Prosecutor argues defendants charged with Arbery death can't claim self-defense
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2021
- Prosecutor Linda Dunikoski asked the jury to reject Travis McMichael's testimony that he shot Ahmaud Arbery in self-defense after he tried to take his shotgun: "If you are the initial unjustified aggressor, you don't get to claim self-defense."
UPDATES: abcn.ws/3oNMrVT
#ahmaudarbery #arbery #arberytrial #trial #court #law #news #breakingnews
SUBSCRIBE to ABC News on RUclips: bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Latest updates: abcnews.go.com/
Watch FULL EPISODES on Hulu: abcn.ws/3bzvQQn
This was NOT self defense. They hunted that man like an animal. They took the law into their own hands and played, judge, jury, and executioner. They are in the wrong. It doesn't matter if he was 50 miles from home, these guys had zero right to do what they did.
What law were they enforcing if they took it into thier own hands? It's literally suicide to charge someone holding a weapon. Describe the wrong of thier actions if you would.
White Jury : NOT GUILTY on ALL charges!!!
@@marksasoldier following and attempting to illegally detain someone on pure speculation?
@@marksasoldier who's comment did you read? Not mine. Stop putting words in my mouth. I never said they enforced any laws. In fact I accused them of being judge/jury/ executioners.
They pursued him for 5 minutes with guns, cornered him, and forced Ahmaud to defend himself once trapped.
These 3 guys are wishing that the trial was in wisconsin.
Lmao
This prosecutor would have accepted Kyle Rittenhouse's self defense, since neither of those 3 points were true.
@@pite9 exactly correctly. “If you provoke someone to attack you, you can’t claim self defense when you defend yourself.”
Think about that when you remember that the first scum bag that Rittenhouse had to shoot was screaming to his face the words “Shoot me, ni**a.”
Cold Blooded Murder.
There's no self defense.
^ Facts.
⚖
He never should have grabbed the gun.
Exactly that! You bring a gun and demand a person to surrender and the person defense himself against you, you cannot then kill the guy and claim self defense.
You can if you didn't fire before combat begins, hence the police drawing on you and giving you commands. Or are the police wrong in 100% of cases in ensuring they can handle a suspect that they have no clue whether he's/she's armed. This is a stupid arguement.
@@marksasoldier police have certain exceptions. These were normal citizens. They provoked him for a while. Cops dont slowly chase u as u jog with a drawn weapon when u have done nothing. Even destroying property isnt justified in shooting someone. Lives take precedence over property in not only law enforcement but every ems case.
@@marksasoldier Yes that applies to police. The fact that one of them was former Coast guard and other former policemen means nothing. They had no legal authority over Aubrey. A group of random strangers holding you at gunpoint and threatening to "blow your head off" negates all of that. He had every right to fight for his life with guns drawn on him along with the verbal threat of being shot.
I love her. She's my favorite prosecutor I've seen yet.
She is good
When you murder somebody, you can't claim self defense.
Rittenhouse did.
If someone breaks into your home with a weapon , you can claim self defense if you defend yourself
@@eliteinventor I think almost anything can be used as weapon in your own home. You only get one chance using a lamp. If you shot someone breaking in. Make sure he lands inside the house. It's a big deal.
Ahmaud Arbery thought that he was being abducted 💯
Guilty as charge!
Can someone tell Florida 🧐...please!😠
Well said. Im curious how someone thinks any of these 3 would apply in the rittenhouse case.
Wow this lady nailed it!!
Jurors for shittenhouse misunderstood the assignment smh.
@Vince Versage want to try spelling that again before you try to use it on someone? 🤣
Ignent. Lets go brandon.
@@dylanferrell4673 he must've been one of them. 🤣
You're a racist
Naw. Kyle killed terrorists. That was his assignment.
loved this lady! bravo! she did a outstanding job!
Three laws for the three stooges
🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤣😭😂
Hey we needed her in that trial last week.
Totally different kyle was about to be killed he was being assaulted by three men with weapons and you don't think that self-defense he's a hundred percent innocent it wouldn't have mattered if God was the prosecutor not guilty man is always going to be not guilty no matter his color his race Justice was served 100%
@@zombiewolf3244 he went there with the intentions to kill people.
