I've watched all of your videos ever since I found you about 2 weeks ago. These shorts to remind me of your final grade/opinions are top shelf, please keep 'em comin!
Here is a better one, bet both zeros and 32 numbers. 5 per number will give you a profit of 10. If you want a bigger win reduce the bet numbers, higher risk higher reward. My original strategy, you are welcome.
Hi Jack! I like the coverage on the felt as there are only 6 whacks. I would use this system to get in for a quick profit and then get out! Great analysis! Robert
not sure if this is the best place to ask but would it be better to bet the 1245 square and the 2356 square two more whacks but there is a 5ish% chance to jackpot on the 2 and 5 while keeping the rest of the board mostly positive
I don't understand why you can't just do this. Then add to the 0/00 and do a lambert 1 unit bet increase on it until roll spin 34. This way you would only have 4 numbers that lose and a jackpot pay out on 0/00 if it comes.
I’m a very sure footed person German and Engineer always want a safe bet but it’s never the best option for advancing your winning. They you wife shows up and wants your Meager winnings
I used this system last week made $250 with it in over 1 and half hours. I made my own system now which switches up when you loose and double down when you win. So you basically don't loose large amounts towards the end.
Thanks for this video. You mention the gain of $10.00 but the recovery is bad return at just $10.00. What system do you reccomend for greater returns? Great videos ty from the UK Single zero city.
I like 1 minute reviews ❤I don’t like the risk reward for this one though. The best way to play this is get in for 3 wins and get out. But that’s only $30 win. So I give it a D+ 😂
Wow people are saying great coverage, which I have won and lost on Romanosky, but are forgetting the horrible success rate compared to other methods. 56% is almost 1 to 1 odds. The risk and reward coupled with success rate is awful. ❤ your stuff man
I played this system and its actually really good but i think after 5 spins should not play only because the ball tends to hit the only you arent playing after 6 hits
Very risky system for so little return. If you get lucky in the beginning and get on a run then you can cash out ahead, but if you get whacked early you are done, you will never get back.
Pros and Cons: Con = the win is low for the bet, Pro = very low risk of getting whacked. Best for live dealer NOT electronic roulette machine.
I've watched all of your videos ever since I found you about 2 weeks ago.
These shorts to remind me of your final grade/opinions are top shelf, please keep 'em comin!
Here is a better one, bet both zeros and 32 numbers. 5 per number will give you a profit of 10. If you want a bigger win reduce the bet numbers, higher risk higher reward. My original strategy, you are welcome.
I don't know why CEG calls it Romanovsky when it's actually Romanosky with no v.
Good for 4-5 spins. Recover using dozens or columns OR add 2 column bets on top of this.
Hi Jack! I like the coverage on the felt as there are only 6 whacks. I would use this system to get in for a quick profit and then get out! Great analysis! Robert
I agree. The Romanovsky has a 12.5% return. It’s a flat bet. Do 3 spins max and then get out.
not sure if this is the best place to ask but would it be better to bet the 1245 square and the 2356 square two more whacks but there is a 5ish% chance to jackpot on the 2 and 5 while keeping the rest of the board mostly positive
That’s a system that I would prefer over this one.
I don't understand why you can't just do this. Then add to the 0/00 and do a lambert 1 unit bet increase on it until roll spin 34. This way you would only have 4 numbers that lose and a jackpot pay out on 0/00 if it comes.
I’m a very sure footed person German and Engineer always want a safe bet but it’s never the best option for advancing your winning. They you wife shows up and wants your Meager winnings
Another great video! I would use it for 1 or 2 spins to try and get that quick unit but I would use a different bet for recovery if it failed.
a lot of casino small bet machines don't allow this bet. They limit total board coverage some reason. Idk why.
I used this system last week made $250 with it in over 1 and half hours.
I made my own system now which switches up when you loose and double down when you win. So you basically don't loose large amounts towards the end.
Thanks for this video. You mention the gain of $10.00 but the recovery is bad return at just $10.00. What system do you reccomend for greater returns? Great videos ty from the UK Single zero city.
I'm not sure if electronic/mechanical rowlette will let you cover that many numbers. Looks good though, I'll check it out. Tnx.
At most I bet 3 to win 1. 8 to win 1 is not good. I appreciate the % of possibility to double your buy-in....it's telling.
What's your go to strategy/system?
@@AlixD0829Baccarat
I like 1 minute reviews ❤I don’t like the risk reward for this one though. The best way to play this is get in for 3 wins and get out. But that’s only $30 win. So I give it a D+ 😂
Wow people are saying great coverage, which I have won and lost on Romanosky, but are forgetting the horrible success rate compared to other methods. 56% is almost 1 to 1 odds. The risk and reward coupled with success rate is awful.
❤ your stuff man
I played this system and its actually really good but i think after 5 spins should not play only because the ball tends to hit the only you arent playing after 6 hits
Very risky system for so little return. If you get lucky in the beginning and get on a run then you can cash out ahead, but if you get whacked early you are done, you will never get back.
BLOOOOWSS
I am new to your channel. What is your number one winning strategy 🤔? Thanks
Keep your money in your wallet
@twiz1084 I think you are right ✅️. It seems every strategy fails in the long run. The game is really unbeatable.
An 86.5% coverage on a single 0 table is at least a solid "B"...😎
What other systems are there with higher coverage of the wheel?