SOVEREIGN CITIZEN Held In Contempt By STRICT Kansas Judge!!! RIGHT TO TRAVEL FAIL!!!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 фев 2024
- Hey guys, today we have a new video for your enjoyment. Today, we have a STRICT Kansas Judge DESTROYING A Pro Se SOVEREIGN CITIZENand holding him in contempt of court... Play stupid games win stupid prizes. This is just another example of Karens being Karens in court and getting owned on camera.
To Support The Channel :
PayPal Donation : paypal.me/TeamSkepticYT
Become A Channel Member : / @teamskeptic
Join Our Patreon : / teamskeptic
TeeSpring - teespring.com/stores/team-ske...
#Court #CourtCam #TeamSkeptic 
Развлечения
For someone without a license, he shows up on Zoom repeatedly in a car.
Solid gold, baby!
That’s exactly what I commented. If i was the judge i would have did everything in my power to give him another ticket.
I legit do not understand it either. I find the legal system to be comically inept which is probably by design.
@@BearPawSwipeNo one here SAW him drive. You want to throw him in jail, what if you were sitting somewhere and judt got thrown in jail because someone thought you might do,something? Would you find that less inept? Those same laws you want to impress upon others will be used against you.
Maybe he's writing his auto-biography?
Sovereign citizens should be forced to appear in court and not by zoom. This way they can be held in contempt of court for their actions.
Yes, and they should be required to accept counsel unless they can prove the necessary understanding and decorum to be ALLOWED to appear _pro se._
They still can be, they're legally in the courtroom for all meaningful purposes while on Zoom. It also allows the extremely useful ability to mute them, which is quite difficult in real life.
@@UpnorthHere You are so right!
@@CruelestChrisIdk, I’ve seen duct tape used in court 😂, but typically they just have them removed and continue on with the hearing.
ABSOLUTELY!
the injured party are the people who have to listen to this bs.
Whenever they say "jurisdiction" or "admiralty law" or "upper case"...
should be an immediate contempt of court to be served for 30 days.
He fully understands but he just wants to stall and aggravate everyone.
Why I can’t watch
Exactly! They do all of this ON PURPOSE to drag it all out as long as possible!
That comment is reflective of arguably the most famous defendant in the USA as well... spout legal nonsense and stall deflect and whine.
Nah he's really stupid
I'm not so sure like the narrator said, informing him of the nature of the charges is different than HIM UNDERSTANDING/ COMPREHENDING THEM.
"They're a social virus that's spreading across America faster than legs and eggs at a breakfast brothel." Team Skeptic is a savage and spits out pure gold.
Lmao he totally is!
He’s reading from a script because he thinks that he can stall the process by asking till he gets the answer he wants. He’s just stupid enough to think that this script he bought would work.
He now has a vested interest in not understanding the nature of the court he’s being tried in because he paid money for the documents telling him he must be tried only in a common law or maritime court.
The judge could probably have short circuited the conversation by saying that the 10A lets states form additional courts as required.
The judge should have told him “ you interrupt me once more and it’s 30 days for contempt of court “
Of course he’s doing the call from his car where he’s continuing to drive without a license. The arrogance and ignorance is astounding.
But the 14th amendment gives him the right to see the admiral about these road pirates. And I think it says they have to pay him in gold doubloons for trespassing on his vessel.
TBC
@@ED-es2qv I got to say it took me a while to stop laughing from this post. Nice one. Lol.
He should then be picked up and there is the proof that he actually provided the detectives with, sovtards are so stupid.
Yeah, but so is the county attorney (and she's on the clock). Way unprofessional.
Judge Webster is much too patient and nice with the Sovtards she has to deal with.
Great judge but waay too soft here.
Judges need to put on the kid gloves for these lowlives, otherwise there'll be cries of """ayo dass RAYSISS"""
Agreed. I'd have him away for a month contempt
She is far too soft 🤷
This judge needs to learn how to deal with these people… she has come across them often enough now to know… shut down the stupidity & stop wasting the court & everyone’s time
Why do people (including judges) put up with this rubbish. He should have been held in contempt immediately and an arrest warrant issued.
Yes.
I think it’s CYA. Treat them with kid gloves and there isn’t any way they can prove the judge was unfair or violated their rights.
Judge stop already!
Hold him in Contempt
After the sovcit spouts off his "admiralty law" argument the prosecutor should start his case with "Ahoy! Matey."
Darn you, now there’s diet soda on my dashboard! Or should I call it the bow, matey?
Or “oh captain my captain”
judge puts on an eye patch... bailiff switches to a cutlass... banner drops down "congratulations you found the secret loophole and don't have to ever pay taxes again!"
