bishop... so what?".
+Alex Bonesteel A dead bishop is the best bishop.
+ChaoYun yeah and that's make you a good person by saying that...
+Alex Bonesteel Reminds me of Jose Mourinho
The only important piece is a King. The others are a means to the W
"So what?" If he kills _that_ particular bishop, then at least five choirboys won't be molested.*
[*] Although one bishop is fully capable of molesting thousands of choirboys in just one year, I'd used the cardinal number "five" to avoid scaring children. Another reason was because Father McKenzie, for instance, was only proven to _molest_ seven choirboys in his lifetime; after that, he began brutally raping them instead.
...ok, he moves here, i move here, he takes that, i take this... i think i got this figured out, here, hold my beer.
I laughed all knight to that lol
+Robertushka Tea That was a really bad pawn.
+JJJMMM1 A rookie pun, you need to check yourself mate :D (click)
+CDATA Most excellent! Have a like good sir or ma'am.
Raymond Dudley I'm a guy and thx, glad you weren't board. haha
The recognition of mating nets, the general principles and quick calculation of who had the quicker amd more potent threat all in one video. Gary is so fast he is hard to follow until you are used to recognising the explanations in game analysis. He was so enthusiastic here.
I love the analysis board. The coordinates are not pointing towards either player, but to those watching. Helped a lot to keep up with them
I only wish that Fischer had not completely lost his mind but had continued to hold the championship at least until Kasparov came along - and then the two of them could have played for the world championship - wow, that would have been some incredibly exciting chess.
Steven Yourke indeed. Think we'd seen a very much lower frequency of draws than what is common nowadays.
Don't u think Karpov is strong too? We don't know if Fischer can defense the title against Karpov
@@tuankietnguyen1252 Fisher’s Elo rating was significantly higher than was Karpov’s. Fischer, 2780, Karpov, 2705.
@@tuankietnguyen1252 Of course it is not said that Fischer would have beaten Karpov. But I think S Y is referring to the interesting clash of (similar?) styles a match between Fischer and Kasparov would have given.
fischer would be old and kasparov will be in his prime
The way he chuckles almost arrogantly is so cool to watch..almost as if it is the most obvious move .
Kasparov built the hospital where he was born
Videos like this (not just about chess) actually make you appreciate the beauty of games/sports
I didnt know Jose Mourinho plays chess
Oh man, u made my day
Is this for the voice or for the face ?
B GDouff face
B GDouff Voico to
I heff nussing to say
at the highest level of thinking....multiple processes become intuition.
Child like genius, what a player, what a move, he brought chess to life for me when I was learning.
I come back to watch this video every month, First watched it about 5 years ago. Started playing chess ever since
2:49 best part hhahaha There is no defense... snfsnfsnfsnf
Ludi DaVinci LOL... :D
can someone explain why is that not a stalemate?
nevermind i see it
Wonderful.
Lol stupid
I know some of those words
I don't even know those ones.
Here they are called The Lunatic and The Horse
Then you have The Tower, and instead of Queen, it is literally called "The B*tch" xD
lol where is that?
I know inly one.
Check mate
The way he snickers gives me the chills. There are so many variations and outcomes that it seems humanly impossible to calculate that many moves in that sitting.
That's why he didn't calculate them. He was able to intuit that he had an overwhelming force without having to actually calculate it.
By now computers are far better than humans at chess because they can calculate so much deeper and with perfect accuracy, but humans are still a lot better than computers at doing exactly what Kasparov did in this game: Intuitively recognizing advantageous patterns.
I love his expression in the preview; it's a mixture of enjoying chess and being proud of his chess
My ELO is 1.
+Guillaume Huet Chess rating goes up to low 3000's
No. 1
Красава))
Fun fact, you get that Elo from surrendering at your first game, so just play Kasparov and do that :D
Elo, not ELO. It's a surname, not an acronym.
Me: E5
Kasparov: Mate in 37 moves.
... 37 moves later...
Kasparov: Checkmate.
lol
How can you play e5 at the first move? sorry for my english
+Carlos Alberto Well, you can play e5 first move if you're black
+arsenalfanrichi
But normally whites play first
+arsenalfanrichi
Well
is possible play with black first but...
2:10 At my modest level in chess, I'm so impressed at how they remember the whole game, and during their analysis, when finished exploring a certain variation, they can just from their memory set up a previous position many moves before without even appearing to think about it!
I first saw this video when I had no idea how to even play chess. I've been regularly coming back to it as I'm progressing (~1300s now) and the fact that every time I come back I can understand just a little bit more of it is mind boggling. When I finally understand the whole thing, I'm probably going to become a better person.
