Yeah, shows just how hard it is to leave Earth and how much harder doing so on a super earth would be PS, it was probably filled near max payload weight for a leo mission and still got to earth!
well if it had some bombs it could do something since it's name is Enterprise and anything named Enterprise and is American always does something stupidly effective
for those who didn't understand, the space shuttle in the video is named "enterprise" and wes its from star trek but this shutle never flew because it was the first created by nasa
@@anekdoche7055 for those who want a better explanation, the orbiter vehicle used in the video named enterprise was used as a test article to make sure the shuttle was able to glide to landing and develop the procedures needed for landing. It never flew to orbit because mainly changes in design. After it was constructed, it was supposed to be modified to be flown to space, but major design changes, which were easily modified on the work-in-progress OV-102 (columbia), were unable to easily be done on OV-101 (enterprise), since it was further along in construction. Budgetary restraints meant that these modifications were not made. Fun fact: it was initially going to be called the Constitution, but Star Trek fans held a petition to change it to the Enterprise after the ship in Star Trek. After the challenger disaster, Enterprise was offered as a solution to replace the lost orbiter, but it was cheaper to use the spare parts for shuttle, so she never got to fly.
Quick update since I left during the premier: The shuttle mod is from SOCK & ReDirect. The Crawler mod is the ancient one I found on a google drive on the RO server, not sure where it originates.
@@TDChannelKSP Thanks, I thought it looked like Benjee’s orbiter (especially when I compared it to DECQ’s mod), but I forgot that there were RO configs built into RO.
Wow. I've never seen such attention to detail. This is next level stuff, subbed right away. Cant imagine the amount of work and time that went into this. Seriously impressed. Jeb actually stalling the shuttle onto the runway was a nice humouristic bonus. :D
You've got to feel good for the crawler. 60 years later and it finally got its own ticket to space. (And it deserves astronaut wings more than Bill Nelson ever did. )
@@AgzamovAkhror KSP is always going to perform poorly due to its limitations and single-core bottleneck, but the 11400 is certainly a lot better than my old 4460! Besides, that's what speeding up the video in post is for :P
I love how the landed launch platform casually has RCS ports still attached to it that look like they are literally just additional shuttle main engines strapped on and used as RCS
So cool how in the smaller atmosphere of Mars the SRB plumes over expand so much. I don't care how expensive it was, the shuttle was amazing and I miss it (even if it never did go to Mars atop 57 Sea Dragon engines)
In theory, with considerable modifications: - The RS-25s need to be upgraded to be able to light without GSE and light multiple times - definitely possible, just expensive. - Somehow you have to keep the hydrolox chilled to minimize boiloff over the trip home - I don't believe hydrolox has ever been stored for that long IRL, but technically possible. - Also need a power source other than the fuel cells, like solar. - Then there's the question of re-entry - not sure if Shuttle IRL could handle multiple aerobraking passes or not - maybe it could. If the cargo bay was empty, you could probably slow down more. Other than that though, sure!
@@TDChannelKSP Since the shuttles TPS wasn’t ablative, in theory it could’ve done multiple back to back entries/aero brake passes. Though this would require probably all of the tps to stay intact which the shuttle has a muddy history of, not counting the fact that the LV had sea dragon engines in the double digits.
@@Spaceguy-nineteensixtynine well, the TPS not staying intact was usually related to ice falling off the external tank on launch. Since water vapor basically doesn’t exist on mars, that’s not much of an issue
Not sure how the crawler would stand up to a thumping landing on uneven terrain, especially when fully laden. It strikes me as a vehicle not really intended to ever be airborne ;)
@@worldcomicsreview354 Yeah I think a more... *precise* skycrane landing would be ideal. M-1Us lacking throttling and only 2 ignitions made it tricky - was thinking about replacing with raptors, until... amusingly enough, it worked. So I went with this take.
I've seen two of the remaining orbiters in real life, Atlantis and Endeavour. They're currently working on a new building at the California Science Center, where Endeavour is located, to create a new exhibit for Endeavour. The ET-94 is also on exhibit at the California Science Center, and is the only remaining external tank that was flight certified. A specific class of lightweight tanks were designed for science missions, which were not planned to continue after the Columbia disaster. ET-94 was instead tested by NASA to help determine the cause of the disaster, and was eventually given to the science center in 2016. For the new Endeavour exhibit, two shuttle "srbs," which are really just big tubes of aluminum, are currently at the Mojave Air and Space Port. They are owned by the science center, and will be stacked with Endeavour, along with ET-94 to create a full shuttle stack. I think that'll really put it into perspective. You can also see something similar at Kennedy Space Center's visitor center, where a shuttle external tank and two SRBs area stacked outside the Atlantis exhibit, without a shuttle attached.
