What I like about Audis in general is that almost all of them have a dual personality, with the RS5 being the most pronounced. Keep them below 4000 RPM (or in "comfort" mode) and it's a car you can let your partner drive without any special training to go shopping or generally cart around in style, However, go above 4000 RPM and the nature of the beast changes dramatically, especially if you also open the exhaust valves. In that mode, it goes from 0 to illegal in under 5 seconds without any fuss or wheel spin, but even then you remain in control. However, going faster doesn't mean getting somewhere quicker: at 8000 RPM, that nice V8 uses SEVEN litres of fuel per minute (translated: a whole tank goes in under 15 minutes) so you'll spend a lot of time standing still and refuelling :).
As Mat says, if you've got free tires and unlimited track time, that M3 is it. If you expect to drive on roads, where fishtailing can end your day, it may be slightly less fun.
@@jebusglatze1285 Not in fit and finish. And the RS5 looks and sounds better imho. I'd add that the RS5 has untapped potential. With a few mild performance upgrades (intake, exhaust, suspension (coilovers, sway bars), brakes (braided brake lines, pads), tyres + tune), the RS5 would compete head to head with the M3 on the track.
@craig sawyer did u pick one. I want a 2011-13 e92 comp. Or b8.5 rs5.. Im moving to tahoe area so quattro sounds awsome. But m3 seems like a really fun driverz car😣
im looking for a car that is fast, under 30k, and can goes from 0-60 less than 4.5s. I’m thinking of the m3 or the rs5. if u have any other suggestions plz let me know🙏🏿
@bcoopernz Yo man I'm just sayin but the V8 in the E92 M3 is lighter than the outgoing V6 including the twin turbo in the 335i. It's aluminum construction. IMO there is no comparison between these two. I would take the Bimmer over an Audi any day of the week.
E92 M3. The last old skool (proper) M car. No comfort setting, no consideration for the environment, no turbos, no compromise. Just raw v8 sound and ultimate performance. The only thing stopping the driver from unleashing maximum power is their right foot!! Sad they don't make cars like that anymore 😭.
@ChewyNet1 This one, not so much. The torque vectoring rear differential means to computer is in full control and will always try to eliminate any under- or oversteer. Now, if you could reprogram it somehow...
I've driven both of these and I'm picking up my new RS5 in about 4 hours. Both cars are fantastic but unless your going to and from work on a racetrack, the RS5 is just flat incredible and as nice as the M3's engine is, the RS5 is in a whole different league.
which one you prefer comes down to taste. i, personally, prefer quattro on the road and like the a5's styling better. if i had access to a track i'd probably for the the M3. you cant go wrong w/ either one though
Not VW either, they are owned by Volkswagen group but they never claimed to be VW luxury line. VW Group owns Lambo, Buggati, Porsches, Seat, Ducati bikes. Only thing in common is they sometimes share some of the parts (Golf R equipped with Auto TT engine, R8 V10 using the lambo gallardo engine etc)
I was deciding between the BM or the Audi. In the end I chose Audi. I took delivery 2 weeks ago. No doubt I think the BM would have been the performance car, but I outgrew that somewhat. The Audi's performance is more than adequate and it has more gadgets you can shake a stick at. No regrets on my purchase whatsoever. I opted for the A5. I will probably mod her as I've done my previous cars.
Can anyone explain to me why the RS6 has 572hp and the RS5 only 444? I know the RS6 is heavier and a WAGON but still. Why not put that engine in all the S/RS cars?
We own 2 Audi's. We used to have one BMW and One Audi. The BMW's finish was no where near as good as the Audis. My wife could not drive the BMW in the Snow, as it would spin off. She hated the BMW in the Wet especially with our child on board. The gear stick in the BMW came out in my hand...enough said... Audi better quality and safer....Both great cars...differing philosophies.
On a track, I would prefer the BMW for some tail out fun without a quattro nanny interfering. But in the real world I would prefer the Audi, as in the real world, you're not always sliding around and burning your money in the form of rubber. And in all honesty, the Audi looks better, and sounds better, and I prefer the audi's interior too. But that's my opinion.