No really
I saw a documentary on Kasparov once, he remembers all the phone numbers he has ever dialed something to that effect over 10,000. Magnus Carlsen has memorized over 10,000 Grand master tournament chess games, and can recall a particular position or middle game position on a particular board. Amazing!!!
So I think memorizing all opening theory is a walk in the park for him, hence a superior advantage.
10.000 would be autistic.
@@sebaba001 Dude.. try one. Just try to play a full game and memorise all the moves.
Remembering over 50 is autistic level.
@@GreyZonex Not if you study it and its your life. Concert classical pianists can play a 45 min symphony and longer from memory. You would be surprised what your mind can hold. Think of how many songs you can sing along with. Ill bet its in the 100s. Word for word and hear the melody and guitar and bass.
@@Yngsatchvai music is a language, its different
@@sfgox10 Chess is a language too. It all makes a lot of sense when it's connected. It's not just "he can memorize it". No. He UNDERSTANDS IT, and use it in his advantage.
Explanation from the perspective of numbers:
10 attackers (11% more) - 9 defenders
5 attackers (25% more) - 4 defenders
4 attackers (33% more) - 3 defenders
3 attackers (50% more) - 2 defenders
2 attackers (100% more) - 1 defender
quantity PLUS quality (think about 2x Knights vs 1x Queen).
It is also impressive that the interviewer was able to keep up with Kasparov and understand and respond quickly.
That is truly amazing.
Look how happy he is explaining his strategies. King of the nerds!!
An ultimate nerd
its absolutely stunning he can calculate everything in the right way!
I love how excited he tells and shows how genius his position is, you can tell he is proud of how infallible it is, hey! I would be aswell, the position is just perfect
Both were amazing. Just two legends¡
Now I understood how fantastic is human mind to calculate these many variations....................
when he was younger he used to look like pete sampras ^^
Tennis fan
agreeded
both champions!
Amazing future calculations by Gary !
You do what you love with all your passion and all your time, you become a master.
The speed in which Kasparov moves the pieces around the board is so unbelievable in my opinion… wow
I love Kasparov's games and Kasparov's person.
Thank you for uploading this video, I enjoyed it a lot!
Unreal memory! Id be doing well to remember one of those scenarios!
Fantastic battles between two great players at that time in chess history I was lucky enough to be able to get tickets for the London leg of their 1986 World Championship match. Life is a bizarre journey for me because in 2000 I gave up a job in pro football to become a full-time chess coach and when Gary came to a London book signing at the old Euston chess shop I went along and with thousands of others lined up to meet him. I got his attention when I asked him to sign his autobiography and he asked me what I thought of the book. I still treasure that book it is hidden in my library with thousands of other books.
Kasparov will be always one of the best players for me.
Right, well I'm glad he cleared that up !!
6:36
*shifts in chair*
Clearly overcome with a burst of immense emotion
He giggles like a kid... which clearly shows how much he enjoys mixing up his moves.
Fascinating...
Incredible when you realise that GK is doing this to Karpov !! Who was World Champion for ten years from 1975 to 1985. Karpov in his heyday and pomp hardly ever lost a game and he was never outplayed and outclassed like this by anyone. I doubt that even Fischer at his peak could have done this to Karpov !!
skyrim no wait for your business
actually the score between them is really close,i think 2 point difference,so their competitive strength was about equal..Karpov was really good at countering your strategies,thats why Kasparov tried to win by tactics and complications,otherwise it would be like 98 draws 1 win and 1 loss
You seem to be forgetting that Karpov became World Champion by default. Fischer would have whooped his ass if his requirements had been met.
Karpov after he got the title when crazy on tourney he had a record or still have winning most tourney in the history of chess just to proof he earned that tile. Karpov was great chess champion. @@sadboitimes9012
@@sadboitimes9012 Fischer refused to play; that's a loss in my book
The way he puts the pieces back on the board so quickly is oddly satisfying
Never played chess In my life. Why am I watching this? It's amazing.
Kasparov is the best player in chess ever! Yeah Carlsen has a higher rating now but Kasparov "invented it all". I'm not saying Carlsen is "a copycat" but I'm only saying he is continueing what Kasparov started decades ago. Carlsen is a skilled player who can turn a seemingly tied middlegame into his win but Kasparov could sacrifice and still win along with these multidimensional combinations we just saw here against Karpov. No question, Kasparov is the best chess player ever this far.
I think Petrosian was the best of all time
+elijah shypitsyn his sharpness of mind is underestimated by many because of his draw before loss attitude but when the big games were on the line he brought out one of the best attackers to play the game
+elijah shypitsyn draw before win* is what I meant he didn't go for the throat till his opponent messed up for the most part
I have a problem with your statement .
Computers have changed the history of chess ,as means of transport did .
