In Levinas’ pluralistic ontology, where infinity is a verb, radical openness-in the form of continual deconstruction-is necessitated. Take the mind as the “one-for-the-other” and you have the bondage to metaphysical freedom that the Bible advocates. It’s funny to me that it was up to rabbinic philosophy to offer me a decent explication of Christianity.
In Levinas’ pluralistic ontology, where infinity is a verb, radical openness-in the form of continual deconstruction-is necessitated. Take the mind as the “one-for-the-other” and you have the bondage to metaphysical freedom that the Bible advocates.
It’s funny to me that it was up to rabbinic philosophy to offer me a decent explication of Christianity.