The state is requesting a keelhauling followed by 30 days in the brig.
Or walk the plank
"Sir, you better go back to law school because I don't think you got the education you need to represent yourself." Priceless. Just priceless. lol
I don't understand how someone could be so strict and demanding of others, but such a pathetic failure at something as basic as eating an appropriate amount of food. The judge may be completely correct in this instance, but it is really disturbing that someone so fundamentally lacking in morals is able to stand in judgement over others.
@@psn64sat63😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@psn64sat63Who TF are you to determine what an ‘appropriate amount of food’ for her to eat is? It’s, at least for the moment, a free country, and there’s no evidence of her doing anything ‘immoral’ here. She is under no obligation to conform to your body composition preferences and you have no idea what ‘amount’ of food she even eats is.
Simply put, if you have to ask the JUDGE anything about the legal system IN COURT, there's NO WAY you should be representing yourself! The moment this guy asks "What jurisdiction am I being tried under?" the response should be "If you don't know, you're not fit to represent yourself and I'm gonna have to appoint you counsel" -- Period.
They should be sent for a physic evaluation test at their expense
That doesn't work either because they end up refusing the counsel anyway and not cooperating.
Not really you do have the right to make bad decisions !
@@Saragold58 Mental too.
they can’t force you to though unfortunately. These people are incredibly arrogant and don’t care about the law or society. A guy like him will just blame racism and keep doing the same dumb BS.
The word "Responsibility" has NO meaning to a sovereign citizen!
Or intelligence !!!
He’s not a sovereign citizen, he’s a grifter who most likely lives off the state,along with the rest of his family … and friends.
Dudes IQ cannot be over 50. There is simply no way.
Now is that maritime or common law IQ?
It’s at most half that amount…
OBJECTION!!! my IQ was traveling...
50 might be a little generous 😂
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead
The judges are becoming more bold and are handling Sov Cits in more and better ways all the time! 👏🏻
Phew I was pissee he got til
October for a jury trial
None of these traffic tickets deserve jury trial but they deserve the max
I have seen that recently. Hopefully it is true and just not what our favorite channels are showing us.
This is not an example of it. She was way too patient with that idiot
Judges should be permitted to tell clowns like this to stop being a SOVTARD !!!!!!!
I agree Judge Simpson would not have let it go that long
He knows everything he's saying is nonsense, he's lying in an attempt to frustrate the court process
It's the adult version of "la la la I'm not listening" by holding their hands to their ears.
Stupid can't be reasoned with, or have a normal conversation with. This level of stupidity I can't deal with or tolerate. It has always been one of my pet peeves.
I absolutely agree I have never wanted to throat punch someone so much in my life what a total clown 🤡
One day a judge will tell a SovCit If you cannot understand the jurisdiction or the charges against them then they are not fit to represent themselves. That seems like a no-brainer to me. The vast majority of us understand what statutory law is.
It happened in Judge McBernie's court. A judge cannot arbitrarily do that. The judge masterfully lead this long time career criminal exactly on the spot marked X and refused to let him get away with it.
Ud think but I'm not sure the judges are bright enough to know they are being played and don't wanna risk being called a racisms
I've seen a video where exactly that happened. Numbskull tried to challenge jurisdiction, Judge was "ok go ahead." He started spewing the usual nonsense, and the Judge cut him off. Found he wasn't competent to represent himself.
Even if one doesn't fully understand _what_ statutory law is, normal people _recognize_ F'ing around with the court system can cost you money and freedom.
I don't, but then again, I am german. We have a different law system.
“Your state of delusion doesn’t count.” Lmao. Magellan
Until
The Justice system has actual penalties I can’t watch these trials
This boy got on my LAST DAMN NERVE! The very last one I got... and then he seared it at the end when he thought that he didn't have to show up for court in person!
MY LAST DAMN NERVE!
I know just breath in through the nose and out through the mouth❤ You should see videos on frauditors
Em, he's not a boy!? He's a grown man! He only talks and acts like a pre-teen!
I would like to see him go to jail
Find him in contempt. Stop all this....
I’m getting spoiled because your last few sov cits got strict judges and contempt
Judge Webster way too lenient
Too be honest don’t want her videos
I get too annoyed
That’s why she wants him in court. He will find himself in contempt within minutes and be escorted to jail for it.
She did.
Judge you can't fix stupid.
Ron white
Sovereign citizens are the living embodiment of the old saying, "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."
Can’t make them think.
As a law-abiding citizen of the United States of America, I take offense to these people, claiming to understand amendments, but completely either purposely, not understanding them or purposely Twisting them to fit whatever slimy goal they have of getting out of facing accountability.