@koukicrisp actually it is not even faster on the track check fast test laps records of both cars and you'll see that the rs5 beats the M3 in more tracks
I was led to understand the Bugatti Veyron is purely a supercar VW design from within the VW HQ and was given to Bugatti to build and configure. The MLB(B8) chassis on the A/S/RS/4/5 etc is Exclusive to Audi only. The former B7 Chassis was shared with both the last and current Passat and now the Seat Exeo. The MQB chassis was built to be a 'variable' design, will share with TT and the New Golf next year. I was told its common for Audi/Bentley to test it first before the rest do.
The only real issue with the RS5 is that it's too heavy to be as "fun" as the M3 and C63. If Audi makes it lighter (which they seem to be doing with their newer cars)... it's top of the class because it's better in almost all the other categories.
Hahah funny all these guys fighting mover what manufacturer is better! Truth is, if you haven't driven both then you can't say one is better than the other... And even still, not everybody has the same driving style so some people will like one better than the other...
Audi, with it's comfort setting, has it spot on! My father-in-law's M3 (sedan) is such a jittery ride when on a long trip...it's actually kind of annoying sometimes as it's a little too sporty. But he's right, the M3 is fun. I'd imagine that anyone who bought either car (assuming they had no major bran loyalty one way or the other) would be entirely satisfied with either...but more satisfied if they owned both :)
I like the M3 better because the convertible version comes in hardtop as opposed to Audi convertible. So my pick is M3. Plus i like the exterior design of M3 better than Audi's. Besides i never even seen the RS5 in US markets. Is this only for Europe?
@lovebreakyou Audi is not VW. They do collaborate with various projects, but they both have seperate R&D, engineering and manufacturing. If you want to start talking about who offers better performance and looks, take a look at Lamborghini and Bentley....then look at who owns them :-)
no - that engine is no longer in use. the next RS6 will use a 4.0 V8. The Gallardo actually uses an Audi designed 5.2 V10 now... The old 5.0 was retired.
@ss770640 Nope. The RS5 is between the m3 and the m5. the m5s opponent is the rs6. I guess the rs5 is a bit closer to the m3, and since there is no bmw care that fits exactly in his class, the comparison is ok.
@Mowner3 I don't know what "cads" means lol. Just from what I see where I live, most of the people that drive the M3's are always late teen/early twenties guys. I don't understand how these "kids" can handle a track car like that because I have seen a couple of accidents involving one M3 and a bunch of 3 series BMW's (mostly women in my area drive those). A car like the M3/RS5/S5 should be driven by an experienced driver. Anyway, couldn't have said your comment any better…good comment!
@Orangevirus. I understand the concept perfectly. People who buy fashionable cars have purchased Audis since the first TT, and don't care that they are 4x4 or FWD, hence inferior. Ive always loved BMWs so am perhaps biased, even though I admit that Audis designers have the edge in terms of 'looks'. Audi has always played second fiddle to BMW in terms of performance and driver involvement/pleasure. The M3 is faster than the RS5 when driven by a real driver, not a layman, as in this video.
get the bmw xi (4 wheel drive) or put snow tires on it. i have a 5 series and it is the best car i own in the rain, and ive never had a problem in the snow
Like he said "anyone can go fast in this car." Thats the beauty of driving an Audi. You can feel like a professional driver when you're really not, while in the BMW an ordinary driver would be flipped over in a ditch. Safety, handling, ride, sport, luxury, style...Audi all day
Everyone talks new car prices... I am settling for an S5 with RS5 style rear bumper, LED tail lights, RS5 style side skirts and a couple of extras! will cost me about £25K, might get it fully loaded for 28K! looks and power on the cheap!
@lngbrd94 No sir, I'm afraid you're wrong about "Audi's are known for handling". The fact of the matter is that BMW's are known for handling. If YOU knew something about cars, you would know that every car magazine, tv show, etc, describes BMW's (most notably the 3 series) as "perfect chassis fluidity", "superlative handling", "poised and balanced". And the only reason that people left BMW for Audi is because most people who buy German cars are for the luxury, not the sport.
You sir would be correct. And yes I did notice my rather crappy mistake and have since then been enlightened that it's the VW group that owns Audi and not BMW. And so I hope that this reply satisfies your need to point out others mistakes.
@@josefinkjellsson7051 As I commented earlier, the S5 has untapped potential. With a few mild performance upgrades (intake, exhaust, suspension (coilovers, sway bars), brakes (braided brake lines, pads), tyres + a tune), the RS5 would compete head to head with the M3 on the track. And it looks and sounds better imho, and has better fit and finish in than the E92M3. And the higher depreciation of the Audi means it is now a sleeper and performance bargain.