Bobby Fischer ,for me ,is still the best ,because he became the WC all by himself ,without our actual technology .
to me..Kasparov played a lot of moves that , by being taught by the book, would have lost the game. However, he 'knew' it should work and it more than less did. It was just a master at work. I still think RJF would beat him in a match, though. Just because of RJF masterful knowledge of theory.
LOL I love his laugh at 2:52 there is no defence for king...!
Why is it that I can barely play chess but am still fascinated by chess videos and could listen to this forever. Especially Kasparov.
Amazing and inspirational.
I could beat Kasparov............in Snakes and ladders ! :)
+irelandbloke That's not chess. ..haha
ireland,you can beat Kasparov but not Karpov...
..... anyone COULD, no one CAN
Chutes and Ladders?
LeftMeNot same game, different names
That's how I used to do it.
David Nantz *hold my beer*
David Nantz 😄😄😄😄😄
Simplemente brillante ❤
People don’t remember probably now. But Karpov was so unbelievably good as well. You should interview him too 👍🏻
one of the finest videos on the Internet. show this to children
turn on subtitles, its hilarious!
Oh man, I had to pause it more than once! It was just too much! Hysterical! I was crying!
😂 Strong observation man!
LOL
+Lucas Haywardl The meeting will be here because none of its own chicken.
Bubbling convicts who won will be someone who could be six.
Holy crap, he is moving faster than I can think. Respect.
before i came upon this video i would play chess only thinking of maybe one or two options for my next move... i was a casual player and still am but after i watched this a few years ago i made a greater effort to try and visualize many more options and their possible outcomes. I became quite a strong player among my friends often i would not lose except to one of my friends who was a much more serious player. I love chess and this video inspired me to pursue more knowledge in the game.
And how the heck Kasparov could foresee all the future moves in mind in such a time limit?? Damn! genius!
I once played a grandmaster who as a handicap to help me took his queen and one rook off the board at the start of the game. Long story short I was check-mated by the 8th move.
Hey that's cheating. If he didn't have the queen he couldn't have blundered it
At the start, the rook and queen are hardly used
playing this video with subtitles is something else
The way his face lights up when talking about his calculations is adorable
4:51 That evil laugh when he just mated you, and brings home your girl !!
I was searching for someone who noticed!
Haha
İ am laughing with same way
The other way around actually.
First he'll mate your king, then he'll mate your queen.
Moderator: "It's wonderful"
Kasparow: "It's mate again" 2:51
I have just experienced a strange feeling. I did not understand a mere second of this content, yet I somehow felt Kasparov´s greatness.
I had the Kasparov PSone chess game it was so good especially the sound effects so cool 😎
Kasparov, Alekhine and Capablanca are and will always be my most favorite players of all times. Greatest playets of all times, in my humble opinion. Kasparov's attack, Alekhine's ultra deep combinations and Capablanca's perfect and error-free move choices. What magicians!
nah mann u wrong afffg
@@thunder9793 about what?
@@Count.Dracula46 about not including neither fisher, magnus, morphy, nor lasker in the list these are the true greatest players of thier times they were unmatcheble in their primes, lasker was a champ for 27 years, morphy probably had the greatest gap between him and other players of his time, fisher litteraly managed to defeat one of the biggest countries in history, tens of USSR 's best players were helping boris to prepare while fisher only had himself and his trainer, and lastly magnus carlsen currently demonstrates the level of chess understanding that has never been seen before, he is without a doubt the best player that ever existed, he is the true mozart of chess, especially the endgames, the are super accurate and Carlsen doesn't blunder, maybe alekhine and capablanca were geniuses but the guys I listed were much better. (P. S. I agree about Kasparov, he is also one of the goats)
@@thunder9793 Fischer was amazing too, and I love his playstyle a lot. About Carlsen, he had and has the chess engines and database of millions of games and openings available to him. Capablanca had engine level accuracy a whole century before. As much as I love and respect Morphy and Dr Lasker, nothing comes even close to the beauty of Alekhine's chess. And btw, Malik Mir Sultan Khan was hands down the most amazing and genius chess player of recorded history.
@@Count.Dracula46 Don't underestimate Carlsen just for him havimg engines, engines can't help in the endgame or in the late middlegame, they do help you with openings and also show you your mistakes but blaming magnus's success solely on engines and databases is wrong cause every other player today also has it but magnus still manages to dominate and had 5 world titles which is a very serious feat, also I agree that alekhine was a great tactician but mikhail tal's games are much more beautiful and interesting to watch and can youbplease explaine by which logic you put malik sultan khan above all the players that i have listed
My game against Kasparov....(I'm white) 1. f4 e6 2. g4 Qh4#
I was stunned by his calculation :O
kkkkkkkk
really love watching this.
Its just brilliant