Ignorance and arrogance combined = this guy .
Clearly, he’s sitting in the driver seat while he’s taking his zoom call judge
OMG I have no words for this man child. 🤦🏼♀️
Lock him up.
I have 2 … Societal Leech.
That was this past Tuesday and Wednesday/yesterday.
The hilarity of his appearing by zoom for driving w/o license BEHIND THE STEERING WHEEL OF A CAR.
I would like to point out that Judge Webster knows she is internet famous now so she is wearing a full face of makeup and a bright red lip. Love to see it!
Her choice of glasses is terrible!
@@joeimbesi5361 She is a professional Judge and you are an amateur 😀
And a new do.
@@joeimbesi5361 - Oh, I think they are fly!
I’m moving the red lipstick. Is she wearing new glasses ❤
How is this behaviour NOT automatic contempt of court?
He did get charged with contempt of court. Your comment is ignorant.
It should be but I think some judges don't know what's happening initially or they assume the defended might be mentally impaired.
It is annoying when judges entertain their nonsense. They should start shutting them down once they start talking about "maritime" or "admiralty". It's a waste of the court's time.
She's answered him a 100 times and he still sits there and acts like it's her fault that he doesn't understand it. That's why she said you need a lawyer or somebody to help you. Somebody who understands this stuffbecause you clearly don't. But I think he's having trouble admitting that he doesn't understand....because he thinks he does understand.
TBC
Self delusion is like being in a coma. Nobody can really do much to bring you out of it they just have to wait and hope you wake the f*ck up.
Simply asked and answered !...Move on!
If he's in San Antonio, there's an international airport just a few miles away. He can easily be in Kansas in a few hours.
I don't think the airport is going to let him "Travel" without a Drivers License or a valid Government ID. They won't be accepting his Moorish ID gobleygook.
All of this for driving without a license. My guess is that this guy, like most of them, never heard or cared about any of this sovcit nonsense until they got into trouble with the law and wanted to find a way out of it. Because they refuse to take any responsibility for their actions. I think the majority of them know their "legal argument" is pure BS.
Anything but be responsible citizens
His next appearance here will likely be courtesy of Code Blue Cam 😂
Another misconception - The 1st Amendment allows you to redress any governmental grievances . Actually, it allows you to PETITION the government for a redress of grievances. Call flooding a librarian, city clerk, or police station dispatch a thousand miles away from you isn't what the Founding Fathers envisioned, I suspect.
This judge doesnt understand that she is supposed to get tired of his endless jurisdiction arguments and dismiss his case out of frustration.
Why is he asking questions? Judges don't take questions especially if it's STUPID QUESTIONS - WHERE'S YOUR ATTORNEY???
He’s asking questions because he IS a moron.
I’m a Brit but even I can understand the basics of the US legal system and see all of this maritime/common law stuff is bs.
It’s just them trying to evade responsibility for their actions.
I feel bad for the judge. She said the same answers over and over again. She is trying but this guy refuses to listen and just waste her time. Judge I thank you for your service. As for the defendant he needs the six months in jail to read a law book.
@TheGuyver360 Agree 💯% lock his azz upI let him loose in the Law Library see how much he understands the answer to the same question he asked over and over 😂🤣🤪🤪
I don't feel bad for her. That's simply what you get for being too patient. Another example of a judge that is the opposite of strict.
Continuing to run his mouth thinking he’s entitled to do so is seriously disrespectful.
Judge Webster was schooling him very well about the laws, if you don’t think laws doesn’t apply to you why u in zoom court for , if you want to travel try ride bus or take a taxi or walk on your foot to your destination, when you behind the wheel dummy u needs a valid driver license,insurance, license plate…
Yep, the license isn't "for travelling" it's for operating a motor vehicle on public roads.
Dude is smack-bang in the middle of the USA, hundreds (thousands?) of miles from the nearest coastline. That said, what's the probability he's being tried under ADMIRALITY LAW? Does he know what the words mean?!
I've got a dollar that says he's never even seen the sea...
@@thedivinemrm5832he likely has never even seen a ship let alone the sea. Nearest thing hes. Seen to the sea is a puddle after a rain shower 😃
He knows it's not admiralty. He just thinks admiralty and common law are the only two options, so when the judge says "neither," it somehow invalidates the charges against him. Doesn't matter how many judges and lawyers tell him he's wrong, he thinks he has a chance to get off scot free if he continues to do it his own way rather than cooperate.
