Why don't you use some virtualization hypervisor? Maybe you mentioned it but I didn't catch it. You have a 12 core machine, and running a system OS on it, Debian?
btw you want metal brackets, as it will double up as a mother board cooling as well as a sturdy mount, well thats my preference don't know about u just sharing ideas
that's so funny that people think clock speeds are everything. When really its about the architecture of the cores combined with the clock speed and servers are meant to be power efficient. Alot of people think that my fx 8350 is really an octacore but in reality its a quad core cpu with 4 hyper threading cores that don't work unless programs support it and the hyper threading cores are smaller.
The new DirectX 12 has an unlimited cap to CPU CORES needed to play game. The cap for DX11 and most games are 4. DX12 uncaps this limit (faster game-play per core).
Jeremiah Link you're completely wrong about how DX 12 works vs DX 11.2 First of all there's not a "cap". The Operations-per-core concept depends on how the game engine is multithreaded (if at all). Also what they did was bundle draw calls to the GPU which dramatically lowers the CPU usage per draw call.
Vinnie Davis you are correct Sir, also just to point out this would not be good for gaming period as Vinnie stated most game engines being used to do are still barley pushing two cores there may be exceptions to custom engines being edited but be shifty doubtful companies are pointing to the GPS today and dragging the CPU down with it as he states which then is why you would need more memory in your system to feed the processor to have a much better response. Take a computer same specs with 4G ram and one with 32 ram and you will see the difference Everything inside works together as one as you do in life just process faster. Thanks for your help Vinnie Davis
+Егор Матук I should have known well the processor in my computer is a 12 core chip which is 4 compute cores and 8 GCN graphics cores and I thought I wasn't having fun.
Sysadmin Syndicate yes your right and if this was for something other than a home server, it would have been chosen, definitely more suitable for higher business and database servers then i would have.
it dont matter how many cores you have if they are 2.6ghz and you have 50 cores you will have 2.6ghz but you will have more processors so it will be smoother
Servers would be fine even with a 1.5Ghz processor because you need more cores for servers than higher core clocks. Example : Servers would benefit more from 18 cores and 2Ghz than from 4 cores and 5Ghz
Intercepting alien signals the camera mic was, Build computer you did.
Good video, Better audio would be good but otherwise good video!
Rest in peace head phone users.
thanks for the video, but no chance to discover the case brand?
Sata should be a right angle one so that it does not obscure the path of air to the power supply and you should tidy up your cables :)
Why don't you use some virtualization hypervisor? Maybe you mentioned it but I didn't catch it. You have a 12 core machine, and running a system OS on it, Debian?
3:50 Like if you checked your facebook:D
btw you want metal brackets, as it will double up as a mother board cooling as well as a sturdy mount, well thats my preference don't know about u just sharing ideas
Thanks Jedio
that's so funny that people think clock speeds are everything. When really its about the architecture of the cores combined with the clock speed and servers are meant to be power efficient. Alot of people think that my fx 8350 is really an octacore but in reality its a quad core cpu with 4 hyper threading cores that don't work unless programs support it and the hyper threading cores are smaller.
Tell Me about it I got the Same 8350 in my personal
Where you from Rick? Dat accent. Good show dare, and danks for da video mang.
Used to live in Chi now Phx
would have been nice to see Adaptec RAID configuration from beginning.
actually ended up changing over to debian
What is with the wind and purring noises in the camera
the audio sucks big time...! new camera person
What is the soung at start ?
do you know what I hate is the r.a.m. it is always keyed differant
sata all the way FTW
good for gaming
Jeremiah Link the fuck are you talking about
The new DirectX 12 has an unlimited cap to CPU CORES needed to play game. The cap for DX11 and most games are 4. DX12 uncaps this limit (faster game-play per core).
Jeremiah Link
you're completely wrong about how DX 12 works vs DX 11.2
First of all there's not a "cap". The Operations-per-core concept depends on how the game engine is multithreaded (if at all). Also what they did was bundle draw calls to the GPU which dramatically lowers the CPU usage per draw call.
Vinnie Davis you are correct Sir, also just to point out this would not be good for gaming period as Vinnie stated most game engines being used to do are still barley pushing two cores there may be exceptions to custom engines being edited but be shifty doubtful companies are pointing to the GPS today and dragging the CPU down with it as he states which then is why you would need more memory in your system to feed the processor to have a much better response. Take a computer same specs with 4G ram and one with 32 ram and you will see the difference
Everything inside works together as one as you do in life just process faster.
Thanks for your help Vinnie Davis
Meant GPU not GPS dawn auto correct
because it really doesnt help on a linux base system more for windows
what case is that?
I dont rememberr off hand
why the heck do you need this expensive server??
Wow it is ether Itranium or a XENON I just wish had that sort of money.
Intel doesn't produce itanium anymore. It's not a Xeon because there are not long Xeons. Its an AMD opteron processor.
+Егор Матук I should have known well the processor in my computer is a 12 core chip which is 4 compute cores and 8 GCN graphics cores and I thought I wasn't having fun.
I got server 2012 for pretty much free i have some friends at microsoft
changed system to debian
Opteron 64 than Xeon EM64T
dont exists your forum
forum exist rickteg.com or rickteg.net
I hope your not using SATA RAID.
Sysadmin Syndicate What should he be using then?
SCSI/SAS Raid is much more reliable.
Sysadmin Syndicate yes your right and if this was for something other than a home server, it would have been chosen, definitely more suitable for higher business and database servers then i would have.
Sysadmin Syndicate and parallel SCSI is dead its all only about SAS anymore
RickTEG haha I actually work with a few SCSI servers still.
12 core and only2.6
it dont matter how many cores you have if they are 2.6ghz and you have 50 cores you will have 2.6ghz but you will have more processors so it will be smoother
12 core and only2.6
Its a server not a gaming pc /facepalm
Fankie why not?
Jeremiah Link because server CPU are different than desktop CPU. And made for different tasks. And that why they don't need 4 GHz on a board.
Servers would be fine even with a 1.5Ghz processor because you need more cores for servers than higher core clocks.
Example :
Servers would benefit more from 18 cores and 2Ghz than from 4 cores and 5Ghz