@@melbguy1 and do the same "few mild performance upgrades" to the BMW and it would leave the RS5 on track and on street even more, so your point is invalid comparing platform to platform or modified to OEM. Just buy a bmw will ya, and stop pretending that audi and VAG-group can produce anything that is worth having in your garage :)
@@josefinkjellsson7051 Yeah i'd concede the Audi is likely to cost more in the long run on servicing. That said, the E92 M3 will always play second fiddle to the E46 M3 as most BMW purists want an inline 6.
Well they do use the word "Versus" which means "Against - contra - for - to - or opposite" so in other words the title reads "Audi RS5 Against BMW M3 review". So yes, I do believe people came to see which car won, I know I did, which means other people probably did as well. To me; it just seems you're kind of butt hurt that the reviewer chose the Bimmer over the Audi.
@SwiftHDX Ever heard of taking your car to the track? That's what these cars were meant for, and drifting in the corners in an M3 is more fun than an RS5.
Which of the two cars puts a smile on the driver? That for me is a great car and unfortunately I didn't see the driver in the Audi smiling as much as he was when he was in the M3. Audi fans wether you like it or not, wether admit it or not M3 is the best end of story.
really the M3 is only slightly faster around certain tracks (though not all)... and that has less to do with a "real driver" - but more to do with the weight of the vehicles.
Not true, but classic mistake. Audi, Seat, Skoda, VW and Bentley are all going to share platforms with coming models, starting with the new A3. Porsche, Lambo and Bugatti have their own platforms to build their own respective cars. Only the Porsche SUV's share VAG platforms, but that's part of Piëch's market strategy to start milking the porsche brand aswell.
What I like about Audis in general is that almost all of them have a dual personality, with the RS5 being the most pronounced. Keep them below 4000 RPM (or in "comfort" mode) and it's a car you can let your partner drive without any special training to go shopping or generally cart around in style, However, go above 4000 RPM and the nature of the beast changes dramatically, especially if you also open the exhaust valves. In that mode, it goes from 0 to illegal in under 5 seconds without any fuss or wheel spin, but even then you remain in control. However, going faster doesn't mean getting somewhere quicker: at 8000 RPM, that nice V8 uses SEVEN litres of fuel per minute (translated: a whole tank goes in under 15 minutes) so you'll spend a lot of time standing still and refuelling :).
As Mat says, if you've got free tires and unlimited track time, that M3 is it. If you expect to drive on roads, where fishtailing can end your day, it may be slightly less fun.
with esp activated you dont get in such a situation by accident.
Thats matt from carwow!!1
Yesyeysyeysyeysyeysyeysyeysysyeysysyeyeyeyyesyeyyyeyeyys
Old school Mr Watson
Aye Matt from Carwow came a long way!
13 years later and im trying to pick between a 335i and a S5
M3 is an amazing car so is rs5 really tough choice haha just know ur doing well if ur choosing between an rs5 an m3
gamertanafc rs5 top m3 crap
Only an idiot won't reply with that comment, I take it you have neither car you TOBY
M3 beats the rs5 easily
@@jebusglatze1285 Not in fit and finish. And the RS5 looks and sounds better imho. I'd add that the RS5 has untapped potential. With a few mild performance upgrades (intake, exhaust, suspension (coilovers, sway bars), brakes (braided brake lines, pads), tyres + tune), the RS5 would compete head to head with the M3 on the track.
Lets be honest. How often do you drift to fuck up your tires?
MATT WATSON FROM CARWOW
throwback to the time when the cars had mighty v8 s and matt watson reviewed them
Love both but having the thought of rod bearing failure on my mind is a deal breaker
What did I just stumble upon?! Young matt???
whats Matt doing on AutoExpress? still a good review
I found an RS5 for £14,500 you know imma cop that ride
@SwiftHDX last sentence is spot on.they are BOTH must have in your garage
And probably the same thing happens with Series 1M and RS3, right?
Well well well, if it isnt Matt from Carwow, on AE.. with a tracksuit.
The RS5 is incredible. I am just waiting for this beast to come to the US.
