Don't take this list as a "be-all-end-all" please, it is meant to entertain :) Also if you want to make your own tierlist, here is the template: tiermaker.com/create/wargame-red-dragon-coaltions-tierlist-1423341
Imo Czechoslovakia deserves a higher rating, such as mid B tier, their availability bonus is huge and they have less holes than China (infantry ATGMs, superheavy, FCS howitzer). Their infantry probably is somewhat worse than East Germany (although Lehka Pechota and Specialni are unique and very good and Motostrelci are strong line infantry), but they are better in almost every other category: better tanks, better helicopters with Vydskari in Mi-17s still being very potent, the air tab benefits massively from the availability buffs, better reconnaissance, etc.
They really shine in Tactical games. You can bring 3 OP Bomber migs, 3 Modernas, 3 Ondavas ( i think )... So its really cool when fighting in niche tactics... or overall too. I think they are a strong nation, they only seem to lack decent transports for fire support IMHO
i think you're underrating canada. they have decent infantry, decent aa and artillery, a good medium tank, a usable recon tab and a usable airforce. there are several nations in d-tier with far bigger capability gaps and fewer good cards. speaking of capability gaps, imho poland and japan should be ranked lower. japan lacks a decent 5pt transport, shock infantry, any medium tank, and their air tab has only 2 decent cards. poland has terrible infantry transports (except the promet, but you can't get it with combat infantry), no mortars and generally underwhelming indirect HE capabilities.
20:19 Say what you will about 10vs10 itself (I can see the appeal of playing it once awhile), but the fact that the 10vs10 playerbase absolutely refuses to play on servers with a normal amount of points really says a lot about those people.
All the Soviets need is just to have the BTR-80, BTR-80A, and BTR-90 available for the gornostrelki'90 as transports, also their mortars have a bug I believe, the NONA and NONA-SVK are based on the BTR-D and BTR-80, both these vehicles have 2 armour to the side and front, but the NONA has only 1 for side and front and NONA-SVK has 2 for only the front
I play the dutch a lot, and I find they're one of the better factions. Decent tanks, great recon (with that tank), you can spam out inf out the wazoo. My 2 gripes are expensive planes (but good) and really not a lot of great helicopter options
I would rank Canada much higher. Low C having a kindof superheavy replacement with the Chimera helps a lot. It's probably the worst superheavy but it can be used as one. Great inf/aa/mortar, competent air
So much triggered with Raz injustice Chinese motor, Korean general, Red Dragon mech - quite competitive 1v1 decks. Every single of them can take B-high C tier. Korean > Japan (1v1) in absolutely every aspect, except for the presence of SH (not so critical for 1v1).
Gave you a thumbs up and a sub. constructive criticsm: You talk a little fast at times, combined with the accent (no offense it, doesn't sound bad and your English is great!) it just makes some words hard to hear. If you talked just like a tiny bit slower, during those brief moments when you're fast talking I think it would be an improvement. Thanks for the list :)
With close to best infantry and a decent pallet of tanks I see it quite intresting to put Sweden at the bottom. Solo decks norway and denmark is not as frequent 😄 But intresting to see scandinavian decks as a strong coalition 😎
@@ProvidenceXIV Norrlandsjägare are quite good. Strf 90 is still a quite good transport as well. Only issue is with cheap spam. Still it's a manageable problem and far easier to play Sweden then Norway or Denmark that lacks tanks.
swedish infantry is among the worst. they don't have 10pt line infantry, they use only base mgs and they have only 2 decent transports, the very expensive 9040 and the 1-of tgb 13. their recon tab is also terrible.
@@FloppyHardrive1989 no super heavies, limited availability of the three good cards of tanks you do have. You have a single good fighter in the F-16, but it doubles as a tank killer. Nat China isn’t that good…. Having one thing that is Almost as good as Germany isn’t a good way to convince me the deck is good lol
@@df8340 What... just because ROK has flaws doesn't mean it doesn't deserve a higher rating, The Block 52D can perform double duty as a SEAD Plane but you got a decent back up ASF
Don't take this list as a "be-all-end-all" please, it is meant to entertain :)
Also if you want to make your own tierlist, here is the template: tiermaker.com/create/wargame-red-dragon-coaltions-tierlist-1423341
the best deck is the one the player enjoys the most :))))
Imo Czechoslovakia deserves a higher rating, such as mid B tier, their availability bonus is huge and they have less holes than China (infantry ATGMs, superheavy, FCS howitzer). Their infantry probably is somewhat worse than East Germany (although Lehka Pechota and Specialni are unique and very good and Motostrelci are strong line infantry), but they are better in almost every other category: better tanks, better helicopters with Vydskari in Mi-17s still being very potent, the air tab benefits massively from the availability buffs, better reconnaissance, etc.
They really shine in Tactical games.
You can bring 3 OP Bomber migs, 3 Modernas, 3 Ondavas ( i think )...
So its really cool when fighting in niche tactics... or overall too.
I think they are a strong nation, they only seem to lack decent transports for fire support IMHO
Now do all nations/coalitions + each individual specialization.
would realy love to see that at least with the viable specialations
@@fischyfischy7532 lmao
I cant wait for the map tierlist
I DID NOT EVEN THINK OF THAT
YOU'RE A GENIUS
@@RazzmannWG the madlad has done it
Razzmann: "Canada is probably the worst in the game."
Me, a former Canadian soldier: "And that makes me a saaaaaad panda."
Emotional damage!!
@@johndiebold4587 LOL, yup. Nice refrence.