None of them knows what any of this means. They all just repeat what they heard from the last YT video lol
Texas is on the coastline (Gulf of Mexico), it's the southern coast of the USA. You seem to be under the impression that the US only has two coastlines on the east and west sides. Texas is literally known as the third coast state. I think he said he was in San Antonio, that's close enough to the coast to spend the day at the beach and be home for dinner. (about a 2 hour drive)
There's still zero chance of him being tried under admiralty law, but your estimate of his distance to the coast is about as wrong as his request to be tried under admiralty law. Maritime/Admiralty law pertains to incidents that occur at sea or in “navigable waters” (e.g., lakes, rivers, and wetlands) of the United States, so it doesn't even require a coastline, it just requires to be on water usable by a watercraft. However, it also doesn't replace local jurisdiction if there is overlapping state law (such that a lake is covered by both state and maritime), in the same way state law doesn't replace federal where both can apply jurisdictionally.
Anyway, none of that matters, he was on land, violating a state law, nothing else matters at that point in relation to jurisdiction.
21:44 ACK!
Write out the warrant and cite him for contempt x3!
26:06 Thank goodness for the ADA!
27:23 LOL! She's making it so he needs to be in Kansas in person! I love it! ❤️ 😅
Judges should always refuse to answer pro-se's questions if they could be answered by an attorney
I appreciate the judges humanity, demonstrated as she tries to he reasonable with this fool, but they need to start shutting these idiots down.
The judge let him continue far too long with it.
@@rhgamecock1 absolutely.
I’m 17 min in and done! These judges need to shut this bs down straight out of the gate.
Criminal is virtually incomprehensible
Does he really want to go up against Jill Gillett? Eh. His mistake.
who ever started this sovcit bs is ripping people off.
Why don't the judges ask these people if they know what admiralty law is?
Very good point, would like to hear that answer! 😂
I guarantee this missing link couldn’t even spell admiralty … or law. People give these grifters far too much credit, he can’t read and has no idea what he’s regurgitating.
Order a competency hearing, assign a public defender, and rule he can't represent himself.
How many times does she have to tell him he’s under State law? He’s got verbal diarrhea lol. He’s actually trying to CORRECT the judge on the law lol!
And may I point out… the fool has no license… yet he PULLED OVER TO TESTIFY 😂🤣
He uses the Darrell Brooks Hand book of law. Because that worked so well. Go out and arrest for driving again since he is in court in a car@
They always say the have a question but they never listen to the answer.
Yeah they ignore it because it doesn't conform to the insane conspiracy theory they believe in.
LMFAO while he sits in the driver's seat of a car!!
This guy is not going to show up for his jury trial. The judge might as well issue that warrant now. He says it's too far to drive but he doesn't have a license.
If he didn't insist on being such an a-hole the judge might have been a bit more accommodating. But he did so she isn't and that's all she wrote!
The only thing Sov Cits care about less than the law are the answers to the questions they keep asking.
I am just waiting for her to quote Chris Tucker when he says "Do you speak any english? Do you understand the words that coming out of my mouth?"
Why do they entertain these people for so long?
His eyes are so vacant. He keeps asking questions but he looks like a soulless puppet repeating a script. The lights are on but nobody's home.
For the love of God make him stop! Someone who loves him needs to give an immediate intervention🤐😐🙄
Listening to him is like listening to Boomhauer from King of the Hill.
3rd time repeating same question should hold a contempt fine and jail
He has to cross 3 states and 650 miles. It should take 10.5 hours. Factoring in breaks he can do it in 12. Now not having a license will slow that, but he can do it in theory.
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
Nowhere does it say you have the right to _understand_ the charges against you, only that you have a right to be _informed._
That’s how I understand it too. Say you’re a foreigner , you step in to their country, you are subjected to their law. Plain and simple. No need to sign a contract
It might be possible to explain it to them in the form of an "implied contract", like sitting down to order dinner at a restaurant; you implicitly agree to pay for it. When you drive your car on the public ways you implicitly agree to follow the laws and become subject to ALL OF THE LAWS of that jurisdiction (federal, state, county, municipal, if not also tribal).
@@UpnorthHere right right, implied..I agree
You don't have to get a lawyer, but the court doesn't have to explain every detail of law to your satisfaction.
I love the fact that the prosecutor very clearly answered the common sovcit nonsense about consent. It always riles me up that they think laws only apply if they give some sort of formal consent. I'd like them to try that in other more restrictive countries. Would love them to go somewhere like Singapore, then argue "no you can't beat me for having drugs since I didn't consent to any contract with your country and you don't have jurisdiction." It's asinine, and a kindergartner can figure this out. Are you actively within the country? Then you've consented to the laws there. Are you actively within a particular state? Then you've consented to the laws there. Are you actively within a county or city? Then you've consented to the laws there.