@@luvmypetsrhanie1144 you could have just told us you’re biased and didn’t watch any of the trial, clown….
CNN or MSNBC? Which one did you let brainwash you?
This prosecutor was needed in the Rittenhouse trial
Yep. She would have blown their self-defense bs outdoor.
It really wouldnt have mattered. The situation was much different
She would have agreed with Rittenhouse dummy. She said you are “the aggressor” if you are provoking an attack. The first shots were fired when a man screaming “Shoot me, ni**a,” was chasing after and throwing things at Kyle. How is yelling “shoot me,” not a provocation for someone to shoot you?
@@prettynormalguy3169 Rittenhouse was provoking the attack, dummy. The only reason why the crowd retaliated was because he was hold a gun, and shooting people.
@@exgamer07 you CLEARLY didn’t watch the trial. So I’ll ignore you. But do feel free to continue embarrassing yourself if you’d like…
Keep up the good work lawyer 🙏
But Zimmerman got off.
Is it normal for opposing counsel to interrupt counsel's closing arguments? because it sure sounded like mansplaining to me.
Except in WI‼️
U really dont see any difference in these cases?
Three people were attacking Kyle with physical harm. Those 3 men were not justified to do what they tried to do. Kyle claimed self defense and the verdict was right. The verdict against these 3 men was right.
"YOU CANNOT CLAIM SELF-DEFENSE...."
The jurors in rittenhouse's case did not understand the law about self-defence.
Arbery was the instigator of the event. Provocation by unreasonable presence. He had no reason to be there....
Different state, different laws. I would advise that you learn what you’re talking about before commenting. I don’t like the Rittenhouse verdict, but the Wisconsin laws allowed his actions.
How so? Kyle was not the aggressor, and the people who attacked him first where not only racists, but also convicted felons
@Vince Versage agreed 1000%
@@user-rb1yf4he9q that's too bad you think it was okay for them grown men to attack attack a minor with deadly weapons with skateboards one of them had a handgun and you think he didn't have the right to defend himself that's sad that verdict was 1000% correct he should have never been charged it's all political and racist that he was ever even charged no matter what his color if he was black white orange you would have been not guilty
Roddie would have done better with a public defender 😆
Lol
Keep up the good work prosecutor
GUILTY
Sounds like their guilty to me….
It's over. A jury of their peers FOUND THEM GUILTY AS CHARGED. AS THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN MOVE ON.
Those dirty bastards they provocted him, rot in jail, and may you be terrified every day of you life.
Soooo what happed in the Zimmerman case ?
If what this prosecutor is true, how was George Zimmerman claim it and succeed ?
And let's not forget Zimmerman!
Warms my heart to know that Travis,Greg and Roddie will be obeying orders given by black correction officers for the rest of their lives😂
Can we use this on the police
Damnnnnnnn Linda
DISLIKE
THEY ARE HIDING THE DISLIKE # GIVE A LIKE TO THE COMMENT SHOW YOUR DISLIKE
"And that's the law." There...
Tow cops shot one black man three cops shot 41 time claim self defense.
I agree even if it wasn't the law
Those @$$holed are going to get off . The cop who gave the okay for them to go after him should be on trial, too.
The oldest man was a former police officer. He should’ve known better. The father knew the law but let his racism lead himself against Aubrey. He led his son to think it was okay to carry out the shooting. Claiming self defense without the video, they could have walked away from court free. They thought that if they recorded their racism would help their case. It backfired for them.
Thankfully they didn’t…
There's so many Law Enforcement officers that need to be prosecuted because they claim that defense always
They'll still walk...
Straight into solitary confinement!
Are you sure about that 😂
Amen!
⚖🕵♂️🕵♀️🕵
Lets go Brandon.
Have you people really got nothing better to do than spam the profoundly vapid slogan "lEt'S gO bRaNdOn" on the comment section of a news channel? Seriously, get a life. 🤦♂️
Thats GG
Agreed!
🕊#MsWarriorSaint
In the 1960’s these men would be given the key to the city and paraded as defenders of their community. Now they are locked up even when video evidence exonerates them. Such is the life in a diverse low trust society.