I still love the RS5, but I do respect the M3 in certain aspects
Same bra
Ha boobs
@craig sawyer did u pick one. I want a 2011-13 e92 comp. Or b8.5 rs5.. Im moving to tahoe area so quattro sounds awsome. But m3 seems like a really fun driverz car😣
Matt Watson Balkan edition
How does the m3/m4 compare to the cayman gts? I am so conflicted.
im looking for a car that is fast, under 30k, and can goes from 0-60 less than 4.5s. I’m thinking of the m3 or the rs5.
if u have any other suggestions plz let me know🙏🏿
@caronliner24 TTRS has a inline 5 turbo, the RS5 has a 4.2 V8
@bcoopernz Yo man I'm just sayin but the V8 in the E92 M3 is lighter than the outgoing V6 including the twin turbo in the 335i. It's aluminum construction.
IMO there is no comparison between these two. I would take the Bimmer over an Audi any day of the week.
Matt is the best reviewer on RUclips!
E92 M3. The last old skool (proper) M car. No comfort setting, no consideration for the environment, no turbos, no compromise. Just raw v8 sound and ultimate performance. The only thing stopping the driver from unleashing maximum power is their right foot!!
Sad they don't make cars like that anymore 😭.
@ChewyNet1 This one, not so much. The torque vectoring rear differential means to computer is in full control and will always try to eliminate any under- or oversteer. Now, if you could reprogram it somehow...
The only car review I love -> review from this guy (I forgot his name (a) )
HD, Good review, good guy -> Auto Express or Car buyer :)
Don't know which colour this looks best in, Daytona Grey or ibis white , or even phantom black
I've driven both of these and I'm picking up my new RS5 in about 4 hours. Both cars are fantastic but unless your going to and from work on a racetrack, the RS5 is just flat incredible and as nice as the M3's engine is, the RS5 is in a whole different league.
which one you prefer comes down to taste. i, personally, prefer quattro on the road and like the a5's styling better. if i had access to a track i'd probably for the the M3. you cant go wrong w/ either one though
@Warrantti Have you driven either?
I want both.....
But isn't the 3-series coupe already the answer to the A5? Why would they make a 4-series?
@Voogan1 He said the RS5 is about the go, not Audi in general.
@SwiftHDX i'd rather have an engine roar when your going 65 like a ferrari or accelerating than having a prius not making any noise going 120.
Not VW either, they are owned by Volkswagen group but they never claimed to be VW luxury line. VW Group owns Lambo, Buggati, Porsches, Seat, Ducati bikes. Only thing in common is they sometimes share some of the parts (Golf R equipped with Auto TT engine, R8 V10 using the lambo gallardo engine etc)
I was deciding between the BM or the Audi. In the end I chose Audi. I took delivery 2 weeks ago. No doubt I think the BM would have been the performance car, but I outgrew that somewhat. The Audi's performance is more than adequate and it has more gadgets you can shake a stick at. No regrets on my purchase whatsoever. I opted for the A5. I will probably mod her as I've done my previous cars.
Can anyone explain to me why the RS6 has 572hp and the RS5 only 444? I know the RS6 is heavier and a WAGON but still. Why not put that engine in all the S/RS cars?
We own 2 Audi's. We used to have one BMW and One Audi. The BMW's finish was no where near as good as the Audis. My wife could not drive the BMW in the Snow, as it would spin off. She hated the BMW in the Wet especially with our child on board. The gear stick in the BMW came out in my hand...enough said... Audi better quality and safer....Both great cars...differing philosophies.
You mean that Audi is part of the Volkswagen group?
On a track, I would prefer the BMW for some tail out fun without a quattro nanny interfering.
But in the real world I would prefer the Audi, as in the real world, you're not always sliding around and burning your money in the form of rubber.
And in all honesty, the Audi looks better, and sounds better, and I prefer the audi's interior too.
But that's my opinion.
What year?
Really!? When i went and looked at them the s5 was 2000 more then the s5 in Australia.
so your M3 isn't stock? an RS5 could be modded too...
did he dry steer at the very end
@koukicrisp actually it is not even faster on the track check fast test laps records of both cars and you'll see that the rs5 beats the M3 in more tracks
@sitafreak420 and why is that? the car has servo steering it's not like 20years old
Mat has come so far.
@Cassius1706 I admire the ///M performance but they can´t do the same Performance of Audi.