I’ve seen an orbiter and built one in Minecraft! Can confirm that despite being pretty horrendous in many regards, the shuttle was a majestic piece of engineering.
I am honestly more impressed about the controlled landing on Woomera than on the whole trip to Mars. I'll never understand how some people have that much control over landing position, specially here when deorbiting was made by aerobreaking with little to no fuel for corrections. How the heck did you manage landing on an spaceport runway?
I made a tiny SSTO with one engine, about the size of a cruise missile and Jeb riding it all the way to orbit on a seat strapped to the side of the rocket. I got everything right - except the landing on the runway. I have never done that, even once. ruclips.net/video/a60v-gjNsKM/видео.html
You just break the game "push it to the limit" not only applies to your performance, but also to the game engine, I dont think unity is going to handle it really well Edit: The SOCK Shuttle flies like a dream!
Don't forget the water that keeps the Shuttle from blowing up in the sound suppression system. And the Shuttle can only be in space about 2 weeks before it runs of cabin air so you would some how have to cut 12 months or so off the trip to mars and back. Coming back from Mars, you would need a lot more fuel to slow down. Shuttles heat shield is not moon or Mars rated.
Just a few points: 1: On the sound suppression system - valid point, although this makes me wonder: With the much thinner atmosphere for the sound waves to go through, would it only need a small system? Not like the pad has to be re-used - the shuttle does have to survive though. 2: That would be true, which is why in the cargo bay there's an entirely new habitat and life support system, weighing some 80 tons or so. 3: That's... exactly what I do in the video - the entry speed is well below lunar speeds, it's more like almost GTO speeds, plus multiple passes to limit the load - don't know if real shuttle could take even that, but it's better than direct.
Technically the crawler already has DC electric motors. Just hecking big ones. They use Alco locomotive motor-generator units to provide the required large quantities of electricity to them, but there's nothing saying you couldn't (with more money spent) replace those with (large) batteries and (equally large) solar panels to allow the thing to work mostly independently on Mars. And bonus points, I don't think the terrain of Mars would tear those massive crawler tracks up too badly, unlike what happened to Curiosity's wheels.
can you explain something? how do you get fps with this thing. i have a normal rp1 + principia save and when i try to build a proton rocket my game just goes "poof" and crashes
How much RAM do you have? A proton shouldn't crash your game - not even this rocket crashed my game (only apollo^2 and Christmas tree have), could be a sign of a weird install. I also don't use principia just due to concerns of performance impact in late-game rp1.
I do really love the idea of launch vehicles launched from other worlds because of lower gravity and atmospheric drag. Like- Starship is planned to land on Mars and the Moon, but what if you built or landed a Super Heavy on one of those? Feels then you could get a much bigger payload or delta v. Or, like in this case, a Space Shuttle launching from Mars being enough to get back to Earth.
The density of the atmosphere on mars is 90 times lower than on the cape's runway, the landing speed on Mars would be about 6 times higher. How long would the runway have to be for a safe landing?
This speaks to me on another level. Also, at this point, you should have just stuffed a pile of boosters on the other side of the planet and just taken the whole planet! :P
And the funniest thing to me about this is that if those are hydrolox engines, this is technically eco-friendly! The only waste product of the burning fuel is water XD
NASA:(transport space shuttle into its launch site slowly, and gently as podsible) TD Space: *LETS PUT THE F@CKING SPACE SHUTTLE ON MARS* For Recovering misson
Bro just caused a mass-extinction event But I’m actually surprised that his pc can hold like 70 engines at once while mine can barely run with 1/4 graphics
![[Limbus Company - Teaser] Season5 - Oblivion](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8anKuEeZLeI/mqdefault.jpg)
It's really kinda crazy that the same setup that went from Mars' surface all the way back to Earth is the same that only just about gets into LEO
Really puts a perspective to how difficult it actually is to go to LEO IRL
@@itmeducky The saying "Once you're in orbit you're halfway to anywhere" exists for a reason
Yeah, shows just how hard it is to leave Earth and how much harder doing so on a super earth would be
PS, it was probably filled near max payload weight for a leo mission and still got to earth!