Criminal jurisdiction is primarily geographical. You enter a territory, you're subject to their laws.
Just because a judge is a little folksy and patient doesn't mean she's a pushover... don't poke the bear in the black robe 🤣😎... I love this judge. As always Skeptic I really enjoy both your content and comments. ❤
She got pushed all over the courthouse in the previously mentioned case.
He is just wasting the court’s time
I LOVE THIS JUDGE no Bull$hit no drama just straight business
They're going to keep asking the same questions over and over because they don't ever agree with the answers. It happens every time. They won't accept anything outside their mistaken sovcit interpretation. And if and when any charges get dismissed, they consider it a "win" in court. It's infuriating and a huge waste of the court's time.
Absolutely agree.
She has more patience than most judges. He was spinning around chasing his tail when the judge answered his question several times. I think these individuals do this to make the judge say something they not suppose to and use in court to get their case thrown. They should have a pamphlet that answer every dumb question these sovereign idiots spew each time...
Maybe he should stop axing and start asking
Played FAFO and lost. Get your ass to Kansas.
Mr. Kirvin's ability to represent himself is insane. 70 IQ folks need help. Mr. Kirvin needs more help than most.
One of the best judges ever! No bs with those stupid clowns . He def needs to stop the drugs
It's really admirable how these judges still have the patience to explain things. I would probably be so fed up that I would simply had told them that they should have consulted with a lawyer beforehand, and continued with the process, only addressing relevant questions and telling them if they bring up any bs that it's irrelevant and move on
He keeps going back to...If this is criminal law jurisdiction, then where is "injured party"
Criminal lawsuit does NOT require an injured party.
Only civil lawsuits require an injured party.
Facts and logic are Kryptonite to sovcits -- they have to avoid them at all costs.
I will never understand these people being so delusional that they think they can go and do the job of a lawyer and instead end up hurting their case
Insufficient education might play a role. Not one of them has ever actually read the constitution or any of the laws and cases they love to cite. They feel overwhelmed by life and this bs gives them the illusion they can decide some things in their life and blame the rest on someone else.
They can decide. It is just that simple: If you want to benefit from society you have play by the rules this society has set for themselves to protect their own. You can't just cherry pick whatever fits you best and ignore the rest. That is not how society works. It is not how life works.
If you want to change the society you live in - engage in it. Or go somewhere else.
I have two words for you: Alina. Habba.
Just having a lawyer isn't always enough. They must be competent.
Why do people voluntarily choose to make their life this difficult? They never win their stupid SovCit arguements.
They do it to frustrate the court. That's it.
Dude!!! I almost died!! “Spreading faster than legs and eggs at a breakfast brothel” 😂🤣🤪 first time hearing that one. Too funny.
"Are you saying I need a lawyer to understand some secret jurisdiction only known by the bar association?"
No, she's told you that you're under State jurisdiction, known to 99% of the population -- something that most states have had for 150 years or more.
The judge shouldn't tolerate his pretend stupidity. I hope its pretend. She should've held him in contemp awhile ago. She also She should say if he's too stupid to know he's not on the water or to understand he can't say he isn't a citizen so the constitution can't be used, then seek psychiatric help.
He is Ignorant and sticking to his script, having been assured that he will get the charges dropped for lack of jurisdiction by whoever sold him the script.
Judge Webster has way more patience than I have.
The intentional ignorance is completely frustrating. The sixth amendment doesn't say that.
"Sir, you have the right to know and I have informed you. Based on your response, what you seem to lack is the understanding of that answer."
Go Judge Webster! you rock!
How so? She basically let him run her court, talk in circles, and did absolutely nothing to discourage his BS.
Love Judge Webster, she has so much patience in trying to explain to these baffoons why they are wrong, but they just dont listen, they only hear what they want sadly.
I love how the judge gave old matey a 3rd grade civics lesson on how laws are passed.
She needs a way to send them to the child-care room at the courthouse and have them put on the animated feature of "how a law gets made", or whatever.
Her face🤣🤣🤣. She is like if I have to answer this f’ing question one more time this week
This guy is high as hell….and showed up to court in his car ….and Jesus his rapid fire responses….
His brain is having a fight within it self, information overload😂😂😂
He's stalling and scamming out his part of the DUI offense 👍
“I have a question judge”, “ask your lawyer, sir”. The questions are always the same and they never “understand” the answers. They clearly understand they just don’t like the answers. Like toddlers.
I had a boss like this guy. He would ask a question, if he didn't like the answer he would ask it again and again over and over. I would would always say, my answer hasn't changed since the last time you asked me this a minute ago. There should be a reset button on people like this.
Skeptic, calling this guy an idiot is an insult to idiots everywhere