I was led to understand the Bugatti Veyron is purely a supercar VW design from within the VW HQ and was given to Bugatti to build and configure. The MLB(B8) chassis on the A/S/RS/4/5 etc is Exclusive to Audi only. The former B7 Chassis was shared with both the last and current Passat and now the Seat Exeo. The MQB chassis was built to be a 'variable' design, will share with TT and the New Golf next year. I was told its common for Audi/Bentley to test it first before the rest do.
The only real issue with the RS5 is that it's too heavy to be as "fun" as the M3 and C63. If Audi makes it lighter (which they seem to be doing with their newer cars)... it's top of the class because it's better in almost all the other categories.
@Cassius1706 the audi RS5 starts at 70,000$ US and the M3 starts at 60,000...
Hahah funny all these guys fighting mover what manufacturer is better! Truth is, if you haven't driven both then you can't say one is better than the other... And even still, not everybody has the same driving style so some people will like one better than the other...
Audi, with it's comfort setting, has it spot on! My father-in-law's M3 (sedan) is such a jittery ride when on a long trip...it's actually kind of annoying sometimes as it's a little too sporty.
But he's right, the M3 is fun.
I'd imagine that anyone who bought either car (assuming they had no major bran loyalty one way or the other) would be entirely satisfied with either...but more satisfied if they owned both :)
That's wrong actually. It's 328 against the A5; 335i against the S5; M3 against the RS5, and soon, it will be the i8 against the R8. I can't wait!
even my nanny could bring an impressive lap time which she is dead for past 10 years ...lols love you my matt
doesnt the rs5 compete with the bmw m6? i thought it was a midsize car liike the m6
I like the M3 better because the convertible version comes in hardtop as opposed to Audi convertible. So my pick is M3. Plus i like the exterior design of M3 better than Audi's. Besides i never even seen the RS5 in US markets. Is this only for Europe?
@lovebreakyou Audi is not VW. They do collaborate with various projects, but they both have seperate R&D, engineering and manufacturing.
If you want to start talking about who offers better performance and looks, take a look at Lamborghini and Bentley....then look at who owns them :-)
no - that engine is no longer in use. the next RS6 will use a 4.0 V8. The Gallardo actually uses an Audi designed 5.2 V10 now... The old 5.0 was retired.
@ss770640 Nope. The RS5 is between the m3 and the m5. the m5s opponent is the rs6. I guess the rs5 is a bit closer to the m3, and since there is no bmw care that fits exactly in his class, the comparison is ok.
you should check that info
@adnanalagic my exact opinion too. No disrespect to BMW but I am not always in the mood to drift and rev my car and all that sporty stuff.
@Mowner3 I don't know what "cads" means lol. Just from what I see where I live, most of the people that drive the M3's are always late teen/early twenties guys. I don't understand how these "kids" can handle a track car like that because I have seen a couple of accidents involving one M3 and a bunch of 3 series BMW's (mostly women in my area drive those). A car like the M3/RS5/S5 should be driven by an experienced driver. Anyway, couldn't have said your comment any better…good comment!
I agree. I love BMW, Audi and Merc equally! And I wouldn't buy another car than tohse three.
It also has more equipment as standard, 30 hp more, 4WD, better gearbox. It shouldn't be a surprise that the Audi is more expensive!
M3. Also, the highway speed is 70mph. That means the spoiler will go down and up endlessly if you cant keep a steady speed.
it would be siick to have both
the///M3's power-slide looks brilliant BUT I dont want to buy new tires in every week
Did any seen Matt's shoes !!!!👞😆😆
@Orangevirus. I understand the concept perfectly. People who buy fashionable cars have purchased Audis since the first TT, and don't care that they are 4x4 or FWD, hence inferior. Ive always loved BMWs so am perhaps biased, even though I admit that Audis designers have the edge in terms of 'looks'. Audi has always played second fiddle to BMW in terms of performance and driver involvement/pleasure. The M3 is faster than the RS5 when driven by a real driver, not a layman, as in this video.
@daibadrumu I'm refering to the M3 vs. RS5 not Audi vs. BMW
@MrTorrHumor RS4 doesn't exist anymore, brightspark. The RS5 took over the old RS4. These 2 are the same class...