just do alt f12 thats it you can leave sagittarius a if you want its the dev console
@@nastykerb34 kinda takes away the fun, thats why td did the actual mission
I guess its fitting that the Shuttle that never flew would be the one to land on Mars
well if it had some bombs it could do something since it's name is Enterprise and anything named Enterprise and is American always does something stupidly effective
Firstly: orbiter
Secondly: it did technically fly, just never in space and on a shuttle mission
for those who didn't understand, the space shuttle in the video is named "enterprise" and wes its from star trek
but this shutle never flew because it was the first created by nasa
@@anekdoche7055 for those who want a better explanation, the orbiter vehicle used in the video named enterprise was used as a test article to make sure the shuttle was able to glide to landing and develop the procedures needed for landing. It never flew to orbit because mainly changes in design. After it was constructed, it was supposed to be modified to be flown to space, but major design changes, which were easily modified on the work-in-progress OV-102 (columbia), were unable to easily be done on OV-101 (enterprise), since it was further along in construction. Budgetary restraints meant that these modifications were not made. Fun fact: it was initially going to be called the Constitution, but Star Trek fans held a petition to change it to the Enterprise after the ship in Star Trek.
After the challenger disaster, Enterprise was offered as a solution to replace the lost orbiter, but it was cheaper to use the spare parts for shuttle, so she never got to fly.
i read your name as zach bowels
Although the sideways stage was intended as a kraken-mitigating scheme...it kinda fits the fact that the Shuttle was an asymetrical vehicle.
"kinda" assymetrical, since it depends which side you are looking from.
It even has a launch abort system
Quick update since I left during the premier: The shuttle mod is from SOCK & ReDirect. The Crawler mod is the ancient one I found on a google drive on the RO server, not sure where it originates.
@@TDChannelKSP Thanks, I thought it looked like Benjee’s orbiter (especially when I compared it to DECQ’s mod), but I forgot that there were RO configs built into RO.
Now when we finally got Space Shuttles into RSS/RO, this is not the use I had intended for them haha
Great video!
Wow. I've never seen such attention to detail. This is next level stuff, subbed right away. Cant imagine the amount of work and time that went into this. Seriously impressed. Jeb actually stalling the shuttle onto the runway was a nice humouristic bonus. :D
hilariously, all that detail is required to make th mission work in RSSRO. You should play it! It's !!fun!!
Using something as large as the Enterprise to launch the Enterprise to the Mars. U know which Enterprise I'm talking about. XD
Which letter
@@mariasirona1622 d
Great to see the Enterprise! Far better than ending up as a space station.
More than enough to wipe KSC away LOLl
You've got to feel good for the crawler. 60 years later and it finally got its own ticket to space.
(And it deserves astronaut wings more than Bill Nelson ever did. )
Now he just needs to take the launch tower on the next one…
Bruhhh... HOW DID YOU DO THIS?!?!?!
This is absolutely insane! In a good way!
NASA with the militarys budget be like:
Tho for realzies this is SICK!
love the overexpanded SRBs
LOL ! ! ! That Launch Would Have Destroyed Just About All The NASA Facilities And Infrastructure At The Kennedy Space Centre ! ! ! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
JEB, STOP LANDING LIKE RYANAIR!
Forget the SLS, NASA needs to see this NOW!
Wow, that’s mad. What’s your computer specs?
i5-11400f, 32GB DDR4-3200, RTX 3060ti
Compared to other missions I've done, thanks to part count optimization this one wasn't too bad to run!
@@TDChannelKSP does your cpu perform enough? I’ve heard that on i9 ksp doesn’t take full capability.
@@AgzamovAkhror KSP is always going to perform poorly due to its limitations and single-core bottleneck, but the 11400 is certainly a lot better than my old 4460!
Besides, that's what speeding up the video in post is for :P
bro got the vector rocket
"hey Russia look at this new toy I got"
4:51 GIMBAL DANCING 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
how yo mamma became an astronaut
Holy moly, outstanding!
WTF! I approve!
This would be more impressive if the parts actually connected in any way..
The Crawler is just Perseverance 2.0 now :D
Thes are awsome
Amazing wish I had these skills lol
Whats this rockets carbon footprint!
