Obviously each case is different. However most often I find that mobility issues tend to begin deep, and spread superficially. IOW, the capsule of the joint seems to be the first 'rate limiting enzyme'...followed by one joint, and then two/multi-joint muscles/tissues. As you see in the video, we use rotational challenges to specify capsular structures. With FR rehabilitation technique, and/or FRC training, we correct deep...and then work progressively more superficial as well.
Unfortunately you are ignoring the convex-concave rule of joint mobilization/manipulation. This is critical in working especially with hip joints. The osteokinematic motion should be opposite arthrokinematic motion (Slide opposite roll). It looks like you are just doing a very basic caudal glide on the hip joint, something that it can not do normally due to anatomy. When moving a convex joint surface on a concave surface, the arthrokinematic motion of caudal glide (or slide) should be coupled with the osteokinematic motion of femoral flexion (imparting roll).
Are you suggesting more hip flexion closer to end range or position of impingement when applying this mob or simply using less inferior force and more posterior?
4 years later and I believe the correct answer would usually be more lateral force Somehow 4 years ago our conscience collective was unable to incorporate, had not yet developed the cognitive space to all for the geometric niceties the head of our golf club* has on our ability to imagine and get it right The *neck+head of our femur being included within our ability to image by creating space for it has, by nature, changed perceptions towards honoring the truth of the more holistic reality that we are
Obviously each case is different. However most often I find that mobility issues tend to begin deep, and spread superficially. IOW, the capsule of the joint seems to be the first 'rate limiting enzyme'...followed by one joint, and then two/multi-joint muscles/tissues. As you see in the video, we use rotational challenges to specify capsular structures. With FR rehabilitation technique, and/or FRC training, we correct deep...and then work progressively more superficial as well.
I have just been diagnosed as having osteoarthritis in my left hip, would following your program be beneficial for this condition?
Fan of your work. To mobilise a joint as strong as the hip, what do you deem to be the limiting factor of movement
Is the hip joint popping during internal rotation something to be concerned about?
Unfortunately you are ignoring the convex-concave rule of joint mobilization/manipulation. This is critical in working especially with hip joints. The osteokinematic motion should be opposite arthrokinematic motion (Slide opposite roll). It looks like you are just doing a very basic caudal glide on the hip joint, something that it can not do normally due to anatomy. When moving a convex joint surface on a concave surface, the arthrokinematic motion of caudal glide (or slide) should be coupled with the osteokinematic motion of femoral flexion (imparting roll).
True in 1979
Are you suggesting more hip flexion closer to end range or position of impingement when applying this mob or simply using less inferior force and more posterior?
4 years later and I believe the correct answer would usually be more lateral force
Somehow 4 years ago our conscience collective was unable to incorporate, had not yet developed the cognitive space to all for the geometric niceties the head of our golf club* has on our ability to imagine and get it right
The *neck+head of our femur being included within our ability to image by creating space for it has, by nature, changed perceptions towards honoring the truth of the more holistic reality that we are
@@wumurphfuthe principles of manual therapy hasn’t changed. He’s right.