@olaguma yea, but GT-R costs double
get the bmw xi (4 wheel drive) or put snow tires on it. i have a 5 series and it is the best car i own in the rain, and ive never had a problem in the snow
Like he said "anyone can go fast in this car." Thats the beauty of driving an Audi. You can feel like a professional driver when you're really not, while in the BMW an ordinary driver would be flipped over in a ditch. Safety, handling, ride, sport, luxury, style...Audi all day
Everyone talks new car prices... I am settling for an S5 with RS5 style rear bumper, LED tail lights, RS5 style side skirts and a couple of extras! will cost me about £25K, might get it fully loaded for 28K! looks and power on the cheap!
NO! Audi is a part of Volkswagen group. BMW is independent. BMW Group owns other luxury brands like Rolls Royce. (Volkswagen owns Bentley)
@lngbrd94 No sir, I'm afraid you're wrong about "Audi's are known for handling". The fact of the matter is that BMW's are known for handling. If YOU knew something about cars, you would know that every car magazine, tv show, etc, describes BMW's (most notably the 3 series) as "perfect chassis fluidity", "superlative handling", "poised and balanced". And the only reason that people left BMW for Audi is because most people who buy German cars are for the luxury, not the sport.
RS2?
obviously you didn't watch the entire video, when i did, i was almost entirely sure the M3 is the better car
You sir would be correct. And yes I did notice my rather crappy mistake and have since then been enlightened that it's the VW group that owns Audi and not BMW. And so I hope that this reply satisfies your need to point out others mistakes.
I'm an AUDI lover but the BMW just amazing
Got that exact RS5 she's a beauty
And low on power and handles like Titanic..yes we know..
@@josefinkjellsson7051 As I commented earlier, the S5 has untapped potential. With a few mild performance upgrades (intake, exhaust, suspension (coilovers, sway bars), brakes (braided brake lines, pads), tyres + a tune), the RS5 would compete head to head with the M3 on the track. And it looks and sounds better imho, and has better fit and finish in than the E92M3. And the higher depreciation of the Audi means it is now a sleeper and performance bargain.
@@melbguy1 and do the same "few mild performance upgrades" to the BMW and it would leave the RS5 on track and on street even more, so your point is invalid comparing platform to platform or modified to OEM. Just buy a bmw will ya, and stop pretending that audi and VAG-group can produce anything that is worth having in your garage :)
@@josefinkjellsson7051 Yeah i'd concede the Audi is likely to cost more in the long run on servicing. That said, the E92 M3 will always play second fiddle to the E46 M3 as most BMW purists want an inline 6.
sry typo's.its "best" to the one who owns it.and if u have a "list" of things.
Well they do use the word "Versus" which means "Against - contra - for - to - or opposite" so in other words the title reads "Audi RS5 Against BMW M3 review".
So yes, I do believe people came to see which car won, I know I did, which means other people probably did as well.
To me; it just seems you're kind of butt hurt that the reviewer chose the Bimmer over the Audi.
One MAJOR advantage to the Audi: Seats.
BMW is a BMW!! not a glorified VW:)
+GTR R35 NISMO TOP ! Ugly ? U fucking blind or just stupid ?
How, much is that Nismo?
aint nothing wrong with vee dubb peter pan
@SwiftHDX Ever heard of taking your car to the track? That's what these cars were meant for, and drifting in the corners in an M3 is more fun than an RS5.
The RS5 is one sweet ride...
I like the M3 front visibility and Audi interiors.
Which of the two cars puts a smile on the driver? That for me is a great car and unfortunately I didn't see the driver in the Audi smiling as much as he was when he was in the M3. Audi fans wether you like it or not, wether admit it or not M3 is the best end of story.
No, the S5 or S4 competes with the 335i.
really the M3 is only slightly faster around certain tracks (though not all)... and that has less to do with a "real driver" - but more to do with the weight of the vehicles.
You pay 5000 more for the Audi but you get 30 hp more, awd and better looks, REAL sport seats as standard. What more can you ask for???
I want both please
Not true, but classic mistake. Audi, Seat, Skoda, VW and Bentley are all going to share platforms with coming models, starting with the new A3. Porsche, Lambo and Bugatti have their own platforms to build their own respective cars. Only the Porsche SUV's share VAG platforms, but that's part of Piëch's market strategy to start milking the porsche brand aswell.
I agree with you. I am a BMW fan and user, but at the end of the day, it is a matter of choice and like.
audi should make more rwd cars