Florida
(its gone)
Where are those giant heat shields from?
same question here
ROheatshields.
Can we just appreciate how the _RCS_ thrusters on the Crawler are bigger than the RS-25's?
Wonder what fuel they used
@@Electric_Bagpipes Tears of rational people
look about the same as the AJ10s, actually
69 like
@@Spaceguy-nineteensixtynine along with the blood of the engineers that worked on this thing as oxidizer
I'm surprised the launch pad didn't instantly disintegrate.
P.S.: Best Mars rover ever.
indeed
It's quite surreal seeing the full space shuttle stack take off from Mars
Something FAMK would do
@@LSF17 Even for that show, this is much too crazy
With the MLP too
Only in KSP can "All 57 Sea Dragon engines nominal" be spoken and it is kind of expected.
I love how the landed launch platform casually has RCS ports still attached to it that look like they are literally just additional shuttle main engines strapped on and used as RCS
Man, I can’t even imagine how you even came to make this, every single bit of it is so intricate and downright perfect. Really good stuff man!
So cool how in the smaller atmosphere of Mars the SRB plumes over expand so much. I don't care how expensive it was, the shuttle was amazing and I miss it (even if it never did go to Mars atop 57 Sea Dragon engines)
57 Sea dragon engines... this thing in real world would shake the earth
Bake*
@@threestrikesmarxman9095Break*
222222222222222222222222222222222222²
@@threestrikesmarxman9095
'You see that launchsite?'
'Yes sir.'
'I don't want to.'
'YES SIR!'
for real tho this is really impressive.
watch as I make this launchpad...dissapere
Hypothetically, in real life could you take a fully assembled Space Shuttle from the surface of Mars back to Earth?
In theory, with considerable modifications:
- The RS-25s need to be upgraded to be able to light without GSE and light multiple times - definitely possible, just expensive.
- Somehow you have to keep the hydrolox chilled to minimize boiloff over the trip home - I don't believe hydrolox has ever been stored for that long IRL, but technically possible.
- Also need a power source other than the fuel cells, like solar.
- Then there's the question of re-entry - not sure if Shuttle IRL could handle multiple aerobraking passes or not - maybe it could. If the cargo bay was empty, you could probably slow down more.
Other than that though, sure!
@@TDChannelKSP Since the shuttles TPS wasn’t ablative, in theory it could’ve done multiple back to back entries/aero brake passes. Though this would require probably all of the tps to stay intact which the shuttle has a muddy history of, not counting the fact that the LV had sea dragon engines in the double digits.
@@Spaceguy-nineteensixtynine well, the TPS not staying intact was usually related to ice falling off the external tank on launch. Since water vapor basically doesn’t exist on mars, that’s not much of an issue
Not sure how the crawler would stand up to a thumping landing on uneven terrain, especially when fully laden. It strikes me as a vehicle not really intended to ever be airborne ;)
@@worldcomicsreview354 Yeah I think a more... *precise* skycrane landing would be ideal. M-1Us lacking throttling and only 2 ignitions made it tricky - was thinking about replacing with raptors, until... amusingly enough, it worked. So I went with this take.
This is why "it works in kerbal space program" is such a meme lol. the dedication to pull this off tho is impressive
I am witnessing KSP’s Baroque Period unfold before my eyes.
I built a 1:1 scale model of the space shuttle in Minecraft and my god does it put this in perspective, thanks for the vid. :-)
I've seen two of the remaining orbiters in real life, Atlantis and Endeavour. They're currently working on a new building at the California Science Center, where Endeavour is located, to create a new exhibit for Endeavour. The ET-94 is also on exhibit at the California Science Center, and is the only remaining external tank that was flight certified. A specific class of lightweight tanks were designed for science missions, which were not planned to continue after the Columbia disaster. ET-94 was instead tested by NASA to help determine the cause of the disaster, and was eventually given to the science center in 2016.
For the new Endeavour exhibit, two shuttle "srbs," which are really just big tubes of aluminum, are currently at the Mojave Air and Space Port. They are owned by the science center, and will be stacked with Endeavour, along with ET-94 to create a full shuttle stack. I think that'll really put it into perspective. You can also see something similar at Kennedy Space Center's visitor center, where a shuttle external tank and two SRBs area stacked outside the Atlantis exhibit, without a shuttle attached.