(If I get off topic Abit"), I hope ladies have heard what she said about provoking someone, becoz ladies love to provoke men and wen men respond to those attacks ladies always take the victim card
You cant assume they are aggressors. Thats hearsay and opinion not proof. To convict you need to prove the crime not assume. She is assuming just as Ahmaud assumed it is a two way street at worst it was unintentional manslaughter they didnt "hunt" him thats emotional appeal not logical or legal. The were unjustly charged.
BS
They actually did hunt him down had you watched the trial. Chased him and threatened his life numerous times before the shooting.
I can tell you how it is going to be....
mistrial by verdict of 11 Not Guilty and 1 blackman guilty !
@Your Husbands Girlfriend : tit for tat ... We got Brittany Grinder, she's on her way to Siberia Gulag for a long time.
Funny how all 3 of these apply to Rittenhouse yet it somehow when to trial and the media is still trying to stoke hatred and somehow race with that.
Yes i know this isn't that case but still I can't not notice the contrast
Here, the guy chased down a guy out for a jog with his gun, the other case, three guys chased down the guy with the gun - huge difference.
How do these 3 apply in the rittenhouse case? He wasnt the initial aggressor. He wasnt committing a felony. He also didnt provoke anyone. Its a messed up situation for sure but a violent protest isnt the same as a jog in the suburbs
@@kylealexander7024 Exactly my point. The prosecutor gave 3 points of self defense (and why it wasn't true in this case) And those lined up perfectly for The circumstances that Rittenhouse was in. It was embarrassing that even went to trial.
I think she just gave these three people an out, Correct but what are the other laws in the state that allow these men to initiate contact. I watch the entire court case before making any assumption if I do because I’m not a lawyer or defense attorney or judge now here comes the heat good thing I am Mexican since it’s going to get hot in the reply’s
Explain yourself?
So they defended themselves? I dont know anything about this trial. But the last prosecutor that said this stuff was very wrong. Kyle was defending himself.
This is not the same as Kyle. In this case they chased him in a truck until Ahmaud had to defend himself.
@@serfrazier8301 Untrue. At no point was an altercation necessary. Calling the police was the correct choice. Charging someone weilding deadly force is seriously the dumbest game anyone can play.
@@marksasoldier Charging someone who has chased you to the point where you have to defend yourself if a natural human response. He flighted until he had to fight.
@@marksasoldier Charging someone who has chased you to the point where you have to defend yourself if a natural human response. He flighted until he had to fight.
@@serfrazier8301
Arbery was "neurologically atypical".
He was a criminal tormenting the neighborhood, they took matters into their own hands and now they are paying for it. Everyone in this story sucks, including Ahmed the thief.
@Deonna Trice ope, they did call the police. Multiple times.
@@SKEPTICPROD they actually didn’t. Had you watched the trial.
@@hustlengrind8833 yes they did, and he was "jogging" in work boots miles away from where he lives. You're so clearly misinformed about this case.
@@SKEPTICPROD you’re taking about yourself. He had on running shoes, it’s on VIDEO. 😂 Way above your pay grade kid.
@@hustlengrind8833 you are so seriously misinformed.
Im praying for a good outcome like in the Rittlehouse trial 🙏🙏
The jury should hear about Arbery's criminal history. Timothy Walmsley is an activist judge. 🦘
They did. Just like they heard about all of these 3 guy’s past history of hate & racist views. That’s why they’ve been convicted on a state & federal level for a hate crime. Smh
@@jyoung9298 Ahmaud Arbery treated petty theft like a full time job. Whenever he got caught, which was often, he wouldn't hesitate to use violence like he did with Travis McMichael.
The jury never heard about it,
and neither did you.
You on dope or dog food 🤔
@@imthebadguy3225So does stealing justify killing someone?
clear case of self-defense. and he successfully defended his neighborhood and community
Clear case huh? Interesting.
🤨🤣🤣🤣
Arbrey killed him self when he tray to take tje gun from them.self defense.thats the law
In a June 2018 call to 911 his own mother warns the operator that Arbery has a *mental condition* that had "escalated", and would make him violent if officers were to aggressive with him. 🦘
They chased the man down in a truck and cornered him. Arbrey tried to take the gun in self defence. He was the only person that acted in self defence that day.
@@ICSpots 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂 that could be very true
SMH!
He killed himself huh? That's why those racist demons are rotting in a prison cell for the rest of their natural lives!