Interesting to hear your thoughts on the various decks/coalitions like this. Thanks!
Instructions too complicated
Picked entente moto
Got rekt
HALP
Guess we need a video with all possible specialisations & faction combination
i think you're underrating canada. they have decent infantry, decent aa and artillery, a good medium tank, a usable recon tab and a usable airforce. there are several nations in d-tier with far bigger capability gaps and fewer good cards.
speaking of capability gaps, imho poland and japan should be ranked lower. japan lacks a decent 5pt transport, shock infantry, any medium tank, and their air tab has only 2 decent cards. poland has terrible infantry transports (except the promet, but you can't get it with combat infantry), no mortars and generally underwhelming indirect HE capabilities.
Now you need to organize a round robin tournament with Putin and Blitz using just Canadian and North Korean decks !
20:19 Say what you will about 10vs10 itself (I can see the appeal of playing it once awhile), but the fact that the 10vs10 playerbase absolutely refuses to play on servers with a normal amount of points really says a lot about those people.
Yeah its either a massive meatgrinder spamfest or a micromanage campfest. Both include artyspam of course.
All the Soviets need is just to have the BTR-80, BTR-80A, and BTR-90 available for the gornostrelki'90 as transports, also their mortars have a bug I believe, the NONA and NONA-SVK are based on the BTR-D and BTR-80, both these vehicles have 2 armour to the side and front, but the NONA has only 1 for side and front and NONA-SVK has 2 for only the front
I’ve been looking for a video exactly like this, ty for the info
I play the dutch a lot, and I find they're one of the better factions. Decent tanks, great recon (with that tank), you can spam out inf out the wazoo. My 2 gripes are expensive planes (but good) and really not a lot of great helicopter options
Anzec is unlucky South Africa
I would rank Canada much higher. Low C having a kindof superheavy replacement with the Chimera helps a lot. It's probably the worst superheavy but it can be used as one. Great inf/aa/mortar, competent air
Love a good tier list
So much triggered with Raz injustice
Chinese motor, Korean general, Red Dragon mech - quite competitive 1v1 decks. Every single of them can take B-high C tier.
Korean > Japan (1v1) in absolutely every aspect, except for the presence of SH (not so critical for 1v1).
Looking back I don't know why I put SK lower than Japan in 1vs1 specifically, I definitely agree there.
Gave you a thumbs up and a sub.
constructive criticsm: You talk a little fast at times, combined with the accent (no offense it, doesn't sound bad and your English is great!) it just makes some words hard to hear. If you talked just like a tiny bit slower, during those brief moments when you're fast talking I think it would be an improvement.
Thanks for the list :)
Philodo here; you know what's the best deck.
With close to best infantry and a decent pallet of tanks I see it quite intresting to put Sweden at the bottom. Solo decks norway and denmark is not as frequent 😄 But intresting to see scandinavian decks as a strong coalition 😎
Swedish infantry is not close to best. It's quite the opposite
aside from kustjagere and the atgm team what swedish infantry is good? Scandi coalition uses all norwegian/danish infantry
@@ProvidenceXIV Norrlandsjägare are quite good. Strf 90 is still a quite good transport as well. Only issue is with cheap spam. Still it's a manageable problem and far easier to play Sweden then Norway or Denmark that lacks tanks.
swedish infantry is among the worst. they don't have 10pt line infantry, they use only base mgs and they have only 2 decent transports, the very expensive 9040 and the 1-of tgb 13.
their recon tab is also terrible.
Alright! Now… all your matches tier list…
Damn dude, poor Canada. Theyve got the lumberjacks tho!
I really feel Finland must somehow be better than East Germany in 1vs1, but I can't find a way to prove it.
Well if you are very practiced with a "bad" deck, you are more dangerous with that deck than a "good" deck you do not know very well wouldn't you say?
Why is ROK in D tier, you get so many nice units and they mesh well together imo
Agree, RoK have good infantry in good transports, good ss and arty, the K1 and K1a1, some decent recon options, decent helo options, and good planes.
Because you so many better options as Blu4?
@@FloppyHardrive1989 why would you take RoC over any of the much better decks though. It’s just not better and c/d seems pretty appropriate
@@FloppyHardrive1989 no super heavies, limited availability of the three good cards of tanks you do have. You have a single good fighter in the F-16, but it doubles as a tank killer.
Nat China isn’t that good…. Having one thing that is Almost as good as Germany isn’t a good way to convince me the deck is good lol
@@df8340 What... just because ROK has flaws doesn't mean it doesn't deserve a higher rating, The Block 52D can perform double duty as a SEAD Plane but you got a decent back up ASF
Poland in C with no mortar is a very interesting one. Also I think you are really sleeping on ROK even without infantry ATGMs
i can't find yugoslavia deck on your spreadsheet
Since Warno isn't that good - would you go over it again in detail, as said? Would be great ^^
Eventually :)
canada is holding is back gentlemen! I knew their maple syrup did nothing for our gunships and planes.
Hmm is that US unspec that is S tier?
I’m pretty sure norad is S
Game prob would be fun if you could actually see the figures without losing overall perspective by zooming in.
19:35 le dot
y u foken touch polen bruh?? triggered
WOW! USSR S tier???
How is it not the only thing it lacks is a good recon tank that’s about it
@@skyninjaslayer337 yep ussr is great they can do everything well
@@crumpetcommandos779 well not recon tanks but that’s littearly it
@@skyninjaslayer337 well yeah that haha dont they only get a recon t55 lol
@@crumpetcommandos779 stupid but I understand why and I never got why each nation does not get motors