I’ve seen an orbiter and built one in Minecraft! Can confirm that despite being pretty horrendous in many regards, the shuttle was a majestic piece of engineering.
I am honestly more impressed about the controlled landing on Woomera than on the whole trip to Mars. I'll never understand how some people have that much control over landing position, specially here when deorbiting was made by aerobreaking with little to no fuel for corrections. How the heck did you manage landing on an spaceport runway?
I made a tiny SSTO with one engine, about the size of a cruise missile and Jeb riding it all the way to orbit on a seat strapped to the side of the rocket. I got everything right - except the landing on the runway. I have never done that, even once.
ruclips.net/video/a60v-gjNsKM/видео.html
Lift vectoring.
It's the closest landing site. What would have been more impressive is a landing at Cape Canaveral, but maybe I'm being greedy.
"Ah, this very a good use of our budget!" -KSC
You just break the game "push it to the limit" not only applies to your performance, but also to the game engine, I dont think unity is going to handle it really well
Edit: The SOCK Shuttle flies like a dream!
i think its funny how the shuttle that he decided to use was Enterprise which has the never flown before haha
Don't forget the water that keeps the Shuttle from blowing up in the sound suppression system. And the Shuttle can only be in space about 2 weeks before it runs of cabin air so you would some how have to cut 12 months or so off the trip to mars and back. Coming back from Mars, you would need a lot more fuel to slow down. Shuttles heat shield is not moon or Mars rated.
Just a few points:
1: On the sound suppression system - valid point, although this makes me wonder: With the much thinner atmosphere for the sound waves to go through, would it only need a small system? Not like the pad has to be re-used - the shuttle does have to survive though.
2: That would be true, which is why in the cargo bay there's an entirely new habitat and life support system, weighing some 80 tons or so.
3: That's... exactly what I do in the video - the entry speed is well below lunar speeds, it's more like almost GTO speeds, plus multiple passes to limit the load - don't know if real shuttle could take even that, but it's better than direct.
Please... please be reasonable this time.
impossible
Lemme stop you right there
Calvin is like that one kid on the Magic School Bus who always hopes for a normal field trip
Rocket thicc so sorry cal
@@Gameknigh slso thats arnold
What an amazing video! You certainly got a subscriber here. As a shuttle fan, seeing the shots of the shuttle above Mars almost makes me cry
same my brother
In another timeline, maybe shuttles did make it to Mars...
@@theendlessvoid7124 Why did you have to say this ?
12:49 *2003 flashbacks intensifies*
0:41 I felt a great disturbance in the Korce, as if millions of taxpayer dollars suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
14:45 I think after all that time in low gravity, that landing means a crushed vertebrae or slipped disc 😭
Plot twist: challenger disaster 2 happens on mars and they all die
You made the Space Shuttle Enterprise's dream of going to space come true.
That's the kind of thrust that will slow kerbins orbit down enough to sink it in the sun...
No Kerbin here, just Earth ;)
Kerbin is locked to a rail, so no amount of thrust can deorbit it
Even if it wasn’t locked, Kerbin still wouldn’t care due to it’s ludicrous mass
I guess you changed the crawler's diesel engines for electric motors. Diesel engines wouldn't be so happy with Mars' atmosphere.
Technically the crawler already has DC electric motors. Just hecking big ones. They use Alco locomotive motor-generator units to provide the required large quantities of electricity to them, but there's nothing saying you couldn't (with more money spent) replace those with (large) batteries and (equally large) solar panels to allow the thing to work mostly independently on Mars.
And bonus points, I don't think the terrain of Mars would tear those massive crawler tracks up too badly, unlike what happened to Curiosity's wheels.
can you explain something? how do you get fps with this thing. i have a normal rp1 + principia save and when i try to build a proton rocket my game just goes "poof" and crashes
How much RAM do you have? A proton shouldn't crash your game - not even this rocket crashed my game (only apollo^2 and Christmas tree have), could be a sign of a weird install.
I also don't use principia just due to concerns of performance impact in late-game rp1.
@@TDChannelKSP i have 24G of ram . i don't know about the weird install i installed everything with ckan.
@@troynid8400 Hmm. Should be fine then.
Try asking the RO discord in #ro-support for assistance. discord.com/invite/3xMtyBg
This is more practical than the SLS and would likely cost less.
Lmaoooo sure buddy
Can you do the nearly exact same but with the sls (space launch system)?
Here I thought nothing would impress me after seing Stratzen and Bradley W videos. I'm so naive. RIP your pc btw.
I like that one of the main features of the shuttle was reusability, and this completely throws that out the window
The shuttle and its engines are still recovered, all you need is one brand new giant monstrosity rocket!
@@TDChannelKSP based
The rocket is so Bigger@TDChannelKSP
I like.
Your builts 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 @TDChannelKSP
@@TDChannelKSPWhy did the Usa 🇺🇸 Glitch
Honestly i think the bolts holding the shuttle to the "pad" would snap
NASA punching the air rn, literally screaming and crying
I do really love the idea of launch vehicles launched from other worlds because of lower gravity and atmospheric drag. Like- Starship is planned to land on Mars and the Moon, but what if you built or landed a Super Heavy on one of those? Feels then you could get a much bigger payload or delta v. Or, like in this case, a Space Shuttle launching from Mars being enough to get back to Earth.
As shown in many of this channel’s videos, the issue isn’t getting back, it’s getting there in the first place
This whole thing was terrifying, and literally everythng about that re-entry and landing was luck.
I am *stunned*.
If its real Bros gonna burn the earth in real life💀💀☠️☠️☠️
You could save some mass by ditching the railing in the launch gantry. The empire learned this trick a long, long time ago.
Next video be like:
Bringing the whole of boca chica to alpha centauri only using areobee engines
The commitment that went into this crazy mission is insane breath taking!
How did you manage to make the crawler work? I downloaded it but for some reason the crawler didn't appeared maybe I did something wrong?
WOW!! Beautiful and amazing. The use of the Shuttle for return from Mars reminds me of the Churchill in LifeForce (1987). Great job!!
thing looks like Gru's rocket
We are clearly build different sir. 😅
There's something really unsettling about aerobraking with the orbiter pointing down...
It's the most cursed part of the video
only mars?puff
do alpha centauri
yay! on my birthday!
happy birthday
Its belated, but Happy Birthday!
Alright… send and SLS to alpha Centauri. I’m pretty sure that’s the only way you can out-do yourself at this point…
The density of the atmosphere on mars is 90 times lower than on the cape's runway, the landing speed on Mars would be about 6 times higher. How long would the runway have to be for a safe landing?
This speaks to me on another level. Also, at this point, you should have just stuffed a pile of boosters on the other side of the planet and just taken the whole planet! :P
Pov: Congress added few zeros to STS funds
And the funniest thing to me about this is that if those are hydrolox engines, this is technically eco-friendly! The only waste product of the burning fuel is water XD
8:08 deserts of kharak vibes
seriously this kind of vids looks so time consuming to do: and this is totally worth it continue like that!
Really cool vid. Thank for taking the time to put this together. Really gets the wheels turning.
NASA:(transport space shuttle into its launch site slowly, and gently as podsible)
TD Space: *LETS PUT THE F@CKING SPACE SHUTTLE ON MARS* For Recovering misson
Enterprise finally got a space flight!
This is a big rocket to launch to Mars and I like how it launches out of Mars back into Earth so it was really cool
And I like the rocket
I liked my own comment because nobody liked my comment
I love the way this launched 🚀🛰🛬
NASA with military budget.
Bro just caused a mass-extinction event
But I’m actually surprised that his pc can hold like 70 engines at once while mine can barely run with 1/4 graphics
One of these days I'd love to see a rocket using f1 engines as RCS
These are the type of videos that deserve to be on trending, not those cringy clickbait Fortnite RUclipsrs
Heh, thanks. Alas, this content just doesn't have the same broad appeal I suppose, but it's still doing reasonably well.
" Nasa Why Launch A Single 39 Launch pad The Launch Pad Will Make No Rockets Launch" nasa:"I dont care
Need more constant like this
isso foi uma das coisas mais bizarras que eu já vi alguém fazer no kerbal, parabéns XD
I think Mother nature is gonna take you to court for abuse cause your beating the air to submission with 57 sea dragon engines and no faring's lmao😂😂
It's when Space Shuttle Enterprise is on the pad that you realize that something is wrong...
All of Florida would cease to exist at launch 🤣
worth it
HMM what if I re-create it in SFS, this video is amazing...
This is indeed strange
I enjoyed that! And, y'know, anything is possible... 😊❤